Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Reso 10-2664RESOLUTION NO. 10-2664 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE DOWNTOWN DOWNEY SPECIFIC PLAN THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Downey hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. On October 24, 2000, the City of Downey adopted the "Downtown Plan for Downey's Historical Downtown District" (hereinafter referred to Downtown Overlay Zone). The Downtown Plan placed an overlay onto the existing downtown area to regulate uses, signs, and parking; and, B. On June 9, 2009, the Community Development Commission approved a contract with Hogle Ireland to analyze the downtown area and prepare a new Specific Plan for Downtown Downey; and, C. As a result of the CDC action, staff and the City's consultant began a public outreach campaign to determine the community's concerns and visions for the downtown. This campaign includes stakeholder interviews in October 2009, a community outreach, meeting on December 3, 2009, EIR scoping meeting on May 26, 2010, and presentation to the Downtown Project Area Committee on June 1, 2010. The feedback from these meetings was used to craft the goals and objectives for the Downtown Specific Plan; and, D. The City of Downey has prepared a specific plan, which is titled the Downtown Downey Specific Plan (the "Downtown Specific Plan") to guide the development of 131 acres in downtown Downey. The 131 -acre Project Site (including street rights- of-way) is located in the southeast portion of the community and is generally bounded by various street segments that stretch from Paramount Boulevard to Brookshire Avenue and include sections of 4th 5th and 7th Streets on the north; the easterly side of Paramount Boulevard on the west; the westerly side of Brookshire Avenue on the east; and the Union Pacific railway line on the south; and, E. The Downtown Specific Plan addresses the planning and development of the 131 - acre downtown area, the area's permitted and conditionally permitted uses, as well as advancing urban design standards and guidelines; and, F. On June 28, 2010, the staff released a public draft of the proposed Downtown Downey Specific Plan. This was followed by a joint City Council/Planning Commission workshop on the draft plan that was conducted on July 6, 2010; and, G. On July 15, 2010, pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), staff issued a Notice of Availability for the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), which began the official 45 -day comment period on the DEIR; and, Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission H. On September 3, 2010, notice of the public hearing was mailed to all property owners and business owners within the boundaries of the Downtown Downey Specific Plan, to all property owners within 500' of the boundaries of the Downtown Downey Specific Plan, and published in the Long Beach Press -Telegram; and, i. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on September 15, 2010 and after fully considering all oral and written testimony and facts and opinions offered at the aforesaid public hearing adopted this resolution. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission further finds, determines and declares that a Draft EIR has been prepared for the Downtown Downey Specific Plan in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, CEQA Guidelines and the City of Downey's Revised Procedures for Implementing CEQA. On September 15, 2010, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 10-2662, recommending the City Council of the City of Downey adopt the Draft EIR SECTION 3. The Planning Commission of the City of Downey further finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed location of the development and proposed conditions under which it will be operated or maintained is consistent with the goals and polices embodied in the General Plan and other applicable plans and policies adopted by the Council. The boundaries of the Specific Plan are within the General Plan Land Use Designation of Mixed Use. In accordance with the "Mixed Use" category, coupled with the direction provided by the 2005 General Plan Update, the Downtown Specific Plan was prepared to implement the policies, which reflect the "Mixed Use" category and to implement policies related to downtown Downey. Furthermore, Appendix A of the Specific Plan (incorporated herein by reference) denotes 42 individual goals and policies of the General Plan that the Specific Plan is consistent with. B. The proposed development is in accordance with the purposes and objectives of Article IX and the zone in which the site is located. Article IX of the Downey Municipal Code includes a Mixed Use zone. Likewise the proposed Downtown Downey Specific Plan is designed to implement a mixed use environment. The intent of the Mixed Use zone is 1) encourage mixed-use buildings with retail, office, service, and/or other uses on the ground floor and residential units above the nonresidential space; 2) encourage development that exhibits the physical design characteristics of pedestrian -oriented, storefront -style shopping streets that creates a more active and vibrant street life; 3) strengthen the City's economic base, and provide employment opportunities close to home for residents of the City; and 4) promote the health and welfare of City residents by encouraging physical activity, reducing vehicular traffic, encouraging alternative transportation where possible, and promoting greater social interaction. The Downtown Downey Specific Plan incorporates development standards that will enforce the intent of the Mixed Use zone. C. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of persons residing or working in or adjacent to such a development, nor detrimental to properties or improvements in the vicinity or the general welfare of the City. The Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 2 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Downtown Specific Plan is necessary and desirable for the development of the community and will systematically execute the objectives of the General Plan and is in the interest of and furthers the public health, safety, general welfare, and the goals, policies, and programs of the General Plan relating to advancing livable community concepts and focusing on areas in which livable communities concepts could have the most impact. Furthermore, the Specific Plan will allow people to live and work in the same area, as well as, allow visitors to park once and walk to multiple destinations. The mixed use environment will promote the public health, safety, and welfare since it will promote people to walk between destinations or between their home and work. D. The Specific Plan and resulting development will be consistent with the provisions of Article 8 of Chapter 3 of the California Government Code, commencing with Section 65450 as may be subsequently amended by the State. Article 8 of Chapter 3 of the California Government Code sets forth specific requirements and standards for the content and adoption of Specific Plans. This includes that the Specific Plan is consistent with the City's General Plan. As noted in the first finding of this section, the proposed Downtown Downey Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan. Furthermore, according the to the Government Code, the Specific Plan shall contain text and diagrams for the area covered by the specific plan, all of the public improvements (roadways, sewers, water mains, etc) within the specific plan, and necessary programs to implement the specific plan. The proposed Downtown Downey Specific Plan contains all of these requirements. E. The Downtown Downey Specific Plan is necessary and desirable for the development of the community and will systematically execute the objectives of the General Plan and is in the interest of and furthers the public health, safety, general welfare, and the goals, policies, and programs of the General Plan relating to advancing livable community concepts and focusing on areas in which livable communities concepts could have the most impact. As a consequence, and because of changing economic and development conditions, as well as the importance of Downey's downtown to the community's economic health and vitality and in the interest of the community and its general welfare, the City changed the Project Site's land use category to the "Mixed Use" classification. In accordance with the "Mixed Use" category, coupled with the direction provided by the 2005 General Plan Update, the Downtown Specific Plan was prepared to implement the policies that reflect the "Mixed Use" category and to implement policies related to downtown Downey. F. The Downtown Specific Plan will be compatible with and complementary to existing conditions and adjoining properties, since development standards have been incorporated into the specific plan to safeguard neighboring properties. Additionally, mitigation measures are being recommended as part of the Final EIR that will lessen the impacts that were identified in the Final EIR for the Downtown Specific Plan G. The Downtown Specific Plan has identified the permitted and conditionally permitted uses that can be established in the planning area and the appropriate urban design standards and guidelines for those uses. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 3 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission that: H. The 131 -acre planning area and its roadway network properly relate to the streets and highways designed and fully improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic that is expected to be generated in the area and utilities exist or are planned which will adequately serve the area described in the Downtown Specific Plan, since it has examined and has established requirements to ensure that all improvements relating to streets, highways and utilities will be accomplished to the satisfaction of the City. The entitlement process that accompanied the preparation of the Downtown Specific Plan also expanded the "Mixed Use" General Plan category so it encompasses the entire 131 -acre planning area, as well as changing all existing zoning in the planning area to the Downtown Specific Plan in order to provide consistent zoning throughout the downtown, respond to current economic conditions and establish land uses that allow for the flexibility needed to achieve the City's goals for livable communities. J. The Downtown Specific Plan conforms to the General Plan because, as part of the Project, the General Plan will be amended to adopt the "Mixed Use" land use category for the entire Project Site. SECTION 4. The Planning Commission also further finds, determines and declares A. The Draft EIR has been prepared for the Downtown Specific Plan in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, CEQA Guidelines and the City of Downey's Revised Procedures for Implementing CEQA. Prior to recommending approval of the Downtown Specific Plan, the Planning Commission independently considered the Notice of Preparation and Draft EIR, all submitted comments received during the environmental document's public review period, the public hearing, and responses to comments. Based on the Notice of Preparation, Environmental Impact Report, submitted comments and responses, the Planning Commission finds, determines and declares that although implementing the Downtown Specific Plan may result in unavoidable adverse impacts on air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and transportation/traffic, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council make the finding, according to Subsection (c) of Public Resources Code Section 21081, that specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. B. The Planning Commission makes the findings contained in the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit 'A" with respect to significant environmental impacts identified in the EIR, together with the finding that each fact in support of the findings is true and is based upon substantial evidence in the record, including the EIR. C. The Draft EIR has identified all significant environmental effects that will result from implementing the Downtown Specific Plan and all significant effects are set forth in the Findings of Fact. D. The Findings of Fact and the EIR have identified that if the Downtown Specific Plan is approved and implemented, it may have an unavoidable adverse effect on air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and transportation/traffic. However, all Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 4 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission significant effects that can feasibly be avoided or mitigated will be avoided or mitigated by implementing the mitigation measures as set forth in the EIR, and the Findings of Fact and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, hereto attached as Exhibit "C." E. The six (6) significant impacts that will result from specific plan implementation identified in the Findings of Fact, which will be reduced to a level of insignificance will be substantially reduced in their impacts by implementing the mitigation measures set forth in the Findings of Fact, the EIR and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. F. The unavoidable significant impacts that will result from the implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan, which will not be reduced to a level of insignificance as set forth in the Findings of Fact, are, however, clearly outweighed by the economic, social and other benefits of the specific plan, as set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, hereto attached as Exhibit "B." The facts and conclusions set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations are true and are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including the Final EIR. G. The EIR has described a reasonable range of feasible alternative projects to the Downtown Specific Plan that could feasibly attain the basic objectives or might be more costly. A reasonable range of alternatives were considered in the review process of the Draft EIR and ultimate decisions on the project. The proposed specific plan represents the least environmentally damaging alternative that could feasibly attain the basic objectives of the project. SECTION 5. The Planning Commission of the City of Downey hereby adopts and incorporates herein by reference the following documents attached hereto as exhibits: (1) Findings of Fact; attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; (2) the Statement of Overriding Considerations, attached hereto as Exhibit "B"; and (3) the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached hereto as Exhibit "C." SECTION 6. The Planning Commission of the City of Downey hereby recommends the City Council certify the Final EIR, since the actions are complete and adequate, and because the Final EIR was prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, the state CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Downey's Revised Procedures for Implementing CEQA. Based on the findings set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby further recommends that the City Council adopt the Downey Downtown Specific Plan. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 5 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission SECTION 7. The Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 2010. Robert Kiefer, Vice -Chairman City Planning Commission I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of a Resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Downey at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 15'h day of September, 2010, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Lambros, Murray, Kiefer NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Vasquez ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Morales Theresa Donahue, Secretary City Planning Commission Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 6 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Exhibit A FINDINGS OF FACT 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND This document provides the Findings of Facts required for the approval of the Downtown Specific Plan (Project), as defined in the Final EIR. As required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Notice of Preparation ("NOP") to prepare the Downtown Specific Plan EIR was distributed on May 5, 2010 to responsible and trustee agencies, as well as private organizations and interested parties that may have an interest in the Project. The purpose of the NOP was to provide notification that the Lead Agency, i.e., the City of Downey (City), planned to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and to solicit guidance on the scope and content of the EIR. The NOP included a brief description of the Downtown Specific Plan (also "Project") and identified those environmental areas in which the Project could have potentially significant effects, as well as those areas where the Project would have no effect. The NOP is included in Appendix A of the Draft EIR.- On IR: On July 15, 2010, the City issued the Draft EIR for public review for a period of 45 days ending on August 30, 2010. A Notice of Availability ("Notice") was circulated, that announced the release of the Draft EIR, identified where it was available for review, described the project and its location, and summarized the significant environmental effects. The Notice stated where documents referenced in the Draft EIR are available for review, and stated the period for submittal of comments on the contents of the Draft EIR. The City distributed the Draft EIR to interested individuals, adjacent cities, county, regional and state agencies. Copies of the Draft EIR were also made available for public review at the Downey City Library, the City's Planning Division office, and on the City's website. The City received seven letters commenting on the Draft EIR during the public review period. The Draft EIR included a detailed description of the proposed Project, an analysis of its potential environmental effects, and an analysis of the effects of three alternatives to the project: • No Project (No Build); No Project (Build); and 50 Percent Residential/50 Percent Commercial. The Draft EIR also described cumulative impacts, growth -inducing impacts, significant irreversible environmental effects, and significant and unavoidable impacts. On September XX, 2010, the City released the Final EIR for the project. The Final EIR incorporates by reference the text of the Draft EIR and includes a Summary Chapter, responses to the letters commenting on the Draft EIR, and corrections and revisions to the Draft EIR. 2. PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND DESCRIPTION The objectives of the City (i.e., the Lead Agency) for the project are as follows (Draft EIR, p. 2- 5): Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 7 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission • Provide an appropriate amount of land area to absorb the city's future population growth (see General Plan, 1.1.2). Promote housing projects and mixed use projects that include housing within areas designated for the downtown area, transit -oriented developments, and areas in the vicinity of the Downey Landing Project (see General Plan, Program 1.1.2.2). • Promote Downtown Downey as a destination draw for entertainment and dining uses (see General Plan, Program 1.1.5.2) Promote mixed-use developments with housing on the same site or in proximity to commercial services to reduce the need for trips by vehicles (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.2). • Develop the downtown area as destination point for entertainment, dining, civic, and other activities (see General Plan, Program 1.2.2.1) • Capitalize on existing pedestrian traffic generated by the Downtown area by the movie theater, hotel, civic center and offices (see General Plan, Program 1.2.2.2). • Promote housing, mixed housing, and other land uses that will generate nighttime pedestrian traffic in the Downtown (see General Plan, Program 1.2.2.3). • Promote project designs that reduce dependency on vehicles and promote pedestrian transit, and alternate modes of travel (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.1). • Promote mixed-use developments with housing on the same site or in proximity to commercial services to reduce the need for trips by vehicles (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.1). • Provide dining opportunities within walking distances of employment centers (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.4). • Promote Downtown Downey as an economic core creating new employment opportunities. • Strengthen pedestrian, bicycle, and transit -oriented characteristics while ensuring access for automobiles. • Preserve and enhance the unique character of existing structures. • Identify Downtown as a cultural center for Downey. • Concentrate growth in Downtown while respecting and preserving surrounding residential neighborhoods. • Respect the needs of existing landowners in the downtown and minimize the use of eminent domain in the downtown area. The proposed Project consists of the development of a 131 acres of land located in Downey, California, between various east/west street sements that stretch from ParamOL)nt Boulevard to Brookshire Avenue that include sections of 4 h, 5th, and 71h Streets (north); the westerly side of Brookshire Avenue (east); the Union Pacific railway line (south); and the easterly side of Paramount Boulevard, except for the site of the Rives Mansion, located at the northwest corner of Paramount Boulevard and 3rd Street. The Project site is located in the center of the City, approximately 1.25 miles from the Rio Hondo River to the west and the San Gabriel River is located within two miles of the site to the east. Implementation of the proposed Project would require the following discretionary approvals by the agencies listed below. This EIR would be used by these agencies as a basis for such approvals. City of Downey • Approval of the Water Supply Assessment by the City Council; • Certification of this EIR by the City Council; Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 8 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission • Approval of the change regarding the General Plan land use designation for the Rives Mansion site to "Mixed Use" and the shuttered Gallatin Medical Center to "Mixed Use"; • Approval of an amendment to the General Plan to reflect the density ranges that are proposed in the Downtown Specific Plan; • Approval of Conditional Use Permits; • Approval of Site Plan Review applications; • Approval of Subdivision Maps; and • Approval of Permits for Grading and Drainage activities. 3. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS For purposes of CEQA and the findings set forth herein, the record of proceedings for the City of Downey's decision on the project consists of the following documents: • The NOP prepared for the Project; • Other public notices prepared in conjunction with the Project; • The Draft EIR; • All written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public comment period on the Draft EIR; ■ The Final EIR for the Project; ■ The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project; • All findings and resolutions adopted by the City of Downey in connection with the Project, and all documents cited or referred to therein; ■ All reports, studies, memoranda, maps, and other planning documents relating to the project prepared by the City of Downey, the City of Downey's consultants, or Responsible or Trustee agencies with respect to the City's compliance with the requirements of CEQA and with respect to the City of Downey action on the Project; ■ All documents submitted to the City of Downey by agencies or members of the public in connection with the project; • Minutes of public hearings held by the City of Downey in connection with the project; • Any documentary or other evidence submitted to the City of Downey at public hearings; and • Matters of common knowledge to the City of Downey, including, but not limited to federal, State, and local laws and regulations. The custodian of the documents is the City of Downey Community Development Department. 4. FINDINGS REQUIRED UNDER CEQA Under CEQA, for each significant environmental effect identified in an EIR for a proposed project, the approving agency must issue a written finding reaching one or more of three allowable conclusions: • Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant effects on the environment (Public Resources Code (PRC) §21081, subd. [a]); • Changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by the other agency (PRC §21081, subd. [b]); and • Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 9 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, made infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report (PRC §21081, subd. [c]). CEQA requires that the lead agency adopt mitigation measures or alternatives, where feasible, to avoid or substantially reduce significant environmental impacts that would otherwise occur as a result of a project. Project modification or alternatives are not required, however, where they are infeasible or where the responsibility for modifying the project lies with some other agency (State CEQA Guidelines §15091, subd. (a)[3]). Public Resources Code Section 21061.1 defines "feasible" to mean "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social and technological factors." State CEQA Guidelines Section 15364 adds another factor: "legal" considerations. (See, also Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors [Goleta II] [1990] 52 Cal. 3d 553, 565 [276 Cal. Rptr. 410]). Only after fully complying with the findings requirement can an agency adopt a statement of overriding considerations. (See, also Citizens for Quality Growth v. City of Mount Shasta [1988] 198 Cal.App.3d 433, 442, 445 [243 Cal. Rptr. 727].) In cases in which significant impacts are not at least "substantially mitigated," the agency, after adopting the findings, may approve the project if it first adopts a statement of overriding considerations setting forth the specific reasons why the agency found that the project's "benefits" rendered "acceptable" its "unavoidable adverse environmental effects" (State CEQA Guidelines §15093 and §15043, subd. [b]). The California Supreme Court has stated that, "the wisdom of approving any development project, a delicate task which requires a balancing of interests, is necessarily left to the sound discretion of the local officials and their constituents who are responsible for such decisions. The law as we interpret and apply it simply requires that those decisions be informed, and therefore balanced" (Goleta ll, 52 Cal.3d 553, 576 [276 Cal. Rptr. 401]). This document presents the City's findings as required by CEQA, cites substantial evidence in the record in support of each of the findings, and presents an explanation to supply the logical step between the finding and the facts in the record (State CEQA Guidelines §15091). 5. LEGAL EFFECTS OF FINDINGS To the extent that these findings conclude that various proposed mitigation measures outlined in the EIR are feasible and have not been modified, superseded or withdrawn, the City, in adopting the findings, commits to implementing these measures. In other words, these findings are not merely informational, but rather constitute a binding set of obligations that will go into effect when the City of Downey approves the project. The mitigation measures are referenced in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) (Exhibit C) adopted concurrently with these findings, and will be affected through the process of constructing and implementing the project. 6. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM An MMRP has been prepared for the Project, as required by PRC Section 21081.6, and included as Exhibit C to this resolution. The City will use the MMRP to track compliance with adopted mitigation measures. The City will consider the MMRP during the approval of the Downtown Specific Plan. The final MMRP will incorporate all mitigation measures adopted for the project under separate cover. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 10 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission 7. SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS, MITIGATION MEASURES, AND FINDINGS 7.1 Effects Determined to be Mitigated to Less than Significant Levels The potentially significant adverse environmental impacts that can be mitigated to less than significant levels are listed below. The City finds that these potentially significant impacts can be mitigated to a level that is considered less than significant after implementation of the Mitigation Measures identified in the EIR. Land Use Impact Impact LU -1: The proposed Project could potentially conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency over the Project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental impact. (Draft EIR, p. 3.1-15) Facts in Support of Findinq For the most part, the land uses proposed in the Downtown Specific Plan conform to the Downtown Plan's "Mixed Use" General Plan land use designation. An amendment to the General Plan is required for portions of the Downtown Specific Plan area that are outside of the current Downtown Specific Plan area to change the land use designations of these areas to "Mixed Use" and the density ranges to reflect those identified in the Downtown Specific Plan. These two areas consist of portions of the Paramount Boulevard Professional District (the area along Paramount Boulevard, between 5th and 8th Streets and the Rives Mansion site). Adoption of the Specific Plan would result in an amendment to the General Plan. Implementation of Mitigation Measure LU -1 would ensure that the General Plan is amended and reduce potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. Finding The potential impacts associated with potential conflicts with applicable land use plans, policies or regulations of an agency over the project are discussed in Section 3.1 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for impacts to relocated persons, households and businesses could be significant. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measure POP -1 would reduce potential impacts associated with potential conflicts with applicable land use plans, policies or regulations of an agency over the project to a less -than -significant level. Measure LU -1: The City of Downey shall, in conjunction with the approval of the proposed Specific Plan, amend the General Plan so that the entire planning area is designated as "Mixed Use" and change the residential density ranges of the planning area to reflect those in the proposed Specific Plan. Population and Housing Impact Impact POP -2: The proposed Project could displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. (Draft EIR, p. 3.2-10) Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 11 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Facts in Support of Finding Implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan would result in a shift in uses between the five proposed districts and could result in some displacement. Implementation of Mitigation Measure POP -1 would ensure compliance with applicable provisions of State law to provide relocation assistance to persons, households and businesses that may be displaced by the proposed Project and reduce potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. Finding The potential impacts associated with compliance with applicable provisions of State law associated with displacement of substantial numbers of people and the need to provide replacement housing are discussed in Section 3.2 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for impacts to relocated persons, households and businesses could be significant. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measure POP -2 would reduce potential impacts associated with potential displacement and the need to provide replacement housing to a less -than -significant level. Measure POP -1: Provide relocation assistance to households and businesses consistent with the requirements of the California Relocation Assistance Act of 1970 (Govt. Code § 7260 et seq.), State Relocation Guidelines (25 Cal. Code Regs § 6000, et seq.), and California Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code § 33410 et seq.), as applicable. Provide replacement of any units removed as a result of the project that were formerly occupied by very low-, low- or moderate -income households, consistent with California Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code § 33413). Population and Housing Impact Impact POP -3: The proposed Project could displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. (Draft EIR, p. 3.2-10) Facts in Support -of Finding The proposed Downtown Specific Plan could eventually result in development in the Downtown Specific Plan area in as many as 735 net new residential units and as much as approximately 1,308,897 net new commercial square feet. Although the proposed Project could result in demolition of existing commercial and residential uses, the proposed Downtown Specific Plan would replace them with new multi -family residential and new commercial and retail uses. Overall, the proposed Project would provide a net increase in both housing and employment within the project area. Therefore, there would be no net displacement of either the local residential population or local employment. Implementation of Mitigation Measure POP -2 would ensure compliance with applicable provisions of State law to provide relocation assistance to persons, households and businesses that may be displaced by the proposed Project, as well as providing opportunities for property owner and business participation in the City. Implementation of Mitigation Measure POP -1 would reduce potential impacts to a less -than -significant impact. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 12 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Finding The potential impacts associated with compliance with applicable provisions of State law to provide relocation assistance to persons, households and businesses that may be displaced by the proposed Project are discussed in Section 3.2 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for impacts to relocated persons, households and businesses could be significant. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measure POP -2 would reduce potential impacts associated with relocation to a less -than -significant level. Measure POP -2: Implement Mitigation Measure POP -1: Measure POP -1: Provide relocation assistance to households and businesses consistent with the requirements of the California Relocation Assistance Act of 1970 (Govt. Code § 7260 et seq.), State Relocation Guidelines (25 Cal. Code Regs § 6000, et seq.), and California Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code § 33410 et seq.), as applicable. Provide replacement of any units removed as a result of the project that were formerly occupied by very low-, low- or moderate -income households, consistent with California Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code § 33413). Traffic and Circulation Impact Impact TRAF-2: Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways. (Draft EIR, p. 3.3-23) Facts in Support of Finding The proposed Project could result in intersections falling below LOS E, the standard set by the City of Downey and the County of Los Angeles CMP. However, roadway improvements at all of the intersectiosn may be be consistent with the overall goal of creating a vibrant, pedestrian - and bicycle -friendly downtown area. Mitigation Measures implemented for Impact TRAF-1 through TRAF-5 could generally reduce impacts to a less -than -significant level. However, implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-6 would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Finding The potential impacts associated with potential conflicts with the applicable congestion management program and other standards are discussed in Section 3.3 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for impacts associated with these impacts would be significant. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measures already required would aid, but in particular implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 would reduce potential impacts to less -than -significant levels. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 13 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Measure TRAF-6: Implement Measure TRAF-2. Measure TRAF-2: All new development within the Specific Plan area shall be required to conform to the City's traffic standards. Noise Impact Impact N0I-1: Project construction could expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards. (Draft EIR, p. 3.6-11) Facts in Support of Finding Construction activity noise levels at and near construction areas would fluctuate depending on the particular type, number, and duration of uses of various pieces of construction equipment. Construction -related material haul trips would raise ambient noise levels along haul routes, depending on the number of haul trips made and types of vehicles used. In addition, certain types of construction equipment generate impulsive noises (such as pile driving), which can be particularly annoying. Pile driving, however, is not proposed for project development. Table 3.6-3 shows typical noise levels during different construction stages. Table 3.6-4 shows typical noise levels produced by various types of construction equipment. TABLE 3.6-3 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS Construction Phase Noise Level (dBA,_ Leq)a Ground Clearing 84 Excavation 89 Foundations 78 Erection 85 Finishing 89 Average noise levels correspond to a distance of 50 feet from the noisiest piece of equipment associated with a given phase of construction and 200 feet from the rest of the equipment associated with that phase. SOURCE: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Noise from Construction Equipment and Operations, Building Equipment, and Home Appliances, 1971. Noise from construction activities generally attenuates at a rate of 6 to 7.5 dBA per doubling distance. Based on the proposed Project site layout and terrain, an attenuation of 6 dBA will be assumed. Construction could occur adjacent to sensitive receptors. Table 3.6-3 states that excavation is 89 dBA at 50 feet, if sensitive receptors are located at this distance; and therefore, construction noise at these levels would be substantially greater than existing noise levels at nearby sensitive receptor locations. Eighty-nine (89)) dBA would also exceed the City's construction threshold of 85 dBA across a property boundary. These construction noise levels would be potentially significant. Subsequent exposure to construction noise by individual sensitive receptors could be lessened over time due to attenuation of noise by project structures built in the interim. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 14 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission TABLE 3.6-4 TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Construction Equipment Noise Level (dBA, Leq at 50 feet Dump Truck 88 Portable Air 81 Compressor 85 Concrete Mixer 88 (Truck) 88 Scraper 87 Jack Hammer 89 Dozer 76 Paver 85 Generator Backhoe SOURCE: Cunniff, Environmental Noise Pollution, 1977 The City's noise ordinance states that no person shall conduct construction activity between the hours of 9:00 PM and 7:00 AM, and no repair or remodeling shall exceed 85 dBA across any property boundary at any time during the course of a 24-hour day. Daytime construction is commonly exempt from noise ordinances because background noise is typically louder during the day than at night, and sleep disturbance is typically considered to be a nighttime impact. However, even daytime noise levels from construction can exceed daytime ambient levels and be a substantial annoyance to nearby residential units. Implementing Mitigation Measures NOI- 1 a through NOI-1 a would reduce nighttime and daytime construction noise levels to a less -than - significant level. Finding The potential impacts associated with the exposure of persons or the generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in local general plans, noise ordinances, or applicable standards or other agencies are discussed in Section 3.6 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for impacts associated with construction noise would be significant. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI-1 a through NOI-1 e would reduce potential impacts associated with construction noise. Measure NOI-1 a: Applicants/developers shall be required to secure a construction permit for exemption of the noise standards (Section 4606.5) prior to project implementation. Measure N101 -1b: As specified in City of Downey Ordinance No. 4606, no construction will occur between the hours of 9:00 PM and 7:00 AM. Measure NOI-1 c: All construction equipment shall use properly operating mufflers. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 15 Resolution No. 10-2_664 Downey Planning Commission Measure NOI-1 d: All construction staging shall be performed as far as possible from occupied dwellings. Measure NOI-1 e: Signs shall be posted at all construction sites within the Specific Plan area that include permitted construction days and hours, a contact number for the job site, and a contact number for the City of Downey Building and Safety Department, in the event daytime noise exceeds 85dBA across any property boundary. In that event the standard is exceeded, the City shall place a limit on the number of noisy pieces of equipment used at one time so that the noise level is reduced to the permissible level. Noise Impact Impact NOI-2: Operation of the project could expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plans noise ordinances, or applicable standards or other agencies. (Draft EIR, p. 3.6-13) Facts in Support of Finding Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Equipment Noise The HVAC system for maintaining comfortable temperatures within newly constructed or renovated buildings would consist of package rooftop air conditioning systems. Such rooftop HVAC units typically generate noise levels of approximately 55 dB at a reference distance of 100 feet from the operating units during maximum heating or air conditioning operations. The noise level of the HVAC, if on the edge of the building nearest the sensitive receptors could exceed the City's 55 dBA residential daytime noise standard. This would be a less -than - significant impact with the implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-2a. Loading Dock/Truck Delivery. Noise Delivery trucks are expected to be used during on-site commercial operations. The number of delivery trucks would depend on the individual businesses. Truck noise could potentially impact adjacent residents. Noise measurements of passing and idling delivery trucks were taken by Environmental Science Associates in 1999. An idling truck at 50 feet was found to produce noise levels of 72 dBA Leq, and a passing truck at 50 feet was found to produce noise levels of 68 dBA Leq. Cal -OSHA also requires backup beepers to be at least 5 dBA above ambient noise levels. These noise levels could potentially exceed the City's daytime and nighttime noise standards if loading docks were to occur near residents. With the incorporation of Mitigation Measures NOI-2b and NOI-2c, this would be a less -than -significant impact. Finding The potential impacts associated with the exposure of persons or the generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in local general plans, noise ordinances, or applicable standards or other agencies are discussed in Section 3.6 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for impacts on the nearest sensitive receptors would be significant. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-2a would reduce potential impacts associated with heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment noise. Implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI-2b and NOI-2c would reduce these potential impacts associated with on-site commercial operations to a less -than -significant level. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 16 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Measure NOI-2a: Building equipment (e.g., HVAC units) shall be located away from nearby residences, on building rooftops, and properly shielded by either the rooftop parapet or within an enclosure that effectively blocks the line of site of the source from the nearest receptors. The resultant HVAC noise level shall not exceed 45 dBA at the nearest receptors. Measure NOI-2b: In order to avoid noise -sensitive hours, commercial and retail land uses shall prohibit loading and unloading activities between the nighttime hours of 10:00 pm and 7:00 am. Measure NOI-2c: To further address the nuisance impact of loading dock/truck delivery noise, commercial and retail uses shall locate all loading areas for commercial and retail uses at the rear or sides of buildings within the commercial and mixed-use districts, where noise can be directed away from residential uses within the mixed use areas of the Project. Aesthetics Impact Impact AES -4: The proposed Specific Plan would create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. (Draft EIR, p. 3.7-13) Facts in Support of Finding Currently, the Downtown Plan requires that exterior lighting be provided with opaque deflection or shielding devices to prevent lighting from glaring or shining onto abutting properties and/or public rights-of-way. The Downtown Plan also requires regular maintenance of exterior signs. The proposed Downtown Specific Plan would not directly address exterior lighting, which would provide the City with flexibility in lighting. To ensure that light and glare are adequately addressed and that the impact is less than significant, the Downtown Specific Plan shall adopt the light and glare provisions of the Downtown Specific Plan, as stated in Mitigation Measure AES -1, below. Finding The potential impacts associated with the creation of new sources of substantial light or glare are discussed in Section 3.7 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for significant impacts related to light and glare would be significant. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measure AES -1 would reduce these potential impacts to a less -than - significant level. Measure AES -1: The City shall ensure that the Specific Plan requires the minimal glare provisions set forth in the existing Downtown Plan. Aesthetics Impact Impact AES -5: The proposed Specific Plan could result in cumulatively and substantially adverse aesthetic impacts. (Draft EIR, p. 3.7-13) Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 17 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Facts in Support of Finding The Downtown Specific Plan would apply to a discrete area in Downey. A unified strategy and vision for the downtown would result in an improvement in the visual quality of downtown. This improvement would result in creating a distinctive downtown. Surrounding residential areas would benefit by the proposed upgrade in visual quality in the downtown and the unified and integrated vision for the downtown. Currently, undeveloped edges detract from the neat residential areas surrounding the downtown. The Downtown Specific Plan promotes the visual quality of the downtown area. This would be considered a beneficial impact. By focusing attention and feasible development strategies in an expanded downtown area, the Specific Plan would eliminate the possibility of streets without adequate landscaping, conflicting architectural elements and building mass, and "blind walls" along street facades. Implementation of Mitigation Measure AES -2 would eliminate the potential for cumulative impacts related to light and glare and result in a less than significant impact. Finding The potential impacts associated with potential cumulative impacts to aesthetics are discussed in Section 3.7 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for significant impacts related to cumulative aesthetics impacts would be significant. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measure AES -2 would reduce these potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. Measure AES -2: Implement Mitigation Measure AES -1: Measure AES -1: The City shall ensure that the Specific Plan requires the minimal glare provisions set forth in the existing Downtown Plan. Cultural Resources Impact Impact CUL -1: The implementation of the Specific Plan could adversely affect recorded historic architectural resources directly through demolition or substantial alteration, or indirectly through changes to the historical setting. (Draft EIR, p. 3.8-13) Facts in Support of the Finding Numerous provisions within the Downtown Specific Plan are designed to protect and enhance cultural resources. For example, the overall intent of the design standards and guidelines contained within the Downtown Specific Plan is to both encourage new infill construction and retain and rehabilitate older structures towards the creation of an eclectic mix of new and old buildings that can accommodate the widest range of local and national businesses. To encourage this mix, the following standards and guidelines are provided: 3.6.10.A. Architecturally or Historically Significant Buildings as Defined by the City of Downey — If a building within the specific pan area is determined by the City of Downey to be architecturally and historically significant, appropriate reuse, rehabilitation, and/or preservation of the structure may be required by the City in accordance with adopted ordinances. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 18 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission 3.6.10.B. Renovation of Existing Buildings — To the maximum extent feasible, when existing buildings are improved and/or repaired, character -defining features such as ornament, proportions of windows, storefronts, and other original features should be retained and repaired. The design guidelines and standards also state that "Architecturally and/or historically significant storefronts within the Downtown Specific Plan Area shall be maintained, restored, and/or rehabilitated in place. Moving historic storefronts to other building locations for any purpose is not allowed. Any new use or renovation of a storefront shall retain to the maximum extent feasible historic features and spatial relationships that characterize a property." The Design Element of the City of Downey 2025 General Plan contains a number of program policies designed to preserve the City's cultural resources, including Program 8.4.2. (Promote the preservation and restoration of older structures), Program 8.4.2.4 (Encourage adaptive re- use of older structures), Program 8.4.2.5 (Reuse existing historic architectural elements in new construction when preservation of historic resources is not feasible), and Program 8.4.2.6 (Discourage the relocation of historic resources, or if necessary, relocate the historic resource within Downey). While all of the existing and proposed policies listed above would help to reduce potentially significant impacts to historic resources, potential widening of the major arterial, secondary arterial, or collector streets identified in the Specific Plan could result in significant direct or indirect impacts to two recorded historic structures within the Plan area: the James C. Rives Mansion on Paramount Boulevard or the Union Pacific Railroad. As specific impacts to these recorded resources are unknown, they are considered potentially significant. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL -2a would reduce impacts to these known, recorded historic resources to a less -than -significant level. Findings The potential impacts associated with recorded historic architectural resources, including demolition, substantial alteration or through changes to the historical setting are discussed in Section 3.8 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for significant impacts to recorded historic architectural resources would be significant. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL -1 would reduce these potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. Measure CUL -1: Implement Mitigation Measure CUL -2a: Measure CUL -2a: The City of Downey shall evaluate the potential direct and indirect effects to the James C. Rives Mansion and the Union Pacific Railroad prior to any roadway widening efforts resulting from implementation of the Specific Plan. If the evaluation determines that the roadway widening efforts (or any other activity resulting from Plan implementation) would directly or indirectly impact either the Rives Mansion or the applicable segment of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks, the City shall redesign the project to avoid significant impacts, such as retaining the existing width of the street(s) in the location of these Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 19 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission historical resources and/or the retention of historic roadway or railway materials (in the case of the Union Pacific Railroad). Cultural Resources Impact Impact CUL -2: The implementation of the Specific Plan could adversely affect unrecorded historic architectural resources directly through demolition or substantial alteration, or indirectly through demolition or substantial alteration, or indirectly through changes to the historical setting. (Draft EIR, p. 3.8-14) Facts in Support of the Finding The construction of new parking, residential, commercial, or infrastructure facilities within the Downtown Specific Plan area has the potential to impact historic architectural resources directly through demolition or substantial alteration, or indirectly through changes to structures' historic settings. While the City's existing and proposed policies regarding historic resources, would help to reduce potentially significant impacts to historic resources, because no comprehensive historic inventory of the Downtown Specific Plan area has been completed to date, the number of buildings or structures that are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historic Resources is unknown. The Downtown Specific Plan area contains numerous buildings 45 years old or older, which may qualify as historic resources upon future review if other evaluation criteria apply such as the buildings are important associations with historical events or important people, or are examples of fine architecture or were designed by master architects. A review of Assessor Parcel Data for the Specific Plan area by the City identified 94 properties dating to 1965 or older with an average construction date of 1961, or 49 years old, as of 2010. Many of the oldest buildings in the Downtown Specific Plan area are concentrated on Downey Avenue, as well as La Reina Avenue, 3`d Street, Paramount Boulevard, and Firestone Boulevard. If determined eligible, proposed future projects resulting from implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan could result in the demolition or substantial alteration of potential historic resources, which would be considered a significant impact. Future projects resulting from the Downtown Specific Plan could also indirectly alter historic resources through changes to their immediate historic setting, which would also be considered a significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL -2a and CUL -2b would minimize this impact to a less -than -significant level. Findings The potential impacts associated with unrecorded historic architectural resources through demolition or substantial alteration, or through changes to the historical setting are discussed in Section 3.8 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for significant impacts to potential unrecorded historic architectural resources would be significant. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL -2a and CUL -2b would reduce these potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. Measure CUL -2a: The City of Downey shall evaluate the potential direct and indirect effects to the James C. Rives Mansion and the Union Pacific Railroad prior to any roadway widening efforts resulting from implementation of the Specific Plan. If the Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 20 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission evaluation determines that the roadway widening efforts (or any other activity resulting from Plan implementation) would directly or indirectly impact either the Rives Mansion or the applicable segment of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks, the City shall redesign the project to avoid significant impacts, such as retaining the existing width of the street(s) in the location of these historical resources and/or the retention of historic roadway or railway materials (in the case of the Union Pacific Railroad). Measure CUL -2b: The Downtown Specific Plan shall include a new policy 3.6.10.0 — Site Specific Historical Survey and Evaluation - which states that a survey and evaluation shall be completed for all structures on a proposed project site or immediate vicinity that are 45 years old or older at the time of project initiation or if sufficient time has passed to obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resource to understand its historical importance. The survey shall be carried out by a qualified historian or architectural historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Architectural History. Cultural Resources Impact Impact CUL -3: Construction of future projects resulting from implementation of the Specific Plan could have substantial adverse impact to previously unknown archaeological resources. (Draft EIR, p. 3.8-16) Facts in Support of the Finding The City of Downey General Plan Program 8.4.2.7 calls for the City to work to preserve or relocate archeological resources within the City. Although no prehistoric or historic -era archaeological resources have been recorded within the Downtown Specific Plan area or within one-half mile of the Specific Plan area, it is possible that previously unknown and unrecorded archaeological resources could exist anywhere within the Downtown Specific Plan area, and may be unearthed during excavation and grading activities for individual projects. This can occur even in already developed areas, as older buildings are known to have often been built on top of or within archaeological deposits. If previously undiscovered artifacts or remains are uncovered during excavation or construction, significant impacts could occur. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL -3a and CUL -3b would reduce this impact to a less -than -significant level. Findings The potential impacts associated with the disturbance of unknown archaeological resources within the City are discussed in Section 3.8 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for the unintentional disturbance of archaeological resources could be significant. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL -3a and CUL -3b would reduce these potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. Measure CUL -3a: In the event that such archaeological resources are uncovered during construction -related activities, the on-site contractor's construction supervisor shall stop all activity within the immediate vicinity of the discovery, unless safety issues are of concern. Specifically, the construction crew will stop work at the location where the find Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 21 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission was uncovered and shall not resume construction within 20 feet of the find until cleared to proceed by the archaeologist. The construction supervisor shall immediately notify the City, who will then notify the qualified archaeologist and, if appropriate, a Native American monitor, in coordination with the City staff, will assess the geographic extent and scientific value of the resource. If significant archaeological materials are determined, the archaeologist shall record and recover the resources using standard professional archaeological methods. Measure CUL -3b: The Specific Plan shall include a new policy 3.6.10.11) — Halt Work for Accidental Discovery of Historic Materials, which states that should prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources be discovered during construction, all activity in the vicinity of the find shall stop and a qualified archaeologist shall be contacted to assess the significance of the find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If any find is determined to be significant, the lead agency and the archaeologist shall determine, in consultation with local Native American groups, appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate mitigation. Cultural Resources Impact Impact CUL -4: Construction of future projects resulting from implementation of the Specific Plan could have substantial adverse impacts to previously unknown paleontological resources. (Draft EIR, p. 3.8-16) Facts in Support of Finding The Downtown Specific Plan area is underlain by Holocene and Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits. Disturbed soils, artificial fills, and Holocene -aged deposits are unlikely to have preserved fossil remains. However, beneath the surficial material lies Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits known to have yielded significant paleontological resources. These deposits are likely to exist at variable and unknown depths beneath the surface. Any project -related excavations beneath or beyond previously disturbed fills would have the potential to disturb or uncover fossil remains. In addition, the likelihood of uncovering paleontological resources increases with depth, and is dependent on the sub -grade footprint of the proposed structure. Generally, the potential to encounter paleontological resources in the Downtown Specific Plan area is low. However, because disturbance of in situ sediment is certainly possible, the impact of the Project on paleontological resources would be potentially significant. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL -4 would reduce this impact to a less -than -significant level. Finding The potential impacts associated with the disturbance of unknown paleontological sites are discussed in Section 3.8 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for the unintentional disturbance of paleontological could be significant. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL -4 would reduce these potential impacts to a less -than - significant level. Measure CUL -4: The Specific Plan shall include a new policy 3.6.10.E — Halt Work for Accidental Discovery of Paleontological Resources, which states that in the event Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 22 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission paleontological resources are discovered, the lead agency shall notify a qualified paleontologist. The paleontologist shall document the discovery as needed, evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the find under the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If fossil or fossil -bearing deposits are discovered during construction, excavations within 50 feet of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted until the discovery is examined by a qualified paleontologist (in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards). The paleontologist shall notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the lead agency determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of the project on the qualities that make the resource important. The plan shall be submitted to the lead agency for review and approval prior to implementation. Cultural Resources Impact Impact CUL -5: Construction of future projects could result in the substantial change of previously unidentified human remains. (Draft EIR, p. 3.8-17) Facts in Support of Finding A search of the Native American Heritage Commission's Sacred Lands File, along with confirmation from the tribal chair of the Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California, indicate that no known site in the Specific Plan area has been used for human burial purposes in the recent or distant past. However, in the unlikely event that human remains are discovered, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries, the human remains could be inadvertently damaged, which could be a significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL -5 would minimize this potential impact to a less -than -significant level. Findings The potential impacts associated with the disturbance of human burial sites are discussed in Section 3.8 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for the unintentional disturbance of human remains would be significant. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL -5 would reduce these potential impacts to a less -than - significant level. Measure CUL -5: The Specific Plan shall include a new policy that states that if human skeletal remains are uncovered during project construction, work in the vicinity of the find shall cease and the County coroner will be contacted to evaluate the remains, following the procedures and protocols set forth in Section 15064.5 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, he/she shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641) and the Most Likely Descendant will be identified. The Most Likely Descendant will make recommendations for the treatment of any human remains. Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located, is not Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 23 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendents regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Hazardous Materials and Hazards Impact Impact HAZ-1: Disturbance and release of contaminated soil during demolition and construction, or transportation of excavated material, or contaminated groundwater could expose construction workers, the public, or the environment to adverse conditions related to hazardous materials handling. (Draft EIR, p. 3.9-11) Facts in Support of Findings Future development within the Downtown Specific Plan area could include excavation for installation of utilities, building foundations, subterranean development, or for re -grading purposes. Disturbance of subsurface soils and groundwater at locations that may have been previously contaminated by prior uses could further disperse existing contamination into the environment and expose construction workers or the public to contaminants. If high enough levels of hazardous materials in excavated soils should go undetected, health and safety risks to workers and the public could occur. Exposure to hazardous materials could cause various short-term and/or long-term health effects. Possible health effects could be acute (immediate or of short-term severity), chronic (long-term, recurring, or resulting from repeated exposure), or both. Acute effects, often resulting from a single exposure, could result in a range of effects from minor to major, such as nausea, vomiting, headache, dizziness, or burns. Chronic exposure could result in systemic damage or damage to organs, such as the lungs, liver, or kidneys. Health effects would be specific to each hazardous material. Two Leaking Underground Fuel Tank (LUFT) sites are present within the Downtown Specific Plan area. These sites have had documented releases of hazardous materials that affected the subsurface soil or groundwater or both. One of these sites is in varying stages of investigation and cleanup, and has already received site closure from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Contamination may also be present at some other unidentified locations where unidentified releases have occurred. It is not uncommon to encounter unexpected conditions once excavation and groundbreaking activities commence. Implementation of the mitigation measure below can minimize potential exposure to workers, the public and the environment and result in a less than significant impact under CEQA. Implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 would reduce potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. Findings The potential impacts associated with the disturbance and release of contaminated soils during demolition and construction, or transportation of excavated material, or contaminated groundwater that could expose construction workers, the public, or the environment to adverse conditions related to hazardous materials handling are discussed in Section 3.9 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for disturbance and release of contaminated soils during demolition and construction, or transportation of excavated workers could expose construction workers, the public, or the environment to adverse conditions in regard to hazardous materials handling. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 24 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission the Project that mitigate Implementation of Mitigation less -than -significant level. or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Measure HAZ-1 would reduce these potential impacts to a Measure HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of any building permit, all proposed development sites where previous hazardous materials releases have occurred shall have a Phase I site assessment performed by a qualified environmental consulting firm in accordance with ASTM E 1527-05. All proposed development in the Specific Plan area shall require remediation and cleanup to levels established by the overseeing regulatory agency (HHMD, RWQCB or DTSC) appropriate for the proposed new use of the site. All proposed groundbreaking activities within areas of identified or suspected contamination shall be conducted according to a site-specific health and safety plan, prepared by a licensed professional. Hazardous Materials and Hazards Impact Impact HAZ-2: Disturbance and release of hazardous structural and building components (i.e., asbestos, lead, PCBs, USTs, and ASTs) during demolition and construction phases of development or transport of these materials could expose construction phases of development, or transport of these materials could expose construction workers, the public, or the environment to adverse conditions related to hazardous materials handing. (Draft EIR, p. 3.9- 12) Facts in SUpport of Findings Asbestos F Asbestos could be encountered during structural demolition of the existing buildings and may require containment and disposal. Based on the age of the buildings within the Specific Plan area, it is likely that some asbestos -containing materials (AGMs) are present. Affected buildings would need appropriate abatement of identified asbestos prior to demolition or renovation. ACMs are regulated both as a hazardous air pollutant under the Clean Air Act and as a potential worker safety hazard under the authority of Cal/OSHA. The renovation or demolition of buildings containing asbestos would require retaining contractors licensed to conduct asbestos abatement work and notifying the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 10 days prior to initiating construction and demolition activities. Section 19827.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, adopted January 1, 1991, requires that local agencies not issue demolition or alteration permits until an applicant has demonstrated compliance with notification requirements under applicable federal regulations regarding hazardous air pollutants, including asbestos. The SCAQMD is vested by the California Legislature with authority to regulate airborne pollutants, including asbestos, through both inspection and law enforcement, and is to be notified 10 days in advance of any proposed demolition or abatement work. Potential exposure to asbestos, and its related chronic adverse health effects, is possible throughout demolition and renovation if ACMs are present during operations. Implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-2a, HAZ-2b and HAZ-2d, below, would reduce potential impacts to less -than -significant levels. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 25 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Lead and Lead -Based Paint Lead-based paint could be separated from building materials during demolition activities. Separated paint can be classified as a hazardous waste if the lead content exceeds 1,000 parts per million; such paint would need to be disposed of accordingly. Additionally, lead-based paint chips can pose a hazard to workers and adjacent sensitive land uses. Both the federal and California Occupational Safety and Heath Administrations (OSHAs) regulate all worker exposure during construction activities that involve and affect lead-based paint. Interim Final Rule found in 29 CFR Part 1926.62 covers construction work where employees may be exposed to lead during activities such as demolitions, removal, surface preparation for re- painting, renovation, clean up and routine maintenance. The OSHA -specified method of compliance includes respiratory protection, protective clothing, housekeeping (collecting and containing all debris), hygiene facilities, medical surveillance, training, etc. Demolition and renovation work could create exposure to lead-based paint present in building structures. Dust generating activities that include removal of walls, sanding, welding, and material disposal could produce airborne quantities of lead -laden material. These materials could expose workers and persons in close proximity, including occupants of off-site locations. The Specific Plan area contains buildings with painted surfaces, such as drywall, ceilings, and exterior stucco, which could contain lead-based paint. Implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-2a, HAZ-2b and HAZ-2c would reduce potential impacts from exposure to lead-based paint to less -than -significant levels. PCB -Containing Materials Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) or PCB -containing materials may be present within existing structures in the Downtown Specific Plan area. Demolition of these structures could disturb these materials and expose workers or the public to adverse effects. Similar to the procedures for removal of ACMs, an initial site-specific survey to determine the presence of PCBs would need to be conducted, followed by implementation of appropriate measures to handle any materials with PCBs. Implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-2a, HAZ-2b and HAZ-2e, below, would require demolition activities to be conducted by licensed contractors according to the standards of overseeing agencies that would reduce the potential impacts of hazardous building materials to less -than -significant levels. Findings The potential impacts associated with disturbance and release of hazardous structural and building components, such as asbestos, lead, PCBs and ASTs, are discussed in Section 3.9 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for releases of hazardous materials into the environment during demolition and construction phases of development or transport of these materials and their potential to expose construction workers, the public and/or the environment to these hazardous materials would be considered a significant impact. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-2a, HAZ-2b, and HAZ- 2d would reduce the potential impacts of exposure to ACMs to a less -than -significant level. Implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-2a, HAZ-2b and HAZ-2c would reduce potential impacts associated with exposure to lead-based paint to a less -than - significant level. Implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-2a, HAZ-2b and HAZ-2e Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 26 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission would reduce potential impacts associated with exposure to PCBs to a less -than - significant level. Measure HAZ-2a: Each structure proposed for demolition shall require an assessment by licensed contractors for the potential presence of lead-based paint or coatings, asbestos containing materials, or PCB -containing equipment prior to obtaining a demolition permit. Measure HAZ-2b: If the assessment required by Mitigation Measure HAZ-2a establishes the presence of lead-based paint, asbestos, and/or PCBs, the developer or project applicant shall create and implement a health and safety plan to protect workers from risks associated with hazardous materials during demolition or renovation of affected structures. Measure HAZ-2c: If the assessment required by Mitigation Measure HAZ-2a finds presence of lead-based paint, the developer or project applicant shall develop and implement a lead-based paint removal plan by a licensed contractor. The plan shall specify, but not be limited to, the measures taken to contain, store, and transport paint waste in accordance with the licensed disposal facilities requirements. Measure HAZ-2d: If the assessment required by Mitigation Measure HAZ-2a finds presence of asbestos, the project sponsor shall ensure that asbestos abatement shall be conducted by a licensed contractor prior to building demolition. Measure HAZ-2e: If the assessment required by Mitigation Measure HAZ-2a finds presence of PCBs, the project sponsor shall ensure that PCB abatement shall be conducted prior to building demolition or renovation. Hazardous Materials and Hazards Impact Impact HAZ-3: Hazardous materials used on any individual site during construction activities (i.e., fuels, lubricants, solvents) could be released into the environment through improper storage. Proposed development of the Specific Plan area could result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to hazardous materials in the City of Downey. (Draft EIR, p. 3.9-14) Facts in Support of Finding Future construction activities would require the use of certain hazardous materials, such as fuels, oils, lubricants, solvents, and glues. Inadvertent release of large quantities of these materials into the environment could adversely impact soil, surface waters, or groundwater quality. Larger developments could potentially include on-site storage and/or use of quantities of materials capable of significantly impacting soil and groundwater. Implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-3 would reduce the impacts to a less -than -significant level. Finding The potential impacts associated with hazardous materials during construction activities and the potential for releases through improper storage are discussed in Section 3.9 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential for releases of hazardous materials into the environmental through improper storage would be considered a significant impact. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 27 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-3, below, would reduce these potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. Measure HAZ-3: All development and redevelopment shall require the use of construction l3MPs to control handling of hazardous materials during construction to minimize the potential negative effects from an accidental release into storm drains, groundwater and soils. Biological Resources Impact Impact 13I0-1: Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or though habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (Draft EIR, p. 3.12-9) Facts in Support of Finding The complete urbanization of the City prohibits the possibility of any special -status species to occur within the City's limits and therefore be affected by the proposed Project. Moreover, there are no recorded occurrences of special -status species in the vicinity of the project area. The proposed Project could affect nesting native birds that have the potential to occur on or adjacent to the site. The project site contains some large street trees that could provide nesting opportunities for resident birds. Impacts to individual nesting or migratory birds could occur if these species were nesting or foraging on or adjacent to the construction areas at the time of construction. Removal of trees or shrubs that provide nesting habitat could result in the direct mortality of birds. Tree removal, construction noise, vibrations, and human disturbance could cause nest abandonment, death of the young, or loss of reproductive potential at active nests located near project activities. Finding The potential impacts associated with candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are discussed in Section 3.12 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential direct or indirect effect on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service directly or indirectly through habitat modifications would be considered a significant impact. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 13I0-1, below, would reduce these potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. Measure 13I0-1: Should project construction be scheduled to commence between February 1 and August 31, a pre -construction survey will be conducted by a qualified biologist. The survey shall cover all reasonably potential nesting locations located on or closely adjacent to the project site. This survey will occur within 30 days of the on -set of construction. A survey shall also be conducted no more than five days prior to initiation of clearance or construction work. If ground disturbance activities are delayed, additional pre -construction surveys will be conducted such that no more than five days will have Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 28 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission elapsed between the last survey and the commencement of ground disturbance activities. If an active nest is located, a qualified biologist shall determine a suitable buffer distance, which shall be placed around the nest and shall remain off-limits to construction until it is determined (by a biologist) that the nest is no longer in use. Limits of construction to avoid an active nest shall be established in the field with flagging, fencing, or other appropriate barriers; and construction personnel shall be instructed on the sensitivity of nest areas. Biological Resources Impact Impact BIO -5: Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance. (Draft EIR, p. 3.12-11) Facts in Support of Finding Implementation of the Specific Plan could result in the removal of several mature trees located on public and private property, some of which may be considered "significant trees," according to Chapter 4, Conservation Element, Vision 2025 General Plan. Per Chapter 6, Section 7605 of the City's Municipal Code also stipulates that: "Any street tree removed shall be replaced if a replacement is deemed appropriate and if it is mutually agreed to by both the City and the property owner. The replacement tree shall be selected in accordance with the official Tree Species List and Master Street Tree Plan. No public street tree will be removed/planted without having obtained a permit from the Public Works Department." The removal of any tree identified as a significant tree would be considered permanent and irreplaceable. Finding The potential impacts associated with potential conflicts with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance are discussed in Section 3.12 of the EIR. The EIR analysis concluded that the Project's potential to conflict with the City's Tree Ordinance would be considered a significant impact. As a result, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO -5a through BIO -5g, below, would reduce these potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. Measure BIO -5a: Coordination with Community Development Department. The applicant shall work with the Community Development Department to identify significant trees that may be impacted by implementation of the Project. If a significant tree is identified within the Project site, the applicant shall work with the Public Works Department on measures to preserve significant trees. Measure BIO -5b: Tree Permit. No public street tree will be removed or planted without having obtained a permit from the Public Works Department. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 29 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Measure BIO -5c: Tree Survey. The applicant shall retain a certified arborist to conduct a tree survey and evaluation of all significant trees that would be removed or potentially impacted. The survey shall identify the species and trunk diameter (when measured at 4.5 feet above the mean natural grade). The physical condition of each significant tree will be assessed and an alphabetical ranking shall be assigned to each tree ('A' being best and 'F' being worst) for rating the tree's overall health. In addition, a Tree Replacement Plan shall be developed for the development site. The Plan shall include a minimum 2 -year monitoring plan that includes performance standards for measuring and evaluating the health of all replacement trees and significant trees that would be preserved. Measure BIO -5d: Replacement Trees. All replacement trees shall be selected in accordance with the City's official Tree Species List and Master Street Tree Plan. All replacement trees will be planted on-site, following grading activities. Measure BIO -5e: Preservation of Significant Trees. All significant trees that would be preserved that are located within 50 feet of land clearing or areas to be graded shall be enclosed in a temporary fenced zone for the duration of the clearing or grading activities. Fencing shall extend to the root protection zone (i.e., the area at least 15 feet from the trunk or five feet from the drip line, whichever distance is greater). No parking or storage of equipment, solvents or chemicals that could adversely affect the trees shall be allowed within 25 feet of the trunk at any time. Removal of the fence shall occur only after the project biologist confirms the health of significant trees that would be preserved. Measure BIO -5f: Construction Monitoring. A certified arborist shall periodically monitor on-site construction and grading activities occurring near all preserved significant trees to ensure that damage to these trees does not occur. Prior to initiation of construction activities, the certified arborist shall schedule a field meeting to inform personnel (involved in construction) where all protective zones are located and the importance of avoiding encroachment within the protective zones. 7.2 Environmental Effects Which Would Remain Significant and Unavoidable After Mitigation Air Quality Impact Impact AIR -2: Project construction could violate air quality standards or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation during the short-term duration of construction. (Draft EIR, p. 3.4-12) Facts in Support of Finding Construction -related emissions would occur intermittently for approximately 15 years. Project construction activities would include demolition, site preparation, earthmoving, and general construction. Site preparation includes activities such as general land clearing and grubbing. Earthmoving activities include cut -and -fill operations, trenching, soil compaction, and grading. General construction includes adding improvements such as structures and facilities. The emissions generated from these construction activities include: • Dust (including PM10 and PM2.5) primarily from "fugitive" sources (i.e., emissions released through means other than through a stack or tailpipe) such as soil disturbance; Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 30 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Combustion emissions of criteria air pollutants (ROG, NOx, CO, CO2, PM10, and PM2.5) primarily from operation of heavy off-road construction equipment (primarily diesel -operated), portable auxiliary equipment, and construction worker automobile trips (primarily gasoline -operated); and Evaporative emissions (ROG) from asphalt paving and architectural coatings. Construction -related fugitive dust emissions would vary from day to day, depending on the level and type of activity, silt content of the soil, and the weather. In the absence of mitigation, construction activities may result in significant quantities of dust, and as a result, local visibility and PM10 concentrations may be adversely affected on a temporary and intermittent basis during construction. In addition, the fugitive dust generated by construction would include not only PM10, but also larger particles, which would fall out of the atmosphere within several hundred feet of the site and could result in nuisance -type impacts. It is mandatory for all construction projects in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 for fugitive dust (SCAQMD, 2005b). Specific Rule 403 control requirements include, but are not limited to, applying water in sufficient quantities to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes, applying soil binders to uncovered areas, reestablishing ground cover as quickly as possible, utilizing a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the project site, and maintaining effective cover over exposed areas. NOx, ROG, PM10, PM2.5, CO, and CO2 construction emissions were estimated for a worst- case day based on default crew, truck trip, and equipment. Emissions are based on criteria pollutant emission factors from URBEMIS 2007. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 3.4-6 of the EIR. Although implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR -2a through AIR -2e would help reduce construction -related emissions, as shown in Table 3.4-6 of the EIR, construction emissions of NOx would exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance and would therefore be significant without mitigation. The City has adopted policies that support the project as part of the General Plan. These policies include: ■ Provide an appropriate amount of land area to absorb the city's future population growth (see General Plan, Policy 1.1.2). • Promote housing projects and mixed use projects that include housing within areas designated for the downtown area, transit -oriented developments, and areas in the vicinity of the Downey Landing Project (see General Plan, Program 1.1.2.2). • Promote Downtown Downey as a destination draw for entertainment and dining uses (see General Plan, Program 1.1.5.2). • Promote mixed-use developments with housing on the same site or in proximity to commercial services to reduce the need for trips by vehicles (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.2). • Develop the downtown area as a destination point for entertainment, dining, civic, and other activities (see General Plan, Program 1.2.2.1). Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 31 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission • Capitalize on existing pedestrian traffic generated by the Downtown area by the movie theater, hotel, civic center and offices (see General Plan, Program 1.2.2.2). • Promote housing, mixed-use housing, and other land uses that will generate nighttime pedestrian traffic in the Downtown (see General Plan, Program 1.2.2.3). • Promote project designs that reduce dependency on vehicles and promote pedestrian, transit, and alternate modes of travel (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.1). • Promote mixed-use developments with housing on the same site or in proximity to commercial services to reduce the need for trips by vehicles (see General Plan, Program Finding 1.2.1.2). Provide dining opportunities within walking distances of employment centers (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.4). Issues associated with the proposed Project on air quality are discussed in Section 3.4 of the EIR. The EIR concludes that implementation of the mitigation measures stated below would not reduce emissions during the short-term duration of construction to a less -than -significant impact under current standards. Despite implementation of the stated mitigation measures, significant and unavoidable impacts would remain. Consistent with the adopted policies and programs associated with the social benefits identified by the General Plan, including General Plan Policy 1.1.2, Program 1.1.2.2, Program 1.1.5.2, Program 1.2.1.2, Program 1.2.2.1, Program 1.2.1.2, Program 1.2.1.4, Program 1.2.2.2, and Program 1.2.2.3, the impact is overridden by the Project's benefits as set forth in the statement of overriding considerations. The following mitigation measures from the EIR are applicable and will mitigate these impacts to the extent feasible; however, construction air quality impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. Measure AIR -2a: The City shall ensure that a fugitive dust control program is implemented pursuant to the provision of SCAQMD Rule 403 for all new development. Measure AIR -2b: Prior to grading and construction, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the following: A. During clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation, maintain equipment engines in proper tune. B. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation: 1. Wet the area down, sufficient enough to form a crust on the surface with repeated soakings, as necessary, to maintain the crust and prevent dust pick up by the wind. 2. Spread soil binders. 3. Implement street sweeping as necessary. C. During construction: 1. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site. 2. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day. 3. Use low sulfur fuel (0.05 percent by weight) for construction equipment. D. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 32 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Measure AIR -2c: Prior to grading and construction, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the following: A. Require a phased schedule for construction activities to minimize daily emissions. B. Schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. C. Treat unattended construction areas with water (disturbed lands which have been, or are expected to be, unused for four or more consecutive days). D. Require the planting of vegetative ground cover as soon as possible on construction sites. E. Install vehicle wheel -washers before the roadway entrance at construction sites. F. Wash off trucks leaving the site. G. Require all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose substances and building materials to be covered, or to maintain a minimum freeboard of two feet between the top of the load and the top of the truck bed sides. H. Use vegetative stabilization, whenever possible, to control soil erosion from stormwater, especially on super pads. I. Require enclosures or chemical stabilization of open storage piles of sand, dirt, or other aggregate materials. J. Control off-road vehicle travel by posting driving speed limits on these roads, consistent with City standards. K. Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline power generators. L. Measure AIR -2d: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for assuring that construction vehicles are equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions. Measure AIR -2e: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion into the project grading permit. Measures, subject to the approval and verification by the Building & Safety Division, shall include, as appropriate: A. Provision of rideshare incentives. B. Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. C. Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interference. D. Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. E. Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. Air Quality Impact Impact AIR -3: Project operations could violate air quality standards or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation during long-term operations. (Draft EIR, p. 3.4-16) Facts in Support of Finding Operational emissions for the proposed Project would be generated primarily from on -road vehicular traffic, area sources (such as landscaping equipment), and indirectly by the energy consumption of the buildings proposed under the proposed Specific Plan. Because power is provided to the City via an integrated electricity grid, indirect emissions from the use of electricity could occur at any of the fossil -fueled power plants in California or neighboring states, Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 33 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission or from hydroelectric or nuclear plants or renewable energy sources. For all power plants, it can be assumed that the emissions are reviewed as part of the permitting process before the power plant is built or expanded. Operational emissions for mobile and area sources are based on criteria pollutant emission factors from URBEMIS 2007. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 3.4-7 of the EIR. Implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR -3a, AIR -3b and AIR -3e would be required to reduce the impact of operational emissions, although build -out of the proposed Specific Plan would exceed all SCAQMD thresholds of significance and would therefore be significant. Findings Issues associated with the proposed Project on air quality are discussed in Section 3.4 of the EIR. The EIR concludes that implementation of the mitigation measures stated below would not reduce emissions during project operations to a less than significant impact under current standards. Despite implementation of the stated mitigation measures, significant and unavoidable impacts would remain. Consistent with the adopted policies and programs associated with the social benefits identified by the General Plan, including General Plan Policy 1.1.2, Program 1.1.2.2, Program 1.1.5.2, Program 1.2.1.2, Program 1.2.2.1, Program 1.2.1.2, Program 1.2.1.4, Program 1.2.2.2, and Program 1.2.2.3, the impact is overridden by the Project's benefits as set forth in the statement of overriding considerations. The following mitigation measures from the EIR are applicable and will mitigate these impacts to the extent feasible; however, air quality impacts associated with project operations would remain significant and unavoidable. Measure AIR -3a: Construct on-site or off-site bus turnouts, passenger benches, and shelters. Measure AIR -3b: Coordinate traffic lights on streets impacted by development. Measure AIR -3e: Set up resident worker training programs to improve job/housing balance. Air Quality Impact Impact AIR -6: Air pollutants emissions associated with the project would result in an adverse cumulative impact on air quality (Cumulative Construction Emissions). (Draft EIR, p. 3.4-18) Facts in Support of Finding A cumulative impact arises when two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant impacts, meaning that the project's incremental effects must be viewed in connection with the effects of past, current, and probable future projects. Notably, any project that would individually have a significant air quality impact would also be considered to have a significant cumulative impact. Construction Construction activity associated with other projects in the SCAB would generally involve the use of similar equipment and may overlap with the construction schedule of the project. Because Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 34 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission the project has a significant and unavoidable impact, the project would also have a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact. Operation SCAQMD's approach for assessing cumulative operational impacts is based on the SCAQMD's AQMP forecasts of attainment of ambient air quality standards in accordance with the requirements of the federal Clean Air Act (FCCA) and the California Clean Air Act (CCAA). This forecast also takes into account the Southern California Association of Government's (SCAG's) forecasted future regional growth. As such, the analysis of cumulative impacts (see Chapter 4 of the EIR) focuses on determining whether the project is consistent with forecasted future regional growth. As presented in Impact AIR -1, the project would be consistent with AQMP forecasts and would result in a less -than -significant cumulative impact. As discussed in Impact AIR -2, Project Toxic Air Contaminant (TAC) emissions would not have a significant impact on community health. However, cumulative sources from projects throughout the Basin would emit substantial amounts of TACs. The estimated carcinogenic risk in the Basin is currently about 1,400 per million people (SCAQMD, 2005a). The impact of TACs to community health within the Basin is a regional concern that has been addressed by the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD has published an Air Toxics Control Plan designed to limit TAC emissions in an equitable and cost-effective manner (SCAQMD, 2000b). In addition, the SCAQMD addressed health risk in the Basin and TAC emissions reduction measures in the 2007 AQMP. While the total TAC emissions from all projects in the region would be significant, the TAC emissions from the project are minimal for both construction and operations and would not be a cumulatively considerable contribution to the overall cumulative impact. Therefore the Project would have a less -than -significant cumulative impact with regard to TACs. Finding Issues associated with the proposed Project's impacts on air quality are discussed in Section 3.4 of the EIR. The EIR concludes that there are no feasible mitigation measures to reduce the significant and unavoidable impacts that would remain. Consistent with the adopted policies and programs associated with the social benefits identified by the General Plan, including General Plan Policy 1.1.2, Program 1.1.2.2, Program 1.1.5.2, Program 1.2.1.2, Program 1.2.2.1, Program 1.2.1.2, Program 1.2.1.4, Program 1.2.2.2, and Program 1.2.2.3, the impact is overridden by the Project's benefits as set forth in the statement of overriding considerations. Greenhouse Gases and Global Warming Impact Impact GHG-1: Construction and implementation of the project could result in a cumulatively considerable increase in greenhouse gas emissions. The project would not potentially conflict with the state goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in California to 1990 levels by 2020, as set forth by the timetable established in AB 32, California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. (Draft EIR, p. 3.5-12) Facts in Support of Finding The proposed Project would contribute to global climate change as a result of emissions of greenhouse gases, primarily CO2i emitted by construction and operational activities. Greenhouse gas impacts are considered to be exclusively cumulative impacts; there are no Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 35 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission non -cumulative greenhouse gas emissions impacts from a climate change perspective (CAPCOA, 2008). Thus, the analysis of greenhouse gas emissions is to determine whether the proposed project impact is cumulatively considerable. Four types of analyses are used to determine whether the proposed Specific Plan could be cumulatively considerable and potentially conflict with the state goals for reducing GHG emissions. The analyses are as follows: A. Any potential conflicts with the CARB's 39 recommended actions in California's AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan. B. The relative size of the project. The project's GHG emissions will be compared to the size of major facilities that are required to report GHG emissions (25,000 metric tons/year Of CO2e)1 to the State. The project size will also be compared to the SCAQMD GHG threshold, as well as the California GHG emissions limit of 427 million metric tons per year Of CO2e emissions by 2020. In reaching its goals, CARB will focus upon the largest emitters of GHG emissions. C. The basic energy efficiency parameters of a project to determine whether its design is inherently energy efficient. D. Any potential conflicts with applicable City plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHGs. With regard to Item A, the proposed Project does not pose any apparent conflict with the most recent list of the CARB early action strategies. With regard to Item B, the proposed Project's construction GHG emissions would be approximately 8,156 metric tons of CO2e/yr. The proposed Downey Specific Plan's operational GHG emissions at build -out from vehicle trips and space heating would be approximately 258,543 metric tons of CO2e/yr, indirect operation emissions from electricity generation would be approximately 17,226 metric tons of CO2e/yr, indirect operation emissions from the increase in water conveyance would be approximately 43,469 CO2e/yr, totaling 319,251 metric tons of CO2e/yr. The proposed Project would be classified as a major source of GHG emissions (total emissions would exceed the lower reporting limit, which is 25,000 metric tons of CO2e/yr). When compared to the overall state emissions limit of approximately 427 million metric tons CO2e/yr, the proposed Specific Plan at build -out (319,251 metric tons CO2e/yr) would be 0.07 percent of the state goal. However, since the project would result in GHG emissions that would exceed the major source threshold (25,000 metric tons CO2e/yr) and the SCAQMD GHG screening threshold (3,000 metric tons CO2e/yr), the Project would potentially conflict with the State's ability to meet the AB 32 goals. For GHG calculations see Appendix 6. As noted above, the 25,000 metric ton annual limit identifies the large stationary point sources in California that make up approximately 94 percent of the stationary emissions. If the project's total emissions are below this limit, its total emissions are equivalent in size to the smaller projects in California that as a group only make up 6 percent of all stationary emissions. It is assumed that the activities of these smaller projects would generally not conflict with State's ability to reach AB 32 overall goals. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 36 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission With regard to Item C, the Project would introduce high-density residential uses, thus creating a mixed-use environment in which residents would benefit from nearby shopping and employment opportunities, which would reduce the community's reliance on automobiles. With regard to Item D, the City does not have any plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs, therefore the Project would not pose a conflict. The review of Items A, B, C, and D indicate that the project would potentially conflict with the State goals in AB 32 and, therefore, this impact would be significant without mitigation. The State of California Attorney General's office has compiled a list of GHG reduction measures that could be applied to a diverse range of projects (State of California Department of Justice, 2008) where practicable; many of these measures are included in Mitigation Measure GHG-1, below. Findings Issues associated with greenhouse gas emissions are discussed in Section 3.5 of the EIR. The EIR concludes that implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1, below, to the extent feasible would not reduce greenhouse gases sufficiently to avoid potential conflicts with AB 32 goals. Consistent with the adopted policies and programs associated with the social benefits identified by the General Plan, including General Plan Policy 1.1.2, Program 1.1.2.2, Program 1.1.5.2, Program 1.2.1.2, Program 1.2.2.1, Program 1.2.1.2, Program 1.2.1.4, Program 1.2.2.2, and Program 1.2.2.3, the impact is overridden by the Project's benefits, as set forth in the statement of overriding considerations. Measure GHG-1: The applicant shall require implementation of all feasible energy efficiency and GHG reduction measures, including but not limited to the following where practicable: Energy Efficiency • Design buildings to be energy efficient. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Use daylight as an integral part of lighting systems in buildings. • Use trees, landscaping and sun screens on west and south exterior building walls to reduce energy use. • Install light colored "cool" roofs, cool pavements. • Provide information on energy management services for large energy users. • Install energy efficient heating and cooling systems, appliances and equipment, and control systems. • Install light emitting diodes (LEDs) for traffic, street and other outdoor lighting. • Limit the hours of operation of outdoor lighting. • Provide education on energy efficiency. Renewable Energy • Install solar and tankless hot water heaters, and energy-efficient heating ventilation and air conditioning. Educate consumers about existing incentives. • Install solar panels on non-residential carports and over parking areas. • Use combined heat and power in appropriate applications. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 37 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Water Conservation and Efficiency • Create water -efficient landscapes. • Install water -efficient irrigation systems and devices, such as soil moisture -based irrigation controls. • Use reclaimed water for landscape irrigation in new developments and on public property. Install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design buildings to be water -efficient. Install water -efficient fixtures and appliances. • Restrict watering methods (e.g., prohibit systems that apply water to non -vegetated surfaces) and control runoff. • Restrict the use of water for cleaning outdoor surfaces and vehicles. • Implement low -impact development practices that maintain the existing hydrologic character of the site to manage storm water and protect the environment. (Retaining storm water runoff on-site can drastically reduce the need for energy -intensive imported water at the site.) • Devise a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and location. The strategy may include many of the specific items listed above, plus other innovative measures that are appropriate to the specific project. • Provide education about water conservation and available programs and incentives. Solid Waste Measures • Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste (including, but not limited to, soil, vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard). • Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste and adequate recycling containers located in public areas. • Provide education and publicity about reducing waste and available recycling services. Land Use Measures • Include mixed-use, infill, and higher density in development projects to support the reduction of vehicle trips, promote alternatives to individual vehicle travel, and promote efficient delivery of services and goods. • Educate the public about the benefits of well-designed, higher density development. • Incorporate public transit into project design. • Preserve and create open space and parks. Preserve existing trees, and plant replacement trees at a set ratio. • Develop "brownfields" and other underused or defunct properties near existing public transportation and jobs. • Create travel routes that ensure that destinations may be reached conveniently by public transportation, bicycling or walking. Transportation and Motor Vehicles Limit idling time for commercial vehicles, including delivery and construction vehicles. • Promote ride sharing programs (e.g., by designating a certain percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles, designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride sharing vehicles, and providing a web site or message board for coordinating rides). • Encourage the development of facilities and infrastructure to encourage the use of low or zero -emission vehicles (e.g., electric vehicle charging facilities and conveniently located alternative fueling stations). Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 38 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission • Provide public transit incentives such as free or low-cost monthly transit passes. • Promote "least polluting" ways to connect people and goods to their destinations. Incorporate bicycle lanes and routes into street systems, new subdivisions, and large developments. • Incorporate bicycle -friendly intersections into street design. • For commercial projects, provide adequate bicycle parking near building entrances to promote cyclist safety, security, and convenience. For large employers, provide facilities that encourage bicycle commuting, including, e.g., locked bicycle storage or covered or indoor bicycle parking. • Create bicycle lanes and walking paths directed to the location of schools, parks and other destination points. • Institute a telecommute and/or flexible work hours program. Provide information, training, and incentives to encourage participation. Provide incentives for equipment purchases to allow high-quality teleconferences. • Provide information on all options for individuals and businesses to reduce transportation -related emissions. Provide education and information about public transportation. Noise Impact Impact NOI-4: The proposed Project, together with anticipated future development could result in long-term traffic increases that could cumulatively increase noise levels. (Draft EIR, p. 3.6- 15) Facts in Support of Finding When considered alone, the proposed Project would generate noise mainly by adding more traffic to the area. Other anticipated projects would contribute to noise in the area due to increased traffic volumes. Table 3.6-6 of the EIR shows the future cumulative traffic with the project and existing traffic with the project and the difference between the two. As depicted in Table 3.6-6 of the EIR, three out of eleven roadway segments would result in a significant increase in traffic noise from the proposed Project. Residences in the project area would be subject to Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, which requires an interior noise standard of DNL 45 dBA in any habitable room. Residences along roads exceeding 65 dBA would require sound -rated assemblies at the exterior facades of project buildings and insulation (multi -family). Although implementation of measures required by Title 24 and City requirements would reduce proposed residences' interior noise levels to conform to Title 24 standards, existing noise - sensitive receptors would still be affected, particularly at Intersection No. 2 (Paramount Boulevard south of Third Street). Therefore this impact is cumulatively considerable, and significant and unavoidable for Intersection No. 2 (Paramount Boulevard south of Third Street), which would affect existing residences west of Paramount Boulevard. Finding Issues associated with the proposed Project's contribution to cumulative noise impacts related to long-term traffic are discussed in Section 3.6 of the EIR. The EIR concludes that implementation of Title 24 and City requirements would not reduce cumulative impacts associated with noise for Intersection No. 2 (Paramount Boulevard south of Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 39 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Third Street). Consistent with the adopted policies and programs associated with the social benefits of the project identified by the General Plan, including General Plan Policy 1.1.2, Program 1.1.2.2, Program 1.1.5.2, Program 1.2.1.2, Program 1.2.2.1, Program 1.2.1.2, Program 1.2.1.4, Program 1.2.2.2, and Program 1.2.2.3, the impact is overridden by the Project's benefits as set forth in the statement of overriding considerations. Traffic and Circulation Impact Impact TRAF-1: The proposed Project could conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit. (Draft EIR, p. 3.3-20) Facts in Support of Finding For the Long Range with Currently Adopted General Plan scenario, all study area intersections would operate at or above LOS E with improvements during peak hour. Without improvements, all would fall below LOS E during the PM peak hour, and three intersections would fall below LOS E during the Ann peak hour. The improvements discussed in the General Plan would be sufficient to mitigate the increase in vehicular traffic that would occur as the General Plan approaches full build -out. See Table 3.3-5 of the EIR for intersection analysis for the long range General Plan conditions. General Plan conditions assume all project area roadways are built to their full classifications, a TSM program is implemented, and the intersection improvements outlined in the General Plan EIR have been developed. The proposed Specific Plan would increase the amount of retail, office, and other uses within the project area, but not by as much as the currently adopted General Plan. With improvements proposed by the Specific Plan, all study area intersections would perform at or above LOS E during peak hours. Without Specific Plan improvements, three intersections would fall below the standard set by the City during the PM peak hour. All intersections perform at the same LOS or better when comparing the proposed Specific Plan to the adopted General Plan. Still, three intersections would perform at LOS F without improvements. Improvements to these roadways, however, are not necessarily consistent with the overall goal of creating a vibrant, pedestrian- and bicycle -friendly downtown area. Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 would require the proposed Specific Plan to implement a program to monitor conditions at the three failing intersections and to fund alternative improvements, if necessary. Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 would require all new development to meet the City's LOS standard. The Downey Specific Plan area would not conflict with policy on congestion, mass transit, bicycle facilities, parking, or pedestrian facilities. The proposed Project is designed to promote alternative forms of transportation and be a walkable community. However, all development in the project area must conform to the City's traffic standards and intersections that are near capacity should be monitored throughout the implementation of the Specific Plan. Implementation of Mitigation Measures TRAF-1 and TRAF-2 would not, however, reduce impacts to a less -than -significant level under the cumulative scenario and the impacts on the Intersection of Paramount Boulevard at Firestone Boulevard and Downey Avenue at 2nd Street would remain significant and unavoidable as described in Appendix 5 of the EIR. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 40 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Finding Issues associated with the proposed Project's contribution to cumulative traffic impacts are discussed in Section 3.3 of the EIR. The EIR concludes that implementation of Mitigation Measures TRAF-1 through TRAF-5 would not entirely mitigate impacts to the intersection of Downey Avenue at 2nd Street nor for Paramount Boulevard at Firestone Boulevard (see Appendix 5 of the EIR). Consistent with the goals of this project, as well as the goals for Downtown provided in the adopted General Plan, the impact is overridden by the Project's benefits. Measure TRAF-1: The proposed Specific Plan shall implement a program for monitoring conditions at the following intersections: • Paramount Boulevard at Firestone Boulevard; Downey Avenue at 2nd Street; and Downey Avenue at Firestone Boulevard. Should conditions continue to deteriorate at these intersections, the program shall fund alternative improvements, such as Transportation Systems Management (traffic signal coordination, traffic incident management, etc.), Transportation Demand Management (ridesharing, transit information kiosks, etc.), or improvements to the infrastructure for alternative modes of transport (walking, bicycling, NEVs). Measure TRAF-2: All new development within the Specific Plan area shall be required to conform to the City's traffic standards. Measure TRAF-3: Third through lanes shall be established on northbound, southbound and eastbound approaches to the intersection of Paramount Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard. The through lanes will replace right turn lanes (either striped or de facto) in each case and will require eliminating parking on the departure legs of the intersection. Measure TRAF-4: Transportation Systems Management (traffic signal coordination, traffic incident management, etc.); Transportation Demand Management (ridesharing, transit information kiosks, etc., or improvements to the infrastructure for alternative modes of transport, such as walking, bicycling, neighborhood electric vehicles) shall be implemented for the intersection of Paramount Boulevard and Firestone Boulevard. Measure TRAF-5: A third eastbound through lane shall be added to the intersection of Downey Avenue at Firestone Boulevard, by eliminating parking during the PM peak hours. 8. FEASIBILITY OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVES Because the Project will potentially cause unavoidable, significant environmental effects, as outlined above, the City must consider the feasibility of any environmentally superior alternatives to the proposed Project. The City must evaluate whether one or more of these alternatives could avoid or substantially lessen the Project's unavoidable significant environmental effects (See Citizens for Quality Growth v. City of Mount Shasta [1988] 198 Cal.App.3d 433, 443-445 [243 Cal.Rptr. 727]; see also PRC § 21002.). In preparing and adopting findings, a Lead Agency need not necessarily address the feasibility Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 41 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission of both mitigation measures and environmentally superior alternatives when contemplating approval of a proposed project with significant impacts. When a significant impact can be mitigated to an acceptable level solely by the adoption of mitigation measures, the agency, in drafting its findings, has no obligation to consider the feasibility of environmentally superior alternatives, even if their impacts would be less severe than those of the proposed Project as mitigated (See Laurel Hills Homeowners Association v. City Council [1978] 83 Cal.App.3d 692, 730-731 [270 Cal.Rptr. 650]; and Laurel Heights Improvement Association v. Regents of the University of California [1988] 47 Cal.3d 376, 400-403 [253 Cal.Rptr. 426]). Accordingly, in adopting findings concerning project alternatives, the City considers only those environmental impacts that for the project are significant and cannot be avoided through mitigation. Chapter 6 of the Draft EIR examines three alternatives to the proposed Project to determine whether any of these alternatives could meet the Project's objectives, while avoiding or substantially lessening its significant, unavoidable impacts. The following three alternatives were examined: Alternative 1: No Project Alternative (No Build); Alternative 2: No Project Alternative (Build under the Existing Plan); and Alternative 3: 50 Percent Residental/50 Percent Commercial Alternative. These findings examine the alternatives to the extent they lessen or avoid the project's significant environmental effects. Although presented here and in the Draft EIR, the City is not required to consider those alternatives in terms of environmental impacts that are insignificant or avoided through mitigation. In addressing the No Project/No Project Alternative, the City followed the direction of the State CEQA Guidelines that: The no project analysis shall discuss the existing conditions, as well as what would be reasonably expected to occur in the foreseeable future if the project were not approved, based on current plans and consistent with available infrastructure and community services (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126[d][4]). 8.1 No Project Alternative (No Build) Description Section 15126.6(e) of the CEQA Guidelines requires the analyses of a "no project" alternative. This "no project" analysis must discuss the existing condition of the project site, as well as what would be reasonably expected to occur in the foreseeable future if the project were not to be approved. The "no project" alternative represents the status quo, or maintaining the project site in its current state. Under Alternative 1, no changes would be made to the Downtown Specific Plan area other than changes related to normal repairs and maintenance. Because no construction would occur, nothing would change. No new architectural elements would be added to the area, vacant buildings/boarded up buildings would remain vacant and boarded up, and no construction equipment or other signs of construction would be visible. No new environmental effects would directly result from the selection of this alternative. Maintenance of the project site in the present state would allow the site to continue in its current state. Because the site would not be developed, any significant and adverse environmental impacts directly or cumulatively associated with the proposed Project would be avoided. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 42 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Project Goals and Objectives The EIR includes the following goals and objectives in Chapter 2 (Project Description) • Provide an appropriate amount of land area to absorb the city's future population growth (see General Plan, Policy 1.1.2). • Promote housing projects and mixed-use projects that include housing within areas designated for the downtown area, transit -oriented developments, and areas in the vicinity of the Downey Landing Project (see General Plan, Program 1.1.2.2). • Promote Downtown Downey as a destination draw for entertainment and dining uses (see General Plan, Program 1.1.5.2). • Promote mixed-use developments with housing on the same site or in proximity to commercial services to reduce the need for trips by vehicles (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.2). • Develop the downtown area as a destination point for entertainment, dining, civic, and other activities (see General Plan, Program 1.2.2.1). • Capitalize on existing pedestrian traffic generated by the Downtown area by the movie theater, hotel, civic center and offices (see General Plan, Program 1.2.2.2). • Promote housing, mixed-use housing, and other land uses that will generate nighttime pedestrian traffic in the Downtown (see General Plan, Program 1.2.2.3). • Promote project designs that reduce dependency on vehicles and promote pedestrian, transit, and alternate modes of travel (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.1). • Promote mixed-use developments with housing on the same site or in proximity to commercial services to reduce the need for trips by vehicles (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.2). • Provide dining opportunities within walking distances of employment centers (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.4). • Promote Downtown Downey as an economic core creating new employment opportunities. • Strengthen pedestrian, bicycle, and transit -oriented characteristics while ensuring access for automobiles. • Preserve and enhance the unique character of existing structures. • Identify Downtown as a cultural center for Downey. Concentrate growth in Downtown while respecting and preserving surrounding residential neighborhoods. Respect the needs of existing landowners in the downtown and minimize the use of eminent domain in the downtown area. Attainment of Project Objectives This alternative would not meet the basic project objectives outlined above. Maintenance of current conditions would continue to detract from the creation of a vital 24-hour downtown that serves the City and enhances the City's economic base. In addition, no additional retail merchandise shopping opportunities would be created to serve the residents of Downey; the visual character of the site would not be enhanced; and businesses that generate positive net revenues for the community would not be attracted to the area. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 43 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission 8.2 No Project Alternative (Build under the Existing Plan) Description Under Alternative 2, or the No Project (Build) Alternative would continue existing policies and regulations for the Specific Plan area; and development would continue under existing regulations. The Downtown would continue to be defined by the Downtown Plan Overlay Zone and would not actively include the proposed Civic Center District nor parts of the proposed Paramount Boulevard Professional District. Portions of these areas would be subject to C -P, C- 1, C-2 and C-3 zoning. Some areas would be within the Downtown Plan Overlay Zone, which includes height restrictions and use restrictions. Attainment of Proiect Objectives This alternative would not meet the basic project objectives outlined above. Under Alternative 2, development would occur in conformance to existing General Plan land use designations and zoning, principally the Downtown Plan Overlay zone. The edges of the Specific Plan area are outside of the downtown zone and would instead be subject to a wide variety of uses, ranging from single-family housing to C-3 commercial zones. Because of the lack of a unified and far- reaching vision for the entire downtown area, and the continuation of existing uses for a longer period of time due to the slump in the housing market and the general economic slump, development is likely to take longer than 2025, the horizon year for Downey's General Plan. The lack of a unified vision for the Specific Plan area would conflict with the policies established by the General Plan for downtown and make development downtown (as currently delineated by the Downtown Plan Overlay and the Redevelopment Plan) more difficult. As a result, Alternative 2 would have a greater impact than the proposed Specific Plan. 8.3 50 Percent Residential/50 Percent Commercial Alternative Description Alternative 3 would split development in the Specific Plan area so that the 50 percent of development would be residential and 50 percent would be commercial. This approach establishes a goal of 1,423 net new dwelling units in Specific Plan area, and approximately 777,408 square feet of net new commercial space, for a total of 1,620 residential units and 2.6 million square feet of commercial space. Alternative 3 would result in a goal of 189 net new dwellings in the Paramount Boulevard Professional District, 80 net new dwelling units in the Downtown Residential District, 165 net new dwelling units in the Downtown Core, and 989 net new dwellings in the Firestone Boulevard District. Most of the commercial development would take place in the Firestone Boulevard Gateway District, where approximately 873,470 net new square feet, or approximately two-thirds of anticipated commercial development under Alternative 3, would be targeted. This would be the only change to the Specific plan. All other guidelines and requirements under the Specific Plan would remain the same, including design guidelines, proposed densities and floor -to -area ratios, and proposed building heights. Attainment of Project Objectives This alternative would occur in conformance to the Specific Plan. New development would focus on developing more residential uses and less commercial uses than the proposed Specific Plan. Impacts to the environment under Alternative 3 would result in a lower jobs -to - housing ratio than under the Specific Plan. Although not a significant impact, the result would be a need to balance the need for jobs against the need for additional residences. Because of the ongoing slump in housing prices, it may be difficult to line up substantial housing development. However, this would not necessarily be a significant environmental effect. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 44 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission 9. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS When a project results in significant unavoidable adverse effects, CEQA requires the decision- making body of the Lead Agency to balance the benefits of the project against its unavoidable adverse effects in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of the project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse effects may be considered "acceptable." CEQA requires the Lead Agency to state in writing specific responses to support its actions based on the Final EIR and/or information in the record. This written statement is known as the Statement of Overriding Considerations. Project -Specific Significant and Unavoidable Impacts The proposed Project would have the following significant unavoidable impacts: Air Quality, • Impact AIR -2: Project construction could violate air quality standards or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation during the short-term duration of construction. Impact AIR -3: Project operations could violate air quality standards or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation during long-term operations. • Impact AIR -6: Air pollutant emissions associated with the project would result in an adverse cumulative impact to air quality. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact GHG-1: Construction and implementation of the project could result in a cumulatively considerable increase in GHG emissions. The project would not potentially conflict with the state goal of reducing GHG emissions in California to 1990 levels by 2020, as set forth by the timetable established in AB 32, California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Noise Impact NOI-4: The proposed Project, together with anticipated future development could result in a long-term traffic increases that could cumulatively increase noise levels particularly at Intersection No. 2 (Paramount Boulevard south of Third Street). Traffic and Circulation Impact TRAF-1: The proposed Project could conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit. The City has adopted all feasible Mitigation Measures with respect to the unavoidable significant impacts identified above. Although these Mitigation Measures may lessen the impacts, they would not reduce the potential impacts to a level of insignificance. As a result, to approve the Project, the City must adopt a Statement of Overriding Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 45 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Considerations pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15043 and 15093. The Statement of Overriding Considerations merely allows a Lead Agency to cite a project's general economic, social, or other benefits as a justification for choosing to allow the occurrence of specified significant environmental effects that have not been at least substantially mitigated. The statement explains why, in the agency's judgement, the project's benefits outweigh its unavoidable significant effects. 10. INDEPENDENT REVIEW AND ANALYSIS Under CEQA, the Lead Agency must: (1) independently review and analyze the EIR; (2) circulate draft documents that reflect its independent judgment; and (3) as part of the certification of an EIR, find that the report or declaration reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. The City independently reviewed and analyzed the Draft EIR and determined that the Draft EIR reflects its independent judgment. Moreover, upon completing this review and making this determination, the City circulated the Draft EIR, as described above. With the adoption of these findings, the City concludes that the Draft EIR reflects its independent judgment. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 46 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Exhibit B STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS To the extent that the significant effects of the project are not avoided or substantially lessened to a less than significant level, the City, having reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR for the project (which includes the Draft EIR and Responses to Comments), and having reviewed and considered the information contained in the public record, and having balanced the benefits of the Project against the unavoidable effects which remain, finds such unmitigated effects to be acceptable in consideration of the following overriding considerations discussion (in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15093). The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures have been imposed to lessen project impacts to the greatest extent possible, and furthermore, that alternatives do not meet the complete objectives of the project, or do not provide the overall benefits of the project. The benefits of the proposed Project include, but are not limited to, the following. Project implementation will: • Provide an appropriate amount of land area to absorb the city's future population growth (see General Plan 1.1.2). • Promote housing projects and mixed-use projects that include housing within areas designated for the downtown area, transit -oriented developments, and areas in the vicinity of the Downey Downtown Specific Plan (see General Plan, Program 1.1.2.2). • Promote Downtown Downey as a destination draw for entertainment and dining uses (see General Plan, Program 1.1.5.2) • Promote mixed-use developments with housing on the same site or in proximity to commercial services to reduce the need for trips by vehicles (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.2). • Develop the downtown area as destination point for entertainment, dining, civic, and other activities (see General Plan, Program 1.2.2.1) • Capitalize on existing pedestrian traffic generated by the Downtown area by the movie theater, hotel, civic center and offices (see General Plan, Program 1.2.2.2). • Promote housing, mixed housing, and other land uses that will generate nighttime pedestrian traffic in the Downtown (see General Plan, Program 1.2.2.3). • Promote project designs that reduce dependency on vehicles and promote pedestrian transit, and alternate modes of travel (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.1). • Promote mixed-use developments with housing on the same site or in proximity to commercial services to reduce the need for trips by vehicles (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.1). • Provide dining opportunities within walking distances of employment centers (see General Plan, Program 1.2.1.4). • Promote Downtown Downey as an economic core creating new employment opportunities. • Strengthen pedestrian, bicycle, and transit -oriented characteristics while ensuring access for automobiles. • Preserve and enhance the unique character of existing structures. • Identify Downtown as a cultural center for Downey. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 47 Resolution No. 10-2664 Downey Planning Commission Concentrate growth in Downtown while respecting and preserving surrounding residential neighborhoods. Respect the needs of existing landowners in the downtown and minimize the use of eminent domain in the downtown area. Downtown Downey Specific Plan (PLN -10-08074) September 15, 2010 - Page 48 X Q O le a Z H 00 �a W m X z wQ c� z_ R O z 2 z O Q 0 C i O r U 'L L O U C " U d V C O c cn C N — L- O — C ' 0 U O C C c Q 33: c m'> HLi U caaaa_ cnw U N O O m C — a > O` c p .� o �� N mca `o N coc -0 o Q o=EcEUmc :tom a) -o�m C O Q� c a) m oQ > U O c0d (n IL ca 0) c cacic m_Q) Q .Q At CO O � O r> a) m CL 0 N N VV UO U�� a) d c ... OO C O QE co o c ? o E M'C O a U O CL U) 5 >,E > a= cn a> ItLU 0000x0 Q0 µ- t v rn a) o._r0 C_cni=,0 o v a) o Co -oma-0005-M�UCCU `� c a) -0 3 .r a) -0 a) a) ,- a) a) E -m 0 C= C m o > C cn M O •� U m J 0 > >O O O" J O- () Ca -o a) a) a a) C °� 0, .-: + O` E «, c co U o 00 Qma CL X Co o a a S E o a)LO crac)Ma a) m O M -C Z'', -E-- a) >i c U m a) j .Ni a) CO)E O of t0� a) > co a) 7 a) + .`= (n a) 'C a) .y m 0) ^. U .� N O c a) '0 a) C o H 0 C m c a) C +�' r u N a) a) 7 a) C > O Co O a) O a) -a O U U 0 -0.. o a) m a c 2 , a U) c a) °-- >. ca o `� 0 C) -0 U c o- -o U E 'v) m > U m E �. m c� O 'o C a m m L `.. a) 50w� ami O U a) Co "- +r °) Q- 0v U a) " O) "'' -C a) to "'' `� Q O CO) m m O p U o mm mom Cl) ocuC cn3mmNcmEU�c—Jao� �motS rn o N as cco,aomcacUor-oa)o,tsm 'Z G E m L >, a U O m a) m Cl) L U cn +, =� L O O N C� ,P � •_ N m m m� >, i O L c U) c�,_ -0 a) CL a M ami 0 a) a c�ca C q- O d o 0 c a) vi o aoi o a) ami C E 3 0 ami m m �iA a �� c.) QU�'U = cn 2 m o -C L) v O co O 0 v z O c �- m a- C) 00 = N aL6 3 ani 0 -CL () c U) O c 0 0 c 0 N O C, 0 C) m � C O c Z c _N 00- 7 N c US 3t w0 C O V d r-. rr '0 O 04 >c) �, C c0 C 0-_ >, N O C CL c6 O C a) 4- W C p U 0 n3 = o° (Da co °off a) E a) E �� c ° 4- ° o M rn av, i=LL i-.. ° co � �' °U-p¢U Via` a)a)a3ia) �. �. °� �a �p`a a O O v o Q- o O as (i-0 a d) -0 a Q � Q cn U) CU m U) m cca DI C C_ dC V 7 a c O Cl. c0 O a c 0 c c4 ° () Cl. a) - Q Y cn r- c't-, O n tf �C N NO m O a) [ ca O O C)0 U�:0 U�:0 3:00 U_ U_ O) U O) L B a c a c C a c 0 c a) E cca (D a E a) a E Y c co tf Q. U) >, " Q (p >, " a a •O Y c0 >, L- c- >, 0W L) i>. m m = vi> Co c 0 0)0 �� U0tf UVU�oU 3;� o U L cv m c CL a)U) N p O E C N i7i O 0 N >, C O U)N +L' cu (n L a) O Q C L E O) j C N V c 'O U U c C O -C U L O ch .. N c U) . -co)UJ �[ ~ Z �. L ~ N 0 m a) to `~ .� ca a) N C_ -0 �C m °C— ��a°0EC E c O LL L_ a) M p 2 � )U) CD �u-U'O� c E p> > �. U uS C m M ° U 3° H 0 a ca V C Q-00 c-.0 C .D��o'3cmQ c a .- O a) o p C >, Tc6 Ec-c�cm U a) m �+ 0 m E -t 0 O Ez- p O E�`c- O M E L c o a) co a) `� �- m "O cc O m c - m E dL cC v - cII (B cn O O O > Q O` M._ 0) y co > .-. c 7 p " m= O a) �L C O O N C �' N C C cyC L ` 4) Q 0 .- a. LL 0 N 0 m 0� E p O O p O cL E O s a) ca CO O C O co F-�(nnc� a U) - ._.� �'Oa0Nm -Tca) v ti 0 w 0 C) C:) LO LO J Q) c C CL cU � aO Up y_ N CL U T � 3 aEi o a 0 a) c: U) 0 c 3 0 0 4) v C m •CL O O V V 0 a) - m a) r V � N O N d �-. O O CL O O a) C r C a) •V E > H LL 3: c (D Q O U O Q 0 O" 0 cnY Iu a) C O > Q p O > a) v O Q Z () a 4) v C m •CL O O V V 0 a) - L a) o -C d �-. -0. L N _ O U () C O cn OO E Q � ) 2 � a) (D Q O U O Q 0 O" 0 cnY Iu a) c U_ u) > Q p O > a) QU�a3v�c a) U C O U U a) to C 9 C U) O .c v U U CD C _C C C •2 d C a c m '> a) a) a (uY (6 Q L L Ln C)�o U�oC�a mcncco 0 U C p CD 0 m U = C `� a) c O p C a) +• O cu .— c C _ U Q— U O O — = � L C >+L L E Q Q a) U cu > O cLu L .� cu i c C Cl) Y ,� ,� d cu In c o ami �a)c�LIIFL-+'O' Nrn.L-.+. a) N Y a) a) C U O)C�P C= DY N E40= LL C "U' a) O p E cu N O cu �� cu o cu M 3 a C m E c> o oo E2 c E � c(uu� a) o 0-0 i U a) a) L O-0 U cu cu N a) cu m j O =_ u) a) N L c C Q U ,� (u a) O O mU)�E0 oEnmsCOo �rncv�. mm o C Q Via)=�a)rna) 012 Y m C m O C C L N Z c •c rn O Q O O (D O O O 0 cnY Iu a) d CL :: c O LL 0) L a) () a `J N OO ' cu (n -t U) •C O c v O N .N T` Q Y fu CL D— U) -0 N �W 0 U3: U�oC) CL 0 U C p CD 0 m U = C `� a) c O p C a) +• O cu .— c C _ U Q— U O O — = � L C >+L L E Q Q a) U cu > O cLu L .� cu i c C Cl) Y ,� ,� d cu In c o ami �a)c�LIIFL-+'O' Nrn.L-.+. a) N Y a) a) C U O)C�P C= DY N E40= LL C "U' a) O p E cu N O cu �� cu o cu M 3 a C m E c> o oo E2 c E � c(uu� a) o 0-0 i U a) a) L O-0 U cu cu N a) cu m j O =_ u) a) N L c C Q U ,� (u a) O O mU)�E0 oEnmsCOo �rncv�. mm o C Q Via)=�a)rna) 012 Y m C m O C C L N C rn a)U) Q ._. Ucn (D O O O 0 cnY Iu a) v Q O LL 0) ( co U C d `J c F- cu co m Q CL c 0 d cu oO0)rn N > U) -0 a aa)) (6om IM °-D CD (n to 0)mc�0 — :3 C O(O Ep L '�:3 'E 0 c L 7 U a) m CCU d E Z c .2) -O L rT N c (� O p L O O 1 IL r cu U N Iu o a) U >, i3 = ooQ'�cc� �0 corm � i cu o.c 0 U C p CD 0 m U = C `� a) c O p C a) +• O cu .— c C _ U Q— U O O — = � L C >+L L E Q Q a) U cu > O cLu L .� cu i c C Cl) Y ,� ,� d cu In c o ami �a)c�LIIFL-+'O' Nrn.L-.+. a) N Y a) a) C U O)C�P C= DY N E40= LL C "U' a) O p E cu N O cu �� cu o cu M 3 a C m E c> o oo E2 c E � c(uu� a) o 0-0 i U a) a) L O-0 U cu cu N a) cu m j O =_ u) a) N L c C Q U ,� (u a) O O mU)�E0 oEnmsCOo �rncv�. mm o C Q 012 Y m C m O k- O O OQ Q L �' LL rn a)U) c` (D O O O U) L — LL 0) ( co O L C d `J > F- -0 Q CL c a) d .r :3 O N > U) -0 a aa)) (6om IM °-D Cu o C CCD : =$ U L _A C U w c �-0 a)- F- > a) 0) N 4-- CL E N Z, cu . ,-. E Cy M L L Q 2 c) Q a ti O O O i O � Z � C a Iu i CL O 00 '~ N a r U) a� a) � o 2 0 a) m c cn 0 C 3 O 0 c � v ± 4) > � 0 © 0 § ? � � 2 2 \0 2 E c U) � P LL S O: 2 0 � $ � � \0 � � a c 2�.� 0 w ©�B Cu CLCLCL 2 c « ca) ■ m 06££ •n o S '> 4S c 6 @� § g VCY E Rk.0a« V S m 3 a_ 0� _.. (D 2 (D C 0 § Cl. c 0 �w «D k c � -0 � C: � � � CU / � c o q % \ 2. q o R •� o C) cu T3 �� CO L- E 0 E a 2 m 2 �2� %� �v� �g v a� R v2■��-3 c O@ R £ 0 x c % o■ k 7« 0 cn 2 @ 2: � g � @ @ 2 — 2 5 — + \ UC0§ k 66C�2�§/ �� 2 222§©2�0 U) o . . , ? £ E E 2 m % � � » 3 f > 3£ E _w / k 7@ 2 0% �_ «�§ m r 2 \ ° § ° . — @ § 0 -CL 2 0 / £ @ 6 2 § k « @ E > U ■ c m g @ a @ 0 3>' (D2 C R c o E 2$ k� k E 7& c 2 2 E§ E $ 2 2 2 o z \ c \ « 2 @ ' E E / (\ 2 @ $ §� v� 2 a § f §CL k �.� c £ 7 / 4 A § \ / cL 2 O / § 7 �E E ) t @ o Q R �. a : @@cn Co-■ a o m 5 c - F p m_0> 0- o ■ P ■ Q E Q-0 m m■ E o a �» — o© c@®_ ■ E a @ IT W 6 CN a ƒ3 � 2«Ecu_0@2w LL: �� \ / _b / §\ Eo /k CD L6 U� �■ 0 C 2 U c@ / 0 2 c 0 � 2 :t d 0 0 n Q. c o E CL > . 7 (Dk CL 2-0CL E ■ �0U) 0S k �§2f cu � o . � � g ■ P LL Z k.$ -,o\ 0 0 n Q. c o E CL > . 7 0 CL 2-0CL E ■ % CU 0 k 6 n .0 '2 v E � ■ 6O CL �R E ■ J « d/U) 0S 0 n E 0 o 0 0 c�-0 k � a) k 2/ ° o$ 0 �\ %— £ 2 m 0 CL c��� E 2 ®ƒ 2 2 6 D D — C� mx- �E �ƒ C: £ % � ® �� J / m C � / o _k 2 cn CU § k o£® k cn . / c o k 0§ / cn E . o ■ 2 §� - cn � \ « / v k� § 7§2 �� �k §ƒ §�� L--0 0> Lo 9 Q m �: S �« g° ca (D �' cu o@ o c 2 0� 7 k 0 0-0 k § >� CU ® /\ 2� �Q Q c m ¢ 2 § g w o 7ƒ& k a) q §ƒ 0 « 3 E= 4) k- ƒ S•E /.E f 2 2 p 2 \ 2 (D c CL 0 § o c: £ : E @ « 2 a m � 2 ° £ @ C: » 0 2>� 0� 0 \� k\ k > CO k C�0 ��-0@2k 6 g 6 w LL D@Q0 c U) E ® . 0 - •� o � . cn (D 0 0 0 o20 _ ■ @ U) m 0 �25U) 2 M.§ 2\ /5/E c O U) E NO ,U o rn r' c Oc Z c Co C d O 7 N w0 C O N V � U .CD 0 C L U m O O A U C O w C O — C : m O = C O U m e U co d m CL U ` O n C �� C "C (D C: c- •C c oEo '�- E C N 'C C H LL Q m CO 7 .0 "O p U a) m (n �' co Q .cn in 7 a 0 U a) a) ,O FL m N Q (D Y Cfn O N O m m O v t O Q O QC)( U V O a) C Q V j N V C Q� (n m m c-0 m a 06 od c o C m •n C > C. v C O E d "� C) to O t v0- D m ,� C ca C 00 m(n m(nW0 d M co N N H) N N CL V a) .2-5 Nom. Q> Q> GC w' QD ¢0 L O C p ) O ~= a)NUL ma) Up U L-0 p O c � ..� Y 0cn m p m c O - CL Q ON c OOp o C a�)o �o`ovioc`acrna "--3 Ea> ��Cacm >, �'�;mmo�c U N- ` O a) C O a) O ._. N '� a) C ca p 0-0 b � "- cu 0` CL °'cncs ta)� o` •� a) >.co CU c0 cnmU)C m�MM oL ov ` a) > m- a)0a)o a CL a) CL > m C C in `� m d a) E N cn �0 � .0 7 E a O p ` O O U 0) 75a) cm C a) �O 0 N O CD ` N V p L N N V .�+ N ;G as Q_r > a o c c� �•` � - Ca O C)a� m -0a) a) O Cl) 0m m p `i Q� o a)p p .(on. N Cc O m ca Oa O cu (1) C • a cn QO(A E p C o '�O a) ma sL- ) C" -Q U) :a 0o� cn oma) N O � NmC O a)am0n�r N aO ° a) (D cLo m` in o� E >E w 00 2 20-CC03a)a)2o- E"0 O aD O C) z U -)Z J a) Ia Ca c� as _U C=) CL U N a U o m O Q' m c cn 3 O 3 O c 0 ca v w O U c o -0 O) o (D .� V) U) F— LL 7 O U o a) U) CO Q. n O Q O J O C 0 m � U 'o � L Y b c () C: � ` c o 7 3 (D E 3 > a) c rn� O a) 0 a) v a) p O 0-2 c CCL �o �a)2c—Cu a>>rnaccuu0E of a (n cu o_ N U _0 7 0 o g 0) •� C u E a) cn 0) O C O c p E C d C •� O vo•-cn2.-cn C •� O O Ca)o >_ c) > U a) N 0 t V V 7 m c a) m(Dw w a) u100 a� a) d a) a) O U U CL a) _V U) Q> - W Q Q o Q o O C M cn > L- 0 N 0 O N N U � :� a) -0 C Rf cu O O LB U c cu -Z- U L- v� rn C c cua) C O v 0 D) a) Q 'O a) "-' C C MEG O O U N cn C9 .0 O= U +O� C C t O "'' 0 U CO 0 Q L cu U cu m 'C U U o rn 7 c0�o C U CCD D- m -C � O O m C 0— o (u O m C O '- C .-. p O NN cn C -0 -C .. �, U) L L C .0 Y U E U c t M 2 c y vii N-0 co co �aaCi�'0 cuaa))�o-C OCN C)m'w Cl* c O ca C9 C c O O 7 �- ,�- O M cn C a p .N > v) > co a) cu O a) c u) c a v) C �4U—_� �a >_ ca cU �� 3 mL- m �E 4) °0 CM C a C O c p ' U U vi v, — t OL N vi a) N U L> vJ OL .0 cu> O V a) U S a) O c m U °(D O 0 M Y 4) Lo 0 !C N C cu(n Q o¢ a cm Q U o o ui 0) 2 0-0 a') 2�-v 2 3. a30 ti O co O O U.) U.) J a) a � cu Ca m ao U p '= N a� a) 3 a�) 0 -CL D a) c cn 0 c 0 0 >+ Nv rnN �'p M m C - - 7 U c 0 �c 0 c� v O C O p O C •� cr C N err N N m L Q. 0 ` n V H W 0) " C O .S -0 Q C >+ c v � Y 7 U c 0 3 m eco>�c •U v O ca ` 5- (LD L Qp m N Q O U C .Q O) C Y c_ �, •C O C •- E G1 ++ N C .N O t ,a O N m .> 0U mc)n.0 c_0 ca c FL m O M 00 (n as C O �1 Q i+ •U U N i+ ` 5- (LD L Qp W W Q o Q O >, C-0 >, c)) 4- c L N >, (D 0) N In " %- T +. c 0) o O D) c O p+ U m C O E N p O O U C 7 E-0 C p) co -0 U) N � 0 0 CO c ul fl CL N a= m O_ ui c- ui C N` L •- U "O -p ;_, N ul E -a C N L m a)A c ca -0 C M .5 0) C N ^p C p �' m -p O) � N C Y N cn ca - U O ca c c Oa- O c N F'- a)= L a) co 0 N C rr m c U •U E m .`-. � c �. G1 p> a U N O c c U N 3 O 1 p u) O p 'p co E mO St v rn- m U) -0 3 rn o N m v� c °� L N U N j� C C m O m c C O +• E >, �` Q1 U G1 o� 1a _0 C 73 an d "� N U +J (D c U p ", ui m N E N p O C o. d N m c.3 .v L cn O'S N" c N N c.� rnL N W m E 0 E — c rn >, ui L S '— rno - - o- o_ d o a O ` n o W c c m a) CO o >+ 0 AD— D a> >, a� o o — N o o c m co a'i ei'�oo,a�v���vofa�2o�NooccaON-o_° �w�E° mN 75 C m .0 m 0 0 c N m N U C C C O c C c C >, c J O .- O C C cn 3 O L S a) C m m _ cn O O- U I a)- ca m cA - O J O 0_ N • M a 0 u) O E W• • • a • • • e o O co 0 0 -(0 Lo J N a� Ca m a. c) U p U N N Ln CL N � 3 ani o a D � 3� 0 C O 0 c 0 in �E N0 ,U o rn p 'c Z c m c a n a) c 3 �0 c O r v .` m a) Cl) o ' a) V L N c — d rn m 2 a) CO C: C •E O cCO > Oro 0)2 C: c c � (6 U) L C L O cna `-(D O .0 L Q c L- >+ U) O L C -a "0 Q 0 O + r 3r.C C .m o3.2a)-0 a m (a O C O U_ �` NL O> C Oa) a) +�= m M U L O _ a) a) a) O m U C c V) O O a) U m O O m U a) 'U O C 'm a?. 3 m (`p rnU L 0) L 1J °. E o co) m E Q co) o o w m a U 06 :5 c O a) O CL 4-i c 'rn c '— — C C E 3 0 C • O m N 5; o a. -a o Ca U) >,a0)0) c c cL E "0 ccnc O m 0 o3.2a)-0 a) -a)v a) c o -a c o) m N m U O> C Oa) C m (D N ,- a) � a c a O a) +. m C: C -'x 3 U (`p rnU L 0) QO (a 3 '^ ` a) n (n. :�• vno cn -a oc m (n c «� m 3c cML- O `� (D LL L w (� 0 m U cc +- N mo 0 m 3 .-. ca) vi - Sa) 3v°)•.� oo) m > �o a) �-»� a a) U Uo) ° a) c m cn c-0 m mO CL ami0 0a>im ��� -am(ca� a—m -v a)� o vi me a- L— a) o __� a)�'Q�O o v) 7 0 ` .C-. p m m o "a a) m C ` C� E` m m c m C N T3 c Q .0 1.. m 0) 0) � a 0)-C o � � � O V a) m m cn m � c a) � � �— � 3 >,� a) °c o o L U a) a) m m E .ca >, a�'i Q O o O C m w " gym- O CL �.� .; .+ I .. a; (n 0(� mCc a '0 sc U�U) . rm O uQ O — a) . O a) () ac)O U) -a a UO 5Uan W e o . 0 d rl- C) 00 O C) J N m c a (o Fl CD U p �'= N CL r U) > a) 0- a a) C U) 3 0 c 3 0 0 C O ea V (D 0) () C L _ (Q V � C C � N co � a) • O N N H LL O m Q .0 � Y U 0 O C L C r_ O O U CO U E a) C O (n E a) (B (D •�-• a) 7 cu C NQ •` L C` `v aaQUU .0 (a O -a (n C Co -s ( cu od CY O O .aY rn E C >,Ur - V � = M a) — O C O m 7 N V V _ m(na0.- a) d > Z C c Q. U — c CLO W Q a) a) E c `p N N D a) a) u) � U � a) C Oj C 'O 0 "O w e Q oca o�"-ca c"a•�—�°H a�0 MM ��0� (D -0 E oCU � ami3 3a�o a 3:= `�:° �w 4) a) a) U) a? a) a)� c a) Q.- 0-.— c > �' : N c 0) 0 o0�poC CM camNa) O 0 o�.�a) o (C C O rr E L a) p C a) N O c9 a) C 0-0 N i QnN�o a)' C C:3 (a ?E� oCv 30(av�� U (o (1) N 1) (C > C C •� > a) C 0-0 d CO O O 5 4) O ., a) v- +% C N C— O U U1 U C a) •� O E> (a C C N D N O C L O 4 C 7 p' ((f a- 'D O (0 �°)"��f°a)�>��ai E >i c ca-2°E�Oco M Q a);,��; (U c0E N w �3 O O N a) E Q c� c (o >, (n a) Z a) rn � � Q t a) Z E (a (L) .r �, a) m c (v •++ U a) N E O L a) U U):) U ca O a) co C � c (� U C1 N N c6 L O C N C 5 O C0 Q N O` L- 0 'a O C M O N C >--oEUU)a)3LDa)mO0'.-U) E 0� nocaadU .L.. o�caoUU�(nrn`a 7 0 co O O CO Ln z a) a ca �a c0 � a O U C) U N O L(') CL r U T D C E O Q) OL () c U) 0 C: 0 0 c a) 0 � C Q U U r ca CL N Q Q Q Q O Q0 w •L m _ CU CL c rn - L- : 0) F- LL a) a) w CO CL. N 5 L m U C 'o O (a C c C cu (n >, a) U N (o V a) () CU C.) ani m a) ai (a N � L L N^ L C 0 U 0 0 a) U Q O) U a) 0 L V w C _C O +. 0O Q� a) =5 2 0o a)��vccoa)c��ooa`))� �E��(aa CL E0 Om Ha d v C .a Y E m V V i 3 N m d E U a C a) p) C E 0) C 0 (n C 0 C. .� " Q c .N m ,>_ 0 a) m a) � C Q U U CL N Q Q Q Q O Q0 'O "-' c a) a) *' a) O a) O) "' to U a) 'O U �- +_ C L C C c O ,- C L (D .. U C C a) N gy p• O U co � () N a) +, O V a) .. L c O a) L L 0 L L N — o p; O j .� N X U p Q Q cu a 0 a) p N ;,_ a) Q N O O N C 0 0 c O c co U N E C> cu L c (D Q (0 d (Q (6 a) N �. N> p p V �, N N C C N N Ncm 0) C .0- p E N= N C U N .• - 0 0)-- N L L U. N Q) O Z a) 0 QC Ud a� 3�.X c� Co E 0-0U a).xcUna)-0w-C3� me CO a)E000 �U,>,o N 3 a) O U N N 0. O a) p Y C w "p N C C N O L > (B N CL a) a-. C N�` U> N a) CU� A Q Q) d O` Q (D C N a >O 0cu 0 (B 'a '� N U Q) a) N> '� c c U N 'O N aNi > c c a0i n C c x L> fa ..- _' N N 'O N a) c 2 a) a) C a) N" a) O N N (a (a (o 0-a) c O O (a b y W L -0 C Q.. c� + C, r J Q E• r • • a • L- 0 0 2 C R v O 00 O , 0 -m Ln z� a m (o �a ca , FL c) Up U N Q T �toW o � OL a� c (n 3 0 c O 0 k � 7 § /0 k §� £ � / c 0 m 2 � � � � 0 0 = $ 0 D «2gce- od .0 § c Dp E ■ E 002 u •- o C m cu =3 a) UQmu)a.O ■ � ■ c 0 CL ■ ■ � 22 [ƒ E2/2\ 22§22/ �� 32 2§% 2d } @ D)o$ 2 m 2.£ m% W '> c >, m km -0 .4 k§ E � k� •� 2 § 2 ° ° / � 0 2 \ E 0k 22 (§_0a§�-�@ « /� co cou� Q o o 0 2 2 0 o o 2 0 C_ m L) cii E c w @ E% Co o� a 5 E m■ r•, G 22�� %7§.--2 @( k §k cu ® cnCL@ �.C: £ @.g c E ._ ■ g o o . ¢ 0 - £ U) cL £ @ -0 o � Ems.@ o [ � % e � § 2 2 @ 2 2 @ / 0) �: o « a o � : _ CM k 0 2 2@ E 2\\(D% f% f� 2 k& 2 R� 2 0 � ±) @ q w\±� 3 m 2: � 7■ 7 o °� k m■ «)§ k 0 / 2 • ■ o E £ 2 : 2 =3 ■ 2 0 @ � m: � @ 0 2 k� k 0 @/ 2 ■� % S 3 S: // 3 7 § [: o R 2% G a 7 %§ CL 2 2\ 2 2 w k§§% S� CL 0 2 CL S § J-0� 2 - - 0 - 0 ® - 10 L / �2 q- ƒ %/ Eo f\ CD Uf t2 0- O ƒ cm § \ 3 c O CD O ,U o 0) r' c 0 Z C (U C: a 7 s � c w 0 C O 'M R V d N c O v C C O U rte-. U 0) H IL C 0 p O .S -0 0 7 E U) o C 0 Co .N V `! r_ N a) _r_ C r0�-. N V E 0p C .� O a� wcanum C c 0 (6 (0 Q Y C O 0t «-..>_ V C) U D U a� Q) d N N N C0 C C cu cu N 4.4 Q Q. W oo p� o E a) Q O Q — 0 c O rn� +� C c Y c (0 f� a) (`0 p c— O N o c� (0 �-0 o (n•- 'p -0 E (II 7 U p c c (0 .� p N c � 7 c N Q CO O 0 O Q , 0 O— c ` CL E N tz CL i4µ) O O �'� C c CU o N 0 7` cu U N c p O (OA C .r U `� (O cn U N p LL ,� U) O� coN-C (o E` E +. O N �� O O p 0 '~ -0 O-0 p p a) O 0 0 w (O C N i N a) 0 0 a U N c 0� E O O O C p- N c a) p Q O N N O O -0 p p gyp— a�rn(�mNavinp°=�cE -a�E(nm2 a�oE�c c a3 O�� >,L) O o o c 0 �,`0 Mia O w X a) E� a3NEw0 coi 0 0L o m3.S(n0E� 4c -0 a °7z cm_ cu(D U > co0 �pN O C: >, S O () O N-0 N N a) a) Q'� U O a) C a) O m O cL d �O a .E d R 0cn > O j (0 U N p .0--' > C N Vf 7 (a a) ., (`6 +- 7 7 >, O E C O U (�0 U N N LO O) `O 0 E C L .N !N4 a 7 E .O -0 0 0 0 a) N� U Q W -0 � a Q�� � a) . + p d p 0 O (o `O d s • Z2Q N Q.(n CL O 00 O i O � J a) CD (d cd (a d O U C) U N a L c TO c 0— U) :(A 0 c O 0 c 0 0 C, U O O c p 'c Z C 0 7 N c w0 c O ea v w •L a) -0 O N a) a) O a) a) O E v.` Ec`a.` c ��`m , O O O _0 0O O C 0 c tm d U 7 0a) a) rr 7-C N U O O L O U 7 0 O:. cn c cn a) C N +. N E O N E O --5 O C O O E .N rd. CO Q C Cl) O O +' 7 a) Cl) O +• O a) 0 o C Q O N N a) C H LL U O U UQW- � c .0 m E a o Q a (U -0 L.a) O O O O c Y Y c Y Y _ 'p N •— a U U U _0 U V O O 7 L :3 Q c0 m U 06 m U m -C7 U m U m 06 O 06 0 0 o c o_ v U c �n toto (U a .QO C a) O 0 O o C C O o Y O ` C� C� O C O C� a) •U o O O N c •N o Vv 0w mcn min U0 a0min as 'i a aa) i a aa) Z D 0 N c C C C C 0 fl-a� Q0 Q0 Q0 4):r m c Q QQ CL CL CL CLQQ W o Q o Q o Q o Q o -0 c >> c L- v aD CO �- CO -- -- -O •-' Q c cn N cn o o O— >+ o c Z c o O,� - u�= � o0 c app—' 0 u�� c=� a ca co �Q �0 —cn"'�Eca �a moa) 0) arc a) :3 o co L) caca>0rna'i�Z'0ca C 00 -E U (B C O C O C Q C N O N 0 f� O E. L _ C "O Q W 'O m "= c 30 0 o f cn �'��� 0 c �'o c 0 E 3 c °) v cn v o rn` �. c CO C s c o v7 U o �� 0 0 Q o i� ca o ai X CO o �' idQ"- `o L 0` - j Q C >, N= >% cn rte+ O _ V M CL y 0.0 U 4_ U C (D 3 O .0 0 o a) N �= Q t U- >> O a) N N-0— Q N+ N O �_ t 0 �_ Q �_ U o U= E v O— E 7 U Z N c N fCL o v O �' � O—� O _ cam E c° o ca o O °}. c � �� ami o p 0 Z},E Zcu� Z�, �N(Di>,�c>+c o0orn >,� C O c d N cm 0 O p d ca Q w N> E C N �, )cn 0 c O Q O c L Q� +, O U a� m o CL C °� 0 0 0 cx O Q N Q N .� N N C O N E cUn a O (T y o U) d Q O FM 3 co D 0 L) 4) °� va a� O cn cn caves o CL �c 0 m — x E ca m a� — m °) o a a� � a) � cu ° v O 0o 0 0 � N CD Z a) a� c d m dC) UC) N aLo a N (D c a3 0 CL a) 3U) 0 C 3 0 0 C O U) E NO ,U O r � Ci z= N A a s � c u� 0 0 C H LL "- C O a) CD (D cn_ a) 3 cmc _ E o 'o Q- E O ypU). E M Q- E- a) N 70 oLMca � *_ N E— a) cm Q" N N C cm a)oE� C (� (D L O M U L O) (a `O C C N fa C U a) m C C O U '� N O C a) ca U W.S.- O L Ea -a UW.E O m� E� ca m ca Q L N a1 C Q L ca "- C O a)3 c `= CD 4--C O a) 3 cmc O o 'o Q- > O ypU). `= (D . C M Q- c ; ocmma>i +• = ry 2 >,= oLMca � *_ 0) C E— C cm U 'a) N C cm a)oE� C C Y a)0E� U U C Y 7 (n O C U .N N fa C U a) m O� N c O U '� N O C a) ca U W.S.- O L Ea -a UW.E O m� E� ca O L -a U '— c 0 3 cm c 0 0 :L' M C: cu > a o 0) c`aE0 cm �- cn S �c W.E:E Ea (CC =03 U a) (L) (n (1) L N CD 5 C m > C a) C 70 2 >,= (a 0) C E— C .� fq C .— U 'a) N C C c O a)C L- a) U '— c 0 3 cm c 0 0 :L' M C: cu > a o 0) c`aE0 cm �- cn S �c W.E:E Ea (CC =03 U N N O 2 cn V o l t a) a) (L) (n (1) L N O 'V .-— O 5 z m > aa)) a) aa)) 70 2 >,= 0 0 E— 0 N U 'a) C C C c O a)C L- a) U U U N U Q. �+ (`n co C N v L a) 4-- O O O �L=3CcmO O m� CL N cn CL a1 C co) Q0- Q0- Q O � ca Q iQ W N O Q O ca Q o N N O 2 cn V o l t a) a) (L) (n (1) L N O 'V .-— O O L .L+ (a a) o > L C O E "a- U O 2 >,= ` > m o����ai3EUaa))aa)) c0(' E— caL U 'a) O a)-0" N •N N cu �>—.cn0-a)., _ yp -0 O a)C L- a) �UN�E ° ca c: U N N N (a C m (`n co C N v L a) 4-- O O O �L=3CcmO O m� �,¢� N cn N a)� C~ co) aa) •U O � ca -v a) `�c`a=� N Zv)—M ca O O C C V N 0 0) 41 � C p C O a) 7 0. a) N N (a c N O i5 3. O a) a) cn O O N v_) O O C O N O O a) .L-. LZ C C ca .O r ca a) a) L O a) (L) (n (1) L N O L .L+ 4- O C co(a N L a) C O (Q (a �, cn o����ai3EUaa))aa)) c0(' U 'a) O a)-0" N •N N cu "0 N 0) _ yp -0 O a)C L- a) ca c: O zch a) � N cn L A (aE -Com=�0m33 •U fa .0 •U '� N Na�OiSE )E0 M E.9 (D U (a EO N _� O 2 ca O 5-2 D U-0 a fl N V t N N El c N 0) CU N a N X U a) Ua) L LQ C_ C EL a)V- -C0 ui Q(ate' U� C 3 L U)C N N a) N C d�0-o0 O a) L- QD v ti 0 co O O (D J a) aM C a (a � � O U 0 U N Q � N -0 a) a� E 0 a) o a a) c (n 3 0 c 3 0 0 C 0 3:0E 1 C O U" O O O o C U C (u � O (O U E m 3(u�cu>,(DD-cu O a) v a) •U N Q a) U ���wO�EUcw'3ca .+ tUU) oO-(nC 0.2C (a 'p L- -0 N C AL CU(1) p 0 0 U U a) . — C M- C J_O Z C O-0 0 0 N T 0 a) U U O "0 m 'i3 v a c N C(D E O + O L U M (U j O V U) •C U cts O❑(a LpUU ' NUN U >,. () cn �U)a23aa))mn�nc O (D U O 4)L aV—EUa) O 0 O f6 co 6 .. _'� Op0O � a) 7 .r c 0 � 0 �0 U tt7 � = U cn v N (A o Q ID U a) n3 CO ' 2Ea) Q ED—E O nE O O 0 0 N a) F- LL cn 0- r :� o m U Q.cn m Q.Cn C 0 3:0E 1 C O U" O O O o C U C (u � O (O U E m 3(u�cu>,(DD-cu O a) v a) •U N Q a) U ���wO�EUcw'3ca .+ tUU) oO-(nC 0.2C (a 'p L- -0 N C AL CU(1) p 0 0 U U a) . — C M- C J_O Z C O-0 0 0 N T 0 a) U U O "0 m 'i3 v a c N C(D E O + O L U M (U j O V U) •C U cts O❑(a LpUU ' NUN U >,. () cn �U)a23aa))mn�nc O (D U O 4)L aV—EUa) O 0 O f6 co 6 .. _'� Op0O O.O a) 7 .r • V OC O �0 U tt7 >p 0Q C U p O (D cn v N (A o Q U a) n3 CO N Q ED—E O nE 3� a) mono- cn 0- r :� o L- o C �+ �"� �C U :00-0 0 3 0 =3 (D co 0 O o 0� C N "a � 0 0 0 L) a) Q a) V o� ¢� p p p Lu C V a) a) 0 F 9 E U� ca tea) C 4- E a) a) C E >, -C -C '� (n p a) U U C O U 0a U C >1m U N E.� a °a) c +. U` C °�Q-� o.E v � 0 Ea Y 0 � c = 3 �M c ._. (a c c ��U 0 0 c� (1) .0 cn �o 0 V 4)o��'c ��'v�� o ° (a a oa)a) Na)c °� o= ° (v -E g ao U C III U p C O a �N QY U •� O O a� V(a> 0 - CL a) d> a) a) > U) 0 0 N C c c 3 a O U) a a e W LU Q ¢ O Q ¢ o C 0 3:0E 1 C O U" O O O o C U C (u � O (O U E m 3(u�cu>,(DD-cu O a) v a) •U N Q a) U ���wO�EUcw'3ca .+ tUU) oO-(nC 0.2C (a 'p L- -0 N C AL CU(1) p 0 0 U U a) . — C M- C J_O Z C O-0 0 0 N T 0 a) U U O "0 m 'i3 v a c N C(D E O + O L U M (U j O V U) •C U cts O❑(a LpUU ' NUN U >,. () cn �U)a23aa))mn�nc O C � C' aV—EUa) O 0 O 6 .. _'� Op0O LU NC -C � OQ OC O O tt7 >p 0Q v N (A o 'O (D E 3 46 UQ v D) -D O O` r N � '��' a) � cn 0- r :� o c N N O O N C CL o O L N 3y E:. Nt oa)o� :00-0 0 3 �, �(arn•-v�U �_a ° E d is mac= o 0� 0r UE a�'i c aX) a) 0 C v CD N L M O C V a) a) N "O Op a) ,E O O— C U a `) p C O C 4- E a) a) C E >, -C -C '� (n p a) U U C O U 0a U C >1m U N E.� a °a) a) +. U` C °�Q-� o.E v � 0 Ea cn °) 0 � c = 3 0v E (a c ._. (a c c ��U 0 0 c� (1) .0 cn �o 0 V 4)o��'c ��'v�� o ° (a a oa)a) Na)c °� o= ° (v -E C 0 3:0E 1 C O U" O O O o C U C (u � O (O U E m 3(u�cu>,(DD-cu O a) v a) •U N Q a) U ���wO�EUcw'3ca .+ tUU) oO-(nC 0.2C (a 'p L- -0 N C AL CU(1) p 0 0 U U a) . — C M- C J_O Z C O-0 0 0 N T 0 a) U U O "0 m 'i3 v a c N C(D E O + O L U M (U j O V U) •C U cts O❑(a LpUU ' NUN U >,. () cn �U)a23aa))mn�nc c O .0 E N0 ,U C) c p C Z c C Na 7 N C O N O 0) C .A C 0 v0 (o Q L- _0 -a m Z .y C CL O C w W m L O U O -C "- >.-D C O L N N Clf r -O U w O (n U 0 a O + L C U O U '� 0 Ona) (D "= N a•L a)a00M > CU N L O N -2 3U) N (D-0 L N N M .... � O U O� U C O O _r_ U) U) N_ C (On O U) p N L 0 C E c`a "0 ca > cn U 7 U Oa) cQ a) C U 0 "a L •U - O C 0 d,- O C C `> O O O U L 0 'a U c+n L n N a.S "-E 0s-- ESQ Ocn :c'"a LP E 7 �0)) O cn W Q.Cn O O U w O (n N -C Ona) a a)a00M 3U) L N N M cn _aE U CU 0 C 0 0 m U N d N U (3LQ QU0❑❑oSEt=s"Ma 06 c O a) c C C La 2 c .� O ca T > m U) a ❑ (�0 C O L �+ O O N 0O U •N "- O +- C> L O U` O a) c 0 O C L Q�!E N c0 3 C O Cl) O ca •� T O O U O L C O U— "-' N N C U > �U) !� 0 OU)U3a) � � v Q- U U N .; � C C () m V -C'a N` Q N U O O y � 0 O O � j cQ cc U U N C m E A C C O a c0 E C 0 0 (n a L U (n .- 7 0 0 �. EL -C O LS (6�L� C N M O 0-0 i C N "L- O C L+�a E3An in0,a)U o U N p C Q N to 0 c O p U O C N N O U N O O N d N L > (0 O a 0 0 0 D E "J cO c E U ~�mcaO0300 ca N c 3 �� s 0 E U 0 cu "a 0U a) L >i (6 a C U ) CJ _ (U �. 0 q). O` C N Z _O Q O (0 O N O 7 (O NUS � a)0 0 U C -a 0 Q U (a C- 0 O _O U c O C L 0= O C a) (0 L N OUc.=cacn. a'mEU0)>m-a v 0 co O 0 �U-) (D Z N ca cu FL c) U p i.... NN C� U N 0— ❑a) c (n 3 0 c O id Oa E O d N V > C QY C .�. •C O E d a) C.u) Ou mU)ao a) (D a) a) a) " a) U O 0 fa O N �. V Q N O a) CO O N O 0 C a) O L U rn O>1 C O N N a)O- 0) c a) 0m0aa))Qa)` C O O p) f) c 0 N fn 2:Ll -0 m a)-0 4) C o f a� a� o E N V Q Q) (D fn 4) tv a) fn H IL ¢ 0 m Q.Cl) m Q.cn Oa E O d N V > C QY C .�. •C O E d a) C.u) Ou mU)ao a) (D a) a) a) " a) U O 0 fa O N �. V Q N O a) CO O N O 0 C a) O L U — O>1 C O N N a)O- U 5 C �c a) 0m0aa))Qa)` C O O f0A N '0 +, ¢�0��a.EEV) O 0 Q E C c�Q� N V Q V rn 0 �= ¢ 0 N p C �, o N =`_ C �- L f) ._O- .� 0 N fa -0 -C .C--. O O N U a) a 0 U N Q� fA 7 76 ¢ v °D�d.S N O N E fns m y Oa E O d N V > C QY C .�. •C O E d a) C.u) Ou mU)ao a) (D U a) fa O 0 L U) O a) v a a) a) ) V Q N O a) CO O N Q E C U) O L Q 7 O O>1 C O N U 5 C �c 70 cu O a) Z 0m0aa))Qa)` CL f0A N '0 +, ¢�0��a.EEV) O 0 O Q c�Q� 06 C O 0 C C C •C O N C .N ca U) IZ 0 C W Ca ca a) fn >, -0 N 0 Cts O O L U C _O . fa r O 0) AC 0 fa O �-,a) (� U t0 OD C CL > U) • aa)) m O cu_ to i- 0) L a) L O .. L N M O O L C 3 O a- v E> L) No>c'o�a>i 7 O U U C Ca > ` Qfn --a"0 fA —_ 2 0 0 0 —_ O —_ d fa N u) a) a) fa N fa a) U) I � aa)) f`a N Q u) c fn a) U >, U a) a) O wj v a a) a) ) a) U C U C fa O L L •N c N C O Q Q' "� +) 7 U C 70 cu O a) Z 0 O O N LTI) �3O'sL- (a CL v 0(nV)0r--o nZ Q c�Q� w W 0 ¢ 0 mom¢ Q�11)Z ¢ 0 C W Ca ca a) fn >, -0 N 0 Cts O O L U C _O . fa r O 0) AC 0 fa O �-,a) (� U t0 OD C CL > U) • aa)) m O cu_ to i- 0) L a) L O .. L N M O O L C 3 O a- v E> L) No>c'o�a>i 7 O U U C Ca > ` Qfn --a"0 fA —_ 2 0 0 0 —_ O —_ d fa N u) a) a) fa N fa a) U) I � aa)) f`a N Q u) c fn U >, U 0) a) fa a) a) O wj v a a) a) ) a) U C U C fa O L L N O Q Q' "� +) 7 U 0 C O 70 cu O a) Z 0 O O �' LTI) �3O'sL- (a CL v 0(nV)0r--o nZ Q c�Q� o 0 mom¢ Q�11)Z i0cc�EcQ u 0 as .E d L O~ O Y O 0 7 U fa p O C a) N fa -0 -C O O U) fA 7 76 N0 N O N M 7 _ 0 0 C N fa U J v. N fa �=t�. O.L. a) C L N C O ;= c) �c C 4-- a) Oma' N -C .66)EE Z N O C O fa I �+ fa 0 0 '~ C O .— C 0 7 C 0 fa 0 d ++ O O r_ U) a) N w U j 0 +) fa N O O fa C C C O C U L fa C U U d NCO tot Oji cQ C CO ;U 7 �' C Cl CO W fa C L U 0) a) E O> 0 a) 07 O ` d M O ,0) U> 0 U n U "- .N N .0 ¢ fa (a U) C W Ca ca a) fn >, -0 N 0 Cts O O L U C _O . fa r O 0) AC 0 fa O �-,a) (� U t0 OD C CL > U) • aa)) m O cu_ to i- 0) L a) L O .. L N M O O L C 3 O a- v E> L) No>c'o�a>i 7 O U U C Ca > ` Qfn --a"0 fA —_ 2 0 0 0 —_ O —_ d fa N u) a) a) fa N fa a) U) I � aa)) f`a N Q u) c c 0 La u m p= a0 cn O 3 CU rn a) O C 00 o �� J� �- c L=a c C o a) , d v N O � c N 0U a) a) a) H ti C >,+>' U) m a.U) p= a0 cn O 3 CU O O a) _U N cn ~ U a) co E c M a p >% O �� cc�CL 0 a0ooa.= O C 00 o �� J� �- c L=a -- C o a) , d N O a o U N 0U •QY C >,+>' a� O N C � O (q ` T N V V mcnU m 3 0 -CL w O c o •N c CCL w v o 0 U) �:• a a) W W Q o Q Nmrn°) °)��ccn ct c=="c=O.- (D" = a� a) N U U "N- O Z' O a) O O O" "O U) O O O p � C CO O +`• �, > U C p C O` U O O N :_ Q Q "O 3 C c 0 7 C 0 Q= a) L U N� 0 Q O` O O C C N O •- 'O c cn O C O m ca V Q O O p a) IL E c 2� �- E `� L Lo U 0) C ) — O O O cDc a)�o �cQ� o-cE °� )oma° v°)N`oE O' O ���-0 3 —L �F- a) cn C a ca O O U) a) c Ln N !� O U •N U) CL L O U O z v(a o�c� o� 0-0 ^o —oc�iaci oc�a) acro 7 CL U m c � «s -p O "� C O ( c O O �O N c6 N >, LC U (B O > (lS L a) .� C �. La V 3 a) Co C M Q > 6 a) O "_ 'C — p O E O a) -0 — c j t "O O U O` 3 .O C O N X C� Co N O L O� O> N X L L ❑ �o v)UC7.��m �a)ncnmu�asp.UM coaa)a)+.F- Lv c�-FU rno-0a) M + C L c L a +L. a) = _ U CO a)0 70 U) (B CL CL c `) 3 a) a) H C L U p` C: .0 -0 O O U C U O (i N N C c 7 L 6 U 0 O C_ C)cn O O co N N Q > :E F- LL A (a O N � � U CL o p � U V U r 7;� (DC U N V OO O O V CU Q2 E (Ong 0 V c CL Y E N vv d .N c Q N '++ m c oC w (A 'D C Q a) — C C >% C O^ >, 0 "- U a) a) O 0 0 "- rn CO V T "- C O 0" p m — "' O 'D C y C• L L Z, 0 0>" O C (a (a 0 _N O Fa ca U LLJ O N N U ,a) N O C�70 "D Y O 0-0 �... • p N N t Z CL M �_>. E 0U O 0 � UN NJ Na c: cu Z (� N CL` .� U N U •0 0 E Q N N "�-' +=3 -R C D) � C N C N Q'N c 0 c o E (ten ¢ o Cc v0i 0 0 " a 0 N 0 (6 (a > 3 0 O D) (a cl 0 a) o r 0 U) U-)- o� >,o=_"' c� 0 ca c �-0 c o °•� 0 E m o oUt �0 0� a)� 3 0'(a i a�CU 0 N� 0) (fl E a o �. E (n �c >; � 0 c, .. 0 NO N (aCU >^� r-� NZ O=O a)J Nom_ C O 0 0 0 DLA ` C D O 0 0 0 .r v t 'C U C (a C U L U U (a >i O +. (C6 O "'' p U CU o C:o (D-2co =x-00 300 0 (a(a (n>(aU -C �,— 3Nca0 Z c c vi �' " v z - n-0 c -0 EN 0 0 c D cc O c(a O N (n (n c .� ¢ O N ) co U .0 0 0 a) �. >, 0 vi N -D D N a) 0 c a c coi�'� E 0 �� �0 0 aci E >,� 315 co 0 c0i c �� Nrn aci E D7 U) 3: oo°(on a) o o�oc °� EaCo co cn -0 Ec)"(0`a o "o0 (Ya W -a 0�2 CL -DZ 02 (u U-) (a 30 L– Own._ 0)m O_Q— D (a=D 5-(n-0 .. O 00 O i C) �00 Zco J 0 d � (a C a (a � CL O U p U N a Lo c a N 0 -0 3 N 0 -CL 0 C (n 3 0 C: 3 0 0 C: 0 N E N O O c 0 C Z C (0 C i1 n j c � 0 c O m w m v d) U) U c 0) _ `o o E E pUi ILo) a-va �cuCU m�M Cl) `+ C- Ute) cu3°? c IL 0o c 0 c0 L- O 3 U N U `-� N = _ p N ._ U U _ - E O N Y U Q U) o Q IX N Q C a m (6 Q (� N 0-0-0 L m od C C O O T C (a >V - m 0)CL a C) (0 ca U V CL D U m lL d .c c C a C: a CL U U U) w7 Q> Q> w Q0 QD 7 U a) 7> t (6 W 0 U a) C N F 'O 0 O) O) (U p c U) O m (n c N (II c L (n — M "-' c fn N N N= c� o L L c .- c c � a5 viii- Q c_0 0) a3 CL -0 N (1)— c D rn N U) c O a 0 � C Vi O O U N O O U) c N "� U 0- Q C C C U = *' O a N CL o O— N U `� N vi c N N o.=rL `(a E c 3 (D m E�° �' "- N QQZ- N w E c� � m O 4) mIL E3(n°omo a) a) cn m -v—° is °°� Joao co L- O (0 > E U --c N 75 UL O c6 +_' C C -O E -0 fn O 'C (a r CL -L- L N 0-0 c N QCD c '� V) d` co "�-_ co u! Q 0) N Cl) O N- O d C O) (6 — -0 O a) O) O C C (a U) co U) O 'L E E L C U N N ) ;C "O O o Q — N 0-4) O = -_ N U) N U N— O) +' T L (`n C O C U) N U) d OQ E O -O (D O O E (U --S wo- N (a (a � c 0)4-- o N C d "O M O a) vi c C O a) '� .� -0 7 T C) - O a) U) N C CL C) p cLn a)O Q O E '5 O N 7 coi O U c 0) A E "= 0) L++ N 0 (NQ c O m 7 0 ti N O 0 j M 0 C (NC a 7 vOj +C- .O- O E _'rZ O (C d N m U U) 7" N L— N O a 0 U �C U O O N cu (B ig E 2 M5 4- 0-0 L 0 M Cr a,= LO -T>= r -O M 0 0 .. Q M O O) m 0 M M— O 2 C 2 U Q O U E O• N O 'O v ti 0 co O i O (O J O m m c Cl- a- 0 ao U C) i'= N a E 0o a) a in m C V% 3 0 c 3 0 0 c 0 'a ca w d OCNC- �O N OL O O C ' O c -a (0 U N a CCD � C w V N E C �_ ca CA C a a a) a (U a) ui O) c L a) a) 'p C F ami0a)E`cn a)—�0c� —� cu 0 C'm (�.co ._a s (a >> o O (n (n - NN'O 0.rL 0 p ` ON -0 N a(D N N � a) Q N .0 C a) rO) C Q 3 a) N N a Na) O C �_ CT �o•vcucu 0 �NO�-�a a) Q "'' C= N U c O O c d(D O a C 0-0 O U d p L. N +, U O C a) 7 U) j cn E> U 0 CL O 0 U) j p-0 V O 7 vEi (C 4) (p6 - •a) O C a) CO O C7 (NC a) a) 7 — cu O a) a) (a a) (9 OL Q E 0 7 d (0 U O N O w C L O a) O N c� a . 2 0 �° b ca ca cu a) (n c) ca d' 0 0 C) i 6 C:) CLz� a a CL CL(a ao U p N aLd -- U) �O 3 a0) 0 -CL a) c cn 3 0 C 0 0 c0) crn CY) rn E O L .. Q C L _ 4-. N O 7 O 0 v US 'Nc a (n Nc (n U)Cl) cn —0 d> >o co .N ..- .. C O •� O ` Oa E E L- O- E L O L O N p O L O O E. .70 •C a) a) a C N () � L a) HLQava O E ` Qa-oa G`a(n as 9s p(D ?: a) Y p C (n C mn O E >E> D 76CL a(n oa m` 0 O a) 0-0 a) V "p p O a) N a) a) V . ca Q 2 .� Z, cn N p c V m O c (n �m�pa C 0 Cls a)E) o=' (na _ Y �E�(°a�'ia +rc c� 0 a`C Co Q a) O U) O 0 CL aa)) O- a) (a L 00E�oE 0 0 L- 0 (n o C L Q� Q aacu as Q a° a� a�,� a0 w cu M oa ca Drs N vi a) C V N O vOi Q" O (n O O O T a) uc—io N 0 0 v > (A a) S m U) O C m2 •fl- in C E R' 0 be c: C•0 C d C pL E d ,� c .N Q O t (o T .> ca U 5 (a V V aoc)a0 mcn cnrmcn o m LL L L W �a �n �a =a �s ca U � ca U � (a U � U MD. a> a> a> > a1 C a a) a a) a (1) a a) �w <0 Q0 Q0 Q0 OCNC- �O N OL O O C ' O c -a (0 U N a CCD � C w V N E C �_ ca CA C a a a) a (U a) ui O) c L a) a) 'p C F ami0a)E`cn a)—�0c� —� cu 0 C'm (�.co ._a s (a >> o O (n (n - NN'O 0.rL 0 p ` ON -0 N a(D N N � a) Q N .0 C a) rO) C Q 3 a) N N a Na) O C �_ CT �o•vcucu 0 �NO�-�a a) Q "'' C= N U c O O c d(D O a C 0-0 O U d p L. N +, U O C a) 7 U) j cn E> U 0 CL O 0 U) j p-0 V O 7 vEi (C 4) (p6 - •a) O C a) CO O C7 (NC a) a) 7 — cu O a) a) (a a) (9 OL Q E 0 7 d (0 U O N O w C L O a) O N c� a . 2 0 �° b ca ca cu a) (n c) ca d' 0 0 C) i 6 C:) CLz� a a CL CL(a ao U p N aLd -- U) �O 3 a0) 0 -CL a) c cn 3 0 C 0 0 CO E O L .. O L - *, C L _ 4-. N O 7 O 0 �,n a �L L O N c E (D N p O L 0 MN Y L p O O bccumaam 3La)� O E ` N -p (n O c:, .- O E ,a N a) p m` 0 O a) N cc) N U) O O a) E a) — 0-0 c� �� V 00, =mN UN C 0 Cls Q O •-Cns c d O p E O•V-o O c Z C .,Q c 2 O O-0 C p C M Od 7 N N vi a) C V N O vOi Q" O (n O O O T Oa N O (A a) N N a) a) m U) O C m2 ac�-0 0 in C E R' 0 OCNC- �O N OL O O C ' O c -a (0 U N a CCD � C w V N E C �_ ca CA C a a a) a (U a) ui O) c L a) a) 'p C F ami0a)E`cn a)—�0c� —� cu 0 C'm (�.co ._a s (a >> o O (n (n - NN'O 0.rL 0 p ` ON -0 N a(D N N � a) Q N .0 C a) rO) C Q 3 a) N N a Na) O C �_ CT �o•vcucu 0 �NO�-�a a) Q "'' C= N U c O O c d(D O a C 0-0 O U d p L. N +, U O C a) 7 U) j cn E> U 0 CL O 0 U) j p-0 V O 7 vEi (C 4) (p6 - •a) O C a) CO O C7 (NC a) a) 7 — cu O a) a) (a a) (9 OL Q E 0 7 d (0 U O N O w C L O a) O N c� a . 2 0 �° b ca ca cu a) (n c) ca d' 0 0 C) i 6 C:) CLz� a a CL CL(a ao U p N aLd -- U) �O 3 a0) 0 -CL a) c cn 3 0 C 0 0 C O i.+ v 'C d a) `=' "O C� C T U) N '- O a) d 0 U) O a) (v C a .� O v p E 0` 7 O ` C a) O) O a) 0 a) 0 a) a) LL aR aA, Q UL�,0 L/L� < 2 cn CU ^L) O Ca f� a c' a) a) c (n 7 ca O L N (n a U o� - m c Q C C L O a) C p � 41 N p O cn C V Q U a) U o a.n c :3a UJm (n �.- 2 m O as c" a) ui (o cu -0 O a) UL�U T "O C O m a).c fn rn >, 06 aci Y �U c E o c o c c4 > m .Q a E c O) o U O C >, a) Ccr - > O 4) a) _ U V LL a0 UDmcq m Z =N Q. o U Z O O U N U) c- > Q > m c aa) am d'LU Q0 QD O C 7 > 0 C U 0 C6 O O M C O C O C> m m p L L N O � M fa a) O m L = 0 O ++ >+ O a) a) (a U co N CS a O C Ca N` 15- N p C C U 0 0 0 CU L cu (n � a c L- W= C L �� (DLL L) 0 c a3 0 U >,c 0 (n CU ° 0 0 c� o y L ai (Dc Q) Q os 0„_. � a a) N C (Q .O fa Q' O C` U U V c a) 0 O H C +-� U O p U O N (n Y p -�; U) ca _0 map ao o cn U 0)0)aca °) � a) > c� .. rn °_ U �� iJ o 0 N O U aCj M Q C C C C vi '� N L a) N 0 C_ _ 3 Cp l :� U U o >_ 4) N Q a L O U ) O •� L C'7 L o `) M p U (a (D� 0O m N a O = a) N p C= > p L RL •� N— o a) L o V U (o O o�vm T(DL c�L-0crn3�o m c 0ca p 7 a) O (n U "- O 7 N N N 7 (0 N N L O E 0 En O = a) Q N >, ` N o O" L` O L (n U co a) cn (n 7 N :_ a) _ a) U C a) IL a) O C O (v, O O' O U E ° F5 0 0 0 U U (a 7 0 0 CSU a) O L CO O C 0E--OQ c.- O "O = 016 m 3 o E a) -0-o2 (n (n ti O O O r - r J a) M C CL (o , FLo U p N CL a) 3 aE) 0 -CL a) c U) 3 0 c 0 0 C O �o N .0 U) c 'C ° c N C C CU� O p ,fA C L O 0-0-0 N L, 0 c0 rr +' -0 (o d t C E C a) �. �+ O Z > C o -vim°mE w- -0a)m — 0E'�'° oar E °'co °> N'� pit ° c o c E c ca`" v L.. o a) E �-0 cn LCO E -C �. �. L. L O c co o 0).. L 0 m N v ,a) a) (o co -0 C E ui �� m o U o o a�'i cis c c V D CL aEi c o 0� E �= m ca) 0 Q' a ° N U N a) N '> C� t U C fo L — M m O 0 1 C m >., N "� — 0 0 M O CD c, E o m coL c c� me ws o ac O �~ �;c�,F�L O O +, L Zc �0(D 3a)o-o°vco CL0 mE�"mrnm�' c O U c cVa �. c "�'' cn c° "- N cao U a'Oi N 0 E 3 E (n U a) �- N IL co ai _ c o cv ° �U aTQ0 E °� CO U)i c c c E" 0:Ll o L- (A N m E LQ.. ``—..o E c�� iN0 ��'E a�tc co (D iaci a�acinoaai� acai�ia o c a) L 4) a� v �. O L a� a O a� cu�'�� c� co o-0 c—i cow o °.E cow 3D 3� -0 _r � coU� ao m co Z m Z V Cl)c�� cc C O '- O U O '- C C L) U CU p) .0-. U CU a °(1)5°° d H IL c U)) rn o C 0 .� coy c uai rn O .S cn cNocuc E L 0O- ti ` 7 U C (n ++ O C O C O a) `�- a) O = cocu ++ C ° E� > t C O E O o O Q C a) v m W 0 o. W N a W 0- N ? a) 06 cn � � c 0 0 CL C:) _ 0 o co �p, C0) p E Wui x •C o c L V •- •- �+ — w (o fn L �, co > c�v Comm ao 3E CL c: CD as 3 C _ C CL _ C CL C O C. , Co c U N 0 I Q 0 Q N 0 C Wr W QD Q0 C O �o N .0 U) c 'C ° c N C C CU� O p ,fA C L O 0-0-0 N L, 0 c0 rr +' -0 (o d t C E C a) �. �+ O Z > C o -vim°mE w- -0a)m — 0E'�'° oar E °'co °> N'� pit ° c o c E c ca`" v L.. o a) E �-0 cn LCO E -C �. �. L. L O c co o 0).. L 0 m N v ,a) a) (o co -0 C E ui �� m o U o o a�'i cis c c V D CL aEi c o 0� E �= m ca) 0 Q' a ° N U N a) N '> C� t U C fo L — M m O 0 1 C m >., N "� — 0 0 M O CD c, E o m coL c c� me ws o ac O �~ �;c�,F�L O O +, L Zc �0(D 3a)o-o°vco CL0 mE�"mrnm�' c O U c cVa �. c "�'' cn c° "- N cao U a'Oi N 0 E 3 E (n U a) �- N IL co ai _ c o cv ° �U aTQ0 E °� CO U)i c c c E" 0:Ll o L- (A N m E LQ.. ``—..o E c�� iN0 ��'E a�tc co (D iaci a�acinoaai� acai�ia o c a) L 4) a� v �. O L a� a O a� cu�'�� c� co o-0 c—i cow o °.E cow 3D 3� -0 _r � coU� ao c O I) E NO U O p C Z c (U ra 7 a) c w 0 C 0 R L 0 cu cu0 2 Z C +. fA C W U 0 O .— c C 0 .— 0 C C ;, C O U % O U O— O U 7 U (� U N 0) O U a) 7 O co N (D7 7 U H LL O` C U C fn a) O` Cr 0 U C N O) C U rL+ .0 .0 F '--E U t 7 U U Q� co` M 0�°y-3 0�0 0 C 'N a 0' 'N w, N E j L C N O E 40 U Q m W co) a m a W co) -0 m 06 U Y � O j C > 0 C O)o E V C •� '— (a Q N > c0y aomcn ao d � L CL U U N Q > a > W Q 0 Q a) C O a) C O U C) C O M U _C C Q a) -0 U 4)-D 0 -0 n 0 L C a) c �� � _� � �. c >~ E 0 E Mt 0 N�.c>N:cc O 3M�[LN��a°c aa)i0ai3 c- N N ClS C C- N a) ic`O0) t O C w 0 to 0 0 C -C U O U .O N (A O 0 j L a) CL " U 0 -0 0 C C -0 Q O— 'O 0 CL H���O Uin (D tMm�c cu mmcca0m��00= L (iDn�. U a-� 0 0j- N E Ute~ 0 t O� 0ca� oU (� >, ca 0'..'"0 -0 -0 va ►-(n (n O'C 0�,0UU0 0E 0 ��cc�(a0c C v0 rn0 c00L-00•0 co(va�,a) m o 0 3 oF- �� �� c ON ccn rn0 3m a) UU) 0 �,� o a) 0(a 00'0 c— ) �Y"� 0 E o�c0av�NN0 N" =� �� 0��c o� 0 ui ° 0 �'c� 0 0 0 (u �H ca (cam. a�0i -04-a) Q v��..- c0a rn0 cca � CO �. 0 3��� 0 Fn �.. u aa)) a) �U� a� ti 0 co O i O M J a) d � c a N � FL O _U p U N aLd a 0 0.0 0— C: C (n O C 3 O 0 C O N (D E N O O p) C: p C Z c R c a O 7 N c N O w 0 C C � d H LL cc cu U) °) o c O ' O j 0 N U ` L � Q O N c (n CD 0 C 0 U If C O R (0 C Qa R ca ° =3 0 +-' U () a) C ,� a) U N ui O a R Q. m cu Z ° c �--•- O cc O - O U a) 7 O U C (nom 0 O.S U � a) C � � R a) c � R NCL LE 40- L-- O LU 0 L a.N rn w C-6 m>% .06 C Y C'- C c' -O m cU o cU ° °�, c R > R > ac) R_ QY a O� A O c >, U V E in vv U0mv) Uomcnao Gi t2 cn a) U (a tm C cu cm cm C O O a) O C O LC Q)>N 0Ocm-Cw°a>OO C m N O O a rn� ° ° �,° R�c:c >� CUCL ° aa)) o 0 co a)m C O a) ` Q- 0 R 0 0 O L ` Q Q O- Q m c "O - a) c Z C O R (D t (a to dL C 00'O RCiC-CL N v- O N Cc NO OOmCN > CO 3 0 O O • OO ww- >,vc O m0 O co N C 4 O U) L LO a) O -0 Co MC R C O R a) C O C .-. to .. O L- O N L a) ca E V C ur d a) N a) a) O O a) O` R a) w O L " E U ° � U) �`. (`a U L N U LL CL 0 D v U (U Z. O .0 (n Q. 0 co O O r � J a) a � co C: a (0 CL 00 N CLCD U � a) CD c 00 n 0 CD c 0 c O O c O cn N co O ,U C) C p C z= 0 iN C �O � D a� a) E m HLL 2 vi a) C O N v ti 0 0 0 , 0 �U-) z� J a) a rn cu �a cu ao U p U N Q U T a) C O � O Q" CD C U) 0 C 3 0 0 C> a) C c C a) N U O a) cu Q 3 Q Co N U C O O a) O -Op .E a) a) t i U p p L N C fU C N in c 0) L 3 W p O p tfC .. C N O a) 0. a) �•— t aa)) > : U N O �s a) U -0 p C O p C cu E vi a) C O N v ti 0 0 0 , 0 �U-) z� J a) a rn cu �a cu ao U p U N Q U T a) C O � O Q" CD C U) 0 C 3 0 0