HomeMy WebLinkAbout08. CIP 19-14 Approve Agrmt w-KOA Corp for Eng Design Srvcs-Bike Master Plan PH 1Item No.
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED BY
CIT
FROM: OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
BY: DELFINO R. CONSUNJI, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKSICITY ENGINEE
DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 2020
S11BJECT: APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERTICES AGREEMENT WITH KOA CORPORATION FOR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF DOWNEY BIKE
MASTER PLAN PHASE I-DOWNTOWN/TRANSIT IMPLEMENTATION, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT (CIP) NO. 19-14
I N *4101 J, I J, 14 0 1 by -A 0 Eel k,
That the City Council:
1. Approve professional services agreement with KOA Corporation in the amount of
$439, 915 for professional engineering design services related to the implementation of
Downey Bike Master Plan Phase 1 - Downtown/Transit Project, CIP No. 19-14;
Emm=-1111! 11!1111111!!11�1 11;11111�!111 !III 1111111!1pyy!111 . 0 - 0 za��
3. Authorize City Manager to execute any and all amendments to the agreement as deemed
necessary for this project.
*T4]XC];i917]
In 2014, the City initiated a Bike Master Plan (BMP) to serve as a blueprint for the development
and gradual implementation of the City's bicycle circulation system, establish a policy framework
that will enhance bicyclist mobility and safety and identify active transportation as a travel
alternative and strategy for meeting the mobility needs of the public. The City Council adopted
the BMP in July 2015. Following the adoption of the BMP, the City applied for and received
$2,277,933 in Proposition C 25% grant funding for the implementation of the initial phase of the
BMP through the 2015 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Call
for Projects.
wit= a 0 11 TO
0 0 0 0 0 -11-1 00 10 911 A 1 11 -2 0 0
17111-2 g, I - . .1 Ipoomm" [:All] piwel 14 mill all - IVAIIZ M111411190121VI
Professional Services Agreement with KOA Corporation for the implementation of Downey Bike
Master Plan Phase 1 - Downtown/Transit Project, CIP No. 19-14
February 25, 2020
decrease in vehicle trips and greenhouse gas emissions, as well as enhancing the existing
pedestrian and bicycle network by creating interconnected bicycle facilities with neighboring
jurisdictions, key origins and destinations external to the City and nearby regional bike facilities
(i.e., Los Angeles and San Gabriel River bike trails). Said bike -related improvements will better
serve the cycling needs of the citizens of Downey and the region as there are currently no
existing bicycle facilities in the City with the exception of Gardendale Street between Lakewood
Boulevard and Garfield Avenue and Brookshire Avenue between Gardendale Street and
Florence Avenue.
The locations of the eight roadway segments on which the Class II bike routes are proposed to
be installed are as follows:
1
1. Downey Avenue
2. Downey Avenue
3.
Brookshire Avenue
4.
Columbia Way
5.
Woodruff Avenue
6.
Gallatin Road
7.
Stewart & Gray Road
8.
Foster Road
I Total Distance I
Limits
Distance
(miles)
Gallatin Road to 5tn Street
1.2
Firestone Boulevard to Gardendale
2.0
Street
Imperial Highway to Cherokee Drive
2.1
Lakewood Boulevard to Foster Road
0.8
Firestone Boulevard to Foster Road
1.5
Tweedy Lane to Lakewood Boulevard
0.9
Firestone Boulevard to west city limit
3.2
Lakewood Boulevard to east city limit
1.9
13.7
The locations of the various bike routes and other related amenities to be
constructed/implemented through this project are shown on the attached Project Location Map
(Attachment A).
A Request for Proposals (RFP) for this project was solicited two times through Planet Bids. The
first RFP solicitation was issued on August 22, 2019 and proposals were received from KOA
Corporation and W.G. Zimmerman Engineering, Inc. on September 18, 2019. Since a response
was received from only two firms, the RFP was recirculated on October 4th, 2019 in the interest
of achieving a higher response rate. On October 29, 2019, proposals were again received from
KOA Corporation and W.G. Zimmerman Engineering, Inc.
In the interest of moving this project forward, a consultant review panel consisting of three
Public Works representatives evaluated the proposals based on the responses to specific RFP
criteria, as well as a consultant interview conducted on December 19, 2019 that included:
understanding of the work, experience with similar projects, qualifications of project team
members, capability of developing innovative and/or advanced techniques, technical ability and
approach in providing scope of services, quality of proposal and cost-effectiveness. Based on
the review of proposals submitted and interviews conducted with the two consultants, KOA
Corporation received the highest ranking. The firm has demonstrated extensive relevant
experience with similar BMP projects, knowledge of pedestrian and multi -modal planning and
Metro Sustainable Design Elements, and the preparation of planning and safety documents, all
K
Professional Services Agreement with KOA Corporation for the implementation of Downey Bike
Master Plan Phase 1 - Downtown/Transit Project, CIP No. 19-14
February 25, 2020
of which are critical elements of this project. Staff has confirmed that KOA Corporation
possesses the necessary licenses and has met all requirements for this project.
The scope of this project include the following:
0 Class 11 bike lanes on eight arterial segments for a total distance of 13.7 miles
0 Class III (signed only) bike routes on 24 roadway segments
0 100 bicycle parking facilities
0 50 wayfinding signs
* Signalization modifications to enhance the detection of bicycles at 30 intersections
Construction of these facilities will include eight road diets (a traffic calming measure that
involves converting a travel lane into a dedicated bike lane) in order to provide the necessary
street width for the installation of Class 11 bike lanes as well as continuous two-way left -turn
lanes.
The approval and execution of the attached professional services agreement (Attachment B) will
allow KOA Corporation to proceed with the aforementioned professional engineering design
services. Staff recommends approval of the attached agreement.
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Quality of Life, Infrastructure & Parks
FI&TKY11111 it X, W1
Based on the proposal received from KOA, the total estimated cost of this project, including
�5ngineering design and project administration is $460,000 broken down as follows:
F _Descro.tion Amount
Professional consulting services $439,915
Contract administration and proj "n gpment $20,085
Total Estimated Project Co$460,000
A total of $460,000 is currently programmed in the FY 2019-2020 CIP to support this activity
with funding provided by the Metro Proposition C 25% grant and Measure M Local Return
funds.
The total project funding is broken down as follows:
Account No, Fundinq Source
26-16765 Metro Proposition C 25% grant funds
57-16765 Measure M Local Return funds
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Project Location Map
Attachment B - Professional Services Agreement
AmounL�
$368,000
$9,21000
Total Project Funding: $460,000-]
K
a
• t tea..
fi
d civic Cna�
I,Alarren i s scjioblf,-'
�• Existing Bicycle Facilities
sf, Bike Path (Class I)
P'-Ap stias Eco-Rapid tine St n ^ - t Under/Overpass NORTH
Car'enda e sti-eew a- 'j r` Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Planned Bicycle Facilities
Bike Lane (Class II)
,� ----• Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
--- Bike Route (Class III)
e`ro Green Line La ewd BlvdBuffered Bike Lane (Class II)
m
Gateway Cities Bike Project Idea Corridor
�F t School
o _ Park
Pr Gateway Cities Bike Project Idea Location
Existing Bicycle Path Access Points
Note: This graphic is eonceptual in nature, and is dependent on Avail,ability,& fundindand further study of alignments.
. w Phase II Bicycle Improvements
y
y
n
A
1. PARTIES AND DATE.
This Agreement is made and entered into this 25th day of February, 2020 by and
between the City of Downey, a California municipal corporation and charter city with its
principal place of business at 11111 Brookshire Avenue, Downey California 90241 ("City")
and KOA Corporation, a California Corporation, with its principal place of business at 1100
Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201, Monterey Park, California 91754 ("Consultant"). City and
Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."
Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain
professional engineering design services required by City on the terms and conditions set
forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it has demonstrated competence and
experience in providing engineering design services to public clients, is licensed in the Sta
of California, and is familiar with the plans of City. I
Mnnu=
City desires to engage Consultant to render such services for the City of Downey Bike
Master Plan Phase 1 Downtown/Transit Class 11 Implementation Project ("Project") as set
forth in this Agreement.
3.1.1 General Scooe of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish
to City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work
necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional engineering design services
necessary for the Project ("Services"). The Services are more particularly described in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be
subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules
and regulations.
REMEM111111111111 1 1111 1 111 1111 1 � :
-11al 14
Control and Pavrnent Of SUbordinae ei1dp9t._gPntractor. The
Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will
#etermine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the
requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis
and not as an employee. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services
"or others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the
Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City
and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall
pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their
performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be
responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but
not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance,
disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance.
In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant
providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent
for enrollment in CalPERS as an employee • City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, ani
hold harmless CITY for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for
CalPERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as
well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would
otherwise be the responsibility of City.
Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services
z�xpeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of
Services set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform
the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's
conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely
manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of
anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services. The parties acknowledge that the
Schedule of Services may be amended by mutual agreement due to changes in
circumstances, including changes in the performance schedules of other third parties
performing work for the City on the Project, which affect the timing of Consultant's
performance of the Services.
3.2.3 Conformance to ApOicable ReQUirements. All work prepared by
Consultant shall be subject to Che approval of City.
Substitution of Kev Personnel. • has represented to City that
certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should
one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other
personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City
and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to
terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to
perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to
be uncoo * %erative. incom.p.,etent a threat to the adexuate or timelo com]cletion of the Pro ect or
a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by
the • at the `• of the City.
3.2.5 Citv's Representative. The City hereby designates Delfino R. Consunji,
P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer, or his designee, to act as its representative for
the performance of this Agreement ("City's Representative"). City's Representative shall
have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Contract. Consultant
shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City's Representative or
his designee.
3.2.6 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates Min Zhou,
P.E., Principal -in -Charge, or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of
this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full
authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this
Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using
her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques,
sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services
under this Agreement.
3.2.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City
staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants and
ofter st7.-Y at all reasonable times.
3.2.8 Standard of Care� Performance of Emplovees. Consultant shall perform
all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the
standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in
the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the
professional calling necessary to perform the Services. •i warrants that all
employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the
Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and
subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature
that are legally required to perform the Services, including a City Business License, and that
such licenses • approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As
provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at
its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary
to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with tht
standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its sub -consultants
who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or
timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any
employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner consistent with the
standard of care set forth herein, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the
Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the
Project.
3.2.9 Laws and RequIations. Consultant shall keep itself fully inform d of an
in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulationsIn force
the time the Services are performed by Consultant and in any manner affecting the
performance of the Project or the Services, including all applicable Cal/OSHA requirements,
and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such
laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work
knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notic
to the City, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant
shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents
free and harmless, pursuant to the applicable indemnification provisions of this Agreement,
from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such law
rules or regulations. Consultant's violation of such laws, rules and regulations shall also
constitute a material breach of this Agreement. I
3.2.10.1 Time for Co(npliance. Consultant shall not commence the
Services or the Project under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the
City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall
not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided
�nvidence satisfactory to the City that the subcontractor has secured all insurance required
under this section. The City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits,
based on the nature of the risk, prior experience with insurer, coverage or other special
circumstances.
3.2.10.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense,
procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries
to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the
performance of the Agreement, the Services or the Project by the Consultant, its agents,
representatives, employees or subcontractors. Consultant shall also require all of its
subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the
Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage:
(A) )Minimurn Scope of Insurance.. (1) Commercial General
Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence"
basis including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and
personal and advertising injury; (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form
Number CA 0001 covering Code 1 (any auto) or if Consultant owns no autos, Code 8 (hired)
and 9 (non -owned); and (3) Workers' Compensation : Workers' Compensation insurance as
required by the State of California with Statutory Limits; and (4) Employer's Liability
Insurance.
(B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain
limits no less than: (1) Commercial General Liability (CGL): No less than $2,000,000 per
occurrence for products and completed operations, bodily injury, property damage and
personal and advertising injury. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with
general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to
this Agreement/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be
twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability.' No less than $2,000,000 per
accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) Workers' Compensation: Workers'
Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California with Statutory
Limits; (4) Employer's Liability: Employer's Liability limits of no less than $2,000,000 per
accident for bodily injury or disease. Employer's Liability coverage may be waived by the City
if City receives written verification that Consultant has no employees.
If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimum shown in
this subdivision 3.2.10.2, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage
and/or the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in
excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the
City.
3.2.10.3 Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions). Consultant
shall procure and maintain, and require its sub -consultants to procure and maintain, for a
period of five (5) years following completion of the Services or the Project, errors and
omissions liability insurance appropriate to its profession. Such insurance shall be in an
amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim and $2,000,000 in the aggregate,
and shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. If the Consultant maintains broader
coverage and/or higher limits than the minimum shown in this subdivision 3.2.10.3, the City
requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the
Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of
insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
3.2.10.4 Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall
contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms
approved by the City to add the following provisions to the insurance policies:
(A) Additional Insured Status. The Commercial General
Liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the City, its directors, officials, officers,
employees, agents and volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to
liability arising from the work, Services, Project or operations performed by or on behalf of the
Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work,
Services, Project or operations; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as
respects the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, or if
excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled
underlying coverage. Commercial General Liability insurance coverage may be provided in
the form of an endorsement to the Consultant's insurance (at lease as broad as ISO Form
CG 20 10 11 85 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33 or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if
later revisions are used).
(B) YVaiver of Subrogation. Consultant hereby grants to City a
waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against
the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under said insurance policies set forth herein.
Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of
subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a
waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
(C) !�P Coverac es. Each insurance policy required by this
Agreement shall be endorsed to state that: (A) coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
reduced or canceled except with written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested to
the City; and (B) any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies,
including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its directors,
officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.
3.2.10.5 PrimaiyCoverage. For any claims related to this
Agreement, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance and primary
coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 with respect to the City, its directors,
officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance
maintained by the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers sh
be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in I
UWAM
S Daration of Insured% No S g
3.2.10.6 _s. All
insurance required by this Section shall contain standard separation of insureds provisions.
In addition, such insurance shall not contain any special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its directors officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.
3.2.10.7 Deductibles and Self -Insurance Retentions. Any
deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. City may
require Consultant to provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim
administration and defense expenses and costs within the retention. The policy language
shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by
either the named insured or City.
3.2.10.8 Acceptabilitv of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with
insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VII, authorized to do business in
California, and satisfactory to the City.
3.2.10.9 Verification of Covera_qe. Consultant shall furnish City with
original certificates of insurance, including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies
of the applicable policy language effective coverage required by this provision) and a copy of
the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the Commercial General Liability policy listing all
policy endorsements to the City before the commencement of work under this Agreement.
However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the commencement of work under
this Agreement shall not waive the Consultant's obligation to provide them to the City. The
City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies,
including endorsements, at any time.
3.2.10.10 Claims -Made Policies. If any of the policies provide
coverage on a claims -made basis:
(A) The retroactive date must be shown and must be before the date of this
Agreement or the date work commences under this Agreement, whichever is earliest;
(B) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be
provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the Services provided under this
Agreement;
(C) If coverage is canceled, non -renewed, and not replaced with another
claims -made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the effective date of this Agreement
or the date work commences under this Agreement, whichever is earliest, the Consultant
must purchase extended reporting coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion
of the Services under this Agreement.
3.2.11 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid
injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall
at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and
regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees
appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be
performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A)
adequate life protection and life-saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in
fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and
shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are
necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for
the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.
3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including
authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set
forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total
compensation shall not exceed FOUR HUNDRED THIRTY NINE THOUSAND NINE
HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($439,916.00) without written approval
the City. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, said Extra
Work will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. I
3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Consultant shall maintain complete and
accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All
such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City
during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such
records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow
inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement
for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.
3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to
Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time either for cause or
for the City's convenience and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such
termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the
effective date of such termination. Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause
upon giving the City not less than seven (7) calendar days' written notice.
Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which
have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further
compensation. The City shall within fifteen (15) calendar days following termination pay the
Consultant for all services adequately rendered and all reimbursable costs incurred by
Consultant up to the date of termination, in accordance with the payment provisions of this
Agreement.
The following reasons shall constitute "cause" for which either party may terminate this
Agreement as provided herein:
• Substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms of
this Agreement and through no fault of the terminating party;
• Assignment of this Agreement or transfer of the Project by either party to any
other entity without the prior written consent of the other party;
• Suspension of the Project or the Consultant's Services by the City for more than
ninety (90) calendar days, consecutive or in the aggregate, without good cause;
• Material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered
into, the Scope of Services or the nature of the Project, and the failure of the
parties to reach agreement on the compensation and schedule adjustments
necessitated by such changes.
3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as
provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents
and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the
performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such
Documents and Data and other information within fifteen (15) days of the City's request.
3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is
terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in
such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.
3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this
Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other
address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:
ME
KOA Corporation
Monterey Park, California 91754
Phone: (323) 260-4703
Fax: (323) 260-4705
Attn: Min Zhou, P.E., President/CEO
City of Downey
11111 Brookshire Avenue
Downey, California 90241
Phone: (562) 904-7102
Fax: (562) 904-7296
Aftn: Delfino R. Consunji, P.E., Director of Public Works/City
City of Downey
City Attorney's Office
191*11,73 mOTAME I I 101 is I RVIRM, I I
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-
;tJght (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to
ihe party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the —
date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.
3.5.3 OwnershiD of Materials and ConfidentialitV.
3.5.3.1 Documents& Data� Licensiqq of IntelleCtUal Propgily. This
Aqreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify,
reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied
in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of
authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical
drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are
prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents &
Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a
non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares
under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal
10
3.5.6 Indemnification.
3.5.6.1 General • Except as provided in subdivision
• which is applicable to "design professionals" • • shall defend (with
counsel acceptable to City), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees,
volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action,
costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage • injury, in law or equity, to property or persons,
including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged negligent
acts, errors, omissions or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees,
agents, consultants and contractors arising • • •. in connection with the performance •
'the Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all
consequential damages and attorneys'fees and other related costs and expenses.
Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such
aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or
instituted against City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers.
Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered
against City or its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers, in any such
suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse City and its directors,
officials, officers, employees, agents and/or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and
costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein
provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if
any, received by the City, its directors, officials officers, employees, and agents or volunteers.
Consultant shall not be obligated to defend, indemnify or hold the City harmless in any
manner whatsoever for any claims or liability arising solely out of the City's own negligent
acts, errors or omissions or willful misconduct.
me] a; I IVA gt6imol &;rg IVA Lor-al
w w
Mal
------- 61611
off - 0
3.5.7 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the
parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations,
understandings or agreements.
Governing_Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the
State of California. Venue shall be the courts in Los Angeles County.
3.5.9 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of
this Agreement.
a
3.5.10 9±tVCi 's Riqht to Emr)lov Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ
other consultants in connection with this Project.
3.5.1 1I.Successors and. Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the
successors and assigns of the parties.
3.5.12 Assignment or Transfer. Neither party shall assign, hypothecate, or
transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without
the prior written consent of the other party. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and
any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of
such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.
3.5.13 Construction; References; CaQ1!g9s. Since the Parties or their agents
have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement
shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any
Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar
days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees,
agents, and subcontractors of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement.
All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers
except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and
paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit,
augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.
3.5.14 Amendment: Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment
of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.
3.5.15 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other
default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit,
privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any
contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.
3.5.16 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party
beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.
3.5.17 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared
invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining
provisions shall continue in full force and effect.
3.5.18 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not
employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working
solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it
has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift
13
In the event of any conflict, inconsistency, or incongruity between any provision of this
Agreement, any of its exhibits, attachments, purchase order, or notice to proceed, the
provisions of this Agreement will govern and control.
♦ i'
3.6.1 Prior Awroval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract an� lorli n )n
the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without 1 lor wri?tten
approval of City. Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain
insurance meeting all of the requirements set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall ensu
that City is an additional insured as required in Section 3.2.10.4. Subcontracts, if any, shall
contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.
CITY OF DOWNEY,
a California municipal corporation
?nd charter city
M
Maria Alicia Duarte, CM
City Clerk I
07010���
M
KOA Corporation,
15
EXHIBIT
SECTION 2: UNDERSIANDING OF PROJECT
Methodology
SECTION 5: KEY PERSONNEL
KOA Firm Profile
Subconsull Firms
Organizotional Chart
Availability Table
Resumes of Key Personnel
1101i I ii I'll 11 RIVERS 11110113121 1 IF I
2
4
6
27
28
9
M
M
TO
Mr. De|fino[onou ji PE
Director ofPublic Works
City ofDowney
lllllBrookshire Avenue
Downey, CA 90241
FROM
Mr. GiuseMe Canzonieri _PE
Project Manager
RFP
Professional Engineering Design
Services for
Downtown/Transit Class 11
Implementation
Capital Improvement Project
No. 19-14
RECEIVED
CITY OF DOWNEY
07?q ?Q19
Dear Mr. Consunji:
KOACorporation (KOAisplease to submit this proposal describing our
experience and capabilities toprovide the City ofDowney with the Bike Master
Plan Phase lDowntown/Transit Class OImplementation Project.
KDAisone ofthe leading civil engineering, traffic engineering, and
transportation planning firms in Southern California. Our firm has six offices in
Southern California and over 110 staff members, including California registered
Civil and Traffic Engineemand[er1ifiedP|annem.
\Nehave over ]Uyears ofexperience inprovidingengineerngservicesto|oca|
governments throughout California. Throughout that time, wehave provided
engineering services for planning, design, and implementation ofseveral
multimoda| and complete streets projects, including the first two Class IV
bikeways inSouthern California (Broadway, Long Beach and Rosemead Blvd,
Temple City). We recently collaborated with the City ofClaremont to design
and implement the Foothill Boulevard Master Plan, which includes wider
sidewalks, Class 11 & IV bikeways, bio-retention planters (LID's), street furniture,
500 new street trees, landscape, irrigation, traffic signal modificadons'stveet/
pedestrian lighting, and many other features tocomplement the corridor.
KOAhas a positive working rapport with the City ofDowney. We fully
understand the [hw'sexpectations and products. This proposal will clearly
outline our understanding and approach tothis project endhowthe[ity
can benefit from our local knowledge and experience. KOAhas many years
of experience in utilizing industry standards and methods such as those
adopted bvthe City ofDowney. This includes mworking knowledge of, and
experience with, federal, state, and local design standards, including design
standards established bvthe American Public Works Association (\PWA),
Federal Highway Administration (FHVVA) as well as the California Department
ofTransportation ([o|traos).VVe|ookforvvardtohavinganopportunityto
meet with you to discuss how KOA can serve the City onfuture improvement
In addition to our capable staff, we have added Terry A. Hayes Associates,
Inc. (Environmental) to our team. They are an expert in their field and provide
the supplemental support and services to complete the project goals and
objectives. We have worked with them for years and have found them to be
highly experienced, reliable, and professional. Our team will be a valuable asset
to the success of this project.
Min Zho4PE, will serve asPrincipal- in -Charge and will ensure KOAmeets the
City's expectations on every part of this important assignment. Ms. Zhou can
bereachedat(323)26O-47O3.endviaemai|atmzhuu@koacorp.com.
KIM
AN-11d ell ---- ---- yr q ns concernin
proposal.
lil'ililililill iiii I i Will ill III lli�
Sincerely,
KO A Corporation
Giuseppe Canzorl PE
Vice President, Senior Engineer
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Woodruff Avenue Firestone Boulevard to Foster Road
Downey Avenue Gallatin Road to 51h Street
Downey Avenue Firestone Boulevard to Gardendale
Street
Brookshire
Brookshire Avenue Cherokee Drive to 3d Street
Columbia Way Imperial Highway to Foster Road
Class II Bike Lane : 1.5 miles
Class 1I Bike Lane /
2.2 miles
Road Diet
Class II Bike Lane /
2.0 miles
Road Diet
Class 11 Bike Lane /
0.4 miles
Road Diet
Class 11 Bike Lane /
1.3 miles M
Road Diet
Class II Bike Lane /
0.5 miles
Road Diet
{
Gallatin Road Tweedy Lane to Lakewood Boulevard Class 11 Bike Lane / 0.9 miles
Road Diet
Foster Road Lakewood Boulevard to East City Limit Class II Bike Lane / 1.8 miles
Road Diet
Brookshire Avenue 3'd Street to Iowa Street Class In Bike Route 0.3 miles
Stewart & Gray Road Firestone Boulevard to West City Limit Class In Bike Route 3.1 miles
Lakewood Boulevard to Imperial
Columbia ay Class III Bike Route 0.3 miles
Highway
E
Proposed EKiSting
Class 11 -Bike Lane —Classill- City Hall Metro - Bike B;ke
Bike Green Line Path Rz."'10 Miles
..... Class h - Bike Lane Route 'in';piuo a9k School
with Road Diet Mojor 'fl Center Park
Phase 1 Downtown/Transit Class II Implementation Map
.1 ..........
-ach task.
CITY OF DOWNEY I BIKE MASTER PLAN PHASE I DOWNTOWN/TRANSIT CLASS II iMPLEMENTATJON 5
PROJECT APPROACH
KOA recognizes that the success ofany relatedproject relies on the skills and experience of the team members
involved inmanaging the project, asweUasunderstandingkevp jectchaUengesandprovdingvalue quality work, and
responsive service tothe City. lngeneral, the scope ateach ofthe project |ocationsw/i||betodesigneitherOasaDor
Class III bicycle facilities.
Determining the feasibility of the planned bike lanes/route will be a crucial step in implementing the City's Bike
Master Plan. There are often times that a City moves forward with implementing a Bike Master Plan with no regards to
operational or physical feasibility. We have developed the following approach to summarize our process to determine the
feasibility ofthe Bike Master Plan implementation.
TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL EVALUATION
KOA`s approach will beone that holistically assesses the proposed p ject'sphvyicalconstraintswithpotenda|operabona|
impacts that will provide the City with enough data and analysis that will ultimately breed consensus and project
acceptance.
As part of our constructability assessment, KOA will also analyze the operational characteristics of each corridor with
proposed bikeway installation and its effects onparallel streets. KOAwill collect traffic, bicycle, and pedestrian counts,
aswell esscreen line ADTcounts in order to determine how the proposed project will affect vehicle operations and
improve the bicycling environment. KOA will do this by developing a citywide Synchro network to map out all affected
intersections and roadways.
Ashas been the experience with similar road -diet / lane -reduction projects, increased vehicle delay due toreduced
vehicle roadway capacity can lead tomore traffic onparallel streets. The problem isthat sometimes these streets happen
to be mostly residential. In order to assess the holistic effects that the road -diet implementation might have on certain
corridors, the KOA team will also collect counts on select streets that are parallel to road -diet locations in order to better
asses overall project impactsonneighborhoodnnobi|ity.
KOAalso understands that the story cannot be'ustabout how the project will negativelyimpact the [itv'sstreets —in
order toprovide the City with quantitative data and results ofhow the project vvi||improvethebicvdingemvinmnment,
KOA will conduct a Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) analysis. ITS will be used to evaluate if a Class U or a buffered bike lane is
adequate for bicycle riders, especially unexperienced riders. These results will bepresented etcommunity workshops
and atcity council meetings.
GEOMETRIC FEASIBILITY
166.1 6a Firit, we will send our engineers to the fie1W
inconsistent roadway width so we will be sure to measure all roadway width changes. We will then develop typical cross
sections for each corridor.
with planned Class II bike lanes. The cross sections represent an area along the project corridor with the most constrained
rodwav wid1h. Please note that these cross sections only represent one of possibly several alternatives that may be
In areas along the corridors that have additional roadway width than what is shown in the constrained conditions below,
we will work with the City in providing alternatives to include:
® Additional bike lane width
® Buffered bike lanes
-Depending on the roadway classification, speed limit and parking turnover, bike lane buffers can be included
between the bike lane and vehicle travel lane, bike lane and parking lane, or both,
® Additional vehicle lane width
Intersection treatments will also be addressed as part of our geometric feasibility analysis, KCIA engineering staff
will review existing intersection configuration and ensure that bicycle lanes can transition effectively and safely to the
intersection. Emphasis will be placed on reducing conflicts with right -turning vehicles and pedestrians. Treatment such
as bicycle boxes, conflict zone striping (green cat track), protected intersection treatments (as space allows), will all be
explored.
WOODRUFF AVENUE — FIRESTONE BOULEVARID TO FOSTER ROAD
Planned Bicycle Facility: Class 11 Bike Lane
Most Constrained Roadway Curb -to -Curb Width: Approx. 75'— 78'
78'
6' 10' I 10, W _ 10, 61 81
PARKING SS SB TRAVEL 85 TRAVEL TWLT / LT M NB TRAVEL NB TRAVEL NB PARKINC
BIKE BIKE
LANE LANE
WOODRUFF AVE
FIRESTONE BLVD TO ANGELL ST
79�
7 r1 51
-PARMU'A' - SB -._SST
10, 10,
VEL BE TRAVEL
10' 10, 10,
TWLT / LT N15TRAVEL NRTRAVELA
51 151
NB_ _'PAtWINO
BIKE
LANE
BIKE
LAN
WOODRUFF AVE
ANGELL ST TO BELCHER ST
1LTjr*TM5mmCF=- al
6a -4
8. 1C 81
PARKING SB SB TRAVEL TwLT / LT NB TRAVEL NB1-1�� A H KING
LANE BIKE BIKE LANE
LANE LANE
JA
m*1
DOWNEY AVE
GALLATIN RD TO 5TH ST
DOWNEY AVENUE — FIRESTONE BOULEVARD TO GARDENDALE STREET
Planned Bicycle Facility: Class 11 Bike Lane with Road Diet
Most Constrained Roadway Curb -to -Curb Width: Approx. SU
5. 10, 10, 10,
PARKING SB -SBTRAVEL TWLT I LT NB TRAVEL 13A
LANE BIKE BIKE LANE
LANE LANE
DOWNEY AVE
FIRESTONE BLVD TO GARDENDALE ST
pal -MIN
kyj ran KAMM r. 0 frerr, ImenteMs
a60
, 6' 10 6. a,
PARKING'SB SB TRAVEL TVVLT / LT NB TRAVEL NB- PARKINJ
LANE BIKE BIKE LANE
LANE LANE
BROOKSHIRE AVE
CHEROKEE DR TO 3RD ST
wriq l�111111 illlliiilililiiiiiiiiiiiall�ilili�'llilyilillilililliiiiiiiiillI Im I mi 11
BROOKSHIRE AVENUE IOWA STREET TO IMPERIAL HIGHS"jAV
Planned Bicycle Facility: Class 11 Bike Lane with Road Diet
Most Constrained Roadway Curb -to -Curb Width: Approx. 56'
81 51 10, 10, 10, 5' 8'
- PARKING SB —SB TRAVELI TWLT LT "'NB TRAVEL NB PARKING r
LANE BIKE BIKE LANE
LANE t"XN(F
BROOKSHIRE AVE
0
"an
56,
9 5' 10, 10, 10, 5' 13'
('ARKING SB SSE TRAVEL TWLT / LT NB TRAVEL NB PARKING—
LANE BIKE BIKE LANE
LANE LANE
COLUMBIA WY
IMPERIAL HWY TO FOSTER RD
48'
10, lo,
PARkING iiii EB TRAVEL WB TRAVEL WB PARKING
LANE BIKE BIKE LANE
LANE LANE
GALLATIN RD
KRISTIN DR TO PARAMOUNT BLVDI
IPARKINd EB ---EB RAVEL TWLT I LT -W8 TRAVEL WB PARKING
LANE BIKE BIKE LANE
LANE LANE
JR,
GALLATIN RD
PARAMOUNT BLVD TO LAKEWOOD BLVI
0 am i [a 116T, 11: 1 rf. =I- =6. 0 --m a oxylyl rag a 0 0 a
AA
so 5. 10, PAR101
— 10, 5'
— - -- �WB EB EB TRAVEL TWLT I LT WB TRAV� L WB-PARKING,
LANE BIKE BIKE LANE
LANE LANE
gr, ilill Ill
Yy d
Below provided and rendering Brookshire
1 11,14 11 V1111111 I Washisli W111 M KS [iw 1011111161 WIN I I Islip Nis M We L-4k:4 21 11111ir-K419"111 LRIFILzr-MIFING No 11MIN11 ilium
and Will De a major parf in determining ine pn%5 IAW k-
.0
Brookshire Avenue:
^� i '� @ � ' ,nr ., � � K'i S AIM' e I w � �� � � �, � t � .� R
A
.4,
z
�o
CY P"
U)
U)
LU
rz pt
w
Lu
0
U J
.
171
0.
41
N17My1�V111l1IIIC1lIIIII%I MI Wil E• 1
3m-um
I&L44"
\Vp
N
L:111
Aw
N
CATY Or CuLvan CITY
-1
5JUNINg AND 5TRIP'Nr PLAN
BUCKINGHAM PKW BOWE
HANNUM AVE AND GREEN VALLEY CIRCLE
m,"%
shw
0I
Giuseppe CanzoniaiPE, will bethe Project Manager. Hebasenior engineer with I5years ofexperience. He has
extensive experience in the field of civil street improvements, geometric design, traffic signal design, traffic control design,
pedestrian facilities, and handling municipal civil/traffic engineering -related services. Hehas also served asproject
manager and project engineer on many civil and traffic engineering design projects for several cities in Southern
Our Project Management services will include:
~ Attend a kick-off meeting with the City's Project Manager and key staff to review the project in detail and discuss
the [ity'srequirements. We want to make sure everyone involved on our team understands the work scope,
schedule, budget, and other important requirements to make the project a success.
• Ensure the scope of services is completed in a timely and professional manner.
• Attend up to five (5) meetings with City staff to review the feasibility study and at the 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100%
design stages,
• Maintain communication with the City's Project Manager throughout the duration of the project including PS&E
package status, meeting agendas and minutes, schedule updates, action items, etc.
• Maintain the project schedule, update it regularly to reflect any significant changes in the project and keep the City
informed of these changes.
• Coordinate with the City's Project Manager to resolve project related issues in a1ime|y manner. Potential complex
issues will be brought to the attention of the City's Project Manager as soon as possible.
• Provide monthly status updates for the project (assuming 5 status meetings).
• Coordinate project submittals, reviews' and approvals with the City.
° Coordinate and manage KOA'ssub-consu|tants.
•VVork Plan
°Schcdu|c
°Agcnda and minutes for each meeting
TASK 2 — FEASIBILITY STUDY& RESEARCH
TASK 2A—PRELIMINARY DESIGN MEETING
m Review the project scope ofwork.
° Coordinate the design schedule.
• Finalize the City's design parameters that will be incorporated into the project.
KQAwill work with the City 0oobtain record drawings and documents relevant Uothe project corridor. Record drawings
and documents can include, but are not limited to existing improvement plans, topographic maps, assessor maps,
centerline ties, corner records, as -built plans, utility plans, traffic counts, previous traffic studies, etc. We will send our
requests for record drawings and documents through the City's Project Manager.
Fielel Rci,iev,,
Upon rer Cipt of any avaHai-fle a)%J)ujll rLMORPS 00fil the Cily, we will visil the pluject %tie to vcn ify asid evalcmie vXIS6119
conditions. We will vprity record drawings, existing roadway geometry, striping, pavemcnit markings, signage, arid signal
dete(tion systeins. KOA will send out experienced and knowledgeablt, civil engineers to the project site to fully document
th 'Alatos field note'., 11
"Ind Ovaluatc thC exicling Sitv wl� Will d()CIrflTIC'HI the" %ej'Sit wi
Y
611d Flu kk'
Base Plan Pteparatcon
Upon completion of our field review, we will prepare accurate base plans. The base plan will show existing centerlines,
curb, right-of-way, curb ramps, driveways, pavement delineations, markings, roadside signs, and all other information that
was documented during our field review. We believe putting extra time and effort into the preparation of accurate base
plans is a critical step because they will serve as the foundation of our design. This will eliminate the need to revisit the
base plan to make changes, which can result in delays of our deliverables and the project schedule.
Assessnient of Fairy-Sical Elenients
Upon completion of the base plans of each project segment, we will assess physical elements of the roadway
infrastructure that will be affected by the bike lane striping and road diets ,,pe16;
dt•L,` Or. The feasibility study in Task 2.5 will include a physical feasibility to determine whether bike lanes and a road diet
will be feasible in the existing roadway.
During our field review, we make note of all bus stop stops along the roadway segments. We will factor the bus stops into
the bike lane/road diet design feasibility.
KOA planning staff will work hand -in -hand with its design staff to develop a comprehensive feasibility study that will
assess all operation and anticipated roadway impacts due to bike lane implementation. KOA understands that road
diet/bicycle lane implementation can be controversial as that typically means a reduction in vehicle capacity and increased
traffic delay for motorists. As was the case in Los Angeles for a 2.1-mile stretch of road diet along Vista Del Mar,
community and commuter opposition can be a powerful factor in determining whether a proposed bikeway feature is
accepted or ultimately cancelled.
24; �zen-zgn&,Wy Ay-kntkptvz-rn?��J'
vehicle operations and an assessment of existing versus with -Project conditions. KOA staff will do the following:
• Collect peak hour bicycle, pedestrian, and vehicle counts at ;2,2_ 23 intersections where there are anticipated vehicle
capacity reductions — the counts would be collected during the AM and PM weekday and Saturday midday peak
periods,
• Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts (vehicle and bicyclist) and speed survey data will be collected at up to 30 -34
roadway segments where there are anticipated vehicle capacity reductions — these would be collected on the same
The data collected will be used to set up a Synchro analysis and conduct a vehicle delay and Level of Service analysis
to assess how the streets and intersections are operating under existing conditions and how they would operate with
KOA staff will also conduct a Level of Traffic StressaTS) analysis in order to determine the actual benefits of the
bicycle facilities — this will be critical in selling the project to any potential detractors as this will measure the
• The Synchro network and LTS analysis will be expanded to incorporate parallel corridors — this will be used to assess
their conditions before -and -after the implementation of bicycle facilities and to measure anticipated traffic diversions,
KOA staff I�44.41v-
�CAG
provide general, macro -level assumptions regarding project VMT effects and reductions,
• Six months after the completion of the project and implementation of all permanent facilities, KOA will coordinate the
lzmmcfflm��
sm��� Immsomm
Physical Feasibility
KOA will also asses the physical feasibility of the proposed bike lanes/routes. First, we will send our engineers to the field
to measure the existing roadway width and determine if there is existing on -street parking. Some corridors may have an
inconsistent roadway width so we will be sure to measure all roadway width changes. We will then develop typical cross
sections for each corridor. Depending on the existing roadway width, we will provide alternatives for each corridor. The
alternatives may show a shift in vehicle/bike lane widths or include striped buffers.
&qYW&n-n4cntal Etudiiees
'e
:1 AIIA-wili-coo-I-d4i it �'%;i q) - t I-J-e P r j'eCl t- ea III 4o r--tFa'1-fi C— d ata-'i ncf; I(I I ng, shanqes'in
vcaf-'Iiefe speed_ , -and Al~ /PM-l.r)c,Pik-l-�air-,Rv--ciela,,js :Irlii,,,it�ft-);,tT-t,-,I:tic)-rI -will be-usecl4o_44slumatp
and ener:w c of) su 1-11 Pt i af--14i e.-7-9a Sol no)---
-)urf(-_"- -tofS- "Erk'J,J__-/\C:,1, The CARK devek-,)ped -thi- ENIFAC
U-Ntirion_f AC
Cts
I � -'� I W�I�iOl F, -� " �-. t '-"� -� 't -1 . , � k'
IT! '�d� cd,:0 A, �'l i """w h,% � 11! A �-j f I I I
—11 � A �-A 1-1 r-4, ra
i A IT 11 1 k'�•J F V tl I I I T� 0J t z ir"". 1- 17- 1 1 -11 11,t1;
r'o
I fk ,I I I 1 71 ri;r 11 1 T VV
'A T "41 P 4 aJ
susial'ouble De€ iqft Pluo
v, n A w i i i y o vfi i M r, i sf --1 1 a i f i P s i 9 n l iPn nr=w rrFirernrynI
V Conduct b(dore and after pedestrian and okycle counts
Attend a Mctrci ho:-Jed trainina on sutajnable p1;-4
spa-Vf-At I ;A J >1 il I;-il 111- F)1'CJ r 1 I �P I a I - i F I ) e I a i -I will i t I c I i J t I i=
A list Of SUStainable design elements
I I r I I � 7
A detailed description of how the proposed suqalnable design elefneiii% will a0iieve thu Metio �uslahvjblv
Dcs;qn l'1c,-fotn-,zncc t'Arlri'cs
A destfipboiE of how the 1ptojt'@A will aclhlovk" r:'arh ol O'ke N91,,Jr-'1 i-lpf' 'a)rj _
Sustainable design elements reduce negative impacts on the environment. This project will be providing very extensive
bicycle facilities throughout the City of Downey and are projected to lower vehicle trips on the roads. Lowering vehicle
trips in turn should lower air pollutant emissions, greenhouse emissions, and energy use, therefore, the bicycle lanes
themselves are the sustainable design element in the project. For purposes of scope and fee, we are assuming that no low
impact developments, landscaping, stormwater improvements, roadway widening/narrowing, etc. will be part of the
project.
Conceptual Design (30% Design)
Upon completion of the project base plans, we will begin preparation of the conceptual design plans for all roadway
segments. The conceptual design plans will be used to determine conflict areas and constrained conditions and will be a
major part in determining the physical feasibility of the proposed improvements.
Task 2 Deliverables
Field Nntes and Photos
* ProJect Based Plans
* Intersection Benchmarks, Corner Records, and Monument Rectoration Records
* Sustainable Design Plan
* Feasibility Study
TASK 3 - PUBLIC OUTREACH AND PRESENTATION
KOA's planning and engineering staff is well suited to conduct comprehensive public outreach as part of project. For
A of the necessary input and establishing consensus amongst residents and project stakeholders.
For this Project, KOA is proposing conducting two public workshops once the feasibility study has been completed and all
proposed bikeway treatments have been confirmed (or close 0obeing confirmed). KOAwill implement the outreach
strategy inthe following manner:
Stakeholder Database: KOA will work with the City to establish a stakeholder database. The database will be first
established through coordination with the City from the work of ongoing projects, such as the Citywide Pedestrian
Plan and the South Downey Safe Routes to School Study. The list of stakeholders will be a starting point in reaching
Digital Outreach: In past active transportation -related projects, KOA has experienced great success in incorporating a
digital element to any outreach strategy. For this project, KOA is proposing developing an online GIS map of the
proposed bicycle facilities. All of the proposed facilities will be mapped and features for each will be added.
Furthermore, this will be an interactive map where residents and stakeholders will be allowed to provide input on
each facility. This will be useful since not all residents will be able to attend each public meeting, so it will give them
customized Project fact -sheets, event flyers, and surveys that will be used to introduce the project, market the public
outreach events, and provide another way to acquire community input. All materials will be made available in
Spanish, translated byK[}A's in-house staff.
o The project fact -sheet will discuss all project elements, the extent features' and timeline. It will also
provide links 1othe pnojectwebpage (within the [ity's website) and to the GB -online web -map
u Flyers for each public workshop will also be drafted and distributed by KOA.The flyers will beemai|edto
stakeholders whose email addresses the project team has on -hand. However, KOAstaff will distribute the
flyers at centralized community facilities such as City Hall, Libraries. Parks' commercial centeo, and other
high -activity locations throughout the City.
o For each public workshop, KOA will also draft a survey questionnaire that will be used to acquire further
input from each participant, The survey will be short, yet comprehensive and the questions will be developed
in collaboration with the City. Although the survey will be primarily used at the public workshops, a digital
version of the survey will also be made available for those who cannot attend the public meetings.
Public Workshops
KDAwill work with the City to establish public workshop parameters and format, in addition to coordinating the location,
time, and day ofthe week. Regardless offormat, each public workshop will include the following:
� Storv6nmnd'KOAunderstands thatthispnojectisadirectnesu|tofthe2O1S[itywide8icydeK4asterP|anandthvough
that project, there has been extensive outreach that was conducted and general consensus that led to its adoption.
However, by the time the public workshops take place, it will have been over five years since the community has been
= For each workshop, KOA will develop a Project Storyboard which will lay out the entire project timeline, beginning
�onnamquihn@fun�sto�repavethe0cyc|e���sterP|an,deve|opin�thep|a�the��/sacquisihmnofK4e1nrfunds
for this project, and conclude with the ongoing progress of this project.
including this at each meeting will serve as a reminder to those in attendance that the implementation of the
bicycle facilities is not a new project and that the City has been engaged at every step of the way and this is the
culmination of those efforts. The goal here would be to further establish consensus with the community and
� �Lpss3n1ions� A selected number ofproject cross sections will be provided and displayed at each public meeting.
1hese will be displayed so that attendees can view them and get an idea of huw they wolild be laid out along Vhp
proposed roadway. The boards will provide attendees the opportunity to provide input on the proposed cross
sections, Participants will be provided with stickers and any c4hervvrihng materials sothat they could provide input
KOA staff will be available to answer any questions and take notes on participant opinions and concerns,
� Presentation: KOA staff will prepare a presentation to introduce City and consultant staff, discussthe project, and
answer any questions that residents might have. The presentation will also provide residents the results. of the
feasibility study and discuss anticipated project benefits and impacts to roadways.
Sowev Oux�kmnaire,�', Surveys will bedistributed at each of the public workshops.
City Council Presentation
KOA staff will also present at a City Council meeting. At this presentation, KOA will introduce the project, discuss the
results of the feasibility study, and implementation of bicycle facilities. Staff will answer any questions and note any
concerns or issues raised by Council members. Those comments will be incorporated into the process.
°St3kPhn1dcrdatabase,
* Digital matehabhnapmmey'
* Cd|aver,-,,| matenab 0pnOjcCt f3ctsheetsuWVryquestionnaire, workshop filvers'),
Four Public VYorkshnpscxeduUngand logistics,
°YYorkshnpmateria\s(pnolrectxhnvyboard/ime|ineinfogmohiccross sections'p�-senmknn),
° Attend and peseWotone (I)City [rvnci|weeting
TASK 4 - PROJECT DESIGN AND PREPARATION OF PLANS
After the conceptual design plans have been approved by the City, we will move forward in preparing the 60% submit
package. Submittals will be made to the City at the 60%, 90%, and 100% stages. The submittal package will include: I
w Title Sheet
� General Notes Details and Typical Sections
m Signing & Striping Plans
Pavement Rehabilitation Plans Tmffi,- Signcfl S!,c*1-h Plonz
Signing and Striping Plans
KOA will prepare signing and striping plans to accommodate the proposed improvements within the project limits. The
signing and striping plans will be prepared at 1"=40' scale and will show existing and proposed street improvements,
existing signing and striping and proposed signing and striping improvements.
Pavement Rehabilitation Plans
KOA will prepare pavement rehabilitation plans to accommodate the proposed slurry seal of the existing roadway. The
plans will also show any areas of full removal and replacement of the roadway. The plans will be prepared at 1"=40' and
will show existing and proposed street improvements.
TFO*"C Signal skot'ql ple"'q
exi-,611c., -a ntl Pf--OpS'td 1jqLJJa I a nd -coriduit rurgs-,- 4he on theO ty--p-revided- a s-bui It
plans
-4ie It Ems. . The drawing's vy4i inc, I ude
-I; I ,,,, n la r.
F-0 F-[) U 4- 1 :a(JSeF, Ok- G41-se-04,144,er,-K G-A- I aa e d - 0 1 at- &- .�r t
I i al-1- 04'e-eXAe k4l-iYf-"'rA-t I �a if
rl- fA-1af;4-1 1g),
The a nti6p, a -coodk-t pqf�,Id rRq-F-C.3� I 4MI �el-Cab ne-t
push, 1,'Wton-S; ally ofh(N' Tecluvet-1
4-sr�InA ekquipn�wnl-. The
d T�avv I R f-i --VV � 11, -41d d e-e W - 11 (--) te �r s(Al'. d u I ef, --a rKI --ot4pr- f ea tu f �-e s- req, u ire C'1- by-t 11 e- C i t,�" G-C�G Fllfl I e W 4 11 E-4-F a f-N4r---S i g 14- -p LRPF
PIRn submittals at 61,%, 90% &,,41�n
J
KOA will prepare the technical specifications using the City's boilerplate template. We will use the Standard Specifications
for Public Works Construction (latest edition) and Caltrans Standard Specifications throughout the course of this project as
a basis for specification preparation. Specifications will be submitted at the 60%, 90% and 100% design stages.
Task 5 Deliverables
Specifications at the 90% and 100% design stages
TASK 6 - CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
F,
1� L-1 J_ k_� e 11 1
3 J, LJ I-L � � " � " , i", �, � ,
We will prepare and submit a cost estimate with each plan submittal to the Client. The cost estimate will be prepared
applying market construction costs for each bid item to the quantities measured using a combination of available sources
including Caltrans published data, recent bid prices from other local projects, and any other data provided for our use.
The resulting deliverable will be a line by line estimation of quantities, bid prices, sub -totals and one grand total of the
estimated cost to construct these improvements. We will update the cost estimates based on the refinement of the
quantities throughout the project.
Task 6 Deliverables
e Cost Estimates 90% and 100% design stages
f
R1
KOA will provide responses to contractor's requests for information (RFI). For purposes of scope and fee we are assuming
a total of twenty (20) RFIs (approximately two per segment) will be responded to.
At the completion of the project KOA will deliver the work products in hard copy and electronic formats. The striping planj
will be drawn in global coordinates so that they can easily be integrated in the City's GIS system.
Task 7 Deliverables
* RH loq matrix and responses
* Electronic design files
TASK 8 - PROJECT CLOSEOUT
TASK 8.1 — SUSTAINABLE DESIGN PLAN CERTIFICATION
KOA will verify that the sustainable design elements and requirements were met and file with the appropriate personal at
Metro.
As discussed in Task 2.5, KOA will conduct a before and after study to determine the operational efficiency of analyzed
intersections are roadways post -Project implementation. KOA will also collect all necessary traffic, bicycle, and pedestrian
counts (weekday and weekend) to determine the safety of those using the facilities six months after they have been
installed. All count collection will be in accordance to Metro/SCAG requirements, per Appendix A of this RFP.
At the completion of construction, KOA will prepare record drawings based on based on as -built information provided 11M
the City's Construction Manager and Contractor. I
WMIT-Xim- 117-M. 101
* Record drawings on Mylar, AutoCAD, and PDF
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL (Q/A/QC)
KOA is also committed to generating quality work products and strives to producing error -free plans. We have staff
UP -a i-Ii Dr*dUr_e_`MiC1J cluality iginr vement Ill ,&k.1w.d Ill , civil wid tr.?ffir P-maps-rimK, I
a,,i #1111AV
rouna OT revi• e or more seniorlev ecl engineers, eacn Inalvicivany wan over Twemy years OT
experience, Each reviewer confirms that plans reflect the appropriate improvement scope and conform to the approving
agency's design standards and plan format. The reviewers also verify that all plan check comments have been properly
addressed on any plan revisions we prepare. Prior to completion of the 90% PS&E, we will perform a constructability
review, which entails going out to the project site with the plans and having a detailed walkthrough of anticipated
construction activities. The goal of this exercise is to view the project from contractors prospective and identify potential
construction change orders. We will then make necessary adjustments to the plans to limit any constructability issues
iown the road.
This QA/QC approach has led to a high level of quality in our engineering plans, and we believe our firm is establishing a
strong reputation with a number of agencies for producing high quality work products. Mil Canzonieri will take the lead,
ensuring that the KOA's QA/QC process already in place is followed, and that appropriate senior staff are assigned to
review all products we prepare.
1 1111 M REMEMBER Ill M I'll! INS 11
ounded in 1987, KOA is a leading provider in civil engineering, traffic engineering, transportationplanning and
construction management services for public agencies and private sector clients. We Offer our ctients technical
� knowledge, innovative solutions and responsive se(vices. The hallmark of our success is out dedication to each and
every project andourdesineho|eavea|egacyofextraopdinarycontribudons1oourcnmmunides.Durstaffinc|udes
certified transportation planners, registered civil and traffic engineers, project/construction managers,andconstnuctiun
inspectors. With six offices located in Southern California, KOA has provided engineering services for some of the largest
public works and transportation planning projects throughout California.
ZVI VVUIIWTUTN�����
#
41 1
KOA'S KNOWLEDGE OF STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
#ur staff members have extensive experience with complete streets and
best practices, the Greenbook, and Caltrans Design Manual, which will be
useful when developing engineering plans and cost estimates. We are also
conversant with ADA, PROWAG, AASHTO, CVC and CAMUTCD guidelines
?.nd requirements.
TAHA has been providing public sector and private clients with
CEQA/NEPA Documentation
environmental impact assessment services for more than 25 years. TAHA
Air Quality Impact Reports
is a certified Minority -Owned Business Enterprise (MBE), a Disadvantaged
Noise Impact Reports
Business Enterprise (DBE), and a Small Business Enterprise (SBE). Our
Geographic Information Systems
office is located in Culver City with immediate regional access to the Santa
Socioeconomic Analysis
Monica and San Diego Freeways and the Los Angeles International Airport
(located 15 minutes away).
YEAR FOUNDED
TAHA provides an extensive range of environmental impact technical
1987
services, which include:
FORM OF THE
TAHA has prepared and managed every type of California Environmental
Limited Liability Company (LLC)
Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
document, including Initial Studies, Environmental Impact Reports,
LOCATION OF OFFICES
Environmental Assessments, and Environmental Impact Statements. We
Culver City
have completed a wide range of assignments, primarily throughout
Southern California, but also in Northern California, Arizona, Maryland,
PROJECT OFFICE LOCATION
Nevada, New Mexico, and Washington, D.C,
8522 National Boulevard, Suite 103
TAHA specializes in transportation infrastructure and planning projects,
Culver City, CA 90232
community impact assessment and community development planning.
(310) 839-4200 fax (310) 839-4201
Our transportation experience covers everything from light rail to heavy
www.webtaha.com
rail, bus yards to bicycle lanes, and highway improvements to international
taha@webtaha,com
border crossings. our real estate development projects range from large
housing and retail developments to sports stadiums. TAHA also provides
municipalities with strategic planning services related to redevelopment,
MAIN CONTACT
zoning, and CEQA compliance.
Terry A. Hayes
TAHA uses, to maximum advantage, photographs, maps, chart
Principal
(310) 839-4200
comparisons, and illustrative techniques to convey the results of findings.
taha@webtaha.com
We take pride in conducting technically complete and professional work
that facilitates policy decisions by public bodies and business decisions by
private clients, and encourages increased community knowledge.
^ Air Quality Impact Reports
" Noise Impact Reports
^ Geographic Information Systems
^ Socioeconomic Analysis
environmental planners
OUR KOA TEAM ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
KOA
Terry A Have- A,5odates LLB` uTAHAI
[0
Min Zhou, PE
Carlos Velasquez, AICIP
Task Manager
Mengzhao Hu
Giuseppe Canzonieri, PE
Jacklyn Guerra, EIT
A, 1
Giuseppe Canzonieri, PE
Carlos Velasquez, ATCP
Task Manager
Giuseppe Canzonieri, PE
Walter Okitsu, PE, PTOE, PTP
Giuseppe Canzonieri, PE
Task Manager
Anthany Wong
Jacklyn Guerra, EIT
Nicolette Seargeant
c- r �- y A. F a s , A, 1 C P
Task Manager
Je'dca. kir.'J'0-iU
AIL
GIUSEPPE CANZONIERI, PE
Project Manager, Civil Engineering (PS) Task Manager,
Feasibility Study and Public Outreach Team
MIN ZHOU, PE
Principal in Charge
WALTER OKITSU, PE, TE, PTOE. PTP
QA/C Manager
CARLOS VELASQUEZ, AICP
Feasibility Study Task Manager and Public Outreach Task Manager
MENGZHAO HU
Feasibility Study Team
BRIANNE MASUKAWA
Feasibility Study Team
JACKLYN GUERRA, EIT
Feasibility Study and Civil Engineering (PS&E) Team
ROGER PELAYO
Public Outreach Team
ANTHONY WONG
Civil Engineering (PS&E) Team
JOSEPH BERNAL
Civil Engineering (PS&E) Team
NICOLETTE SEARGEANT
Civil Engineering (SE) Team
PETER FELDMAN
Environmental Team
SAM SILVERMAN
Environmental Team
JESSICA KIRCHNER
Environmental Team
IONIC I ills
f f+ #
State s Y
�lytechnic University,
Pomona, a
Y
1reTTSTM Fe i
CA • 06
Canzonieri has performed numerous projectsi both public
f private developments thr• r fut Southern California.
considerable experience working with roadway design, traffic signal
design, signing & striping design, traffic control design, construction
specifications aY' cost estimates. He has served as project manaf d
i i i i f.', Y !# "�Y •'Y '
for Y ?r rSouthernY 'i Y.
known for qualityi il capabilities andproviding clients with
high quality constructiondocuments. He has significantn Yi'
Micr
•
ANN
Palos
• i DriveSouthf Y. i' Bike Lane Safety Project,
Rancho Palos Verdes,i,.
• Temple City Rosemead i i Safety Enhancements Design/
Study, Templec
Pavement• Culver City Rehab, Culver City, CA
• South Pasadena Pavement Rehab, South Pasadena, CA
• Santa Monica PedestrianStudy,f
• Compton WilmiY • Avenue Safe Street Pedestrian/Bike
Improvements,Y Y f n
• West Hollywood Beverly/Robertson Streetscape, West Hollywood,
• LADOTSafeRoutes to Schools -Top 50 Schools Most • - • Los
Angeles,
• Cycle Track Street Improvements on i. AvefLincoln
to 7th Street, Santa Monica,
• Culver City Green Valley Circle Y Buckingham
Improvement Project, Culver City, CA
• Culver City Duquesne Project, Culver City, CA
• Foothill Blvd Master Plan, Claremont, CA
CITY OF DOW EY I BIKE MASTER PLAN PHASE I DOWNTOWN/TRANSI I CLASS II IMPLEMENTATION 33
0 - 0�
K85 Civil Engineering, Michigan
State University, E. Lansing, MI
MS, Urban Planning, School of
Architecture, TsinghuaUniversby,
Beijing, China
BS, Urban Planning, School of
Architecture, Tongji University,
Shanghai, China
Professional Engineer (Clvl),
CA *66448
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Institute of Transportation
uncil
Executive Committee
Women's Transportation Seminar
MIN ZHOU, PE
-*'R.INCIPAL-IN-CHARGE I PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
Ms. Zhouhas 26years of transportation engineering and planning
experience with both private consultant companies and public agencies.
She isknowledgeable inroadway design, traffic design, transportation
modeling and studies, non -motorized transportation, database
management, and statistical analysis. Ms. Zhmuhas managed several
large-scale projects involving multiple stake holder groups and has
reputation ofdelivering projects on-timeandunderbudge1
^ Master Plan ofArterial Highways (NPAH)Needs5tudy,Orange
County, CA
^ City ofLong Beach Bikeway Master Plan, Long Beach, [A
^ Renaissance Specific Plan BRTraffic Analysis, Santa Ana, CA
~ Mobility Element ofthe General Plan, Long Beach, CA
^ City ofBarstow Active Transportation Pnogram(Cyc|el)Fund|ng'
Barstow, CA
~ City ofColton Active Transportation Plan, Colton, [A
~ City ofPasadena Bikeway Transportation Action Plan, Pasadena, CA
^ City ofPlacentia General Plan Update, Placentia, CA
^ LaHabra General Plan Update Traffic Study, LaHabra, CA
^ St. Jude's Hospital Master Plan, Fullerton, CA
~ D[TABikeway Strategy and Feasibility Studies for 5upervisoria|
District G.Orange County, CA
^ City ofPasadena Bikeway Analysis & Feasibility Study, Pasadena, [A
^ Broadway and Third Street Protected Bicycle Lanes Project, Long
Beach, CA
^ Long Beach Pine Avenue StreetncapeProject, Long8each,CA
^ City ofPasadena Avenue 64Complete Streets Project Conceptual
Designs, Pasadena, CA
~ OCTAOrange County Bikeway Loop Planning Support, Orange
County, CA
^ Daisy Avenue Corridor Bicycle Boulevard PSfkEDesign, Long Beach,
[A
BA,Geography/Environmental
California, Los Angeles, CA
Planners
..+
�, t
.a
ti S 3 r AMP, t i
and the City of Lancaster Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. He has experience
in working with downtown associations and businesses to develop and
the commercialdistrict.#'rience in a number ofplanning
studies that have addressed transportation planning for existing and
planned rail transit stations and transit -oriented districts.
Mr. Vel6squez has worked on projects addressing bikeway planning and
safety education, pedestrian circulation, First Last Mile, Tactical Urbanism,
complete operations, # and economic
revitalization. He is also preparing a Safety Corridor Plan for Huntington
Drive i and .Complete.. • w #Study'
City. Mr. Vel6squez has led walk audits at Metro stations and managed
the implementation of a tactical urbanism pilot project to address
pedestrian safety on C6sar Ch6vez in Boyle Heights. As a LCI, he has led
bicycle safety education courses for adults and children throughout Los
Angeles #
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
. Bell Gardens Complete Streets Plan, Bell Gardens, CA
American Planning Association
. Commerce Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Commerce, CA
. Overland Avenue Complete Streets Feasibility Study, Culver City, CA
Urban Land Institute
. Huntington .. SafeStreetsi • • Plan,. ' • CA
Young# •
MontereyPark Atlantic Improvements
Transportation
. 2015 Cycle 2 Active Transportation Program Grant Application -
Rosemead i' BoulevardComplete Streets Improvements#-.
League Certified Instructor (LCI),
Angeles County, CA
League of American Bicyclists
. 2015 Cycle 2 Active Transportation Program Grant Application -
Temple Avenue Complete Streets Improvements, Los Angeles Coun
1
. Los Angeles River Bikeway Feasibility Study, Los Angeles County
• • # • i • + • i • • • 1..
Metr
. Safe Routes to School Plans for the Top 50 Schools wit ost Need
City of Los Angeles Department Of Transportation, CA
CITY OF DOWNEY I BIKE MASTER PLAN PHASE 1DOWNTOWN/TRANSIT CLASS 11 IMPLEMENTATION 35
EDUCATION
MS, Transportation Engineering,
University of California, Berkeley, CA
BS, Civil Engineering, California State
University, Los Angeles, CA
BS, Math -Computer Science,
University of California, Los Angeles
REGISTRATION
Prof. Engineer (Traffic), CA #1406
Prof. Engineer (Civil), CA #52655
Prof. Traffic Operations Engineer (PTOE)
Professional Transportation Planner
(PTP)
EDUCATION
MS, Planning, University of
Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
BS, Urban Planning, Tongji
University, Shanghai, China
QA/QC MANAGER I SENIOR ENGINEER
Mr. Okitsu is a Co -Founder and a Principal of KOA. Mr. Okitsu has extensive
experience in transportation planning and traffic design over a wide variety
of highway, transit way, and bikeway projects. This includes designs for traffic
signals, street lighting, signing & striping, worksite traffic control. He has field
and managerial experience on traffic impact, feasibility analysis, and circulation
projects.
• Westside Area Bikeway Master Plan, LACMTA, Los Angeles County, CA
• Southeast Area and Central Area Bikeway Master Plan Projects, LACMTA,
Los Angeles, CA
• 30th Street West Complete Streets Call for Projects 2015 Application,
Cities of Palmdale and Lancaster and the County of Los Angeles, CA
• Long Beach Broadway and Third Street Cycle Track Design, Evaluation, and
Modification, Long Beach, CA
• San Diego Uptown Active Transportation Design, San Diego, CA
• Pier J Bike and Pedestrian Path, Port of Long Beach, CA
• Los Angeles Countywide Bicycle Policy Document, Los Angeles, CA
• Exposition Right -of -Way Bikeway Conceptual Design, for City of Santa
Monica, Santa Monica, CA
_1 N��t1ii111
FEASIBILITY STUDY TEAM I SENIOR PLANNER
Ms. Hu is a Senior Planner with 13 years working experience. She specializes in
the application of transportation models for larger infrastructure projects. Her
modeling work encompasses numerous large transit projects, including three
New Starts projects, where she has worked intensively with the most commonly
used regional travel demand model travel demand models in Southern California,
including the Metro Model, OCTAM, and the ROTC travel forecasting model. She
has been involved in every aspect of travel demand model application procedures:
network coding, model calibration and validation; and model application for AA
EIS submittals. She is familiar with transportation modeling software, including
Viper, Tranplan, TP+, EMME, and TransCAD. She is also proficient with GIS and
data processing packages, such as R-script. Before joining KOA, Ms. Hu was a lead
planner with Parsons Brinckerhoff.
�i3�:7��11�►[yJ
• Los Angeles County Transportation Authority Model Enhancement, Los
Angeles, CA
• Los Angeles County Transportation Authority Mode Choice Model Final
Revalidation, Los Angeles, CA
• Los Angeles County Transportation Authority Airport Connector
TIAT# ► . ■
EDUCATION
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona, CA
Minor, Geographic Information
Systems, California State
PUBLIC OUTREACH TEAM I SENIOR PLANNER
Mr. Pelayo has more than 12 years of experience specializing in sustainable
tr-2xs�*rt?ti,#% aA�d its re_-Whz*skiF.Ai urb.-i-ftrAij, ixclusive*f -,*e,_�estri?*/k)icyclist
b@Vaviori glis.11 iiijilti iii jiget and urban desi n ri ractice. H mirih and o
17ffi�YA17MM177. 9 -
facilitation skills, both in English and Spanish. Community outreach is a key
c*v#,&A-eAt -tf Rtgelit's w*rk, 2*4 iA�,ut
focus groups, and interactive workshops has shaped all of the projects he is
involved in. His experience in multimodal projects has shaped his focus on the
meaningful integration of community outreach and consensus building into the
design process from concept to implementation.
• Ontario Active Transportation Master Plan, Ontario, CA
• Montclair SRTS & ATP Master Plans, Montclair, CA
SCAG Go Human Inland Empire (Ontario, Chino, Lake Elsinore, Riverside), CA
* SCAG Morongo Basin Active Transportation Master Plan, San Bernardino
County
* City of Wildomar Grand Avenue Bike Improvements is Multi -Purpose Trail
Improvements Project, Wildomar, CA
* City of Barstow Active Transportation Plan, Barstow, CA
* City of Colton Active Transportation Plan Colton, CA
PETER FELDMAN
ENVIRONMENTAL TEAM
Mr. Feldman has managed/worked on a number of Caltrans projects. He
has approximately 10 years of experience as an environmental planner
and project manager specializing in California Environmental Quality Act/
National Environmental Policy Act (CEQA/NEPA) documents, community
impact assessments (CIAs), and Section 4(f)/6(f) documentation. Mr. Feldman
incorporates a multitude of data sources in conducting community -based
transit modeling, and regional growth forecasts. His responsibilities at TAHA
include project management, environmental justice/Title VI, Section 4(f), traffic
and transportation.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• Firestone Boulevard/1-710 Interchange Project, South Gate, CA
• Riverside Avenue Grade Separation at UPRR Crossing, Riverside, CA
• NERA Delegation Support and Strategy, Sacramento, CA
• Newberry Materials Site Water Quality and CIA (Contract 1BA1521
San Bernardino, CA
• On -Call Environmental Services (Contract No. 08A1169), Riverside and San
Bernardino Counties, CA
MS, University of California,
Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
OJI
1-1pigiJIMM. RM
1 in 0 r. 11 ev 1 r. mt-M. I a I lra 0 -N I I IV 1 F M-NU
ENVIRONMENTAL TEAM
TECHNICAL TASK MANAGER FOR CEQA/NEPA DOCUMENTATION
Task Manager I Sub - Terry A. Hayes Associates Inc.
NE AD E NTATION
i lifornia
i L�P li y ' atep nc OCU M
c
I - in•n Ca Mr. Silverman has over 18 years of experience specializing in California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
assessments for transportation projects. He specializes in air quality, greenhouse
gas (GHG) and noise assessments. Mr. Silverman has expert knowledge of the]
afto-ms.Standard Environ i, ii i i:� ii i a �- R i::- :1 r 1::! 11 11!1:!
many Caltrans Local Assistance Projects.
• Los Angeles River Valley Bikeway and Greenway Project — Vanalden Avenue
to Balboa Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA
• aylor Yard Bikeway & Pedestrian Bridge, Los Angeles, CA
• Broadway Streetscape Master Plan, Los Angeles, CA
• Poplar Corridor Safety Improvement Project, San Mateo, CA
• Burbank Channel Bikeway, Burbank, CA
• City of Los Angeles Sidewalk Repair Program, Los Angeles, CA
• La Brea Greenbelt Urban Forestry Project, Los Angeles, CA
ummm�
AIVAUSNIGIIIIIIIALIEZ4
REFEREN
Maryam Babaki,
Director of Public Works
Development Servic
(323) 722-48
nAe �kll"
TYPES OF WORK
PERFORMED
Outreach
Multi -Modal Planning
Planning
STAFF
Carlos Vel6squez
Walter Okitsu
Roger Pelayo
COMMERCE, CA
KO A - Prime Consultant
will o so by not only taking into account the active transportation needs of
the residents but also the goods movement infrastructure, traffic, and busine
needs.
CLIENT NAME City of Colton Active Transportation Plan
City of Colton COLTON, CA
KOA -- Prime Consultant
REFERENCE
Victor Ortiz
Project Manager
Colton, CA 92324
(909) 370-5065
TYPES OF WORK
PERFORMED
Citywide ATP
Caltrans ATP Cycle I Grant
Public Participation
v 4
r1drTleavroTril rvuli 7 Wal
Infrastructure & Non -
infrastructure Programs
California Transportation
Commission
ATP Guidelines
AWARDS
Inland Empire Section
Merit Award
(Transportation Planning)
Grant Guidelines. While working on the plan, KOA prepared an ATP Cycle 3
grant application for the City.
Mori me M-5m am,
REFERENCE
Domingo D.Gonzales,
Engineering Services
Administrator
220E. Mountain View Street
Suite
Barstow, CA923II
(760)255-5156/(760255'1417
dgooza|es@baotow/ca.org
PERFORMED
Active Transportation Program
Bicycle Routes
Transit
Complete Streets
Street Calming
Road Diets
Unified Multi -modal Strategy
Safety Improvements for
Recommended Bike/Ped
Network
End -of Trip Facilities
Ped Facilities
Promotion of Biking/Walking
ity of Barstow Active Transportation Pla
BARSTOW, CA i
bikeable, transit -oriented community by increasing physical activity, lowering
rates of traffic -related injuries, reducing air pollution, improving mobility for
non -drivers, increasing economic development, and improving the safety of
the community. The KOA team provided public outreach, research, analysis,
civil engineering, the final plan, and assistance for the approval of the final
rof f, "I III iff
CLIENT NAME
Southern California Association
of Governments
REFERENCE
Courtney Aguirre
Senior Regional Planner
(213) 236-1804
aguirre@scag.ca.gov
YEAR
2016 - 2018
CONTRACT
$150,000
TYPES OF WORK
PERFORMED
Outreach
Intersection Design
Community Planning
Plan Adoption
KEY STAFF
Walter Okitsu
Carlos Velasquez
Brianne Masukawa
Huntington Drive Safe Streetsr • Plan
SAN MARINO, CA
KOA - Prime Consultant
SLAG (Southern California Association of Governments) received a Sustainable
Communities Transportation Grant from the State of California to develop
a safe streets plan intended to encourage multi -modal access and improve
safety along Huntington Drive through the City of San Marino. KOA conducted
outreach to residents, city staff, businesses, and the local schools to assess
their concerns and propose effective solutions consistent with the community's
priorities and needs. KOA collected traffic, bicycle, pedestrian, and collision
data to evaluate existing conditions and proposed improvements to provide a
safe corridor. The KOA team also worked with the schools to organize bicycle
rodeos and age -appropriate bicycle safety education courses for students.
KOA provided a plan document which satisfied Caltrans' grant requirements
and the City's project expectations.
CLIENT NAME Culver City 2019 Pavement Rehabilitation Project
City of Culver City CULVER CITY, CA
REFERENCE
Diana Szymanski
Project Manager
B10253'5623
TYPES OF WORK
PERFORMED
Cost Estimates
Street Improvement Plans
Signing EkStriping Plans
Traffic Signal Plans
Cost Estimates
Bike Lane Design
KEY STAFF
Givaeppe[anzonieh
VVa|terOWtsu
]mch|ynGuena
Joseph Bernal
Anthony Wong
rehabilitation and median modifications along Overland Ave between
k%lA providedengineering services tothe City street improvement
CLIENT NAME South Pasadena FY 2018-2019 Street Improvement
City of South Pasadena SOUTH PASADENA, CA
KOA - Prime Consultant
REFERENCE
Alex Chou
(626) 403-7240
00��
I YPES OF WORK
PERFORMEW,
Engineering Design
Pavement Rehabilitation
Curb and Gutter ReMac!4twwl,
Sidewalk Reconstruction
Signing and Striping
Bike Lane Design
KEY STAFF
GiusepA,e Cz.kz*Tkieri
Min Zhou
Anthony Wong
• I Segment Alta Vista Avenue between Oak Crest Avenue and Mountain
View Avenue (150 LF)
• Segment 2 — Monterey Road between West City Limit and Arroyo Verde
Road (1,000 LF)
• Segment 3 — Monterey Road between Arroyo Verde Road and Pasadena
Avenue (1,800 LF)
• Segment 4 — Forest Avenue between Mission Street and Cul-de-Sac (280
LF)
• Segment 5 — Sterling Place between Grand Avenue and Cl- -Sac (720
LF)
. . . . . . . . . . .
The project scope of work consists of a preparation of plans, specifications and
estimates (PS&E).
CITY OF DOWNEY I BIKE MASTER PLAN PHASE I DOWNTOWN/TRANSIT CLASS 11 IMPLEMENTATION 47
CLIENT NAME Pico Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Improverneril.
City of Santa Monica SANTA MONICA, CA
KOA - Prime Consultant
REFERENCE
Joseph SanClemente, PE, AICP
(310) 458-2204
TYPES OF WORK
PERFORMED
Public Outreach
Civil and Traffic
Engineering Design
KEY STAFF
Giuseppe Canzonieri
Carlos Vel6squez
KOA is providing the City of Santa Monica with civil and traffic engineering
defqn--str,�k-e34ii-thre ?1eeo U'OfeWdil efl- '
The project includes: alternatives analysis, public outreach, preparation of
plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for pedestrian improvernents, at
five locations along Pico Boulevard, and construction support, The project
locations are: I
• Pico Boulevard & 17th Street
• Pico Boulevard & 19th Street
• Pico Boulevard & 21st Street
• Pico Boulevard & 22nd Street
• Pico Boulevard & Cloverfield Boulevard
mmm2im N174 a . 0 , 0 a .
I $I I x;l7grA I I A I X. I•9-TiTefft-i — --------
CLIENT NAME
City of Claremont
REFERENCE
Vincent Ramos
Associate Engineer
(909) 399-5395
vramos@ci.claremont.ca.us
YEAR
2018
CONTRACT
Projected Budget $1.5 million
TYPES OF WORK
PERFORMED
Engineering Design
Cost Estimates
PS&E
Construction Support
Bio-Swale Design
KEY STAFF
Stephen Bise
Giuseppe Canzonieri
Walter Crkitsu
Eric Yang
Anthony Wong
Joseph Bernal
Claremont Foothill Boulevard Master Plan PS&--:
CLAREMONT, CA
REUNION
1*1J.#11VaMk4t"3 PX14GUO
roadway improve rnents, bio-s es, storm drains, bicycle lanes, separate
bicycle lanes, intersection bulb -outs, median and parkway landscaping, traffic
signal modification, sidewalk improvements, and street/peclestrian lighting,
MINOR OW11111111111111
CITY OF DOWNEY I BIKE MASTER PLAN PHASE I DOWNTOWN/TRANSIT CLASS Il IMPLEMENTATION 50
Broadway Streetscape
TAHA prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for CEQA and an
Master Plan
Environmental Assessment for NEPA for the streetscape improvement
LOS ANGELES, CA
along Broadway in Downtown Los Angeles. The Master Plan focused on
transportation, urban planning and design, historic preservation, economic
Sub - Terry A. Hayes A ssocia tes
development, and infrastructural improvements along Broadway. The
environmental analysis included an assessment of construction -related traffic
impacts, visual impacts, air quality emissions, and noise levels.
Los Angeles River Valley TAHA is preparing an environmental documentation for a bike trail proposed
Bikeway & Greenway along the Los Angeles River. The project area encompasses San Fernando
Valley from Vanalden Avenue to Forest Lawn Drive/Zoo Drive. The bike trail is
Design Completion Project approximately 12.5 miles of new bike path and greenway facilities along the Los
LOS ANGELES, CA Angeles River in San Fernando Valley. The trail will complement and connect to
Sub - Terry A. Hayes Associates projects that have already been built or are underway.
Taylor Yard Bikeway
And Pedestrian Bridge
Project
LOS ANGELES, CA
Sub - Terry A. Hayes Associates
• a. - 6 Al 4111JUS- - I - a a a .
q4 • 1.• 1181- . . . I .
MrOMYTO IN a
on the north, a bikeway would be constructed along Kerr Road to connect to
San Fernando Road. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was the federal lead
agency for the proposed project.
[4 11 W& 01 J U9*YJTJ 0 A A
EXHIBIT "B"
rTf
OM f
FEE PROPOSAL
CITY OF DOWNEY
BIKE MASTER PLAN PHASE 1 DOWNTOWN/TRANSITCLASS IIIMPLEMENTATION
KOM4A
DELIVERABLES
HoUdy Rates $fully Burdened}
®®
. ,r,
Kick• Ulf MA vluw - - - -
4
- - _
-- -4
8
$25 00
$1,465 00
Design Submittal Meetings (5)
20
20
40
$12500
$6,22500
p General Proiect Management
24
I
24
$4,320,00
SUBTOTAL
48
20
4
72
$150.00
$22,010.00
Pre^ltnnnnryl,)ft°.ignMrO'np
4
4
8
$2500
11.24500
Records Research
2
16
�
_ 19
_.._ _
__$1,96000
Field Review
40
U��
Iy�
a s;r,
360
$SQ0.00
$45,48000
Base
asesPlan Prep ratio
C'
Zo
$45,480 00
p al Elements
4
d
16
$2,32000
IC Utilities and Transit Conflict E
4
16
20
$2,32000
FeasibilityStudy
I
Feasibility
Operationaleasi ili (LOS, LTS)+Counts
.
48
1
�iP
Jl .
320
i, B.w,0.�t�no
$53,98000
y
8
24
40
l
76
$9,30000
Sustainable Design Plan
.i "'
(
6
20
$3,60000
Feasibility Report h
4
24
40
24
92
$14,78000
Conceptual Design (30%Design)
12
16
160
160
24
372
143.860.00
5UBTOTAL�
56
138
556
568
128
2213
1674
$13,525.00
$222,545.00
4
16
20
$a".'d:g00
Stakholder Database
Collateral Materials (Fact Sheet, Flyers, Online Map, Survey)
2
4
16
80
102
,5? 'F0
$11,79000
t Workshop Logistics, Set -Up, Attendance
158
Sx ;,) 00
$21,170.00
Workshop Materials + Documentation
8
HG ,
Si:
92
111,44000
Council Meetings
4
4
4
8
20
TT:' Po
$3,15000
SUBTOTAL
12
34
16
8
74
248
392
$250,00
$49,870X0
60! Design Plans
40
80
160
440
$59,00004
90%Design Plans
24
40
80
72.0�
224
$30,36000
100%Design Plans I
12
24
40
116
$15,90000
SUBTOTAL
76
244
280
780
$105,260.00
y p
90. speofi(alimtt.
6
20
8
34
_
__ $5,890.00
100%Specifications
2
8
4
14
1
$237000
SUBTOTAL
8
28
12
48
$Q260,66
a
90%Cost Estimates
1
4
24
n
_ $333500
100% Cost Estimates
1
2
8
11
1
11.375.00
SUBTOTAL I
2
6
32
40
$4,710,00
x
H
16
24
$3,440,00
Requests for Information(RFI)
GIS Integration
8
8
$80000
SUBTOTAL
8
16
8
92
$4,240.00
. f_
*Sustainable
1=0200
Design Plan Certification
'A
4
S72000
After Study
A:
12
70
118
$13,00000
$28,40000
Record Drawings
4
8
16
28
$3,90000
SUBTOTAL
16
12
12
16
y�y
24 P
70
ISO
t $13,000.00
$33,020.00
TOTAL BASE SE VICESI _
170
428
912
904 !
230
554
3188
$26,925.00
$439.915.00 B
-NOTE: FEE IS NEGOTIABLE PRIOR TO EXECUTION OF SERVICE AGREEMENT