The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3. PLN-19-00173 9002 FirestonePC AGENDA PAGE 1 PC AGENDA PAGE 2 PC AGENDA PAGE 3 PC AGENDA PAGE 4 PC AGENDA PAGE 5 PC AGENDA PAGE 6 PC AGENDA PAGE 7 PC AGENDA PAGE 8 PC AGENDA PAGE 9 PC AGENDA PAGE 10 PC AGENDA PAGE 11 PC AGENDA PAGE 12 PC AGENDA PAGE 13 PC AGENDA PAGE 14 PC AGENDA PAGE 15 PC AGENDA PAGE 16 PC AGENDA PAGE 17 PC AGENDA PAGE 18 PC AGENDA PAGE 19 PC AGENDA PAGE 20 PC AGENDA PAGE 21 PC AGENDA PAGE 22 PC AGENDA PAGE 23 PC AGENDA PAGE 24 PC AGENDA PAGE 25 PC AGENDA PAGE 26 PC AGENDA PAGE 27 PC AGENDA PAGE 28 PC AGENDA PAGE 29 PC AGENDA PAGE 30 RESOLUTION NO. 21- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY APPROVING A SITE PLAN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND VARIANCE, THEREBY ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 1,698 SQUARE FOOT COFFEE SHOP WITH OUTDOOR SEATING AND DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES, AND A PARKING REDUCTION ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9002 FIRESTONE BOULEVARD IN THE LAKEWOOD/FIRESTONE SPECIFIC PLAN 91-2. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Downey does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 11, 2019, Chris Huddleston (hereinafter “applicant”), submitted a request for a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance, to renovate to demolish the existing restaurant and construct a new 1,698 square foot coffee shop, with outdoor seating and drive-through facilities, and a request for a parking reduction; and, B. On November 26, 2019, the applicants were issued a letter deeming the application incomplete. C. On January 15, 2021, the application was deemed complete after all required documents were submitted and reviewed. D. On May 4, 2021, a notice of the public hearing was sent to all property owners within 500’ of the subject site and the notice was published in Downey Patriot; and, G. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on February 17, 2021, and after fully considering all oral and written testimony, facts, and opinions offered at the aforesaid public hearing adopted this resolution. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission further finds, determines and declares that the proposed project was reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and is categorially exempt from CEQA, pursuant to Guideline Section 15332 (Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects). Class 32 consists of projects that are consistent with the General Plan and zoning, on a site that is less than five acres and does not have any protected habitat, and can be adequately served by utilities. The proposed project meets all of these requirements, thus qualifies for a Class 32 exemption. SECTION 3. Having considered all of the oral and written evidence presented to it at said public hearings regarding the Site Plan Review, the Planning Commission further finds, determines and declares that: A. The site plan is consistent with all applicable goals and policies specified in the City’s General Plan and policies adopted by the City Council. In addition, the project’s objective to revitalize the site helps achieve various long-term goals. Specifically, the following policies are promoted by the proposed project: Policy 8.1.1 – Promote architectural design of the highest quality. PC AGENDA PAGE 31 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 2 Policy 8.2.2 – Promote the upgrading of properties. The proposed architecture is a significant upgrade to the existing facility on site, and is compatible with surrounding properties. The redevelopment of this site can serve as an example of higher quality architecture for future developments throughout the city. Program 1.1.4 – Provide an appropriate amount of land use for people to acquire goods and services. The proposed development promotes the above policy by facilitating access to the site and the goods offered. This will expand the type of goods and services available to the nearby community and general public. B. The proposed development is in accordance with the purposes and objectives of this article and the zone in which the site is located. The proposed project is located within the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan 91-2, which is the underlying zoning for the area. The project complies with the Development Standards for a project in Site 14, Sub-Area 5, Sector A. An objective of the Specific Plan is to permit and encourage land uses that would benefit from the study area’s location near a regional shopping center. The replacement of the existing restaurant with a new 1,698 square foot coffee shop with outdoor seating and drive-through will update the subject site with a modern contemporary design and upgraded landscaping. Additionally, the requested parking reduction would comply with the minimum required parking in other areas of the City. C. The proposed development’s site plan and its design features, including architecture and landscaping, will integrate harmoniously and enhance the character and design of the site, the immediate neighborhood, and the surrounding areas of the City. The proposed design of the project will integrate harmoniously with this area by providing aesthetically pleasing architecture and landscaping. The new 1,698 square coffee shop with outdoor seating and drive- through will include a contemporary architectural design, which places an emphasis on the use of rectangular forms and utilizes horizontal and vertical lines, and adds outdoor seating, which the current restaurant lacks. The Lakewood/Firestone intersection does not have a clear established design aesthetic, but the quality architecture proposed on the subject site is expected to create an enhancement to the streetscape. In addition, the streetscape will be further enhanced by upgrading the site with decorative, drought tolerant landscaping. D. The site plan and location of the buildings, parking areas, signs, landscaping, luminaries, and other site features indicate that proper consideration has been given to both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile and pedestrian circulation, and the visual effects of the development from the view of the public streets. The subject site is located on a prominent and active intersection and therefore required significant analysis of potential traffic impacts, on-site circulation, potential impacts to the surrounding area, and architectural design. The Ganddini Group, Inc. conducted comparison site assessments and prepared a Traffic Impact Analysis that determined the specific need and PC AGENDA PAGE 32 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 3 potential impacts of the proposed development. The results of the study determined that the average operations on the site would be accommodated by the proposed development. The study noted that occasional peaks may occur but, the proposed configuration of the development would be able to accommodate these peaks onsite. The study determined that activity associated with the proposed development is not expected to negatively impact the surrounding areas. The proposed architecture of the building and the proposed landscaping along the Firestone and Lakewood Boulevard frontages are expected to improve the streetscape at this intersection. The variety of the landscaping will complement the aesthetics of the site by providing a balanced mixture of trees, plants and shrubs, and groundcover. E. The proposed development will improve the community appearance by preventing extremes of dissimilarity or monotony in new construction or in alterations of facilities. The proposed project reflects a contemporary architecture style. The proposed architectural style is neither dissimilar nor monotonous from other buildings in the area and this project will upgrade the overall appearance of the site, which in turn, improves the community appearance. The Aldi grocery store located across Lakewood Boulevard is a recent development and also incorporates a contemporary design. The proposed development will be in keeping with the quality of design, of more recent commercial developments in the area. F. The site plan and design considerations shall tend to upgrade property in the immediate neighborhood and surrounding areas with an accompanying betterment of conditions affecting the public health, safety, comfort, and welfare. The proposed architecture is a significant upgrade to the existing facilities on site, and is compatible with surrounding properties although it will be newer than most developments within its proximity. In addition, the redevelopment of this site can serve as an example for higher quality architecture for future developments within the City of Downey. Lastly, the operational procedures of the proposed development are also conditioned in an effort to ensure that any potential effects in public health, safety, comfort and general welfare are mitigated to the greatest extent possible. The project will also include a two-foot dedication along Lakewood Boulevard, which will allow for future street alignment purposes. G. The proposed development’s site plan and its design features will include graffiti- resistant features and materials in accordance with the requirements of Section 4960 of Chapter 10 of Article IV of this Code. The project has been conditioned to meet the requirements specified in Section 4960 of the Downey Municipal Code. Section 4960 discusses the installation of anti-graffiti materials and the appropriate allotted time limit for the removal of graffiti. SECTION 4. Having considered all of the oral and written evidence presented to it at said public hearings regarding the Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission further finds, determines and declares that: A. The requested Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the intent and purpose of this article or the City’s General Plan or the public convenience or PC AGENDA PAGE 33 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 4 general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood thereof. The project is consistent with all applicable goals and policies; additionally the project’s revitalization of the site helps achieve various long-term goals. Specifically, the following policies are promoted by the proposed project: Policy 8.1.1 – Promote architectural design of the highest quality. Policy 8.2.2 – Promote the upgrading of properties. Program 1.1.4 – Provide an appropriate amount of land use for people to acquire goods and services. The proposed architecture is a significant upgrade to the existing facility on site, and is compatible with surrounding properties although it will be newer than most developments within its proximity. The project is not expected to introduce a nuisance related to public convenience or general welfare to any nearby persons residing or working in the area. The redevelopment of this can serve as an example of higher quality architecture for future developments within the city. The CUP promotes the above policy by introducing a new component (drive-through) that aims to complement the coffee shop that it will serve. This will not only continue to provide, but will also expand, the type and amount of goods and services available to the nearby community and general public. B. The requested use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located. The proposed use (drive-through) is intended to complement the proposed coffee shop. The use is a common amenity typically found within major commercial corridors. The project is anticipated to provide adequate parking supply to accommodate the typical average parking demand, though there may be short periods of time during the AM and PM peak hours where parking capacity is reached. It is anticipated that this parking demand will only occur occasionally for a short period of time during the AM and PM peak hours, however the project is anticipated to provide adequate parking supply to accommodate the average parking demand. C. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area. The site is approximately 17,719 square feet, and the proposed buildings will occupy a total of 1,698 square feet, resulting in a lot coverage of 9.65%, far less than the maximum of 25%. The drive-through exceeds the required development standards for drive-through businesses (per D.M.C. Section 9406) and is found to be satisfactory per the analysis contained in the November 18, 2021 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis for this application. The study reasoned that after the State’s Stay-at-Home orders have been lifted, the proposed stacking of nine vehicles will be able to accommodate the 85th percentile queue length of nine vehicles. The 85th percentile queue length is the value that is higher than 85% of all of the observed queue lengths (those within the top 15% of the observed queue lengths). The project is anticipated to provide adequate parking supply to accommodate the typical average parking demand, though there may be short periods of time during the AM and PM peak hours where parking capacity is reached. PC AGENDA PAGE 34 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 5 In addition, the proposed improvement does not create alterations that would restrict future permitted uses from occupying the site or an existing use located within the nearby area from altering their operations. Therefore, the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area. D. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways in the area. Firestone Boulevard and Lakewood Boulevard are major arterials which are designed to accommodate the type of traffic that will be generated by this application request. The two separate driveways allow different opportunities for ingress and egress from the site. Therefore, traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways in the area. Overall, the proposed coffee shop is anticipated to generate a total of 1,393 gross daily trips, which will result in approximately 81 fewer daily trips than the current restaurant. While the operation of the site will create nine additional trips during the am peak hour, and 18 fewer trips during the PM peak hour, the project is not anticipated to negatively impact the level of service along Lakewood Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard. SECTION 5. Having considered all of the oral and written evidence presented to it at said public hearings regarding the Variance, the Planning Commission further finds, determines and declares that: A. Exceptional or extraordinary conditions or circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not generally applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same vicinity and zone. This variance only applies to the required on-site parking and all other development standards comply with the Downey Municipal Code. The 17,719 square foot lot is smaller than most of the lots located in the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan. The average lot size for properties in Subarea 5 is 79,047 square feet, which is significantly larger than the subject site. The existing site is not typical of most lots in the surrounding area and creates major impediments to complying with the required parking; a ratio that is double the requirement of the rest of the City due to its location within an older Specific Plan area. These circumstances create an undue burden upon the property owner and overly restrict the property owner from improving the property as other properties are able to do in the same zone. B. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this article would deprive the applicant of rights under the terms of this article commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Relative to surrounding properties, at 17,719 square feet, the subject site is considered small and does not provide sufficient space for the required 36 parking spaces associated with a 1,698 square foot coffee shop with an outdoor seating area, and a drive-through, as required by the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan. The applicant is providing 18 spaces, which would normally comply with the Downey Municipal Code requirement in other areas of the City. Multiple development standards must be incorporated as part of the development and conflict with the placement of additional parking include appropriate parking stall dimensions, site and parking lot landscaping, and required setbacks. Furthermore, there is a two- PC AGENDA PAGE 35 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 6 foot wide dedication required along Lakewood Boulevard, which further reduced the size of the site for available improvements. Therefore, given that the unique conditions are specific to this lot, it can be determined that the provisions of this article would deprive the property owner from enjoying their property as others in the same zone or vicinity. C. The exceptional or extraordinary conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. The lot measures 17,719 square feet in area, and is the smallest lot in the general area. This is an existing lot, and not a subdivision completed by the applicant to create a unique condition. The nonconforming lot size existing at the time the property was acquired did not result from actions by the applicant. D. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to other lands, structures, or building in the same vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The granting of this Variance does not allow the applicant any special privilege that is denied by the Downey Municipal Code. The variance for a deviation from the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan 91-2 would not create a privilege for the property, but rather enables the property owner’s ability to operate a use (coffee shop) with a parking ratio that is applied to other commercially zoned properties throughout the City. The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for this project indicates that the actual parking need for this use can be accommodated by the 18 parking spaces typically associated with this type of use in other commercially zoned areas of the City. E. The granting of such variance will be in harmony and not adversely affect the General Plan of the City. The project is consistent with all applicable goals and policies specified in the City’s General Plan. In addition, the project’s main objective to revitalize the site helps achieve various long-term goals. Specifically, the following policies are promoted by proposed project: Policy 8.1.1 – Promote architectural design of the highest quality. Policy 8.2.2 – Promote the upgrading of properties. Program 1.1.4 – Provide an appropriate amount of land use for people to acquire goods and services. The proposed architecture is a significant upgrade to the existing facility on site, and is compatible with surrounding properties although it will be newer than most developments within its proximity. The project is not expected to introduce a nuisance related to public convenience or general welfare to any nearby persons residing or working in the area. The redevelopment of this can serve as an example of higher quality architecture for future developments within the city. The CUP promotes the above policy by introducing a new component (drive-through) that aims to complement the coffee shop that it will serve. This will not only continue to provide, but will also expand, the type and amount of goods and services available to the nearby community and general public. The Variance promotes the above policy by introducing a new component that aims to complement the restaurant that it will serve. This will not only continue to PC AGENDA PAGE 36 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 7 provide, but will also expand, the type and amount of goods and services available to the nearby community and general public. F. The reasons set forth in the application justify the granting of the variance and the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure. The subject site is smaller than properties located in the immediate area. The parking requirement for a coffee shop with a drive-through in the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan 91-2 is twice that found in other commercial areas of the City. A reduction in the number of parking spaces from 36 to 18 is in keeping with number of parking spaces typically required of other restaurants with drive-through facilities. Additionally, the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for this project indicates that the proposed parking needed for this use is more in line with the 18 parking spaces typically associated with this type of use in other commercially zoned areas in the City. SECTION 6. Based upon the findings set forth in Sections 1 through 6 of this Resolution, the Planning Commission of the City of Downey hereby approves the Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance (PLN-19-00173), subject to conditions of approval attached hereto as Exhibit ‘A’, which are necessary to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the community and enable the Planning Commission to make the findings set forth in the previous sections. The conditions are fair and reasonable for the accomplishment of these purposes. SECTION 7. The Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of February 2021. Miguel Duarte, Chairman, City Planning Commission I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of a Resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Downey at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 17th day of February 2021, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Mary Cavanagh, Secretary City Planning Commission PC AGENDA PAGE 37 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 8 PLN-19-00173 (SITE PLAN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, & VARIANCE) EXHIBIT A – CONDITIONS PLANNING 1) The approval of this Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance (PLN-19- 00173) allows for the construction of a one-story 1,698 square-foot coffee shop with outdoor seating, drive-through, and a parking reduction, for property located at 9002 Firestone Boulevard, Downey, CA 90242. 2) The Variance is approved to allow the site to operate with 18 parking spaces, rather than the 36 parking spaces required by the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan 91-2. 3) This approval shall not be construed to mean any waiver of applicable and appropriate zoning regulations, or any Federal, State, County, and City laws and regulations. Unless otherwise expressly specified, all other requirements of the City of Downey Municipal Code shall apply. 4) The site shall remain in substantial conformance with this request and the approved set of plans date stamped January 15, 2021. 5) The Owner/Applicant agrees, as a condition of approval of this resolution, to indemnify, defend and hold harmless, at Applicant's expense, City and City's agents, officers and employees from and against any claim, action or proceeding commenced within the time period provided in Government Code Section 66499.37 to attack, review, set aside, void or annul the approval of this resolution, to challenge the determination made by City under the California Environmental Quality Act or to challenge the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached hereto. City shall promptly notify Applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding to which City receives notice, and City will cooperate fully with Applicant in the defense thereof. Applicant shall reimburse the City for any court costs and attorney's fees that the City may be required to pay as a result of any such claim, action or proceeding. City may, in its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding, but such participation shall not relieve Applicant of the obligations of this condition. 6) The City Planner is authorized to make minor modifications to the approved preliminary plans or any of the conditions if such modifications shall achieve substantially the same results as would strict compliance with said plans and conditions. 7) Prior to the submittal of plans into Building and Safety Plan Check or commencement of business, whichever occurs first, the applicant and the property owner shall sign an affidavit of Acceptance of Conditions, as provided by the City of Downey. 8) The applicant must comply with the art in public places requirements set forth in Downey Municipal Code 8950 et seq. This shall include payment of all required fees prior to the issuance of building permits. Should the applicant exercise their right to install public art on site, the public art application (including payment of all deposits) shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. 9) The use approved herein must be executed within one year of approval or shall be PC AGENDA PAGE 38 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 9 subject to revocation where this approval will be deemed null and void. 10) The business owner shall consent to and provide access to all areas of the subject premises without charge during normal business hours to any City Official for purposes of verifying compliance with any of the Conditions of Approval of this application. 11) The approved architectural style shall be Contemporary, as noted in the approved plans. Changes to the facades and/or colors shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. 12) All finished materials must be to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Final approval of all building materials (including but not limited to glass type, wall texture, metal canopies, wood panels) must be granted by the City Planner prior to the issuance of Building Permits. This application does not grant final approval of the selected materials; f inal materials will be evaluated and reviewed through the Building Permit process. 13) All landscaping must comply with the Downey Municipal Code, be composed of drought tolerant plants, and requires final approval from the City Planner prior to the issuance of Building Permits. This application does not grant final approval of the landscape design. Final approvals will be granted through the Building Permit process. 14) The permitted hours of operation of the coffee shop and drive-through are Monday – Sunday 4:30 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. 15) All exterior lights on the property must be LED and must be directed, positioned, and/or shielded such that they do not illuminate surrounding properties and the public right-of- way. 16) For security purposes, lighting must be placed in such a way as to illuminate the area surrounding the trash enclosure. This lighting shall be un-switched and photo-sensor controlled. 17) All interior and exterior mechanical, plumbing, and unfinished electrical equipment and materials (including but not limited to wiring and pipes) must be screened from the public’s view. All screening materials must be approved by the City Planner. 18) Any bollards on the site must be decorative in nature and shall be approved by the City Planner. 19) Queueing associated with the drive-through facilities shall be contained on-site and also allow for appropriate ingress/egress onto the site. 20) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a retaining wall design consistent with materials shown on the application renderings to the City Planner for review and approval. 21) All buildings and walls must be finished with graffiti resistant materials. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Planner, that the finished materials will comply with this requirement. 22) Any graffiti applied to the site shall be removed within 48 hours. PC AGENDA PAGE 39 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 10 23) The applicant must provide decorative pavers across the driveways. The decorative pavers shall be as approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 24) Roof-mounted equipment shall be screened at all times by a material to be approved by the City Planner. 25) A stop sign must be installed at the end of the drive-through lane. 26) All above grade back-flow preventers, and check valves shall be and screened from view from the public right-of -way with decorative metal cut-out panels, as approved by the City Planner. 27) The proposed transformer shall be concealed through the use of landscaping and/or decorative screen panels. 28) Noise generated from the site, including the drive-through speaker shall comply with Municipal Code Section 4600 et. seq. In any case, noise shall not exceed 65 dBA, as measured at the property line. Volume on speaker to be lowered between the hours of 4:30 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. to 12:00 p.m. 29) Prior to the installation of any signs, the property owner must obtain approval of a Sign permit. 30) The applicant must place delineating marks throughout the site and at both driveways to distinguish ingress and egress onto the site. 31) The applicant must incorporate a copy of this Exhibit A, Conditions of Approval, into the approved set of building plans. 32) All rules and regulations set forth by the California Department of Public Health and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health shall be enforced and complied with. The applicant shall be subject to any and all applicable orders issued by these agencies to protect the public health such as the most recent orders for social distancing and operational restrictions related to the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. BUILDING 33) All construction shall comply with the most recent adopted City and State building codes: • 2019 California Building Code • 2019 California Electrical Code • 2019 California Mechanical Code • 2019 California Plumbing Code • 2019 California Fire Code • 2019 California Green Code 34) Special Inspections – As indicated by California Building Code Section 1704, the owner shall employ one or more special inspectors who shall provide special inspections when required by CBC section 1704. Please contact the Building Division at time of plan submittal to obtain application for special inspections. PC AGENDA PAGE 40 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 11 35) The Title Sheet of the plans shall include: • Occupancy Group • Occupant Load • Description of use • Type of Construction • Height of Building • Floor area of building(s) and/or occupancy group(s) 36) School impact fees shall be paid prior to permit issuance. 37) Dimensioned building setbacks and property lines, street centerlines and between buildings or other structures shall be designed on plot plan. 38) All property lines and easements must be shown on plot plan. A statement that such lines and easements are shown is required. 39) The project design will conform with energy conservation measures articulated in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations and address measures to reduce energy consumption such as flow restrictors for toilets, low consumptions light fixtures, and insulation and shall use to the extent feasible draught landscaping. 40) A design professional will be required at time of construction drawings, to prepare plans for proposed improvements per the Business and Professions’ Code. 41) Public and private site improvements shall be designed in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Chapter 11 of the California Building Code. Site plan shall include a site accessibility plan identifying exterior routes of travel and detailing running slope, cross slope, width, pedestrian ramp, curb ramps, handrails, signage and truncated domes. Path of travel shall be provided from the public right of way and accessible parking to building. The design professional shall ensure that the site accessibility plan is compliance with the latest Federal and State regulations. 42) All projects including food service or Public pools and/or spas shall be checked and approved by the County Health Department as part of the building department plan review process. 43) Construction hours shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Saturdays. There shall be no construction on the site outside of these hours. FIRE 44) Provide detail on occupancy type, use, and occupant load as to ascertain if deferred submittal of fire sprinkler and alarm plans shall be necessary. Automatic fire sprinkler system design, installation, and testing shall be per NFPA 13 [CFC § 903.2.1.2 #3; DMC 3318]; and automatic fire alarm and detection system design, installation, and testing shall be per NFPA 72 [CFC § 907; DMC 3318]. 45) Construction to meet the minimum current CA Fire and Building Code requirements for planned occupancy use and type PC AGENDA PAGE 41 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 12 46) Premises shall be appropriately addressed. An approved address identification shall be provided that is legible and placed in a position that is visible from the street/road. Sizing shall be meet the requirements of CA Fire Code [CA Fire Code §505.1] 47) Provide key boxes (i.e. Knox Boxes) to occupancy [CA Fire Code §506.1] 48) Approved fire lanes shall be provided [CA Fire Code §503.1.1] 49) Fire lane designation and stripping shall adhere to sign requirements set forth in Fire Code and Downey Municipal Code [CA Fire Code D103.6; DMC 3327] PUBLIC WORKS 50) All public utilities shall be installed underground. 51) The owner/applicant shall dedicate two feet (2‘) for right-of-way purposes along Lakewood Boulevard to the standards of the City Engineering Division 52) Proposed public improvements shall comply with the latest edition of Standard Plans and Specifications for Public Works Construction, City of Downey standards and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 53) Obtain permits from the Public Works Department for all improvements within the public right of way at least two weeks prior to commencing work. Contact Brian Aleman, Assistant Civil Engineer, at (562) 904-7110 for information. 54) Remove and replace damaged, uneven or sub-standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, and pavement to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. Contact the Public Works Inspector at (562) 904-7110 to identify the limits of the areas to be removed and replaced at least 48 hours prior to commencing work. 55) Owner/Applicant shall reconstruct the existing driveway approach per Standard Plans of Public Works Construction (SPPWC) No. 110-2 Type C. Driveway width bottom of X to bottom of X shall be a minimum of 26 feet in order accommodate for large vehicles. The new widen driveways shall be at least five (5) feet away from any above-ground obstructions (including storm drains) in the public right-of-way to the top of the driveway “X.” Otherwise, the obstruction shall be relocated at the applicant’s expense. Ensure that each driveway provides proper pedestrian access across, in compliance with ADA standards. The final layout and site driveway approach design shall be subject to the review and approval by the Public Works Department. 56) All unused driveway approaches shall be removed and constructed with full-height curb gutter, and sidewalk to match existing improvements. 57) Submit public improvement plan for review and approval by Public Works Department prior to the start of construction and the issuance of any encroachment permit for improvements within the public right of way. 58) Remove all Underground Service Alert (USA) temporary pavement markings immediately following the completion of the work / Final permit inspection. PC AGENDA PAGE 42 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 13 59) Paint property address numbers (4” height) on the curb face in front of the proposed development to the City’s satisfaction. 60) Any utilities that are in conflict with the development shall be relocated at the owner/applicant's expense. 61) Complete a construction & demolition (C&D) waste management plan per Article V, Chapter 8 of the Downey Municipal Code. 62) Construct onsite pavement, consisting of a minimum section of 4” thick aggregate base, and a minimum 2-1/2” thick asphalt concrete pavement. Construct Pavement on-site parking and circulation areas as required by a pavement engineering or geotechnical report prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, subject to the review and approval of the Public Works and Community Development Departments. 63) The owner/applicant must comply with all applicable Federal, State and local rules and regulations, American Disabilities Act (ADA), including compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regulations. Traffic 64) The owner / applicant shall prepare and submit a traffic impact analysis study to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer, who shall define the specific requirements of the Study. The owner / applicant shall be responsible for any improvements required to mitigate traffic impacts created by the project as identified by the study and / or financially contribute a fair share toward the cost of constructing capital improvement(s), not considered part of the frontage of the project site, necessary to offset all or a portion of the project traffic impacts. 65) Submit a traffic impact study for the city engineer’s review and approval. Said study shall include the following unless otherwise specified: • Trip generation, distribution and assignment. • Level of service analysis. • Queuing analysis for driveways and turn pockets. • Sight Distance for intersections and driveways. • All Public and Private signing and markings for vehicular traffic. • Street/ driveway and internal private development circulation shall be certified to accommodate truck turning movements. • Signal/stop signs warrants. Water & Sewer 66) The owner/applicant shall retrofit any existing fire hydrant(s) within the property frontage in accordance to latest Fire Department and Department of Public Works standards including but not limited to furnishing and installation of a new riser, fire hydrant head, and associated fittings. 67) The owner/applicant shall provide a fire sprinkler system(s) in accordance with Fire Department and Building and Safety standards. Should such fire sprinkler system(s) PC AGENDA PAGE 43 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 14 require the installation of dedicated fire service lateral(s), such lateral(s) shall be constructed in accordance with the latest Department of Public Works and Fire Department standards including backflow devices, fire department connections and other appurtenances as required. New fire service lateral(s) shall be connected to existing 8-inch main located on Firestone Boulevard and shall be dedicated for fire service only. 68) The owner/applicant shall furnish and install irrigation, domestic, and fire water backflow devices in accordance with City of Downey standards and as required by State and LA County Department of Public Health. Backflow devices shall be located on private property, readily accessible for emergency and inspection purposes, and screened from view by providing sufficient landscaping. 69) Backflow devices shall be certified in the field by a licensed LA County Department of Public Health certified tester prior to placing into service and such certification provided to City. 70) Existing potable, irrigation and fire water service lines and associated appurtenances must be removed and abandoned from existing water main. 71) Owner or tenant must establish accounts with the City Cashier prior to the City activating and the tenant using any fire, potable, or recycled water service and meter. 72) The owner/applicant shall consult the Department of Public Works to determine the sewer location and design requirements. 73) Site shall be served by adequately sized water supply facilities, which shall include fire hydrants of the size, type and location approved by the Fire Chief. 74) The water mains shall be of sufficient size to accommodate the total domestic and fire flow required for the subdivision. The domestic/fire water flows required are to be checked and approved by the Dept. of Public Works or the water provider for size and velocity. Fire flows required are to be determined by the Fire Chief. 75) Any deviation from the city standards in constructing the water and sewer lines shall be approved by the Los Angeles County Health Department. Grading 76) Submit an engineered grading plan and/or hydraulic calculations and site drainage plan for the site (prepared and sealed by a registered civil engineer in the State of California) accompanied by a soil and geology report for approval by the Engineering Division and Building and Safety Division. Lot(s) shall not have less than one (1%) percent gradient on any asphalt or non-paved surface, or less than one quarter (1/4%) percent gradient on any concrete surface. Provide the following information on plans: topographic site information, including all building pad and other elevations, dimensions/location of existing/proposed public improvements adjacent to project (i.e. street, sidewalk, parkway and driveway widths, catch basins, pedestrian ramps); the width and location of all existing and proposed easements, the dimensions and location of proposed dedications; (for alley dedications, show elevations of the four corners of the dedication and centerline of alley, existing and proposed underground utility connections); the location, PC AGENDA PAGE 44 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 15 depth and dimensions of potable water, reclaimed water and sanitary sewer lines; chemical and hazardous material storage, if any, including containment provisions; and the type of existing use, including the gross square footage of the building and its disposition; construction details of drainage devices and details of Low Impact Development (LID) plan. 77) Include any other applicable site-specific conditions. 78) The drainage plan must provide for the site having an independent drainage system to the public street, to a public drainage facility, or by means of an approved drainage easement. 79) Surface water generated from the site shall not drain over the sidewalk or driveway into the gutter on Firestone Boulevard or Lakewood Boulevard. A parkway drain(s) is required for sites. NPDES 80) The owner/applicant shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES); Ordinance 1142 of the Downey Municipal Code (DMC); and the Low Impact Development (LID) Plan. Furthermore, the applicant shall be required to Certify and append Public Works standard “Attachment A” to all construction and grading plans as required by the LACoDPW Stormwater Quality Management Plan (SQMP). 81) If any hazardous material is encountered on the site that has the potential to reach the ground water supply, the owner/applicant shall secure a permit for the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. 82) If any hazardous material is encountered on the site, the owner/applicant shall secure an ID number from the EPA. 83) The owner/applicant shall deploy Best Management Practices during and after construction. Assessment District 84) The owner/applicant hereby consents to the annexation of the property into the Downey City Lighting Maintenance District in accordance with Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, and to incorporation or annexation into a new or existing Benefit Assessment or Municipal Improvement District in accordance with Division 10 and Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code and/or Division 2 of the Government Code of the State of California. [End of Conditions] PC AGENDA PAGE 45 Resolution No. 21- Downey Planning Commission PLN-19-00173 – 9002 Firestone Blvd. February 17, 2020 - Page 16 Attachment A Storm Water Pollution Control Requirements for Construction Activities Minimum Water Quality Protection Requirements for All Development Construction Projects/Certification Statement The following is intended as an attachment for construction and grading plans and represent the minimum standards of good housekeeping which must be implemented on all construction sites regardless of size. ☐ Eroded sediments and other pollutants must be retained on site and may not be transported from the site via sheetflow, swales, area drains, natural drainage courses or wind. ☐ Stockpiles of earth and other construction related materials must be protected from being transported from the site by the forces of wind or water. ☐ Fuels, oils, solvents and other toxic materials must be stored in accordance with their listing and are not to contaminate the soil and surface waters. All approved storage containers are to be protected from the weather. Spills must be cleaned up immediately and disposed of in a proper manner. Spills may not be washed into the drainage system. ☐ Non-storm water runoff from equipment and vehicle washing and any other activity shall be contained at the project site. ☐ Excess or waste concrete may not be washed into the public way or any other drainage system. Provisions shall be made to retain concrete wastes on site until they can be disposed of as solid waste. ☐ Trash and construction related solid wastes must be deposited into a covered receptacle to prevent contamination of rainwater and dispersal by wind. ☐ Sediments and other materials may not be tracked from the site by vehicle traffic. The construction entrance roadways must be stabilized so as to inhibit sediments from being deposited into the public way. Accidental depositions must be swept up immediately and may not be washed down by rain or other means. ☐ Any slopes with disturbed soils or denuded of vegetation must be stabilized so as to inhibit erosion by wind and water. ☐ Other _________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ As the project owner or authorized agent of the owner, I have read and understand the requirements listed above, necessary to control storm water pollution from sediments, erosion, and construction materials, and I certify that I will comply with these requirements. Project Name: ________________________________________________________________ Project Address: ______________________________________________________________ Print Name ______________________________________ (Owner or authorized agent of the owner) Signature ________________________________________ Date ____________________ (Owner or authorized agent of the owner) PC AGENDA PAGE 46 Tra c Engineering Transporta on Planning Parking Noise & Vibra on Air Quality Global Climate Change Health Risk Assessment STARBUCKS 9002 FIRESTONE BOULEVARD PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS City of Downey November 18,2020 PC AGENDA PAGE 47 <UNHIDDEN> prepared by Tom Huang, TE Giancarlo Ganddini, TE, PTP GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Santa Ana, California 92705 714.795.3100 | www.ganddini.com 19274 STARBUCKS 9002 FIRES TONE BOULEVARD PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS City of Downey November 18, 2020 PC AGENDA PAGE 48 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis i 19274 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Objectives ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Project Description .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Analysis Scenarios ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Intersection Capacity Utilization Methodology ....................................................................................................... 4 Intersection Delay Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 4 Performance Standards .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Requirements for Improvements ................................................................................................................................. 5 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Existing Roadway System .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Pedestrian Facilities ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Bicycle Routes .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Transit Facilities ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Truck Routes ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 General Plan Context ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Existing (2020) Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................................................... 7 Existing Level of Service ................................................................................................................................................ 8 4. PROJECT TRIP FORECASTS ............................................................................................................................. 19 Project Trip Generation .............................................................................................................................................. 19 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment .............................................................................................................. 19 Project Design Features .............................................................................................................................................. 19 5. FUTURE VOLUME FORECASTS ...................................................................................................................... 26 Cumulative Trips ........................................................................................................................................................... 26 Ambient Growth Rate ...................................................................................................................................... 26 Other Development ......................................................................................................................................... 26 Analysis Scenario Volume Forecasts ....................................................................................................................... 26 Existing 2020 Plus Project .............................................................................................................................. 26 Opening Year (2022) Without Project ........................................................................................................ 26 Opening Year (2022) With Project............................................................................................................... 27 6. FUTURE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................... 41 Existing 2020 Plus Project ......................................................................................................................................... 41 Opening Year (2022) Without Project .................................................................................................................... 41 Opening Year (2022) With Project .......................................................................................................................... 41 7. PARKING ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................... 45 Parking Required by City Municipal Code ............................................................................................................. 45 Projected Parking Demand Based on ITE Parking Rates .................................................................................... 45 Projected Parking Demand Based on Site Survey ............................................................................................... 46 Parking Turnover Based on Site Survey ................................................................................................................. 46 8. DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUEING ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 53 Stacking Distance Required by City Municipal Code .......................................................................................... 53 Projected Queue Length Based on Site Survey ................................................................................................... 53 PC AGENDA PAGE 49 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis ii 19274 9. COLLISION HISTORY DATA REVIEW............................................................................................................ 58 10. VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................... 60 Background .................................................................................................................................................................... 60 VMT Assessment and Screening .............................................................................................................................. 60 11. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 61 Site Access ...................................................................................................................................................................... 61 Level of Service Improvements ................................................................................................................................. 61 General Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................ 61 Parking Demand Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 61 Parking Turnover Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 62 Drive-Through Queue Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 62 Collision History Review ............................................................................................................................................. 63 VMT Assessment .......................................................................................................................................................... 63 APPENDICES Appendix A Glossary Appendix B Scoping Agreement Appendix C Volume Count Data sheets Appendix D Level of Service Worksheets Appendix E Other Cumulative Development Location Map Appendix F ITE Parking Generation, City of Downey Municipal Code and Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan Appendix G Parking Occupancy Survey Count Data Sheets Appendix H Parking Turnover Survey Count Data Sheets Appendix I Drive-Through Lane Queueing Survey Count Data Sheets Appendix J Collision History Data Sheets PC AGENDA PAGE 50 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis iii 19274 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Annual Growth Rate Calculation ..................................................................................................................... 9 Table 2. Existing Levels of Service ................................................................................................................................ 10 Table 3. Project Trip Generation ................................................................................................................................... 20 Table 4. Other Development Trip Generation .......................................................................................................... 28 Table 5. Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service and Significant Impact Evaluation ................. 42 Table 6. Opening Year (2022) Without Project Intersection Levels of Service................................................ 43 Table 7. Opening Year (2022) With Project Intersection Levels of Service and Significant Impact Evaluation ............................................................................................................................................................ 44 Table 8. Parking Requirement Based on City of Downey Municipal Code and Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan ............................................................................................................... 48 Table 9. Project Parking Demand Based on ITE Parking Generation Rates ...................................................... 49 Table 10. Survey Site Parking Occupancy Summary.................................................................................................. 50 Table 11. Project Parking Demand Based on Observed Survey Site Parking Rates .......................................... 51 Table 12. Survey Site Parking Turnover Summary ..................................................................................................... 52 Table 13. Survey Site Drive-Through Queue Volume Summary ............................................................................ 55 Table 14. Project Drive-Through Queue Length Based on Observed Survey Queue Rates .......................... 56 Table 15. Three-Year (2016-2018) Collision Data Summary .................................................................................. 59 PC AGENDA PAGE 51 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis iv 19274 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project Location Map .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Site Plan .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3. Existing Lane Geometry and Intersection Traffic Controls .................................................................... 11 Figure 4. Existing Pedestrian Facilities .......................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 5. City of Downey Transit Routes ..................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 6. City of Downey General Plan Circulation Element .................................................................................. 14 Figure 7. City of Downey General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections ........................................................................ 15 Figure 8. Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................................... 16 Figure 9. Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ..................................................... 17 Figure 10. Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ..................................................... 18 Figure 11. Project Outbound Trip Distribution ............................................................................................................. 21 Figure 12. Project Inbound Trip Distribution ................................................................................................................. 22 Figure 13. Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................................... 23 Figure 14. Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ...................................................... 24 Figure 15. Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ...................................................... 25 Figure 16. Other Development Average Daily Traffic Volumes ............................................................................... 29 Figure 17. Other Development AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................. 30 Figure 18. Other Development PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .............................. 31 Figure 19. Existing Plus Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes ............................................................................... 32 Figure 20. Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................. 33 Figure 21. Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.............................. 34 Figure 22. Opening Year (2022) Without Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes .............................................. 35 Figure 23. Opening Year (2022) Without Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................................................................................................................................................... 36 Figure 24. Opening Year (2022) Without Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................................................................................................................................................... 37 Figure 25. Opening Year (2022) With Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes .................................................... 38 Figure 26. Opening Year (2022) With Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................................................................................................................................................... 39 Figure 27. Opening Year (2022) With Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................................................................................................................................................... 40 Figure 28. Average Drive-Through Weekday and Saturday Queue Lengths ....................................................... 57 Figure 29. Circulation Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 64 PC AGENDA PAGE 52 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis ES-1 19274 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this Traffic Impact Analysis is to provide an assessment of traffic operations resulting from development of the proposed Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project and to identify measures necessary to maintain roadway performance standards established by the City of Downey. This analysis also contains an assessment of the project vehicle miles travelled (VMT) impact in context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Although this is a technical report, effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. A glossary is provided in Appendix A to assist the reader with terms related to transportation engineering. Project Description The project site is located at 9002 Firestone Boulevard in the City of Downey, California. The project site is located south of Firestone Boulevard and east of Lakewood Boulevard. The project site is currently occupied by a 2,400 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive-through window. The proposed project consists of redeveloping the project site with a 1,698 square foot coffee shop with drive-through window. A right- in/right-out only access driveway is proposed on Lakewood Boulevard and another right-in/right-out only access driveway is proposed on Firestone Boulevard. The proposed project is anticipated to be constructed and fully operational by year 2022. Existing Operations The study intersection currently operates within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing 2020 base conditions (see Table 2). Project Trips The proposed project is forecast to result in a total of approximately 81 fewer daily vehicle trips, including 9 additional trips during the AM peak hour and 18 fewer trips during the PM peak hour. Overall, the proposed coffee shop project is anticipated to generate a total of 1,393 gross daily trips, including 151 AM peak hour gross trips and 74 PM peak hour gross trips. Forecast Operations The study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for all of the evaluated analysis scenarios. The proposed project is forecast to result in no Level of Service impacts at the study intersections for any of the evaluated analysis scenarios based on the City-established standards since with project conditions do not exceed the allowable increase in volume-to-capacity ratio. Therefore, no off-site improvements are recommended for the intersection of Lakewood Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard. Parking Demand Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer (ITE) parking rates, the 85th percentile weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 23 and 21 parking spaces, respectively, which exceeds the proposed parking supply of 18 parking spaces by five (5) parking spaces. It is anticipated that the 85th percentile parking demand will only occur occasionally for a short period of time during the AM and PM peak periods. The average weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 9 and 16 parking spaces, respectively. Since the proposed parking supply is 18 parking spaces, the project is anticipated to provide adequate parking supply to accommodate the typical average parking demand, though there may be short periods of time during the AM and PM peak hours where parking capacity is reached. PC AGENDA PAGE 53 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis ES-2 19274 Based on new survey data at three similar coffee shop locations and observed parking rates, the projected peak weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 16 and 14 parking spaces, respectively, which is a parking surplus of two (2) parking spaces with a proposed parking supply of 18 parking spaces. The projected 85th percentile weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 12 and 12 parking spaces, respectively, which is a parking surplus of six (6) parking spaces. The projected average weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 9 and 9 parking spaces, respectively, which is a parking surplus of nine (9) parking spaces. Since the proposed parking supply is 18 parking spaces, the project is anticipated to provide adequate parking supply to accommodate the projected parking demand based on the survey site data. It should be noted that due to current public health orders during COVID-19 pandemic, indoor dining is prohibited, which has greatly reduced the typical peak parking demand. Once these health orders are lifted at the pandemic, the parking demand will likely normalize to be more similar to the ITE parking rates. Parking Turnover Based on new survey data at three similar coffee shop locations, the time duration for each parked vehicles are recorded in terms of number of 15-minute interval parked at each stall. The average turnover are estimated based on the total time duration for all vehicles divided by the total number of parked vehicles at each survey site. The parking turnover rates are between 41.9 minutes to 61.6 minutes based on total number of parked vehicles including employees that will park their vehicles for a much longer duration than typical customers. Therefore, it would be more realistic to estimate the turnover rate for the proposed coffee shop based on customer data and exclude the employee data. For the customer parking turnover rates, it is assumed that the customers will have parking duration of 2 hours or less, which consists of approximately 82% to 93% of the total parked vehicles during the survey. The average customer parking turnover rates are 26.4 minutes during weekdays and 24.5 minutes during Saturdays. It should be noted that the turnover survey was conducted in number of 15-minute interval so the minimal turnover rate is 15 minutes which is a very conservative assumption, and it is likely that the actual turnover rates should be lower than the calculated average values. Drive-Through Queue Based on new survey data at three similar coffee shop locations, the surveyed drive-through lane queue rates are estimated based on the average queue length divided by the approximate building area of each survey site. The projected peak weekday and Saturday drive-through lane queue lengths for the proposed project are 14 and 18 vehicles, respectively, which is a queue length deficit of nine (9) vehicles with a proposed storage capacity of 9 vehicles. The projected 85th percentile weekday and Saturday drive-through lane queue lengths for the proposed project are 12 and 14 vehicles, respectively, which is a queue length deficit of five (5) vehicles. The projected average weekday and Saturday drive-through lane queue lengths for the proposed project are 9 and 10 vehicles, respectively, which is a queue length deficit of one (1) vehicle. It is also noted that due to current public health orders, indoor dining is prohibited, which has greatly increased the typical peak drive-through lane queue lengths during the recent survey. If necessary, this potential overflow could be accommodated on-site within the parking lot drive aisles internal to the project site. Therefore, drive through queueing is not anticipated to spill-over on the street. An option that the City is considering to limit vehicular access to the site off Firestone Boulevard only, with exiting only off Lakewood Boulevard on a permanent basis. Restricting the driveway on Lakewood Boulevard to exit-only will require all the inbound traffic to enter the project site at the driveway on Firestone Boulevard, and the access restriction will increase the right turn traffic on Firestone Stone into the project site. It is possible that the increased inbound traffic movement on Firestone Boulevard may potentially cause traffic to spill onto Firestone Boulevard during peak conditions without a second egress. It is recommended that both ingress and egress are provided at the both driveways on Firestone Boulevard and Lakewood Boulevard. PC AGENDA PAGE 54 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis ES-3 19274 Collision History Based on a review of collision history data near the intersection of Lakewood Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard for the three-year period from 2016 to 2018, there are a total of 38 reported collisions, including zero fatalities and 25 injury collisions with 36 injured persons. Year 2016 appears to have a very high collision rate with 27 collisions which is approximately 71% of the 3-year total. Year 2017 has lower collision rate with 9 collisions which is approximately 24% of the 3-year total. Year 2018 has a very low collision with only 2 collisions which is 5% of the 3-year. Another trend is that the number of broadside collisions, which are usually caused by right-of-way violations and typically result in more severe injuries, has decreased so that there are also less injury collisions. Based on review of historical imagery, it appears that turning path striping was added in early 2017 to the dual left turn lane movements on Firestone Boulevard and may be the reason for the reduction. The collision data shows a total of eight broadside crashes within a twelve-month period involving northbound left turn and southbound through vehicles between February 6, 2016 and February 4, 2017. Per Section 4C.08.B of the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), a change in traffic signal operation, such as conversion to full-protected left-turn phasing, should be considered if five or more reported crashes for types (i.e. left turning crashes) that may be susceptible to correction by said operation change have occurred within a twelve-month period. It should be noted that the City has a Capital Improvement Project currently in process which will construct northbound and southbound double left turn lanes on Lakewood Boulevard at Firestone Boulevard as well as converting the signal operation of the northbound and southbound left turn approaches from protected-permissive to fully-protected left-turn phasing. This protected left-turn phasing improvement is expected to improve traffic capacity at the intersection and to mitigate the frequency of the broadside collision involving the northbound and southbound left turning movements on Lakewood Boulevard. VMT Assessment The proposed project is considered a local-serving coffee shop that caters to customers located nearby or are already part of the through traffic along Lakewood Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard. The proposed coffee shop consists of less than 50,000 square feet of gross floor area, and it also replaces a larger existing restaurant building. Therefore, the proposed project is presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT since it satisfies one or more of the VMT screening criteria established by the County of Los Angeles. No additional VMT modeling or mitigation measures are required. PC AGENDA PAGE 55 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1 19274 1. INTRODUCTION This section describes the purpose of this traffic impact analysis, project location, proposed development, and study area. Figure 1 shows the project location map and Figure 2 illustrates the project site plan. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this traffic impact analysis is to provide an assessment of traffic operations resulting from development of the proposed Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project and to identify measures necessary to mitigate potentially significant traffic impacts. This report analyzes traffic impacts for the anticipated project opening year in 2022. Although this is a technical report, effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. A glossary is provided in Appendix A to assist the reader with terms related to transportation engineering. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located at 9002 Firestone Boulevard in the City of Downey, California. The project site is located south of Firestone Boulevard and east of Lakewood Boulevard. The project site is currently occupied by a 2,400 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive-through window. The proposed project consists of redeveloping the project site with a 1,698 square foot coffee shop with drive-through window. A right- in/right-out only access driveway is proposed on Lakewood Boulevard and another right-in/right-out only access driveway is proposed on Firestone Boulevard. The proposed project is anticipated to be constructed and fully operational by year 2022. STUDY AREA Based on the study intersections identified in the scoping agreement (Appendix B), the study area consists of the following study intersections within the City of Downey jurisdiction: Study Intersections1 Jurisdiction 1. Lakewood Boulevard (NS) at Firestone Boulevard (EW) Downey 2. Lakewood Boulevard (NS) at Project Driveway (EW) [Proposed] Downey 3. Project Driveway (NS) at Firestone Boulevard (EW) Downey ANALYSIS SCENARIOS The following scenarios are analyzed during typical weekday AM and PM peak hour conditions:  Existing 2020 Base Conditions  Existing 2020 Plus Project Conditions  Opening Year (2022) Without Project Conditions  Opening Year (2022) With Project Conditions 1 (NS) = North-South roadway; (EW) = East-West roadway 1 PC AGENDA PAGE 56 Figure 1 Project Location Map Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 Study Intersection Legend # 2 PC AGENDA PAGE 57 Figure 2 Site Plan Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N 3 PC AGENDA PAGE 58 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 4 19274 2. METHODOLOGY This section discusses the analysis methodologies used to assess transportation facility performance as adopted by the respective jurisdictional agencies. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION METHODOLOGY Analysis of signalized intersections within the City of Downey is based on the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. The ICU methodology compares the traffic volume using the intersection to the capacity of the intersection. The resulting volume-to-capacity ratio represents that portion of the hour required to provide sufficient capacity to accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches operate at capacity. The volume-to-capacity ratio is then correlated to a performance measure known as Level of Service based on the following thresholds: Level of Service Volume/Capacity Ratio A ≤ 0.600 B 0.601 to 0.700 C 0.701 to 0.800 D 0.801 to 0.900 E 0.901 to 1.000 F > 1.000 Source: Transportation Research Board, Interim Materials on Highway Capacity, Transportation Research Circular No. 212, January 1980. Level of Service is used to qualitatively describe the performance of a roadway facility, ranging from Level of Service A (free-flow conditions) to Level of Service F (extreme congestion and system failure). ICU analysis was performed using the Vistro (Version 6.00-00) software. Based on City of Downey/County of Los Angeles guidelines 2, the ICU analysis utilizes the following parameters: 1,600 vehicles per hour per lane for through and turn lanes, 2,880 vehicles per hour for dual left- turn lanes, and a total clearance adjustment of 10 percent (i.e., 0.10 added to critical Volume/Capacity). INTERSECTION DELAY METHODOLOGY The technique used to assess the performance of unsignalized intersections is known as the intersection delay methodology based on the procedures contained in the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 6th Edition). The methodology considers the traffic volume and distribution of movements, traffic composition, geometric characteristics, and signalization details to calculate the average control delay per vehicle and corresponding Level of Service. Control delay is defined as the portion of delay attributed to the intersection traffic control (such as a traffic signal or stop sign) and includes initial deceleration, queue move- up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The intersection control delay is then correlated to Level of Service based on the following thresholds: 2 County of Los Angeles Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Report Guidelines; December 2013. 4 PC AGENDA PAGE 59 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 5 19274 Level of Service Intersection Control Delay (Seconds / Vehicle) Unsignalized Intersection A ≤ 10.0 B > 10.0 to ≤ 15.0 C > 15.0 to ≤ 25.0 D > 25.0 to ≤ 35.0 E > 35.0 to ≤ 50.0 F > 50.0 Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition). Level of Service is used to qualitatively describe the performance of a roadway facility, ranging from Level of Service A (free-flow conditions) to Level of Service F (extreme congestion and system failure). At intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, Level of Service is determined by the average control delay for the overall intersection. At intersections with cross street stop control (i.e., one- or two-way stop control), Level of Service is determined by the average control delay for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane). Intersection delay analysis was performed using the Vistro (Version 6.00-00) software with default values recommended in the Highway Capacity Manual. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS City of Downey / County of Los Angeles. Both the City of Downey and County of Los Angeles have established Level of Service D as the minimum acceptable Level of Service. REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENTS For signalized study intersections, City of Downey and County of Los Angeles jurisdiction use the following table to determine if a project substantially contributes to a Level of Service deficiency and must provide improvements: Pre-Project Conditions Project Increase in V/C LOS V/C C 0.71 to 0.80 0.04 or more D 0.81 to 0.90 0.02 or more E/F 0.91 or more 0.01 or more The City of Downey General Plan requires that LOS D or better be maintained on Arterial Streets with certain exceptions. As such, intersections operating at LOS E or F will be considered deficient. A project must provide improvements at a signalized intersection if the addition of Project trips to an intersection that is currently operating at a deficient LOS (i.e., LOS E or F) causes the V/C to increase by 0.01 or more. For unsignalized intersection, based on review of the Los Angeles County Traffic Impact Analysis guidelines and the City’s Circulation Element, there are no specific criteria for the performance of unsignalized intersections. Therefore, for purposes of determining project-specific impacts of the proposed project at unsignalized intersections, the following criteria is provided: 5 PC AGENDA PAGE 60 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 6 19274  The project would create a significant impact at an unsignalized intersection if the addition of project- traffic would cause the intersection to operate from LOS D, or better in the baseline (pre-project) condition, to LOS E or F in the plus-project condition. A traffic signal warrant analysis shall be conducted to determine whether a traffic signal is warranted. If a traffic signal is warranted, the City may require the project applicant to pay its fair-share of fees to an applicable program (e.g., DIF, CIP, etc.) for the signalization of the intersection, when warranted.  If an unsignalized intersection is operating at LOS E or F in the baseline (pre-project) condition, the project would create a significant impact at that intersection if it contributes 10 percent, or more, to the total traffic volume of the impacted peak hour(s). A traffic signal warrant analysis shall be conducted to determine whether a traffic signal is warranted. If a traffic signal is warranted, the City may require the project applicant to pay its fair-share of fees to an applicable program (e.g., DIF, CIP, etc.) for the signalization of the intersection, when warranted. 6 PC AGENDA PAGE 61 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 7 19274 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM Figure 3 identifies the lane geometry and intersection traffic controls for Existing conditions based on a field survey of the study area. Regional access to the project area is provided by the Interstate 605 Freeway approximately one mile east of the project site and Interstate 105 approximately two miles to the south. The primary roadway providing local circulation is Lakewood Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard. Lakewood Boulevard is a 6-lane divided roadway. Lakewood Boulevard is classified as a Major Arterial in the City of Downey General Plan. On-street parking is generally prohibited on both sides of Lakewood Boulevard. Bicycle lanes are not provided on both sides of Lakewood Boulevard. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. Firestone Boulevard is a 6-lane divided roadway. Firestone Boulevard is classified as a Major Arterial in the City of Downey General Plan. On-street parking is generally prohibited on both sides of Firestone Boulevard. Bicycle lanes are not provided on both sides of Firestone Boulevard. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Existing pedestrian facilities in the project vicinity are shown on Figure 4. As shown on Figure 4, pedestrian sidewalks are currently provided along the roadways adjacent to the project site. BICYCLE ROUTES There are no on-street bicycle lanes on both sides of Lakewood Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard. TRANSIT FACILITIES Figure 5 shows the existing transit routes available in the project vicinity. TRUCK ROUTES Figure 6 shows the designated truck routes as identified in the City of Downey. GENERAL PLAN CONTEXT Figure 6 shows the City of Downey General Plan Circulation Element roadway classifications map. This figure shows the nature and extent of arterial and collector highways that are needed to adequately serve the ultimate development depicted by the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The City of Downey standard roadway cross-sections are illustrated on Figure 7. EXISTING (2020) TRAFFIC VOLUMES Due to abnormal traffic patterns associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, new traffic counts could not be conducted for this study since traffic patterns may not be normalized for an extended period of time. Therefore, the 2020 traffic volumes at the intersection of Lakewood Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard are estimated using available historic traffic data with an ambient growth rate. As shown in Table 1, the annual ambient growth rate of 1.0 percent is estimated based on the Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (CMP) General Traffic Volume Growth Factors for Year 2015 and Year 2020 for the Regional Statistical Area of Downey (RSA 9). The 2020 baseline volumes were estimated as follows: 7 PC AGENDA PAGE 62 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 8 19274  Lakewood Boulevard at Firestone Boulevard – 2015 intersection peak hour counts with 1.0% annual growth over 5 years (total growth factor = 1.052)  Lakewood Boulevard, south of Firestone Boulevard – 2016 segment 24-hour counts with 1.0% annual growth over 4 years (total growth factor = 1.041)  Firestone Boulevard, west of Lakewood Boulevard – 2016 segment 24-hour counts with 1.0% annual growth over 4 years (total growth factor = 1.041)  Firestone Boulevard, west of Woodruff Avenue – 2015 segment 24-hour counts with 1.0% annual growth over 5 years (total growth factor = 1.052) Figure 8 shows the Existing average daily traffic volumes. Historic 2015 and 2016 segment 24-hour count data sheets are provided in Appendix C. Existing peak hour traffic conditions are based upon AM and PM peak period intersection turning movement counts obtained in Downey during typical weekday conditions. The AM peak period was counted between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and the PM peak period was counted between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. The actual peak hour within the peak period is the four consecutive 15 minute periods with the highest total volume when all movements are added together. Thus, the weekday evening peak hour at one intersection may be 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM if those four consecutive 15 minute periods have the highest combined volume. Historic 2015 intersection turning movement count data sheets are provided in Appendix C. Figure 8 and Figure 10 show the Existing 2020 base AM peak hour and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes. EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE The Levels of Service for Existing 2020 base conditions are shown in Table 2. Detailed intersection Level of Service worksheets are provided in Appendix D. As shown in Table 2, the study intersection currently operates within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing conditions. 8 PC AGENDA PAGE 63 Year Growth Factor1 Year Growth Factor1 Years of Growth Growth Factor Growth Factor Growth Rate 22 Downey 2015 1.052 2020 1.104 5 1.052 1.010 1.0% (1)Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (CMP) General Traffic Volume Growth Factors (Exhibit D-1) Regional Statistical Area (RSA) Notes: Overall Growth Annual Growth Table 1 Annual Growth Rate Calculation Year 1 Year 2 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 192749PC AGENDA PAGE 64 V/C2 or [Delay]3 LOS4 V/C2 or [Delay]3 LOS4 1. Lakewood Ave at Firestone Blvd TS 0.702 C 0.785 C (3) Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. Delay is reported for unsignalized study intersections. For intersections with cross street stop control, Level of Service is based on average delay of the worst individual lane (or movements sharing a lane). (4) LOS = Level of Service Table 2 Existing Intersection Levels of Service ID Study Intersection Traffic Control1 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Notes: (1) TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop (2) V/C = Volume/Capacity Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927410PC AGENDA PAGE 65 Figure 3 Existing Lane Geometry and Intersection Traffic Controls Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 1 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 2 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Project Dwy (EW) 3 Project Dwy (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) ST O P STOP 6D 6D 6D 6D Traffic Signal Stop Sign #-Lane Divided Roadway Existing Lane Legend #D STOP 11 PC AGENDA PAGE 66 Figure 4 Existing Pedestrian Facilities Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTON E BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D Sidewalk Legend Cross Walk Bus StopB B B B B 12 PC AGENDA PAGE 67 Figure 5 City of Downey Transit Routes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Source: L.A. Metro Site 13 PC AGENDA PAGE 68 Figure 6 City of Downey General Plan Circulation Element Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Source: City of Downey Site 14 PC AGENDA PAGE 69 Figure 7 City of Downey General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 Source: City of Downey 15 PC AGENDA PAGE 70 Figure 8 Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D Vehicles Per Day (1,000's) Legend ## 45.1 40.2 38.2 38.9 38.9 16 PC AGENDA PAGE 71 Figure 9 Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 Study Intersection Legend # 1 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 94 12 1 8 33 9 16 3 85 1 30 2 2591032 127 183 915 272 17 PC AGENDA PAGE 72 Figure 10 Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 Study Intersection Legend # 1 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 19 7 10 8 5 24 9 31 1 12 3 4 28 1 2511104 226 197 908 243 18 PC AGENDA PAGE 73 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19 19274 4. PROJECT TRIP FORECASTS This section describes how project trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment forecasts were developed. The forecast project volumes are illustrated on figures contained in this section. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION The project site is located at 9002 Firestone Boulevard in the City of Downey. The project site is located south of Firestone Boulevard and east of Lakewood Boulevard. The project site is currently occupied by a 2,400 square foot fast-food restaurant that does not have a drive-through window. The proposed project consists of redeveloping the project site with a 1,698 square foot coffee shop with drive-through window. A right-in/right-out only access driveway is proposed on Lakewood Boulevard and another right-in/right-out only access driveway is proposed on Firestone Boulevard. The proposed project is anticipated to be constructed and fully operational by year 2022. Table 3 shows the project trip generation based upon standard rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017). Weekday daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour trip generation rates for Land Use Code 937 – Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window were used for the proposed project. The number of trips forecast to be generated by the proposed use is determined by multiplying the trip generation rates by the land use quantity. As shown in Table 3, the proposed coffee shop is forecast to generate 1,393 gross daily vehicle trips, including 151 gross trips during the AM peak hour and 74 gross trips during the PM peak hour. After accounting for pass-by credits and trips generated by the existing fast food restaurant to be displaced, the proposed project is forecast to result in a total of approximately 81 fewer daily vehicle trips, including 9 additional trips during the AM peak hour and 18 fewer trips during the PM peak hour. PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT Figure 11 and Figure 12 show the forecast outbound and inbound directional distribution patterns for the project generated trips. The project trip distribution patterns are based on review of existing volume data, surrounding land uses, designated truck routes, and the local and regional roadway facilities in the project vicinity. Based on the identified project trip generation and distributions, project average daily traffic volumes have been calculated and shown on Figure 13. Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes expected from the project are depicted on Figure 14 and Figure 15, respectively. PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES This analysis assumes the following improvements will be constructed by the project to provide project site access: Project Driveway (NS) at Lakewood Boulevard (EW)  Install a westbound cross street stop-control.  Construct the westbound approach to consist of one right-turn lane. Project Driveway (NS) at Firestone Boulevard (EW)  Install a northbound cross street stop-control.  Construct the northbound approach to consist of one right-turn lane. 19 PC AGENDA PAGE 74 No.Land Use Code¹ Units² In % Out % Total In % Out % Total 1 Fast-Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window ITE 933 TSF 60% 40% 25.10 50% 50% 28.34 346.23 2 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window ITE 937 TSF 51% 49% 88.99 50% 50% 43.38 820.38 No.Land Use In Out Total In Out Total Existing Land Use3 1 Fast-Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window 2.400 TSF 36 24 60 34 34 68 831 Pass-By Trips4 40%4 -14 -10 -24 -14 -14 -28 -332 22 14 36 20 20 40 499 Proposed Project 2 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window 1.698 TSF 77 74 151 37 37 74 1,393 Pass-By Trips4 70%4 -54 -52 -106 -26 -26 -52 -975 23 22 45 11 11 22 418 +1 +8 +9 -9 -9 -18 -81 (1) (2) (3) (4) A more conservative (lower) pass-by trip reduction percentage is utilized in the trip generation calculations. Table E.31, Land Use Code 934 - Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window, Average Pass-By Trip Percentage = 49%. Table E.34, Land Use Code 938 - Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window, Average Pass-By Trip Percentage = 89%. Table 3 Project Trip Generation Trip Generation Rates Project Off-Site Net Trips (Off-Site Intersections #1) Trips Generated Quantity² Total Existing Trips Total Proposed Trips Notes: ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017; ### = Land Use Code TSF = Thousand Square Feet Existing trip credit for existing building estimated based on approximate building size. Pass-By Trips: ITE, Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, 2017. Project AM Peak PM Peak Daily Project AM Peak PM Peak Daily Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927420PC AGENDA PAGE 75 Figure 11 Project Outbound Trip Distribution Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 50% 50% 50% 5% 45% Percent From Project Legend 10% 21 PC AGENDA PAGE 76 Figure 12 Project Inbound Trip Distribution Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 50% 50% 50% 25% 25% Percent To Project Legend 10% 22 PC AGENDA PAGE 77 Figure 13 Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D Vehicles Per Day (1,000's) Legend ## 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.4 23 PC AGENDA PAGE 78 Figure 14 Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 Study Intersection Legend # 1 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 0 4 0 000 00 0 0 0 0 2 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Project Dwy (EW) 0 39 0 37 3 Project Dwy (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 370 38 0 24 PC AGENDA PAGE 79 Figure 15 Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 Study Intersection Legend # 1 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 0 -4 0 -200 0-2 0 0 0 0 2 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Project Dwy (EW) 0 19 0 19 3 Project Dwy (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 180 18 0 25 PC AGENDA PAGE 80 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 26 19274 5. FUTURE VOLUME FORECASTS This section describes how future volume forecasts for each analysis scenario were developed. Forecast study area volumes are illustrated on figures contained in this section. CUMULATIVE TRIPS Ambient Growth Rate To account for ambient growth on roadways, existing 2020 base volumes were increased by a growth rate of one percent (1%) per year over a two-year period for Opening Year (2022) conditions. This equates to a total growth factor of approximately 1.02 for Opening Year. The ambient growth rate was conservatively applied to all movements at the study intersections. Other Development To account for trips generated by future development, trips generated by pending or approved other development projects in the City of Downey were added to the study area. Table 4 shows the trip generation summary for other development projects. The other cumulative development trip generation is estimated based on the ITE trip generation rates. The locations of each other cumulative developments are identified with respect to the proposed project site and the project study area intersections to estimate their impacts to the project study roadways. Appendix E shows the locations of the other cumulative developments. If available, the traffic studies for the other cumulative developments are researched and reviewed. Typically, the trip distribution patterns for these other cumulative developments are estimated based on a review of the surrounding land uses in terms of attractions and most probable travel routes that may affect the future traffic for the study roadways. The previously discussed ambient growth is assumed to account for any additional trips generated by other development projects located outside the project vicinity and not specifically listed in this report. Figure 16 shows the forecast average daily traffic volumes for the other development. Figure 17 and Figure 18 show the forecast AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes for trips generated by other developments. ANALYSIS SCENARIO VOLUME FORECASTS Existing 2020 Plus Project Existing 2020 Plus Project volume forecasts were derived by adding the project generated trips to Existing volumes. Existing 2020 Plus Project average daily traffic volumes are shown on Figure 19. Existing 2020 Plus Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 20 and Figure 21. Opening Year (2022) Without Project To develop Opening Year (2022) Without Project volume forecasts, Existing volumes were combined with ambient growth and trips generated by other developments. Opening Year (2022) Without Project average daily traffic volumes are shown on Figure 22. Opening Year (2022) Without Project AM and PM hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown Figure 23 and Figure 24. 26 PC AGENDA PAGE 81 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 27 19274 Opening Year (2022) With Project Opening Year (2022) With Project volume forecasts were developed by adding project generated trips to the Opening Year (2022) Without Project forecast. Opening Year (2022) With Project average daily traffic volumes are shown on Figure 25. Opening Year (2022) With Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 26 and Figure 27. 27 PC AGENDA PAGE 82 No.Land Use Code¹ Units² In % Out % Rate In %2 Out %3 Rate2 Daily 1 Suites Hotel ITE 311 RM 53% 47% 0.34 48% 52% 0.36 4.46 2 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) Residential ITE 220 DU 23% 77% 0.46 63% 37% 0.56 7.32 3 Warehousing ITE 150 TSF 77% 23% 0.17 27% 73% 0.19 1.74 4 General Office Building ITE 710 TSF 86% 14% 1.16 16% 84% 1.15 9.74 5 Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window ITE 934 TSF 51% 49% 40.19 52% 48% 32.67 470.95 6 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) Residential ITE 221 DU 26% 74% 0.36 61% 39% 0.44 5.44 7 Senior Housing - Detached ITE 251 DU 33% 67% 0.24 61% 39% 0.30 4.27 8 Hospital ITE 610 TSF 68% 32% 0.89 32% 68% 0.97 10.72 9 Discount Supermarket ITE 854 TSF 58% 42% 2.53 50% 50% 8.38 90.87 10 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window ITE 937 TSF 51% 49% 88.99 50% 50% 43.38 820.38 No.Land Use In Out Total In Out Total 1 Suites Hotel 140 RM 25 22 47 24 27 51 624 2 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) Residential 12 DU 1 4 5 4 3 7 88 3 Warehousing 43.905 TSF 6 2 8 2 6 8 76 General Office Building 7.628 TSF 8 1 9 1 7 8 74 14 3 17 3 13 16 150 4 Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window 4.000 TSF 82 79 161 68 63 131 1,884 5 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) Residential 38 DU 3 10 13 10 6 16 207 6 Senior Housing - Detached 62 DU 5 10 15 11 7 18 265 7 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) Residential 24 DU 3 8 11 8 5 13 176 8 Hospital 141.364 TSF 86 40 126 44 93 137 1,515 9 Discount Supermarket 19.200 TSF 28 20 48 80 80 160 1,745 Pass-By Trips3 20%4 -6 -4 -10 -16 -16 -32 -349 22 16 38 64 64 128 1,396 10 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window 3.200 TSF 145 140 285 69 69 138 2,625 Pass-By Trips3 70%4 -102 -98 -200 -48 -48 -96 -1,838 43 42 85 21 21 42 787 11 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window 3.200 TSF 145 140 285 69 69 138 2,625 Pass-By Trips3 70%4 -102 -98 -200 -48 -48 -96 -1,838 43 42 85 21 21 42 787 (1) (2) (3) Total Proposed Trips A more conservative (lower) pass-by trip reduction percentage is utilized in the trip generation calculations. Quantity² Other Development AM Peak PM Peak Daily Other Development Project Trips Generated Table 4 Other Development Trip Generation Other Development Project Trip Generation Rates Project AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total Proposed Trips - ALDI Total Proposed Trips - Dunkin' Donuts RM = Room, DU = Dwelling Unit, TSF = Thousand Square Feet Pass-By Trips: ITE, Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, 2017. Table E.34, Land Use Code 938 - Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window, Average Pass-By Trip Percentage = 89%. Total Proposed Trips - Randy's Donuts Table E.17, Land Use Code 854 - Discount Supermarket, Average Pass-By Trip Percentage = 21%. Notes: ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual , 10th Edition, 2017. Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927428PC AGENDA PAGE 83 Figure 16 Other Development Average Daily Traffic Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D Vehicles Per Day (1,000's) Legend ## 1.1 1.7 1.6 1.5 2.1 29 PC AGENDA PAGE 84 Figure 17 Other Development AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 Study Intersection Legend # 1 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 2 8 3 3140 09 4 2 9 2 2 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Project Dwy (EW) 13 0 20 0 3 Project Dwy (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 111 14 2 1 Lakewood Ave (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 9 8 14 142011 1514 21 19 31 13 2 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Project Dwy (EW) 35 0 60 0 3 Project Dwy (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 1147 14 52 30 PC AGENDA PAGE 85 Figure 18 Other Development PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 Study Intersection Legend # 1 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 5 13 2 270 09 2 3 10 3 2 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Project Dwy (EW) 20 0 12 0 3 Project Dwy (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 132 11 2 1 Lakewood Ave (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 8 13 7 7235 2125 23 24 20 8 2 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Project Dwy (EW) 30 0 70 0 3 Project Dwy (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 1339 11 38 31 PC AGENDA PAGE 86 Figure 19 Existing Plus Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D Vehicles Per Day (1,000's) Legend ## 45.6 40.6 38.4 39.3 39.3 32 PC AGENDA PAGE 87 Figure 20 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 Study Intersection Legend # 1 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 94 12 2 2 33 9 16 3 85 1 30 2 2591032 127 183 915 272 2 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Project Dwy (EW) 16 5 1 39 11 6 1 37 3 Project Dwy (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 371534 38 1371 33 PC AGENDA PAGE 88 Figure 21 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 Study Intersection Legend # 1 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 19 7 10 8 1 24 9 30 9 12 3 4 28 1 2511102 226 197 908 243 2 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Project Dwy (EW) 15 3 1 19 16 5 7 19 3 Project Dwy (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 181664 18 1348 34 PC AGENDA PAGE 89 Figure 22 Opening Year (2022) Without Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D Vehicles Per Day (1,000's) Legend ## 47.0 42.7 40.6 41.1 41.8 35 PC AGENDA PAGE 90 Figure 23 Opening Year (2022) Without Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 Study Intersection Legend # 1 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 98 12 5 0 34 9 16 9 88 2 30 8 2641062 134 189 942 279 1 Lakewood Ave (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 10 3 12 5 0 36 0 18 0 88 8 31 3 2741046 148 206 946 290 36 PC AGENDA PAGE 91 Figure 24 Opening Year (2022) Without Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 Study Intersection Legend # 1 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 20 6 11 2 0 25 6 31 9 12 6 6 28 7 2561135 233 204 936 251 1 Lakewood Ave (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 20 5 11 2 0 26 1 32 4 12 8 2 28 6 2721129 249 225 928 256 37 PC AGENDA PAGE 92 Figure 25 Opening Year (2022) With Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D Vehicles Per Day (1,000's) Legend ## 47.5 43.1 40.8 41.5 42.1 38 PC AGENDA PAGE 93 Figure 26 Opening Year (2022) With Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 Study Intersection Legend # 1 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 98 12 5 4 34 9 16 9 88 2 30 8 2641062 134 189 942 279 2 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Project Dwy (EW) 16 9 7 39 12 0 4 37 3 Project Dwy (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 481566 52 1400 1 Lakewood Ave (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 10 7 12 5 4 36 0 18 0 88 8 31 3 2741065 148 206 946 290 2 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Project Dwy (EW) 16 8 6 39 12 2 1 37 3 Project Dwy (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 481581 52 1423 39 PC AGENDA PAGE 94 Figure 27 Opening Year (2022) With Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 Study Intersection Legend # 1 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 20 6 11 1 6 25 6 31 7 12 6 6 28 7 2561133 233 204 936 251 2 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Project Dwy (EW) 15 8 2 19 17 0 2 19 3 Project Dwy (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 311699 29 1377 1 Lakewood Ave (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 20 7 11 1 6 26 1 32 2 12 8 2 28 6 2721138 249 225 928 256 2 Lakewood Blvd (NS)/ Project Dwy (EW) 15 6 1 19 17 2 7 19 3 Project Dwy (NS)/ Firestone Blvd (EW) 311703 29 1386 40 PC AGENDA PAGE 95 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 41 19274 6. FUTURE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Detailed intersection Level of Service calculation worksheets for each of the following analysis scenarios are provided in Appendix D. EXISTING 2020 PLUS PROJECT The Levels of Service for Existing Plus Project conditions are shown in Table 5. As shown in Table 5, the study intersections are forecast to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Project conditions. As also shown in Table 5, the proposed project is forecast to result in no Level of Service impacts at the study intersections for Existing Plus Project conditions based on the City-established standards since with project conditions do not exceed the allowable increase in volume-to-capacity ratio.. OPENING YEAR (2022) WITHOUT PROJECT The Levels of Service for Opening Year (2022) Without Project conditions are shown in Table 6. As shown in Table 6, the study intersection is forecast to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year (2022) Without Project conditions. OPENING YEAR (2022) WITH PROJECT The Levels of Service for Opening Year (2022) With Project conditions are shown in Table 7. As shown in Table 7, the study intersections are forecast to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year (2022) With Project conditions. As also shown in Table 7, the proposed project is forecast to result in no Level of Service impacts at the study intersections for Opening Year (2022) With Project conditions based on the City-established standards since with project conditions do not exceed the allowable increase in volume-to-capacity ratio. 41 PC AGENDA PAGE 96 V/C2 or [Delay]3 LOS4 V/C2 or [Delay]3 LOS4 V/C2 or [Delay]3 LOS4 V/C2 or [Delay]3 LOS4 1. Lakewood Blvd at Firestone Blvd TS 0.702 C 0.703 C +0.001 No 0.785 C 0.782 C -0.003 No 2. Lakewood Blvd at Project Dwy CSS [0.0] A [21.5] C +[21.5] No [0.0] A [17.8] C +[17.8] No 3. Project Dwy at Firestone Blvd CSS [0.0] A [20.4] C +[20.4] No [0.0] A [19.4] C +[19.4] No Table 5 Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service and Significant Impact Evaluation ID Study Intersection Traffic Control1 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Without Project With Project Project Change LO S Im p a c t ? Without Project With Project Project Change (4) LOS = Level of Service LO S Im p a c t ? Notes: (1) TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop (2) V/C = Volume/Capacity (3) Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. Delay is reported for unsignalized study intersections. For intersections with cross street stop control, Level of Service is based on average delay of the worst individual lane (or movements sharing a lane). Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927442PC AGENDA PAGE 97 V/C2 or [Delay]3 LOS4 V/C2 or [Delay]3 LOS4 1. Lakewood Ave at Firestone Blvd TS 0.718 C 0.810 D (3) Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. Delay is reported for unsignalized study intersections. For intersections with cross street stop control, Level of Service is based on average delay of the worst individual lane (or movements sharing a lane). (4) LOS = Level of Service Table 6 Opening Year (2022) Without Project Intersection Levels of Service ID Study Intersection Traffic Control1 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Notes: (1) TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop (2) V/C = Volume/Capacity Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927443PC AGENDA PAGE 98 V/C2 or [Delay]3 LOS4 V/C2 or [Delay]3 LOS4 V/C2 or [Delay]3 LOS4 V/C2 or [Delay]3 LOS4 1. Lakewood Blvd at Firestone Blvd TS 0.718 C 0.731 C +0.013 No 0.810 D 0.810 C - No 2. Lakewood Blvd at Project Dwy CSS [0.0] A [22.1] C +[22.1] No [0.0] A [18.1] C +[18.1] No 3. Project Dwy at Firestone Blvd CSS [0.0] A [22.2] C +[22.2] No [0.0] A [20.9] C +[20.9] No Table 7 Opening Year (2022) With Project Intersection Levels of Service and Significant Impact Evaluation ID Study Intersection Traffic Control1 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour (4) LOS = Level of Service Without Project With Project Project Change Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t ? Without Project With Project Project Change Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t ? Notes: (1) TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop (2) V/C = Volume/Capacity (3) Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. Delay is reported for unsignalized study intersections. For intersections with cross street stop control, Level of Service is based on average delay of the worst individual lane (or movements sharing a lane). Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927444PC AGENDA PAGE 99 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 45 19274 7. PARKING ANALYSIS The average and peak parking demand for the proposed coffee shop project is estimated based on the parking rates published in the Institute of Transportation of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual (5th Edition, 2019), which is more stringent than the City of Downey Municipal Parking Code and more reasonable than the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan since it is based on current parking demand standards. The proposed project consists of redeveloping the project site with a 1,698 square foot coffee shop with drive-through window. The project site also shows an outdoor seating area of approximately 100 square feet. The project’s parking lot has one accessible parking stall with 17 standard parking stalls for a total parking supply of 18 parking spaces. PARKING REQUIRED BY CITY MUNICIPAL CODE The typical City of Downey Municipal Parking Code for an eating and drinking establishment with drive- through window is one parking space per 100 square feet of gross floor area (or 10 spaces per 1,000 square feet). Since the project site is located within the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan, the parking requirement is one parking space per 50 square feet (or 20 spaces per 1,000 square feet) of floor area including the outdoor seating area, which is twice as much as the City Municipal Code. Table 8 shows parking requirement based on City of Downey Municipal Code and the parking requirements for the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan. As shown in Table 8, the City Municipal Code requires 18 parking spaces and the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan requires 36 parking spaces. Since the proposed project will provide a total of 18 on-site parking spaces, there is a parking deficit of 18 parking spaces based on the City’s parking requirements. PROJECTED PARKING DEMAND BASED ON ITE PARKING RATES Table 9 shows the average and 85th percentile project parking demand calculation using the peak parking rates based on the ITE Parking Generation Manual (5th Edition, 2019). The Parking Generation Manual average and peak parking rates are based on an accumulation of parking survey data collected by the ITE from various land uses, and the peak parking rates are considered an industry standard in parking generation estimation. For a coffee shop with drive-through window (ITE code 937), the ITE weekday average parking rate is 5.22 vehicles per 1,000 square feet (TSF) and the ITE weekday 85th percentile parking rate is 12.52 vehicles per TSF. For weekends, the ITE Saturday average parking rate is 8.70 vehicles per TSF and the ITE Saturday peak parking rate is 11.85 vehicles per TSF. The ITE parking rates appear to be more stringent than the City of Downey Municipal Parking Code, but more reasonable than the parking requirements for the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan. Appendix F contains the ITE parking generation rates, the City Municipal Code Parking Ordinance, and the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan parking requirements. As shown in Table 9, the 85th percentile weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 23 and 21 parking spaces, respectively, which exceeds the proposed parking supply of 18 parking spaces by five (5) parking spaces. It is anticipated that the 85th percentile parking demand will only occur occasionally for a short period of time during the AM and PM peak periods. It is also noted that due to current public health orders, indoor dining is prohibited, which has greatly reduced the typical peak parking demand. As shown in Table 9, the average weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 9 and 16 parking spaces, respectively. Since the proposed parking supply is 18 parking spaces, the project is anticipated to provide adequate parking supply to accommodate the typical average parking demand, though there may be short periods of time during the AM and PM peak hours where parking capacity is reached. 45 PC AGENDA PAGE 100 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 46 19274 PROJECTED PARKING DEMAND BASED ON SITE SURVEY The peak parking demand is estimated based on survey data at three similar coffee shop locations. Field observations of parking occupancy were conducted at the following existing Starbucks coffee shops in September 2020:  Downey, CA – 7966 Florence Avenue, Downey, CA 90240  Whittier, CA – 14940 Whittier Boulevard, Whittier CA 90605  La Mirada, CA – 15010 Imperial Highway, La Mirada, CA 90638 The parking occupancy were observed and documented in 15-minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 1:00 PM on a typical weekday. Appendix G includes the parking occupancy survey data. Table 10 summarizes the surveyed parking occupancy collected at the three Starbucks coffee shop locations. The surveyed parking demand rates are estimated based on the number of occupied parking spaces divided by the approximate building area of each survey site. As shown in Table 10, the parking demand rates are calculated to be as follows:  Peak parking demand rates: □ 8.70 spaces per TSF for weekdays; and, □ 7.78 spaces per TSF for Saturdays.  85th percentile parking demand rates: □ 6.56 spaces per TSF for weekdays; and, □ 6.48 spaces per TSF for Saturdays.  Average parking rates: □ 4.98 spaces per TSF for weekdays; and, □ 4.85 spaces per TSF for Saturdays. As shown in Table 11, the projected peak weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 16 and 14 parking spaces, respectively, which is a parking surplus of two (2) parking spaces with a proposed parking supply of 18 parking spaces. The projected 85th percentile weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 12 and 12 parking spaces, respectively, which is a parking surplus of six (6) parking spaces. The projected average weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 9 and 9 parking spaces, respectively, which is a parking surplus of nine (9) parking spaces. Since the proposed parking supply is 18 parking spaces, the project is anticipated to provide adequate parking supply to accommodate the projected parking demand based on the survey site data. It should be noted that due to current public health orders during COVID-19 pandemic, indoor dining is prohibited, which has greatly reduced the typical peak parking demand. Once these health orders are lifted at the pandemic, the parking demand will likely normalize to be more similar to the ITE parking rates. PARKING TURNOVER BASED ON SITE SURVEY The parking turnover rates were also determined based on survey data at the same three locations noted above. The parking durations were observed and documented in 15-minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 1:00 PM on a typical weekday. Appendix H includes the parking turnover survey data. Table 12 summarizes the surveyed parking turnover collected at the three Starbucks coffee shop locations. The time duration was recorded in 15-minute intervals for each occupied parking stall. The average turnover was estimated based on the total time duration for all vehicles divided by the total number of parked vehicles at each survey site. As shown in Table 12, the parking turnover rates are between 41.9 minutes to 61.6 46 PC AGENDA PAGE 101 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 47 19274 minutes based on total number of parked vehicles including employees that will park their vehicles for a much longer duration than typical customers. Therefore, it would be more realistic to estimate the turnover rate for the proposed coffee shop based on customer data and exclude the employee data. For the customer parking turnover rates, it is assumed that the customers will have parking duration of 2 hours or less, which consists of approximately 82% to 93% of the total parked vehicles during the survey. As shown in Table 12, the average customer parking turnover rates are 26.4 minutes during weekdays and 24.5 minutes during Saturdays. It should be noted that the turnover survey was conducted in number of 15-minute interval so the minimal turnover rate is 15 minutes which is a very conservative assumption, and it is likely that the actual turnover rates should be lower than the calculated average values shown in Table 12. 47 PC AGENDA PAGE 102 Proposed Use Component Quantity 1 Units2 Parking Spaces Eating and Drinking Establishment with Drive-Through Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 1 Space : 100 SF 18 Restaurant with Drive-Through Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 1 Space : 50 SF 36 18 -18 (1) (2) (3) (4) Available Parking Supply, including 1 accessible parknig stall and 17 standard parking stalls [See Figure 2] Parking Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) for the Proposed Project City of Downey Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan 91-2, March 1992, Section F.1, Restaurant with Drive-Through - 1 space per 50 square feet of gross floor area and outdoor seating area. Notes: Gross floor area is 1,698 square feet and the outdoor seating area is approximately 100 square feet for a total of 1,798 square feet. SF = Square Feet City of Downey Municipal Code, Table 9.7.3, Eating and Drinking Establishment with Drive-Through - 1 space per 100 square feet of gross floor area and outdoor seating area. Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan4 Table 8 Parking Requirement Based on City of Downey Municipal Code and Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan Parking Rate Source Parking Requirement Typical City Municipal Code3 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927448PC AGENDA PAGE 103 Proposed Use Component Quantity 1 Units2 Parking Spaces Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 12.52 Space : 1,000 SF 23 Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 11.85 Space : 1,000 SF 21 Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 5.22 Space : 1,000 SF 9 Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 8.70 Space : 1,000 SF 16 18 -5 +2 (1) (2) (3) Table 9 Project Parking Demand Based on ITE Parking Generation Rates Parking Rate Source Parking Requirement Notes: SF = Square Feet Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition, January 2019, Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window (937), peak period parking demand per 1,000 square feet gross floor area. ITE Weekday Average3 ITE Weekday 85th Percentile3 ITE Saturday Average3 ITE Saturday 85th Percentile3 Available Parking Supply, including 1 accessible parknig stall and 17 standard parking stalls [See Figure 2] Parking Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) for the Proposed Project Comparing to Average Parking Rates Parking Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) for the Proposed Project Comparing to 85th Percentile Parking Rates Gross floor area is 1,698 square feet and the outdoor seating area is approximately 100 square feet for a total of 1,798 square feet. Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927449PC AGENDA PAGE 104 Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 8 8 9 4 6 7 7.7 6.3 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 9 9 9 5 6 7 8.0 7.0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 6 8 8 5 5 9 6.3 7.3 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 7 8 9 6 7 7 7.7 7.0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 8 10 12 7 9 10 9.7 9.0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 7 9 11 5 11 10 9.7 8.0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 7 9 8 7 9 7 8.0 7.7 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 12 12 12 6 10 7 11.3 8.3 9:00 AM - 9:15 AM 12 11 7 5 10 9 9.7 8.3 9:15 AM - 9:30 AM 8 12 12 7 12 10 10.7 9.7 9:30 AM - 9:45 AM 12 9 9 7 9 8 10.0 8.0 9:45 AM - 10:00 AM 13 13 15 6 8 9 12.0 9.3 10:00 AM - 10:15 AM 8 15 13 9 8 8 9.7 10.7 10:15 AM - 10:30 AM 10 17 10 6 6 5 8.7 9.3 10:30 AM - 10:45 AM 12 14 9 4 5 3 8.7 7.0 10:45 AM - 11:00 AM 20 16 9 6 2 4 10.3 8.7 11:00 AM - 11:15 AM 13 14 8 7 5 5 8.7 8.7 11:15 AM - 11:30 AM 16 16 8 8 5 5 9.7 9.7 11:30 AM - 11:45 AM 12 18 8 8 5 3 8.3 9.7 11:45 AM - 12:00 PM 11 16 8 7 5 3 8.0 8.7 12:00 PM - 12:15 PM 16 18 6 9 4 6 8.7 11.0 12:15 PM - 12:30 PM 13 18 9 5 6 3 9.3 8.7 12:30 PM - 12:45 PM 12 23 8 8 3 4 7.7 11.7 12:45 PM - 1:00 PM 14 19 7 6 3 4 8.0 9.7 1:00 PM - 1:15 PM 14 20 7 4 3 3 8.0 9.0 20 23 15 9 12 10 12 11.7 14.0 18.0 12.0 8.0 9.4 9.0 10.1 9.7 11.2 13.7 9.2 6.3 6.5 6.2 9.0 8.7 9/30/20 9/26/20 9/30/20 9/26/20 9/30/20 9/26/20 Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday 11.11 12.78 8.33 5.00 6.67 5.56 8.70 7.78 7.78 10.00 6.67 4.44 5.22 5.00 6.56 6.48 6.22 7.60 5.13 3.49 3.60 3.47 4.98 4.85 Table 10 Survey Site Parking Occupancy Summary Time Period Number of Parked Vehicles 1 - Downey, CA 2 - Whittier, CA 3 - La Mirada, CA Average Maximum 85th Percentile Average Building Area (SF1)1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 Average Parking Rate Note: (1) SF = Square Feet Survey Date 9/26-30/2020 1 - Downey, CA 2 - Whittier, CA 3 - La Mirada, CA AverageObserved Parking Rate (Space per 1,000 SF) Peak Parking Rate 85th Percentile Parking Rate Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927450PC AGENDA PAGE 105 Proposed Use Component Quantity 1 Units2 Parking Spaces Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 8.70 Space : 1,000 SF 16 Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 7.78 Space : 1,000 SF 14 Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 6.56 Space : 1,000 SF 12 Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 6.48 Space : 1,000 SF 12 Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 4.98 Space : 1,000 SF 9 Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 4.85 Space : 1,000 SF 9 18 +2 +6 +9 (1) (2) (3) Table 11 Project Parking Demand Based on Observed Survey Site Parking Rates Observed Survey Site Parking Rate Observed Parking Rates Observed Weekday 85th Percentile3 Gross floor area is 1,698 square feet and the outdoor seating area is approximately 100 square feet for a total of 1,798 square feet. SF = Square Feet Observed average weekday and Saturday parking rates at 3 similar survey sites in Downey, Whittier and La Mirada based on count data collected during September 26 to September 30, 2020 (see Table 10). Observed Weekday Peak3 Observed Saturday Peak3 Parking Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) for the Proposed Project Comparing to Peak Parking Rates Observed Weekday Average3 Observed Saturday Average3 Available Parking Supply, including 1 accessible parknig stall and 17 standard parking stalls [See Figure 2] Parking Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) for the Proposed Project Comparing to 85th Percentile Parking Rates Parking Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) for the Proposed Project Comparing to Average Parking Rates Notes: Observed Saturday 85th Percentile3 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927451PC AGENDA PAGE 106 Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday 1 / 0:15 55 54 38 28 30 24 58.9% 60.9% 2 / 0:30 20 15 9 4 7 7 17.2% 14.9% 3 / 0:45 5 4 2 1 5 0 5.7% 2.9% 4 / 1:00 1 3 1 3 4 0 2.9% 3.4% 5 / 1:15 2 2 0 1 4 0 2.9% 1.7% 6 / 1:30 0 2 0 0 2 0 1.0% 1.1% 7 / 1:45 0 0 1 1 2 0 1.4% 0.6% 8 / 2:00 0 1 2 1 0 0 1.0% 1.1% 9 / 2:15 0 2 0 0 2 0 1.0% 1.1% 10 / 2:30 1 0 0 0 1 0 1.0% 0.0% 11 / 2:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.0% 0.6% 12 / 3:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.5% 0.6% 13 / 3:15 1 1 0 0 1 2 1.0% 1.7% 14 / 3:30 0 1 1 1 0 2 0.5% 2.3% 15 / 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 16 / 4:00 0 2 0 1 0 0 0.0% 1.7% 17 / 4:15 1 1 1 0 0 0 1.0% 0.6% 18 / 4:30 0 0 2 0 0 0 1.0% 0.0% 19 / 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 20 / 5:00 1 0 0 1 0 1 0.5% 1.1% 21 / 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.0% 0.6% 22 / 5:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 23 / 5:45 0 1 1 0 0 1 0.5% 1.1% 24 / 6:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.5% 0.0% 25 / 6:15 2 2 2 1 0 0 1.9% 1.7% 91 92 60 44 58 38 209 174 4,050 4,755 3,435 2,355 2,430 2,340 9,915 9,450 44.5 51.7 57.3 53.5 41.9 61.6 47.4 54.3 9/30/20 9/26/20 9/30/20 9/26/20 9/30/20 9/26/20 83 81 53 39 54 31 190 151 91% 88% 88% 89% 93% 82% 91% 87% 1,860 2,070 1,335 1,065 1,815 570 5,010 3,705 22.4 25.6 25.2 27.3 33.6 18.4 26.4 24.5 Note: (1) Customer vehicles are assumed to have parking duration of 2 hours or less, which consists of approximately 82% to 93% of the total vehicles. Employee vehicles will park for much longer duration, which will skew the overall parking duration and turnover. Total Customer1 Vehicles Total Customer Duration (Minutes) Average Customer Turnover Percent of Total Vehicles1 Total Parked Vehicles Total Duration (Minutes) Average Turnover Survey Date 9/26-30/2020 Table 12 Survey Site Parking Turnover Summary Number of 15-Minute Interval / Time Duration (hour:minute) Number of Parked Vehicles 1 - Downey, CA 2 - Whittier, CA 3 - La Mirada, CA Percent Distribution Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927452PC AGENDA PAGE 107 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 53 19274 8. DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUEING ANALYSIS The average and peak drive-through lane queueing lengths are estimated based on new survey data collected at three similar coffee shop locations. The proposed project consists of redeveloping the project site with a 1,698 square foot coffee shop with drive-through window. The project site also shows an outdoor seating area of approximately 100 square feet. The project’s parking lot has one accessible parking stall with 17 standard parking stalls for a total parking supply of 18 parking spaces. The site plan shows that the drive-through lane can accommodate approximately 9 vehicles. STACKING DISTANCE REQUIRED BY CITY MUNICIPAL CODE In the City of Downey Municipal Code, the minimum number of stacking spaces for a coffee shop is four spaces before the order board and 4 spaces between order board and the pick-up window. Since the project is providing a drive-through lane that can accommodate approximately 9 vehicles, the project satisfies the stacking distance required by City of Downey Municipal Code. PROJECTED QUEUE LENGTH BASED ON SITE SURVEY The average and peak drive-through lane queueing lengths are estimated based on new survey data at same three similar coffee shop locations observed for the parking surveys. Field observations of drive-through lane queues were conducted at the following existing Starbucks coffee shops in September 2020:  Downey, CA – 7966 Florence Avenue, Downey, CA 90240  Whittier, CA – 14940 Whittier Boulevard, Whittier CA 90605  La Mirada, CA – 15010 Imperial Highway, La Mirada, CA 90638 The drive-through vehicular queues were observed and documented in 15-minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 1:00 PM on a typical weekday and typical Saturday. Appendix I includes the drive-through lane queueing survey data. Table 13 summarizes the surveyed drive-through lane queue length collected at the three Starbucks coffee shop locations. The surveyed drive-through lane queue rates are estimated based on the average queue length divided by the approximate building area of each survey site. As shown in Table 13, the drive-through lane queue rates are calculated to be as follows:  Peak drive-through lane queue rates: □ 7.59 vehicles per TSF for weekdays; and, □ 10.00 vehicles per TSF for Saturdays.  85th drive-through lane queue rates: □ 6.56 vehicles per TSF for weekdays; and, □ 7.78 vehicles per TSF for Saturdays.  Average drive-through lane queue rates: □ 4.84 vehicles per TSF for weekdays; and, □ 5.64 vehicles per TSF for Saturdays. As shown in Table 14, the projected peak weekday and Saturday drive-through lane queue lengths for the proposed project are 14 and 18 vehicles, respectively, which is a queue length deficit of nine (9) vehicles with a proposed storage capacity of 9 vehicles. The projected 85th percentile weekday and Saturday drive-through lane queue lengths for the proposed project are 12 and 14 vehicles, respectively, which is a queue length 53 PC AGENDA PAGE 108 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 54 19274 deficit of five (5) vehicles. The projected average weekday and Saturday drive-through lane queue lengths for the proposed project are 9 and 10 vehicles, respectively, which is a queue length deficit of one (1) vehicle. It is also noted that due to current public health orders, indoor dining is prohibited, which has greatly increased the typical peak drive-through lane queue lengths during the recent survey. If necessary, this potential overflow could be accommodated on-site within the parking lot drive aisles internal to the project site. Therefore, drive through queueing is not anticipated to spill-over on the street. An option that the City is considering to limit vehicular access to the site off Firestone Boulevard only, with exiting only off Lakewood Boulevard on a permanent basis. Restricting the driveway on Lakewood Boulevard to exit-only will require all the inbound traffic to enter the project site at the driveway on Firestone Boulevard, and the access restriction will increase the right turn traffic on Firestone Stone into the project site. It is possible that the increased inbound traffic movement on Firestone Boulevard may potentially cause traffic to spill onto Firestone Boulevard during peak conditions without a second egress. It is recommended that both ingress and egress are provided at the both driveways on Firestone Boulevard and Lakewood Boulevard. 54 PC AGENDA PAGE 109 Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 8 2 7 3 7 3 7 3 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 6 2 9 4 3 4 6 3 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 7 6 9 5 6 3 7 5 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 12 9 5 1 11 3 9 4 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 14 6 13 2 9 4 12 4 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 12 6 14 7 8 8 11 7 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 14 8 12 12 9 7 12 9 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 11 12 11 11 12 6 11 10 9:00 AM - 9:15 AM 12 5 9 15 6 8 9 9 9:15 AM - 9:30 AM 7 13 4 10 7 10 6 11 9:30 AM - 9:45 AM 5 23 8 12 7 13 7 16 9:45 AM - 10:00 AM 10 23 13 11 6 13 10 16 10:00 AM - 10:15 AM 9 12 13 15 5 15 9 14 10:15 AM - 10:30 AM 8 12 8 15 13 14 10 14 10:30 AM - 10:45 AM 3 13 12 11 7 14 7 13 10:45 AM - 11:00 AM 7 13 9 12 8 15 8 13 11:00 AM - 11:15 AM 8 13 8 15 9 12 8 13 11:15 AM - 11:30 AM 8 14 12 16 11 12 10 14 11:30 AM - 11:45 AM 9 13 7 9 6 11 7 11 11:45 AM - 12:00 PM 10 13 7 6 2 13 6 11 12:00 PM - 12:15 PM 9 12 10 7 4 12 8 10 12:15 PM - 12:30 PM 11 10 7 12 12 14 10 12 12:30 PM - 12:45 PM 10 9 9 11 8 12 9 11 12:45 PM - 1:00 PM 9 11 9 10 10 7 9 9 1:00 PM - 1:15 PM 4 11 9 14 10 11 8 12 14 23 14 16 13 15 12 16 12.0 13.0 12.4 15.0 11.0 14.0 10.4 14.0 8.9 10.8 9.4 9.8 7.8 9.8 8.6 10.2 9/30/20 9/26/20 9/30/20 9/26/20 9/30/20 9/26/20 Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday 7.78 12.78 7.78 8.89 7.22 8.33 7.59 10.00 6.67 7.22 6.89 8.33 6.11 7.78 6.56 7.78 4.96 6.02 5.20 5.47 4.36 5.42 4.84 5.64 Average Maximum 85th Percentile Table 13 Survey Site Drive-Through Queue Volume Summary 1 - Downey, CA 3 - La Mirada, CA Average Time Period Number of Queue Vehicles in Drive Through Lane 2 - Whittier, CA Survey Date 9/26-30/2020 Building Area (SF1)1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 Note: (1) SF = Square Feet Observed Queue Rate (Vehicle per 1,000 SF) 1 - Downey, CA 2 - Whittier, CA 3 - La Mirada, CA Average Peak Queue Rate 85th Percentile Queue Rate Average Queue Rate Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927455PC AGENDA PAGE 110 Proposed Use Component Quantity 1 Units2 Queue Spaces Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 7.59 Queue : 1,000 SF 14 Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 10.00 Queue : 1,000 SF 18 Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 6.56 Queue : 1,000 SF 12 Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 7.78 Queue : 1,000 SF 14 Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 4.84 Queue : 1,000 SF 9 Coffee Shop with Drive-Through Window Gross Floor Area + Outdoor Seating 1,798 SF 5.64 Queue : 1,000 SF 10 9 -9 -5 -1 (1) (2) (3) Table 14 Project Drive-Through Queue Length Based on Observed Survey Site Queue Rates Observed Survey Site Queue Rate Observed Queue Rates Observed Weekday 85th Percentile3 Gross floor area is 1,698 square feet and the outdoor seating area is approximately 100 square feet for a total of 1,798 square feet. SF = Square Feet Observed average weekday and Saturday queue rates at 3 similar survey sites in Downey, Whittier and La Mirada based on count data collected during September 26 to September 30, 2020 (see Table 12). Observed Weekday Peak3 Observed Saturday Peak3 Queue Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) for the Proposed Project Comparing to Peak Queue Rates Observed Weekday Average3 Observed Saturday Average3 Available Drive-Through Queue Length [See Figure 2] Queue Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) for the Proposed Project Comparing to 85th Percentile Queue Rates Queue Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) for the Proposed Project Comparing to Average Queue Rates Notes: Observed Saturday 85th Percentile3 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927456PC AGENDA PAGE 111 Figure 28 Average Drive-Through Weekday and Saturday Queue Lengths 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 7:00 AM 7:30 AM 8:00 AM 8:30 AM 9:00 AM 9:30 AM 10:00 AM 10:30 AM 11:00 AM 11:30 AM 12:00 PM 12:30 PM 1:00 PM Average Weekday Average Saturday Provided Capacity Legend Nu m b e r o f Q u e u e V e h i c l e s i n D r i v e T h r o u g h L a n e Time of Day Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927457PC AGENDA PAGE 112 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 58 19274 9. COLLISION HISTORY DATA REVIEW City of Downey has provided 3-year collision history data near the intersection of Lakewood Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard for Year 2016 to Year 2018. Appendix J includes the 3-year collision data sheets. Table 15 summarizes the collision data in terms of collision type, severity and the travel direction of the party at fault for the collision. There were a total of 38 reported collisions in the three year period, including zero fatalities and 25 injury collisions with 36 injured persons. Year 2016 appears to have a very high collision rate with 27 collisions which is approximately 71% of the 3-year total. Year 2017 has lower collision rate with nine (9) collisions which is approximately 24% of the 3-year total. Year 2018 has a very low collision with only two (2) collisions which is 5% of the 3-year total. An obvious trend is that the collision has decreased dramatically from Year 2016 to Year 2018. Another trend is that the number of broadside collisions, which are usually caused by right-of-way violations and typically result in more severe injuries, has decreased so that there are also less injury collisions. Based on review of historical imagery, it appears that turning path striping was added in early 2017 to the dual left turn lane movements on Firestone Boulevard and may be the reason for the reduction. The collision data shows a total of eight broadside crashes within a twelve-month period involving northbound left turn and southbound through vehicles between February 6, 2016 and February 4, 2017. Per Section 4C.08.B of the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), a change in traffic signal operation, such as conversion to full-protected left-turn phasing, should be considered if five or more reported crashes for types (i.e. left turning crashes) that may be susceptible to correction by said operation change have occurred within a twelve-month period. It should be noted that the City has a Capital Improvement Project currently in process which will construct northbound and southbound double left turn lanes on Lakewood Boulevard at Firestone Boulevard as well as converting the signal operation of the northbound and southbound left turn approaches from protected-permissive to fully-protected left-turn phasing. This protected left-turn phasing improvement is expected to improve traffic capacity at the intersection and to mitigate the frequency of the broadside collision involving the northbound and southbound left turning movements on Lakewood Boulevard. 58 PC AGENDA PAGE 113 Broadside Rear-End Sidewipe Head-On Object Bike Ped Other DUI Fatal Injury NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 1 01/04/16 1 0 1 1 2 01/10/16 1 0 1 1 3 02/06/16 1 0 4 1 4 03/24/16 1 0 0 1 5 03/28/16 1 0 0 1 6 04/02/16 1 1 0 0 1 7 04/05/16 1 0 2 1 8 05/06/16 1 1 0 0 1 9 05/14/16 1 0 1 1 10 05/25/16 1 0 1 1 11 06/21/16 1 1 0 1 1 12 07/15/16 1 1 0 0 1 13 07/22/16 1 0 1 1 14 08/01/16 1 0 2 1 15 08/10/16 1 0 2 1 16 08/19/16 1 0 2 1 17 08/31/16 1 0 2 1 18 09/15/16 1 0 2 1 19 09/17/16 1 0 1 1 20 09/18/16 1 1 0 1 1 21 09/21/16 1 0 0 1 22 10/02/16 1 0 1 1 23 10/09/16 1 1 0 0 1 24 11/13/16 1 0 1 1 25 11/19/16 1 0 1 1 26 12/13/16 1 0 0 1 27 12/13/16 1 0 1 1 28 01/05/17 1 0 0 1 29 01/20/17 1 0 1 1 30 02/04/17 1 1 0 0 1 31 03/09/17 1 0 1 1 32 03/18/17 1 0 1 1 33 03/22/17 1 0 1 1 34 04/20/17 1 0 3 1 35 06/10/17 1 0 1 1 36 06/19/17 1 0 0 1 37 12/23/18 1 1 0 0 1 38 12/29/18 1 0 0 1 13 10 7 2 3 1 1 1 9 2 0 3 2 3 1 3 0 2 10 3 11 6 4 2 2 1 0 1 6 2 0 3 2 1 1 1 0 2 7 2 2 3 3 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Notes: (1) Object = Hit Object; DUI = Driving Under Influence (2) N = Northbound; S = Southbound; E = Eastbound; W = Westbound; L = Left; T = Through; R = Right 2018 Total 12 20 0 2016 Total 627 27 2017 Total 19 9 0 28 0 8 383-Year Total 8 380 36 Table 15 Three-Year (2016-2018) Collision Data Summary Travel Direction2 DateNo.SeverityCollision Type1 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1927459PC AGENDA PAGE 114 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 60 19274 10. VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) ASSESSMENT BACKGROUND California Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) directs the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to amend the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines for evaluating transportation impacts to provide alternatives to Level of Service that “promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses.” In December 2018, the California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted the updated CEQA Guidelines package. The amended CEQA Guidelines, specifically Section 15064.3, recommend the use of Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) as the primary metric for the evaluation of transportation impacts associated with land use and transportation projects. In general terms, VMT quantifies the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project or region. All agencies and projects State-wide are required to utilize the updated CEQA guidelines recommending use of VMT for evaluating transportation impacts as of July 1, 2020. The updated CEQA Guidelines allow for lead agency discretion in establishing methodologies and thresholds provided there is substantial evidence to demonstrate that the established procedures promote the intended goals of the legislation. Where quantitative models or methods are unavailable, Section 15064.3 allows agencies to assess VMT qualitatively using factors such as availability of transit and proximity to other destinations. The Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (State of California, December 2018) [“OPR Technical Advisory”] provides technical considerations regarding methodologies and thresholds with a focus on office, residential, and retail developments as these projects tend to have the greatest influence on VMT. VMT ASSESSMENT AND SCREENING The project VMT impact has been assessed in accordance with guidance from the Los Angeles County Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (July 23, 2020) [“Los Angeles County TIA Guidelines”]. The transportation guidelines provide a framework for “screening criteria” for when a project is expected to cause a less than significant impact without conducting a detailed VMT study. In Section 3.1.2.2. – Retail Project Site Plan Screening Criteria A project that contains a local serving retail use is assumed to have less than significant VMT impacts for the retail portion of the project. If the answer to the following question is no, a less than significant determination can be made for the portion of the project that contains retail uses.  Does the project contain retail uses that exceed 50,000 square feet of gross floor area? The proposed project is considered a local-serving coffee shop that caters to customers located nearby or are already part of the through traffic along Lakewood Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard. The proposed coffee shop consists of less than 50,000 square feet of gross floor area. Therefore, the proposed project is presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT since it satisfies one or more of the VMT screening criteria established by the County of Los Angeles. No additional VMT modeling or mitigation measures are required. Although the proposed project is forecast to generate more gross trips than the larger non-drive through restaurant it is replacing, the proposed drive through restaurant attracts more pass-by trips (i.e., trips that are already on the road). As previously noted in the project trip generation (see Table 3), the proposed project is forecast to generate fewer net new daily trips than the existing restaurant to be displaced after accounting for pass-by trip credits. 60 PC AGENDA PAGE 115 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 61 19274 11. CONCLUSIONS SITE ACCESS This analysis assumes the following improvements will be constructed by the project to provide project site access: Project Driveway at Lakewood Boulevard  Install a westbound cross street stop-control.  Construct the westbound approach to consist of one right-turn lane. Project Driveway at Firestone Boulevard  Install a northbound cross street stop-control.  Construct the northbound approach to consist of one right-turn lane. LEVEL OF SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS The proposed project is forecast to result in no Level of Service impacts at the study intersections for any of the evaluated analysis scenarios based on the City-established standards since with project conditions do not exceed the allowable increase in volume-to-capacity ratio. Therefore, no off-site improvements are recommended for the intersection of Lakewood Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS Figure 29 summarizes the circulation recommendations for the proposed project. All roadway design, traffic signing and striping, and traffic control improvements relating to the proposed project should be constructed in accordance with applicable engineering standards and to the satisfaction of the City of Downey Public Works Department. Site-adjacent roadways should be constructed or repaired at their ultimate half-section width, including landscaping and parkway improvements in conjunction with development, or as otherwise required by the City of Downey Public Works Department. On-site traffic signing and striping plans should be submitted for City of Downey approval in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. The final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans should demonstrate that sight distance standards are met in accordance with applicable City of Downey/California Department of Transportation sight distance standards. As is the case for any roadway design, the City of Downey should periodically review traffic operations in the vicinity of the project once the project is constructed to assure that the traffic operations are satisfactory. PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer (ITE) parking rates, the 85th percentile weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 23 and 21 parking spaces, respectively, which exceeds the proposed parking supply of 18 parking spaces by five (5) parking spaces. It is anticipated that the 85th percentile parking demand will only occur occasionally for a short period of time during the AM and PM peak periods. The average weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 9 and 16 parking 61 PC AGENDA PAGE 116 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 62 19274 spaces, respectively. Since the proposed parking supply is 18 parking spaces, the project is anticipated to provide adequate parking supply to accommodate the typical average parking demand, though there may be short periods of time during the AM and PM peak hours where parking capacity is reached. Based on new survey data at three similar coffee shop locations and observed parking rates, the projected peak weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 16 and 14 parking spaces, respectively, which is a parking surplus of two (2) parking spaces with a proposed parking supply of 18 parking spaces. The projected 85th percentile weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 12 and 12 parking spaces, respectively, which is a parking surplus of six (6) parking spaces. The projected average weekday and Saturday parking demand for the proposed project are 9 and 9 parking spaces, respectively, which is a parking surplus of nine (9) parking spaces. Since the proposed parking supply is 18 parking spaces, the project is anticipated to provide adequate parking supply to accommodate the projected parking demand based on the survey site data. It should be noted that due to current public health orders during COVID-19 pandemic, indoor dining is prohibited, which has greatly reduced the typical peak parking demand. Once these health orders are lifted at the pandemic, the parking demand will likely normalize to be more similar to the ITE parking rates. PARKING TURNOVER ANALYSIS Based on new survey data at three similar coffee shop locations, the time duration for each parked vehicles are recorded in terms of number of 15-minute interval parked at each stall. The average turnover are estimated based on the total time duration for all vehicles divided by the total number of parked vehicles at each survey site. The parking turnover rates are between 41.9 minutes to 61.6 minutes based on total number of parked vehicles including employees that will park their vehicles for a much longer duration than typical customers. Therefore, it would be more realistic to estimate the turnover rate for the proposed coffee shop based on customer data and exclude the employee data. For the customer parking turnover rates, it is assumed that the customers will have parking duration of 2 hours or less, which consists of approximately 82% to 93% of the total parked vehicles during the survey. The average customer parking turnover rates are 26.4 minutes during weekdays and 24.5 minutes during Saturdays. It should be noted that the turnover survey was conducted in number of 15-minute interval so the minimal turnover rate is 15 minutes which is a very conservative assumption, and it is likely that the actual turnover rates should be lower than the calculated average values. DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUE ANALYSIS Based on new survey data at three similar coffee shop locations, the surveyed drive-through lane queue rates are estimated based on the average queue length divided by the approximate building area of each survey site. The projected peak weekday and Saturday drive-through lane queue lengths for the proposed project are 14 and 18 vehicles, respectively, which is a queue length deficit of nine (9) vehicles with a proposed storage capacity of 9 vehicles. The projected 85th percentile weekday and Saturday drive-through lane queue lengths for the proposed project are 12 and 14 vehicles, respectively, which is a queue length deficit of five (5) vehicles. The projected average weekday and Saturday drive-through lane queue lengths for the proposed project are 9 and 10 vehicles, respectively, which is a queue length deficit of one (1) vehicle. It is also noted that due to current public health orders, indoor dining is prohibited, which has greatly increased the typical peak drive-through lane queue lengths during the recent survey. If necessary, this potential overflow could be accommodated on-site within the parking lot drive aisles internal to the project site. Therefore, drive through queueing is not anticipated to spill-over on the street. An option that the City is considering to limit vehicular access to the site off Firestone Boulevard only, with exiting only off Lakewood Boulevard on a permanent basis. Restricting the driveway on Lakewood Boulevard to exit-only will require all the inbound traffic to enter the project site at the driveway on Firestone Boulevard, 62 PC AGENDA PAGE 117 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 63 19274 and the access restriction will increase the right turn traffic on Firestone Stone into the project site. It is possible that the increased inbound traffic movement on Firestone Boulevard may potentially cause traffic to spill onto Firestone Boulevard during peak conditions without a second egress. It is recommended that both ingress and egress are provided at the both driveways on Firestone Boulevard and Lakewood Boulevard. COLLISION HISTORY REVIEW Based on a review of collision history data near the intersection of Lakewood Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard for the three-year period from 2016 to 2018, there are a total of 38 reported collisions, including zero fatalities and 25 injury collisions with 36 injured persons. Year 2016 appears to have a very high collision rate with 27 collisions which is approximately 71% of the 3-year total. Year 2017 has lower collision rate with 9 collisions which is approximately 24% of the 3-year total. Year 2018 has a very low collision with only 2 collisions which is 5% of the 3-year. Another trend is that the number of broadside collisions, which are usually caused by right-of-way violations and typically result in more severe injuries, has decreased so that there are also less injury collisions. Based on review of historical imagery, it appears that turning path striping was added in early 2017 to the dual left turn lane movements on Firestone Boulevard and may be the reason for the reduction. The collision data shows a total of eight broadside crashes within a twelve-month period involving northbound left turn and southbound through vehicles between February 6, 2016 and February 4, 2017. Per Section 4C.08.B of the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), a change in traffic signal operation, such as conversion to full-protected left-turn phasing, should be considered if five or more reported crashes for types (i.e. left turning crashes) that may be susceptible to correction by said operation change have occurred within a twelve-month period. It should be noted that the City has a Capital Improvement Project currently in process which will construct northbound and southbound double left turn lanes on Lakewood Boulevard at Firestone Boulevard as well as converting the signal operation of the northbound and southbound left turn approaches from protected-permissive to fully-protected left-turn phasing. This protected left-turn phasing improvement is expected to improve traffic capacity at the intersection and to mitigate the frequency of the broadside collision involving the northbound and southbound left turning movements on Lakewood Boulevard. VMT ASSESSMENT The proposed project is considered a local-serving coffee shop that caters to customers located nearby or are already part of the through traffic along Lakewood Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard. Therefore, the proposed project is presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT since it satisfies one or more of the VMT screening criteria established by the County of Los Angeles. No additional VMT modeling or mitigation measures are required. 63 PC AGENDA PAGE 118 Figure 29 Circulation Recommendations Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 All roadway design, traffic signing and striping, and traffic control improvements relating to the proposed project should be constructed in accordance with applicable engineering standards and to the satisfaction of the City of Downey Public Works Department. Site-adjacent roadways should be constructed or repaired at their ultimate half-section width, including landscaping and parkway improvements in conjunction with development, or as otherwise required by the City of Downey Public Works Department. On-site traffic signing and striping plans should be submitted for City of Downey approval in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. The final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans should demonstrate that sight distance standards are met in accordance with applicable City of Downey/California Department of Transportation sight distance standards. As is the case for any roadway design, the City of Downey should periodically review traffic operations in the vicinity of the project once the project is constructed to assure that the traffic operations are satisfactory. N Stop Sign Right Turns In/Out Only Access Driveway Legend STOP ST O P STOP 64 PC AGENDA PAGE 119 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 APPENDICES Appendix A Glossary Appendix B Scoping Agreement Appendix C Volume Count Data sheets Appendix D Level of Service Worksheets Appendix E Other Cumulative Development Location Map Appendix F ITE Parking Generation, City of Downey Municipal Code and Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan Appendix G Parking Occupancy Survey Count Data Sheets Appendix H Parking Turnover Survey Count Data Sheets Appendix I Drive-Through Lane Queueing Survey Count Data Sheets Appendix J Collision History Data Sheets Apx - 1 PC AGENDA PAGE 120 APPENDIX A GLOSSARY Apx - 2 PC AGENDA PAGE 121 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ACRONYMS AC Acres ADT Average Daily Traffic Caltrans California Department of Transportation DU Dwelling Unit ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS Level of Service TSF Thousand Square Feet V/C Volume/Capacity VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled TERMS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The average 24-hour volume for a stated period divided by the number of days in that period. For example, Annual Average Daily Traffic is the total volume during a year divided by 365 days. BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a signal progression. BOTTLENECK: A point of constriction along a roadway that limits the amount of traffic that can proceed downstream from its location. CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway in a given time period. CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into definite paths of travel by the use of pavement markings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facilitate the safe and orderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow time. If there is an all red interval after the end of a yellow, then that is also added into the clearance interval. CONTROL DELAY: The component of delay, typically expressed in seconds per vehicle, resulting from the type of traffic control at an intersection. Control delay is measured by comparison with the uncontrolled condition; it includes delay incurred by slowing down, stopping/waiting, and speeding up. CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other items are counted (in and out). CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE: The minimum sight distance required by the driver of a vehicle to cross or enter the lanes of the major roadway without requiring approaching traffic travelling at a given speed to radically alter their speed or trajectory. Corner sight distance is measured from the driver’s eye at 42 inches above the pavement to an object height of 36 inches above the pavement in the center of the nearest approach lane. CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for a traffic signal to complete one full cycle of indications. CUL-DE-SAC: A local street open at one end only and with special provisions for turning around. Apx - 3 PC AGENDA PAGE 122 DAILY CAPACITY: A theoretical value representing the daily traffic volume that will typically result in a peak hour volume equal to the capacity of the roadway. DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by some element over which it has no control, usually expressed in seconds per vehicle. DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic-actuated signal. DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic lanes of a roadway at any given instant. Usually expressed in vehicles per mile. DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse to the signal controller. DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of a highway, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance (upon which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent) are correlated to design speed. DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak direction at any point in time. DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion. FORCED FLOW: Opposite of free flow. FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and travel is unimpeded by other traffic. GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to front bumper. HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, front bumper to front bumper. INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that are connected to achieve signal progression. LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs. LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedded in the roadway, energized by alternating current and producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle. MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: Smallest time headway between successive vehicles in a traffic stream into which another vehicle is willing and able to cross or merge. MULTI-MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit, rail rapid transit, and bicycle transportation modes. OFFSET: The time interval in seconds between the beginning of green at one intersection and the beginning of green at an adjacent intersection. PLATOON: A closely grouped component of traffic that is composed of several vehicles moving, or standing ready to move, with clear spaces ahead and behind. Apx - 4 PC AGENDA PAGE 123 PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENT (PCE): A metric used to assess the impact of larger vehicles, such as trucks, recreational vehicles, and buses, by converting the traffic volume of larger vehicles to an equivalent number of passenger cars. PEAK HOUR: The 60 consecutive minutes with the highest number of vehicles. PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go on a predetermined time schedule without regard to traffic conditions. Also, fixed time signal. PROGRESSION: A term used to describe the progressive movement of traffic through several signalized intersections. QUEUE: The number of vehicles waiting at a service area such as a traffic signal, stop sign, or access gate. QUEUE LENGTH: The length of vehicle queue, typically expressed in feet, waiting at a service area such as a traffic signal, stop sign, or access gate. SCREEN-LINE: An imaginary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted, normally to verify the validity of mathematical traffic models. SHARED/RECIPROCAL PARKING AGREEMENT: A written binding document executed between property owners to provide a designated number of off-street parking stalls within a designated area to be available for specified businesses or land uses. SIGHT DISTANCE: The continuous length of roadway visible to a driver or roadway user. SIGNAL CYCLE: The time period in seconds required for one complete sequence of signal indications. SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more traffic movements. STACKING DISTANCE: The length of area available behind a service area, such as a traffic signal or gate, for vehicle queueing to occur. STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiating the movement of queued traffic from a stop to an average running speed through an intersection. STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE: The minimum distance required by the driver of a vehicle on the major roadway travelling at a given speed to bring the vehicle to a stop after an object on the road becomes visible. Stopping sight distance is measured from the driver’s eye at 42 inches above the pavement to an object height of 6 inches above the pavement. TRAFFIC-ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go in accordance with the demands of traffic, as registered by the actuation of detectors. TRIP: The movement of a person or vehicle from one location (origin) to another (destination). For example, from home to store to home is two trips, not one. TRIP-END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination (i.e., each trip has two trip-ends). A trip-end occurs when a person, object, or message is transferred to or from a vehicle. TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quantity of trips produced and/or attracted by a specific land use stated in terms of units such as per dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square feet of floor space. TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having more than two axles. Apx - 5 PC AGENDA PAGE 124 TURNING RADIUS: The circular arc formed by the smallest turning path radius of the front outside tire of a vehicle, such as that performed by a U-turn maneuver. This is based on the length and width of the wheel base as well as the steering mechanism of the vehicle. UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the other. On a daily basis, most facilities have balanced flow. During the peak hours, flow is seldom balanced in an urban area. VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a section of highway, obtained by multiplying the average daily traffic by length of facility in miles. Apx - 6 PC AGENDA PAGE 125 APPENDIX B SCOPING AGREEMENT Apx - 7 PC AGENDA PAGE 126 SCOPING AGREEMENT FOR CITY OF INDIO TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS This Memorandum of Understanding acknowledges the City of Downey Traffic Impact Analysis requirements for the following project. The Traffic Impact Analysis will be completed in accordance with Los Angeles County TIA guidelines. Project Name: Starbucks (9002 Firestone Boulevard) Project Project Address/Location: 9002 Firestone Boulevard Governmental Jurisdiction: City of Downey Project Description and Land Use: 1,698 square foot coffee shop with drive-through window (See Figure2) Consultant Developer Name: Tom Huang Firm: GANDDINI GROUP, INC. Megdal Downey LLC. Address: 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 252 South Beverly Drive, Suite C Santa Ana, CA 92705 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Telephone: 714-795-3100 x 102 E-mail: tom@ganddini.com Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017 (see Table 1) Morning Evening In Out In Out Daily Existing 22 14 20 20 499 Proposed 23 22 11 11 418 Total +1 +8 -9 -9 -81 Project Full Occupancy Year: 2022 Internal Trip Capture Allowance No ( - Trip Discount) Pass-By Trip Allowance Yes ( 70% Trip Discount) Analysis Conditions: 1. Existing (2020) 2. Existing Plus Project 3. Opening Year (2022) Without Project 4. Opening Year (2022) With Project Study Intersections: (See Figure 1) 1. Lakewood Boulevard @ Firestone Boulevard 2. Lakewood Boulevard @ Project Driveway 3. Project Driveway @ Firestone Boulevard 2020 Base Volumes: (See Appendix A) Due to the lockdown, current 2020 traffic counts could not be conducted in the near future because the traffic patterns may not be normalized for an extended period of time. Therefore, it is recommended that the 2020 traffic volumes at the intersection of Lakewood Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard be estimated using available historic 2016 traffic data with an ambient growth rate. As shown in Table 2, the annual ambient growth rate of 1.0% is estimated based on the Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (CMP) General Traffic Volume Growth Factors for 2015 and 2020 for the Regional Statistical Area of Downey (RSA9). The 2020 background traffic will be estimated as follows: Apx - 8 PC AGENDA PAGE 127 1. Lakewood Boulevard @ Firestone Boulevard – 2015 intersection peak hour counts with 1.0 % annual growth over 5 years (total growth factor = 1.052) A. Lakewood Boulevards, south of Firestone Boulevard – 2016 segment 24-hour counts with 1.0% annual growth over 4 years (total growth factor = 1.041) B. Firestone Boulevards, west of Lakewood Boulevard – 2016 segment 24-hour counts with 1.0% annual growth over 4 years (total growth factor = 1.041) C. Firestone Boulevards, west of Woodruff Avenue – 2015 segment 24-hour counts with 1.0% annual growth over 5 years (total growth factor = 1.052) Historic 2015 and 2016 traffic counts are included in Appendix A. The Opening Year 2022 will included an additional 1.0% annual growth for 2 years (total growth factor = 1.020). Trip Distribution: (See Figures 3 and 4) The inbound and outbound turning movement volumes for the two project driveways will be estimated based on trip generation calculations for the proposed land uses shown in Table 1 and the project trip distribution patterns shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. Parking Analysis: The average and peak parking demand for the proposed coffee shop project will be estimated based on the parking data in the ITE Parking Generation Manual (5th Edition, 2019) because it more stringent than the City of Downey Municipal Parking Code but more reasonable than the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan. The typical City of Downey Municipal Parking Code for an eating and drinking establishment with drive-through window is 1 parking space per 100 square feet of gross floor area (or 10 spaces per 1,000 square feet). Since the project site is located within the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan, the parking requirement is one parking space per 50 square feet (or 20 spaces per 1,000 square feet) of floor area including the outdoor seating area, which is twice as much as the City Municipal Code. For a coffee shop with drive-through window (ITE code 937), the ITE weekday average parking rate is 5.22 vehicles per 1,000 square feet (TSF) and the ITE weekday 85th percentile parking rate is 12.52 vehicles per TSF. For weekends, the ITE Saturday average parking rate is 8.70 vehicles per TSF and the ITE Saturday peak parking rate is 11.85 vehicles per TSF. Appendix B contains the ITE parking generation rates, the City Municipal Code Parking Ordinance and the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan. Drive-Through Queueing Analysis: The average and peak hour drive-through lane queueing lengths will be estimated based on available historical 2012 survey data at 3 coffee shop locations. Appendix C contains the historic 2012 drive-through lane queueing survey data. In the City Municipal Code, the minimum number of stacking spaces for a coffee shop is four spaces before the order board and 4 spaces between order board and the pick-up window. Items to be provided by the City of Downey  Please provide us with a three-year crash history at the intersection of Lakewood Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard  Please provide us with a list of other approved cumulative developments in the City to be incorporated into the future traffic forecast. Prepared by: Approved by: 08.20.2020 Consultant’s Representative Date City of Downey Representative Date 19274 Apx - 9 PC AGENDA PAGE 128 No.Land Use Code¹ Units² In % Out % Total In % Out % Total 1 Fast-Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window ITE 933 TSF 60% 40% 25.10 50% 50% 28.34 346.23 2 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window ITE 937 TSF 51% 49% 88.99 50% 50% 43.38 820.38 No.Land Use In Out Total In Out Total Existing Land Use3 1 Fast-Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window 2.400 TSF 36 24 60 34 34 68 831 Pass-By Trips4 40%4 -14 -10 -24 -14 -14 -28 -332 22 14 36 20 20 40 499 Proposed Project 2 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window 1.698 TSF 77 74 151 37 37 74 1,393 Pass-By Trips4 70%4 -54 -52 -106 -26 -26 -52 -975 23 22 45 11 11 22 418 +1 +8 +9 -9 -9 -18 -81 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) A more conservative (lower) pass-by trip reduction percentage is utilized in the trip generation calculations. Table E.31, Land Use Code 934 - Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window, Average Pass-By Trip Percentage = 49%. Table E.34, Land Use Code 938 - Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window, Average Pass-By Trip Percentage = 89%. Table 1 Project Trip Generation Trip Generation Rates Project Off-Site Net Trips Trips Generated Quantity² Total Existing Trips Total Proposed Trips Notes: ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual , 10th Edition, 2017; XXX = Land Use Code TSF = Thousand Square Feet Existing trip credit for existing building estimated based on approximate building size. Pass-By Trips: ITE, Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, 2017. Project AM Peak PM Peak Daily Project AM Peak PM Peak Daily Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274Apx - 10 PC AGENDA PAGE 129 Year Growth Factor1 Year Growth Factor1 Years of Growth Growth Factor Growth Factor Growth Rate 22 Downey 2015 1.052 2020 1.104 5 1.052 1.010 1.0% (1)Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (CMP) General Traffic Volume Growth Factors (Exhibit D-1) Regional Statistical Area (RSA) Notes: Overall Growth Annual Growth Table 2 Annual Growth Rate Calculation Year 1 Year 2 Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274Apx - 11 PC AGENDA PAGE 130 Figure 1 Project Location Map Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 1 2 3 Study Intersection Legend # Apx - 12 PC AGENDA PAGE 131 Figure 2 Site Plan Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Apx - 13 PC AGENDA PAGE 132 Figure 3 Project Outbound Trip Distribution Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 50% 50% 50% 5% 45% Percent From Project Legend 10% Apx - 14 PC AGENDA PAGE 133 Figure 4 Project Inbound Trip Distribution Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 N Site FIRESTONE BLVD L A K E W O O D B L V D 50% 50% 50% 25% 25% Percent To Project Legend 10% Apx - 15 PC AGENDA PAGE 134 APPENDIX C VOLUME COUNT DATA SHEETS Apx - 16 PC AGENDA PAGE 135 ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 131 City: AM 281 794 146 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 273 1146 320 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 265 0 226 1 856 0 803 3 2 248 0 233 191 0 184 2 3 1007 0 1061 1 112 0 219 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 82 1140 317 AM NOON 000NOON PM 192 1013 247 PM 131Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 1219 0 1268 1312 0 1213 1367 0 1513 1470 0 1628 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 30011452 1221 1549 1097 0 South Leg 27812586 0 East Leg North Leg 3211 2782 2636 0 South Leg East Leg 1539 00 14721739 West Leg 0 West Leg 2841 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 1097 0 1549 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 2874 0 6:00 PM 1653 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-5358-001 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Lakewood Blvd and Firestone Blvd , Downey PM Peak Hour 1628 1653 0 1472 Signalized CONTROL 430 PM 1219 0 1268 La k e w o o d B l v d AM Peak Hour Tuesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Downey Date: 1470 0 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:6/2/2015 Firestone Blvd Apx - 17 PC AGENDA PAGE 136 ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 131 City: AM 293 823 164 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 260 1199 271 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 253 0 235 1 884 0 922 3 2 244 0 244 156 0 190 2 3 954 0 1036 1 129 0 211 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 95 1176 326 AM NOON 000NOON PM 182 1049 227 PM 131Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 1272 0 1364 1293 0 1347 1327 0 1491 1444 0 1534 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 30581458 1280 1600 1108 0 South Leg 28552599 0 East Leg North Leg 3258 2737 2705 0 South Leg East Leg 1597 00 15281730 West Leg 0 West Leg 2881 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 1108 0 1600 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 2953 0 6:00 PM 1673 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-5358-001 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Lakewood Blvd and Firestone Blvd , Downey PM Peak Hour 1534 1673 0 1528 Signalized CONTROL 445 PM 1272 0 1364 La k e w o o d B l v d AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Downey Date: 1444 0 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:6/3/2015 Firestone Blvd Apx - 18 PC AGENDA PAGE 137 AM 287 809 155 PM 267 1173 296 AM PM AM PM 246 239 259 231 981 1049 870 863 121 215 174 187 AM 89 1158 322 PM 187 1031 237 Northbound Approach Lakewood Blvd and Firestone Blvd , Downey AVERAGED E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h W e s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Southbound Approach Apx - 19 PC AGENDA PAGE 138 Prepared by NDS/ATD Day:City:Downey Date:Project #:CA16_5079_002 NB SB EB WB 00 20,266 18,387 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 0 0 45 34 79 0 0 374 271 645 00:15 0 0 40 39 79 0 0 375 305 680 00:30 0 0 34 32 66 0 0 345 370 715 00:45 0 0 29 148 26 131 55 279 0 0 388 1482 331 1277 719 2759 01:00 0 0 21 27 48 0 0 395 342 737 01:15 0 0 20 19 39 0 0 265 348 613 01:30 0 0 46 28 74 0 0 289 322 611 01:45 0 0 21 108 15 89 36 197 0 0 296 1245 282 1294 578 2539 02:00 0 0 23 9 32 0 0 332 265 597 02:15 0 0 16 16 32 0 0 314 322 636 02:30 0 0 15 18 33 0 0 351 375 726 02:45 0 0 11 65 16 59 27 124 0 0 357 1354 367 1329 724 2683 03:00 0 0 18 15 33 0 0 361 342 703 03:15 0 0 15 14 29 0 0 363 343 706 03:30 0 0 18 23 41 0 0 395 315 710 03:45 0 0 37 88 24 76 61 164 0 0 417 1536 339 1339 756 2875 04:00 0 0 21 22 43 0 0 383 303 686 04:15 0 0 30 24 54 0 0 345 298 643 04:30 0 0 52 48 100 0 0 419 313 732 04:45 0 0 43 146 55 149 98 295 0 0 415 1562 351 1265 766 2827 05:00 0 0 48 61 109 0 0 350 288 638 05:15 0 0 61 75 136 0 0 369 345 714 05:30 0 0 104 72 176 0 0 305 336 641 05:45 0 0 91 304 111 319 202 623 0 0 365 1389 318 1287 683 2676 06:00 0 0 120 101 221 0 0 320 373 693 06:15 0 0 156 113 269 0 0 304 320 624 06:30 0 0 218 165 383 0 0 255 300 555 06:45 0 0 229 723 208 587 437 1310 0 0 297 1176 278 1271 575 2447 07:00 0 0 303 228 531 0 0 246 298 544 07:15 0 0 375 270 645 0 0 261 244 505 07:30 0 0 475 366 841 0 0 224 278 502 07:45 0 0 304 1457 361 1225 665 2682 0 0 235 966 275 1095 510 2061 08:00 0 0 290 281 571 0 0 185 216 401 08:15 0 0 398 202 600 0 0 164 215 379 08:30 0 0 341 231 572 0 0 145 184 329 08:45 0 0 341 1370 218 932 559 2302 0 0 161 655 153 768 314 1423 09:00 0 0 250 223 473 0 0 121 147 268 09:15 0 0 289 176 465 0 0 124 178 302 09:30 0 0 280 184 464 0 0 163 133 296 09:45 0 0 336 1155 212 795 548 1950 0 0 113 521 105 563 218 1084 10:00 0 0 313 192 505 0 0 72 103 175 10:15 0 0 273 249 522 0 0 82 63 145 10:30 0 0 316 229 545 0 0 66 59 125 10:45 0 0 283 1185 255 925 538 2110 0 0 57 277 79 304 136 581 11:00 0 0 279 263 542 0 0 52 58 110 11:15 0 0 275 255 530 0 0 57 54 111 11:30 0 0 297 274 571 0 0 48 58 106 11:45 0 0 306 1157 301 1093 607 2250 0 0 40 197 45 215 85 412 TOTALS 7906 6380 14286 12360 12007 24367 SPLIT %55.3% 44.7%37.0%50.7% 49.3%63.0% NB SB EB WB 00 20,266 18,387 AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:15 16:15 15:00 15:30 AM Pk Volume 1467 1278 2722 1529 1427 2875 Pk Hr Factor 0.772 0.873 0.809 0.912 0.976 0.924 7 - 9 Volume 002827 2157 4984 002951 2552 5503 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:15 16:00 16:45 16:30 7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1467 1278 2722 0 0 1562 1320 2850 Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.772 0.873 0.809 0.000 0.000 0.932 0.940 0.930 Pk Hr Factor 4 - 6 Volume 4 - 6 Peak Hour 4 - 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS Total 38,653 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services VOLUME Lakewood Blvd Bet. Bellflower Blvd & Firestone Blvd Thursday 2/18/2016 DAILY TOTALS Total 38,653 Apx - 20 PC AGENDA PAGE 139 Prepared by NDS/ATD Day:City:Downey Date:Project #:CA16_5079_003 NB SB EB WB 23,473 19,804 00 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 50 66 0 0 116 345 319 0 0 664 00:15 45 42 0 0 87 396 336 0 0 732 00:30 38 41 0 0 79 368 309 0 0 677 00:45 34 167 33 182 0 0 67 349 334 1443 372 1336 0 0 706 2779 01:00 42 20 0 0 62 376 307 0 0 683 01:15 28 26 0 0 54 347 325 0 0 672 01:30 17 27 0 0 44 383 316 0 0 699 01:45 15 102 15 88 0 0 30 190 359 1465 329 1277 0 0 688 2742 02:00 20 24 0 0 44 381 316 0 0 697 02:15 23 10 0 0 33 365 303 0 0 668 02:30 13 10 0 0 23 374 323 0 0 697 02:45 12 68 15 59 0 0 27 127 391 1511 364 1306 0 0 755 2817 03:00 11 18 0 0 29 404 353 0 0 757 03:15 10 12 0 0 22 398 380 0 0 778 03:30 15 24 0 0 39 363 329 0 0 692 03:45 29 65 20 74 0 0 49 139 384 1549 344 1406 0 0 728 2955 04:00 23 26 0 0 49 376 342 0 0 718 04:15 39 32 0 0 71 368 346 0 0 714 04:30 36 42 0 0 78 406 362 0 0 768 04:45 61 159 48 148 0 0 109 307 385 1535 347 1397 0 0 732 2932 05:00 50 61 0 0 111 339 339 0 0 678 05:15 77 56 0 0 133 368 347 0 0 715 05:30 80 73 0 0 153 422 364 0 0 786 05:45 136 343 122 312 0 0 258 655 367 1496 314 1364 0 0 681 2860 06:00 134 121 0 0 255 368 327 0 0 695 06:15 231 134 0 0 365 328 321 0 0 649 06:30 345 181 0 0 526 392 289 0 0 681 06:45 336 1046 203 639 0 0 539 1685 344 1432 292 1229 0 0 636 2661 07:00 358 226 0 0 584 386 305 0 0 691 07:15 410 292 0 0 702 323 314 0 0 637 07:30 515 395 0 0 910 310 298 0 0 608 07:45 458 1741 335 1248 0 0 793 2989 294 1313 276 1193 0 0 570 2506 08:00 357 248 0 0 605 276 256 0 0 532 08:15 400 227 0 0 627 275 260 0 0 535 08:30 370 239 0 0 609 272 227 0 0 499 08:45 339 1466 235 949 0 0 574 2415 279 1102 222 965 0 0 501 2067 09:00 322 228 0 0 550 249 187 0 0 436 09:15 300 225 0 0 525 206 154 0 0 360 09:30 301 198 0 0 499 237 174 0 0 411 09:45 274 1197 286 937 0 0 560 2134 192 884 127 642 0 0 319 1526 10:00 257 240 0 0 497 165 117 0 0 282 10:15 308 337 0 0 645 156 133 0 0 289 10:30 316 269 0 0 585 140 89 0 0 229 10:45 296 1177 288 1134 0 0 584 2311 123 584 94 433 0 0 217 1017 11:00 320 278 0 0 598 116 77 0 0 193 11:15 309 309 0 0 618 81 55 0 0 136 11:30 326 302 0 0 628 79 67 0 0 146 11:45 306 1261 344 1233 0 0 650 2494 91 367 54 253 0 0 145 620 TOTALS 8792 7003 15795 14681 12801 27482 SPLIT %55.7% 44.3%36.5%53.4% 46.6%63.5% NB SB EB WB 23,473 19,804 00 AM Peak Hour 07:00 11:45 07:15 15:00 15:15 15:00 AM Pk Volume 1741 1308 3010 1567 1426 2987 Pk Hr Factor 0.845 0.951 0.827 0.959 0.918 0.950 7 - 9 Volume 3207 2197 005404 3031 2761 005792 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:15 07:15 16:00 16:00 16:00 7 - 9 Pk Volume 1741 1270 0 0 3010 1535 1397 0 0 2932 Pk Hr Factor 0.845 0.804 0.000 0.000 0.827 0.945 0.965 0.000 0.000 0.954 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services VOLUME Firestone Blvd n/o Lakewood Blvd Thursday 2/18/2016 DAILY TOTALS Total 43,277 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 DAILY TOTALS Total 43,277 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS Pk Hr Factor 4 - 6 Volume 4 - 6 Peak Hour 4 - 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS Apx - 21 PC AGENDA PAGE 140 Day:City:Downey Date:Project #:CA15_5407_001 NB SB EB WB 0 0 17,778 19,240 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 61 47 108 288 326 614 00:15 44 40 84 303 283 586 00:30 41 36 77 346 256 602 00:45 39 185 35 158 74 343 318 1255 279 1144 597 2399 01:00 27 37 64 332 296 628 01:15 32 38 70 301 277 578 01:30 35 19 54 308 321 629 01:45 31 125 16 110 47 235 313 1254 293 1187 606 2441 02:00 24 26 50 289 274 563 02:15 15 9 24 290 300 590 02:30 15 13 28 298 319 617 02:45 15 69 26 74 41 143 294 1171 315 1208 609 2379 03:00 18 24 42 318 293 611 03:15 25 17 42 290 297 587 03:30 26 25 51 344 283 627 03:45 27 96 25 91 52 187 310 1262 319 1192 629 2454 04:00 24 33 57 321 282 603 04:15 26 29 55 323 337 660 04:30 35 38 73 334 318 652 04:45 42 127 69 169 111 296 327 1305 332 1269 659 2574 05:00 67 62 129 322 335 657 05:15 52 75 127 345 291 636 05:30 98 111 209 348 343 691 05:45 87 304 112 360 199 664 304 1319 313 1282 617 2601 06:00 121 145 266 296 280 576 06:15 127 162 289 325 277 602 06:30 158 256 414 287 278 565 06:45 159 565 293 856 452 1421 287 1195 278 1113 565 2308 07:00 131 257 388 280 250 530 07:15 180 299 479 226 249 475 07:30 223 320 543 257 209 466 07:45 195 729 394 1270 589 1999 214 977 248 956 462 1933 08:00 242 369 611 254 224 478 08:15 201 339 540 229 215 444 08:30 178 353 531 215 239 454 08:45 176 797 301 1362 477 2159 189 887 226 904 415 1791 09:00 164 299 463 228 211 439 09:15 193 261 454 163 152 315 09:30 203 247 450 188 154 342 09:45 208 768 232 1039 440 1807 143 722 164 681 307 1403 10:00 228 262 490 118 112 230 10:15 197 253 450 95 137 232 10:30 222 252 474 102 122 224 10:45 245 892 204 971 449 1863 101 416 100 471 201 887 11:00 286 231 517 95 94 189 11:15 241 271 512 60 79 139 11:30 271 321 592 70 48 118 11:45 276 1074 283 1106 559 2180 59 284 46 267 105 551 TOTALS 5731 7566 13297 12047 11674 23721 SPLIT %43.1% 56.9%35.9%50.8% 49.2%64.1% NB SB EB WB 0 0 17,778 19,240 AM Peak Hour 11:45 07:45 11:45 16:45 16:15 16:45 AM Pk Volume 1213 1455 2361 1342 1322 2643 Pk Hr Factor 0.876 0.923 0.961 0.964 0.981 0.956 7 - 9 Volume 0 0 1526 2632 4158 0 0 2624 2551 5175 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:45 07:30 16:45 16:15 16:45 7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 861 1455 2283 0 0 1342 1322 2643 Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.889 0.923 0.934 0.000 0.000 0.964 0.981 0.956 VOLUME Prepared by NDS/ATD 13:15 13:30 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 14:30 6/30/2015 14:45 15:00 DAILY TOTALS PM Period 13:45 Tuesday 17:30 17:45 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 14:00 Firestone Blvd W/O Woodruff Ave (North) 21:30 21:45 22:00 Total 37,018 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 DAILY TOTALS 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 Total 37,018 DAILY TOTALS 21:00 21:15 TOTAL 23:45 TOTALS 20:30 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 Pk Hr Factor PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor 4 - 6 Volume 4 - 6 Peak Hour4 - 6 Pk Volume SPLIT % TOTAL 20:45 19:15 16:45 17:00 17:15 14:15 Apx - 22 PC AGENDA PAGE 141 APPENDIX D LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS Apx - 23 PC AGENDA PAGE 142 Existing Apx - 24 PC AGENDA PAGE 143 0.702Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Lakewood Ave (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 35.0035.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 154.00100.00242.00209.00100.00164.00229.00100.00242.00169.00100.00220.00Pocket Length [ft] 102102101101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 2729151831271032259302851163339121894Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6822946322586576213418530524Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 2729151831271032259302851163339121894Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 259870174121981246287809155322115889Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 8/26/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing (2020) Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 25 PC AGENDA PAGE 144 0.702Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.170.190.060.080.220.080.190.180.100.210.250.06V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 10.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 8/26/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing (2020) Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 26 PC AGENDA PAGE 145 0.785Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Lakewood Ave (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 35.0035.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 154.00100.00242.00209.00100.00164.00229.00100.00242.00169.00100.00220.00Pocket Length [ft] 102102101101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 243908197226110425128112343112491085197Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6122749572766370309786227149Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 243908197226110425128112343112491085197Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 231863187215104923926711732962371031187Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 8/26/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing (2020) Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 27 PC AGENDA PAGE 146 0.785Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.150.190.060.140.230.080.180.260.190.160.230.12V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 10.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 8/26/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 1: 1 Existing (2020) Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 28 PC AGENDA PAGE 147 Existing Plus Project Apx - 29 PC AGENDA PAGE 148 Intersection Analysis Summary 8/26/2020Report File: J:\...\AM EP.pdf Scenario 2 Existing Plus ProjectVistro File: C:\...\AM.vistro Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C20.40.143NB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject Dwy (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW)3 C21.50.152WB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopLakewood Blvd (NS) at Project Dwy (EW)2 C-0.703NB ThruICU 1SignalizedLakewood Ave (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 8/26/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 30 PC AGENDA PAGE 149 0.703Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Lakewood Ave (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 35.0035.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 154.00100.00242.00209.00100.00164.00229.00100.00242.00169.00100.00220.00Pocket Length [ft] 102102101101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 2729151831271032259302851163339122294Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6822946322586576213418530624Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 2729151831271032259302851163339122294Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000040Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000-19000-190-33-4Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000019000190334Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 259870174121981246287809155322115889Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 8/26/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 31 PC AGENDA PAGE 150 0.703Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.170.190.060.080.220.080.190.180.100.210.250.06V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 10.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 8/26/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 32 PC AGENDA PAGE 151 0.152Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 21.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Lakewood Blvd (NS) at Project Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 39012220411738Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 100306010434Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.95001.00000.95001.00000.95000.9500Peak Hour Factor 37011610391651Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 37000390Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.05201.05201.00001.00001.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 001104001569Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 8/26/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 33 PC AGENDA PAGE 152 CIntersection LOS 0.28d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 21.520.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 13.180.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.530.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CAAAMovement LOS 21.520.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.150.000.010.000.000.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 8/26/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 34 PC AGENDA PAGE 153 0.143Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 20.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Project Dwy (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 35.0035.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 14430401615390Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 361010404100Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.95001.00000.95000.95000.95001.0000Peak Hour Factor 13710381534370Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 00380370Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.00001.00001.05201.05201.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 130300145800Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 8/26/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 35 PC AGENDA PAGE 154 CIntersection LOS 0.25d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.000.0020.35d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0012.280.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.490.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAACMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0020.350.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.020.140.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 8/26/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 36 PC AGENDA PAGE 155 Intersection Analysis Summary 8/26/2020Report File: J:\...\PM EP.pdf Scenario 2 Existing Plus ProjectVistro File: C:\...\PM.vistro Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C19.40.067NB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject Dwy (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW)3 C17.80.063WB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopLakewood Blvd (NS) at Project Dwy (EW)2 C-0.782SB ThruICU 1SignalizedLakewood Ave (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 8/26/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 37 PC AGENDA PAGE 156 0.782Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Lakewood Ave (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 35.0035.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 154.00100.00242.00209.00100.00164.00229.00100.00242.00169.00100.00220.00Pocket Length [ft] 102102101101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 243908197226110225128112343092491081197Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6122749572766370309776227049Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 243908197226110225128112343092491081197Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000-2000-20-40Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000-9000-90-17-2Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0000900090172Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 231863187215104923926711732962371031187Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 8/26/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 38 PC AGENDA PAGE 157 0.782Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.150.190.060.140.230.080.180.260.190.160.230.12V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 10.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 8/26/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 39 PC AGENDA PAGE 158 0.063Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 17.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Lakewood Blvd (NS) at Project Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 19016570191531Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5041405383Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 19016570191531Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 19000190Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.05201.05201.00001.00001.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 001575001455Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 8/26/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 40 PC AGENDA PAGE 159 CIntersection LOS 0.10d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 17.810.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 5.040.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.200.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CAAAMovement LOS 17.810.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.060.000.020.000.000.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 8/26/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 41 PC AGENDA PAGE 160 0.067Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 19.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Project Dwy (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 35.0035.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 13480181664180Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 3370541650Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 13480181664180Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 00180180Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.00001.00001.05201.05201.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 128100158200Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 8/26/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 42 PC AGENDA PAGE 161 CIntersection LOS 0.11d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.000.0019.41d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.005.370.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.210.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAACMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0019.410.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.020.070.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 8/26/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 43 PC AGENDA PAGE 162 Opening Year (2022) Without Project Apx - 44 PC AGENDA PAGE 163 0.718Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Lakewood Ave (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 35.0035.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 154.00100.00242.00209.00100.00164.00229.00100.00242.00169.00100.00220.00Pocket Length [ft] 102102101101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 29094620614810462743138881803601250103Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7323752372626978222459031326Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 29094620614810462743138881803601250103Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000-19000000-4Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 13311921331511201414813Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.001.021.001.001.001.001.021.021.021.021.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 259870174121981246287809155322115889Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 11/17/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2022) Without Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 45 PC AGENDA PAGE 164 0.718Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.180.200.060.090.220.090.200.190.110.230.260.06V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 10.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 11/17/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2022) Without Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 46 PC AGENDA PAGE 165 0.810Volume to Capacity (v/c): DLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Lakewood Ave (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 35.0035.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 154.00100.00242.00209.00100.00164.00229.00100.00242.00169.00100.00220.00Pocket Length [ft] 102102101101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 256928225249112927228612823242611120205Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6423256622826872321816528051Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 256928225249112927228612823242611120205Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000-20000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000-9000000-2Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 82024233621523771310Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.001.021.001.001.001.001.021.021.021.021.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 231863187215104923926711732962371031187Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 11/17/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2022) Without Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 47 PC AGENDA PAGE 166 0.810Intersection V/C DIntersection LOS 0.160.190.070.160.240.090.180.270.200.160.230.13V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 10.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 11/17/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2022) Without Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 48 PC AGENDA PAGE 167 Opening Year (2022) With Project Apx - 49 PC AGENDA PAGE 168 Intersection Analysis Summary 11/17/2020Report File: G:\...\AM OYP.pdf Scenario 4 Opening Year (2022) With ProjectVistro File: G:\...\AM.vistro Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C22.20.196NB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject Dwy (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW)3 C22.10.156WB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopLakewood Blvd (NS) at Project Dwy (EW)2 C-0.731NB ThruICU 1SignalizedLakewood Ave (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 11/17/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 50 PC AGENDA PAGE 169 0.731Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Lakewood Ave (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 35.0035.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 154.00100.00242.00209.00100.00164.00229.00100.00242.00169.00100.00220.00Pocket Length [ft] 102102101101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 29094620614810652743138881803601254107Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7323752372666978222459031427Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 29094620614810652743138881803601254107Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000040Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000-19000-190-33-4Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 133119215215112033144117Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.001.021.001.001.001.001.021.021.021.021.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 259870174121981246287809155322115889Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 11/17/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 51 PC AGENDA PAGE 170 0.731Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.180.200.060.090.220.090.200.190.110.230.260.07V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 10.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 11/17/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 52 PC AGENDA PAGE 171 0.156Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 22.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Lakewood Blvd (NS) at Project Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 39012850411775Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 100321010444Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.95001.00000.95001.00000.95000.9500Peak Hour Factor 37012210391686Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3706003935Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.05201.05201.00001.00001.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 001104001569Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 11/17/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 53 PC AGENDA PAGE 172 CIntersection LOS 0.27d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 22.080.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 13.610.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.540.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CAAAMovement LOS 22.080.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.160.000.010.000.000.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 11/17/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 54 PC AGENDA PAGE 173 0.196Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 22.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Project Dwy (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 35.0035.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 1498135516645111Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 374314416133Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.95001.00000.95000.95000.95001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1423135215814811Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 521352474811Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.021.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.00001.00001.05201.05201.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 130300145800Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 11/17/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 55 PC AGENDA PAGE 174 CIntersection LOS 0.35d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.000.0022.16d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0017.780.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.710.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAACMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0022.160.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.020.200.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 11/17/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 56 PC AGENDA PAGE 175 Turning Movement Volume: Detail 11/17/2020Report File: G:\...\AM OYP.pdf Scenario 4 Opening Year (2022) With ProjectVistro File: G:\...\AM.vistro Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard 3104 0 199 0 - 2905 Total Volume 1423 0 52 0 1.00 1371 Thru Westbound 52 0 52 0 1.02 0 Right 1581 0 47 0 1.00 1534 Thru Eastbound 48 0 48 0 1.00 0 Right Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Project Dwy (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) 3 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 2983 0 171 0 - 2812 Total Volume 37 0 37 0 1.02 0 Right Westbound 1221 0 60 0 1.00 1161 Thru Southbound 39 0 39 0 1.00 0 Right 1686 0 35 0 1.00 1651 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Lakewood Blvd (NS) at Project Dwy (EW) 2 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 6031 0 216 0 - 5755 Total Volume 290 0 13 0 1.02 272 Right 946 0 31 0 1.00 915 Thru 206 0 19 0 1.02 183 Left Westbound 148 0 21 0 1.00 127 Right 1065 0 33 0 1.00 1032 Thru 274 0 15 0 1.00 259 Left Eastbound 313 0 11 0 1.00 302 Right 888 0 20 0 1.02 851 Thru 180 0 14 0 1.02 163 Left Southbound 360 0 14 0 1.02 339 Right 1254 0 12 0 1.02 1218 Thru 107 0 13 0 1.00 94 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Lakewood Ave (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) 1 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 11/17/2020 AM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 57 PC AGENDA PAGE 176 Intersection Analysis Summary 11/17/2020Report File: G:\...\PM OYP.pdf Scenario 4 Opening Year (2022) With ProjectVistro File: G:\...\PM.vistro Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C20.90.120NB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject Dwy (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW)3 C18.10.065WB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopLakewood Blvd (NS) at Project Dwy (EW)2 D-0.810SB ThruICU 1SignalizedLakewood Ave (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 11/17/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 58 PC AGENDA PAGE 177 0.810Volume to Capacity (v/c): DLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Lakewood Ave (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 35.0035.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 154.00100.00242.00209.00100.00164.00229.00100.00242.00169.00100.00220.00Pocket Length [ft] 102102101101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 256928225249113827228612823222611116207Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6423256622856872321816527952Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 256928225249113827228612823222611116207Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000-2000-20-40Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000-9000-90-17-2Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 820242345215231673012Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.001.021.001.001.001.001.021.021.021.021.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.05201.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 231863187215104923926711732962371031187Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 11/17/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 59 PC AGENDA PAGE 178 0.810Intersection V/C DIntersection LOS 0.160.190.070.160.240.090.180.270.200.160.230.13V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 10.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 11/17/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 60 PC AGENDA PAGE 179 0.065Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 18.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Lakewood Blvd (NS) at Project Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 19017270191561Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5043205390Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 19017270191561Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 1907001930Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.05201.05201.00001.00001.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 001575001455Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 11/17/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 61 PC AGENDA PAGE 180 CIntersection LOS 0.10d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 18.120.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 5.160.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.210.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CAAAMovement LOS 18.120.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.060.000.020.000.000.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 11/17/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 62 PC AGENDA PAGE 181 0.120Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 20.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Project Dwy (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 35.0035.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 1386122917033114Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 3473742684Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1386122917033114Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 381229393114Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.021.001.001.00Growth Rate 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.05201.00001.00001.05201.05201.0520Base Volume Adjustment Factor 128100158200Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 11/17/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 63 PC AGENDA PAGE 182 CIntersection LOS 0.21d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.000.0020.86d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0010.100.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.400.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAACMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0020.860.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.020.120.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 11/17/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 64 PC AGENDA PAGE 183 Turning Movement Volume: Detail 11/17/2020Report File: G:\...\PM OYP.pdf Scenario 4 Opening Year (2022) With ProjectVistro File: G:\...\PM.vistro Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard 3149 0 137 0 - 3012 Total Volume 1386 0 38 0 1.00 1348 Thru Westbound 29 0 29 0 1.02 0 Right 1703 0 39 0 1.00 1664 Thru Eastbound 31 0 31 0 1.00 0 Right Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Project Dwy (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) 3 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 3326 0 138 0 - 3188 Total Volume 19 0 19 0 1.02 0 Right Westbound 1727 0 70 0 1.00 1657 Thru Southbound 19 0 19 0 1.00 0 Right 1561 0 30 0 1.00 1531 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Lakewood Blvd (NS) at Project Dwy (EW) 2 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 6542 0 189 0 - 6286 Total Volume 256 0 8 0 1.02 243 Right 928 0 20 0 1.00 908 Thru 225 0 24 0 1.02 197 Left Westbound 249 0 23 0 1.00 226 Right 1138 0 34 0 1.00 1104 Thru 272 0 21 0 1.00 251 Left Eastbound 286 0 5 0 1.00 281 Right 1282 0 23 0 1.02 1234 Thru 322 0 5 0 1.02 311 Left Southbound 261 0 7 0 1.02 249 Right 1116 0 9 0 1.02 1085 Thru 207 0 10 0 1.00 197 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Lakewood Ave (NS) at Firestone Blvd (EW) 1 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 11/17/2020 PM Peak HourScenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2022) With Project Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Version 6.00-00 Generated with Apx - 65 PC AGENDA PAGE 184 APPENDIX E OTHER CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP Apx - 66 PC AGENDA PAGE 185 City of DowneyCity of Downey Legend N ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Figure XX Other Development Locaon Map Starbucks 9002 Firestone Boulevard Project Traffic Impact Analysis 19274 # MA I N S T Other Development ID in: BE L L F L O W E R B L V D W O O D R U F F A V E E IMPERIAL HWY Site LA K E W O O D B L V D FI R E S T O N E B L V D 605 105 Apx - 67 PC AGENDA PAGE 186 APPENDIX F ITE PARKING GENERATION, CITY OF DOWNEY MUNICIPAL CODE AND LAKEWOOD/FIRESTONE SPECIFIC PLAN Apx - 68 PC AGENDA PAGE 187 Apx - 69 PC AGENDA PAGE 188 Apx - 70 PC AGENDA PAGE 189 Apx - 71 PC AGENDA PAGE 190 Apx - 72 PC AGENDA PAGE 191 Apx - 73 PC AGENDA PAGE 192 Apx - 74 PC AGENDA PAGE 193 Apx - 75 PC AGENDA PAGE 194 APPENDIX G PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY COUNT DATA SHEETS Apx - 76 PC AGENDA PAGE 195 Date: 09/30/20 Re g u l a r Di s a b l e d 7:00 AM 8 0 8 7:15 AM 9 0 9 7:30 AM 6 0 6 7:45 AM 7 0 7 8:00 AM 8 0 8 8:15 AM 7 0 7 8:30 AM 7 0 7 8:45 AM 12 0 12 9:00 AM 12 0 12 9:15 AM 8 0 8 9:30 AM 12 0 12 9:45 AM 13 0 13 10:00 AM 8 0 8 10:15 AM 10 0 10 10:30 AM 12 0 12 10:45 AM 19 1 20 11:00 AM 13 0 13 11:15 AM 16 0 16 11:30 AM 12 0 12 11:45 AM 11 0 11 12:00 PM 16 0 16 12:15 PM 13 0 13 12:30 PM 12 0 12 12:45 PM 14 0 14 1:00 PM 14 0 14 Inventory 32 1 33 Prepared by AimTD LLC 714.253.7888 cs@aimtd.com Starbucks 7966 Florence Ave, Downey CA 90240 PARKING STUDY Day: Wednesday Time Spaces Grand Total Apx - 77 PC AGENDA PAGE 196 Date: 09/27/20 Re g u l a r Di s a b l e d 7:00 AM 8 0 8 7:15 AM 9 0 9 7:30 AM 8 0 8 7:45 AM 8 0 8 8:00 AM 10 0 10 8:15 AM 9 0 9 8:30 AM 9 0 9 8:45 AM 12 0 12 9:00 AM 11 0 11 9:15 AM 12 0 12 9:30 AM 9 0 9 9:45 AM 13 0 13 10:00 AM 15 0 15 10:15 AM 17 0 17 10:30 AM 14 0 14 10:45 AM 16 0 16 11:00 AM 14 0 14 11:15 AM 16 0 16 11:30 AM 18 0 18 11:45 AM 16 0 16 12:00 PM 18 0 18 12:15 PM 18 0 18 12:30 PM 23 0 23 12:45 PM 19 0 19 1:00 PM 20 0 20 Inventory 32 1 33 Prepared by AimTD LLC 714.253.7888 cs@aimtd.com Starbucks Day: Saturday Grand Total 7966 Florence Ave, Downey CA 90240 PARKING STUDY Time Spaces Apx - 78 PC AGENDA PAGE 197 Date: 09/30/20 Re g u l a r Di s a b l e d 7:00 AM 9 0 9 7:15 AM 9 0 9 7:30 AM 8 0 8 7:45 AM 9 0 9 8:00 AM 12 0 12 8:15 AM 11 0 11 8:30 AM 8 0 8 8:45 AM 12 0 12 9:00 AM 7 0 7 9:15 AM 12 0 12 9:30 AM 9 0 9 9:45 AM 14 1 15 10:00 AM 12 1 13 10:15 AM 10 0 10 10:30 AM 9 0 9 10:45 AM 9 0 9 11:00 AM 8 0 8 11:15 AM 8 0 8 11:30 AM 8 0 8 11:45 AM 8 0 8 12:00 PM 6 0 6 12:15 PM 9 0 9 12:30 PM 8 0 8 12:45 PM 7 0 7 1:00 PM 7 0 7 Inventory 18 1 19 Prepared by AimTD LLC 714.253.7888 cs@aimtd.com Starbucks 14940 Whittier Blvd, Whittier, CA 90605 PARKING STUDY Day: Wednesday Time Spaces Grand Total Apx - 79 PC AGENDA PAGE 198 Date: 09/26/20 Re g u l a r Di s a b l e d 7:00 AM 4 0 4 7:15 AM 5 0 5 7:30 AM 5 0 5 7:45 AM 6 0 6 8:00 AM 7 0 7 8:15 AM 5 0 5 8:30 AM 7 0 7 8:45 AM 6 0 6 9:00 AM 5 0 5 9:15 AM 7 0 7 9:30 AM 7 0 7 9:45 AM 6 0 6 10:00 AM 9 0 9 10:15 AM 6 0 6 10:30 AM 4 0 4 10:45 AM 6 0 6 11:00 AM 7 0 7 11:15 AM 8 0 8 11:30 AM 8 0 8 11:45 AM 7 0 7 12:00 PM 9 0 9 12:15 PM 5 0 5 12:30 PM 8 0 8 12:45 PM 6 0 6 1:00 PM 4 0 4 Inventory 18 1 19 Prepared by AimTD LLC 714.253.7888 cs@aimtd.com Starbucks Day: Saturday Grand Total 14940 Whittier Blvd, Whittier, CA 90605 PARKING STUDY Time Spaces Apx - 80 PC AGENDA PAGE 199 Date: 09/30/20 Re g u l a r Di s a b l e d 7:00 AM 6 0 6 7:15 AM 6 0 6 7:30 AM 5 0 5 7:45 AM 7 0 7 8:00 AM 9 0 9 8:15 AM 11 0 11 8:30 AM 9 0 9 8:45 AM 10 0 10 9:00 AM 10 0 10 9:15 AM 12 0 12 9:30 AM 9 0 9 9:45 AM 8 0 8 10:00 AM 8 0 8 10:15 AM 6 0 6 10:30 AM 5 0 5 10:45 AM 2 0 2 11:00 AM 5 0 5 11:15 AM 5 0 5 11:30 AM 5 0 5 11:45 AM 5 0 5 12:00 PM 4 0 4 12:15 PM 6 0 6 12:30 PM 3 0 3 12:45 PM 3 0 3 1:00 PM 3 0 3 Inventory 21 1 22 Prepared by AimTD LLC 714.253.7888 cs@aimtd.com Starbucks 15010 Imperial Hwy, La Mirada, CA 90638 PARKING STUDY Day: Wednesday Time Spaces Grand Total Apx - 81 PC AGENDA PAGE 200 Date: 09/26/20 Re g u l a r Di s a b l e d 7:00 AM 7 0 7 7:15 AM 7 0 7 7:30 AM 9 0 9 7:45 AM 7 0 7 8:00 AM 10 0 10 8:15 AM 10 0 10 8:30 AM 7 0 7 8:45 AM 7 0 7 9:00 AM 9 0 9 9:15 AM 10 0 10 9:30 AM 8 0 8 9:45 AM 9 0 9 10:00 AM 8 0 8 10:15 AM 5 0 5 10:30 AM 3 0 3 10:45 AM 4 0 4 11:00 AM 5 0 5 11:15 AM 5 0 5 11:30 AM 3 0 3 11:45 AM 3 0 3 12:00 PM 6 0 6 12:15 PM 3 0 3 12:30 PM 4 0 4 12:45 PM 4 0 4 1:00 PM 3 0 3 Inventory 21 1 22 Prepared by AimTD LLC 714.253.7888 cs@aimtd.com Starbucks Day: Saturday Grand Total 15010 Imperial Hwy, La Mirada, CA 90638 PARKING STUDY Time Spaces Apx - 82 PC AGENDA PAGE 201 APPENDIX H PARKING TURNOVER SURVEY COUNT DATA SHEETS Apx - 83 PC AGENDA PAGE 202 Location Date Number of spaces 33 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 1:00 PM 9 6 5 7 8 7 10 12 12 7 13 12 7 10 11 19 15 17 10 10 15 12 11 12 13 27%18%15%21%24%21%30%36%36%21%39%36%21%30%33%58%45%52%30%30%45%36%33%36%39% 91 Parked Duration 15 min 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Vehicles 55 20 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 # of 15 min intervals 7955 Florence Ave, Downey, CA 90240 Prepared By: AimTD LLC cs@aimtd.com Parking Turnover StudyWednesday, September 30, 2020 Time Demand Utilization % Unique Cars Total Apx - 84 PC AGENDA PAGE 203 Starbucks Parking Turnover Study, 09/30/2020, Wednesday Spot #7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 9:00 9:15 9:30 9:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 11:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 2 3 4 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 1 2 3 6 1 2 2 2 3 7 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 1 1 1 2 3 3 4 9 1 1 10 1 2 2 11 1 2 12 1 13 1 2 2 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 14 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 20 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 21 1 2 2 3 3 4 22 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 23 1 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 24 25 1 2 2 26 1 1 2 3 4 27 1 2 3 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 30 1 2 3 31 1 2 32 1 33 1 7955 Florence Ave, Downey, CA 90240 Prepared By: AimTD LLC cs@aimtd.com Apx - 85 PC AGENDA PAGE 204 Location Date Number of spaces 33 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 1:00 PM 9 7 8 7 9 10 9 12 10 11 11 13 14 17 11 14 12 16 17 15 16 15 21 16 17 27%21%24%21%27%30%27%36%30%33%33%39%42%52%33%42%36%48%52%45%48%45%64%48%52% 92 Parked Duration 15 min 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Vehicles 54 15 4 3 2 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 # of 15 min intervals 7955 Florence Ave, Downey, CA 90240 Prepared By: AimTD LLC cs@aimtd.com Parking Turnover StudySaturday, September 26, 2020 Time Demand Utilization % Unique Cars Total Apx - 86 PC AGENDA PAGE 205 Starbucks Parking Turnover Study, 09/26/2020, Saturday Spot #7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 9:00 9:15 9:30 9:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 11:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 5 1 2 3 3 4 5 5 6 1 2 2 3 4 7 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 8 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 9 1 1 2 3 10 1 2 3 4 5 11 1 2 12 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 13 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 14 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 1 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 1 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 21 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 23 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 25 1 26 27 28 1 1 1 29 1 2 3 30 1 1 31 1 2 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 32 1 33 1 7955 Florence Ave, Downey, CA 90240 Prepared By: AimTD LLC cs@aimtd.com Apx - 87 PC AGENDA PAGE 206 Location Date Number of spaces 19 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 1:00 PM 9 9 8 9 12 11 8 12 7 12 9 14 12 10 9 9 8 8 8 8 6 9 8 7 7 47%47%42%47%63%58%42%63%37%63%47%74%63%53%47%47%42%42%42%42%32%47%42%37%37% 60 Parked Duration 15 min 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Vehicles 38 9 2 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 # of 15 min intervals 14940 Whittier Blvd, Whittier, CA 90605 Prepared By: AimTD LLC cs@aimtd.com Parking Turnover StudyWednesday, September 30, 2020 Time Demand Utilization % Unique Cars Total Apx - 88 PC AGENDA PAGE 207 Starbucks Parking Turnover Study, 09/30/2020, Wednesday Spot #7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 9:00 9:15 9:30 9:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 11:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 1 2 3 1 2 4 5 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 12 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 8 9 10 13 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 11 12 13 14 15 14 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 15 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 7 8 16 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 3 17 1 1 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 19 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 14940 Whittier Blvd, Whittier, CA 90605 Prepared By: AimTD LLC cs@aimtd.com Apx - 89 PC AGENDA PAGE 208 Location Date Number of spaces 19 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 1:00 PM 4 5 5 6 7 5 7 6 5 7 7 6 9 6 4 6 7 8 8 7 9 5 8 6 4 21%26%26%32%37%26%37%32%26%37%37%32%47%32%21%32%37%42%42%37%47%26%42%32%21% 44 Parked Duration 15 min 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Vehicles 28 4 1 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 # of 15 min intervals 14940 Whittier Blvd, Whittier, CA 90605 Prepared By: AimTD LLC cs@aimtd.com Parking Turnover StudySaturday, September 26, 2020 Time Demand Utilization % Unique Cars Total Apx - 90 PC AGENDA PAGE 209 Starbucks Parking Turnover Study, 09/26/2020, Saturday Spot #7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 9:00 9:15 9:30 9:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 11:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 6 7 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 13 1 2 3 3 3 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 9 9 10 11 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 9 10 15 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 17 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 1 1 1 1 14940 Whittier Blvd, Whittier, CA 90605 Prepared By: AimTD LLC cs@aimtd.com Apx - 91 PC AGENDA PAGE 210 Location Date Number of spaces 22 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 1:00 PM 6 6 5 7 9 11 9 10 10 12 9 8 8 6 5 2 5 5 5 5 4 6 3 3 3 27%27%23%32%41%50%41%45%45%55%41%36%36%27%23%9%23%23%23%23%18%27%14%14%14% 58 Parked Duration 15 min 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Vehicles 30 7 5 4 4 2 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # of 15 min intervals 15010 Imperial Hwy, La Mirada, CA 90638 Prepared By: AimTD LLC cs@aimtd.com Parking Turnover StudyWednesday, September 30, 2020 Time Demand Utilization % Unique Cars Total Apx - 92 PC AGENDA PAGE 211 Starbucks Parking Turnover Study, 09/30/2020, Wednesday Spot #7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 9:00 9:15 9:30 9:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 11:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 1 2 1 2 3 1 4 1 1 5 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 8 1 1 1 1 1 2 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 5 5 5 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 14 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 16 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 17 1 2 3 4 4 4 5 5 6 18 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 4 5 19 1 1 1 1 2 20 1 1 2 2 2 3 21 1 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 22 15010 Imperial Hwy, La Mirada, CA 90638 Prepared By: AimTD LLC cs@aimtd.com Apx - 93 PC AGENDA PAGE 212 Location Date Number of spaces 22 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 1:00 PM 7 7 9 7 10 10 7 7 9 10 8 9 8 5 3 4 5 5 3 3 6 3 4 4 3 32%32%41%32%45%45%32%32%41%45%36%41%36%23%14%18%23%23%14%14%27%14%18%18%14% 38 Parked Duration 15 min 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Vehicles 24 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 # of 15 min intervals 15010 Imperial Hwy, La Mirada, CA 90638 Prepared By: AimTD LLC cs@aimtd.com Parking Turnover StudySaturday, September 26, 2020 Time Demand Utilization % Unique Cars Total Apx - 94 PC AGENDA PAGE 213 Starbucks Parking Turnover Study, 09/26/2020, Saturday Spot #7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 9:00 9:15 9:30 9:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 11:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 1 2 3 1 4 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 2 2 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 1 2 2 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 1 2 14 1 1 2 15 1 2 3 4 4 16 1 2 3 17 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 5 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 1 2 20 1 21 1 2 3 22 15010 Imperial Hwy, La Mirada, CA 90638 Prepared By: AimTD LLC cs@aimtd.com Apx - 95 PC AGENDA PAGE 214 APPENDIX I DRIVE-THROUGH LANE QUEUEING SURVEY COUNT DATA SHEETS Apx - 96 PC AGENDA PAGE 215 Date: 09/30/20 To t h e Or d e r Bo a r d Be t w e e n th e O r d e r Bo a r d a n d Pi c k U p 7:00 AM 4 4 8 7:15 AM 3 3 6 7:30 AM 3 4 7 7:45 AM 8 4 12 8:00 AM 10 4 14 8:15 AM 8 4 12 8:30 AM 10 4 14 8:45 AM 8 3 11 9:00 AM 8 4 12 9:15 AM 4 3 7 9:30 AM 1 4 5 9:45 AM 6 4 10 10:00 AM 5 4 9 10:15 AM 4 4 8 10:30 AM 1 2 3 10:45 AM 3 4 7 11:00 AM 5 3 8 11:15 AM 4 4 8 11:30 AM 5 4 9 11:45 AM 7 3 10 12:00 PM 5 4 9 12:15 PM 8 3 11 12:30 PM 6 4 10 12:45 PM 5 4 9 1:00 PM 3 1 4 Prepared by AimTD LLC 714.253.7888 cs@aimtd.com Grand Total QUEUE STUDY Day: Wednesday Time Queue Starbucks 7966 Florence Ave, Downey CA 90240 Apx - 97 PC AGENDA PAGE 216 Date: 09/27/20 To t h e Or d e r Bo a r d Be t w e e n th e O r d e r Bo a r d a n d Pi c k U p 7:00 AM 1 1 2 7:15 AM 1 1 2 7:30 AM 5 1 6 7:45 AM 8 1 9 8:00 AM 3 3 6 8:15 AM 4 2 6 8:30 AM 6 2 8 8:45 AM 9 3 12 9:00 AM 4 1 5 9:15 AM 10 3 13 9:30 AM 18 5 23 9:45 AM 19 4 23 10:00 AM 8 4 12 10:15 AM 8 4 12 10:30 AM 9 4 13 10:45 AM 8 5 13 11:00 AM 9 4 13 11:15 AM 10 4 14 11:30 AM 8 5 13 11:45 AM 9 4 13 12:00 PM 8 4 12 12:15 PM 7 3 10 12:30 PM 7 2 9 12:45 PM 8 3 11 1:00 PM 7 4 11 Prepared by AimTD LLC 714.253.7888 cs@aimtd.com QUEUE STUDY Day: Saturday Time Queue Grand Total Starbucks 7966 Florence Ave, Downey CA 90240 Apx - 98 PC AGENDA PAGE 217 Date: 9/30/20 To t h e Or d e r Bo a r d Be t w e e n th e O r d e r Bo a r d a n d Pi c k U p 7:00 AM 5 2 7 7:15 AM 6 3 9 7:30 AM 5 4 9 7:45 AM 2 3 5 8:00 AM 9 4 13 8:15 AM 10 4 14 8:30 AM 8 4 12 8:45 AM 7 4 11 9:00 AM 5 4 9 9:15 AM 1 3 4 9:30 AM 4 4 8 9:45 AM 9 4 13 10:00 AM 9 4 13 10:15 AM 5 3 8 10:30 AM 8 4 12 10:45 AM 5 4 9 11:00 AM 5 3 8 11:15 AM 8 4 12 11:30 AM 4 3 7 11:45 AM 4 3 7 12:00 PM 6 4 10 12:15 PM 4 3 7 12:30 PM 5 4 9 12:45 PM 6 3 9 1:00 PM 6 3 9 Prepared by AimTD LLC 714.253.7888 cs@aimtd.com Grand Total QUEUE STUDY Day: Wednesday Time Queue 14940 Whittier Blvd, Whittier, CA 90605 Starbucks Apx - 99 PC AGENDA PAGE 218 Date: 09/26/20 To t h e Or d e r Bo a r d Be t w e e n th e O r d e r Bo a r d a n d Pi c k U p 7:00 AM 1 2 3 7:15 AM 1 3 4 7:30 AM 2 3 5 7:45 AM 0 1 1 8:00 AM 1 1 2 8:15 AM 5 2 7 8:30 AM 8 4 12 8:45 AM 7 4 11 9:00 AM 11 4 15 9:15 AM 8 2 10 9:30 AM 9 3 12 9:45 AM 8 3 11 10:00 AM 11 4 15 10:15 AM 12 3 15 10:30 AM 9 2 11 10:45 AM 8 4 12 11:00 AM 11 4 15 11:15 AM 12 4 16 11:30 AM 6 3 9 11:45 AM 3 3 6 12:00 PM 3 4 7 12:15 PM 9 3 12 12:30 PM 7 4 11 12:45 PM 6 4 10 1:00 PM 10 4 14 Prepared by AimTD LLC 714.253.7888 cs@aimtd.com QUEUE STUDY Day: Saturday Time Queue Grand Total 14940 Whittier Blvd, Whittier, CA 90605 Starbucks Apx - 100 PC AGENDA PAGE 219 Date: 09/30/20 To t h e Or d e r Bo a r d Be t w e e n th e O r d e r Bo a r d a n d Pi c k U p 7:00 AM 3 4 7 7:15 AM 2 1 3 7:30 AM 3 3 6 7:45 AM 6 5 11 8:00 AM 5 4 9 8:15 AM 4 4 8 8:30 AM 5 4 9 8:45 AM 6 6 12 9:00 AM 2 4 6 9:15 AM 3 4 7 9:30 AM 3 4 7 9:45 AM 3 3 6 10:00 AM 3 2 5 10:15 AM 8 5 13 10:30 AM 4 3 7 10:45 AM 5 3 8 11:00 AM 5 4 9 11:15 AM 7 4 11 11:30 AM 2 4 6 11:45 AM 1 1 2 12:00 PM 1 3 4 12:15 PM 8 4 12 12:30 PM 5 3 8 12:45 PM 6 4 10 1:00 PM 7 3 10 Prepared by AimTD LLC 714.253.7888 cs@aimtd.com Grand Total QUEUE STUDY Day: Wednesday Time Queue Starbucks 15010 Imperial Hwy, La Mirada, CA 90638 Apx - 101 PC AGENDA PAGE 220 Date: 09/26/20 To t h e Or d e r Bo a r d Be t w e e n th e O r d e r Bo a r d a n d Pi c k U p 7:00 AM 2 1 3 7:15 AM 3 1 4 7:30 AM 2 1 3 7:45 AM 1 2 3 8:00 AM 3 1 4 8:15 AM 4 4 8 8:30 AM 4 3 7 8:45 AM 3 3 6 9:00 AM 5 3 8 9:15 AM 4 6 10 9:30 AM 8 5 13 9:45 AM 9 4 13 10:00 AM 10 5 15 10:15 AM 9 5 14 10:30 AM 9 5 14 10:45 AM 10 5 15 11:00 AM 8 4 12 11:15 AM 8 4 12 11:30 AM 7 4 11 11:45 AM 8 5 13 12:00 PM 9 3 12 12:15 PM 9 5 14 12:30 PM 6 6 12 12:45 PM 3 4 7 1:00 PM 7 4 11 Prepared by AimTD LLC 714.253.7888 cs@aimtd.com QUEUE STUDY Day: Saturday Time Queue Grand Total Starbucks 15010 Imperial Hwy, La Mirada, CA 90638 Apx - 102 PC AGENDA PAGE 221 APPENDIX J COLLISION HISTORY DATA SHEETS Apx - 103 PC AGENDA PAGE 222 Co l l i s i o n S u m m a r y R e p o r t Ci t y o f D o w n e y En g i n e e r i n g D i v i s i o n 7/20/20 Fr o m 1 / 1 / 2 0 1 6 t o 1 2 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 8 To t a l C o l l i s i o n s : 3 8 In j u r y C o l l i s i o n s : 2 5 Fa t a l C o l l i s i o n s : 0 LA K E W O O D B L & F I R E S T O N E B L Page 1 of 7 71 7 1 4 0 4 1/ 4 / 2 0 1 6 1 0 : 5 3 Mo n d a y Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Au t o R/ W Vi o l a t i o n 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 21 8 0 1 A H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 79 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 19 9 9 T O Y O T A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 25 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 1 T O Y O T A 71 7 7 2 7 2 1/ 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 1 1 : 0 8 Su n d a y Re a r ‐En d Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Un s a f e Sp e e d 70 ' D i r e c t i o n : Ea s t Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 22 3 5 0 H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l o u d y P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 40 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: No t St a t e d We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 5 H O N D A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 54 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: No t St a t e d We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 9 F O R D 72 0 8 8 3 4 2/ 6 / 2 0 1 6 1 7 : 5 7 Sa t u r d a y Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Au t o R/ W Vi o l a t i o n 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Ot h e r Vi s i b l e Injury # Inj: 4# Killed: 0 21 8 0 1 A H i t & Ru n : No Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 62 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 1 H O N D A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 27 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 5 I N F I N I T I No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 54 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r Ea s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 3 20 0 5 K I A 80 3 6 0 6 7 3/ 2 4 / 2 0 1 6 1 3 : 4 9 Th u r s d a y Si d e s w i p e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Un s a f e La n e Ch a n g e 30 0 ' D i r e c t i o n : No r t h Pr o p e r t y Damage Only # Inj: 0# Killed: 0 21 6 5 8 A H i t & Ru n : Mi s d e Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d No t St a t e d A g e: Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ch a n g in g La n e s So b r i e t y : Im p ai r m e n t No t Kn o Ve h T yp e: Pi c k u p Tr u c k No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 2 G M C No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 22 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 1 6 H O N D A 80 2 7 6 7 8 3/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 6 1 8 : 2 9 Mo n d a y Hi t Ob j e c t Fi x e d Ob j e c t LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Ot h e r Ha z a r d o u s Mo v e m e n t 15 0 ' D i r e c t i o n : No r t h Pr o p e r t y Damage Only # Inj: 0# Killed: 0 28 0 0 1 H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 22 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Ri g ht Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 0 1 N I S S A N 80 3 7 2 1 4 4/ 2 / 2 0 1 6 1 9 : 5 7 Sa t u r d a y Si d e s w i p e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Dr i v i n g Un d e r In f l u e n c e 40 ' D i r e c t i o n : Ea s t Pr o p e r t y Damage Only # Inj: 0# Killed: 0 23 1 5 2 A H i t & Ru n : Mi s d e Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 Ap x - 1 0 4 PC AG E N D A PAGE 223 LA K E W O O D B L & F I R E S T O N E B L Page 2 of 7 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 20 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : Vi o l a t i o n Ch a n g in g La n e s So b r i e t y : HB D Un d e r In f l u e n c Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 0 5 C H E V R O L E T No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 50 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r wi t h Tr We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 1 H O N D A 80 3 6 0 7 5 4/ 5 / 2 0 1 6 1 7 : 0 4 Tu e s d a y Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Au t o R/ W Vi o l a t i o n 37 ' D i r e c t i o n : No r t h Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 2# Killed: 0 21 8 0 1 A H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 33 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pi c k u p Tr u c k No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 0 1 F O R D No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 38 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pi c k u p Tr u c k So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 2 T O Y O T A No t St a t e d No t St a t e d A g e: 54 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 3 20 0 8 N I S S A N 80 7 0 2 1 6 5/ 6 / 2 0 1 6 0 0 : 0 7 Fr i d a y Re a r ‐En d Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Dr i v i n g Un d e r In f l u e n c e 30 ' D i r e c t i o n : Ea s t Pr o p e r t y Damage Only # Inj: 0# Killed: 0 23 1 5 2 A H i t & Ru n : No Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l o u d y P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 38 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HB D Un d e r In f l u e n c Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 1 M E R C E D E S ‐BE N Z No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 21 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 19 9 9 L E X U S 80 6 0 3 7 4 5/ 1 4 / 2 0 1 6 1 4 : 2 6 Sa t u r d a y Ot h e r Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Un k n o w n 85 ' D i r e c t i o n : Ea s t Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 Hi t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault: No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 75 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 0 T O Y O T A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 34 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 0 H O N D A 80 8 4 3 4 7 5/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 6 2 1 : 1 1 We d n e s d a y Re a r ‐En d Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Un s a f e Sp e e d 15 0 ' D i r e c t i o n : Ea s t Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 22 3 5 0 H i t & Ru n : No Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 22 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : No t A pp li c a b l e Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 0 9 F O R D No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 19 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : No t A pp li c a b l e Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 1 5 K I A 80 9 2 1 6 0 6/ 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 2 2 : 4 9 Tu e s d a y Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Dr i v i n g Un d e r In f l u e n c e 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 23 1 5 2 A H i t & Ru n : No Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 49 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HB D Un d e r In f l u e n c Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r Ea s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 0 3 T O Y O T A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 43 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 3 H O N D A 81 0 0 7 3 3 7/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 6 0 0 : 2 2 Fr i d a y Hi t Ob j e c t Fi x e d Ob j e c t FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Dr i v i n g Un d e r In f l u e n c e 29 8 ' D i r e c t i o n : Ea s t Pr o p e r t y Damage Only # Inj: 0# Killed: 0 23 1 5 2 A H i t & Ru n : No Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 32 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Ri g ht Tu r n So b r i e t y : HB D Un d e r In f l u e n c Ve h T yp e: Pi c k u p Tr u c k We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 0 0 C H E V R O L E T Ap x - 1 0 5 PC AG E N D A PAGE 224 LA K E W O O D B L & F I R E S T O N E B L Page 3 of 7 81 1 2 3 6 5 7/ 2 2 / 2 0 1 6 0 9 : 5 6 Fr i d a y Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Au t o R/ W Vi o l a t i o n 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 21 8 0 1 A H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 21 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: No t St a t e d No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 5 D O D G E No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 23 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: No t St a t e d No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 7 I N F I N I T I No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 69 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: No t St a t e d So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 3 20 0 9 S U Z U K I 81 1 1 6 0 1 8/ 1 / 2 0 1 6 1 7 : 4 2 Mo n d a y He a d ‐On Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Au t o R/ W Vi o l a t i o n 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 2# Killed: 0 21 8 0 1 A H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 53 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: No t St a t e d We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 4 I N F I N I T I No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 58 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: No t St a t e d So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 5 N I S S A N 81 1 1 5 9 6 8/ 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 1 5 : 4 9 We d n e s d a y Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Au t o R/ W Vi o l a t i o n 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 2# Killed: 0 21 8 0 1 A H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 45 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 0 3 H Y U N D A I No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 25 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 7 I N F I N I T I 80 6 3 1 0 6 8/ 1 9 / 2 0 1 6 2 1 : 2 9 Fr i d a y Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Au t o R/ W Vi o l a t i o n 20 ' D i r e c t i o n : So u t h Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 2# Killed: 0 21 8 0 1 A H i t & Ru n : No Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 68 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 0 0 L I N C O L N No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 51 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 1 2 T O Y O T A 81 0 3 3 7 9 8/ 3 1 / 2 0 1 6 1 7 : 2 9 We d n e s d a y Re a r ‐En d Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Un s a f e Sp e e d 14 7 ' D i r e c t i o n : Ea s t Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 2# Killed: 0 22 3 5 0 H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 65 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 6 M E R C E D E S ‐BE N Z No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 46 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 19 9 2 H O N D A 81 5 5 5 1 6 9/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 6 1 6 : 0 3 Th u r s d a y He a d ‐On Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Au t o R/ W Vi o l a t i o n 24 ' D i r e c t i o n : Ea s t Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 2# Killed: 0 21 8 0 1 A H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 28 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 19 9 7 H O N D A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 76 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 19 9 9 M E R C E D E S ‐BE N Z 81 5 5 5 0 0 9/ 1 7 / 2 0 1 6 2 0 : 1 0 Sa t u r d a y Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Au t o R/ W Vi o l a t i o n 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 21 8 0 1 A H i t & Ru n : No Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 Ap x - 1 0 6 PC AG E N D A PAGE 225 LA K E W O O D B L & F I R E S T O N E B L Page 4 of 7 No t St a t e d No t St a t e d A g e: No t St a As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : Im p ai r m e n t No t Kn o Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 0 T O Y O T A No t St a t e d No t St a t e d A g e: 37 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Mo t o r c y cl e So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 7 H A R L E Y ‐DA V I D S 81 5 5 4 5 1 9/ 1 8 / 2 0 1 6 0 2 : 0 3 Su n d a y Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Dr i v i n g Un d e r In f l u e n c e 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 23 1 5 2 A H i t & Ru n : No Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 26 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : Vi o l a t i o n Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HB D Un d e r In f l u e n c Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 0 C H E V R O L E T No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 31 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HB D No t Un d e r In f l u Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 7 T O Y O T A 81 4 2 8 4 5 9/ 2 1 / 2 0 1 6 1 2 : 3 1 We d n e s d a y Ot h e r Bi c y c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Wr o n g Si d e of Ro a d 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Pr o p e r t y Damage Only # Inj: 0# Killed: 0 21 6 5 0 1 H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d No t St a t e d A g e: 21 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Tr a v e l i n g Wr o n g Wa y So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Bi c y cl e No r t h Bi c y cl i s t Pa r t y 1 0 ‐ No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 45 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Ri g ht Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Em e r g en c y Ve h i c l e We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 1 5 T O Y O T A 81 5 5 2 7 2 10 / 2 / 2 0 1 6 1 3 : 4 5 Su n d a y Si d e s w i p e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Un s a f e La n e Ch a n g e 13 0 ' D i r e c t i o n : Ea s t Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 21 6 5 8 A H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 69 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ch a n g in g La n e s So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r Ea s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 3 H O N D A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 18 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Tr u c k Ea s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 8 P E T E R B I L T 81 7 1 8 3 9 10 / 9 / 2 0 1 6 2 0 : 2 5 Su n d a y Re a r ‐En d Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Dr i v i n g Un d e r In f l u e n c e 0' D i r e c t i o n : So u t h Pr o p e r t y Damage Only # Inj: 0# Killed: 0 23 1 5 2 A H i t & Ru n : No Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 34 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pa s s i n g Ot h e r Ve h i c l e So b r i e t y : HB D Un d e r In f l u e n c Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 6 K I A No t St a t e d Un k n o w n A g e: No t St a As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : Im p ai r m e n t No t Kn o Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 0 ‐ 81 8 2 0 0 9 11 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 6 1 5 : 4 6 Su n d a y Re a r ‐En d Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Un s a f e St a r t i n g or Ba c k i n g 10 5 ' D i r e c t i o n : No r t h Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 22 1 0 6 H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 85 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 1 T O Y O T A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 76 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 19 9 2 C H E V R O L E T No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 25 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 3 20 1 0 A C U R A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 25 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 4 20 0 8 N I S S A N 81 9 3 0 2 8 11 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 6 2 2 : 4 7 Sa t u r d a y Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Au t o R/ W Vi o l a t i o n 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 21 8 0 1 A H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 32 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 3 C H E V R O L E T Ap x - 1 0 7 PC AG E N D A PAGE 226 LA K E W O O D B L & F I R E S T O N E B L Page 5 of 7 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 51 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 1 4 T O Y O T A 82 8 4 2 7 2 12 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 6 1 3 : 3 0 Tu e s d a y Si d e s w i p e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Un k n o w n 45 ' D i r e c t i o n : No r t h Pr o p e r t y Damage Only # Inj: 0# Killed: 0 Hi t & Ru n : Mi s d e Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault: No t St a t e d No t St a t e d A g e: Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 0 6 H O N D A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 20 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ch a n g in g La n e s So b r i e t y : Im p ai r m e n t No t Kn o Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 1 4 T O Y O T A 82 8 4 0 5 3 12 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 6 1 7 : 1 6 Tu e s d a y Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Au t o R/ W Vi o l a t i o n 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Ot h e r Vi s i b l e Injury # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 21 8 0 1 H i t & Ru n : No Du s k ‐ Da w n C l e a r P t y at Fault: No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 47 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: No t St a t e d We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 0 7 N I S S A N No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 49 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: No t St a t e d So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 4 N I S S A N 83 1 1 4 6 9 1/ 5 / 2 0 1 7 1 2 : 1 7 Th u r s d a y Re a r ‐En d Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Un s a f e St a r t i n g or Ba c k i n g 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Pr o p e r t y Damage Only # Inj: 0# Killed: 0 22 1 0 6 H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l o u d y P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 29 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r Ea s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 3 S C I O N No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 26 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pi c k u p Tr u c k Ea s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 8 F O R D 83 1 1 5 4 4 1/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 7 1 9 : 3 5 Fr i d a y Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Au t o R/ W Vi o l a t i o n 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 21 8 0 1 A H i t & Ru n : No Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l o u d y P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 30 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 6 H O N D A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g De p lo y ed A g e: 17 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 0 C H E V R O L E T 83 2 7 7 8 0 2/ 4 / 2 0 1 7 2 1 : 1 5 Sa t u r d a y Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Dr i v i n g Un d e r In f l u e n c e 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Pr o p e r t y Damage Only # Inj: 0# Killed: 0 23 1 5 2 A H i t & Ru n : No Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 58 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HB D Un d e r In f l u e n c Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 7 T O Y O T A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 53 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 7 C H R Y S L E R 83 5 0 9 7 0 3/ 9 / 2 0 1 7 2 2 : 4 7 Th u r s d a y Si d e s w i p e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Im p r o p e r Tu r n i n g 11 ' D i r e c t i o n : So u t h Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 22 1 0 7 H i t & Ru n : Mi s d e Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d No t St a t e d A g e: Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : Im p ai r m e n t No t Kn o Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r Ea s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 19 9 1 H O N D A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 24 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 5 H Y U N D A I 83 5 0 9 2 8 3/ 1 8 / 2 0 1 7 0 8 : 1 4 Sa t u r d a y Ve h i c l e ‐ Pe d e s t r i a n P e d e s t r i a n FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Pe d e s t r i a n Vi o l a t i o n 10 5 ' D i r e c t i o n : Ea s t Ot h e r Vi s i b l e Injury # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 21 9 5 4 A H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l o u d y P t y at Fault:1 Ap x - 1 0 8 PC AG E N D A PAGE 227 LA K E W O O D B L & F I R E S T O N E B L Page 6 of 7 No t St a t e d No t St a t e d A g e: 17 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d No t St a t e d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pe d e s t r i a n No r t h Pe d e s t r i a n Pa r t y 1 0 ‐ No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 54 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pi c k u p Tr u c k We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 4 C H E V R O L E T 83 5 0 8 3 6 3/ 2 2 / 2 0 1 7 0 6 : 1 4 We d n e s d a y Si d e s w i p e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Au t o R/ W Vi o l a t i o n 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 21 8 0 1 A H i t & Ru n : No Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 65 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r No r t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 3 M E R C E D E S ‐BE N Z No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 54 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pi c k u p Tr u c k So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 19 9 4 T O Y O T A 83 7 1 6 8 9 4/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 7 1 8 : 3 4 Th u r s d a y Re a r ‐En d Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Un s a f e Sp e e d 0' D i r e c t i o n : No t St a t e d Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 3# Killed: 0 22 3 5 0 H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 23 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 4 T O Y O T A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 60 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 1 6 H Y U N D A I 84 1 3 0 7 1 6/ 1 0 / 2 0 1 7 1 6 : 2 0 Sa t u r d a y Re a r ‐En d Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Un s a f e Sp e e d 38 ' D i r e c t i o n : We s t Co m p l a i n t of Pain # Inj: 1# Killed: 0 22 3 5 0 H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d No t Re q ui r e d A g e: 76 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Ri g ht Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Mo t o r c y cl e So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 0 2 H A R L E Y ‐DA V I D S No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 49 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 19 9 8 N I S S A N 84 1 2 0 8 4 6/ 1 9 / 2 0 1 7 0 8 : 3 0 Mo n d a y Si d e s w i p e Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e LA K E W O O D BL ‐ FI R E S T O N E BL Au t o R/ W Vi o l a t i o n 80 ' D i r e c t i o n : No r t h Pr o p e r t y Damage Only # Inj: 0# Killed: 0 21 4 5 3 B H i t & Ru n : No Da y l i g h t C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 56 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Ri g ht Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 0 5 T O Y O T A No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 93 Fe m a l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Le f t Tu r n So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r Ea s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 19 9 5 S A T U R N 87 9 0 7 4 4 12 / 2 3 / 2 0 1 8 0 0 : 2 9 Su n d a y Re a r ‐En d Ot h e r Mo t o r Ve h i c l e FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Dr i v i n g Un d e r In f l u e n c e 21 ' D i r e c t i o n : Ea s t Pr o p e r t y Damage Only # Inj: 0# Killed: 0 23 1 5 2 A H i t & Ru n : No Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 24 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Pr o c e e d i n g St r a i g ht So b r i e t y : HB D Un d e r In f l u e n c Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 5 L E X U S Pa s s e n g e r Ca r , St a t i o n Wagon, Jeep No In j ur y No t St a t e d Ai r Ba g No t De p lo y ed A g e: 21 Ma l e As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d St o pp ed in Ro a d So b r i e t y : HN B D Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r We s t Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 19 9 5 B M W Pa s s e n g e r Ca r , St a t i o n Wagon, Jeep No In j ur y 87 9 0 8 3 8 12 / 2 9 / 2 0 1 8 0 1 : 0 9 Sa t u r d a y Hi t Ob j e c t Fi x e d Ob j e c t FI R E S T O N E BL ‐ LA K E W O O D BL Im p r o p e r Tu r n i n g 30 ' D i r e c t i o n : We s t Pr o p e r t y Damage Only # Inj: 0# Killed: 0 22 1 0 7 H i t & Ru n : Mi s d e Da r k ‐ St r e e t Ligh C l e a r P t y at Fault:1 No t St a t e d No t St a t e d A g e: No t St a As s o c Fa c t o r : No t St a t e d Ma k i n g Ri g ht Tu r n So b r i e t y : Im p ai r m e n t No t Kn o Ve h T yp e: Pa s s e n g er Ca r So u t h Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 0 5 H O N D A Pa s s e n g e r Ca r , St a t i o n Wagon, Jeep No In j ur y Ap x - 1 0 9 PC AG E N D A PAGE 228 LA K E W O O D B L & F I R E S T O N E B L Page 7 of 7 Se t t i n g s f o r Q u e r y : St r e e t : L A K E W O O D B L Cr o s s S t r e e t : F I R E S T O N E B L In t e r s e c t i o n R e l a t e d : T r u e So r t e d B y : D a t e a n d T i m e Ap x - 1 1 0 PC AG E N D A PAGE 229 GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202, Santa Ana, CA 92705 714.795.3100 | www.ganddini.com PC AGENDA PAGE 230 DOWNEY, CA DRAWING INDEXPROJECT INFORMATION COVER SHEETPROJECT LOCATION 9002 FIRESTONE BLVD DOWNEY, CA 90241 ZONING JURISDICTION: CITY OF DOWNEY, CA EXISTING ZONE: SP-91-2 LAKEWOOD/FIRESTONE SPECIFIC PLAN SUBAREA 5, SECTION A PROPOSED ZONE: SP-91-2 LAKEWOOD/FIRESTONE SPECIFIC PLAN SUBAREA 5, SECTION A ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER APN 6284-006-021 SHEET 01 SHEET 02 SHEET 03 - 1.2.3. SITE VICINITY MAPCONTACTS SHEET 04 SHEET 05 CIVIL ENGINEER GREENBERGFARROW 30 EXECUTIVE PARK, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92614 t: 949.296.0450 f: 949.296.0437 CONTACT: BAHAREH SEHATZADEH, Registration No. C89859 bsehatzadeh@greenbergfarrow.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT GREENBERGFARROW 30 EXECUTIVE PARK, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92614 t: 949.296.0450 f: 949.296.0437 CONTACT: KURT KOETHER, RLA, No. 5557 kkoether@greenbergfarrow.com ALTA SURVEY (3 SHEETS) SITE PLAN CONCEPTUAL DEMOLITION PLAN CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION FLOOR PLANSHEET 08 ARCHITECT GREENBERGFARROW 30 EXECUTIVE PARK, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92614 t: 949.296.0450 f: 949.296.0437 CONTACT: DOUGLAS COUPER, ARCHITECT, No. C25874 dcouper@greenbergfarrow.com 30 Executive Park, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614 t: 949 296 0450 f: 949 296 0479 COVER SHEET 08.06.2020 SHEET 09 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (BLACK & WHITE) STARBUCKS FIRESTONE BLVD & LAKEWOOD BLVD DOWNEY, CA 20190420.0 THAT PORTION OF BLOCK "Q" OF THE RANCHO SANTA GERTRUDES. IN THE CITY OF DOWNEY, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 502 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EASTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CURVE CONCAVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 18.00 FEET AND A LENGTH OF 29.59 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED MARCH 4, 1937 IN BOOK 14758, PAGE 280, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE MOST NORTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED JULY 20, 1949 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2446, IN BOOK 30587, PAGE 180, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK "Q” TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK AND WHICH PASSES THROUGH A POINT IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LAKEWOOD BOULEVARD, AS DESCRIBED IN THE FIRST HEREIN MENTIONED DEED, DISTANT SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, 125.00 FEET, FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY TERMINUS OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED CURVE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE LAST MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE THROUGH THE LAST MENTIONED POINT TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK "Q”; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK "Q" BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SANTA GERTRUDES ROAD (NOW INCLUDED IN FIRESTONE BOULEVARD); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK "Q”, WHICH PASSES THROUGH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE LAST MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED JULY 20, 1949 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2446, IN BOOK 30587, PAGE 180, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED JULY 20, 1949 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2445, IN BOOK 30583, PAGE 350, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPT ALL OIL, GAS, MINERALS AND OTHER SUBSTANCES LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND, BUT WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY, AS SURFACE ENTRY, AS RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 24, 1971 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 591, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. APPLICANT MEGDAL DOWNEY LLC C/O THE MEGDAL COMPANIES 252 SOUTH BEVERLY DRIVE, SUITE C BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 t: 213.268.1515 CONTACT: CHRIS HUDDLESTON, cbhuddleston@gmail.com SHEET 10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (COLOR)SHEET 11 LANDSCAPE CONCEPTUAL PLAN ROOF PLAN & SECTIONS SITE FIR E S T O N E B L V D LA K E W O O D B L V D TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAILS N.T.S. SHEET 07 SHEET 12 RENDERING - PERSPECTIVE SHEET 06 PLANT PALETTE SHEET 13 PC AGENDA PAGE 231 WWWWWW W W W W W W W W LAKEWOOD BLVDGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GASWWWWWWWWWWWWGASGASGASGASGASGASFIR E S T O N E B L V D STARBUCKS 1,698 SF 10 8 2 4 . 5 51.34 2 8 . 5 ' (N) R-O-W (N) 1' R-O-WDEDICATION (E) TRAFFICSIGNAL(E) R-O-W ( E ) C U R B , G U T T E R , & S I D E W A L K ( N ) M E N U B O A R D ( N ) P R E - M E N U ( N ) D I R E C T I O N A L S I G N ( N ) C L E A R A N C E B A R (N) DIRECTIONALSIGN ( N ) F U T U R E A C C E S S I B L E E V C S ( N ) A D A P A T H ( N ) T R A S H E N C L O S U R E ( E ) P R O P E R T Y L I N E ( E ) P R O P E R T Y L I N E (E) CURB, GUTTER,& SIDEWALK ( N ) S O L A R P A N E L S , T Y P . (N) HEDGE ( N ) S O L A R P A N E L S , T Y P . ( N ) H E D G E ( N ) S W I T C H G E A R S C R E E N E D , N O R O O F (N) R-O-W ( N ) R A I S E D P E D E S T R I A N C R O S S I N G (N) 2' R-O-WDEDICATION(E) EASEMENT FORPUBLIC ROAD ( E ) S I G N O N A D J A C E N T P R O P E R T Y (E) MONUMENTSIGN, TBD ( E ) S T R E E T L I G H T T O R E M A I N (E) FIRE HYDRANT (E) RETAINING WALLAND RAILING TO BEREMOVED 8' 28.8'EXISTINGCURB CUTTO BE MODIFIED 20' 2 . 5 ' O V E R H A N G 1'26'2'25'2.5'OVERHANG 2 4 . 6 ' E X I S T I N G C U R B C U T T O B E W I D E N E D T O 2 6 ' 8 ' 9 ' 5.5'8.3'12' 3 . 5 ' 1 2 ' 6 ' 2 6 ' ( N ) P A T I O O U T D O O R S E A T I N G A R E A ± 1 0 0 S F 143.35' 1 2 1 . 5 4 ' 1 0 6 . 9 9 ' 72.71'41.54'36.97'8.3'R20'R15'10' 10' 2 5 ' 1 7 . 5 ' 2 0 ' 5 ' R 1 5 ' R10' 17.5'20' 9 ' T Y P 10.1' 9' ( E ) R - O - W ( N ) S O L A R P A N E L S , T Y P . 21.5'49.9'22.3' 15.4' 14' 36.2' ( N ) L I G H T P O L E , T Y P . (N) LIGHT POLE,TYP. 4' 20.8'15.3' ( N ) B I K E R A C K 8 . 5 5.4' 5 ' ( N ) L I G H T P O L E , T Y P . 12' 4.6' ( N ) T R A N S F O R M E R 3.6' 6.4' 4.5' M I N 4 ' 5 . 1 ' 20' ( N ) S P E A K E R P O S T 7 . 8 3 ' 6' 30 Executive Park, Suite 100Irvine, CA 92614t: 949 296 0450 f: 949 296 0479 S I T E P L A N S P - 1 1 S T A R B U C K S F I R E S T O N E B L V D & L A K E W O O D B L V D 2 0 1 9 0 4 2 0 . 0 D O W N E Y , C A 0 5 . 2 0 . 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 5 4 0 S C A L E : 1 " = 1 0 ' - 0 " T R U E N O R T H D R A W I N G I S S U E / R E V I S I O N R E C O R D S I T E D E V . C O O R D I N A T O R D . C O U P E R P R O J E C T I N F O R M A T I O N P R O J E C T N O T E S 1 . T H I S C O N C E P T U A L S I T E P L A N I S F O R P L A N I N G S U B M I T T A L P U R P O S E S O N L Y . 2 . T H I S S I T E P L A N I S B A S E D O N A P D F O F A P A R C E L A S S E S S O R ' S M A P A N D A N A E R I A L . D A T E I N I T I A L S N A R R A T I V E 0 6 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 9 0 6 . 1 8 . 2 0 1 9 0 6 . 1 8 . 2 0 1 9 0 7 . 2 2 . 2 0 1 9 0 9 . 1 0 . 2 0 1 9 0 9 . 2 5 . 2 0 1 9 0 9 . 2 6 . 2 0 1 9 1 0 . 2 4 . 2 0 1 9 0 1 . 0 8 . 2 0 2 0 0 2 . 2 5 . 2 0 2 0 0 3 . 3 1 . 2 0 2 0 0 4 . 0 1 . 2 0 2 0 0 5 . 1 8 . 2 0 2 0 M M M M / I I I I I I B S I I I I I I I I C D / I I J N M M I I P R E P S P - 1 P R E P S P - 2 P R E P S P - 3 P R E P S P - 4 P R E P S P - 5 B A S E D O N A L T A P R E P S P - 6 P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S P R E P S P - 7 P R E P S P - 8 P R E P S P - 9 P R E P S P - 1 0 R E V S P - 1 0 R E V S P - 1 0 P R E P S P - 1 1 G R E E N B E R G F A R R O W C O N T A C T S P A R K I N G S U M M A R Y Z O N I N G C L A S S I F I C A T I O N J U R I S D I C T I O N E X I S T I N G Z O N E C I T Y O F D O W N E Y , C A S P 9 1 - 2 L A K E W O O D / F I R E S T O N E S P E C I F I C P L A N S U B A R E A 5 , S E C T I O N A R E Q U I R E D Z O N E S T A R B U C K S O U T D O O R S E A T I N G ± 1 0 0 S F S T A N D A R D A C C E S S I B L E T O T A L S T A R B U C K S S T A C K I N G N U M B E R * P E R C I T Y O F D O W N E Y L A K E W O O D / F I R E S T O N E S P E C I F I C P L A N 9 1 - 2 , P A R K I N G R E Q U I R E M E N T S F O R R E S T A U R A N T S ( D R I V E - T H R O U G H ) I S 1 S P / 5 0 S F . 1 S P / 5 0 S F * 1 S P / 5 0 S F * 1 6 1 + 1 1 8 9 3 4 * 2 * 3 6 * S P A C E S P R O V I D E D S P A C E S R E Q U I R E D P E R S P R A T I O R E Q U I R E D P E R S P S I T E A R E A N E T S I T E A R E A : R - O - W D E D I C A T I O N : G R O S S S I T E A R E A : T O T A L S I T E C O V E R A G E : ± 0 . 4 0 7 A C ( ± 1 7 , 7 1 9 S F ) ± 0 . 0 0 5 A C ( ± 2 3 0 S F ) ± 0 . 4 1 2 A C ( ± 1 7 , 9 4 9 S F ) ± 9 . 5 8 % ( ± 4 , 1 7 2 S F / A C ) B U I L D I N G A R E A S T A R B U C K S 1 , 6 9 8 S F U S E R S P 9 1 - 2 L A K E W O O D / F I R E S T O N E S P E C I F I C P L A N S U B A R E A 5 , S E C T I O N A 1 7 1 1 8 S P A C E S R E Q U I R E D P E R C O D E 1 S P / 1 0 0 S F 1 S P / 1 0 0 S F R A T I O R E Q U I R E D P E R C O D E P R O J E C T M A N A G E R I . I B R A H I M B E G O V I C P C A G E N D A P A G E 2 3 2 PREPARED BY: COVER 1 OF 3 SHEET BASE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 16453 E. MANNING AVE. REEDLEY, CA 93654 PH:(559) 637-1544 VICINITY MAP TO: STARBUCKS CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, AND ITS AFFILIATES PROGRESSIVE TITLE COMPANY THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2-4, 5, 6(A), 8, 9, 11 13, 14, 16, 17 & 20 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 08/22/2019 DATE OF PLAT OR MAP 08/26/2016 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ NEIL ELLIOTT THONESEN, PLS 8656 DATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8770.6 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA (PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR'S ACT, AS AMENDED JANUARY 1, 2006), THE USE OF THE WORK "CERTIFY" OF "CERTIFICATION" BY A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OR REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER IN THE PRACTICE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING OF LAND SURVEYING OR THE PREPARATION OF MAPS, PLATS, REPORTS, DESCRIPTIONS, OR OTHER SURVEYING DOCUMENTS ONLY CONSTITUTES AN EXPRESSION OF PROFESSIONAL OPINION REGARDING THOSE FACTS OR FINDINGS WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE CERTIFICATION, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT TITLE - LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROGRESSIVE TITLE COMPANY ORDER NO.: PR1880889 TITLE OFFICER: ELLA M. CUMMINGS DATED AS OF MAY 29, 2018 AT 7:30 A.M. THAT PORTION OF BLOCK "Q" OF THE RANCHO SANTA GERTRUDES. IN THE CITY OF DOWNEY, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 502 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EASTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CURVE CONCAVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 18.00 FEET AND A LENGTH OF 29.59 FEET AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED MARCH 4, 1937 IN BOOK 14758, PAGE 280, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE MOST NORTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID DEED AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED JULY 20, 1949 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2446, IN BOOK 30587, PAGE 180, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK "Q” TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK AND WHICH PASSES THROUGH A POINT IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LAKEWOOD BOULEVARD, AS DESCRIBED IN THE FIRST HEREIN MENTIONED DEED, DISTANT SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, 125.00 FEET, FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY TERMINUS OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED CURVE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE LAST MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE THROUGH THE LAST MENTIONED POINT TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK "Q”; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK "Q" BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SANTA GERTRUDES ROAD (NOW INCLUDED IN FIRESTONE BOULEVARD); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK "Q”, WHICH PASSES THROUGH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE LAST MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED JULY 20, 1949 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2446, IN BOOK 30587, PAGE 180, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED JULY 20, 1949 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2445, IN BOOK 30583, PAGE 350, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPT ALL OIL, GAS, MINERALS AND OTHER SUBSTANCES LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND, BUT WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY, AS SURFACE ENTRY, AS RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 24, 1971 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 591, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. TITLE REPORT NOTES RESULT PARCEL INFORMATION OWNER: VERNA K. BORRUD, TRUSTEE OF THE BORRUD TRUST UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 23, 1987 APN: 6284-060-21 ZONING: PARCEL INFORMATION PER CITY OF DOWNEY WEBSITE THE PARCEL IS CURRENTLY ZONED: LAKEWOOD/FIRESTONE (SP 91-2) N.T.S. ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY SITE A. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019, A LIEN NOT YET DUE OR PAYABLE. B. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 TOTAL: $8,756.83 FIRST INSTALLMENT: $4,378.42 PAID PENALTY: $0.00 SECOND INSTALLMENT: $4,378.41 PAID PENALTY: $0.00 ASSESSED VALUATION: LAND VALUE: $246,805.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $172,450.00 EXEMPTION: $0.00 CODE AREA: 03679 A. P. NO.: 6284-006-021 C. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. 1. WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2. AN EASEMENT FOR PURPOSES STATED AND INCIDENTAL RIGHTS. FOR: PUBLIC ROAD AND HIGHWAY RECORDED: IN BOOK 12824, PAGE 236, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS: THE NORTHEASTERLY 15 FEET 3. AN EASEMENT FOR PURPOSES STATED AND INCIDENTAL RIGHTS. FOR: PUBLIC HIGHWAY RECORDED: IN BOOK 14758, PAGE 280, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 4. AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES. RECORDED: IN BOOK 43611, PAGE 380, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 5. AN EASEMENT FOR PURPOSES STATED AND INCIDENTAL RIGHTS. FOR: PUBLIC ROAD AND HIGHWAY RECORDED: JUNE 10, 2004 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 04-1486076, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 6. OUR EXAMINATION OF RECORD TITLE TO THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LAND DOES NOT DISCLOSE ANY EXISTING LOANS. WE THEREFORE REQUIRE THE OWNERS DECLARATION ATTACHED HERETO BE SIGNED, NOTARIZED, AND RETURNED TO US BEFORE RECORDING. 7. ANY DEFECT OR INVALIDITY IN THE TITLE OF THE VESTEES IN THE EVENT SUCH TRUST IS INVALID OR FAILS TO CONFER SUFFICIENT POWERS IN THE TRUSTEES, OR IN THE EVENT THERE IS A LACK OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THE TRUST INSTRUMENTS. 8. RIGHTS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION OF SAID LAND BY REASON OF ANY UNRECORDED LEASES. PLEASE SUBMIT ANY SUCH LEASES TO THIS COMPANY FOR OUR EXAMINATION. 9. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS OR CLAIMS WHICH WOULD BE DISCLOSED BY A CORRECT ALTA/NSPS SURVEY. 10. ANY DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES OR OTHER MATTERS WHICH NAME PARTIES WITH THE SAME OR SIMILAR NAMES AS THE VESTEE(S). 9002 FIRESTONE BOULEVARD, DOWNEY, CA 90241 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED FOR: STARBUCKS CORPORATION REVISIONS: NO. DATE DESC. 08/26/2019 ORIGINAL ISSUE PROJECT INFO: STARBUCKS PROJECT REF. # TOTAL AREA: 0.46 ACRES 19,972 SQ. FT. CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO. 08/26/2019 NET JDK 19102 SCALE: DATE: NOT SURVEY RELATED 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE CENTERLINE OF FIRESTONE BOULEVARD PER PARCEL MAP NO. 25643, FILED IN BOOK 300 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 60-61, LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDS.. TAKEN TO BEAR: NORTH 59°25'31" WEST 2. BASIS OF ELEVATIONS: LA COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. 9671. ELEVATION= 116.996 NAVD88. 3. SITE BENCHMARKS: BASE CONTROL POINT NUMBER 10002. CHISELED CROSS IN CURB. ELEVATION = 113.69', AS SHOWN ON SHEET 2. 4. THIS SURVEY IS VALID ONLY IF THE DRAWING INCLUDES THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE SURVEYOR. 5. CERTIFICATION IS MADE TO THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER OF THE SURVEY, IT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL INSTITUTIONS OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS. 6. SUBSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS WERE NOT EXAMINED OR CONSIDERED AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY. 7. THE LOCATIONS OF UNDER GROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES AND RECORD DRAWINGS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR. LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES/STRUCTURES MAY VARY FROM LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON. NO EXCAVATIONS WERE MADE DURING THE PROCESS OF THIS SURVEY TO LOCATE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES/STRUCTURES. DEPTHS UNKNOWN. 8. EVERY DOCUMENT OF RECORD REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY IS NOTED HEREON. ONLY THE DOCUMENTS NOTED HEREON WERE SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR. THERE MAY EXIST OTHER DOCUMENTS OF RECORD WHICH WOULD AFFECT THIS PARCEL. 9. SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN ZONE "X SHADED", AREAS WITHIN ZONE "X SHADED" ARE DETERMINED TO BE AREAS OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD; AREAS OF 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD WITH AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 1 FOOT OR WITH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN 1 SQUARE MILE; AND AREAS PROTECTED BY LEVEES FROM 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD, AS DETERMINED BY THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. MAP NUMBER: 06037C1840F EFFECTIVE DATE: 09/26/2008 10. DURING THE COURSE OF THE FIELD SURVEY THERE WAS NO OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF EARTH MOVING WORK. 11. DURING THE COURSE OF THE FIELD SURVEY THERE WAS NO OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OR BUILDING ADDITIONS WITHIN RECENT MONTHS. 12. DURING THE COURSE OF THE ALTA SURVEY THERE HAVE BEEN NO CHANGES IN THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY LINES. NO CHANGES TO STREET RIGHT OF WAY WERE MADE AWARE TO THE SURVEYOR. 13. DURING THE COURSE OF THE FIELD SURVEY THERE WAS NO OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF SITE USE AS A SOLID WASTE DUMP, SUMP OR SANITARY LANDFILL. 14. DURING THE COURSE OF THE FIELD SURVEY THERE WAS NO OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF A WETLANDS FIELD DELINEATION. NOTES SANITARY SEWER - CITY OF DOWNEY - APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS PER OBSERVED EVIDENCE STORM SEWER - CITY OF DOWNEY - APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS PER OBSERVED EVIDENCE WATER - CITY OF DOWNEY - APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS PER OBSERVED EVIDENCE GAS - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS - APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS PER OBSERVED EVIDENCE ELECTRIC - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS PER OBSERVED EVIDENCE UTILITIES 19 STEWART AND GRAY ROAD WO O D R U F F AV E N U E FI R E S T O N E B O U L E V A R D BR O O K S H I R E AV E N U E NOT SURVEY RELATED NOT SURVEY RELATED NONE MADE AWARE SURVEYOR DOES AFFECT AS SHOWN HEREON DOES AFFECT AS SHOWN HEREON MAY AFFECT DOES AFFECT AS SHOWN HEREON NONE MADE AWARE SURVEYOR NONE MADE AWARE SURVEYOR NONE MADE AWARE SURVEYOR ALTA SURVEY AS SHOWN HEREON NONE MADE AWARE SURVEYOR LEGEND CONTROL - BRASS CAP CONTROL - CHISELED CROSS CONTROL - NAIL FOUND CONTROL - REBAR FOUND CONTROL - TAG DOME ELECTRIC - BOX ELECTRIC - RISER ELECTRIC - VAULT FIRE HYDRANT GAS - METER GAS - RISER IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE LIGHT POLE LIGHT POLE - 2 LIGHTS LIGHT POLE - 3 LIGHTS ROOF DRAIN RD SIGN STORM DRAIN - GRATE STORM DRAIN - VAULT STRIPING - ARROW LEFT STRIPING - ARROW RIGHT STRIPING - HANDICAP TELEPHONE - BOX TRAFFIC SIGNAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL - BOX TRAFFIC SIGNAL - SHORT TREE - DECIDUOUS WATER - BOX WATER - RISER WATER - VALVE WHEEL STOP W WOOD FENCE SEWER LINE - UNDERGROUND WATER LINE - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE - OVERHEAD TELEPHONE LINE - UNDERGROUND METAL FENCE WIRE FENCE CHAIN LINK FENCE ELEC. & TELE. LINE - OVERHEAD AC BLD CNC CR EG EP FL FM FW FWD GB IE LIP SS ST STB STD SW TBC TOP BACK OF CURB SIDEWALK STRIPING - DOUBLE STRIPING - BROKEN STRIPING SANITARY SEWER LIP OF CURB INVERT ELEVATION GRADE BREAK FENCE - WOOD FENCE - WIRE FENCE - METAL FLOW LINE EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING GRADE CROWN OF ROAD CONCRETE BUILDING LINE ASPHALT CONCRETE FF FINISHED FLOOR FFD FINISHED FLOOR DOUBLE DW DRIVEWAY STORM LINE - UNDERGROUND UNKNOWN LINE - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE - OVERHEAD GAS LINE - UNDERGROUND FLP FLOW LINE PIPE PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE FEMA BOUNDARY LINE BUILDING OUTLINE CABLE LINE ROAD CENTERLINE GRADE BREAK TFC TOP FACE OF CURB ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE SECTION LINE PC AGENDA PAGE 233 RD R D FIRESTONE BOULEVARD LA K E W O O D B O U L E V A R D BLOCK WALL HEIGHT 2' BLOCK WALL HEIGHT 2' BUILDING HEIGHT: 20' DRIVE ENTRANCE DR I V E E N T R A N C E 8" VCP SEWER LINE FILLED WITH DIRT FILLED WITH DIRT W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 11 5 ' 11 5 ' 115' 115' 114' 115' 1 1 4 ' 11 3 ' 11 3 ' 11 3 ' 11 3 ' 1 1 4 ' 1 1 5 ' 1 1 3 ' 11 5 ' 115' 114 ' 114' 114' 115' 114'114' 114' 114' 114'114' 114' 114' 11 3 ' 11 4 ' 1 1 4 ' 11 4 ' 11 4 ' 11 4 ' 11 4 ' 11 3 ' 114 ' 1 1 4 ' 113'113' 1 1 5 ' 11 5 ' 11 6 ' 11 6 ' W W W W W W W W W W W W W RIM = 114.12' FL (N) 18" = 99.14' FL (S) 18" = 99.11' MONUMENT SIGN MONUMENT SIGN PREPARED BY: TOPO 2 OF 3 SHEET BASE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 16453 E. MANNING AVE. REEDLEY, CA 93654 PH:(559) 637-1544 9002 FIRESTONE BOULEVARD, DOWNEY, CA 90241 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED FOR: STARBUCKS CORPORATION REVISIONS: NO. DATE DESC. 08/26/2019 ORIGINAL ISSUE PROJECT INFO: STARBUCKS PROJECT REF. # TOTAL AREA: 0.46 ACRES 19,972 SQ. FT. CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO. 08/26/2019 NET JDK 19102 SCALE: DATE: SCALE: 1" = 10' Feet 0 10 20 1" = 10' PC AGENDA PAGE 234 FOUND NAIL AND WASHER "LS 6771" PER R2 AND P.W.F.B. NO. 0825, PAGE 901 FOUND REBAR, DOWN 8", NO CAP NOT OF RECORD DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PER BK. 14758, PG. 280 O.R. TITLE ITEM NO. 3 NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT Q DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PER BK. 12824, PG. 236 O.R. TITLE ITEM NO. 2 DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PER INST NO. 2446 IN BK. 30587, PG. 180 O.R. EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD PER PUBLIC ROAD AND HIGHWAY REC. JUNE 10, 2004 AS INST. NO. 04-1486076, O.R. TITLE ITEM NO. 5 SUBJECT PARCEL 0.41 ACRES NET 0.46 ACRES GROSS APN: 6284-060-21 APN: 6284-060-23 NOT A PART LA K E W O O D B O U L V E V A R D FI R E S T O N E B O U L V E V A R D Δ =4 °3 7 '1 4 " (M ) R =1 5 5 0 .0 0 ' (M ) L =1 2 5 .0 0 ' (M ) Δ =9 4 °1 0 '5 0 "(M ) R =1 8 .0 0 '(M ) L =2 9 .5 9 '(M ) S5 8 ° 5 7 ' 1 4 " E 1 0 6 . 9 9 ' ( M ) S3 1 ° 3 0 ' 2 0 " W 1 4 3 . 3 5 ' ( M ) N5 9 ° 2 5 ' 3 1 " W 1 3 6 . 5 4 ' ( M ) FOUND NAIL AND WASHER "LS 6771" PER P.W.F.B. NO. 0825, PAGE 762 S5 9 ° 2 5 ' 3 1 " E 2 1 8 9 . 5 9 ' ( M ) B A S I S O F B E A R I N G S FOUND COTTON SPINDLE AND WASHER "LS 8294" PER PUBLIC WORKS FIELD BOOK NO. 0825, PAGE 905 FOUND AND ACCEPTED MONUMENT AS NOTED (M) MEASURED (R1) RECORD AND CALCULATED DIMENSIONS PER PARCEL MAP NO. 25643, RECORDED IN BOOK 300 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 60-61, LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDS. (R2) RECORD AND CALCULATED DIMENSIONS PER PARCEL MAP NO. 68959, FILED IN BOOK 360, AT PAGES 24-25, LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDS. PREPARED BY: BOUNDARY 3 OF 3 SHEET BASE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 16453 E. MANNING AVE. REEDLEY, CA 93654 PH:(559) 637-1544 SCALE: 1" = 20' 9002 FIRESTONE BOULEVARD, DOWNEY, CA 90241 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED FOR: STARBUCKS CORPORATION REVISIONS: NO. DATE DESC. 08/26/2019 ORIGINAL ISSUE PROJECT INFO: STARBUCKS PROJECT REF. # TOTAL AREA: 0.46 ACRES 19,972 SQ. FT. CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO. 08/26/2019 NET JDK 19102 SCALE: DATE: Feet 0 20 40 LEGEND 1" = 20' PC AGENDA PAGE 235 RD RDBUILDING HEIGHT: 20'WWWWWWW W W W W W Δ =4 °3 7 '14 "(M )R =15 5 0 .0 0 '(M )L =12 5 .0 0 '(M )Δ=94°10'50"(M)R=18.00'(M)L=29.59'(M) S 5 8 ° 5 7 ' 1 4 " E 1 0 6 . 9 9 ' ( M ) S31°30'20"W 143.35' (M) N59°25'31"W 136.54' (M ) FIRESTO N E B L V D LAKEWOOD BLVD30 Executive Park, Suite 100Irvine, CA 92614t: 949 296 0450 f: 949 296 0479 C O N C E P T U A L D E M O L I T I O N P L A N C D - 1 S T A R B U C K S F I R E S T O N E B L V D & L A K E W O O D B L V D 2 0 1 9 0 4 2 0 . 0 D O W N E Y , C A 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 1 9 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 5 4 0 S C A L E : 1 " = 1 0 ' - 0 " T R U E N O R T H D E M O L I T I O N K E Y N O T E S L E G E N D : P C A G E N D A P A G E 2 3 6 WWWWWWW W W W 10 8 STARBUCKS±2,000 SFLAKEWOOD BLVD FIRESTONE BLVD A L I G N T R E E S W I T H S T R I P E , T Y P . 30 Executive Park, Suite 100Irvine, CA 92614t: 949 296 0450 f: 949 296 0479 L A N D S C A P E C O N C E P T U A L P L A N L C P - 1 S T A R B U C K S F I R E S T O N E B L V D & L A K E W O O D B L V D 2 0 1 9 0 4 2 0 . 0 D O W N E Y , C A 1 0 . 2 9 . 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 5 4 0 S C A L E : 1 " = 1 0 ' - 0 " T R U E N O R T H D R A W I N G I S S U E / R E V I S I O N R E C O R D S I T E D E V . C O O R D I N A T O R D . C O U P E R P R O J E C T I N F O R M A T I O N P R O J E C T N O T E S 1 . T H I S C O N C E P T U A L S I T E P L A N I S F O R P L A N I N G S U B M I T T A L P U R P O S E S O N L Y . 2 . T H I S S I T E P L A N I S B A S E D O N A P D F O F A P A R C E L A S S E S S O R ' S M A P A N D A N A E R I A L . D A T E I N I T I A L S N A R R A T I V E G R E E N B E R G F A R R O W C O N T A C T S L A N D S C A P E S U M M A R Y Z O N I N G C L A S S I F I C A T I O N J U R I S D I C T I O N E X I S T I N G Z O N E C I T Y O F D O W N E Y , C A S P 9 1 - 2 L A K E W O O D / F I R E S T O N E S P E C I F I C P L A N S U B A R E A 5 , S E C T I O N A R E Q U I R E D Z O N E S I T E A R E A N E T S I T E A R E A : R - O - W D E D I C A T I O N : G R O S S S I T E A R E A : T O T A L S I T E C O V E R A G E : ± 0 . 4 0 7 A C ( ± 1 7 , 7 1 9 S F ) ± 0 . 0 0 5 A C ( ± 2 3 0 S F ) ± 0 . 4 1 2 A C ( ± 1 7 , 9 4 9 S F ) ± 1 2 . 4 1 % ( ± 4 , 9 1 4 S F / A C ) B U I L D I N G A R E A S T A R B U C K S ± 2 , 0 0 0 S F S P 9 1 - 2 L A K E W O O D / F I R E S T O N E S P E C I F I C P L A N S U B A R E A 5 , S E C T I O N A L A N D S C A P E R E Q U I R E M E N T S : T O T A L L A N D S C A P E A R E A : 2 , 8 9 0 S Q . F T . T O T A L S I T E A R E A : 1 7 , 7 1 9 S Q . F T . P E R C E N T A G E O F L A N D S C A P I N G : 2 , 8 9 0 S Q . F T . / 1 7 , 7 1 9 S Q . F T . = 1 6 . 3 % - O N E ( 1 ) T R E E F O R E V E R Y ( 5 ) P A R K I N G S P A C E S , A N D - O N E ( 1 ) T R E E F O R E V E R Y T W E N T Y ( 2 0 ) L I N E A R F E E T O F S T R E E T ( I N C L U D I N G S T R E E T S I D E ) F R O N T A G E - T W E N T Y P E R C E N T ( 2 0 % ) O F A L L T R E E S : 2 4 - I N C H B O X M I N . - E I G H T Y P E R C E N T ( 8 0 % ) O F A L L T R E E S : 1 5 - G A L L O N M I N . T O T A L T R E E C A L C U L A T I O N : 2 5 9 ' - 6 " - 5 7 ' ( c u r b a n d w a l k w a y ) = 2 0 2 ' 2 0 1 L I N E A R F T . / O N E ( 1 ) T R E E E V E R Y 2 0 L I N E A R F T . O F S T R E E T F R O N T A G E = 1 0 T R E E S 1 8 P A R K I N G S P A C E S / 5 = 4 T R E E S T O T A L N U M B E R O F T R E E S R E Q U I R E D = 1 4 T O T A L N U M B E R O F T R E E S P R O V I D E D = 1 4 N O T E S : A L L L A N D S C A P E A R E A S S H A L L B E W A T E R E D B Y A N A U T O M A T I C I R R I G A T I O N S Y S T E M ; W I T H B U B B L E R S A N D D R I P . A L L L A N D S C A P E I N S T A L L A T I O N S H A L L B E P E R M A N E N T L Y M A I N T A I N E D . A L A N D S C A P E D O C U M E N T P A C K A G E A S P E R A . B . 1 8 8 1 S H A L L B E P R O V I D E D . P L A N T M A T E R I A L N O T L I S T E D M A Y B E U S E D , S U B J E C T T O A P P R O V A L O F T H E C I T Y . A L L L A N D S C A P E P L A N S A N D I N S T A L L A T I O N S H A L L A D H E R E T O C I T Y D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S , C O D E S A N D R E G U L A T I O N S . W H E R E T R E E S A R E W I T H I N 5 F E E T O F W A L K W A Y S A N D / O R P A V I N G S U R F A C E S , R O O T B A R R I E R S S H A L L B E I N S T A L L E D . O N - S I T E A N D P A R K W A Y L A N D S C A P E S H A L L B E M A I N T A I N E D B Y B U S I N E S S O W N E R S . 0 6 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 9 0 6 . 1 8 . 2 0 1 9 0 6 . 1 8 . 2 0 1 9 0 7 . 2 2 . 2 0 1 9 0 9 . 1 0 . 2 0 1 9 0 9 . 2 5 . 2 0 1 9 0 9 . 2 6 . 2 0 1 9 1 0 . 2 4 . 2 0 1 9 1 0 . 2 8 . 2 0 1 9 1 0 . 2 9 . 2 0 1 9 M M M M / I I I I I I B S I I I I I I M M M M P R E P S P - 1 P R E P S P - 2 P R E P S P - 3 P R E P S P - 4 P R E P S P - 5 B A S E D O N A L T A P R E P S P - 6 P E R C I T Y C O M M E N T S P R E P S P - 7 P R E P S P - 8 P R E P S P - 8 L I G H T I N G P R E P S P - 8 L I G H T P O L E , G R E E N S C R E E N P C A G E N D A P A G E 2 3 7 30 Executive Park, Suite 100Irvine, CA 92614t: 949 296 0450 f: 949 296 0479 P L A N T I N G P A L E T T E L C P - 2 S T A R B U C K S F I R E S T O N E B L V D & L A K E W O O D B L V D 2 0 1 9 0 4 2 0 . 0 D O W N E Y , C A 1 0 . 2 9 . 2 0 2 0 TREESLagerstroemia x 'Natchez'White Crape Myrtle L i r i o d e n d r o n t u l i p f e r a ' E m e r a l d C i t y ' E m e r a l d C i t y T u l i p T r e e SHRUBSBuxus sempervirens'Green Tower'Green Tower Boxwood Hesperaloe parviflora'Brakelights'Red Yucca Myrtus c o m m u n i s ' C o m p a c t a ' Dwarf M y r t l e W e s t r i n g i a f r u t i c o s a ' B l u e G e m ' B l u e G e m W e s t r i n g i a W e s t r i n g i a f r u t i c o s a ' G r e y B o x ' G r e y B o x W e s t r i n g i a GROUND C O V E R Lantana c a m a r a ' R a i n b o w ' T M Rainbow L a n t a n a G R A S S F e s t u c a i d a h o e n s i s ' S i s k i y o u B l u e ' S i s k i y o u B l u e F e s c u e M u h l e n b e r g i a r i g e n s D e e r G r a s s V I N E T r a c h e l o s p e r m u m j a s m i n o i d e s ' S t a r ' S t a r J a s m i n e F a r g e s i a r o b u s t a ' P i n g W u ' G r e e n S c r e e n B a m b o o Lagerstroemia x 'Muskogee'Lavender Crape Myrtle S o p h o r a s e c u n d i f l o r a T e x a s M o u n t a i n L a u r e l Agave americanaCentury Plant P C A G E N D A P A G E 2 3 8 LA K E W O O D B L V D FIRESTONE BLVD ST A R B U C K S 1, 6 9 8 S F ST A R B U C K S 1, 6 9 8 S F A A A 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.8 2.5 2.7 1.9 1.7 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.5 2.1 2.5 1.7 1.1 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.3 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.1 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.2 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.1 1.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 3.2 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.0 1.4 1.9 1.5 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.8 1.4 1.2 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 2.4 2.3 1.5 1.3 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.1 1.5 2.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30 Executive Park, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614 t: 949 296 0450 f: 949 296 0479 LIGHTING PLAN STARBUCKS FIRESTONE BLVD & LAKEWOOD BLVD 2019020.0 DOWNEY, CA 07.06.2020 0 20 30105 40 SCALE: 1"=10'-0" NOTES: 10/25/19 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES REF. DRWGS. DRAWING NUMBER NEXT ASSEMBLY MW FINISH MATERIAL DRAWN BY PROJECT NO. APPROVED BY APPROVED BY APPROVED BY SHOP ORDER CHECKED BY POINT-BY-POINT FOOTCANDLE PLOT FOR STARBUCKS NOTES: FIRESTONE BLVD & LAKEWOOD BLVD DOWNEY, CA 1" = 10' 0" SCALE DATE SECURITY L I G H T I N G TM 1. THE FOOTCANDLE LEVELS AS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA. ANY SUBSTITUTIONS IN SPECIFIED FIXTURES OR CHANGES TO LAYOUT WILL AFFECT LIGHTING LEVELS SHOWN AND WILL NOT BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF SECURITY LIGHTING. 2. DISTANCE BETWEEN READINGS 10' CONCEPTUALHEIGHT 17' MOUNTING ** - SPECIFY COLOR POLE TYPE: SES-15-40-1-TA-** (4") SYMBOLFIXTURE TYPE:QUANTITY 3 QUANTITYCONFIG SGL 33 EPAFIXTURE QUANTITY 14.290mph WIND LOAD EPA ALLOWEDLLF 0.90.67TTFVIPER QUANTITYTENON TOP FITTERS * PROJECT WIND LOAD CRITERIA BASED ON: ASCE 7-10 WIND SPEEDS (3-SEC PEAK GUST MPH) 50 YEAR MEAN RECURRENCE INTERVAL 3 1. THIS LIGHTING DESIGN IS BASED ON INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY OTHERS TO SECURITY LIGHTING SYSTEMS. SITE DETAILS PROVIDED HEREON ARE REPRODUCED ONLY AS A VISUALIZATION AID. FIELD DEVIATIONS MAY SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT PREDICTED PERFORMANCE. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, CRITICAL SITE INFORMATION (POLE LOCATIONS, ORIENTATION, MOUNTING HEIGHT, ETC.) SHOULD BE COORDINATED WITH THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SPECIFIER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROJECT. 2. LUMINAIRE DATA IS TESTED TO INDUSTRY STANDARDS UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS. OPERATING VOLTAGE AND NORMAL MANUFACTURING TOLERANCES OF LAMP, BALLAST, AND LUMINAIRE MAY AFFECT FIELD RESULTS. 3. CONFORMANCE TO FACILITY CODE AND OTHER LOCAL REQUIREMENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 4. THIS LAYOUT MAY NOT MEET TITLE 24 OR LOCAL ENERGY REQUIREMENTS. IF THIS LAYOUT NEEDS TO E COMPLIANT WITH TITLE 24 OR OTHER ENERGY REQUIREMENTS, PLEASE CONSULT FACTORY WITH SPECIFIC DETAILS REGARDING PROJECT REQUIREMENTS SO THAT REVISIONS MAY BE MADE TO THE DRAWING. VP-S-24L-55-4K7-4-UNV-SCP-PCR-TL-A-**-HSS-90-FB N.A. UNITSCALCTYPE ILLUMINANCE FCPAVED SURFACE READINGS MINLABEL 0.00.78 MAX 3.2 CALCULATION SUMMARY AVG AVG/MIN MAX/MIN N.A. N.A.ILLUMINANCE FCPROPERTY LINE READINGS 0.00.00 0.0 N.A. TRUE NORTH PC AGENDA PAGE 239 CAFE SEATING BACKBAR WORKROOM RR RR OUTDOOR SEATING 5' 3'-9" 3'4' - 3 " 5' - 1 " 5' 8' 5'-4"5' 8' 3' - 5 " 3'-7"3'-10" 3'-8" 3'-1" 3' - 1 1 " 3'-1" 3' - 8 " 3' - 8 " 4' - 1 " 4'-4" 16 ' - 6 " 22'-6" DRIVE-THRU WINDOW UTILITY CABINET 14'-11"8'-3"14'-8" 4' - 6 " 3' 3' 13 ' - 8 " 1' - 2 " 56'-4" 28 ' - 1 0 " 10'-2"6'7'-2" 56'-4" 1' - 2 " 3' - 6 " 3' - 6 " 17 ' - 1 0 " 33 ' - 8 " 3' - 6 " 3' 1'8'-3"19'-1" 1' 7'-8"1'-2"9'-8" 7' 1' - 5 " 6' 3" FLOOR PLAN 06.17.2020 STARBUCKS 20190420.0 STARBUCKS FIRESTONE BLVD & LAKEWOOD BLVD DOWNEY, CA 30 Executive Park, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614 t: 949 296 0450 f: 949 296 0479 SCALE: PC AGENDA PAGE 240 FINISH FLOOR 0" B.O. FASCIA 12' - 3" T.O. FASCIA 14' - 0" WORKROOM B.O. DRIVE THRU WINDOW 2'-10" T.O. ROOF SCREEN 19' - 6" T.O. TOWER 21' - 0" MECHANICAL UNITS SOLAR PANELS ROOF SCREENING ROOF SCREENING 1 - 2 - SOLAR PANELS MECHANICAL UNITS ROOF SCREENING ROOF SCREENING ROOF SCREENING OPEN TO BELOW FINISH FLOOR 0" B.O. FASCIA 12' - 3" T.O. FASCIA 14' - 0" WORKROOMBACKBARCAFE SEATING T.O. ROOF SCREEN 19' - 6" T.O. TOWER 21' - 0" SOLAR PANELS MECHANICAL UNITROOF SCREENING ROOF SCREENING BUILDING SECTIONS SCALE: AS NOTED 06.17.20 Scale:1/4"= 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION Scale:1/4"= 1'-0"1 LONGITUDINAL SECTION KEY PLAN STARBUCKS FIRESTONE BLVD & LAKEWOOD BLVD DOWNEY, CA 201904200 30 Executive Park, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614 t: 949 296 0450 f: 949 296 0479 PC AGENDA PAGE 241 FINISH FLOOR 0" T.O. ROOF SCREEN 19' - 6" T.O. FASCIA 14' - 0" B.O. FASCIA 12' - 3" T.O. TOWER 21' - 0" B.O. STOREFRONT 3'-0" 1 A 1 A 2 B 3 C 8-9-14 C 14 C 9- 4 E 5 D 12 C 1 A 2 B 10 C 3 C 11 D 0" FINISH FLOOR 0" T.O. FASCIA 14' - 0" B.O. FASCIA 12' - 3" 2'-10" B.O. DRIVE THRU WINDOW T.O. ROOF SCREEN 19' - 6" T.O. TOWER 21' - 0" 3 C 2 B 14 C 8-13 B 2 B 5 D 1 A 5 D 1 A 12 C 4 E 4 E 2 B 2 B 3 C 11 D 11 D FINISH FLOOR 0" T.O. FASCIA 14' - 0" B.O. FASCIA 12' - 3" T.O. ROOF SCREEN 19' - 6" T.O. TOWER 21' - 0" 7 B 7 C 3 C 3 C 8-1 A 9-14 C 2 B 14 C 1 C 10 C 11 D FINISH FLOOR 0" T.O. FASCIA 14' - 0" B.O. FASCIA 12' - 3" 2'-10" B.O. DRIVE THRU WINDOW T.O. ROOF SCREEN 19' - 6" T.O. TOWER 21' - 0" 3 C 12 C 1 A 9-5 D 6 D 1 A 9-14 C 2 B 14 C 2 B 14 C 8- 4 E 10 C 1 A 3 C 11 D 15- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 07.2.20 FINISH SCHEDULE 1 3 2 FINISH MATERIAL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM SIGNAGE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME 7 4 5 6 6" CONCRETE CURB 9 10 11 DRIVE-THRU WINDOW 8 CEMENT PLASTER W/INTEGRAL COLOR . TEXTURE - SAND CEMENT PLASTER CONTROL JOINT CANOPY 4'X8' PARKLEX PANELS, CUT TO MATCH CONTROL JOINTS FASCIA: PAINTED WOOD CABLED SCREEN RAILING WITH VINES 1 EAST ELEVATION 3 WEST ELEVATION 4 SOUTH ELEVATION 2 NORTH ELEVATION STARBUCKS FIRESTONE BLVD & LAKEWOOD BLVD DOWNEY, CA 201904200 30 Executive Park, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614 t: 949 296 0450 f: 949 296 0479 Note: Colors shown on these elevations are for illustration purposes only. For actual colors, refer to manufacturer's samples. A FINISH COLOR B FINISH TO MATCH - SW7047: PORPOISE PARKLEX: COOPER C D FINISH TO MATCH - SW7020: BLACK FOX E ANODIZED - BLACK RAL7021 F NOT USED 12 13 COLUMNS TUBE SHEET FRAMED GATE WITH PARKLEX PANELS G NOT USED 14 PREFINISHED METAL CORNICE FINISH TO MATCH - DAVIS COLOR: GRAPHITE SCALE: 15 ART (DID:16918): WHITE PAINT STENCIL ON INTEGRAL COLOR STUCCO W/SEALER OVER PC AGENDA PAGE 242 PC AGENDA PAGE 243 PC AGENDA PAGE 244 PERSPECTIVE 07.6.20 STARBUCKS FIRESTONE BLVD & LAKEWOOD BLVD DOWNEY, CA 201904200 30 Executive Park, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614 t: 949 296 0450 f: 949 296 0479 PC AGENDA PAGE 245 COLOR & MATERIAL BOARD 06/17/2020 STARBUCKS FIRESTONE BLVD & LAKEWOOD BLVD DOWNEY, CA 201904200 30 Executive Park, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614 t: 949 296 0450 f: 949 296 0479 PC AGENDA PAGE 246