The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05. CIP 17-14- Approve Amd No. 1 to Cooperative Agmt w-County of LA-Traffic Mgmt Ctr Upgrade Phs 2MOO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COU21T Y MANAGER FROM: • OF BY: DELFINO R. CONSUNJI, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENG NEER DATE: • 201 That the City Council: 1. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperative Agreement with the County of Los Angeles for the Traffic Management Center Upgrade Phase 2, Capital Improvement Project No. 17-14; and 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperative Agreement with the County of Los Angeles in a form approved by the City Attorney; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute any and all future amendments to said Cooperative Agreement in a form acceptable by the City Attorney. The City is in the process of upgrading the Traffic Management Center (TMC). The upgrade is occurring in two phases with the first phase consisting of the video wall replacement, which was completed in 2017. The second phase consists of upgrading the Traffic Control System (TCS). The TCS is a computerized database bf the City's traffic signals. The TCS both stores the signal timing parameters and allows the user to both download and upload the timing data remotely from the TMC. In addition, the status of the signals' operations can be monitored remotely through the system. The TCS also facilitates traffic management, operations and maintenance by providing staff the capability of remote surveillance of signalized intersections throughout the City. The TCS is connected to the TMC via the City's fiber optic communications network. The existing TCS, which was originally installed in 2005 is no longer supported and, therefore, has reached the end of its useful life. In addition, the hardware and communication devices which drive the TCS are outdated. Upon identifying the need to upgrade the TMC video wall, TCS and associated hardware and communication devices, staff met with representatives from both the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) and the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works (County) to seek funding assistance for said upgrades. The County indicated that funding was available to cover approximately 80% of the cost of the TMC upgrade, consisting of unspent grant funds previously obtained through the Metro Call for Projects discretionary CIP No. 14-17, Phase 2 - Traffic Management Center Video Wall Upgrade Project Approve Amendment No.1 April 9, 201 transportation funding process. Subsequently, the County initiated a cooperative agreement with the City for the initial phase of the TMC upgrade (video wall replacement) which specified the terms and conditions of the funding as well as the responsibilities of both parties for the upgrade. Based on the County's direction, the City first proceeded with the video wall upgrade and would subsequently complete the second phase, the TCS upgrade, through a separate project of which the County would also fund 80% through an amendment to the Cooperative Agreement pertaining to the video wall upgrade. MSKGJ►1 Staff has since completed the selection process of the TCS vendor, which consisted of a Request for Proposals (RFP) process and evaluation of demonstration "leave behind" systems of the vendors initiated in 2016. Proposals were received from four vendors (Kimley-Horn, Econolite, Transcore and McCain, Inc.) and were subsequently evaluated by staff based on project understanding, approach and traffic control system capabilities; project team's availability, vendors experience of subconsultants overall quality of the proposal and cost effectiveness. The final scores of the four vendors are as follows: Vendor Score Amount McCain, Inc. 4.34 $248,014 Transcore 4.06 $355,782 Econolite 4.00 $309,628 Kimley-Horn 3.88 $550,900 The firm McCain, Inc. was subsequently selected based on the vendor's traffic control system capability, experience, cost effectiveness and ease of use of vendors system. Based on the proposal received from the preferred vendor, McCain Inc., the estimated cost of the TCS upgrade is $273,000. The TCS upgrade project consists of development of concept and final design plans and specifications, software and hardware procurement and installation, implementation, acceptance testing, documentation and training, one-year warranty and three- year support and maintenance. The final scope -of -work is currently being negotiated with McCain, Inc. The Professional Services Agreement with McCain, Inc. will be brought before the City Council for approval separately within the next few months. Through the proposed amendment (see Attachment "A") to the original County agreement (see Attachment "B") which funded 80% of the first phase of the TMC upgrade, the County will also fund 80% of the cost of the TCS upgrade. Staff recommends the approval of said amendment. Upon the approval of the attached amendment, County staff will forward the amendment to the Board of Supervisors for approval. It is anticipated that the second phase of the TMC Upgrade will be fully operational in September 2019. K CIP No. 14-17, Phase 2 - Traffic Management Center Video Wall Upgrade Project - rove Amendment No. 1 April 9, 2019 Quality of Life, Infrastructure and Parks FISCAL IMPACT The total estimated cost of this project, including procurement of materials, design, installation, integration, testing, documentation, training, contingency and warranty is $273,000. Sufficient funds have been budgeted in the FY 2018-19 Capital Improvement Program, consisting of $54,600 in Gas Tax Funds as the 20% local match in Account No. 30-17834 and $218,400 to be reimbursed by the County in Account No. 26-17834. ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT A — AMENDMENT NO. 1 ATTACHMENT B — COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 9 referredThis AMENDMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF DOWNEY, a municipal corporation and charter city In the County of Los Angeles to ithe COUNTY t LOS ANGELES, a political subdivision of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as COUNTY): WITNESSETH I H TTS � � * `• •` � i''r � 'f • .• f • • • ' i is f • i ' r � a _ . .. _ _ `. c vi - •14441110114 am 11111IIIIIIII1712701M MAINT • WHEREAS, CITY desires toupgrade its Traffic Signal• • •' and hardware (hereinafter referred to as UPGRADE) as summarized in Attachment B; and UPGRADE t • and will be utilized jurisdictional CITY,and WHEREAS, CITY f COUNTY desire to amend AGREEMENT to provide f. for ''r . • 71HEREAS, the totalcost of UPGRADE . to be TwoHund -F Seventy-three Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($273,000.00); and WHEREAS, the cost of UPGRADE includes the costs of the procureme administration, Traffic Signal Controlsoftware,f 3 years of vendor maintenance and support for UPGRADE, w c, r f • and WHEREAS, a secured f obtained grant : ri •: m Los Angel County Metropolitan Authority (LACMTA) to finance eighty percent (80%) of cost UPGRADE • a maximum of • Hundred Eighteen. Four Hundred ans 00 /100 Dollars i aftii and WHERTAS, CITY is willing to finance the remaining twenty percent (20%)matching fun s for LACMTA grant up to Fifty-four Thousand Six Hundred and 00/1011i Dollars ($54,600.00) and any cost in excess of Two Hundred Seventy-three Thousani, and 00/100 Dollars ($273,000.00); and WHEREAS, UPGRADE is consistent with the scope of work for traffic improvements within CITY pursuant to Memorandum of Understanding No. POOF3309 W�etween COUNTY and LACMTA; and *Wb remain in full force and effect unless specifically amended herein: Section (1), the following new paragraph f., replaces existing paragraph f.; and tha following new paragraphs g. through m. are added; h. To prepare the necessary environmental document and make the requir environmental finding in compliance with the California Environmental Quali Act for UPGRADE. i. To furnish COUNTY with information on all contract change orders for UPGRADE and obtain COUNTYS prior approval of all such contract change orders. j. To submit an invoice to COUNTY for eighty percent (80%) of cost for UPGRADE up to a maximum of Two Hundred Eighteen Thousand Four Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($218,400.00), within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days after the final acceptance of UPGRADE subject to paragraph below. k. To finance twenty percent (20%) of the matching funds for UPGRADE up to Fifty-four Thousand Six Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($54,600.00) and any cost of UPGRADE in excess of Two Hundred Seventy-three Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($273,000.00). 1. To administer procurement and installation of UPGRADE in accordance with all regulations and requirements of LACMTA relating to the expenditure of Proposition C Local Return funds and Proposition C twenty-five percent (26%) Discretionary funds. CITYS records for UPGRADE shall be open to inspection and subject to audit and reproduction by the COUNTY and LACMTA, or any of 71 all IFIN $T;V� 1117-11145101111 F-5-1 Ireall . . . . . . . . . . c. To secure and obtain LACMTA grant funds to be used to finance eighty percent (80%) of the cost of UPGRADE up to Two Hundred Eighteen Thousand Four Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($218,400.00). f. To deposit with CITY, following completion of UPGRADE and upon demand 11my-- r t the ai c CITY, sufficient COUNTY funds to finance eighty percent ( 80%) a 'tu4 cost of UPGRADE by utilizing LACMTA grant funds up to a maximum amou of Two Hundred Eighteen Thousand Four Hundred and 00/100 Dolla ($218,400.00). Said demand will consist of billing invoices prepared by Cl indicating the actual cost of UPGRADE, as determined by a final accounting UPGRADE. I Section (3), the following new paragraph h., replaces existing paragraph h.; and the following new paragraphs 1. through r. are added; h. Any correspondence, communication, or contact concerning this AMENDMENT shall be directed to the following: CITY: Mr. Delfino Consunji Director of Public Works City of Downey Department of Public Works P.O. Box 7016 Downey, CA 90241-7016 COUNTY: Mr. Mark Pestrella Director of Public Works County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works P.O. Box 1460 Alhambra, CA 91802-1460 1. Total cost • SYSTEM is Three Hundred • Thousand and 00/1011, Dollars ($386,000.00). n. The cost of procurement administration, as referred to in this AMENDMENT, shall consist of the costs of environmental documentation; and all other necessary work prior to awarding of UPGRADE for construction bids and shall include currently effective percentages added to total salaries, wages, and equipment costs to cover overhead, administration, and depreciation in connection with any and all of the aforementioned items. o. During implementation of UPGRADE, CITY will furnish an inspector or other representative to perform the functions of an inspector. COUNTY may also furnish, at • • to CITY, a • • other representative to assist in the integration of UPGRADE. COUNTY will have no obligation to inspect UPGRADE. COUNTY will not have any liability for claims or actions brought by third parties based on COUNTY'S alleged inspection or failure to inspect UPGRADE. CITY will defend, indemnity, and hold harmless COUNTY as to claims and actions by third parties against COUNTY based on COUNTY'S alleged inspection or failure to inspect UPGRADE. The orders of CITY inspector to the contractor • any other person in charge • construction of the UPGRADE will prevail and be final. The CITY inspector will be responsible for the proper inspection of UPGRADE as needed. p. COUNTY shall not be liable for any costs for UPGRADE that do not conform the regulations and requirements of LACMTA, as referred to in paragra above. I r. The cost of UPGRADE, as referred to in this AMENDMENT, shall consist of the actual payments to the contractor(s) for UPGRADE. ir-mum IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AMENDMENT to be executed by their respective officers, duly authorized by the CITY OF DOWNEY on , 2019, and by the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES on ,2019. am In Maria Alicia Duarte m -W, -a-Aa-gem-entCons-u—Itant City Clerk Em3mammummm a FOKWKSIJr•� C VEJ�4�,Tjryrzml By Yvette M. Abich Garcia City Attorney Technical Plans Traffic Controller Hardware and Software System Hardware System Implementation Acceptance Testing Support/Warranty $30,000 $114,300 $22,000 $3,400 $1,200 $25,500 $27,600 Subtotal _ $248,200 Contingencies $24,800 0.411L F. Dimdor =111A ZA3*1 I 3k-1 a$) a Ulu: IN NAVIIIIJ MI, -To Efftch LAPes VwDugh BkCave and GNM service - 9W SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE AL RA. CALIFORNIA 919D31331 T&IW4ft (M) 458-510D http:/1dPW.4—tY.9DV The Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Los Angeles 313 Kenn6th Hahn Hall 0 Xlministraftn 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 ADDRESS ALL COVISM.NDENCE TO V 0, BOX 100 ALKAM&R.A, 902%146D IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE F1 soul --1 -4 k 32 December 13, 2016 LORI GLASGOW EXECUTIVE OFFICER ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 3973 AUTHORIZING HIGHWAYS -THROUGH -CITIES FUNDING AND APPROVE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DOWNEY AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO UPGRADE THE CITY'S VIDEO WALL (SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT 4) (4 VOTES) a -1111KII0111111to 4, AT tile U t L I lifornia Environmental Quality Act. 1. Find that this project to provide funds to upgrade the City of Downey's video wall is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental ualityAct. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 3973 to find that the upgrade to the City of Downey's video wall located entirely within the City is of general County interest and thal the County of Los Angeles will provide of Metropolitan Transportation Authority grant funds to the City with the local matching funds being provided by the City to be expended in accordance with all applicable provisions of law relating to funds derived from Proposition C sales tax. The Honorable Board of Superviso 12/13/2016 Page 111 111 J 11 1111,111 101411 Ix I s The Countywide Strategic Plan directs the provisions of Operational Effectiveness/Fiscal Sustainability (Goal 1) and Integrated Services Delivery (Goal 3). The residents of the City and unincorporated area who travel on the roadways of Downey will benefit by this enhancement to the City's video wall. + r There will be no impact to the County General Fund. totalThe • to upgrade to •-r wall is estimated to be $113,000 and will be financed with a maximum of $89,000 in the LosAngeles County Metropolitanp . •: Authority Call for Projects Proposition C Discretionary• •r the Gateway Citiesr • and $24,000 in City match funds. Financing for the upgrade to • • wall is included in the Fiscal Year2016-17 ••• • Local• Budget. FACTS.. +. typesSections 1680-1683 of the California Streets and lHighways Code provide that the Board of any County may, by a resolution adopted by a four-fi I hs vote of its members, determine that certain of •.d improvemenare of general Co it >interest and that County• shall be extended therefore. The enclosed Resolution No. 3973, if adopted by four-fifths vote of the Board as required by Section 6:1 of • nia Streets andHighways•• • • •- o • • - • • - •rm • •i • • - • - •• .• • - •-•I. agreement,The been reviewed and a•proved as to form by •unty Counsel, provides f• - City to perform procurement r -• •n, contract administration,and all videoother work necessary to upgrade the City's video wall. The agreement establishes the County contribution to the City for actual expenditures not to exceed $89,000 toward the cost to upgrade the wall. The City will finance the local match to the grant and any projectcostsover $113,000. 12/13/2016 Page 3 MEMMUM ilk There will be no impact on current County services or projects during the performance of ft'. recommended services, including the upgrade to the City's video wall. Please return one adopted copy of this letter, one original and one copy of the cooperative agreement, and two copies of the resolution to the Department of Public Works, Traffic and Lighting Division. R I 7U �' • '� i c: Chief Executive Office (Rochelle Goff) County Counsel (Warren Wellen) Executive Office THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 14/—�llday of Ser)tember, 2016, by and between the CITY OF DOWNEY, a municipal corporation and charter city in the County of Los Angeles, (hereinafter referred to as CITY), and the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a political subdivision of the State of California, (hereinafter referred to as COUNTY): WITNESSETH •- - • -• - •-• -r • WHEREAS, VIDEO WALL is located and will be utilized entirely within the jurisdictional limits of and �• '' r •- - a • i r VIDEOWHEREAS, CITY will administer procurement and installation of upgrades to ' and WHEREAS, cost ofVIDEO WALLincludes- costs of - procurement __J forthadministration, upgrade to the video wall software and hardware, system installation, co integration, and acceptance testing, and a 5 -year warranty for VIDEO WALL, as more M fully set and LOGM m ITNTs IMe0 9 FrarMNI# .'• F1 IN11 11'o• 11111 # WHEREAS, COUNTY has secured and obtained grant funds from th�_! Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) to finance •rHundredths • ofthe costofVIDE* WALL; . i• WHEREAS, the maximum amount of LACMTA grant funds available to financl the cost of VIDEO WALL is Eighty -Nine# • and 00/100 D •llars ($89,000.00) r• WHEREAS, CITY will provide Twenty -One and Thirty-SeverrAundredths Percent (21.37%) of matching funds for the LACMTA grant up to Twenty -Four Thousand and 00/100 Do lars ($24,000.00); and any cost in excess of One Hundred Thirteen ThousandInd 00/100 t•llars ($113,000.00 WHREAS, VIDEO WALL is consistent with the scqpe of work for traffic improvements: • Memorandum of UnderstandingNumber POOF1312 between COUNTY and LACMTA; and WHEREAS, such a proposal is authorized and provided for by the provisions of Sections 1680-1684 of the California Streets and Highways Code. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by CITY and COUNTY and of the promises herein contained, it is hereby agreed as follows: (1) CITY AGREES: a. To procure services for VIDEO WALL. b. To finance Twenty -One and Thirty -Seven Hundredths Percent (21.37%) of the matching funds for VIDEO WALL up to Twenty -Four Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($24,000.00) and any cost of VIDEO WALL in excess of One Hundred Thirteen Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($113,000.00). c. To administer procurement and installation of VIDEO WALL in accordance with all regulations and requirements of LACMTA relating to the expenditure of Proposition C Local Return funds and Proposition C Twenty -Five Percent (25%) Discretionary funds. CITY'S records for VIDEO WALL shall be open to inspection and subject to audit and reproduction by the COUNTY and LACMTA, or any of their duly authorized representatives, and shall be retained by CITY for a period of not less than seven (7) years after final payment to contractor(s) for VIDEO WALL. d. To furnish COUNTY, within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days after final acceptance of VIDEO WALL, a final accounting of the actual total VIDEO WALL costs, including an itemization of actual unit costs, actual contract quantities, copies of all invoices and cancelled checks; and all other costs required for procurement and installation of VIDEO WALL as specified in paragraph (3) b., below. e. To submit an invoice to COLIN1jY for Seventy -Eight and Sixty -Three Hundredths Percent (78.63%) of thell cost of VIDEO WALL up to a maximum amount of Eighty -Nine Thousand an 00/100 Dollars ($89,000.00) within one hundred twenty (120) calendar da s after the final acceptance of VIDEO WALL, subject to paragraph (3) h., b low. f. Upon completion of VIDEO WALL„ to accept full and complete ownership of, and responsibility for VIDEO WALL, and to maintain in good condition and at CITY'S expense all improvements cnstructed as part of VIDEO WALL within CITY'S jurisdiction. (2) COUNTY AGREES: a. To secure and obtain LACMTAgrant fundsto be used to finance Seventy -Eight and Sixty -Three Hundredths Percent (78.63%) of the cost of l • WALL • to Eighty -Nine Thousand and 00/100 Dollars($89,000.00). `• • deposit following / '.:• ' • :: of VIDEO t : • o demand by •UNTY funds to finance Seventy-Eightand Sixty -Three Hundredths Percent (78.63%) of the actual cost of VIDEO WALL by utilizing LACMTA Grant Funds up to a maximum amount of Eighty -Nine Thousand . • 00/100 D•llars ($89,000.00) an• subject to paragraph below. Said demand will consist of billing invoices prepared by CITY indicating the actual cost of VIDEO WALL, as determined by a final accounting of I D •O a. COUNTY'S contribution shall only pay for those eligible items of work included in LACMTA°s Traffic Signal Synchronization and Bus Speed Improvements Program guidelines. b. The cost of VIDEO WALL, as referred to in this AGREEMENT, shall consist of the costs of the procurement administration, upgrade to the video wall software and hardware, system installation, integration, and acceptance testing, a 5 -year warranty, and all other work and materials necessary to complete the VIDEO WALL in accordance with the approved conceptual plan and shall include currently effective percentages added to total salaries, wages, and equipment costs to cover overhead, administration, and depreciation in connection with any or all of the aforementioned items. consistc. The cost of procurement administration, as referred to in this AGREEMENT, shall of - costs of • - •• • and all other -necessary work prior to awardi �,g of VIDEO WALL -for construction bids and shall include currently effectivel percentages added to total salaries, wages, a equipment • to coveroverhead, administration, • depreciation connectionand ll ofthe aforementioned d. During implementation of VID�O WALL, CITY will furnish an inspector or other representative to perform the functions of an inspector. COUNTY may alsofurnish, at nocost to Consultant or other to assist in the integration of VIDEO ALL. COUNTY will have no obligation to inspect VIDEO WALL. COU TY will not have any liability for claims oi actions brought by third partie based on COUNTY'S alleged inspection or failure to inspect VIDEO Z�11L. CITY will defend, indemnity, and hold harmless COUNTY as to claim and actions by third parties against COUNTY based on i alleged inspection or failure to inspect VIDEO respect to inspections of the VIDEO WALL. The orders of CITY inspector to the contractor or any other person in charge of construction of the VIDEO WALL will prevail and be final. The CITY inspector will be responsible for the proper inspection of VIDEO WALL as needed. e. COUNTY shall not be liable for any costs for VIDEO WALL that does not conform to the regulations and requirements of LACMTA, as referred to in paragraph (1) c., above. f. The financial obligations of COUNTY pursuant to this AGREEMENT are conditional upon COUNTY'S obtaining reimbursement from LACMTA pursuant to Memorandum of Understanding POOF1312 between COUNTY and LACMTA. g. This AGREEMENT may be amended or modified only by mutual written consent of COUNTY and CITY. h. Any correspondence, communication, or contact concerning this AGREEMENT shall be directed to the following: CITY: Mr. Mohammad Mostahkami Director • City of Downey Department of Public Works P.O. Box 7016 COUNTY:Downey, CA 90241-7016 Mrs. Gail Farber Director of •Works Countyof • Angeles Department of Public Works P.O. Box 1460 Alha bra, CA 91802-1460 Neither COUNTY nor ny officer, supervisor, agent, or employee of COUNTY will be responsible fol any damage or liability occurring by reason of any act or omission on )art of •- or r r or • r delegated to, assumed by, or determined to be responsibility of CITY under this AGREEMENT. Pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless COUNTY with respe t to any claim or action brought by a third party for damages • from .; defined by • - or Section 810.8) allegedly arising from any act or omission on the part of CITY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the sponsibility of CITY under this AGREEMENT, Wh are a third party brings a claim or action seeking damages for Injury (as defined by • ••- Section :10.8) under Government••- Section 830, et Page 4 of seq. based on an alleged dangerous condition of property owned by or under ihe control of CITY, CITY will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless COUNTY as to such claim or action. j. Neither CITY nor any officer, supervisor, agent, or employee of CITY will be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by.reason of any act or omission on the part of COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the responsibility of COUNTY under this AGREEMENT. Pursuant to Government Code Section 89 5.4, COUNTY will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY with respect to any claim or action brought by a third party for damages arising from an injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) allegedly arising from any act or omission on the part of COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the responsibility of COUNTY under this AGREEMENT. x. It is understood and agreed that the provisions of this AGREEMENT shall supersede and control over any inconsistent provisions in the Assumption of Liability Agreement No. 32375 between CITY and COUNTY, adopted by the Board of Supervisors on December 27, 1977, and currently in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed by their respective officers, duly authorized, by the CITY OF DOWNEY on Iq .., 2016, and by the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES on_-Ikke"J�o j3___e?016. Executive Officer of the M" - COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES By Chairman, Board of Supervisors that pursuant to Section 2 5101) of the Government Code, delivery cf this document has been made, 7TaM7UrCU9-A7gUles LORI GLASGOW Executive Offic!vr Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Depot D Uty IFI � SUPE ISt�R APPROVED AS To FORM: MARY C. WICKHAM 032 DEC 1 3 2016 County Coun el oft LORI 'hG O By EXECUTIVE OFFICER Deputy CITY OF DOWNEY By Al'Saab UA � MllE Adria M. Jimenez, P:kTLPUffiWPFILE51FILES%TRA%CO-OP AGREFMENTSITSM)OWNEY VIDEO WALL CO-OP AGMT DOC I Attachment A CITY OF DOWNEY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT Professional Services $ 18,269 j Video Wall $ 44,396 Processing Software and.Hardware $ 13,254 Workstation $ 3,658 Audio System $ 636 Auxiliary equipment $ 8,469 5 -Year Warranty $ 8,102 Sales Tax $ 5;957 - Total $ 102,741 Contigencies $ 10,274 { WHEREAS, the CITY OF DOWNEY, hereinafter referred to as CITY, and the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY, desire to upgrade the CITY'S video wall, which work is hereinafter referred to as VIDEO WALL; and WHEREAS, VIDEO WALL is consistent with the scope of work for traffic improvements within CITY pursuant to Memorandum of •i- • • • Number POOF1312 between COUNTY and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority , . ,d WHEREAS, VIDEO WALL is located and will be utilized entirely within the jurisdictional limits of CITY; and administerWHEREAS, CITY will procurement an• installation of •• r- to It • and _ total costof VIDEO WALL is currently estimated to be One Hundred Thirteen Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($113,000.00); and WHEREAS, the total VIDEO WALL costbe financed up toEighty-Nine Thousand • 00/100 Dollars :'111 /!) in LACMTA 2007 Call forProjects, Proposition C Discretionary Grant funds for the Gateway Cities Traffic Signal Forum, . • Twenty -Four Thousand and 00/100 Dollars($24,000.00) •funds; • WHEREAS,• Is finance the cost• WALL in excess of maximum• • • of •' _ Thiousand and 00/100 Dollars WHEREAS,• --• to use all financial aid it receivesfrom •' with respect to the activities described herein; and WHEREAS, such a proposal is authorized and rovided for by the provisions of Sections 1680-1684 of the California Streets and Highways Code. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved as follo s: SECTION 1. The VIDEO WALL is of general CO NTY interest and COUNTY aid shall be extended therefor. ----------------- SECTION 3. The financial obligations of the COUNTY are expressly conditioned upon obtaining reimbursement from LACMTA • to • • POOF1312 • COUNTY and LACMTA. SECTION 4. If any provision of this resolution is held • declared to •- • the resolution shall be void and the consent granted hereunder shall lapse. 10 00 01 10 MUM 11, The foregoing Resolution was adopted on the 0' 'day of DUszj2eD, , 2016, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles and ex officio the governing body of all other special assessment and taxing districts, agencies and authorities for which said Board so acts. MARY C. YY ICKHAM County Counsel By Deputy LORI GLASGOW Executive Officer of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles ir-mmm