HomeMy WebLinkAbout4. PLN-15-00059 - Bicycle Master PlanSTAFF REPORT
PLANNING DIVISION
DATE: JULY 15, 2015
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
SUBMITTED BY: ALDO E. SCHINDLER, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
REVIEWED BY: MARK SELLHEIM, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
PREPARED BY: DAVID BLUMENTHAL, SENIOR PLANNER
SUBJECT: PLN-15-00059 (GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY) – A REQUEST TO
FIND THAT THE PROPOSED BICYCLE MASTER PLAN IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN.
LOCATION: CITYWIDE
ZONING: VARIOUS
REPORT SUMMARY
The City of Downey is currently preparing a Bicycle Master Plan, which will set policies and
direction on how to provide better bicycle amenities within the City. This will include
recommending changes to the Zoning Code to establish regulations on providing bicycle
amenities. Prior to the City Council conducting public hearings on the Master Plan, staff wants
to make sure the proposed plan is consistent with the City’s General Plan. Based on the
analysis contained in this report, staff is recommending the Planning Commission adopt the
following titled resolution:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DOWNEY ADOPTING A FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED BICYCLE MASTER
PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN.
BACKGROUND
The Bicycle Master Plan will set policies and direction on how to provide better bicycle amenities
within the City. The plan analyzes existing conditions, proposes a bicycle network (bike lanes,
share access roads, etc.), recommends signage, and contains an implementation program.
Additionally, the plan includes recommending changes to the Zoning Code to establish regulations
on providing bicycle amenities. On February 18, 2015, a draft of the Bicycle Master Plan was
presented to the Planning Commission during a regular scheduled meeting for informational
purposes only.
The Planning Commission previously considered this request for a General Plan consistency
finding on April 15, 2015. At such time, the Planning Commission requested to review the traffic
General Plan Consistency – PLN-15-00057
July 15, 2015 - Page 2
study prepared for the Bicycle Master Plan. The traffic study is now complete and attached to the
report for the Planning Commission’s information.
DISCUSSION
The Bicycle Master Plan will provide the City direction on how to improve the bicycling experience
in the City. This includes proposals that will provide bicycle lanes to connect a variety of land uses,
provide wayfaring signs, increase safety, and require on-site facilities to accommodate bicycles.
The overall goal is to increase bicycling in the City, which not only has health benefits, but can
reduce traffic.
It is anticipated that the City Council will conduct public hearings to consider the Bicycle Master
Plan in August 2015. Prior to these hearings, staff wants to ensure that the plan is consistent with
the General Plan. Accordingly, staff is requesting the Planning Commission adopt a General Plan
Consistency Finding. In reviewing the General Plan, staff notes that it is a policy of the General
Plan (2.2.2) to “Promote bicycling as an attractive alternative to vehicular transportation.” This
policy is implemented by the following General Plan programs:
2.2.2.1 Encourage the use of bicycling as a form of transportation for employment
commuting and business purposes, in addition to recreational purposes.
2.2.2.2 Establish a bikeway master plan to link employment centers, recreational
facilities, and bikeways along the Rio Hondo River, the San Gabriel River,
Union Pacific Railroad Line, and those of neighboring communities via a
network of bike routes, lanes, and paths.
2.2.2.3 Promote the provision of bicycle racks at retail service and other businesses
for use by customers and employees.
2.2.2.4 Encourage the provision of showers, changing rooms, and bicycle storage
areas at retail, office, industrial, and other businesses for use by employees.
It is staff’s opinion that the Bicycle Master Plan will encourage the use of bicycles to link
employment centers with recreational facilities. Additionally, it will encourage businesses to
provide on-site amenities to accommodate bicycle riders. For these reasons, staff believes the
Planning Commission can find that the Bicycle Master Plan is consistent with the General Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State of California Code of Regulations, staff has found
that this request is not subject to CEQA since finding that adopting a Bicycle Master Plan is
consistent with the General Plan and does not have the potential to create an environmental
impact.
EXHIBITS
A. Draft Resolution
B. Draft Bicycle Master Plan
C. Traffic Study
RESOLUTION NO. _______
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY
ADOPTING A FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED BICYCLE MASTER PLAN IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN.
WHEREAS, the City of Downey General Plan (Vision 2025) was adopted on January 25,
2005; and,
WHEREAS, it is a policy of the General Plan (2.2.2) to “Promote bicycling as an
attractive alternative to vehicular transportation;” and,
WHEREAS, the City of Downey is preparing a Bicycle Master Plan to encourage the use
of bicycling within the City; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that the
proposed Bicycle Master Plan is consistent with the General Plan since it will encourage the use
of bicycling in the City. It provides for bicycle lanes that connect homes, employment centers,
and recreational facilities. Additionally, the Bicycle Master Plan recommends changes to the
Zoning Code to accommodate bicycle racks and other amenities on-site for bicycle riders.
SECTION 2. The Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2015.
Hector Lujan, Chairman
City Planning Commission
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of a Resolution adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Downey at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 15th day of July,
2015, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Mary Cavanagh, Secretary
City Planning Commission
CITY OF DOWNEY
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN
JUNE 2015
FEHR & PEERS
ARELLANO ASSOCIATES
2
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
3
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Executive Summary.................................................................................................6
1. Introduction .........................................................................................................10
Bicycle Master Plan Overview: Goals and Objectives .............................................................10
Public Involvement and Plan Development ................................................................................10
Contents of the Plan ..........................................................................................................................11
2. Existing Policy Framework ............................................................................14
City of Downey Plans and Policies ................................................................................................14
Gateway Cities Plans and Policies ................................................................................................18
Los Angeles County Metro and Other County Plans and Policies .......................................19
Regional Plans and Policies ............................................................................................................20
State Policies .......................................................................................................................................21
Federal Initiatives ...............................................................................................................................23
3. Existing Conditions and Public Input ........................................................24
Existing and Future Land Use and Settlement Patterns .........................................................24
The Bicycling Environment ..............................................................................................................24
Community Input Process ................................................................................................................31
Summary of Key Issues ....................................................................................................................33
4. Proposed Bicycle Facilities ............................................................................37
Proposed Bicycle Network ..............................................................................................................37
Proposed End-of-Trip Bicycle Facilities ........................................................................................40
5. Support Programs .............................................................................................47
Existing Bicycle Safety Education and Outreach Programs ..................................................47
Recommended Support Programs ................................................................................................47
6. Bicycle Master Plan Implementation .........................................................56
Project Prioritization and Implementation Matrix .......................................................................56
Concept Graphics and Cross-Sections ........................................................................................56
Wayfinding Protocol ..........................................................................................................................62
Additional Funding Sources ............................................................................................................64
CONTENTS
4
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
Figure 1-1 Proposed Bicycle Facility Network ..............................................................................13
Figure 2-1 City of Downey Land Use Diagram ............................................................................15
Figure 2-2 Downtown Downey Specific Plan .............................................................................17
Figure 3-1 Future Development Areas ..........................................................................................25
Figure 3-2 Types of Bikeways .........................................................................................................28
Figure 3-3 Existing Bicycle Facilities ..............................................................................................29
Figure 3-4 Downey Bicycle Collisions ...........................................................................................30
Figure 3-5 Dot Exercise – Bike Facility Types .............................................................................32
Figure 3-6 Dot Exercise – Bike Parking Types ............................................................................32
Figure 3-7 Survey Responses – Challenges .............................................................................33
Figure 3-8 Bike-Shed Analysis ........................................................................................................35
Figure 3-9 Bike-Shed Analysis, Excluding 6-Lane Roads ........................................................36
Figure 4-1 Proposed Bicycle Facility Network .............................................................................38
Figure 4-2 Preferred Bicycle Rack Design ...................................................................................41
Figure 4-3 Undesirable Bicycle Rack Design ..............................................................................41
Figure 4-4 Spacing Guidelines – Off-Street .................................................................................42
Figure 4-5 Spacing Guidelines – Aisles ........................................................................................42
Figure 4-6 Spacing Guidelines – Sidewalks ...............................................................................42
Figure 4-7 Proposed End-of-Trip Facilities ...................................................................................45
Figure 6-1 Road Diet Cross-Section (i.e. Old River School Road) ...........................................60
Figure 6-2 Bicycle Route Cross-Section (i.e. Rives Avenue) ....................................................60
Figure 6-3 Bicycle Lane Cross-Section (i.e. Woodruff Avenue) ..............................................60
Figure 6-4 Downtown Downey, Before .........................................................................................61
Figure 6-5 Downtown Downey, After (Photo Simulation) .........................................................61
Figure 6-6 Old River School Road, Before ...................................................................................61
Figure 6-7 Old River School Road, After (Photo Simulation) ...................................................61
Figure 6-8 Concept Plan, 5th Street and Brookshire Avenue ................................................62
Figure 6-9 Concept Plan, 5th Street and Downey Avenue .....................................................62
Figure 6-10 Concept Plan, Old River School Road and Stewart & Gray Road ...................62
Figure 6-11 Recommended Wayfinding Locations .....................................................................63
Figure 6-12 Wayfinding Sign Design Options ..............................................................................64
LIST OF
FIGURES
5
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Table 1-1: Summary of Proposed Facilities ....................................................................................11
Table 1-2: Summary of Proposed Policy/Program Changes .....................................................11
Table 1-3: Contents of the Bicycle Master Plan ............................................................................12
Table 2-1: Summary of Policies and Plans .....................................................................................14
Table 3-1: Existing journey to Work Data .......................................................................................24
Table 3-2: Downey Bicyclists by Trip Group .................................................................................26
Table 3-3: Downey Existing and Future Bicycling Activity ........................................................27
Table 3-4: Bicycle Collision Frequency ..........................................................................................28
Table 3-5: Primary Collision Factors ...............................................................................................31
Table 3-6: Frequency of Collision Type ..........................................................................................31
Table 3-7: Collisions by Time of Day ...............................................................................................31
Table 3-8: Alcohol-Involved Bicycle Collisions .............................................................................31
Table 4-1: Summary of Proposed Phase I Bikeways ...................................................................37
Table 4-2: Summary of Proposed Phase II Projects ...................................................................39
Table 4-3: Summary of Bicycle Parking Types .............................................................................40
Table 4-4: Model California Bicycle Parking Ordinance ............................................................43
Table 4-5: Recommended End-of-Trip Facilities ..........................................................................44
Table 5-1: Recommended Near-Term / Priority Support Programs for Downey ..................48
Table 6-1: Project Prioritization Matrix ............................................................................................57
Table 6-2: Bicycle Master Plan Implementation Matrix .............................................................59
LIST OF TABLES
6
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Goals and Objectives
Background: The City of Downey
The City of Downey is located within the Gateway
Cities region of Los Angeles County, approximately
10 miles southeast of Downtown Los Angeles and
approximately 12 miles northeast of Downtown Long
Beach. According to the 2010 US Census, over 110,000 people live in the
City of Downey. The City has a history of involvement with the aerospace
industry since the middle of the 20th century, and dates back to the
beginning of the 20th century as a center of agriculture and trade. Today,
the City of Downey is a family-oriented community with thousands of
businesses, services, and civic groups.
Vision for the Downey Bicycle Master Plan
Downey has a well-developed regional and local transportation system.
Downey enjoys excellent access to regional transportation assets such
as the I-5, I-710, I-605, and I-105 freeways, the San Gabriel River Bike Path,
the Rio Hondo Bike Path, and the Metro Green Line. Downey offers a local
bus service, the Downey Link, in addition to regional service provided
by Metro. Downtown Downey provides excellent walking access to
stores, restaurants, arts and culture, and educational opportunities. Many
Downey residents ride bicycles both for transportation and for fun.
Some areas in Downey experience congestion and traffic related to
accessing local freeways and goods movement coming from the Port
of Long Beach and the Port of Los Angeles. The local road network
required to support these needs can often mean an unsupportive or
uncomfortable environment for bicycling.
Furthermore, active transportation modes such as bicycling are
increasingly recognized as important components of the transportation
system. Bicycling helps to reduce vehicle emissions and meet
sustainability goals, improve the health and wellness of a community,
and increase local economic development and civic involvement.
Based on the context of transportation and bicycling in Downey, along
with the benefits of encouraging bicycling within the City of Downey, the
Downey Bicycle Master Plan (DBMP) aims to maximize connectivity by
bicycle to the assets already in place in the City. The primary goals of
the Bicycle Master Plan are to provide a safe, efficient, and connected
network of bicycle facilities that residents and stakeholders can enjoy for
a variety of purposes.
Community Input Process
The development of the Bicycle Master Plan comes as part of an
effort by the City of Downey to address local and regional desires to
enhance the viability of bicycling as a mode of transportation and reduce
transportation system impacts on local communities. By making biking
easier and safer, the City can better manage its transportation network
and reduce its overall greenhouse gas emissions resulting from single
occupant driving. The goals, policies, recommendations, and action
items in this Plan are the outcome of a substantial public outreach effort
by the City. The process to develop the Bicycle Master Plan began in
May 2014.
In order to involve the public in the development of the Bicycle
Master Plan, the project team conducted public engagement activities
throughout the summer. These activities are detailed more fully in
Chapter 3, and include:
• Outreach at special events such as the Tour de Downey and
Summer Concert at Furman Park
• Four community workshops held between June 2014 and
December 2014
7
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
• Bicycling needs assessment survey, circulated in English and
Spanish
• Website (www.bikedowney.com) and social media (www.facebook.
com/bikedowney)
Summary of Key Issues
Based on data collection including field visits, survey responses, a public
input dot exercise, a public input mapping exercise, vehicle counts,
bicycle counts, and a collision analysis, several key issues related to
bicycling in Downey. were identified. These key issues helped guide the
development of the proposed bicycle network included in this Plan.
First, there is a latent demand for bicycling in Downey. Figure ES-1 and
ES-2 show the preferred types of bicycle facilities and bicycle parking,
based on dot exercises conducted at the public meetings. The most
popular type of bicycle facility was a cycle track (also known as a
protected bicycle lane) or a buffered or colored bicycle lane. The most
popular type of bicycle parking was an artistic or branded rack, followed
by the post-and-loop style, and bicycle transit center parking.
Figure ES-3 shows the survey responses to the question “In your
opinion, do [the potential challenges and obstacles to biking listed
below] discourage people from biking in Downey?” Eighty-five percent
of survey respondents thought that the lack of bicycle lanes was an
obstacle that discouraged people from biking, and 80% of respondents
thought that speeding was an obstacle that discouraged people from
biking. Developing a comprehensive network of bicycle facilities could
encourage people to consider riding a bicycle for the first time and to
ride more often.
Figure ES-3: Top Responses to “Challenges to Bicycling” Survey Question
0%20%40%60%80%100%
No bike lanes
Speeding
No bike parking
Streets are too wide or busy
Parked cars present a danger to me
0
5
10
15
20
25
Cycle Track Buffered/Colored Bike
Lanes
Bike Path (Class I)Bike Lanes with Road
Diet
Bike Lane (Class II)Bike Route with
Signage Only (Class III)
Bike Boulevard
Figure 3 -5: Preferred Bicycle Facility Type
Female (Adult)Male (Adult)Male (Minor)Female (Minor)
Figure ES-1: Preferred Bicycle Facility Type
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Inverted - U Post and Loop In-street Bicycle Corral Bicycle Lockers Artistic/Branded Bicycle
Rack
Bicycle Transit Center
Parking
Figure 3 -6: Preferred Bicycle Parking Type
Female (Adult)Male (Adult)Male (Minor)Female (Minor)
Figure ES-2: Preferred Bicycle Parking Type
8
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
Second, many arterials have two lanes in each
direction and parking lanes on both sides, but support
lower-than-expected traffic volumes. Several of these
arterials experience speeding concerns, based on
vehicle counts, speed surveys, and survey responses.
Changes to the lane configurations on these arterials
could provide sufficient space for bicycle lanes,
encourage motorists to drive more slowly, and provide
connections throughout the City, while minimally impeding corridor
performance and reducing collisions.
Finally, there is a lack of bicycle connections to some of the most valuable
resources in the City. Many residents enjoy riding on the bike paths along
the east and west sides of the City, but experience a difficult time biking
to them. Similarly, the Metro Green Line Station provides regional access
to jobs and resources, but lacks designated bicycle facilities between
the station and neighborhoods within Downey.
Proposed Network
Based on the existing conditions in Downey and the public input
obtained throughout the Bicycle Master Plan process, new bicycle
facilities are proposed in two phases. Proposed projects are detailed
more fully in Chapter 4. Figure ES-4 illustrates the extent and connectivity
of the proposed facilities.
Phase I
Phase I projects for the proposed bicycle network include Class II and
Class III bikeways. In total, 31 Phase I projects include over 11 miles of Class
II bike lanes along with 22 miles of Class III bike routes. Key corridors
include Class II bicycle lanes on Woodruff Avenue, Old River School
Road, Downey Avenue, Brookshire Avenue, Columbia Way, and Gallatin
Road. The recommended Class III bikeway facilities are appropriate for
narrower residential streets that experience less vehicular traffic. These
bikeways would include signage and wayfinding, on-street sharrows,
and could include additional traffic calming elements. In some cases,
such as on Old River School Road and Brookshire Avenue, Class II bike
lanes will transition to Class III bike routes in advance of intersections
that require higher vehicular capacity, in order to retain two travel lanes
in each direction through the intersection.
Phase II
Phase II projects would build on the momentum from the Phase I
projects, connecting parts of the network that include more space-
constrained intersections and street segments. These projects may
require innovative treatments and adjustments to existing pavement
markings, signal timing, or right-of-way. In total, Phase II projects include
2.5 miles of on-street connections such as bike lanes and two capital-
intensive bicycle/pedestrian bridges.
Proposed End-of-Trip Bicycle Facilities
Bicycle parking is generally categorized into two types: short-term and
long-term Short-term parking consists of bicycle racks located outside of
buildings or in the public rights-of-way (on sidewalks, vehicular parking
spaces, or parks). Short-term bike racks should be convenient and in
close proximity to a bicyclist’s destination. Long-term parking provides
a high level of security for a bicycle and the items attached to a bicycle
(e.g. lights, panniers). Long-term bike parking includes bike lockers, bike
rooms, bike cages, and bike stations.
Chapter 4 provides additional details and location recommendations for
short-term and long-term bicycle parking based on community feedback
and input.
9
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
!(
!!
!!!!
!!
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
Rive
s
A
v
e
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Suv
a
S
t
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
d
Gar
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
5th
S
t
Imp
e
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
T
e
l
e
g
r
a
p
h
R
d
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Be
l
l
f
l
o
w
e
r
B
l
v
d
Foster Rd
D
o
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Par
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
Pat
t
o
n
R
d
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
W
a
y
Ala
m
e
d
a
S
t
Twe
e
d
y
L
n
Firestone
B
l
v
d
Woo
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Din
w
i
d
d
i
e
S
t
4th
S
t
Guate
m
a
l
a
A
v
e
Qui
l
l
D
r
Washburn Rd
Hal
e
d
o
n
A
v
e
Lem
o
r
a
n
A
v
e
Pas
s
o
n
s
B
l
v
d
Ha
n
w
e
l
l
A
v
e
Adoree St
Blod
g
e
t
t
A
v
e
Do
n
o
v
a
n
S
t
Downey
Norwalk
Pico Rivera
Montebello
South
Gate
Bell
Commerce
Bellflower
Lynwood
Santa Fe
Springs
Paramount
Bell Gardens
Huntington Park
Cudahy
LA County Unincorporated
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
§¨¦5
WarrenHigh School
DowneyCivic Center
§¨¦605
§¨¦105
DowneyHigh School
!
!
!
M
Metro Green LineLakewood Blvd
Existing and Proposed Bikeways
Figure 4-1
N
Gateway Cities Bike Project Idea Corridor
n School
Park
Bike Path (Class I)
Bike Lane (Class II)
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Buffered Bike Lane (Class II)
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Planned Bicycle Facilities
!!Under/Overpass
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Gateway Cities Bike Project Idea Location
'Existing Bicycle Path Access Points
Phase II Bicycle Improvements
Bike Route (Class III)
Potential Eco-Rapid Line Station
Gardendale Street
!M
Note: This graphic is conceptual in nature, and is dependent on availability of funding and further study of alignments.
Figure ES-4: Existing and Proposed Bikeways and Facilities
10
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
1. INTRODUCTION
Bicycle Master Plan Overview:
Goals and Objectives
Background: The City of Downey
The City of Downey is located within the Gateway
Cities region of Los Angeles County, approximately 10
miles southeast of Downtown Los Angeles and approximately 12 miles
northeast of Downtown Long Beach. According to the 2010 US Census,
over 110,000 people live in the City of Downey. The City has a history
of involvement with the aerospace industry since the middle of the 20th
century, and dates back to the beginning of the 20th century as a center
of agriculture and trade. Today, the City of Downey is a family-oriented
community with thousands of businesses, services, and civic groups.
Vision for the Downey Bicycle Master Plan
Downey has a well-developed regional and local transportation system.
Downey enjoys excellent access to regional transportation assets such
as the I-5, I-710, I-605, and I-105 freeways, the San Gabriel River Bike Path,
the Rio Hondo Bike Path, and the Metro Green Line. Downey offers a local
bus service, the Downey Link, in addition to regional service provided
by Metro. Downtown Downey provides excellent walking access to
stores, restaurants, arts and culture, and educational opportunities. Many
Downey residents ride bicycles both for transportation and for fun.
Some areas in Downey experience congestion and traffic related to
accessing local freeways and goods movement coming from the Port
of Long Beach and the Port of Los Angeles. The local road network
required to support these needs can often mean an unsupportive or
uncomfortable environment for bicycling.
Furthermore, active transportation modes such as bicycling are
increasingly recognized as important components of the transportation
system. Bicycling helps to reduce vehicle emissions and meet
sustainability goals, improve the health and wellness of a community,
and increase local economic development and civic involvement.
Based on the context of transportation and bicycling in Downey, along
with the benefits of encouraging bicycling within the City of Downey, the
Downey Bicycle Master Plan (DBMP) aims to maximize connectivity by
bicycle to the assets already in place in the City. The primary goals of
the Bicycle Master Plan are to provide a safe, efficient, and connected
network of bicycle facilities that residents and stakeholders can enjoy for
a variety of purposes.
Public Involvement and Plan Development
The development of the Bicycle Master Plan comes as part of an
effort by the City of Downey to address local and regional desires to
enhance the viability of bicycling as a mode of transportation and reduce
transportation system impacts on local communities. By making biking
easier and safer, the City can better manage its transportation network
and reduce its overall greenhouse gas emissions resulting from single
occupant driving. The City of Downey General Plan, adopted in 2005,
identifies active modes of transportation such as bicycling as a way to
mitigate congestion and advance livable communities. The General Plan
Circulation Element directly recommends the creation of a Bicycle Master
Plan to identify bicycle routes throughout the City (Program 2.2.2.2.). The
process to develop the Bicycle Master Plan began in May 2014.
11
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
In order to involve the public in the development of the Bicycle
Master Plan, the project team conducted public engagement activities
throughout the summer. These activities are detailed more fully in
Chapter 3, and include:
• Outreach at special events such as the Tour de Downey and
Summer Concert at Furman Park
• Four community workshops
• Bicycling needs assessment survey
• Website and social media
Additionally, project staff engaged in several data collection efforts to
support the development of the plan. These data included measurements
of street and lane widths, alignments, traffic counts, motorist and bicyclist
behavior observations, and video footage of each proposed bike route
using a GoPro camera.
Proposed Bicycle
Network
Based on the goals and context
of the Bicycle Master Plan,
along with the public input
process, a proposed bicycle
network of on-street and end-
of-trip facilities was developed
by the project team for review
by the City and by the public.
This proposed network is
discussed in Chapter 4. Table
1-1 summarizes the proposed facilities by type and mileage. Figure 1-1
illustrates the Proposed Bicycle Network.
Table 1-1: Summary of Proposed Facilities
Type of Facility
Number of
Segments
or Facilities
Total
Mileage
Class II bikeway 9 11.6
Class III bikeway 2222.0
Bike racks 87 --
Bicycle corrals 8 --
Bike lockers 1 --
Changing facilities 1 --
Clothing/equipment
storage facilities
1 --
Proposed Policy and Program Changes
To support the infrastructure changes suggested in the Proposed Bicycle
Network, the Bicycle Master Plan also recommends policy changes
and programming to maximize the effectiveness, safety and utilization
of new bicycle facilities. Table 1-2 summarizes the policy changes and
programming recommendations.
Table 1-2: Summary of Proposed Policy/Program Changes
Proposed Policy/
Program Changes Lead Department Funding
Source
Estimated
Cost
Adjustments to bike-related
clauses in Municipal Code Planning Division, City CouncilLocal Low
Bicycle-parking policy to be
added to Municipal Code Planning Division, City CouncilLocal Low
Staff / Agency TrainingAll Relevant City Departments Office of Traffic
Safety Grant Medium
Bicycle and Pedestrian
Advisory Committee Planning Division, Public WorksLocal Low
Bicycle Training for OfficersDowney Police Department Office of Traffic
Safety Grant Medium
Data Collection and
Monitoring
LACBC, Universities, All
Relevant City Departments
Office of Traffic
Safety Grant Low
Funding and Implementation
In addition to developing a proposed bicycle network of on-street and
end-of-trip facilities, the Bicycle Master Plan includes information on
typical cross-sections, cost estimates, funding, and implementation in the
form of a Bikeways Implementation Guide, contained in Chapter 6.
Contents of the Plan
Table 1-3 outlines the contents of the Bicycle Master Plan by chapter.
12
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
Table 1-3: Contents of the Bicycle Master Plan
Chapter Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction --
Chapter 2: Existing Policy Framework Summarizes the key plans, programs, policies and other planning documents that will be affected by and may affect the recommendations and implementation
of the Bicycle Master Plan.
Chapter 3: Existing Conditions and Public Input Discusses the existing local conditions relevant to bicycling and walking, including land use patterns and commuting statistics. This section also includes a
discussion of the public input process throughout the development of the Bicycle Master Plan.
Chapter 4: Proposed Bicycle Network Presents the network of proposed on-street and end-of-trip bicycle facilities based on expressed needs, future development conditions, key destinations,
and activity centers.
Chapter 5: Support Programs Describes the bicycle and pedestrian safety and education programs in Downey, and recommends additional programs and enhancements to improve the
state of bicycling and walking in the City.
Chapter 6: Bikeway Implementation Guide Includes a phased implementation for the bicycle network, description of funding opportunities, planning-level cost estimates, typical cross-sections,
photosimulations of proposed designs, and potential challenges to implementation.
Appendix A Public input process and survey results
Appendix B Project Sheets for select representative projects
Appendix C Wayfinding Protocol
Appendix D Bicycle and vehicle counts
13
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
!(
!!
!!!!
!!
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
Rive
s
A
v
e
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Suv
a
S
t
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
d
Gar
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
5th
S
t
Imp
e
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
T
e
l
e
g
r
a
p
h
R
d
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Be
l
l
f
l
o
w
e
r
B
l
v
d
Foster Rd
D
o
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Par
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
Pat
t
o
n
R
d
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
W
a
y
Ala
m
e
d
a
S
t
Twe
e
d
y
L
n
Firestone
B
l
v
d
Woo
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Din
w
i
d
d
i
e
S
t
4th
S
t
Guate
m
a
l
a
A
v
e
Qui
l
l
D
r
Washburn Rd
Hal
e
d
o
n
A
v
e
Lem
o
r
a
n
A
v
e
Pas
s
o
n
s
B
l
v
d
Ha
n
w
e
l
l
A
v
e
Adoree St
Blod
g
e
t
t
A
v
e
Do
n
o
v
a
n
S
t
Downey
Norwalk
Pico Rivera
Montebello
South
Gate
Bell
Commerce
Bellflower
Lynwood
Santa Fe
Springs
Paramount
Bell Gardens
Huntington Park
Cudahy
LA County Unincorporated
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
§¨¦5
WarrenHigh School
DowneyCivic Center
§¨¦605
§¨¦105
DowneyHigh School
!
!
!
M
Metro Green LineLakewood Blvd
Existing and Proposed Bikeways
Figure 4-1
N
Gateway Cities Bike Project Idea Corridor
n School
Park
Bike Path (Class I)
Bike Lane (Class II)
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Buffered Bike Lane (Class II)
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Planned Bicycle Facilities
!!Under/Overpass
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Gateway Cities Bike Project Idea Location
'Existing Bicycle Path Access Points
Phase II Bicycle Improvements
Bike Route (Class III)
Potential Eco-Rapid Line Station
Gardendale Street
!M
Note: This graphic is conceptual in nature, and is dependent on availability of funding and further study of alignments.
Figure 1-1: Existing and Proposed Bikeways and Facilities
14
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
2. EXISTING POLICY
FRAMEWORK
This chapter summarizes the existing plans and policy
documents relevant to bicycling in the City of Downey.
These documents have been grouped into City of
Downey Plans and Policies, Gateway Cities Plans
and Policies, Los Angeles County Plans and Policies,
Regional Plans and Policies, State Policies, and Federal Initiatives. Table
2-1 summarizes the existing plans and policy documents included in this
chapter.
City of Downey Plans and Policies
Downey General Plan
The Land Use Element of the Downey General Plan outlines the use
of space within the City. The Land Use Diagram displays the land use
categories established in the General Plan, including low- to medium-
density residential, commercial, manufacturing, open space, schools,
public, and mixed-use. The City of Downey’s land use and settlement
patterns are shown in Figure 2-1. The City enjoys a relatively thorough
integration of commercial and retail opportunities within easy access to
most residential neighborhoods. This provides a good framework for a
bicycle network that can provide access to key destinations within the
City.
In addition to the land use designations, other goals in the Land Use
Element relevant to the Bicycle Master Plan include promoting the
establishment of TODs near the Green Line Station at Lakewood
Boulevard and at the I-105 Freeway, promoting Downtown Downey as
a destination for entertainment and dining uses, promoting mixed-use
and “smart growth” areas in Downtown Downey and Downey Landing,
and promoting project designs that reduce dependency on vehicles and
promote pedestrian, transit and alternative modes of travel.
Table 2-1: Summary of Policies and Plans
City of
Downey
Plans and
Policies
Gateway Cities
Plans and
Policies
Los Angeles
County Plans
and Policies
Regional Plans
and Policies
State
Policies
Federal
Initiatives
Downey
General
Plan
Gateway
Cities Active
Transportation
Plan
LA County
Metro Bicycle
Transportation
Strategic Plan
Rail to River
Active
Transportation
Corridor
Feasibility
Study
AB 32 / SB
375
US DOT
Policy
Statement
on Bicycles
Downtown
Downey
Specific
Plan
Gateway Cities
Sustainable
Communities
Strategy
LA County
Bicycle Master
Plan
LA River
Ecosystem
Restoration
Integrated
Feasibility
Report
California
Vehicle
Code
Downey
Municipal
Code
City of South
Gate Bicycle
Transportation
Plan
LA County Metro
Countywide
Sustainability
Planning
Policy and
Implementation
Plan /
Sustainable
Communities
Strategy
Southern
California
Association of
Governments
Regional
Transportation
Plan /
Sustainable
Communities
Strategy
Caltrans’
Complete
Streets
Policy
Downey
Parks and
Recreation
Master Plan
Lynwood
Bicycle and
Pedestrian
Transportation
Plan
LA County Metro
First/Last Mile
Strategic Plan
California
Complete
Streets Act
Paramount
Bicycle Plan - In
progress
LA County Metro
Congestion
Management
Program
AB 1581
and
Caltrans’
Policy
Directive
09-06Bellflower
Bicycle Plan - In
progress
LA County TOD
Access Study
15
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Figure 2-1: City of Downey Land Use Map (Source: City of Downey, Planning Division)
16
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
The Circulation Element of the Downey General Plan
classifies streets in categories including Major Arterial,
Primary Arterial, Secondary Arterial, Collector, and
Local. It also outlines strategies for addressing traffic
congestion that may be relevant to the Bicycle Master
Plan including:
• The removal of on-street parking to increase capacity and improve
safety
• Reducing the number of driveways on street
• Discouraging the use of local streets as through streets by
selecting projects or designing sites, street patterns and street
signalization that encourage vehicular traffic to use major arterials
• Promoting the use of alternative modes of travel
• Promoting bicycling as an attractive alternative to vehicular
transportation (City of Downey, 2005)
Other General Plan Elements that mention goals related to the Bicycle
Master Plan include the Conservation Element, the Safety Element,
the Open Space Element, the Design Element, and the Economic
Development Element. These goals are peripherally related to bicycling
in Downey via themes such as air quality goals or design guidelines.
The goals and programs identified throughout the Downey General Plan
have helped to shape the goals and direction of the Bicycle Master Plan.
Downtown Downey Specific Plan
The Downtown Downey Specific Plan addresses land use and
development in Downtown Downey, where much of the future growth
is predicted to occur. Figure 2-2 shows the land use plan for Downtown
Downey. It also includes a Mobility Plan that discusses bicycle use in
detail. The Plan recommends a bicycle backbone network to provide
access to Downtown from other parts of Downey. The Mobility Plan
recommends primarily Class III bike routes on Collector/Local streets,
with more visible Class II bike lane treatments on Downey Avenue and
Brookshire Avenue. The facilities proposed in the Bicycle Master Plan
are consistent with those proposed in the Downtown Downey Specific
Plan.
The Mobility Plan also recommends “Class I” bicycle parking facilities,
defined as bicycle storage racks, bicycle lockers, bicycle “barns”
(staffed or unstaffed), to be located near the Downey Depot and the
Civic Center. Other recommended end-of-trip facilities include lockers,
racks, locker rooms and showers, to be provided typically by employers.
Finally, the Mobility Plan recommends rest amenities like drinking
fountains, benches, picnic tables and lawn areas, some of which are
already provided through the downtown area. The Bicycle Master Plan
expands on the recommendations in the Downtown Downey Specific
Plan to encourage a bicycle parking policy for new development, design
guidelines, and siting guidelines for bicycle parking.
Downey Municipal Code
Until recently, the Downey Municipal Code required residents who ride
bicycles on a city street or sidewalk to obtain a license for the bicycle.
The sections specifying the requirement to obtain a license were
originally adopted in 1958, and updated in 1984. On June 10, 2014, an
ordinance was passed to repeal Article III, Chapter 2 of the Downey
Municipal Code, which eliminated the bicycle license requirement.
The Municipal Code defines “pedestrian safety” and “pedestrian-
oriented/-friendly” design (Section 9152) and refers to these elements
in the section on Mixed-Use Zones (Section 9316), but does not include
similar language for “bicycle safety” or “bicycle-friendly” design.
17
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
M
Figure 2-2
Land Use Districts
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
La
n
d
U
s
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
Downtown Downey Specific Plan
29
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
2
.
1
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
D
o
w
n
e
y
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
La
n
d
U
s
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
2.2 Downtown Districts This chapter introduces the five land use districts established to guide unique development approaches within specific areas of Downtown. The five districts are: Downtown Core, Downtown Residential, Firestone Boulevard Gateway, Paramount Boulevard Professional, and Civic Center. Development standards
and design guidelines are provided for each district in Chapter 3.
Exhibit 2.1: Downtown Downey Land Use Districts
Figure 2-2: Downtown Downey Land Use Plan
18
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
Section 9530 on transportation demand management
requires certain actions to be taken by nonresidential
developments between 25,000 and 100,000 square
feet, including bicycle route information and on-site
bicycle facilities posted on a bulletin board, bicycle
racks or secure bicycle parking. For developments
over 100,000 square feet, the above facilities are
required as well as “safe and convenient access
from the external circulation system to on-site bicycle parking facilities”
(Section 9530.06).
Bicycles are listed in some other parts of the Municipal Code, alongside
pedestrians and vehicles, as it relates to landscaping (Section 9520) and
signs (Section 9602, 9614).
As part of the findings that are made for Site Plan Reviews, consideration
must be given to the functional aspects of the site, including automobile
and pedestrian circulation (Section 9820.08). Bicycles should be added
to this section to be consistent with the other cases where pedestrians,
vehicles, and bicyclists are mentioned all together.
Downey Parks and Recreation Master Plan
(forthcoming)
The survey summary from the forthcoming Parks and Recreation Master
Plan shows that Furman Park and Apollo Park are the most-utilized
spaces in the City. The survey also shows that a majority of respondents
would be willing to raise property taxes $20 per year or more for
improvements to existing parks, development of trails, or additional
recreation programs. Recently, the City announced plans to install two
walking trails at local parks. This shows strong public support for park
improvements and active recreation improvements, which could include
bicycle facilities. The Bicycle Master Plan considers these important
community resources in the development of the proposed on-street
bicycle facilities and bicycle parking facilities.
Gateway Cities Plans and Policies
Gateway Cities Active Transportation Plan
The Gateway Cities Council of Governments is developing an Active
Transportation Plan (ATP). This Plan proposes an active transportation
network connecting the cities that are part of the Gateway Cities Council
of Governments, including the City of Downey. For example, the bike
facility proposed on Columbia Way in Downey would connect to the
proposed regional bike lane on Clark Avenue in the Gateway Cities ATP
to provide access to cities south of Downey, and the proposed road diet
and bicycle lane on Gardendale is listed in the Gateway Cities ATP as
well as the Downey Bicycle Master Plan. The Gateway Cities ATP also
includes a discussion of support programs, pedestrian facilities, transit
station area improvements (at selected stations), and funding for the
proposed improvements.
Gateway Cities Sustainable Communities
Strategy
The Gateway Cities Council of Governments has chosen to develop a
Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) rather than rely on a regional
SCS developed by SCAG. Only one other of the 14 SCAG subregions has
decided to do this. SCAG’s SCS (discussed below) is superseded by the
GCCOG SCS. The GCCOG SCS is composed of five bundles of GHG
reduction strategies, including:
• Transportation Strategies
• Transportation Demand Management Strategies
• Land Use Strategies
• Regional Transportation Projects, including Measure R-funded
projects
• Interactive Effects Between Land Use and Regional Transit Projects
19
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Some strategies have already been employed over the last decade;
all will be implemented in the future to reduce subregional emissions
from a 2005 benchmark to target levels by 2020 and 2035. GCCOG
SCS strategies have been integrated with regional transportation
projects included in the 2012 SCAG RTP for the GCCOG area. The
tailored, local nature of the Gateway Cities’ SCS is projected to result
in GHG reductions of 8.4 percent per capita by 2020 and 15 percent
per capita by 2035, exceeding regional targets set by the California Air
Resources Board. The Downey Bicycle Master Plan aligns with the goals
of the Gateway Cities SCS by promoting zero-emissions transportation
strategies, connecting to regional transportation projects included in the
Gateway Cities ATP, and proposing policy changes that strengthen the
City of Downey’s approach to transportation demand management.
Bicycle Plans from Adjacent Cities
Several cities near Downey have advanced active transportation
planning by adopting plans that focus on the development of bicycle and
pedestrian infrastructure, support facilities, public involvement, programs
and practices, and potential funding sources. These cities include:
• City of South Gate Bicycle Transportation Plan
• Lynwood Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan
• Paramount – in progress
• Bellflower – in progress
Los Angeles County Metro and Other
County Plans and Policies
LA County Metro Bicycle Transportation
Strategic Plan
In 2006, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
(Metro) released two documents relating to bicycle planning in the
region: the Metro Bicycle Transportation Strategic Plan (BTSP) and
Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) Compliance Document. Both of
these documents supplant prior countywide bicycle planning documents
dating back to 1996. The Strategic Plan is intended to be used by local
cities and Los Angeles County Transit agencies in setting bicycle-related
priorities that lead to regional improvements. The document discusses
the significance of bicycle usage with transit as a way of expanding
mobility options within the region. The BTA document inventories and
maps existing and planned facilities, and provides information regarding
past expenditures by the 89 local jurisdictions within the county. The plan
also includes: a listing of 167 “bike-transit hubs” in the county, procedures
for evaluating access to transit, best-practices in a tool box of design
measures, gaps in the regional bikeway network, and 12 prototypical
“bike-transit hub” access plans in different areas of the county, including
a sample bicycle access plan for Metrolink Stations. The Downey Bicycle
Master Plan supports the goals of the BTSP and BTA by recommending
access improvements to the Lakewood Green Line Station and by
improving bicycle access within LA County generally and the Gateway
Cities region specifically.
LA County Bicycle Master Plan
The Los Angeles County Bicycle Master Plan was adopted by the Los
Angeles County Board of Supervisors. The Plan was developed by the
Los Angeles County Public Works Department and an appointed Bicycle
Task Force. The Countywide Bicycle Plan identifies opportunities for
off-street bicycle facilities, on-street bicycle facilities, and shared-use
pathways in unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County, including
those within and adjacent to the City of Downey, including the Rio Hondo
and San Gabriel River trails.
20
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
LA County Metro Countywide
Sustainability Planning Policy and
Implementation Plan / Sustainable
Communities Strategies
In 2012, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (Metro) released their
Countywide Sustainability Planning Policy &
Implementation Plan as a complement to their
previous efforts to improve air quality and increase the range of
transportation choices available to residents in Los Angeles county. The
Policy aims to better integrate land-use and transportation planning in
order to provide more mobility options and better access, as well as
promote “green modes” of transportation including active transportation
modes such as walking and bicycling. Metro’s Policy is superseded by
the GCCOG’s sub-regional SCS, discussed above, but is relevant in
understanding countywide goals in order to align the proposed bicycle
network in Downey with the rest of Los Angeles County.
LA County Metro First/Last Mile Strategic Plan
Metro released a draft of their First/Last Mile Strategic Plan in late 2013.
The goal of this document is to provide guidelines to improve access to
transit across the county, and in doing so, maximize multi-modal benefits.
The guidance in this document aligns with the GCCOG SCS, the SCAG
RTP/SCS and the Metro Countywide Sustainability Planning Policy,
described above. The First/Last Mile Strategic Plan cites the existing
conditions, both in terms of design and safety statistics, and introduces
the concept of The Path, a proposed countywide transit access network,
comprised of a series of active transportation improvements that
extend to and from Metro Rail and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) stations. The
document also includes a step-by-step process for identifying a Path
network for any given station area and a toolbox of improvements that
would help establish a Path network around the station. The Downey
Bicycle Master Plan supports the goals of the First Last Mile Strategic
Plan by recommending access improvements to the Lakewood Green
Line Station and future Eco-Rapid/West Santa Ana Branch Corridor
stations.
LA County Metro Congestion Management
Program
Metro adopted the 2010 Congestion Management Program as the eighth
update to a history of congestion management programs dating back to
1992. The 2010 CMP is a multimodal program, including strategies related
to the freeways and streets, the transit network, transportation demand
management, and land use. Jurisdictions are required to conform to the
CMP in order to receive funding from the state gas tax, as allocated by
Section 2105 of the California Streets and Highways Code. As part of the
process of developing recommendations for the Downey Bicycle Master
Plan, the project team has gone through intersection-level analysis of the
proposed treatments to ensure ongoing conformance to the CMP.
Regional Plans and Policies
Southern California Association of
Governments Regional Transportation Plan/
Sustainable Communities Strategy
In 2012, SCAG adopted the 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/
Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), which integrates the
region’s transportation and land use planning. The non-motorized
transportation section provides information regarding existing mode
split, bicyclist types, bicycle safety, the California Strategic Highway
Safety Plan for bicyclists, and identifies implementation priorities for local
jurisdictions. Of the $524.7 billion transportation expenditures in the
RTP, $6.9 billion are allocated for non-motorized projects. Like the LA
County Metro SCS discussed above, the SCAG SCS is superseded by
the GCCOG sub-regional SCS but is relevant in understanding regional
goals in order to align the proposed bicycle network in Downey with the
rest of the Southern California region.
21
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
LA River Ecosystem Restoration Integrated
Feasibility Report
The United States Army Corps of Engineers, in partnership with the
City of Los Angeles, completed the Los Angeles River Ecosystem
Restoration Integrated Feasibility Report in September 2013. The main
objective of the Tentatively Selected Plan (TSP) and plan alternatives
is restore approximately 11 miles of the Los Angeles River with a more
natural habitat, reconnect existing tributaries and habitats, reestablishing
the historic flood plain, and preserving existing levels of flood risk
management. The document focuses on four action alternatives
that have undergone detailed analysis and represent the options
available for selection. The options vary in terms of investment and
final implementation components. With portions of the LA River in the
area having a designated bicycle path north and south of downtown
Los Angeles, the selected alternative will help close the facility gap and
improve bicycle accessibility and connectivity throughout the region. The
Downey Bicycle Master Plan addresses connectivity to two other major
north-south regional bike paths, the Rio Hondo and the San Gabriel River
trails. Additionally, proposed east-west facilities in the Downey Bicycle
Master Plan would help connect Downey residents to the LA River path,
improving overall regional connectivity.
State Policies
AB 32 (2006)/SB 375 (2008)
Senate Bill (SB) 375 (2008) is the implementation legislation for Assembly
Bill (AB) 32. AB 32 (2006) requires the reduction of greenhouse gases
(GHG) by 28 percent by the year 2020 and by 50 percent by the year
2050. GHGs are emissions – carbon dioxide chief among them – that
accumulate in the atmosphere and trap solar energy in a way that can
affect global climate patterns. The largest source of these emissions
related to human activity is generated by combustion-powered
machinery, internal combustion vehicle engines, and equipment used
to generate power and heat. SB 375 tasks metropolitan and regional
planning agencies with achieving GHG reductions through their
Regional or Metropolitan Transportation Plans. The reduction of the
use the automobile for trip making is one method for reducing GHG
emissions. This can be achieved through the use of modes other than
the automobile, such as walking, bicycling, or using transit. The Downey
Bicycle Master Plan supports the goals of AB32/SB375 by promoting
bicycling throughout the City, a zero-emissions mode of transportation.
California Vehicle Code
The California Vehicle Code establishes rules and regulations for
operating a bicycle on the street in the state of California, which
the Downey Police Department is responsible for enforcing. Close
adherence and strict enforcement of the Vehicle Code for both motorists
and bicyclists would have safety benefits for everyone in Downey. The
following is a non-exhaustive list of the most important regulations
related to bicycle operation, by Vehicle Code Section:
• 21200 – A person riding a bicycle has all the rights and is subject
to all the provisions applicable to the driver of a vehicle.
• 21200.5 – It is unlawful to ride a bicycle under the influence of
alcohol or drugs.
• 21201 – Establishes equipment requirements for bicycles, including
lights, brakes, and handlebar configurations.
• 21202 – A person riding a bicycle at a speed less than the normal
speed of traffic shall ride as close as practicable to the right-hand
curb or edge of the roadway except when overtaking another
bicycle or vehicle, when preparing for a left turn, when necessary
to avoid unsafe conditions, or when approaching a right-turn lane.
• 21206 – Local jurisdictions may adopt bicycle regulations provided
they do not conflict with the CVC.
22
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
• 21209 – No person shall drive a motor vehicle
in the bicycle lane except to park in a curb lane where
parking is permitted, to enter or leave the roadway,
or to prepare for a turn within 200 feet from the
intersection.
• 21210 – Bicycle parking must not conflict with
the path for pedestrian traffic.
• 21212 – Bicycle riders under the age of 18 must wear a helmet.
• 21456.2 – Bicycle riders must follow official traffic control signals,
except where bicycle traffic signals direct bicycles otherwise, in
conjunction with Section 21456.3.
• 21650.1 – Bicycles operated on the streets or shoulder shall be
operated in the same direction as vehicles.
• 21760 – “Three Feet for Safety Act” requires drivers of a motor
vehicle to pass a bicycle with at least three feet of space (effective
September 16, 2014.)
• 21960 – Caltrans and local authorities may prohibit the use of
bicycles on controlled-access roadways such as freeways or
expressways.
• 39001 – California Department of Motor Vehicles designs and
distributes the licenses and registration forms to any city that
adopts a bicycle license ordinance.
Caltrans’ Complete Streets Policy
In 2001, Caltrans adopted a routine accommodation policy for the state in
the form of Deputy Directive 64, “Accommodating Nonmotorized Travel.”
The directive was updated in 2008 as “Complete Streets—Integrating
the Transportation System.” The new policy reads, in part:
“The Department views all transportation improvements as opportunities
to improve safety, access, and mobility for all travelers in California and
recognizes bicycle, pedestrian, and transit modes as integral elements
of the transportation system.
The Department develops integrated multimodal projects in balance
with community goals, plans, and values. Addressing the safety and
mobility needs of bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit users in all projects,
regardless of funding, is implicit in these objectives. Bicycle, pedestrian
and transit travel is facilitated by creating “complete streets” beginning
early in system planning and continuing through project delivery and
maintenance and operations….”
The directive establishes Caltrans’ own responsibilities under this policy.
Among the responsibilities that Caltrans assigns to various staff positions
under the policy are:
• Ensure bicycle, pedestrian, and transit interests are appropriately
represented on interdisciplinary planning and project delivery
development teams.
• Ensure bicycle, pedestrian, and transit user needs are addressed
and deficiencies identified during system and corridor planning,
project initiation, scoping, and programming.
• Ensure incorporation of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit travel
elements in all Department transportation plans and studies.
• Promote land uses that encourage bicycle, pedestrian, and transit
travel.
• Research, develop, and implement multimodal performance
measures.
23
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
California Complete Streets Act (2008)
Assembly Bill 1358, the “California Complete Streets Act of 2008,” requires
“that the legislative body of a city or county, upon any substantive revision
of the circulation element of the general plan, modify the circulation
element to plan for a balanced, multimodal transportation network that
meets the needs of all users [including] motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists,
children, persons with disabilities, seniors, movers of commercial goods,
and users of public transportation….” This provision of the law went into
effect on January 1, 2011. The law also directs the Governor’s Office of
Planning and Research to amend its guidelines for the development of
circulation elements so as to assist cities and counties in meeting the
requirement.
AB 1581 (2007) and Caltrans’ Policy Directive 09-
06 (2009)
Assembly Bill (AB) 1581 (2007) provides direction that new actuated traffic
signal construction and modifications to existing traffic signals include
the ability to detect bicycles and motorcycles. It also calls for the timing
of actuated traffic signals to account for bicycles. In response to AB 1581,
Caltrans has issues Traffic Operations Policy Directive 09-06 (2009),
which has proposed modifications to Table 4D-105(D) of the California
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The California Traffic Control
Devices Committee is considering the proposed modifications.
Federal Initiatives
US DOT Policy Statement on Bicycles
In addition to local, regional, and state planning initiatives, the United
States Department of Transportation issued a Policy Statement on Bicycle
and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations
in 2010. This policy directive demonstrates the DOT’s support of fully
integrated active transportation networks by incorporating walking
and bicycling facilities into transportation projects. The statement
encourages transportation agencies to go beyond minimum standards
in the provision of the facilities. The DOT further encourages agencies to
adopt policy statements that would affect bicycling and walking, such as:
• Considering walking and bicycling as equals with other
transportation modes
• Ensuring availability of transportation choices for people of all
ages and abilities
• Going beyond minimum design standards
• Integrating bicycle and pedestrian accommodations on new,
rehabilitated, and limited access bridges
• Collecting data on walking and biking trips
• Setting mode share for walking and bicycling and tracking them
over time
• Removing snow from sidewalks and shared use paths
• Improving non-motorized facilities during maintenance projects
24
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
3. EXISTING
CONDITIONS AND
PUBLIC INPUT
Existing and Future Land Use and
Settlement Patterns
The City of Downey is a member of the Gateway
Cities Council of Governments (GCCOG), which is developing an Active
Transportation Plan for the region. This Bicycle Master Plan is the first
comprehensive bicycle planning effort conducted by the City.
The City of Downey experiences mild temperatures and low levels of
rainfall. The City is relatively flat, and crossed by a grid of streets that
support easy access to freeways, regional economic opportunities,
local economic and recreational opportunities, and regional goods
movement. Patterns of commercial and residential development have
resulted in a well-integrated city which offers short trip-lengths to
everyday destinations.
These conditions offer both opportunities and challenges to active
modes of transportation such as bicycling. The climate and topography
are ideal for cycling, and the integrated development patterns throughout
the City minimize trip lengths, ideal for bicycling. However, the City is
situated along important regional corridors, resulting in a high proportion
of truck traffic and through traffic that could discourage bicycling.
Future land use and development patterns have been identified in the
General Plan and the Downtown Downey Specific Plan, discussed in the
previous chapter. Figure 3-1 shows the areas identified for future mixed-
use development, which are ideal locations to encourage bicycling for
transportation. These considerations have shaped the development of
the proposed bicycle network presented in Chapter 4.
The Bicycling Environment
Existing and Future Bicycling Activity in Downey
Knowing how many people bicycle, and for what purposes, can help
Downey develop effective projects and programs to better serve
residents and resident-employees. A common term used in describing
demand for bicycle facilities is “mode split.” Mode split refers to the
form of transportation a person chooses to take, such as walking,
bicycling, public transit or driving. It is often used in evaluating commuter
alternatives such as bicycling, where the objective is to increase the
percentage of people selecting a means of transportation other than
the single-occupant (or drive-alone) automobile. Table 3-1 presents
the American Community Survey data (2013, 5-year estimates) for the
journey-to-work mode split for the City of Downey, compared to the
United States, California, and Los Angeles County.
As shown, driving is the predominant means of commuting in Downey,
higher than the rates for Los Angeles County, California, and the United
States as a whole. Bicycle trips represent less than one percent of home-
based work trips in Downey. This should not be misinterpreted as the
bicycle mode share of all trips for several reasons:
• Journey-to-work data only represents commute trips, which tend
to be longer than shopping, school, recreation, and other trips,
and are therefore less compatible with bicycling.
Table 3-1: Existing journey to Work Data
ModeUnited StatesCalifornia Los Angeles
County Downey
Drive Alone 76.1%73.0%72.2%81.2%
Carpool 10.0%11.5%10.9%11.0%
Transit 5.0%5.1%7.1%2.9%
Bike 0.6%1.0%0.8%0.2%
Walk 2.8%2.8%2.9%1.8%
Other 5.5%6.5%6.1%2.9%
Source: American Communities Survey, 2013 (5-year estimates),
25
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Downey
Norwalk
Pico Rivera
South
Gate
Bell
Commerce
Bellflower
Lynwood
Santa Fe
Springs
Paramount
Bell Gardens
Cudahy
Riv
e
s
A
v
e
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Suv
a
S
t
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
d
Gar
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
5th
S
t
Imp
e
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
T
e
l
e
g
r
a
p
h
R
d
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Be
l
l
f
l
o
w
e
r
B
l
v
d
Foster Rd
D
o
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Par
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
Pat
t
o
n
R
d
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
W
a
y
Ala
m
e
d
a
S
t
Tw
e
e
d
y
L
n
Firestone
B
l
v
d
Woo
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
|þ241
§¨¦710
§¨¦5
M
§¨¦605
§¨¦105
FutureDevelopmentAreasResidentialR-1 5,000R-1 6,000R-1 7,500R-1 8,500R-1 10,000R-2R-3R-3-OCommercial
C-P
C-1
C-2
C-3
H-M
C-M
Mixed-Use
M-U
Manufacturing
M-1
M-2
Open Space
O-S
O-S (PM) - Obsolete
O-S (PU) - Obsolete
Specific Plan
SP 85-1 (Rancho Los Amigos)
SP 88-1 (Rancho Business Park)
SP 89-1 (Stonewood)
SP 90-1 (Florence/I-5)
SP 91-2 (Lakewood/Firestone)
SP 01-1 (Downey Landing)
DDSP (Downtown Downey)
TLSP (Tierra Luna)
Other
P
PUD
P-B - Obsolete
Figure 3-1
Residential
R-1 5,000
R-1 6,000
R-1 7,500
R-1 8,500
R-1 10,000
R-2
R-3
R-3-O
Commercial
C-P
C-1
C-2
C-3
H-M
C-M
Mixed-Use
M-U
Manufacturing
M-1
M-2
Open Space
O-S
O-S (PM) - Obsolete
O-S (PU) - Obsolete
Specific Plan
SP 85-1 (Rancho Los Amigos)
SP 88-1 (Rancho Business Park)
SP 89-1 (Stonewood)
SP 90-1 (Florence/I-5)
SP 91-2 (Lakewood/Firestone)
SP 01-1 (Downey Landing)
DDSP (Downtown Downey)
TLSP (Tierra Luna)
Other
P
PUD
P-B - Obsolete
Existing Land Use and Future Development Activity
Future Development Areas
Figure 3-1: Downey Future Land Use Patterns
26
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
• Census journey-to-work data fails to capture
people who commute by bicycle one or two
days per week.
• Journey-to-work data does not account for
commuters with multiple modes of travel to
and from work, such as commuters that ride a
bicycle to a transit station before transferring to
transit for the remainder of their journey to work.
• No separate accounting of shopping, school, or recreational trips
is made in the Census; these trips make up more than half of
the person trips on a typical weekday and a significantly greater
proportion on the weekend. These trips also tend to be short to
medium in length and therefore can be well suited for bicycling.
• Journey-to-work reports information for adult work trips, but does
not request data on school trips, which are much more likely to be
bicycling trips because school-aged individuals cannot drive until
the latter half of their high school years.
The SCAG’s Year 2000 Post-Census Regional Travel Survey, which
surveyed 17,000 households in the 6-county Los Angeles area, found
that 1% of all trips in the region are by bicycle. Bicycle commuting rates
in Los Angeles County have risen since 2000 (from 0.6% to 0.8%), so it is
likely that overall bicycle trips have risen as well.
Table 3-2 summarizes bicycle ridership estimates for commute and non-
commute cyclists. According to the 2013 American Community Survey
(5-year estimates), there were 28,698 students from grades 1 to 12 and in
college in Downey. Based on previous data collected in a similarly-sized
city in Los Angeles County, and data collected by LA County Metro,
approximately 2% of students in elementary school or college ride a
bicycle to school. Based on these assumptions (28,698 x 2%), Downey
would have an estimated 574 student cyclists. Approximately 1,489 of
Downey workers commute by transit (reported in the 2013 ACS 5-Year
Estimates). According to on-board bus and rail surveys conducted by
Metro in 2001, approximately 1.2% of transit riders cycle to transit stops;
therefore, Downey would have about 18 home-to-transit cyclists (1,489 x
1.2%).
Commute trips represent a minority of bicycle trips. To get a fuller sense
of bicycling in Downey, one must account for the other reasons for which
people use bicycles. The National Bicycle & Walking Study, published
by the Federal Highway Administration in 1995, estimated that for every
commute trip made by bicycle, there were 1.74 trips made for shopping,
social, and other utilitarian purposes. Assuming the average commuter
makes two trips per day, we can estimate the total number of commute
trips to be 1,386 (693 commuters x 2 trips per commuter). We can then
estimate the number of additional non-commute trips in Downey to be
2,411 (1,386 commute trips x 1.74 non-commute trips).
Additionally, cycling is a popular recreational activity for all age groups.
While portions of this plan are focused on encouraging bicycling as a
form of transportation, recreational riders, with encouragement, may
transition to bicycling commuters. Similarly, recreational cycling can be a
popular family activity, and children who ride with parents may be more
likely to bike to school or with their friends. Regardless, Downey has a
mild climate, flat terrain, and many parks, schools, and other community
destinations within a 10-minute bicycle ride of downtown or residential
neighborhoods.
Table 3-2: Downey Bicyclists by Trip Group
Type of Commuter Daily Bicycle
Commuters Daily Bicycle Trips
Worker (Home-to-work trips)101 202
Student (Home-to-school trips)574 1,148
Transit Rider (Home-to-transit
trips)
18 36
Totals 693 1,386
Source: American Communities Survey, 2013 (5-year estimates), LA County Metro, Fehr & Peers 2014.
27
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
The Federal Highway Administration and U.S. Department of
Transportation released in May 2010 the National Bicycle & Walking
Study: 15 Year Status Report. The agencies found that between the initial
report in 1995 and household survey data collected in 2009, bicycling
activity had increased in general, though not to the goal of doubling
walking and biking trips that was set in 1995. Interestingly, though only
one percent of respondents in the 2009 National Households Travel
Survey said that they made everyday trips by bike, 12 percent said that
they had ridden a bike in the past week.
Future bicycle trips will depend on a number of factors such as the
availability of well-connected facilities, appropriate education and
promotion programs designed to encourage cycling, and location,
density, and type of future land development. Cities with thoughtful
bikeway plans and meaningful implementation programs have found
high levels of correlation between bicycle facilities and number of
cyclists. Three cities with such plans – Portland, San Francisco, and
Seattle – found that the number of cyclists on a bicycle corridor after it
was improved was double or triple the previous count. More generally,
the 2010 National Bicycle & Walking Study: 15 Year Status Report found
that between 1990 and 2008 funding for bike and pedestrian projects
increased from less than 0.5 percent of federal transportation funding
to about one percent. Over that same time, pedestrian and bicycle trips
increased by about 50 percent.
With appropriate bicycle facilities in place and implementation of
employer trip reduction programs, the bicycle mode split could increase
significantly above its current rate. According to the methodology
adopted by Metro and outlined in their Bicycle Transportation Strategic
Plan (Volume 2), cities can expect to see a 279% increase in bicycling
upon build-out of a complete bicycle network. By expanding bicycle
facilities that encourage a broad cross section of bicyclists and improve
safety, Downey could increase the current mode split, which would result
in over 10,000 bicycle trips daily by 2020, as shown in Table 3-3.
Existing Bicycle Facilities and Programs
The California Streets and Highways Code designates three classes of
bikeways: Class I, Class II, and Class III. Class I bikeways are also known
as “bike paths” or “shared-use paths.” These facilities are constructed on
separated right-of-way, intended exclusively for bicycles and pedestrians
with minimal interference by motorized vehicles. Class II bikeways, also
frequently referred to as “bike lanes,” provide designated right-of-way for
bicyclists typically by painting a separated space on the same roadway
used by motorized vehicles. The use of Class II bikeways by motorists
or pedestrians is prohibited except to cross the bike lane or to park.
Class III bikeways, frequently referred to as “bike routes,” are typically
designated on the roadway by signs and painted “sharrows.” Class III
bikeways are generally provided where the vehicle speeds and volumes
of a roadway tend to be lower. Figure 3-2 illustrates the three different
classes of bikeways.
Currently, two regional Class I bicycle facilities exist in Downey. The Rio
Hondo Bike Path and the San Gabriel River Path run along the west
and east sides of the city, respectively. These bicycle paths are popular
recreational destinations as well as important regional connectors
between Downey, the Gateways Cities region, and other parts of Los
Angeles County.
In addition to the Class I bikeways, end-of-trip bike parking exists at the
library near Downey Civic Center and Downey High School. Bicyclists
can connect to transit at the Downey Bus Depot and the Metro Green
Line Station, storing their bicycle in short-term parking or long-term
Table 3-3: Downey Existing and Future Bicycling Activity
2013 2020
Number of daily bicycle commuters 693 1,933
Number of daily bicycle commute trips 1,386 3,866
Daily Non-Commute Bicycle Trips 2,411 6,727
Total Daily Bicycle Trips 3,797 10,594
Source: American Communities Survey, 2013 (5-year estimates), LA County Metro, Fehr & Peers 2014.
28
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
parking (Metro Green Line Station only), loading the bicycle onto bus-
mounted bike racks on Downey Link buses and Metro buses, or bringing
it on the Metro Green Line. Figure 3-3 illustrates the locations of these
bicycle facilities throughout the City.
Although there are no ongoing bicycle safety or education programs in
Downey, several safety and education activities have occurred in recent
years, including:
• National Night Out Bicycle Safety Workshop in August 2013
• Need to Know Bicycle Safety Education Course sponsored by LA
County Metro in August 2013
• Safe Moves City Traffic
Safety Rodeo Course in
June 2014
• Downey Kids Bike
Festival in June 2014
Bicycle Collisions
Analysis
Table 3-4 lists the 16
intersections with the highest
frequency of collisions. The
list is based on the number
of collisions at a given
intersection between 2009
and 2014, and is not adjusted
for vehicle or bicyclist volumes.
A map displaying reported
bicycle collisions over this
period is shown in Figure 3-4.
Figure 3-2: Bicycle Facility Types
Table 3-4: Bicycle Collision Frequency
Intersection of Incident
Number
of
Collisions
Imperial Hwy & Columbia Way 4
Imperial Hwy & Lakewood Blvd 4
Stewart and Gray Rd & Rives Ave 4
Stewart and Gray Rd & Paramount
Blvd
4
Bellflower Blvd & I-105 Fwy 4
Stewart and Gray Rd & Downey Ave3
Stewart and Gray Rd & Lakewood
Blvd
3
Imperial Hwy & Woodruff Ave 3
Firestone Blvd & Rives Ave 3
Firestone Blvd & Paramount Blvd 3
Firestone Blvd & Woodruff Ave 3
Florence Ave & Old River School Rd3
Florence Ave & Wiley Burke Ave 3
Paramount Blvd & De Palma St 3
Lakewood Blvd & Gardendale St 3
Lakewood Blvd & I-105 Fwy 3
Source: City of Downey, Fehr & Peers 2014.
Graded Shoulders Recommended
Provides a completely separated right-of-way
for exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians
with crossow minimized.
CLASS I - Multi-Use Path
CLASS II - Bike Lane
Provides a striped lane for one-way bike travel
on a street or highway.
CLASS III - Bike Route
Provides a shared use with pedestrians or
motor vehicle trac, typically on lower
volume roadways.
Bike
Lane
Bike Lane
Sign
Bike Lane
Sign
Travel LaneTravel Lane
Solid
White Stripe
Solid
White Stripe
Parking and Bike Lane
BIKE LANE
BIKE LANE
Shared Use
Travel Lane
Shared Use
Travel Lane
BIKE ROUTE
BIKE PATH
NOMOTORVEHICLESORMOTORIZEDBICYCLES
BIKE ROUTE
Bike Route
Sign
Bike Route
Sign
29
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
!(
!!
!!!!
!!
!(!(
!(!(
Rive
s
A
v
e
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Suv
a
S
t
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
d
Gar
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
5th
S
t
Imp
e
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
T
e
l
e
g
r
a
p
h
R
d
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Be
l
l
f
l
o
w
e
r
B
l
v
d
Foster Rd
D
o
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Par
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
Pat
t
o
n
R
d
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
W
a
y
Ala
m
e
d
a
S
t
Twe
e
d
y
L
n
Firestone
B
l
v
d
Woo
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Downey
Norwalk
Pico Rivera
Montebello
South
Gate
Bell
Commerce
Bellflower
Lynwood
Santa Fe
Springs
Paramount
Bell Gardens
Cudahy
LA County Unincorporated
§¨¦5
WarrenHigh School
DowneyCivic Center
§¨¦605
§¨¦105
DowneyHigh School
!
Metro Green Line:
Short-Term Bike Parking
Long-Term Bike Parking (Bike Lockers)
Green Line Park-n-Ride Facility
Connections to Buses with Racks
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Metro Green Line:
Green Line Bike Lockers/Storage!
Downey Bus Depot:
Short-Term Bike Parking
Connections to Buses with Racks
!
!
M
Metro Green Line:Lakewood Blvd
Bicycle Parking at Library
Existing Bikeways and Bicycle Support Facilities
Figure 3-3
Bike Path (Class I)
Bike Lane (Class II)
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Bike Route (Class III)
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Planned Bicycle Facilities
!!Under/Overpass
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
N
Bicycle Support Facilities
!(End-of-trip Bicycle Facilities
!(Bicycle Transport Facilities
!(Changing/Storing Clothes and Equipment
Park
n School
Figure 3-3: Existing Bikeways and Bicycle Support Facilities
30
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
Figure 3-4: Bicycle-Involved Collisions
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
nn
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
nn
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n n
n
nn
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
nn
n
n
n
n
n
n
n n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
nnn
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n!(
!!
!!!!
!!
!P
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
Rive
s
A
v
e
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Suv
a
S
t
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
d
Gar
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
5th
S
t
Imp
e
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
T
e
l
e
g
r
a
p
h
R
d
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Be
l
l
f
l
o
w
e
r
B
l
v
d
Foster Rd
D
o
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Par
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
Pat
t
o
n
R
d
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
W
a
y
Ala
m
e
d
a
S
t
Twe
e
d
y
L
n
Firestone
B
l
v
d
Woo
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Downey
Norwalk
Pico Rivera
Montebello
South
Gate
Bell
Commerce
Bellflower
Lynwood
Santa Fe
Springs
Paramount
Bell Gardens
Cudahy
LA County Unincorporated
§¨¦5
WarrenHigh School
DowneyCivic Center
§¨¦605
§¨¦105
DowneyHigh School
!
M
Metro Green Line:Lakewood Blvd
Downey_BicycleCollisions_sum_ft2pt_2
Bicycle Collisions
!(1
!(2
!(3
!(4
Fatality
!P1
!!ExPedestrianFacilities
Existing Bike Path (Class I)
allroads_downey
<all other values>
Map_FT
1 - Freeway
2 - HOV Lane
3 - Expressway
4 - Principal Arterial
5 - Minor Arterial
6 - Major Collector
7 - Minor Collector
8 - Ramp
Downey
detailedroads_downey
Downey_MASK
Park
City of Downey Bicycle Involved Collisions
(2009-2014)
Figure 3-4
Bike Path (Class I)
Bike Lane (Class II)
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Bike Route (Class III)
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Planned Bicycle Facilities
!!Under/Overpass
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
N
Bicycle Collisions
!(1
!(2
!(3
!(4
Fatality
!P 1Source: City of Downey, Fehr & Peers, 2014
Note: Collisions mapped to intersection within 150'
31
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
During this period, crashes occurred primarily along major arterials such
as Florence Avenue, Firestone Boulevard, Stewart and Gray Road, and
Imperial Highway.
For all collisions between 2009 and 2014, the top two PCFs were travel
on the wrong side of the road and automobile right-of-way violations,
accounting for 62% of collisions. Table 3-5 summarizes all PCFs for
bicycle-involved crashes between 2009 and 2014.
Table 3-6 shows the
frequency of collision
type for all bicycle-
involved crashes
between 2009 and 2014.
In 74% of these crashes,
the crash type was a
broadside collision. Table
3-7 summarizes the time
of day data for collisions.
The time of day data
was grouped into four
categories: school/
business hours (7:00
AM to 4:59 PM), evening
hours (5:00 to 8:59 PM),
night hours (9:00 PM to
2:59 AM), and morning
hours (3:00 to 6:59 AM).
Nearly two-thirds of
bicycle collisions occur
between 7:00 AM and
4:59 PM, and 92% of all
collisions occur between
7:00 AM and 8:59 PM.
Table 3-8 provides information on the involvement of alcohol in collisions.
The PCF “driving under the influence” was documented in one incident
between 2009 and 2014.
Community Input Process
The development of the Bicycle Master Plan comes as part of an
effort by the City of Downey to address local and regional desires to
enhance the viability of bicycling as a mode of transportation and reduce
transportation system impacts on local communities. By making biking
easier and safer, the City can better manage its transportation network
and reduce its overall greenhouse gas emissions resulting from single
occupant driving. The process to develop this plan began in May 2014.
Public Events
The goals, policies, recommendations, and action items in this Plan are
the outcome of a substantial public outreach effort by the City. During
June and July 2014, the project team accepted public input to the Plan at
various events. Project team members talked to the public about the Plan
Table 3-5: Primary Collision Factors
PCF OccurrencesPercent
Wrong Side of Road 84 37%
Auto R/W Violation 57 25%
Unknown 28 12%
Traffic Signals and Signs26 12%
Improper Turning 9 4%
Other Hazardous
Movement
5 2%
Unsafe Speed 4 2%
Other 3 1%
Source: City of Downey, Fehr & Peers 2014.
Table 3-6: Frequency of Collision Type
Type of CollisionOccurrencesPercent
Broadside 167 74%
Other 27 12%
Sideswipe 10 4%
Head-On 8 4%
Rear-End 6 3%
Vehicle - Pedestrian 6 3%
Hit Object 1 0%
Not Stated 1 0%
Source: City of Downey, Fehr & Peers 2014.
Table 3-7: Collisions by Time of Day
Time of Day Percent
School/business hours 7:00 AM to 4:59 PM 62%
Evening hours 5:00 to 8:59 PM 29%
Night hours 9:00 PM to 2:59 AM 6%
Morning hours 3:00 to 6:59 AM 2%
Source: City of Downey, Fehr & Peers 2014.
Table 3-8: Alcohol-Involved Bicycle Collisions
LocationType of
Collision
Dir. Of
Travel 1
Movement
Prec.
Coll. 1
Dir. Of
Travel 2
Movement
Prec. Coll.
2
PCF
Castana Av
& Prichard
St
Hit ObjectSouthProceeding
Straight
--Driving
Under
Influence
Source: City of Downey, Fehr & Peers 2014.
32
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
at the “Tour de Downey” event on Saturday, June 14,
at a Summer Concert at Furman Park on Wednesday,
July 2, and at a Community Workshop on Saturday,
July 12.
During the Tour de Downey event, project staff
manned an information table about the Bicycle Master
Plan and conducted a mapping exercise to solicit input
about the bicycling environment in Downey and future bicycle facilities.
Visitors were encouraged to fix sticky notes to the map identifying
specific roadways and locations with positive or negative input or
recommendations. All of the sticky note comments were documented
and categorized by staff. The most common themes from respondents
across all streets identified were: adding bike lanes, adding connections
to river bike paths, and concern about vehicular speed and volume.
Adding a bike share program, especially in conjunction with access to
the Metro Green Line Lakewood Station, was suggested several times.
During the Community Workshop, a dot exercise was conducted in which
participants prioritized bicycle facility and parking types. Participants
demonstrated a preference for cycle tracks over signed bike routes.
Figures 3-5 and 3-6 display the results of the dot exercise.
Additional community workshops were conducted on August 28, 2014
and December 11, 2014. Summaries of all outreach activities can be found
in Appendix A.
Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
A survey was circulated in English and Spanish to assess the general
needs for bicycling in the City. The survey was hosted online at www.
bikedowney.com and was available at all public outreach events in paper
and digital format. The survey asked respondents to rate their comfort
bicycling in Downey, their frequency of cycling for specific purposes, and
to identify challenges and opportunities for cycling in the City. Several
questions allowed open-ended responses to identify favorite routes,
most challenging streets, and most challenging intersections for cycling.
In total, 232 survey responses were collected.
The project team analyzed the survey responses, documenting common
themes and terms used in the open-ended responses. This analysis was
used to determine the frequency of high priority topics. For example,
when asked what made certain streets challenging to bike on, the most
common themes were volume and speed of traffic or lack of bike lanes.
Firestone Boulevard and Florence Avenue were the two most frequently
cited “challenging to bike on” roads.
0
5
10
15
20
25
Cycle Track Buffered/Colored Bike
Lanes
Bike Path (Class I)Bike Lanes with Road
Diet
Bike Lane (Class II)Bike Route with
Signage Only (Class III)
Bike Boulevard
Figure 3 -5: Preferred Bicycle Facility Type
Female (Adult)Male (Adult)Male (Minor)Female (Minor)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Inverted - U Post and Loop In-street Bicycle Corral Bicycle Lockers Artistic/Branded Bicycle
Rack
Bicycle Transit Center
Parking
Figure 3 -6: Preferred Bicycle Parking Type
Female (Adult)Male (Adult)Male (Minor)Female (Minor)
33
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Web Presence
A public website (www.bikedowney.com) was developed to support
public engagement and communication about the Plan. This website
hosted the survey discussed above. It also communicated Plan updates,
posted draft versions of the Plan, and included bicycle safety content. A
Facebook page was also created and kept up to date with public events
and progress of the Plan, and can be accessed at www.facebook.com/
bikedowney.
Summary of Key Issues
Based on data collection including field visits, survey responses, a
public input dot exercise, a public input mapping exercise, vehicle
counts, bicycle counts, and a collision analysis, several key issues were
identified related to bicycling in Downey. These key issues helped guide
the development of the proposed bicycle network included in this Plan.
First, there is a latent demand for bicycling in Downey. Figure 3-7 shows
the survey responses to the question “In your opinion, do [the potential
challenges and obstacles to biking listed below] discourage people
from biking in Downey?” Eighty-five percent of survey respondents
thought that the lack of bicycle lanes was an obstacle that discouraged
people from biking, and 80% of respondents thought that speeding
was an obstacle that discouraged people from biking. Developing
a comprehensive network of bicycle facilities visible to residents of
Downey could encourage people to consider riding a bicycle for the first
time and to ride more often.
Second, many arterials have two lanes in each direction and parking
lanes on both sides, but support lower-than-expected traffic volumes.
Several of these arterials experience speeding concerns, based on
vehicle counts, speed surveys, and survey responses. Changes to the
lane configurations on these arterials could provide sufficient space for
bicycle lanes, encourage motorists to drive more slowly, and provide
connections throughout the city, while minimally impeding corridor
performance and reducing collisions.
Finally, there is a lack of bicycle connections to some of the most valuable
resources in the city. Many residents enjoy riding on the bike paths along
the east and west sides of the City, but experience a difficult time biking
to them. Similarly, the Metro Green Line Station provides regional access
to jobs and resources, but lacks designated bicycle facilities between
the station and neighborhoods within Downey.
Figures 3-8 and 3-9 illustrate the 1-, 5-, and 10-minute bike travel times
from the Downey Civic Center, Warren High School, and the Metro Green
Line Station. Figure 3-8 shows the bike travel times when all streets are
included in the analysis; the coverage of the City within a 5-minute bike
ride of these three destinations is relatively comprehensive. Figure 3-9
shows a similar analysis, excluding streets with six lanes. The coverage
of the City within a 5-minute bike ride is considerably diminished,
particularly from the Metro Green Line Station and at the edges of
the City. The proposed bicycle network is designed connect these
destinations to neighborhoods and to each other, on comfortable, safe
facilities in order to support better multi-modal access through the City.
Figure 3-7: Top Responses to “Challenges to Bicycling” Survey Question
0%20%40%60%80%100%
No bike lanes
Speeding
No bike parking
Streets are too wide or busy
Parked cars present a danger to me
34
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
This Bicycle Master Plan proposes a network
of bicycle facilities including routes that could
immediately support bicycle lanes and bicycle routes,
providing comprehensive coverage of the City to
key destinations, as well as projects that would help
maximize the connectivity of facilities throughout the
city, improve access to the regional bike paths, and
provide connections to adjacent cities.
35
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Figure 3-8: Bike Shed Analysis (All Streets)
!(
!!
!!!!
!!
Rive
s
A
v
e
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Suv
a
S
t
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
d
Gar
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
5th
S
t
Imp
e
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
T
e
l
e
g
r
a
p
h
R
d
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Be
l
l
f
l
o
w
e
r
B
l
v
d
Foster Rd
D
o
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Par
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
Pat
t
o
n
R
d
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
W
a
y
Ala
m
e
d
a
S
t
Twe
e
d
y
L
n
Firestone
B
l
v
d
Woo
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Downey
Norwalk
Pico Rivera
South
Gate
Bell
Commerce
Bellflower
Lynwood
Santa Fe
Springs
Paramount
Bell Gardens
Cudahy
LA County Unincorporated
§¨¦5
WarrenHigh School
DowneyCivic Center
§¨¦605
§¨¦105
DowneyHigh School
M
Metro Green Line:Lakewood Blvd
Estimated Bike Travel Times from Downey Civic Center/Downey High School,
Warren High School, and Metro Green Line Station
(Includes All Roadways)
Figure 3-8
Bike Path (Class I)
Bike Lane (Class II)
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Bike Route (Class III)
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Planned Bicycle Facilities
!!Under/Overpass
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
N
Bike Travel Time/Distance (Minutes/Miles)
1/.5
5/1
10/1.5
n School
Park
36
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
!(
!!
!!!!
!!
Rive
s
A
v
e
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Suv
a
S
t
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
d
Gar
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
5th
S
t
Imp
e
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
T
e
l
e
g
r
a
p
h
R
d
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Be
l
l
f
l
o
w
e
r
B
l
v
d
Foster Rd
D
o
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Par
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
Pat
t
o
n
R
d
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
W
a
y
Ala
m
e
d
a
S
t
Twe
e
d
y
L
n
Firestone
B
l
v
d
Woo
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Downey
Norwalk
Pico Rivera
South
Gate
Bell
Commerce
Bellflower
Lynwood
Santa Fe
Springs
Paramount
Bell Gardens
Cudahy
LA County Unincorporated
§¨¦5
WarrenHigh School
DowneyCivic Center
§¨¦605
§¨¦105
DowneyHigh School
M
Metro Green Line:Lakewood Blvd
Estimated Bike Travel Times from Downey Civic Center/Downey High School,
Warren High School, and Metro Green Line Station
(Excludes 6 Lane Roadways)
Figure 3-9
Bike Path (Class I)
Bike Lane (Class II)
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Bike Route (Class III)
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Planned Bicycle Facilities
!!Under/Overpass
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
N1/.5
5/1
10/1.5
Bike Travel Time/Distance (Minutes/Miles)
Park
n School
Figure 3-9: Bike Shed Analysis (No 6-Lane Streets)
37
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
4. PROPOSED
BICYCLE
FACILITIES
Proposed Bicycle Network
Based on the existing conditions in Downey and the public input
obtained throughout the Bicycle Master Plan process, new bicycle
facilities are proposed in two phases.
Phase I
Phase I projects for the proposed bicycle network include Class II and
Class III bikeways. Table 4-1 summarizes the type, length, and location of
each facility. In total, 31 Phase I projects include over 11 miles of Class II
bike lanes along with 22 miles of Class III bike routes. Figure 4-1 illustrates
the extent and connectivity of the proposed facilities for Phase I.
The proposed Class II bikeways along Woodruff Avenue between
Firestone Boulevard and Foster Road could be constructed without
any other change to the existing cross-section of the street. The other
proposed Class II bikeways along Old River School Road, Downey
Avenue, Brookshire Avenue, Columbia Way, and Gallatin Road would
require a “road makeover” – sometimes referred to as a road diet – to
transform the street from two lanes in both directions and parking on
both sides to one lane in each direction with a center turn lane, bicycle
lanes, and parking on both sides.
Road diets are traffic calming tools designed to encourage motorists to
obey the speed limit, improving safety for all road users and adjacent
residents. In Downey, as discussed in the previous chapter, speeding
is a particular problem on residential streets (secondary arterials) that
have excess capacity and width. The road diet reduces average speed,
maintains operational efficiency based on existing and forecasted traffic
volumes, and improves safety.
Table 4-1: Summary of Proposed Phase I Bikeways
Location From To Type of
Facility
Length
(miles)
Guatemala Ave Bangle Rd (I-5)Gainford St Class III1.13
Gainford St/Tecum RdGuatemala AveFlorence Ave Class III 0.27
Old River School RdFlorence AveImperial HwyClass II/III2.39
Tweedy Ln Bangle Rd (I-5)Florence Ave Class III1.07
Rives Ave Florence AveImperial Hwy Class III2.39
Downey Ave Gallatin Rd 5th St Class II1.23
Downey Ave 5th St Firestone BlvdClass III 0.3
Downey Ave Firestone BlvdGardendale StClass II2.04
Brookshire Ave Gallatin Rd Cherokee Dr Class III0.86
Brookshire Ave Cherokee DrGardendale StClass II/III2.63
Patton Rd/Birchdale AveFirestone BlvdMeadow Rd Class III 1.42
Hanwell Ave Adoree St Gardendale St/
Foster Rd
Class III0.34
Columbia Way Lakewood BlvdFoster Rd Class II0.82
Passons Blvd Telegraph RdI-5 Overpass Class III0.25
Lemoran Ave/Haledon
Ave
I-5 OverpassFlorence Ave Class III 0.74
Woodruff Ave Florence AveFirestone BlvdClass III0.91
Woodruff Ave Firestone BlvdFoster Rd Class II1.53
Gallatin Rd Tweedy Ln Lakewood BlvdClass II0.92
Gallatin Rd Lakewood BlvdI-5 Freeway Class III0.97
Suva St Scout Ave Paramount BlvdClass III0.85
Dinwiddie St Rio Hondo DrOld River School RdClass III0.56
4th St / Fostoria StOld River School RdParamount BlvdClass III 0.71
5th St / Cecilia StParamount BlvdPico Vista Rd Class III1.89
Stewart and Gray RdKarmont AveFirestone BlvdClass III3.18
Alameda St Paramount BlvdLakewood BlvdClass III0.96
Washburn Rd Bellflower BlvdRegentview AveClass III 0.76
Quill Dr Los Padrinos DrParamount BlvdClass III0.91
Donovan St/Rose Ave/
James St
Brookshire AveColumbia WayClass III0.57
Congressman Steve
Horn Way
Columbia WayBellflower BlvdClass III0.54
Adoree St Lakewood BlvdColumbia WayClass III0.33
Blodgett Ave/Priscilla StGardendale StLakewood BlvdClass III 0.13
Gardendale St/Foster RdHollydale ParkSan Gabriel RiverClass II3.93
Total Mileage 37.5
38
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
!(
!!
!!!!
!!
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
Rive
s
A
v
e
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Suv
a
S
t
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
d
Gar
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
5th
S
t
Imp
e
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
T
e
l
e
g
r
a
p
h
R
d
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Be
l
l
f
l
o
w
e
r
B
l
v
d
Foster Rd
D
o
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Par
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
Pat
t
o
n
R
d
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
W
a
y
Ala
m
e
d
a
S
t
Twe
e
d
y
L
n
Firestone
B
l
v
d
Woo
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Din
w
i
d
d
i
e
S
t
4th
S
t
Guate
m
a
l
a
A
v
e
Quil
l
D
r
Washburn Rd
Hal
e
d
o
n
A
v
e
Lem
o
r
a
n
A
v
e
Pas
s
o
n
s
B
l
v
d
Ha
n
w
e
l
l
A
v
e
Adoree St
Blod
g
e
t
t
A
v
e
Do
n
o
v
a
n
S
t
Downey
Norwalk
Pico Rivera
Montebello
South
Gate
Bell
Commerce
Bellflower
Lynwood
Santa Fe
Springs
Paramount
Bell Gardens
Huntington Park
Cudahy
LA County Unincorporated
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
§¨¦5
WarrenHigh School
DowneyCivic Center
§¨¦605
§¨¦105
DowneyHigh School
!
!
!
M
Metro Green LineLakewood Blvd
Existing and Proposed Bikeways
Figure 4-1
N
Gateway Cities Bike Project Idea Corridor
n School
Park
Bike Path (Class I)
Bike Lane (Class II)
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Buffered Bike Lane (Class II)
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Planned Bicycle Facilities
!!Under/Overpass
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Gateway Cities Bike Project Idea Location
'Existing Bicycle Path Access Points
Phase II Bicycle Improvements
Bike Route (Class III)
Potential Eco-Rapid Line Station
Gardendale Street
!M
Note: This graphic is conceptual in nature, and is dependent on availability of funding and further study of alignments.
Figure 4-1: Existing and Proposed Bikeways and Facilities
39
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Table 4-2: Summary of Proposed Phase II Projects
LocationFrom To Type of Facility Length
(miles)
Florence AveOld River
School Rd
Rio Hondo
Bike Path
Connects N/S Class II and Class
III bikeways to Rio Hondo Bike
Path
0.21
Florence AveRives AveTweedy LnConnects two Class III bike
routes to provide continuous N/S
connection
0.17
Florence AveHaledon AveWoodruff AveConnects two Class III bike
routes to provide continuous N/S
connection
0.21
Paramount
Blvd
4th St5th StConnects two Class III bike
routes to provide continuous E/W
connection
0.04
Paramount
Blvd
Quill DrAlameda StConnects two Class III bike
routes to provide continuous E/W
connection
0.29
Firestone
Blvd
Woodruff AveWoodruff AveConnects Class II bike lane to
Class III bike route to provide
continuous N/S connection
0.08
Lakewood
Blvd
Alameda StColumbia
Way
Connects Class II bike lane to
Class III bike route to provide
connection through Downey
Landing and to Metro Green Line
0.15
Lakewood
Blvd
Adoree StPriscilla StConnects Class III bike route to
Metro Green Line Station
0.14
Bellflower
Blvd
Congressman
Steve Horn
Way
Washburn RdConnects two Class III bike
routes to provide continuous E/W
connection
0.24
Old River
School Rd
Imperial HwyGardendale
St
Connects two Class II bike lanes
to the future Eco Rapid Station
0.5
Rives AveImperial HwyGardendale
St
Connects two Class II bike lanes
to the future Eco Rapid Station
0.5
Pico Vista RdSan Gabriel
River
-Ped/bike bridge across flood
wash would provide connection
between Downey bike network,
Rio San Gabriel Park and San
Gabriel River Trail
-
Downey
Norwalk Rd
San Gabriel
River
-Ped/bike bridge across flood
wash would provide additional
connection between Downey
bike network and San Gabriel
River Trail
-
Total mileage 2.53
In addition, road diets allow the reallocation of right-of-way from motorists
to other uses such as streetscaping or bicycle lanes. The amount of
reallocated right-of-way on the proposed segments would permit the
construction of high-quality bicycle lanes with a buffer between the
bicycles and the moving vehicles, while maintaining existing parking on
both sides of the street.
The recommended Class III bikeway facilities are for narrower residential
streets that experience less vehicular traffic. These bikeways would
include signage and wayfinding, on-street sharrows, and could include
additional traffic calming elements. In some cases, such as on Old River
School Road and Brookshire Avenue, Class II bike lanes will transition
to Class III bike routes in advance of intersections that require higher
vehicular capacity, in order to retain two travel lanes in each direction
through the intersection.
Phase II
Phase II projects would build on the momentum from the Phase I
projects, connecting parts of the network that include more space-
constrained intersections and street segments. These projects may
require innovative treatments and adjustments to existing pavement
markings, signal timing, or right-of-way. For example, the Class III bike
routes on Rives Avenue and Tweedy Lane could be connected along a
short segment of Florence Avenue to provide a continuous north-south
connection across the City, but would likely require changes to Florence
Avenue along that segment. These opportunities and challenges have
been identified in Table 4-2. In total, Phase II projects include 2.5 miles
of on-street connections such as bike lanes and two capital-intensive
bicycle/pedestrian bridges.
Once Phase I Improvements are implemented, public support may be
strong enough to begin discussions about more difficult connections
in the bicycle network. In addition, capital-intensive projects such as
bicycle/pedestrian bridges require several years for planning, design
40
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
and engineering. Including these projects in the
Bicycle Master Plan provides a framework for future
improvement to the bicycle network throughout
Downey.
Proposed End-of-Trip Bicycle Facilities
Bicycle parking ordinances allow a city to provide end-of-trip bicycle
facilities in a streamlined, transparent manner. The process of developing
an ordinance includes setting appropriate levels of bicycle parking for
different land uses, establishing design standards, and developing siting
requirements to ensure that installed bike parking is functional and
appropriate in the land use context.
Bicycle parking is generally categorized into two types: short-term
parking and long-term parking. Short-term parking consists of bicycle
racks located outside of buildings or in the public rights-of-way (on
sidewalks, vehicular parking spaces, or parks). Short-term bike racks
should be convenient and in close proximity to a bicyclist’s destination.
Long-term parking provides a high level of security for a bicycle and the
items attached to a bicycle (e.g. lights, panniers). Long-term bike parking
includes bike lockers, bike rooms, bike cages, and bike stations. Table
4-3 describes each type of bike parking, intended users, and related
location and equipment considerations.
As described in Chapter 2, requirements for bicycle parking are identified
in the Downey Municipal Code, Section 9530.06. Bicycle parking is
required for non-residential land uses over 50,000 square feet. The code
does not currently provide guidance for bicycle rack design, siting, or
residential building requirements. Bicycle parking recommendations are
also described in the Downtown Downey Specific Plan (2010) Mobility
Chapter. Bike racks, lockers and bike stations (with or without attendants)
are identified in the Downtown Specific Plan. Phase II recommendations
for the Bicycle Master Plan are based on these previous plans and
policies.
Policy Recommendations
Downey can consider adopting a bicycle parking ordinance that provides
guidance on design, siting and the appropriate levels of bicycle parking
at different land uses. The recently adopted City of Los Angeles bicycle
parking ordinance is one of the most comprehensive in the region, and
the development community is currently working to make sure they
understand how to comply with its provisions and requirements. The
Model California Bicycle Parking Ordinance is another good source for
model language. This section provides specific policy recommendations
to provide bike parking in the City of Downey.
Design and Siting of Bicycle Parking
Include detailed design standards and siting requirements for bicycle
parking in a bicycle parking ordinance. This will ensure that installed
Table 4-3: Summary of Bicycle Parking Types
Bicycle
Parking Type Description Users Location &
Equipment
Short-Term
Parking
Intended for a stay of less than
two hours or a trip not made on
a regular basis.
Convenience and proximity
to destination is the highest
priority.
Retail, restaurant
and professional
service customers
Guests of multi-
family residential
buildings
Bicycle racks in high
visibility areas located
less than 50’ from a
building entrance.
Preferred located in
City right-of-way within
500’ of destinations.
Long-Term
Parking
Intended for a stay of more than
two hours or a trip made on a
regular basis.
A higher level of security (such
as protection from theft of
items not able to be locked
to a bike such as lights, seat
and panniers) and weather
protection are a higher priority
than convenience and proximity
to destination.
Employees at office
buildings, retail,
restaurants and
personal services
Tenants of multi-
family residential
buildings
Can be located further
away from building
entrances and well-
marked with signs.
Examples include
bicycle lockers,
bicycle cages or
rooms, bike station
with attendant.
Source: Fehr & Peers, LACBC, SFMTA
41
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Figure 4-3: Undesirable Bike Rack Designs
Racks that do not support the bicycle frame in more than one place are not
recommended.
Wave Racks: These types of racks do not support the bike frame and
can ruin the wheel if the bike falls over.
Ladder or Comb Racks: These types of racks do not support the bike
frame and can ruin the wheel if the bike falls over.
Wheel-bender / Toast Racks: These types of racks do not support
the bike frame and can ruin the wheel if the bike falls over.
bicycle parking is accessible and functional. Both the City of Los Angeles
Ordinance and the Model California Bicycle Parking Ordinance have
good design and siting language. The Association of Pedestrian and
Bicycle Professionals’ (APBP) Bicycle Parking Design Guidelines also
provide good siting language along with accompanying photos and
graphics. The APBP guide can be provided as a companion reference to
developers and City design review staff. Figures 4-2 and 4-3 summarize
and illustrate preferred bicycle rack designs and undesirable bicycle
rack designs, for short-term and long-term parking.
Public Right-of-Way
The City should continue to provide bicycle parking in the public right-of-
way, particularly along commercial corridors. The City should establish a
program to allow local businesses to request a bike rack for the City to
install in the public right-of-way outside of the establishment. See below
for guidance on siting bicycle racks in the public right-of-way.
The existing municipal code allows for signs that prohibit bicycling
parking. If bicycles are regularly observed to be parked by being
affixed to undesirable objects, then it is an indicator that better bicycle
Figure 4-2: Preferred Bike Rack Designs
Short-Term Parking
Inverted - U: The inverted-U is a common and effective type of bicycle
parking that can typically accommodate two bicycles per rack. This
rack fits within a bicycle’s envelope, provides support at two points, and
allows for ease of locking a bicycle frame and wheel. These racks are
appropriate for sidewalks, public facilities, and public garages.
Post and Loop: The post and loop is a variation of the inverted-U and
is also a common and effective type of bicycle parking that can typically
accommodate two bicycles per rack. This rack fits within a bicycle’s
envelope, provides support at two points, and allows for ease of locking
a bicycle frame and wheel. These racks are appropriate for sidewalks,
public facilities, and public garages.
Artistic / Branded Bicycle Rack: Some cities have developed or
commissioned the design of artistic or branded racks for their cities
or neighborhoods. These racks can take-on a unique shape or be a
variation of a common bicycle parking type and contribute to aesthetics
of the streetscape. It is important that cities consider space required
to accommodate bicycle parking, overall appearance, security, ease of
use, and parking capacity. These racks are appropriate for sidewalks
and public facilities.
Long-Term Parking
Bicycle Lockers: Bicycle lockers provide an enclosed storage space
for each parked bicycle. Bicycles secured in lockers are generally
less vulnerable to theft and damage than those secured to racks. It is
important that cities consider the locking mechanism and shell design
for security purposes and site layout for proper functionality. Lockers
are appropriate in areas where security is a concern and cyclists need
to park their bicycles for extended time periods, such as transit stations.
Bicycle Transit Center Parking: Bicycle transit centers provide secure
and climate-protected bicycle parking. These facilities typically offer
free parking during operating hours, 24-hour parking through paid
memberships, and a variety of cycling services and amenities. These
facilities are most appropriate near major transit hubs.
42
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
Figure 4-4: Bicycle Rack Spacing Recommendations
Source: APBP
Figure 4-6: Sidewalk Bicycle Rack Placement Recommendations
Source: APBP
Figure 4-5: Bicycle Rack Spacing Recommendations when Adjacent to a Wall or
Grouped with Aisles
Source: APBP
43
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
accommodations are needed at that location. Instead of installing signs
prohibiting bike parking, consider installing bike racks and place signs
indicating the proper location for secure bike parking.
Bicycle Rack Siting
Bicycle racks installed in the public right-of-way should be placed to
avoid conflicts with pedestrians and parked vehicles, on sidewalks
typically near the curb. Bicycle racks on private property should be
placed in high visibility areas within 50’ of building entrances. Bicycle
racks should be placed a minimum of 30” (36” preferred) apart to
accommodate two bicycles parking next to one another as shown in
Figure 4-4. Spacing guidance for bicycle racks grouped with aisles is
provided in Figure 4-5. On sidewalks, bicycle racks should generally be
oriented parallel to the curb within the furnishing zone. See Figure 4-6
for spacing recommendations. Racks provided at bus stops or loading
zones should not interfere with boarding or loading.
Bicycle Corrals
Include definitions in the Municipal Code for a bicycle corral (also known
as “In-Street” or “On-Street” bicycle parking). Bicycle corrals are created
by converting on-street parking spaces or other underutilized roadway
space to bicycle parking areas. The City of Los Angeles incentivizes
the use of bicycle corrals in their Municipal Code by allowing all bicycle
The installation of a bike
corral typically yields at
least 10 bicycle parking
spaces for every one
converted car parking
space.
Table 4-4: Model California Bicycle Parking Ordinance
Required Number of Bicycle Parking Spaces
General
Use
Category
Specific Use
Number of Short-
Term Bicycle Parking
Spaces Required
Number of Long-Term
Bicycle Parking Spaces
Required
ResidentialMulti-Family Dwelling
with more than 4 units:
(a) without private
garage or equivalent
separate storage
space for each unit
(b) with private garage
or equivalent separate
storage space for
each unit
(a) [.05] per bedroom
or
[1] per [20] units
(b) [.05] per bedroom
or
[1] per [20] units
(a) [.5] per bedroom
or
[1-4] per [4] units
(b) None
Commercial(a) Office Building
(b) General Retail
(c) Grocery
(d) Restaurant
(e) Parking Garage
(f) Outdoor Parking Lot
(a) [1] per each [20,000]
sq.ft. of floor area
(b) [1] per each [5,000]
sq.ft. of floor area
(c) [1] per each [2,000]
sq.ft. of floor area
(d) [1] per each [2,000]
sq.ft. of floor area
(e) [2] spaces
(f) [1] per [20] motor
vehicle spaces
(a) [1-1.5] per [10,000] sq.ft. of
floor area
(b) [1] per [10,000-12,000] sq.ft.
of floor area
(c) [1] per [10,000-12,000] sq.ft.
of floor area
(d) [1] per [10,000-12,000] sq.ft.
of floor area
(e) [1] per [20] motor vehicle
spaces
(f) [2] spaces
Civic(a) Non-assembly
cultural (e.g., library,
government buildings)
(b) Assembly
(e.g., church, theater,
stadiums, parks)
(c) Schools (K-12)
(d) Colleges and
Universities
(a) [1] per each [8,000
-10,000] sq. ft. of floor
area
(b) Spaces for [2-5]
per cent of maximum
expected daily
attendance
(c) [1] per each [20]
students of planned
capacity
(d) [1] per each [10]
students of
planned capacity
(a) [1 -1.5] per each [10-20]
employees
(b) [1- 1.5] per each [20]
employees
(c) [1] per each [10-20]
employees and [1] per each
[20] students of planned
capacity for grades 6-12
(d) [1] per each [10-20]
employees and [1] per each
[10] students of planned
capacity or [1] per each
[20,000] sq. feet of floor area,
whichever is greater
IndustrialManufacturing and
Production, Agriculture
[2] spaces (Can be
increased at discretion
of Planning/Zoning
Administrator)
[1] per 20 employees
44
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
parking spaces in a bike corral to count toward the
required bicycle parking spaces of the business or
property owner requesting the bicycle corral.
Required Bicycle Parking by Land Use
Adopt bicycle parking requirements by land use. Ratios can be used to
determine the amount of bicycle parking needed for new development
and major renovations. Bicycle parking ratios can be calculated based
on the square footage of each land use, a percentage of car parking
requirements, or using specific
number of units (i.e. number
of employees, or number of
bedrooms). In addition to using
ratios, many communities with
bicycle parking ordinances also
require a minimum number of
bicycle parking spaces. Setting
a minimum (such as two spaces)
is important for buildings that
fall below a square foot or car parking requirement. Table 4-4 provides
recommended numbers of required spaces from the Model California
Bicycle Parking Ordinance.
Licensed Parking Facilities
Require public bicycle parking as a
condition of issuance or renewal of
a license for indoor parking garages
or outdoor parking lots. Siting
requirements should ensure easy
and safe access between the public
right-of-way and the bicycle parking
spaces within the licensed parking
Abandoned, stripped bicycle locked to
bicycle rack
Bicycle Valet at the Tour de
Downey, hosted by LACBC
facility. Bicycle racks should be located at ground level in parking
garages, clearly visible to pedestrian traffic, and away from driveway
conflicts.
Replacement of Vehicle Parking with Bicycle Parking
Allow new or existing automobile parking spaces required by the Code
to be replaced by bicycle parking. The City of Los Angeles allows this at
a ratio of one automobile parking space for every four bicycle parking
spaces provided.
Removal of
Abandoned
Bicycles
Require the removal
of abandoned
bicycles and establish
procedures for doing
so, both on private
property and in the
public right-of-way.
Removal of abandoned bicycles is critical in order to maintain available
bicycle parking supply and prevent the perception that bicycle parking is
leading to blight.
Special Events
Require bicycle parking at special events requiring street closures.
Required bicycle parking should be set as a percentage of expected
daily participants and should be monitored and adjusted year-to-year,
particularly for recurring events. Organizations such as the Downey
Bicycle Coalition could be a vendor or partner to host bicycle valet at
special events, as they did during the Tour de Downey.
Table 4-5: Recommended End-of-Trip Facilities
Location Type of Facility
Furman Park Bicycle corrals
Apollo Park Bicycle corrals
Downey Landing Bicycle corrals
Downtown Downey (5)Bicycle corrals
Along primary and secondary
arterials
Off-street bicycle racks
Metro Green Line StationChanging facilities
Downey Bus Depot Bicycle Lockers
45
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Figure 4-7: Proposed Bicycle Parking
!(
!!
!!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
")
")
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
!
!
!!
$+
$+$+
$+
$+
$+
$+
")
")
")
")
$+
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
#*
Rive
s
A
v
e
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Suv
a
S
t
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
d
Gar
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
5th
S
t
Imp
e
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
T
e
l
e
g
r
a
p
h
R
d
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Be
l
l
f
l
o
w
e
r
B
l
v
d
Foster Rd
D
o
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Par
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
Pat
t
o
n
R
d
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
W
a
y
Ala
m
e
d
a
S
t
Twe
e
d
y
L
n
Firestone
B
l
v
d
Woo
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Downey
Norwalk
Pico Rivera
South
Gate
Bell
Commerce
Bellflower
Lynwood
Santa Fe
Springs
Paramount
Bell Gardens
Cudahy
LA County Unincorporated
§¨¦5
WarrenHigh School
Downey Civic Center
§¨¦605
§¨¦105
Downey High School
!
!
!
M
Metro Green LineLakewood Blvd
Existing and Proposed End-of-Trip Bicycle Parking Facilities
Figure 4-7
Type
#*Bicycle Lockers
")Off-Street Parking
!Off-Street Parking in Public ROW
$+On-Street Bike Corral
NnSchool
Park
(multiple locations at intersection)
46
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
Recommended End-of-Trip Facilities
Recommended end-of-trip facilities include a mix of
on-street bicycle corrals, off-street bicycle parking
in the public right-of-way, and bicycle lockers. On-
street bicycle corrals are recommended at Furman Park and Apollo
Park, along Columbia Way near Downey Landing, and at five locations
in Downtown Downey on Firestone Blvd, Downey Ave, 5th St, and
Paramount Blvd. Off-street bicycle racks are recommended along routes
with many destinations, at high-volume intersections, and along key
connecting routes within the on-street bicycle network. Bicycle lockers
are recommended at the Downey Bus Depot. Figure 4-7 illustrates the
location for all recommended end-of-trip facilities.
In addition to safe bicycle parking, end-of-trip facilities include places
to change and store clothing and equipment. Bicycle storage facilities
are located at the Metro Green Line Station at Lakewood Boulevard. To
augment the current long-term and short-term bicycle parking facilities at
this location, changing areas are recommended.
47
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
5. SUPPORT
PROGRAMS
While engineering and infrastructure
enhancements are critical elements for improving bicycle safety and
encouraging more people to ride a bicycle, educational programming,
encouragement campaigns and enforcement efforts are complementary
to infrastructure investment and essential components of a city’s fully-
developed bicycle strategy. Additionally, conducting evaluation efforts
around all types of bicycle improvements can help demonstrate the
value of investing in a well-developed bicycle strategy.
Education, encouragement and enforcement programs increase the
safety, utility, and viability of infrastructure projects. They often include
a combination of municipal support and volunteer engagement, which
can have an exponential effect on the extent to which a community
embraces a city’s bicycle efforts. Because of this community-supported
model, support programming can have very large effects while relying
on small budgets. Education campaigns should include residents of all
ages, especially emphasizing school-aged children where safe bicycling
habits can be instilled as a life-long lesson.
These types of support programs also ensure compliance with the
criteria required by the former California Bicycle Transportation Account
(BTA) and currently required by the Active Transportation Program (ATP)
for an active transportation plan. The ATP provides funding for the
implementation of bicycle programs and infrastructure.
Existing Bicycle Safety Education and
Outreach Programs
There are currently no ongoing or bicycle safety or education programs
in Downey, though several recent safety and education activities have
taken place at the following events:
• National Night Out Bicycle Safety Workshop: August 6, 2013 at
Downey Civic Center
• Need to Know Bicycle Safety Education Course: August 24, 2013
at Barbara J. Riley Community & Senior Center (sponsored by
Metro)
• Safe Moves City Traffic Safety Rodeo Course: June 14, 2014 at
Downey Civic Center during Tour de Downey
• Downey Kids Bike Festival: June 29, 2014 at Griffiths Middle
School
Recommended Support Programs
Education programs help to inform residents – both those who ride
a bike and those who do not – about the rights, responsibilities, and
resources available for cyclists. Education programs can be ongoing,
in partnership with schools or the police department, or they can
be one-time events in advance of bicycle infrastructure installation.
Encouragement programs are similar to education programs, but focus
more on addressing individual barriers to bicycling and encouraging
people to try bicycle riding as a mode of transportation or recreationally.
Enforcement tools involve efforts by the police department, and have
been demonstrated to be very effective in improving safety for road
users. However, some programs can require a significant investment
of staff time from local police departments or city agencies. Evaluation
efforts can demonstrate the value of investing in bicycle infrastructure
and programming.
Table 5-1 summarizes the high-priority programming efforts
recommended for Downey, including relative cost, key personnel,
timeline, and effectiveness. The section following Table 5-1 provides more
details about the full portfolio of possible education, encouragement,
enforcement and evaluation options. High-priority programming efforts
48
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
Table 5-1: Recommended Near-Term / Priority Support Programs for Downey
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
En
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
Program Key Partners and
Stakeholders Timeline
EffectivenessCost
Mo
r
e
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
(P
a
g
e
N
u
m
b
e
r
)
Lo
w
Me
d
i
u
m
Hi
g
h
Lo
w
Me
d
i
u
m
Hi
g
h
✓Staff / Agency Training City Departments Near-Term,
Ongoing ✓✓49
✓Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Committee
City Departments, LACBC,
Community Organizations,
Downey Police Department,
Downey Unified School District
Near-Term,
Ongoing ✓✓51
✓Bicycle Training for OfficersDowney Police Department Near-term,
Ongoing ✓✓53
✓Data Collection and Monitoring LACBC, Universities, City
Departments
Near-Term,
Ongoing ✓✓55
49
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
that are summarized in Table 5-1 are marked with an asterisk in the full
menu of education, encouragement, and evaluation programs.
Education Programs
Staff / Agency Training*
Provide city staff and enforcement staff with training on new bicycle
design treatments in right of way.
Citywide Bicycling Maps
Attractive maps with bicycle routes, both in print and on city websites, can
serve as an educational tool. These maps should highlight convenient
routes for bicycling in Downey and include tips on safe walking and
bicycling practices. Maps should be distributed at public facilities
throughout the City, through the Downey Bicycle Coalition, and at local
bicycle shops.
Web Presence
Via a website dedicated to bicycle projects in Downey, city staff can
provide overviews and updates on implementation of major projects
and their related goals, design features, schedule of approval, design
and construction, impacts to neighborhood, etc. The Downey Bicycle
Plan project website can be expanded into a permanent repository
for bicycle information, hosted within the City’s web domain, similar
to the successful Los Angeles Department of Transportation Bicycle
Services website (http://www.bicyclela.org) and LADOT Bike Blog (http://
ladotbikeblog.wordpress.com). In addition to maintaining a website, city
staff can increase presence on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flickr, and
other social media platforms as a way of communicating news, educating
residents, and soliciting feedback and public input about future projects.
Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
This category refers to a variety of children’s programs aimed at
promoting walking and bicycling to school and improving traffic safety
around schools. The program takes a comprehensive “5 E” approach
with specific engineering, education, encouragement, enforcement,
and evaluation. The programs involve partnerships among school
staff, parents, students, city staff, school districts, neighbors, and law
enforcement. The National Center for Safe Routes to School has in-
depth programming information. Integrating educational messages into a
comprehensive SRTS program can be a very effective way to kick-start a
citywide program. Specific education tools include:
• Pedestrian skills training for 1st and 3rd graders
• Bicycle skills training for 3rd and 5th graders
• Messaging to parents about safe driving, walking and bicycling
habits
• Creating drop-off and pick-up procedures
• Incorporating information about walking and bicycling into
classroom subjects such as math or science (e.g., calculate
average walking speeds or distances)
• Assemblies or classroom sessions about safety
Teen Bicycle Education
Teens benefit from different educational messages than adults or
children. Many teens also already take drivers’ education, health
education, or other courses where bicycling curricula could be easily
integrated. The City should work with local teen-organizations or schools
to facilitate a participatory process whereby teens create educational
messages. Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) is an effective
way to assist youth to create visuals, videos, or campaigns for bicycle
and pedestrian safety among their peers. The California Department of
Public Health has guides on YPAR and youth-led projects.
50
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
Adult Bicycle Safety Classes
City can host and promote bicycle safety classes
and look for opportunities to partner with local
bicycle advocacy groups for group bike rides. It is
often beneficial for agency staff to attend these classes, particularly
the bicycle safety classes as they cover elements of bicycle safety and
vehicle code compliance that are often unknown to or misunderstood by
transportation professionals and law enforcement officers. The League
of American Bicyclists’ course on safe urban bicycling skills, for example,
could be offered in coordination with the Downey Bicycle Coalition, the
City of Downey, and League of American Bicyclists.
Bicycle Signage
Additional signage directed at bicyclists can help riders understand
how to use new bicycle infrastructure. For example, signs can instruct
bicyclists to look for the bicycle detector symbol and stop their bicycle
on it in order to trigger the bicycle detection the traffic signal. Each sign
typically costs $200 plus installation, and should be designed so that it is
understandable even if the bicyclist does not read, using primarily icons
and symbols rather than words.
Billboards/Electronic Message Boards
Billboards and electronic message boards promote safety in the
community, inform the public about bicycling safety programs, and
provide feedback on the program’s effects. Messages can focus on
safety and/or explain new design treatments in the public right-of-
way. They can be changed regularly and the boards can be moved to
maximize their impact. Signs can also be displayed on bus shelters.
Public Service Announcements
Radio and television public service announcements (PSAs) can provide
accurate and current information to the public. PSAs are valuable as they
are versatile and can reach a large audience on walking and bicycling
issues, education, and announcements. The National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) has a PSA available online (http://www.
nhtsa.gov/parents/parents-bike.html), along with the Safe Kids Coalition
and California Office of Traffic Safety. Downey can incorporate its own
logos and slogans into these PSAs, or develop new ones specific to the
conditions in Downey. One challenge is that PSAs can be costly and
may not reach the intended audience. A lower-cost alternative is to air
PSAs only on public access channels; however, this low-cost approach
may not be as effective as using a public relations firm and purchasing
advertising time targeted to a specific audience.
Videos
Videos can be shown before Council Meetings and uploaded to
YouTube to promote bicycle projects and explain new design concepts
for Downey’s streets.
Flyers, Postcards, Brochures and Pamphlets
These print materials can be distributed to residents and businesses
along the major streets impacted by new bicycle infrastructure projects,
and made available at public buildings, public meetings, and other
major activity centers. They can also be printed as an ongoing effort
to disseminate bicycle safety messaging, including topics such as how
to ride a bicycle safely in traffic, how traffic signals work for bicyclists
and the best way to be detected at signalized intersections, bicyclists’
rights and responsibilities when sharing the road, and motorists’ rights
and responsibilities when sharing the road. These materials should be
provided in multiple languages and can be distributed at locations with
high volumes of bicyclists and through the same outlets as citywide
bicycle maps. Examples are available through advocacy organizations,
the Federal Highway Administration (http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/
ped_bike_order), AAA (http://www.aaafoundation.org/products), and the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (http://www.nhtsa.gov/
bicycles).
51
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Kids’ Bicycling Guide
Printed material targeted at children can help young bicyclists learn the
rules of the bicycling at an early age. Typical topics covered include
riding on the sidewalk safely, transitioning to riding on the street,
wearing a helmet, signaling turns, and selecting the right sized bicycle.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has many
options for printed and online material aimed at teaching kids to ride
bikes safely (www.nhtsa.gov/bicycles).
Partnership with Local Bicycle Shops
Local bicycle shops are often be happy to partner with cities for events
like bicycling training and bicycle repair classes. These are excellent
tools to increase community knowledge of bicycle maintenance issues
and street riding skills. Youth training classes can include a “build-a-
bike” program, in which youth learn how to rebuild a used bicycle that
they may keep at the end of the program. Such classes are most helpful
for beginner to intermediate bicyclists who would like to improve their
understanding of bicycle maintenance and street riding skills. Bicycle
shops are also a natural outlet for distributing walking and cycling
pamphlets, maps, and other informational materials to the community.
These stores are ideal locations to post notices about bicycle/pedestrian
meetings, safety workshops, and events. Bicycle shops also offer
knowledgeable personnel and/or sponsorship for future cycling events
and workshops.
Safety Device Giveaway
At special events, the City of Downey can provide community members
with safety equipment such as bicycle bells, bike helmets, bike lights,
and walking/jogging reflectors. These giveaways help draw attention to
safe cycling throughout the city.
Encouragement Programs
Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee*
Establish a standing Downey Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
(BPAC) that meets regularly with City staff to discuss walking and bicycling
issues. The role of the BPAC includes identifying key problems, crafting
public outreach campaigns, promoting bicycle and pedestrian programs,
and serving as an interface between the City and community members/
advocacy organizations. BPAC members may include:
• Local bicycle and pedestrian advocates, including members of the
Downey Bicycle Coalition
• Downey Unified School District students and staff
• City Public Works Department staff
• City Community Development Department staff
• City Parks and Recreation Department staff
• Law enforcement and fire department officers
• Neighborhood business owners
• Hospital and public health staff
Bike-Friendly Business Districts
Establish a Bike-Friendly Business District (BFBD) in Downtown Downey.
Long Beach began the first BFBD program in 2010. The program
encourages merchants and their customers to replace cars with bicycles.
The City works with local business owners in certain retail districts,
such as Downtown Downey, to offer incentives including discounts for
bicyclists, free bike valet, free bike tune-ups, bicycle parking, and special
stickers. This creates an incentive to travel by bicycle and benefits
merchants, who often see an increase in customers.
52
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
Open Streets Program/Event
Support regional events such as CicLAvia and explore
opportunities to host an open streets event. These
events are good opportunities not only to encourage
bicycling, but to distribute educational materials, and to engage with the
public about future bicycle facilities.
Bike to Work Day / Month
City should continue to promote and participate in Bike to Work Day/
Month, a regional event sponsored by Metro during the month of May.
This is a good opportunity to give away safety equipment, raise the
visibility of cycling in the City, and partner with local community groups
and businesses to create a bike advocacy community.
Bike Valet
Downey should work with the Downey Bicycle Coalition to sponsor bike
valet at community events with high visibility in the City. This encourages
people to ride a bicycle to an event they might have otherwise driven to,
without concern about finding secure parking for their bicycle.
Pop-up Neighborhood Event
During the design development phase of bicycle infrastructure, Downey
can host a “pop-up” event with temporary in-street installations at the site
of approved improvements. These events allow community members
to try out, touch, and see the potential improvements in their future
location. The in-the field event helps residents understand the benefits of
sometimes unusual or untraditional neighborhood greenway treatments,
such as traffic diverters, pavement markings and signage, etc.
Rideshare Week
City should promote and participate in Rideshare Week, a regional event
sponsored by Metro in the month of October. This is a good opportunity
to distribute bike maps and work with local businesses to sponsor bike
commuting competitions with prizes.
Establish Repair, Air, and Bike Maintenance Sites
These sites can be located at high volume end-of-trip locations, built into
a bicycle corral, or sponsored by bike shops or other local businesses.
They allow individuals to refill tires, tighten components, and make
adjustments on the go.
Bike-Buddy Program
Establish a “bike-buddy” program in conjunction with the Downey
Bicycle Coalition and employers. This program would pair experienced
cyclists with new cyclists to bicycle to work together. The City could hold
skills training workshops prior to the program’s kick-off to teach bicycling
safety skills to all participants.
Bike Trains
Establish Bicycle Trains to and from schools in Downey. Bicycle trains
are organized bicycling groups where adults “pick up” bicyclists along
a specific routes to school at specific locations. This way, children are
supervised during their travel to school.
Biking or Walking Mascot
Bellevue, WA launched a walking mascot campaign at their elementary
school in conjunction with roadway improvements. The mascot, called
PedBee, is on school safety signs and makes personal appearances
at school safety days. Safety days include local staff from the City’s
Transportation and Police Departments. Children are taught bicycling,
walking, and traffic safety basics, such as crossing the street safely.
Children are also given traffic safety workbooks that provide guidance
with hands-on activities such as coloring and safety procedure quizzes.
Corner Captains
The Corner Captain program is effective in neighborhoods where lack of
adult supervision is a barrier for children to bicycle to school. Neighbors
or parents agree to stand at a corner of a route to school during the start
53
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
or end of the school day to supervise kids as they bike or walk to or from
school. With clear sight lines, students will be seen the entire length of
the block. Corner captains should wear reflective vests.
Individualized Marketing
Programs like SmartTrips, developed in Portland, Oregon, encourage
bicycling (and walking, carpooling and transit) through hand-delivered
information packets with personalized route selections and suggested
organized activities that get people out in their neighborhoods or places
of employment to shop, work, and discover how many trips they can
easily, conveniently, and safely make without using a car.
National Night Out
The city can distribute bicycle and pedestrian safety education materials
and/or equipment at the neighborhood block parties during National
Night Out, typically held in the month of August.
Neighborhood Pace Vehicle
Residents can set the pace on streets in their neighborhood by driving no
faster than the posted speed limit. On streets with only one lane in each
direction, this will effectively force other motorists to drive slower. Many
communities distribute stickers that say “Neighborhood Pace Car - Drive
the Speed Limit,” which residents can place on their rear windshield.
Enforcement Efforts
Bicycle Training for Officers / Bicycle Liaison Officer*
Law enforcement officers should receive training specifically focused
on bicycle and pedestrian safety and enforcement principles. As a cost-
saving measure, the City of Downey may collaborate with surrounding
jurisdictions and share resources as practical. Additionally, the Downey
Police Department should consider appointing a bicycle and pedestrian
liaison officer who is a single point of contact for all matters concerning
bicyclist and pedestrian safety.
Increased Fines
An increase in traffic fines has been shown to discourage driver violations
against bicyclists. Variations on this include double fines in school zones
and construction zones.
Police Bicycle Patrol
A police patrol conducted by bicycle helps to bring awareness and
attention to the safety issues related to bicycling within Downey. It also
can improve the relationship between police officers and community
members, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Areas with high bicycling and
pedestrian activity should be considered first for police bicycle patrols,
such as Downtown Downey.
Speed Enforcement in School Zones
Strict enforcement of speed laws in school zones can improve the safety
for children bicycling and walking to school. A ‘zero tolerance’ policy for
speeders in school zones, and an increase in fines for drivers who violate
the posted school zone speed limit, are both potential approaches.
Speed Trailers and Active Speed Monitors
Speed trailers and active speed monitors display the speed of oncoming
vehicles. Speed trailers are portable, whereas speed monitors are
installed at permanent locations. Both devices help officers track motorist
speed, display current speed to motorists, and create awareness of the
posted speed limit. Devices should be placed at known locations with
reported speeding, and should be used in conjunction with random
ticketing operations.
Neighborhood Speed Watch/Radar Lending Program
If speeding is a problem, law enforcement officers can lend speed radar
guns to students or residents to check speeds of passing vehicles. The
student or resident records the license plate number of any speeding
vehicles, and law enforcement will send a speeding notice warning to
54
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
the motorist. A group of organized neighbors can also
commit to periodically monitoring streets for speeding
vehicles.
Tattletale Lights
To help law enforcement officers catch red-light runners safely and
more effectively, a “rat box” is wired into the backside of a traffic signal
controller and allows enforcement officers stationed downstream to
identify, pursue, and cite red-light runners. Warning signs may be set up
along with the box to warn drivers about the fine for red-light violations.
Rat boxes are a low-cost initiative (approximately $100 to install the box),
but do require police officers for enforcement.
Traffic Complaint Hotline
Downey residents can report non-emergency traffic violations to law
enforcement if there is an established traffic complaint hotline. Officers
can target problem areas more effectively with records of traffic
complaints. This also allows the community to engage efficiently with
officers.
Bicycle Traffic School / Citation Diversion Program
With this program, bicyclists or motorists who are ticketed for unsafe
bicycling or unsafe driving around bicyclists, respectively, attend a class
about safe and lawful behavior while riding a bicycle or sharing the road
as a motorist with bicyclists. The class is offered in lieu of paying a fine
or appearing in court. Bicycle traffic school is often accompanied by a
media campaign informing road users of the program. Citations can be
focused on common or uniquely hazardous behaviors such as unsafe
passing of bicyclists by motorists or wrong way riding by bicyclists.
Wrong Way Riding Signs
Signs can inform bicyclists they are riding in the wrong direction for each
side of the street. The California MUTCD provides guidance on wrong
way signs that can be mounted on the back side of existing sign posts
on streets with bike lanes to maximize their visibility to bicyclists traveling
in the wrong direction. Local law enforcement should also provide
enforcement by educating and/or citing cyclists who are riding in the
opposite direction of traffic, as this is a common cause of collisions.
Traffic Safety Grants
Several grant sources exist specifically for traffic safety related efforts.
Downey Police Department can pursue Office of Traffic Safety grants
for outreach campaigns to support the normal time budgeted for police
officer duties.
Bicycle Education and Registration (BEAR) Program
Coordinate with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and the
Sheriff’s Youth Foundation to implement appropriate elements from their
existing Bicycle Education and Registration (BEAR) suite of programs.
Bridging the gap between the sheriff as more than an enforcer, but an ally
and resource to bicyclists is important for a safe community. Programs
include bicycle-related safety, education and enforcement programs
including:
• Adult/Teen education classes (The BEAR Essentials)
• Youth bicycle maintenance and safety + free bikes and helmets
(The Bear Cub Class)
• Enforcement of the rules of the road
• Proactive bike theft stings using bait bikes, tracking devices and a
bike theft “tip line”
• Regular dissemination of statistics to track issues over time
55
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Targeted Enforcement Efforts
Targeted enforcement efforts draw attention to specific issues, such as
crosswalk violations, speeding, or driving under the influence, which
can endanger bicyclists and pedestrians. These efforts often include
both citations and educational materials that focus on safe and lawful
behavior for all road users. Enforcement can be targeted at areas such
as schools, public facilities, and locations with demonstrated collision
history.
Sidewalk Riding Prohibition
Sidewalk riding can be dangerous for pedestrians, particularly in areas
of high activity such as Downtown Downey. In conjunction with on-street
bicycle improvements such as bicycle lanes and bicycle routes, consider
prohibiting sidewalk bicycle riding in high pedestrian areas, including
signage to inform bicycle riders that riding in the bike lane is safer for
everyone.
Evaluation
Data Collection and Monitoring*
Partner with Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition and sister chapter
Downey Bicycle Coalition to conduct annual bicycle and pedestrian
counts and an annual monitoring program that reviews and compares
these counts. Additionally, Downey can require that all traffic study
counts include bicycles and pedestrians to estimate bicycling levels and
changes in bicycling levels over time.
Bike/Walk Audits
Conduct bicycle and walking audits as part of outreach strategies for
new development projects or as a comprehensive SRTS program. A
bike/walk audit leads stakeholders on a set course to discuss bicyclist/
pedestrian safety concerns and strategies to improve safety.
Performance Measurement and Metrics
Develop metrics to measure the impact of walking and bicycling on
public health, resident and merchant perceptions, environmental impact,
amount of cycling, and safety (note: it may not be possible to measure
the impact of bicycling alone). Some examples are provided below:
• Public Health – Partner with local schools to measure distance
cycled or calories/weight lost during Bike Month (May)
• Resident and Merchant Perceptions – Survey questions such
as “how frequently do you walk or bicycle around town?” “what
prevents you from walking and bicycling?” and “what mode of
travel do you use for short trips?” aim to understand attitudes
toward walking and bicycling, and common concerns. These
surveys, which should be available in English and Spanish, can be
done citywide or as part of an SRTS program for parents.
• Environmental Impact – Measure reductions in vehicle miles
traveled or vehicle emissions through surveys
• Amount of Cycling and Walking – Partner with Downey Bicycle
Coalition and require bicycle and pedestrian counts with traffic
studies so that changes in levels of cycling can be measured over
time.
• Safety – Review the number of bicycle/pedestrian-involved
collisions on a regular basis and develop collision rates as data
on the number of vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians is collected
over time.
56
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
6 6. BICYCLE MASTER PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION
Project Prioritization and
Implementation Matrix
Table 6-1 sorts all bicycle facilities projects included in this
Bicycle Master Plan into timeframes for implementation, provides a
planning-level cost estimate, and identifies potential funding sources
based on the feasibility and type of project. Projects that are identified
as part of the Metro Call for Projects (Winter 2015) have been included
in a grant application, submitted to Metro on January 31, 2015. These
projects include the top-priority Class II bicycle lanes and associated
wayfinding signage and bicycle parking. Phase I: Near-Term Projects
(2019) in Table 6-1 lists additional projects that are eligible for funding
under the California Active Transportation Program.
Table 6-2 identifies milestones in the overall process of improving
bicycling in the City of Downey. These milestones are assigned to
specific responsible City entities, and are suggested along a near-term
timeline.
Concept Graphics and Cross-Sections
In order to help visualize what the proposed bicycle facilities would
look like, this section includes representative examples of before and
after cross-sections, photo simulations, and concept plans for several
illustrative projects. These graphics are also included in Project Sheets
developed for the 2015 Metro Call for Projects, which can be viewed in
Appendix B.
Figures 6-1, 6-2, and 6-3 show three typical street cross-sections in
Downey, as they exist today and as they would exist after construction of
the proposed facilities.
Figures 6-4 and 6-5 show Downey Avenue in Downtown Downey
before implementation of any bicycle facilities, and a photo-simulation
after implementation of treatments including bicycle route markings,
wayfinding signs, and bicycle racks.
Figures 6-6 and 6-7 show Old River School Road as it currently exists,
and a photo-simulation after implementation of a proposed road diet,
including bicycle lanes and wayfinding signs.
Figures 6-8 and 6-9 show concept plans for two sites in Downtown
Downey. These graphics give a sense of how the facilities would
transition from bicycle lanes or bicycle routes through the intersection.
Figure 6-10 shows the concept plan for Old River School Road,
illustrating how the bicycle lanes and road diet would transition through
the intersection.
57
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Table 6-1: Project Prioritization Matrix
Project
#Location From (N/W)To (S/E)
Distance
(Miles)
Facility
Type
Planning Level
Cost Estimate
Adjacent Cities
InvolvedPotential Funding SourceTarget Cycle
Phase I: Near-Term Projects (2019)
1 Guatemala Ave Bangle Rd (I-5)Gainford St 1.13Class III$33,900 Pico Rivera ATP Cycle III 2016
2Gainford St / Tecum RdGuatemala AveFlorence Ave0.27Class III$8,100 - ATP Cycle III 2016
3Old School River Rd Florence AveImperial Hwy2.39Class II/III$119,500 South Gate Metro Call for ProjectsWinter 2015
4Tweedy Ln Bangle Rd (I-5)Florence Ave1.07Class III$32,100 - ATP Cycle III 2016
5Rives Ave Florence AveImperial Hwy2.39Class III$71,700 - ATP Cycle III 2016
6 Downey Ave Gallatin Rd5th St 1.23Class II$61,500 - Metro Call for ProjectsWinter 2015
7Downey Ave 5th St Firestone Blvd 0.3 Class III$9,000 - ATP Cycle III 2016
8Downey Ave Firestone BlvdGardendale St2.04Class II$102,000 Paramount Metro Call for ProjectsWinter 2015
9Brookshire Ave Gallatin RdCherokee Dr0.86Class III$25,800 - ATP Cycle III 2016
10Brookshire Ave Cherokee DrGardendale St2.63Class II/III$131,500 - Metro Call for ProjectsWinter 2015
11Patton Rd / Birchdale AveFirestone BlvdMeadow Rd 1.42Class III$42,600 - ATP Cycle III 2016
12Hanwell Ave Adoree St
Gardendale St /
Foster Rd 0.34Class III$10,200 Bellflower ATP Cycle III 2016
13Columbia Way Lakewood BlvdFoster Rd 0.82Class II$41,000 Bellflower Metro Call for ProjectsWinter 2015
14Passons Blvd Telegraph RdI-5 Overpass0.25Class III$7,500 Pico Rivera ATP Cycle III 2016
15Lemoran Ave / Haledon AveI-5 OverpassFlorence Ave 0.74 Class III$22,200 - ATP Cycle III 2016
16Woodruff Ave Florence AveFirestone Blvd0.91Class III$27,300 - ATP Cycle III 2016
17Woodruff Ave Firestone BlvdFoster Rd 1.53Class II$76,500 Bellflower Metro Call for ProjectsWinter 2015
18Gallatin Rd Tweedy LnLakewood Blvd0.92Class II$46,000 - Metro Call for ProjectsWinter 2015
19Gallatin Rd Lakewood BlvdI-5 Freeway 0.97Class III$29,100 - ATP Cycle III 2016
20Suva St Scout AveParamount Blvd0.85Class III$25,500 Bell Gardens ATP Cycle III 2016
21Dinwiddie St Rio Hondo DrOld River School Rd0.56Class III$16,800 - ATP Cycle III 2016
224th St / Fostoria St Old River School RdParamount Blvd 0.71 Class III$21,300 - ATP Cycle III 2016
235th St / Cecilia St Paramount BlvdPico Vista Rd1.89Class III$56,700 - ATP Cycle III 2016
24Stewart and Gray Rd Karmont AveFirestone Blvd3.18Class III$95,400 South Gate Metro Call for ProjectsWinter 2015
25Alameda St Paramount BlvdLakewood Blvd0.96Class III$28,800 - ATP Cycle III 2016
26Washburn Rd Bellflower BlvdRegentview Ave 0.76 Class III$22,800 - ATP Cycle III 2016
27Quill Dr Los Padrinos DrParamount Blvd0.91Class III$27,300 - ATP Cycle III 2016
28
Donovan St / Rose Ave / James
St Brookshire AveColumbia Way0.57Class III$17,100 - ATP Cycle III 2016
58
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
6
Table 6-1 (Continued): Project Prioritization Matrix
Project
#LocationFrom (N/W)To (S/E)
Distance
(Miles)
Facility
Type
Planning Level
Cost Estimate
Adjacent Cities
InvolvedPotential Funding SourceTarget Cycle
Phase I: Near-Term Projects (2019)
29
Congressman Steve
Horn WayColumbia WayBellflower Blvd0.54Class III$16,200 - ATP Cycle III 2016
30Adoree StLakewood BlvdColumbia Way0.33Class III$9,900 - ATP Cycle III 2016
31
Blodgett Ave /
Priscilla StGardendale StLakewood Blvd 0.13 Class III$3,900 - ATP Cycle III 2016
32
Gardendale St/
Foster Rd Hollydale ParkSan Gabriel River3.93Class II$196,500 Paramount Metro Call for ProjectsWinter 2015
33Wayfinding Signage---- - Metro Call for ProjectsWinter 2015
34
Bicycle Parking /
End-of-Trip Facilities---- - Metro Call for ProjectsWinter 2015
Project
#Location From (N/W)To (S/E)
Distance
(Miles)Facility Type
Planning Level
Cost Estimate
Adjacent Cities
Involved Potential Funding SourceTarget Cycle
Phase II: Mid-Term Projects (2024)
35Florence AveRio Hondo Bike Path Old River School Rd0.21
Enhanced
Class III$10,500 Bell Gardens
Future funding cycle to be identified
within mid-term timeframe2024
36Florence AveRives Ave Tweedy Ln 0.17
Enhanced
Class III$8,500 - Future funding cycle to be identified
within mid-term timeframe2024
37Florence AveHaledon Ave Woodruff Ave 0.21
Enhanced
Class III$10,500 - Future funding cycle to be identified
within mid-term timeframe2024
38Paramount Blvd5th St 4th St 0.04
Enhanced
Class III$2,000 - Future funding cycle to be identified
within mid-term timeframe2024
39Firestone BlvdWoodruff Ave (N)Woodruff Ave (S)0.08
Enhanced
Class III$4,000 - Future funding cycle to be identified
within mid-term timeframe2024
40Paramount BlvdAlameda St Quill Dr 0.29
Enhanced
Class III$14,500 - Future funding cycle to be identified
within mid-term timeframe2024
41Lakewood BlvdAlameda St Columbia Way 0.15
Enhanced
Class III$7,500 - Future funding cycle to be identified
within mid-term timeframe2024
42Lakewood BlvdAdoree St Priscilla St 0.14
Enhanced
Class III$7,000 - Future funding cycle to be identified
within mid-term timeframe2024
43Bellflower Blvd
Congressman Steve Horn
Way Washburn Rd 0.24
Enhanced
Class III$12,000 - Future funding cycle to be identified
within mid-term timeframe2024
Long-Term Projects: Moderate Priority (2029)
44Pico Vista RdSan Gabriel River --Bridge$1,500,000 Norwalk
Future funding cycle to be identified
within long-term timeframe2029
45Downey Norwalk RdSan Gabriel River --Bridge$1,500,000 Norwalk
Future funding cycle to be identified
within long-term timeframe2029
59
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Table 6-2: Bicycle Master Plan Implementation Matrix
Milestone Responsible Party Target DateStatus
Amend Municipal Code to reflect bicycle prioritiesCity Council June 2014 Complete
Initiate Bicycle Master Plan process City Council, Department of Public WorksSummer, 2014Complete
Apply for Metro Call for Projects grant Department of Public Works January 2015Complete
Adopt Bicycle Master Plan City Council July 2015 In Progress
Install bicycle parking Department of Public Works Ongoing In Progress
Investigate opportunities along rail right-of-way
along Burns Avenue and future Eco-Rapid Line Department of Public Works 2015 In Progress
Adopt Complete Streets policy Department of Public Works, Department of
Community Development - Planning Division 2015 In Progress
Implement bicycle facilities outlined in Bicycle
Master Plan Department of Public Works Ongoing In Progress
60
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
6
Old River School Road
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
Old River School Rd - North of Stewart and Gray Rd
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
EXISTING (60’)
6’
BikeLane
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
6’
BikeLane
10’
Turn Lane
PROPOSED (60’)
Brookshire Ave - North of 5th St
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
EXISTING (56’)
5’
BikeLane
5’
BikeLane
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
10’
Turn Lane
Downtown Downey
5th St
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
PROPOSED (56’)
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
EXISTING (38’)
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
PROPOSED (38’)
Downey Ave - Between
5th St and Firestone Blvd
Angled Parking/Bulb-Out
EXISTING (22’)
Angled Parking/Bulb-Out
PROPOSED (22’)
Woodruff Ave
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
EXISTING (80’)
6’
BikeLane
6’
BikeLane
12’
Auto
14’
Auto
11’
Auto
10’
Auto
12’
Auto
14’
Auto
11’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Turn Lane
12’
Turn Lane
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
PROPOSED (80’)
Figure 6-1: Road Diet Cross-Section (i.e. Old River School Road)
Figure 6-2: Bicycle Route Cross-Section (i.e. Rives Avenue)
Figure 6-3: Bicycle Lane Cross-Section (i.e. Woodruff Avenue)
61
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Figure 6-4: Downey Avenue, Downtown Downey, Before
Figure 6-5: Downey Avenue, Downtown Downey, After
(Photo Simulation)
Figure 6-6: Old River School Road, Before
Figure 6-7: Old River School Road, After (Photo Simulation)
62
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
6
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
5th
S
t
Bicycle wayfinding
Wayfinding Protocol
Wayfinding signs are a critical component in the implementation of a
bicycle plan, because they make the bicycle network system intelligible
to riders. In addition to assisting bicyclists in navigating the City safely via
new bicycle facilities, wayfinding signs make bicyclists more visible to
other road users by legitimizing and normalizing bicycle riding as part of
the multi-modal transportation system.
Figure 6-11 shows recommended locations for wayfinding signs within the
City of Downey. Each location can be categorized into Tier 1, 2, or 3, with
associated spacing and frequency standards as described in Appendix
C, Best Practices in Developing and Implementing Bicycle Wayfinding
Signage. Figure 6-12 shows four wayfinding sign designs, which comply
with branding and design standards for the City of Downey.
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
New
S
t
La Villa
S
t
5th
S
t
BikeCorral
Bike Route
Bike Route
Bike Parking
Bike Lanes
Bicycle wayfinding
Figure 6-8: Concept Plan, 5th Street and Brookshire Avenue
Figure 6-9: Concept Plan, 5th Street and Downey Avenue
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Bicycle wayfinding
Figure 6-10: Concept Plan, Old RIver School Road and
Stewart & Gray Road
63
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
§¨¦5
§¨¦605
§¨¦105
Norwalk
Pico Rivera
South
Gate
Bell
Commerce
Bellflower
Lynwood
Santa Fe
Springs
Paramount
Bell Gardens
Cudahy
Rive
s
A
v
e
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Suv
a
S
t
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
d
Gar
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
5th
S
t
Imp
e
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
T
e
l
e
g
r
a
p
h
R
d
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Stewart and Gray Rd
Be
l
l
f
l
o
w
e
r
B
l
v
d
Imperial Hwy
Foster Rd
D
o
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Par
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
Pat
t
o
n
R
d
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
W
a
y
Ala
m
e
d
a
S
t
Twe
e
d
y
L
n
Firestone
B
l
v
d
Woo
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
2
49
28
8
3
29 16
9
4
17
30
5
31
18
6
32
19
20
33
21
34
22
35
23
36
24
37
25
38
26
39
40
41
42
43 44
45
4647
1
11
12
748
27
14
15
13
10
Civic FacilitiesDowney City HallDowney LibraryDowney Police DepartmentColumbia Memorial Space Science Learning Center Barbara J. Riley Community & Senior CenterDowney Civic Theatre
Commercial CentersDowntown DowneyDowney LandingStonewood Center
Hospitals & Medical FacilitiesKaiser Permanente PIH Health
LandmarksBob's Big Boy (Historic Johnie's Broiler)Historic McDonalds
ParksApollo ParkCrawford ParkDennis the Menace ParkFurman ParkGolden ParkIndependence ParkRio San Gabriel ParkTemple ParkTreasure Island Park Wilderness ParkDiscovery Sports ParkRio Hondo Golf ClubDowney Community Aquatic Center
SchoolsAlameda Elementary SchoolCarpenter Elementary SchoolGallatin Elementary SchoolGauldin Elementary SchoolImperial Elementary SchoolLewis Elementary SchoolOld River Elementary SchoolPrice Elementary SchoolRio Hondo Elementary SchoolRio San Gabriel Elementary SchoolUnsworth Elementary SchoolWard Elementary SchoolWilliams Elementary SchoolDoty Middle SchoolGriffiths Middle SchoolSussman Middle SchoolStauffer Middle SchoolDowney High School Warren High School Columbus High School Downey Adult School
Transportation FacilitiesDowney Bus DepotMetro Lakewood Green Line Station
Regional Bike Routes
Adjacent Cities
123456
789
1011
1213
14151617181920212223242526
272829303132333435363738394041424344454647
4849
City
Wayfinding Destinations
Bicycle Wayfinding Destinations
N Planned Bikeways
Metro Green Line
Existing Bikeways
Under/Overpass
Legend
Figure 6-11: Recommended Wayfinding Locations
64
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
6 Additional Funding Sources
The majority of public funds for bicycle and pedestrian
projects are derived from a core group of federal, state,
and local programs. Federal funds from the Surface
Transportation Program (STP), Transportation Enhancements
(TE), and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) programs
are allocated to the County and distributed accordingly.
State Funding Sources
Active Transportation Program
The California Transportation Commission developed program
guidelines and project selection criteria for the first call for projects for
the statewide Active Transportation Program (ATP) in March 2014. The
Active Transportation Program consolidated and replaced the former
Transportation Alternatives Program, Safe Routes to School Program,
and Bicycle Transportation Account. The second cycle of the ATP was
held in Spring, 2015. A third cycle of the ATP is anticipated in 2016.
Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program (EEMP)
The Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program (EEMP)
was established in 1989 and is administered by the California Natural
Resources Agency and Caltrans. The program offers a total of $7 million
each year for grants to local, state, and federal governmental agencies
and to nonprofit organizations, funded through gasoline taxes. EEMP
Funds are allocated to projects that either directly or indirectly offset
environmental impacts of modified or new public transportation facilities
including streets, mass transit guideways, park-n-ride facilities, transit
stations, tree planting to offset the effects of vehicular emissions, and
the acquisition or development of roadside recreational facilities, such as
trails. resources.ca.gov/eem/
MUTCD
Lakewood Bl 2mi
Downey HS 3mi
Brookshire Av Brookshire Av
Lakewood Bl
Downey HS
Golden Park
Lakewood Bl 2mi
3mi
4mi
Brookshire Av
Confirmation Sign Turn Sign Decision Sign
DOWNEYTHEME 1
BIKE ROUTE
CityofDowney
Lakewood Bl 2mi
Downey HS 3mi
Brookshire Av
BIKE ROUTE
CityofDowney
Brookshire Av
Lakewood Bl
Downey HS
Golden Park
Lakewood Bl 2mi
3mi
4mi
BIKE ROUTE
CityofDowney
Brookshire Av
DOWNEYTHEME 3
BIKE ROUTE
CityofDowney
Brookshire Av
2miLakewood Bl
BIKE ROUTE
CityofDowney
Brookshire Av
3mi
2mi
Downey HS
Lakewood Bl
4miGolden Park
BIKE ROUTE
CityofDowney
Brookshire Av
3mi
2mi
Downey HS
Lakewood Bl
DOWNEYTHEME 2
BIKE ROUTE
CityofDowney
Brookshire Av
2miLakewood Bl
BIKE ROUTE
CityofDowney
Brookshire Av
3mi
2mi
Downey HS
Lakewood Bl
4miGolden Park
BIKE ROUTE
CityofDowney
Brookshire Av
3mi
2mi
Downey HS
Lakewood Bl
Figure 6-12: Wayfinding Sign Design Options
65
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
Recreational Trails Program
The Recreational Trails Program (RTP) provides funds to sates to develop
and maintain recreational trails and trail-related facilities for both non-
motorized and motorized recreational trail uses. The RTP is an assistance
program of the Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA). The RTP funds come from the Federal Highway
Trust Fund, and represent a portion of the motor fuel excise tax collected
from non-highway recreational fuel use. RTP funds are distributed to
each state by legislative formula: half of the funds are distributed equally
among all states, and half are distributed in proportion to the estimated
amount of non-highway recreational fuel use in each State. RTP funds
may be used for maintenance and restoration of existing trails, purchase
and lease of equipment to construct or maintain trails, administrative
costs associated with the program, or operation of educational programs
to promote safety and environmental protection related to trails. www.
fhwa.dot.gov/environment/recreational_trails/index.cfm
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core federal-aid
program that aims to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public
roads. Caltrans administers the program in California and received
$74.5 million for the 2010/11 Federal Fiscal Year. HSIP funds can be used
for projects such as bike lane or sidewalk projects on local roadways,
improvements to Class I multi-use paths, or for traffic calming measures.
Applications that identify a history of incidents and demonstrate their
project’s improvement to safety are most competitive for funding. The
Transportation Development Act can also be used to fund related
improvements; however, these funds are allocated to cities on the basis
of a formula. www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hsip.htm
Hazard Elimination Safety
Administered in California by Caltrans, the federal Hazard Elimination
Safety (HES) program provides funds to eliminate or reduce the number
and severity of traffic collisions on public roads and highways. Cities
and counties compete for HES funds by submitting candidate projects
to Caltrans for review and analysis. Caltrans prioritizes these projects
statewide and approves priority projects for funding through its annual
HES program plan. Historically, only about 20 percent of applications
are approved for funding. In the 2005-2006 program cycle, Caltrans
awarded approximately $16 million under the HES program. www.dot.
ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hesp/hesp.htm
Proposition 84
The Department of Conservation manages competitive grants, on behalf
of the California Strategic Growth Council (SGC), to cities, counties,
and designated regional agencies to promote sustainable community
planning and natural resource conservation. The grant program supports
development, adoption, and implementation of various planning
elements. In 2010, it awarded $20 million through the Proposition 84
Sustainable Communities Planning Grant and Incentives Program. The
SGC will award $20 million more in grants in both 2011 and 2012 (totaling
$40 million). Eligible projects include plans that support greenhouse
gas emission reduction and sustainable communities. www.sgc.ca.gov/
planning_grants.html
Caltrans Transportation Planning Grants
Caltrans provides Transportation Planning Grants on a yearly basis.
These grants are available to jurisdictions focusing on improving mobility
by innovatively addressing problems or deficiencies in the transportation
system. Funds can be used for planning or feasibility studies. The
maximum funding available per project is $300,000. Fiscal year 2012-
2013 grants were awarded to 70 projects totaling almost $10 million.
www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/grants.html
66
City of Downey Bicycle Master Plan
6 OTS Grant Opportunities
The California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) provides grants
for safety programs and equipment. Bicycle and Pedestrian
Safety is a specifically identified funding priority. This category
of grants includes enforcement and education programs,
which encompass a wide range of activities, including bicycle
helmet distribution, design and printing of billboards and
bus posters, other public information materials, development of safety
components as part of physical education curriculum, or police safety
demonstrations through school visitations. In 2009, OTS awarded $82
million to 203 agencies. www.ots.ca.gov/Grants/default.asp
Land and Water Conservation Fund
The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) provides matching grants
to States and local governments for the acquisition and development of
public outdoor recreation areas and facilities. The program is intended to
create and maintain a nationwide legacy of high quality recreation areas
and facilities and to stimulate non-federal investments in the protection
and maintenance of recreation resources. www.nps.gov/ncrc/programs/
lwcf/grants.html
Transportation Development Account Article III
Transportation Development Act was enacted by the California State
Legislature and is administered by Caltrans. Article 3 of the TDA provides
funding for pedestrian and bicycle facilities. By ordinance, Metro is
responsible for administering the program and establishing its policies
in Los Angeles County. TDA, Article 3 funds are allocated annually on a
per capita basis to both cities and the County of Los Angeles. Agencies
must submit a claim form to Metro by the end of the fiscal year in
which they are allocated. TDA Article 3 funds may be used for right-
of-way acquisition, design costs, construction or major reconstruction,
retrofitting to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), route
improvements such as bicycle detectors at signals, and purchase and
installation of supporting bicycle facilities such as parking, lockers, and
showers. www.metro.net/projects/tda/
Safe and Active Communities
The California Department of Public Health Safe and Active
Communities Branch (SACB) has previously solicited applications from
eligible entities to develop, implement, and evaluate a set of small-
scale, low-cost educational interventions with underserved California
schools. Interventions focused on improving safety rather than simply
encouraging walking and bicycling, with the goal of ongoing programing
at local intervention sites, beyond the life of the grant. Presently, there
are no funding opportunities for bicycle safety, but there may be funds
available in the future. www.cdph.ca.gov
Regional and Local Funding Sources
At the regional and county level, SCAG and Metro administer much of
the funds that can be used to implement active transportation projects.
Metro administers several programs that are sources of funding for
recommended projects. As mentioned, federal and state programs,
such as the Transportation Enhancements program, are administered at
the state or county level and distributed to local jurisdictions.
Metro Call for Projects
Metro is responsible for allocating discretionary federal, state, and local
transportation funds to improve all modes of surface transportation. Metro
also prepares the Los Angeles County Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP). The Call for Projects program is a competitive process
that distributes discretionally capital transportation funds to regionally
significant projects. Metro accepts applications for this program every
other year. Funding levels for each mode is established by the Metro
Long Range Transportation Plan. As part of the Bicycle Master Plan
67
JUNE 2015 DRAFT
process, the City of Downey submitted an application during the 2015
Call for Projects cycle for Class II bicycle lanes listed in the prioritization
matrix above, with associated wayfinding signage and bicycle parking.
SCAG Compass Blueprint Program
The Southern California Association of Governments’ Compass Blueprint
Program began identifying Active Transportation as a project funding
category in its 2013-2014 Call for Projects. This grant program is intended
for planning project that integrate transportation and land use planning.
www.compassblueprint.org
Measure R
The Measure R Expenditure Plan devotes its funds to seven
transportation categories as follows: 35% to new rail and bus rapid transit
projects, 3% to Metrolink projects, 2% to Metro Rail system improvement
projects, 20% to carpool lanes, highways and other highway-related
improvements, 5% to rail operations, 20% to bus operations, and 15% for
local city sponsored improvements. Many jurisdictions use their local
Measure R funding for active transportation projects. www.metro.net/
projects/measurer/
Traffic Mitigation Fees
Some agencies have implemented development fees that can then be
used to fund various types of infrastructure. For example, a fee may
be adopted for each PM peak hour trip that is generated by a project.
This funding is combined with funds from other projects to establish a
source of funds to construct the improvements that are on an adopted
project list. Based on the list of projects or other mechanisms, the traffic
mitigation program can be used to fund a variety of projects that serve
several travel modes.
Toll Road Revenue (Los Angeles County)
The Los Angeles County Metro Board of Directors adopted a Toll Road
Revenue Action Plan that targets 40 percent of revenues be invested
in active transportation projects within three miles of the I-110 and I-10
corridors. The policy will help ensure communities, stakeholders, and
all travelers along these corridors to benefit from projects that include
congestion reduction, improved safety and access, transportation
options, and air quality/environmental improvements.
Public Private Partnerships
Increasingly, innovative bicycle projects are being implemented with the
assistance and funding from private entities. One recent, high-profile
example is the sponsorship of New York City’s bicycle sharing program
by Citigroup. Additional examples of local projects include the provision
of shared bicycles at hotels, the construction of shower and changing
facilities in office buildings, and the development of bicycle storage
rooms at new residential development sites. These projects typically do
not occur in the public right-of-way (with the exception of Citi Bike in New
York, which utilizes on-street parking spaces in partnership with the City
for bike sharing kiosks).
APPENDIX A
PUBLIC INPUT AND
SURVEY RESULTS
https://www.facebook.com/bikedowney
Tour De Downey Summary
On Saturday, June 14 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. the Downey Bicycle Mater Plan Study Team participated in
the Tour De Downey event and kicked off the outreach efforts for the Plan. The Study Team staffed a
booth and collected information from over 100 stakeholders (including approximately 50 surveys on the
first day it was available) on what they want to see considered in the City’s Bicycle Master Plan.
Comments were collected in a variety of ways including a needs assessment survey, a board exercise
where participants placed dots on their top three bicycle facilities and parking preferences, and on an
aerial map. The aerial map allowed participants to identify and provide comments on specific areas
within the City that are challenging to get around and/or that provide good opportunities for a bicycle
network.
Event Booth at Tour De Downey
Downey youth take paper Needs Assessment survey
Downey resident takes electronic Needs Assessment survey
Downey youth participates in preference exercise
Downey family takes part in preference exercise
Downey residents take part in aerial map exercise
DOWNEY BICYCLE MASTER PLAN STAKEHOLDER INPUT
TOUR DE DOWNEY - JUNE 14, 2014
Project Name Facility Comments Count
Bellflower Challenging to ride
Needs bike path (47 yr old resident)
Brookshire Needs bike lane to Gardendale/Foster.
Dinwiddie St Better access point to Rio Hondo through park than Florence & Firestone.
Downey Ave Needs bike lane.
Consider cycle track - existing parking restrictions would make the project more
feasible.
Firestone Improve Firestone connection to river
Make river connection safer.
Need to incorporate bike improvements into current construction.
Firestone bridge over SG River is dangerous.
Should add bike path to RxR right of way on Firestone.
Needs bike path.
Want connection between Gardendale/Firestone bike paths.
Florence Need bike path connection to river.5
Make river connection safer.
Favored E/W connection, but could be improved
Wilderness Park Access - crossing Florence is dangerous (narrow, raised sidewalk).
Needs improvement.
Gardendale Good connection, low traffic.
Comfortable with a sharrow.
Needs a river to river bikeway connection.3
Want connection between Gardendale/Firestone bike paths.
Grace Favorite E/W connection, but could be improved
Guatemala Speed humps and slower traffic needed.
Imperial Hwy High traffic volume; need bike lanes.
Need cycle track.
Need bike lane connection to San Gabriel bike path and Rio Hondo bike path.2
Lakewood Blvd Needs bikeway access near retail developments
High vehicle speeds
Challenging to ride
Extend Lakewood bike lanes into Downey.2
Old River School Rd Needs bikeway for schools in area.
Potential location for "Via Libre" type events toward Downtown.
Tricky to bike on.
Paramount Need better connections to Bell Gardens and Paramount.
Need connection to Gardendale/Foster
Needs "green" bike lane.
People drive "like madmen" on Paramount.
Need to continue bike lane north into Downey.
Improve maintenance (street sweeping) on west side of Paramount.
Consider cycle track - existing parking restrictions would make the project more
feasible.
Phlox Need downtown bike access.
Rives Need connection to Florence.
DOWNEY BICYCLE MASTER PLAN STAKEHOLDER INPUT
TOUR DE DOWNEY - JUNE 14, 2014
Stewart & Grey Alameda is a better alternative to S&G.
S&G needs bikeway for schools in area.
Favored E/W connection, but could be improved.
Needs bike lane.2
Suva Need bike path and connection to Rio Hondo.
Telegraph Rd.Need a bike lane
Need access to Rio Hondo
Tour de Downey Need more signs, stickers, medals.
Coordinate events with other cities.
Woodruff Bike lane needed.
Consider cycle track - existing parking restrictions would make project more
feasible.
Need better ped access to/on Woodruff.
105 Need a bike path on the 105 Fwy.
710 Include bike and ped enhancements within the 710/river path expansion.
Also need freeway access improvements.
General/Uncat.Crosswalks dangerous with right turning vehicles.
Need connection from San Gabriel Pk to river.
Need bike lanes downtown.
Need more bike parking.2
Need to improve bike access to parks, better facilities.
Need bikeshare for Green Line stations.
Bike paths need more police presence and maintenance.
Need to educate and create a bicycle culture in Downey.
Example: Closing streets on a specific day for bikes only. (Via Libre)
Pavement improvements needed.
Need better access to river paths from residential neighborhoods.
Bike paths always are better than any lane.
Safety above all may require slower riding and respect.
Need more east-west corridors.2
Need bikeshare in Downey.
Less potholes.
People should only wear one earbud while riding.
Improve bike path placement and striping.
Need more bike lanes in general.
Blvd's not bike friendly.
Bike paths needed through Columbia Park and Promenade.
Need better access to business/commercial areas of Downey via bike.
0
5
10
15
20
25
Preferred Bicycle Facility Type
Red = Female (Adult)Green = Male (Adult)
Blue = Male (Minor)Yellow = Female (Minor)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Inverted - UPost and LoopIn-street Bicycle
Corral
Bicycle LockersArtistic/Branded
Bicycle Rack
Bicycle Transit
Center Parking
Preferred Bicycle Parking Type
Red = Female (Adult)Green = Male (Adult)
Blue = Male (Minor)Yellow = Female (Minor)
Downey Bicycle Master Plan Community Workshop #1
On Saturday, July 12 from 9 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., the Downey Bicycle Mater Plan Team participated in
Community Workshop #1 at the Downey Civic Center to continue its outreach efforts for the Plan. The
Workshop was held in the Downey Civic Center area next to the Downey Farmer’s Market. A project
presentation was made available for participants with opportunities to provide
comments. Approximately 20 participants shared their visions, ideas, and comments on what they want
to see considered in the City’s Bicycle Master Plan. Comments were collected in a variety of ways
including a needs assessment survey, a board exercise where participants placed dots on their top three
bicycle facilities and parking preferences, and on an aerial map. The aerial map allowed participants to
identify and provide comments on specific areas within the City that are challenging to get around
and/or that provide good opportunities for a bicycle network.
Event Booth at Downey Civic Center
Downey participant takes paper Needs Assessment survey as Miguel Núñez explains project
Downey resident takes electronic Needs Assessment survey
Downey residents share feedback, comments and ideas on the Plan
0
0.
5
1
1.
5
2
2.
5
3
3.
5
Pr
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
T
y
p
e
Re
d
=
F
e
m
a
l
e
(
A
d
u
l
t
)
Gr
e
e
n
=
M
a
l
e
(
A
d
u
l
t
)
Bl
u
e
=
M
a
l
e
(
M
i
n
o
r
)
Ye
l
l
o
w
=
F
e
m
a
l
e
(
M
i
n
o
r
)
0
0.
5
1
1.
5
2
2.
5
In
v
e
r
t
e
d
-
U
P
o
s
t
a
n
d
L
o
o
p
I
n
-
s
t
r
e
e
t
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
Co
r
ra
l
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
L
o
c
k
e
r
s
A
r
t
i
s
t
i
c
/
B
r
a
n
d
e
d
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
R
a
c
k
Bicycle Transit Center Parking
Pr
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
T
y
p
e
Re
d
=
F
e
m
a
l
e
(
A
d
u
l
t
)
Gr
e
e
n
=
M
a
l
e
(
A
d
u
l
t
)
Bl
u
e
=
M
a
l
e
(
M
i
n
o
r
)
Ye
l
l
o
w
=
F
e
m
a
l
e
(
M
i
n
o
r
)
DOWNEY BICYCLE MASTER PLAN STAKEHOLDER INPUT
COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 - JULY 12, 2014
Project Name Facility Comments Count
Alameda St Connect to the east cut through hospital
Street is ok
Brookshire Ave Try road diet
Good north-south street
Downey Ave Strava Heat Map
Good north-south street
Firestone Bl Very busy (as with other major streets) with traffic. What's being done to enforce
safety for bicycle riders?
A challenge
Gardendale St Street is ok
Old River School Rd Good north-south street
Rives Ave Good north-south street to ride 2
Stewart & Grey Rd Street is ok
Suva St Street is ok
Woodruff Ave Good north-south street
3rd/5th St Streets are comfortable
Streets are ok
5th Street connection between San Gabriel River and Downtown
General/Uncat.Rancho Los Amigos is a place to bike, no bike/ped/vehicle contacts 2
Parking at Mcdonalds on Paramount
Pavement conditions
Connect businesses to bike path, such as the Old McDonalds
Bike racks on buses
Why charging for bike parking at Wilderness Park
Education on wrong way and sidewalk riding
Community Workshop #2
On Thursday, August 28, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m., the Downey Bicycle Mater Plan Study Team participated
in Community Workshop #2 at the Barbara J. Riley Community & Senior Center in Downey. The
community workshop was an opportunity for interested parties and key stakeholders to hear about the
draft Bicycle Master Plan, provide additional comments and feedback. The community workshop was
set-up in the recreation room with 22 people attendees including bicycle activists. The workshop was
composed in the following format:
Open House Session - 6 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.
Presentation - 6:30 p.m.
Public Feedback Exercise - 7:15 p.m.
Upon registering, attendees were provided a flyer for the next community workshop on Saturday,
September 6, as well as a comment card.
Miguel Núñez, Fehr & Peers opened the presentation by giving a project overview including the data and
community input used to develop the draft the Bicycle Master Plan. Miguel went into detail by
describing the type of data collected; different public outreach events made available to the public;
project website and social media; an online survey which all help to gather an analysis for the plan. He
indicated Phase 2 of the project calls for additional comments, feedback and suggestions from the
community which was made available to the public that night. Miguel also explained the next steps
needed for the project including the funding and implementation of the project and cost analysis.
Three stations were made available to the public. Project Overview, where attendees could get an
overall description of the project. Public Comment on Program Elements, where attendees had the
opportunity to vote for a bike facility, parking and wayfinding signs or offer any comments or ask
questions. Public Comment on Draft Plan, attendees had the opportunity to provide additional
comments on the proposed plan including areas that need more attention, challenges cyclists face in
certain areas or overall opinion about what can be done to offer a safer cycling community.
Questions/Comments brought up during presentation and discussion
Are there routes available that can be shared with other programs in the city or community?
Did you cross-reference the Plan with any of the neighboring cities in Downey?
Is the data collected available online?
Wayfinding signage should be cohesive with all city signage, creating a branding that people will
recognize instantly.
Education should be a priority
o For bicycle users and motorists
o A certification for safe bicycling would be a good idea to motivate others to engage in
safe biking
Attendees Sign-in
Open House
Presentation
Community Input
DOWNEY BICYCLE MASTER PLAN STAKEHOLDER INPUT
COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #2 – AUGUST 28, 2014
Topic
(by Board)
Location
(if applicable) Comments
Bicycle Wayfinding Placed over MUTCD More cohesive branding with city
Contact brand consultants for input?
Zoning Map 3-foot law state law? Implement in Downey!
Wayfinding -> cohesive w/ rebrand of Downtown Downey should be aligned
Programs & Policies Education Downey Ave ?? Education door campaign -less noise -cleaner air
Education to cyclists about rules of the road
Road riding experience + training
Encouragement /
Evaluation
Branding & marketing on educating motorists about how bicyclists are moving
vehicles & to share the roads
FREE bike rides. Some city & LACBC sponsored rides cost $ & discourage
riders of color
Bicylist's "license" -> certified by the city to ride. Encouragement (Optional)
Bicycle Facility Types More amenities along the river paths to encourage use.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
MUTCD Downey
Theme 1
Downey
Theme 2
Downey
Theme 3
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
Wayfinding Style
Preferred Wayfinding Type
Topic
(by Board)
Location
(if applicable) Comments
Proposed Facilities Outside map area Gallery in Downtown could be a hub for public events including bike stuff.
Stay-Gallery
Highlight school connections + potential for SRTS work in the future.
Overlay land use w/ routes + facilities, parking
Route thru to Downey + Brookshire btwn Alameda +
Entrance to river paths - signage.
Ensure plans addressed Safe Routes to School
Recommends cycle track on Downey Ave on 1st phase
Western border
near Lynwood SMS
Imperial Hwy
Paramount Blvd Re-examine Paramound Blvd. for bike lanes
I-5 Underpass under I-5 by Downey Blvd btwn Lakewood + Paramount - open
back up?
Guatemala ends @ I-5
Need better connection to Dennis the Menace Park - Could result in increased
use of park
Bike Lane
Quoit / Everest St * Lines drawn in pen on map possibly indicating bike lanes on Quoit and
Everest Streets between Paramount and Birchdale
Firestone Blvd * Lines drawn in pen on map highlighting lack of connection on Firestone to
river bike path from proposed facilities on Stewart & Gray
Gallatin School
House Rd
* Lines drawn in pen on map highlighting lack of connection to river bike path
from Gallatin School House Rd.
Proposed End of Trip Facilities Outside map area Churches: Calvary, St Raymonds, Woodruff, LPH, Savid
Street labels
YMCA; DJAA
Suva
Open park facilities to cyclists -like Cerritos & Lakewood LBC
Target in Norwalk
Restaurant Row
Florence Paramount Haledon
Paramount at
Gallatin Cornerstone Church
Between I-5 and
Telegraph New retail
Firestone Blvd at
Old River School Rd Grocery/Markets/Banks
Lakewood at
Gallatin Parking needed at developments on corner of Lakewood/Gallatin
Florence Ave at
Lakewood Blvd Downey Pizza Co
Eastern border Wilderness parking Rio San Gabriel
Brookshire Ave Parking A DUSD & Downey Commons
Bellflower Blvd Parking A DUSD & Downey Commons
Bellflower at Foster
Rd Parking A DUSD & Downey Commons
Rio San Gabriel at
southern border near park
Community Workshop #3
On Saturday, September 6th from 10 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., the Downey Bicycle Mater Plan Consultant
Team hosted the third Community Workshop at Wilderness Park in order to continue its diligent efforts
in gathering feedback from the community. The community room at Wilderness Park filled up with over
25 people as bicyclists made their way from the adjacent San Gabriel River Trail and others stopped by
in the midst of enjoying a morning at the park.
After some time for participants to read through the available plan recommendations, a project
presentation was made to share the study findings, creating an opportunity for questions to be
answered. Following the presentation, a lively discussion arose from several community members as
they evaluated the proposed plan and talked about the current challenges of bicycling in Downey.
Overall, the workshop fostered an environment for participants to learn about the plan, share concerns,
and imagine ways to improve the viability of bicycling throughout Downey.
Questions/Comments brought up during presentation and discussion
• How long will it take to see implementation?
o Ed Norris and Miguel Nunez explained how the recommended infrastructure is likely to
roll out
• How much have local businesses been worked with?
o Thoughts of engaging local businesses to encourage safe street behavior to all users
o People want to be healthy and bicycle, but need a place to park
o Provide local business with stickers to show they are bike friendly
• Drivers need education and acknowledge bicyclist right to the road
• Suggestions of education campaigns through pamphlets or door hangers
• Neighborhood watch groups could be a good place to begin educational outreach
• Prioritization of plans along schools to allow children to arrive safely
DOWNEY BICYCLE MASTER PLAN STAKEHOLDER INPUT
COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #3 – SEPTEMBER 6, 2014
Topic
(by Board)
Location
(if applicable) Comments
Bicycle Wayfinding 1 vote for each option, except MUTCD which received no votes.
Programs & Policies Offer bicycle maintenance courses
Have local bike shops and / or bike oriented groups sponsor or fund
community related bike education
After school programs to educate public school children on riding safely and
using existing and future facilities. I.e., 2-4 week class, $5-$10 course.
Offer opportunity for owner operated bike facility similar to a regular private
owned parking lot.
0
1
2
MUTCDDowney Theme 1Downey Theme 2Downey Theme 3
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
Wayfinding Style
Preferred Wayfinding Type
Topic
(by Board)
Location
(if applicable) Comments
Proposed Facilities
Florence and
Paramount (amont
others)
Implement bicycle turn boxes at major intersections so cyclists as well as
motorists know and have safe "visual" indicator at stops along intersections.
(i.e. Florence and Paramount)
Burns Ave Conside bike lane near tracks along Burns Ave from Old River School Road to
Paramount (and beyond?)
Florence and SGR
Path
Florence bridge over San Gabriel River bed - bridge too narrow and not safe
enough to ride across - too narrow a path; no concrete divider between
riders/peds and cars.
Along I-5 Fwy
What can we get from the state with the expansion of the 5 Freeway? Perhaps
a bike lane from Rio Hondo Bike Path to Rio San Gabriel Bike Path, separate
from Telegraph traffic
I-5 Fwy and SGR
Path
Clear out homeless living along the freeway between river bed and freeway -
not safe, expecially with kids
Firestone and SGR
Path Will new Firestone Blvd bridge over SGR have wider sidewalks or bike lanes?
Cecilia and SGR
Path Unofficial access points to SGR path south of Wilderness Park n/o Cecilia
Pico Vista Rd
between Cecilia St
and Florence
Bike facility along Pico Vista Rd/ Gaybrook Ave, punch through connection to
Florence access point to SGR path [what about Lesterford Ave?]
Florence and SGR
Path Access points to SGR path from Florence has narrow sidewalks, poor access
Florence and SGR
Path
Access point to Florence Ave from neighborhood to the north - obstacle.
[Sidewalk cut through the frontage road on N side of Florence; no curb cut.]
Manzanar Ave and
I-5 Underpass removed at Manzanar Ave?
Pangborn Ave
Bike facility along Pangborn Ave between Florence and Firestone [also one
block along south frontage road on Florence, ped crossing at Florence, and
three blocks along frontage road to the north gets you almost to the Florence
SGR crossing]
(move to Programs
& Policies) Business stickers, Downey Patriot Educational Article; Neighborhood Watch
(move to Programs
& Policies) All About Downey - add bike maps
(move to Programs
& Policies) Law enforcement buy-in?
(move to Programs
& Policies) Bike Downey poster - Rives, Downey - "bike path coming"
Proposed End of Trip Facilities Design sculpture or artistic racks to allow many bikes to lock up; design to
discourage children playing on them.
Consider bike parkin that also accommodates trikes for older population.
Russel's Bike Shop is selling lots of trikes.
Consider a meeting at the Public Library at Downey Civic Center.
Firestone Blvd and
Rives Ave Include parking near Albertsons.
Firestone Blvd and
Downey Ave Include parking near Fresh & Easy.
Lakewood Blvd n/o
Cherokee Dr Include parking at the Post Office
DOWNEY BICYCLE MASTER PLAN
NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY OPEN-ENDED RESPONSES
The online survey was a general needs assessment of bicycling in the city, asking respondents to
rate their comfort in cycling in Downey, frequency of cycling for specific purposes, and to
identify challenges and opportunities for cycling in the city. A few questions allowed open-
ended responses for identifying favorite or challenging streets and intersections for cycling. Fehr
& Peers staff analyzed the open ended questions by reading and documenting each response.
As common themes became apparent, key search terms were generated, and then quantified to
determine the frequency of high priority topics. From this initial review, tables were created
showing the frequency of each individual category.
Question 5 asked What are your favorite places or routes to bike ride in Downey? Why?
Reviewing all of the survey responses, staff identified 34 individual categories of favorite places
or reasons for biking in Downey. Responses ranged from general concepts like “river path” to
specific roads or destinations. Some destinations could be grouped together (“Downtown”). The
top ten most common responses to this question were:
Street/Destination Occurrences
Percent of
Total
River Bike Paths 59 23%
Parks 32 12%
Side Streets 17 7%
Downtown 13 5%
Florence Ave 11 4%
Lakewood Blvd 11 4%
Rives Ave 11 4%
Downey Blvd 10 4%
Firestone Blvd 10 4%
Paramount Blvd 9 4%
Many respondents identify two bike paths, the Rio Hondo and San Gabriel river paths, as their
preferred place to ride. Respondents often noted some variation on the theme of “side streets,”
identifying their local neighborhood roads as the preferred riding environment on the quieter
local streets, relative to higher-volume and higher-capacity streets. Many of the other 29
individual categories were specific neighborhood streets respondents preferred, such as Tweedy
Lane.
Question 6 asked What are some of the more challenging streets or intersections to bike
on? Why?
The same review strategy for this question resulted in 30 individual categories which reflected a
theme of major boulevards and heavy, high-speed traffic as challenges facing bicyclists. The 10
most frequent responses are shown below.
Street/Intersection or
Challenge Occurrences
Percent of
Total
Firestone Blvd 89 19%
Florence Ave 54 12%
Heavy Traffic 52 11%
Lakewood Blvd 45 10%
Paramount Blvd 39 9%
Imperial Hwy 34 7%
No Bike Lanes 30 7%
High Vehicular Speed 25 5%
No/Small Sidewalks 11 2%
Aggressive Drivers 9 2%
Although there were fewer unique concepts than the previous question, the number of
individual categories respondents identified were nearly double, suggesting people had more to
say about the challenges. Many responses included specific streets paired with concerns about
traffic conditions, motorist behavior, or lack of space for bike lanes. Of particular note were the
responses which identified the preference to ride on the sidewalk (presumably for safety) and
the challenges posed by narrow or obstructed sidewalks.
Question 7 asked If you were “Bicycling Czar” for a day, what would you do to make
biking in Downey safer and easier? (You can name a specific location or project, city-wide
improvements, or an activity or policy).
Below are the top 10 most frequent responses, although individual categories were only 14
total. The two clear themes in responses to this question were to add bike lanes and/or off-
street bike paths. Respondents tended to generalize about adding bike lanes and paths to major
streets, rather than identifying specific routes.
Many responses regarding education or enforcement focused on motorist knowledge of laws
regarding bicycling and the vehicle code. Many suggested adding bicycle awareness signage
along roads and routes for motorists, which also relates to the education and enforcement
sentiment. Some respondents called for more bicycling events, such as the Tour de Downey and
CicLAvia (open-streets events). Others asked for reduction in speed limits or other strategies to
slow cars down and make cycling more comfortable.
Street/Destination Occurrences
Percent of
Total
Add Bike Lanes 87 41%
Off-Street Bike Paths 31 15%
Education 18 8%
Enforcement 16 8%
Add Bike Awareness Signs 15 7%
Add Bike Facilities 12 6%
Hold Bike Events 11 5%
Reduce Vehicle Speed 7 3%
Fix/Improve Pavement 5 2%
Add Bike Racks 4 2%
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
1 / 33
49.55%111
33.48%75
14.73%33
1.34%3
0.89%2
Q1 Which of the following best describes
how you feel about bicycling on streets in
Downey?
Answered: 224 Skipped: 7
Total 224
I ride
regularly bu...
I am
interested, ...
I am
comfortable...
I am not
interested i...
I don't know
how to ride ...
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Answer Choices Responses
I ride regularly but prefer dedicated facilities such as bike lanes and paths.
I am interested, but have concerns, so I never or rarely ride my bicycle on the streets.
I am comfortable riding on any street and prefer the most direct route.
I am not interested in any way and do not ride my bicycle on the streets.
I don't know how to ride a bicycle, but I would be interested in learning.
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
2 / 33
Q2 How often do you...
Answered: 229 Skipped: 2
9.46%
21
18.02%
40
18.02%
40
18.47%
41
36.04%
80
222
8.41%
19
26.55%
60
24.34%
55
24.34%
55
16.37%
37
226
8.64%
19
29.09%
64
25.00%
55
21.82%
48
15.45%
34
220
3.62%
8
5.43%
12
6.33%
14
15.84%
35
68.78%
152
221
Every day A few times a week A few times a month A few times a year
Never
…bike for
transportati...
…bike for fun
or
exercise?...
…bike
outside
Downey?
…bike to
transit (i.e...
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Every dayA few times a weekA few times a monthA few times a yearNeverTotal
…bike for transportation? (school, work, errands, etc)
…bike for fun or exercise? (around the park, etc)
…bike outside Downey?
…bike to transit (i.e. Downey Link or Metro bus or rail)?
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
3 / 33
85.84%194
81.86%185
54.42%123
46.46%105
43.81%99
26.55%60
23.45%53
8.85%20
7.52%17
5.31%12
4.87%11
1.33%3
1.33%3
Q3 Below are some potential challenges
and obstacles to biking. In your opinion, do
they discourage people from biking in
Downey? (You may select more than one
choice.)
Answered: 226 Skipped: 5
Total Respondents: 226
No bike lanes
Speeding or
aggressive...
No bike
parking (bik...
Streets are
too wide or...
Parked cars
present a...
Few or no
amenities...
Concerns about
crime
I prefer to
drive
Inadequate
transit serv...
Distances
between...
I prefer to
walk
Steep hills
I just don’t
like to bike
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Answer Choices Responses
No bike lanes
Speeding or aggressive driving
No bike parking (bike racks)
Streets are too wide or busy
Parked cars present a danger to me
Few or no amenities (water fountains, benches, trash cans, etc)
Concerns about crime
I prefer to drive
Inadequate transit service (or else I might bike to transit)
Distances between destinations are too long
I prefer to walk
Steep hills
I just don’t like to bike
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
4 / 33
Total Respondents: 226
#Other (please specify)Date
1 Need a bicyling map to safe routes in Downey.7/22/2014 10:48 AM
2 Rain or excessive heat 7/15/2014 10:29 AM
3 Drivers don't know rules of sharing the road 7/12/2014 8:17 PM
4 The streets do not feel safe for bike riding with young children due to lack of bike lanes and excessive traffic 7/9/2014 11:49 PM
5 the uneven roads like paramount n lakewood pose many dangers that I'm always concerned about.7/8/2014 6:43 PM
6 lack of awareness of sharing the road with cyclists 7/8/2014 2:42 PM
7 The city needs more Bike awareness sings/"share the road"7/8/2014 11:12 AM
8 Inadequate Lighting 7/8/2014 11:09 AM
9 ignorant drivers don't know rules.7/7/2014 10:30 PM
10 pot holes, jaggety roads,7/7/2014 5:56 AM
11 We need Bike lanes 7/6/2014 9:57 AM
12 major streets like imperial, florence, firestone way too dangerous. very few of any bike lanes, i would be worried to leave my bike
in downey even if it were locked
7/2/2014 5:02 PM
13 Streets have many lanes. Just not mny for cyclists.7/2/2014 2:54 PM
14 Lack of Bike locker availability at transit stations 6/25/2014 10:58 AM
15 It feels unsafe to ride along the bike path San Gabriel river bike path, Rio Hondo bike path. I would like to ride to work on it but I
feel very unsafe. Too many homeless people living under FWY passages along the bike path.
6/21/2014 9:37 AM
16 Potholes and cracks in road 6/19/2014 9:48 PM
17 I have young children and not a lot of extra time 6/19/2014 12:00 PM
18 Not enough signals and some roads need better maintenance, like on firestone blvd 6/17/2014 8:35 PM
19 Bike lanes needed 6/17/2014 3:36 PM
20 bike/ped/driver etiquette 6/17/2014 2:16 PM
21 Motorist behavior 6/14/2014 12:02 PM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
5 / 33
Q4 Below are some ways to improve
conditions for bicyclists. In general, how
important do you think these are for
Downey?
Answered: 222 Skipped: 9
78.64%
173
17.73%
39
3.64%
8
220
56.36%
124
38.18%
84
5.45%
12
220
61.97%
132
29.58%
63
8.45%
18
213
52.07%
113
32.26%
70
15.67%
34
217
34.60%
73
37.91%
80
27.49%
58
211
33.66%
69
40.00%
82
26.34%
54
205
54.07%34.45%11.48%
Very important Somewhat important Not important
Bike lanes on
busy streets
Off-street
bike paths...
On-street
bike
paths
separa...
Neighborhood
streets that...
Slower
vehicle
traffic on...
More
destinations...
Bike parking
(bike racks)...
Increased
enforcement
...
More transit
service (I...
Nicely
landscaped...
More time at
traffic ligh...
More or
better
street lights
Classes
where
I can learn...
Education to
motorists...
A map of the
city
showing...
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Very importantSomewhat importantNot importantTotal
Bike lanes on busy streets
Off-street bike paths completely separated from traffic
On-street bike paths separated from traffic by parked cars or a curb
Neighborhood streets that give bicycles and pedestrians priority by reducing vehicle traffic and speeds
Slower vehicle traffic on major streets
More destinations in my neighborhood
Bike parking (bike racks) / storage (bike lockers)
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
6 / 33
54.07%
113
34.45%
72
11.48%
24
209
56.94%
123
31.02%
67
12.04%
26
216
19.71%
41
42.79%
89
37.50%
78
208
38.46%
80
39.42%
82
22.12%
46
208
24.29%
51
48.10%
101
27.62%
58
210
45.75%
97
33.02%
70
21.23%
45
212
20.93%
45
39.07%
84
40.00%
86
215
59.82%
131
25.57%
56
14.61%
32
219
67.14%
143
24.88%
53
7.98%
17
213
#Other (please specify)Date
1 more shade trees planted wherever possible, including the riverbed bike paths 7/26/2014 10:10 PM
2 BIKE LANES on streets easily seen by vehicle drivers 7/18/2014 12:04 PM
3 bicyclists/peds must know they don't always have the right of way 7/11/2014 4:06 PM
4 Enforcement of the no tinting on front seat car windows!7/10/2014 11:16 AM
5 Education to bicyclist. Too many time I see they go from street to sidewalk. They don't follow traffic lights 7/9/2014 10:30 AM
6 It would be incredible to be able to connect all the city parks via bike paths or lanes.7/8/2014 11:36 AM
7 Downey should be the "Hub City."7/7/2014 10:34 PM
8 We need Bike lanes 7/6/2014 9:57 AM
9 Signs that remind drivers to sawfly pass cyclists. Designated lanes with bright color. Even if it is just 8-10 streets but the public was
aware those streets go to all main attractions and both riverbeds (San Gabriel and Long beach river trails)
7/2/2014 2:59 PM
10 Nicely paved roads.6/19/2014 9:51 PM
11 Free events and biking education. I don't think it's right to charge.6/18/2014 11:22 AM
12 More street signs alerting vehicles of bike traffic 6/17/2014 8:37 PM
13 "Share the Road" type of signage.6/17/2014 7:49 PM
14 Education to bicyclists on etiquette/application of laws; connections to destination outside of the city/ river to river loop 6/17/2014 2:18 PM
15 Easier access to 605 & 710 riverbed paths 6/16/2014 4:57 PM
16 Remove all bums from riverbed 6/14/2014 2:35 PM
Bike parking (bike racks) / storage (bike lockers)
Increased enforcement of traffic laws (speeding, not stopping, safely passing, etc)
More transit service (I would bike to/from transit)
Nicely landscaped streets
More time at traffic lights to cross intersections
More or better street lights
Classes where I can learn biking skills and bike maintenance
Education to motorists explaining the rights of bicyclists
A map of the city showing recommended routes to popular destinations
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
7 / 33
Q5 What are your favorite places or routes
to bike ride in Downey? Why?
Answered: 173 Skipped: 58
#Responses Date
1 along the Rio Hondo river bikeway, because there is no vehicle traffic 7/26/2014 10:11 PM
2 along the bike pailer near river beds 7/25/2014 9:23 PM
3 The Riverbed...safe out of car traffic.7/22/2014 11:00 AM
4 Rives avenue. Least lights 7/21/2014 9:27 PM
5 Every morning I take Imperial Hwy east from Paramount to the river bed, then the river bed to Alondra in Norwalk to get to work. It's
a safe enough ride, and I like to take a wide street that enables cars to pass me when they need to.
7/20/2014 1:57 PM
6 to Ralphs market, church, Barbara Riley center 7/19/2014 4:57 PM
7 Rives ave, my neighborhood, mainly due to lack of traffic,7/18/2014 4:16 PM
8 N/A 7/18/2014 12:30 PM
9 Gardendale to 605 bike path from paramount blvd. Lakewood Blvd. to Stonewood, Downey Eatery, Stewart & Gray shopping mall.7/18/2014 12:10 PM
10 I usually go to the area around the Downey Court, the streets are wide and less vehicular traffic, then also I ride on Rives, Old
River School road and Stewart and Gray sometimes Paramount
7/15/2014 3:43 PM
11 riverbed, Farmer's Market, friends home 7/15/2014 11:02 AM
12 I don't ride a bike in Downey 7/15/2014 10:58 AM
13 Wilderness Park since it takes me to Orr & Day/Imperial area of Norwalk 7/15/2014 10:43 AM
14 Woodruff Avenue 7/15/2014 10:38 AM
15 The park and riverbed 7/15/2014 10:31 AM
16 Imperial Highway, Brookshire Avenue 7/15/2014 10:27 AM
17 Not a Downey resident but would bike on city 7/15/2014 10:24 AM
18 By river (San Gabriel). No cars 7/15/2014 10:07 AM
19 Movies and parks 7/15/2014 9:46 AM
20 Riverbed fun and get a chance to ride with other cyclist 7/15/2014 9:43 AM
21 To and from work. I work for the school district and with school traffic it is more convenient 7/14/2014 5:10 PM
22 neighborhood/non-busy streets because it's quiet safe and peaceful 7/14/2014 5:05 PM
23 to Rancho where there is no traffic. Bike trail at Wilderness Park.7/14/2014 5:02 PM
24 Furman Park for the summer concerts 7/14/2014 4:57 PM
25 The park-any behind freeway bike road 7/14/2014 4:49 PM
26 River paths 7/13/2014 8:57 PM
27 Downtown Downey destination (library, farmers market, restaurants). Rio Hondo trail 7/12/2014 8:20 PM
28 Paramount, Florence, Imperial Highway. Smooth pavement.7/12/2014 11:22 AM
29 Paramount; long street 7/12/2014 10:51 AM
30 Farmers market 7/12/2014 10:44 AM
31 I enjoy biking to the beach and to parks.7/12/2014 10:42 AM
32 Down Firestone 7/12/2014 10:32 AM
33 Lakewood blvd 7/12/2014 10:12 AM
34 River path 605 and 710 7/12/2014 10:11 AM
35 Down town 7/12/2014 9:49 AM
36 Farmers market, Furman Park 7/11/2014 11:39 PM
37 residential streets 7/11/2014 4:08 PM
38 Gallatin road to the 605 riverbed. Suva to the 710 riverbed. I use these to get to the riverbed trails to go to the mountains or the
beach.
7/11/2014 2:38 PM
39 San Gabriel/Rio Hondo Bike Path Paramount Blvd Rosemead Blvd 7/11/2014 2:31 PM
40 Friends or family's houses. Not wasting fuel and getting some exercise.7/11/2014 9:55 AM
41 Anywhere as long as we get bike lanes.7/11/2014 12:23 AM
42 Through Rancho Los Amigos property, Stewart and Gray, Brookshire, Downey Avenue 7/10/2014 11:27 AM
43 Downtown Downey simply because most vehicle traffic is at a slower speed thorughout the area/7/10/2014 7:27 AM
44 Farmers Market, Parks, Restaurants 7/9/2014 11:56 PM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
8 / 33
45 Parks, restaurants, bars 7/9/2014 10:35 PM
46 If I do ride it is in the early morning due to less traffic and it is anywhere from florence to telegraph side street between these st.7/9/2014 9:54 PM
47 Downey Landing, Downtown Downey, along Lakewood Blvd mostly.7/9/2014 5:35 PM
48 River to river. Side streets to parks.7/9/2014 4:21 PM
49 Downey rd. along the riverbed (605)7/9/2014 10:33 AM
50 The different parks in Downey 7/9/2014 10:16 AM
51 I enjoy riding down Lakewood Blvd. Day or Night. During the day, though there is a lot of traffic, the lane is wide, allowing for
ample room between cars and I. At night, the lights are bright, and make riding very fun. Not to mention, the asphalt is extremely
smooth. I usually go out of my way to go down Lakewood, I absolutely love it. I also enjoy riding down Downey Ave., though it's
not as wide, it's slow enough that I can keep up with the cars, and I enjoy seeing people walk and traverse through town. Porto's!
Can't miss Porto's.
7/9/2014 10:12 AM
52 The park because it feels safest at the moment. I also like to ride along the rivers but don't feel as safe sometimes because its
desolate and dirty.
7/9/2014 9:23 AM
53 Don't really like riding in Downey that much for safety reasons 7/9/2014 9:06 AM
54 Old River School, Galletin, residential streets Quieter, less traffic, easier to keep an eye on cars and pedestrians 7/9/2014 8:44 AM
55 Florence, Firestone blvd, Downey landings, parks, discovery park, Jim,7/8/2014 9:10 PM
56 Rives Ave, Along the River (710), wilderness park because they're relatively quiet and cars are rarely on them 7/8/2014 9:02 PM
57 Using the bike oath by the river because it is much safer than riding in the streets with vehicles. Many drivers do not care to drive
by bicyclists and get too close.
7/8/2014 9:01 PM
58 River beds are my favorite place to ride in Downey, I feel traffic safe due the assigned bike lanes. Downey needs bike lanes on
Major streets. This will make Downey a bike friendly city.
7/8/2014 6:55 PM
59 the parks and downey landing. because they r nice areas to be at and hangout at also the area of downey and firestone is a nice
place to relax at.
7/8/2014 6:48 PM
60 Metro station, innout, coffee.7/8/2014 6:16 PM
61 Downtown Downey. #downtowney 7/8/2014 5:17 PM
62 I like riding my bike from my house on Imperial hwy, to Furman Park, because I feel that after you cross Firestone, the traffic isn't
as bad on Rives.
7/8/2014 3:50 PM
63 Wilderness park because there is no traffic 7/8/2014 3:14 PM
64 I live close to the Rio Hondo river bike path and use that to bike long distances on the path or to other cities. But my dad has been
hit on his bike riding from his house to the path, and so I don't use the path as much because of the lack of bike lanes and driver
awareness of how to share the road. I like using the path to Long Beach, but we have to drive all the way to Wilderness Park
because I don't feel safe riding on Firestone.
7/8/2014 2:46 PM
65 Side streets with fewer cars 7/8/2014 2:42 PM
66 Around or near Furman Park and Rives Ave from Furman Park to Apollo Park and back 7/8/2014 1:58 PM
67 Down Paramount and Imperial 7/8/2014 12:37 PM
68 Downtown downey. 3rd St coffee. Old McDonalds. We like to keep it local.7/8/2014 12:37 PM
69 Downey needs better parks and bike paths 7/8/2014 12:31 PM
70 Parks 7/8/2014 12:21 PM
71 I prefer riding around my neighborhood during low traffic hours.7/8/2014 11:42 AM
72 Ranching Los amigos - no traffic 7/8/2014 11:30 AM
73 Firestone cause it takes me straight to the LA river towards LA 7/8/2014 11:29 AM
74 Wilderness Park, Independence Park. I used to bike to work, but it got too dangerous because its too dark down Bellflower Blvd.7/8/2014 11:15 AM
75 Riverbed it's away from crazy traffic and cleaner air. But this concerns me that crime is higher on riverbed 7/8/2014 11:15 AM
76 Down firestone its a long stretch and fast paced. Also all the way down paramount blvd.7/8/2014 11:11 AM
77 I am not fimiliar with any in Downey. I'd love to know of a beautiful scenic route.7/8/2014 10:43 AM
78 Around my neighborhood on brookshire between imperial and gardendale 7/8/2014 10:41 AM
79 Down Firestone or Stewart and grey to get to the river beds.7/8/2014 10:20 AM
80 Just as a thoroughfair to get to riverbed. I do 50 to 100 mile bike rides, i dont use downey as a destination other than to get home
from a long ride.
7/8/2014 10:12 AM
81 I like riding along the San Gabriel River Bed because there are no cars.7/8/2014 10:11 AM
82 If I would bike sone where it would be to the downtown downey area.7/8/2014 10:07 AM
83 Gallatin and Downey, Gallatin and Brookshire 7/8/2014 10:01 AM
84 In n Out, Downey Landing, Gateway 7/8/2014 9:47 AM
85 Gallantin River bed 7/8/2014 9:44 AM
86 Take the residential streets down to the riverbed and ride from there. Less traffic and you can bike faster through those streets.7/8/2014 9:29 AM
87 Riverbeds and by the island 7/8/2014 1:02 AM
88 I usually only bike around Downey to get to work.7/7/2014 10:54 PM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
9 / 33
89 River trails around Downey, Rives, 5th, Gardendale/Foster, Downey Ave., Brookshire, Firestone. Because of their practicality.7/7/2014 10:43 PM
90 I like to bike to parks and many different markets to shop for food. I also like to bike, in general around the city for exercise.7/7/2014 10:26 PM
91 San Gabriel riverbed, only dedicated bike path 7/7/2014 10:20 PM
92 work- the hospital.7/6/2014 8:51 PM
93 The mall, restaurants off Firestone, library, parks, post office, kids to schools.7/6/2014 11:34 AM
94 The river bike path it's more safe 7/6/2014 10:59 AM
95 I like riding the smaller streets, such as 5th ave-3rd ave to furman park, riding up Gallatin to Dennis the Menace park 7/6/2014 10:17 AM
96 I would like to ride my bike to work but since we don't have bike lanes I don't. I feel very unsafe on the streets of Downey. My route
are Florence and Firestone.
7/6/2014 10:02 AM
97 From home in NW Dny to downtown 7/6/2014 8:37 AM
98 To Rio Hondo River.7/3/2014 10:02 PM
99 I prefer to ride on the San Gabriel River trail, since automobiles are not allowed. I can ride without worries about getting hit by a
car.
7/3/2014 11:49 AM
100 Parks, fairs, places to eat, & anything fun cause bike riding should be fun.7/2/2014 8:08 PM
101 N/A 7/2/2014 6:52 PM
102 Rancho Los amigos 7/2/2014 6:38 PM
103 the riverbed to get to work 7/2/2014 5:04 PM
104 The San Gabriel Bike path 7/2/2014 4:11 PM
105 Wilderness Park (family atmosphere) and Rives Avenue (slower traffic)7/2/2014 3:24 PM
106 To downtown (food). Parks (bring kids and make them more active). Downtown for farmers market.7/2/2014 3:09 PM
107 I like to ride my bike with my children to the park. However, I don't trust motorists.7/2/2014 2:34 PM
108 I am not sure.7/2/2014 12:28 PM
109 Honestly we do not bike ride often enough in Downey to say. It would be ideal to bike ride to restaurants.7/2/2014 11:50 AM
110 I enjoy the river bed because it is very safe and can get me to relatively any location.6/29/2014 3:25 PM
111 Downey ave & Firestone blvd. past to church at 4th and new st.6/28/2014 2:21 PM
112 Lakewood Blvd. It is very smooth! Lighting is amazing at night. Lanes are wide. I don't mind sharing. :) Rives is pleasant. So is
Brookshire. Stewart & Grey is borderline scary.
6/26/2014 4:11 PM
113 Along the Waterway - it is far from cars and nice and flat. I would like to start biking to the train station, but nearly had my bike
stolen from the open bike rack once in the past.
6/25/2014 11:03 AM
114 I didn't know where to go to ride 6/23/2014 1:32 PM
115 Rio Hondo River Path - easy access to the City 6/23/2014 1:30 PM
116 Rio Hondo bike path and San Gabriel River Bike Path. Nice scenery.6/23/2014 1:24 PM
117 I like to ride to Furman Park because it's close to home 6/23/2014 1:19 PM
118 paths to riverheads 6/23/2014 1:10 PM
119 San Gabriel Trail 6/23/2014 1:07 PM
120 Fairly new to city, but Rio Hondo bike path is my favorite.6/23/2014 11:58 AM
121 Marathons because I feel safer 6/23/2014 11:54 AM
122 River beds because there is no vehicle traffic to worry about and designated bike paths.6/22/2014 11:03 AM
123 Residential due to less traffic.6/21/2014 9:44 AM
124 out to San Gabriel River 6/20/2014 11:05 PM
125 bike path - dog park tripicana 6/20/2014 4:13 PM
126 Florence ave connecting two bike paths.6/19/2014 9:55 PM
127 I mostly ride on Telegraph Rd. I also travel to several shopping destinations on Florence and Lakewood.6/19/2014 6:02 PM
128 I like to ride my bike on 5th street because there is less traffic and it's a good alternative to Firestone and Florence. I bike to
Downey/Firestone for a quick bite to eat or bike all the way to Rio San Gabriel Park and ride along the bike path on the riverbed.
6/19/2014 3:34 PM
129 Through Lakewood and woodruff, many places to go from the street routes 6/19/2014 12:32 AM
130 I like to bike to Long Beach using the same route as the rock and ride event downey held 6/18/2014 8:07 PM
131 San Gabriel trail is the best.6/18/2014 6:41 PM
132 LA Rive Bike Path and the San Gabriel River Bike Path 6/18/2014 11:23 AM
133 Downey Nature Park, because there's easy access to the San Gabriel River. Down Lakewood Boulevard, considering the easy
access going up and down that street.
6/18/2014 12:13 AM
134 I use the Rio Hondo bike path located by the Island. It's a direct route to go long distance without worrying about cars.6/17/2014 10:44 PM
135 Rio Hondo/LA River, Rives Avenue, Stewart & Gray Rd. All have no or lower than average motor traffic.6/17/2014 10:01 PM
136 All the streets are pretty good. I specially like riding on florence to studabaker and back on firestone.6/17/2014 8:55 PM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
10 / 33
137 Florence ave - pavement is good, wide street so there's more room for safe riding 6/17/2014 8:46 PM
138 To my kids schools and back, local stores and small errands.6/17/2014 8:21 PM
139 Foster Road, because it connects to the San Gabriel River Trail and traffic is light.6/17/2014 8:02 PM
140 Old river school road and Stewart and gray to the rio Hondo river bed.6/17/2014 5:56 PM
141 Gardandale to river bay bike ride Stewart and grey imperial paramount Lakewood Downey ave Florence see the whole city 6/17/2014 3:42 PM
142 Downtown Downey Parks - enjoyment, food and transportation 6/17/2014 3:32 PM
143 Rives, Downey and Brookshire are excellent streets to ride on to go North and South through the City. 3rd Street, Quill and
Gallatin are relatively comfortable for travelling East to West, but there are is definitely a lack of connectivity of low stress streets
that would be welcoming to newer bicyclists. These streets are relatively low traffic and tend to be wide enough to allow traffic to
pass by safely.
6/17/2014 2:27 PM
144 down Stewart & Grey between the LA and San Gabriel river creating a loop; lakewood blvd. downey ave from paramount to north
downey - transit, errands, etc
6/17/2014 2:22 PM
145 Gallatin to end right to Florence left to 605 riverbed path. Suva to 710 riverbed path.6/16/2014 5:04 PM
146 The 6 mile route today was great!6/14/2014 3:42 PM
147 Casanes Ave 6/14/2014 3:24 PM
148 Florence Ave. around some not transitade streets 6/14/2014 3:15 PM
149 In Downey there's no bike lanes so I have to ride to next city thru bike lanes 6/14/2014 3:09 PM
150 Woodruff and Firestone 6/14/2014 3:09 PM
151 I do not yet bike.6/14/2014 2:59 PM
152 The neighborhood streets, bigger streets and less traffic 6/14/2014 2:58 PM
153 Parks and farmers market, for kids 6/14/2014 2:52 PM
154 Furman Park, Staterbros 6/14/2014 2:46 PM
155 YMCA L 6/14/2014 2:44 PM
156 Lakewood to Woodruff because I live in the area 6/14/2014 2:41 PM
157 The riverbed 6/14/2014 2:36 PM
158 I don't currently bike ride. Soon, I should do Northeast of Stonewood to downtown/Civic Center. Northeast to Wilderness Park6/14/2014 2:29 PM
159 On the San Gabriel trail 6/14/2014 2:25 PM
160 The riverbed 6/14/2014 2:21 PM
161 Side streets due to less traffic 6/14/2014 2:09 PM
162 All the residential streets.6/14/2014 1:52 PM
163 San Gabriel river route 6/14/2014 12:40 PM
164 Guatemala Suva tweedy 6/14/2014 12:36 PM
165 Around furman park 6/14/2014 12:23 PM
166 By fur an park area, due to quiter streets.6/14/2014 12:16 PM
167 Downey ave 6/14/2014 12:04 PM
168 Florence. I'm familiar with the street 6/14/2014 11:49 AM
169 River beds and back streets away from heavy traffic, east west north south corridors 6/14/2014 11:48 AM
170 Downey blvd. to downtown Downey 6/14/2014 11:28 AM
171 River bed because it is not busy 6/14/2014 11:14 AM
172 River paths 6/14/2014 10:53 AM
173 Garden dale 6/14/2014 7:17 AM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
11 / 33
Q6 What are some of the more challenging
streets or intersections to bike on? Why?
Answered: 176 Skipped: 55
#Responses Date
1 Florence Avenue going to Wilderness Park or under the 605 Freeway 7/26/2014 10:11 PM
2 Flornce ave and Firestone Bl. ss 7/25/2014 9:23 PM
3 Lakewood Blvd, & especially near freeway entrances and exits. Firestone heavy traffic.7/22/2014 11:00 AM
4 Paramount and firestone 7/21/2014 9:27 PM
5 Traffic on Florence coming west from the river bed is challenging. Winds and traffic are my main problems.7/20/2014 1:57 PM
6 Firestone, Lakewood, major streets.7/19/2014 4:57 PM
7 Firestone and Florence the streets have to ruts 7/18/2014 9:14 PM
8 Firestone, Florence Ave, Lakewood Blvd, fast traffic and aggressive drivers 7/18/2014 8:23 PM
9 Paramount street, firestone blvd. Most of Downey streets lack bike lanes. Drivers very inconsiderate of bikers. Also what makes it
hard on busy streets or neighborhoods are lack of sidewalks and lights.
7/18/2014 4:16 PM
10 All major streets, lakewood, firestone, imperial, paramount, florence etc. Theres just too much traffic 7/18/2014 12:30 PM
11 Lakewood Blvd., Stewart & Gray, Firestone, Brookshire, Downey Ave., Paramount Blvd.7/18/2014 12:10 PM
12 Firestone, cause the traffic is too fast and the cars have narrow lanes, Downey Ave, same thing 7/15/2014 3:43 PM
13 See above 7/15/2014 10:58 AM
14 Firestone, busy main streets 7/15/2014 10:52 AM
15 Imperial Highway since cars drive 50 MPH or faster & no bike lane 7/15/2014 10:43 AM
16 Streets with constant construction and fast drivers 7/15/2014 10:38 AM
17 Firestone- Construction 7/15/2014 10:31 AM
18 Imperial, Florence, lots of traffic 7/15/2014 10:27 AM
19 Paramount, Lakewood, Firestone 7/15/2014 10:24 AM
20 Florence, Firestone, etc 7/15/2014 10:07 AM
21 busy streets with parked cars 7/15/2014 9:46 AM
22 Crazy drivers not having proper motorist and cyclist safety 7/15/2014 9:43 AM
23 Firestone, Lakewood, Stewart and Gray - too congested 7/14/2014 5:10 PM
24 narrow busy streets, boulevards, etc.7/14/2014 5:05 PM
25 Stewart and Gray is very dangerous-too narrow Rives-narrow with traffic 7/14/2014 5:02 PM
26 Firestone, Lakewood, dangerous traffic 7/14/2014 4:57 PM
27 Cars must respect and be alert of bike riders 7/14/2014 4:49 PM
28 Florence and Firestone 7/13/2014 8:57 PM
29 Paramount at 3rd b/c off-set & pedestrian push signals inconvenient.7/12/2014 8:20 PM
30 Paramount, Florence, Imperial. Too much traffic.7/12/2014 11:22 AM
31 Firestone blvd.; traffic 7/12/2014 10:51 AM
32 Firestone and imperial 7/12/2014 10:44 AM
33 The small streets because the roads aren't wide enough.7/12/2014 10:42 AM
34 Most of the street 7/12/2014 10:32 AM
35 Imperial blvd 7/12/2014 10:12 AM
36 Busy streets 7/12/2014 10:11 AM
37 Firestone 7/12/2014 9:49 AM
38 Paramount blvd. Firestone and Florence 7/11/2014 11:39 PM
39 downtown; traffic congestion 7/11/2014 4:08 PM
40 Florence, Firestone, Paramount and Lakewood. To fast traffic and no bike lanes.7/11/2014 2:38 PM
41 Rosemead & Paramount Blvds 7/11/2014 2:31 PM
42 Much of Firestone is dangerous to rice a bike on. Forces you to ride on sidewalk. Florence is also difficult and again forces riding
on the sidewalk where one is available. I typically avoid these and ride in the neighborhoods.
7/11/2014 9:55 AM
43 Florence and Firestone so I may go a longer distance.7/11/2014 12:23 AM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
12 / 33
44 Large intersections and streets like Lakewood Blvd., Firestone Blvd.; too many cars that try to crowd you off the road, speeding
cars; uneven pavement, cracks in the roads that are more than an inch wide; Paramount Blvd has no parking during certain hours
in the morning and cars are parked (no ticket on windshields) and I have to go around
7/10/2014 11:27 AM
45 Firestone Blvd, Florence Blvd, Imperial Blvd, Vehicles are a bit more hostile to slower bicycle traffic.7/10/2014 7:27 AM
46 Firestone, Florence, Pangborn, Lakewood, Woodruff and Brookshire 7/9/2014 11:56 PM
47 Lakewood blvd, Imperial, Firestone just to busy. Therefore just using side streets so I do not get hit not sure if there are bike lines
but I don't think so because I really don't ride these streets.
7/9/2014 9:54 PM
48 Lakewood Blvd, I love biking down it but it's pretty terrifying.7/9/2014 5:35 PM
49 Paramount. Firestone. Florence. Downey ave 7/9/2014 4:21 PM
50 Firestone. But I expect that from that street it's too busy to add bike traffic.7/9/2014 10:33 AM
51 Burns ave. there are no sidewalks 7/9/2014 10:16 AM
52 Firestone Blvd. and Florence are definitely the scariest ones. Firestone is very, very fast. When they removed the parking between
Paramount Blvd. and Downey Ave. I quit riding down that street. I avoid it at all costs now.
7/9/2014 10:12 AM
53 Major streets like Florence, Firestone, Imperial and Paramount because too much traffic and not marked for bicycles.7/9/2014 9:23 AM
54 For me all streets in Downey are a challenge 7/9/2014 9:06 AM
55 Florence, Firestone, Paramount, Imperial Too much traffic, traffic moving at a higher speed, careless drivers 7/9/2014 8:44 AM
56 Fire stone, Lakewood, Florence, high traffic 7/8/2014 9:10 PM
57 Florence, Firestone, paramount because none of them have bike lanes 7/8/2014 9:02 PM
58 Lakewood Blvd and Firestone die to traffic congestion. Especially where road work is being maintained on Firestone. Too much
going on that drivers do not pay attention to cyclists.
7/8/2014 9:01 PM
59 Firestone, imperial, paramount and Florence. These streets always have heavy traffic and not having a bike lane for cyclist makes
it unsafe and difficult for cyclist to travel with ease.
7/8/2014 6:55 PM
60 firestone and paramount. the whole lakewood street from north to south. and also Imperial hwy is a pain also.7/8/2014 6:48 PM
61 Firestone, and florence. Bad road condition, high traffic, speeding cars, no bike lanes 7/8/2014 6:16 PM
62 Imperial Hwy. Too busy and lots of areas without sidewalks or frontage areas.7/8/2014 5:17 PM
63 Imperial Hwy. Firestone Blvd and Florence Ave. for me are death traps. I've seen people bike on Imperial and I get so scared for
them, they are brave! The drivers unfortunately swerve around them so it makes it unsafe for both. If Imperial, Firestone and
Florence had a designated bike lane, I may consider riding on it. For now you'll find me riding on those sidewalks for my own
safety.
7/8/2014 3:50 PM
64 Both the smaller streets and the larger streets because of different reasons. I think they are currently equally as dangerous,
especially small intersections where there are no stop signs.
7/8/2014 2:46 PM
65 Major streets because of car drivers who break traffic laws 7/8/2014 2:42 PM
66 Florence, Firestone, Imperial due to much vehicle traffic and speeding.7/8/2014 1:58 PM
67 Firestone Blvd. because its a disaster for everyone 7/8/2014 12:37 PM
68 Firestone. drivers don't know bike laws.7/8/2014 12:37 PM
69 Florence and Firestone. Busy traffic 7/8/2014 12:31 PM
70 Florence Ave, Firestone Blvd, Lakewood Blvd, Paramount Blvd, Old River School. Dangerous to bike.7/8/2014 12:21 PM
71 Firestone due to traffic and aggressive and speeding traffic.7/8/2014 12:13 PM
72 Paramount Blvd., Florence Av. Too many speeding drivers, changing lanes without looking, etc.7/8/2014 11:42 AM
73 Paramount blvd between Florence and Gallatain 7/8/2014 11:30 AM
74 Firestone 7/8/2014 11:29 AM
75 Imperial Hwy and Bellflower Blvd.7/8/2014 11:15 AM
76 Lakewood Florence paramount firestone. Way too much traffic especially residents from neighboring cities 7/8/2014 11:15 AM
77 Firestone i would say is the most challenging, lots of traffic. It is a must to keep up with cars.7/8/2014 11:11 AM
78 Firestone is congested. Heavy traffic.7/8/2014 10:43 AM
79 Downey Lakewood blvd on one side the sidewalk is very small 7/8/2014 10:41 AM
80 Lake wood because near downey landing the tree are over grown and you cant avoid them 7/8/2014 10:28 AM
81 Majority of intersections on Stewart and grey and firestone along with Florence. Heavy traffic and in most areas not enough room
for riders to ride on the street.
7/8/2014 10:20 AM
82 Stewart and grey, to many par,ed cars close to traffic lane. Imperial, no bike lane. Very dangerous to ride on. Firestone, way to
dangerous to ride on.
7/8/2014 10:12 AM
83 Firestone is so narrow, I will never ride a bike there. There's no shoulder in the third lane.7/8/2014 10:11 AM
84 Firestone, Lakewood, paramount and Florence 7/8/2014 10:07 AM
85 Florence and Downey, any major intersection where oncoming traffic turning right doesn't look before beginning their turn,
people coming out of business parking lots onto Florence.
7/8/2014 10:01 AM
86 Firestone, Florence 7/8/2014 9:47 AM
87 Firestone blvd. Florence Lakewood blvd 7/8/2014 9:44 AM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
13 / 33
88 Firestone, Paramount. Busy all the time, Firestone in particular is a nightmare, no room for a cyclist.7/8/2014 9:29 AM
89 Paramount & Firestone. Too much traffic and speeding cars.7/8/2014 1:02 AM
90 The only challenge I find when bicycling is that I don't feel comfortable cycling on the street because there is no room between
the parked cars and the traffic. So I cycle on the sidewalk for safety reasons but now I have to be careful about pedestrians.
7/7/2014 10:54 PM
91 Stuart&Grey and Rives. Florence Firestone, and Imperial Highway, because too much car traffic going too fast.7/7/2014 10:43 PM
92 All main streets in Downey. The speed limit is too high and there is little to no space prvided for bicyclist to feel comfortable
riding. There also need to be more room on some of the side streets.
7/7/2014 10:26 PM
93 Firestone, too much traffic aggressive driving 7/7/2014 10:20 PM
94 imperial, bellflower, rosecrans- big arteries that connec to the river but way too busy and no bike lanes.7/6/2014 8:51 PM
95 Stewart and gray is pretty busy and for our children we prefer them to ride on the sidewalks which are always busy. There are no
bike lanes in downey but we notice there is plenty of room for new palm trees down all off Firestone to match the "bike in downey"
posters everywhere.
7/6/2014 11:34 AM
96 All along firestone the cars go even beyond the speed limit a few streets along Firestone have potholes 7/6/2014 10:59 AM
97 I haven't really encountered any challenges riding across the streets.7/6/2014 10:17 AM
98 Firestone. There's no bike lanes and people drive very fast in the street.7/6/2014 10:02 AM
99 Firestone Blvd is most challenging.7/6/2014 8:37 AM
100 I don't bike on the streets.7/3/2014 10:02 PM
101 Imperial Highway between the 605 freeway and the 710 freeway. Also, Bellflower Blvd between the 91 fwy and Firestone. Busy
streets with no bike lane and no shoulder. I therefore avoid those streets.
7/3/2014 11:49 AM
102 The busy streets should have dedicated bike lanes for a successful biking city.7/2/2014 8:08 PM
103 Paramount and Firestone Paramount and Florence Lakewood and Firestone 7/2/2014 6:52 PM
104 Paramount, rives, Firestone, imperial, Lakewood, Florence 7/2/2014 6:38 PM
105 Imperial, Firestone, Florence, part of lakewood 7/2/2014 5:04 PM
106 Very busy, multi lane streets need bike specific bike lanes 7/2/2014 4:11 PM
107 Firestone Boulevard and Lakewood Boulevard due to aggressive drivers 7/2/2014 3:24 PM
108 Firestone, Paramount, Lakewood, Telegraph and Florence. Some have bad roads (terrible patches and old cement). No room.
Angry traffic.
7/2/2014 3:09 PM
109 Major streets - no bike lanes or side walks - ex. Lakewood Blvd.7/2/2014 2:34 PM
110 Florence and Imperial and Firestone 7/2/2014 12:28 PM
111 Downey Ave would be ideal to bike ride on because all the local eateries are there (portos, yogurtland). It's congested with cars
which is understandable but makes it risky to ride with children.
7/2/2014 11:50 AM
112 Large streets like Paramount, Florence, Firestone, Lakewood, etc are a little more difficult to bike on and require more caution.6/29/2014 3:25 PM
113 to Firestone blvd.& Patton to ralpfs market, To Lakewood blvd. & Stewart and Gray rd. go shopping at Downey Landing.6/28/2014 2:21 PM
114 Firestone is scary. I avoid it at all costs. Too fast, almost got nailed three times actually.6/26/2014 4:11 PM
115 any busy street without a bike lane or wide sidewalk.6/25/2014 11:03 AM
116 Don't know safe ways to ride 6/23/2014 1:32 PM
117 not from the are but west to explore more.6/23/2014 1:30 PM
118 Telegraph, busy, potholes, no bike lanes, no access to Rio Hondo River bike path.6/23/2014 1:24 PM
119 Brookshire streets without sidewalks 6/23/2014 1:19 PM
120 meh, i'm an aggressive rider so cars don't bother me 6/23/2014 1:10 PM
121 None 6/23/2014 1:07 PM
122 NA 6/23/2014 11:58 AM
123 The parks because it is hard with all the cars 6/23/2014 11:54 AM
124 Any major street because it is unsafe to ride with cars 6/22/2014 11:03 AM
125 Traffic lights short timed, fast moving traffic, drivers do not give cyclist the right of way, they honk.6/21/2014 9:44 AM
126 I void most streets 6/20/2014 11:05 PM
127 Rosemead Blvd.6/20/2014 4:13 PM
128 Firestone blvd potholes galore and cracked roads; major traffic; busy.6/19/2014 9:55 PM
129 Telegraph and Florence are tight because I have to take a lane most of the way through Downey.6/19/2014 6:02 PM
130 All of Florence, especially from Old River School Rd. to Woodruff. I feel like drivers take the opportunity to speed on this street,
leaving little room to slow down for bikes on street lanes. Firestone is also very congested in general and it can be a bit of a maze
trying to get through traffic.
6/19/2014 3:34 PM
131 Busy streets, for much traffic and anywhere cars speed to the street from coming out of parking lots or driveways, making it hard to
avoid close calls
6/19/2014 12:32 AM
132 firestone is pretty challenging as well as imperial and florence 6/18/2014 8:07 PM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
14 / 33
133 Streets with no bike lanes are very hard to ride because of unsafe drivers. Getting buzzed where there are no lanes happens all the
time.
6/18/2014 6:41 PM
134 Downey Avenue is very wide and dark when I ride at night 6/18/2014 11:23 AM
135 Paramount Blvd at the On/Off ramp for the I-5. The rapid pace of the cars make it rather dangerous to go down that stretch.
Firestone and Lakewood intersection is quite difficult to bike through due to the heavy traffic by both automobiles and
pedestrians.
6/18/2014 12:13 AM
136 The main avenues and boulevards that connect to smaller streets are always challenging. Paramount, Florence and Lakewood
are not bike friendly. It is difficult to cross from one side of the street to another before going to the next traffic light (and they're
usually far apart). If the city decides to put more traffic lights to solve that problem, it should highly consider synchronizing traffic
lights to avoid additional traffic.
6/17/2014 10:44 PM
137 Firestone Blvd, Imperial Hwy 6/17/2014 10:01 PM
138 turning left from lakewood to bellflower. turning left from lakewood to columbia way.6/17/2014 8:55 PM
139 Intersection of florence and lakewood, horrible pavement. Firestone blvd and imperial hwy - both have bad pavement and no
street signs
6/17/2014 8:46 PM
140 Drivers not willing to share the road and not caring about bikes.6/17/2014 8:21 PM
141 Major intersections, such as Lakewood and Firestone. Freeway under-crossings where cars merge in and out of Freeway ramps.6/17/2014 8:02 PM
142 Imperial - very careless drivers. Have almost been hit on imperial.6/17/2014 5:56 PM
143 Avenues Florence Firestone imperial paramount Lakewood drivers don't respect no bike lanes 6/17/2014 3:42 PM
144 Firestone / traffic 6/17/2014 3:35 PM
145 Paramount Firestone Big streets, lots of construction and traffic 6/17/2014 3:32 PM
146 Everything along Florence, Firestone, Stewart and Gray, and Imperial (travel East and West). Paramount and Lakewood (both
travel north and south) are both wide, and seem like great locations for bike lanes, but vehicle speed, and unmarked space for
bicyclists make it less friendly. These streets are main corridors to attractions around town, and would benefit from some level of
bicycle infrastructure.
6/17/2014 2:27 PM
147 lakewood - no bikelanes and might as well be no sidewalk south of the 105. tree wells and other infrastructure completely blocks
sidewalk and traffic makes it difficult to ride anywhere but the gutter. crossing the 105 is very difficult on foot or bike.
6/17/2014 2:22 PM
148 Florence at the rio san Gabriel bridge by wilderness park. Gallatin and paramount going east. Paramount and Florence.6/16/2014 5:04 PM
149 Firestone traffic 6/14/2014 3:42 PM
150 Lakewood, busy 6/14/2014 3:38 PM
151 Florence 6/14/2014 3:24 PM
152 Firestone 6/14/2014 3:15 PM
153 Big streets. Florence/Firestone/Imperial/Lakewood/Paramount/Gardandale 6/14/2014 3:09 PM
154 Lakewood 6/14/2014 3:09 PM
155 I do not yet know, but info provided by the city would be helpful.6/14/2014 2:59 PM
156 Firestone, Paramount, Lakewood 6/14/2014 2:58 PM
157 Paramount, busy boulevards, under the 5 fwy pass 6/14/2014 2:52 PM
158 Firestone Blvd.6/14/2014 2:46 PM
159 Lakewood blvd 6/14/2014 2:44 PM
160 Lakewood and Imperial - too much traffic for me 6/14/2014 2:41 PM
161 Lakewood, Firestone 6/14/2014 2:36 PM
162 Lakewood and cross streets Paramount and cross streets 6/14/2014 2:29 PM
163 Florence am Florence to imperial 6/14/2014 2:25 PM
164 Lakewood and Firestone 6/14/2014 2:21 PM
165 All the arterials. Driver ignorance.6/14/2014 1:52 PM
166 Firestone 6/14/2014 12:40 PM
167 Old river & Firestone 6/14/2014 12:23 PM
168 Paramount, Florence, Lakewood and imperial and other like busy streets.6/14/2014 12:16 PM
169 All on sidewalk 6/14/2014 12:04 PM
170 Paramount below the freeway needs more lighting 6/14/2014 11:49 AM
171 Imperial hwy 6/14/2014 11:48 AM
172 Imperial highway and Lakewood. Fast traffic speeds and no room for cyclists 6/14/2014 11:28 AM
173 Florence and Firestone because they are uneven 6/14/2014 11:14 AM
174 Major streets esp ones coming off the freeway...6/14/2014 11:02 AM
175 Florence 6/14/2014 10:53 AM
176 Imperial and firestone 6/14/2014 7:17 AM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
15 / 33
Q7 If you were "Bicycling Czar" for a day,
what would you do to make biking in
Downey safer and easier? (You can name
a specific location or project, city-wide
improvements, or an activity or policy.)
Answered: 162 Skipped: 69
#Responses Date
1 Add more street trees everywhere 7/26/2014 10:11 PM
2 all cars on city streets give the right of way to all Bicycling .7/25/2014 9:23 PM
3 Bike lanes on Lakewood Blvd and Firestone Blvd. Map of all and safe routes to Downey Recreation Locations. Well paved streets
and paths.Secure Bike parking stations in view able locations.
7/22/2014 11:00 AM
4 Wider streets with a bike lane 7/21/2014 9:27 PM
5 Design an aggressive "Share the road" campaign, and would have signs prominently displayed throughout the city reminding
drivers that bicyclists have a right to use the roads. I would also educate the police department on how to enforce consistently
laws that protect bicyclists.
7/20/2014 1:57 PM
6 more bike racks with better lighting.7/19/2014 4:57 PM
7 Bicyclists do not obey the traffic laws and cut in and out of traffic, cross against a red light.7/18/2014 10:21 PM
8 Increase police presence and monitoring of gangs and criminal activity along the "river" path in the evenings/nights.7/18/2014 8:23 PM
9 How about a long bike strip path that connects Downeys best attractions like Mall, Parks, Downtown, etc gonna take more than a
day, but I feel we will get there.
7/18/2014 12:30 PM
10 Well advertised bike lanes, easily seen bike lanes by motorists.7/18/2014 12:10 PM
11 A truly MARKED BICYCLE LANE on most major streets as this would encourage more people to come out and ride and hopefully
reduce traffic
7/15/2014 3:43 PM
12 bike lanes 7/15/2014 11:02 AM
13 Have actual bike paths off the street 7/15/2014 10:58 AM
14 I would like to ride for exercise on bike paths where cars are not present 7/15/2014 10:52 AM
15 Educate both drives and cyclists on the laws of the streets 7/15/2014 10:38 AM
16 Bicyclists should be enforced to ride with the flow of traffic and obey all cyclist rules. Distance between cars and bikes should be
enforced.
7/15/2014 10:31 AM
17 Not at the moment 7/15/2014 10:27 AM
18 Protected lanes, signage and education for drivers and cyclists on rules/regulations for both 7/15/2014 10:24 AM
19 Stop the traffic in some major streets only one day a week (Saturday or Sunday)7/15/2014 10:07 AM
20 add bike lanes for safer streets 7/15/2014 9:43 AM
21 More bike lanes 7/15/2014 9:38 AM
22 masked bicycles lanes 7/14/2014 5:05 PM
23 Enforce automotive rules & regulations to make it safer for bikes and pedestrians 7/14/2014 4:57 PM
24 Special bike day (close streets) once a year 7/14/2014 4:49 PM
25 Motorist education 7/12/2014 8:20 PM
26 Enforce traffic laws so motorists cannot harrass cyclists. Put in bike lanes.7/12/2014 11:22 AM
27 More Bike racks 7/12/2014 10:44 AM
28 Make a specific bike route that is separate from traffic, like in Whittier.7/12/2014 10:42 AM
29 Specified bike lanes 7/12/2014 10:32 AM
30 Imperial blvd 7/12/2014 10:12 AM
31 Bike lane on major streets 7/12/2014 10:11 AM
32 Down town Downey 7/12/2014 9:49 AM
33 NO bikes on Firestone or if there's a third car lane, must safely share; no bikes allowed on left turn lanes 7/11/2014 4:08 PM
34 I would take two streets that run north and south and two streets that run east and west and make them into biker friendly roads.
(Bike lanes)
7/11/2014 2:38 PM
35 I would create designated bike routes all through the city accessing all of the locations frequented by citizens.7/11/2014 9:55 AM
36 Build bike lanes 7/11/2014 12:23 AM
37 Enforcement do existing laws: helmets for those under 18, no window tinting on front seat vehicle windows, bicycle safety classes
at all schools for any student that rides their bicycle to and from school and mandatory parent attendance
7/10/2014 11:27 AM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
16 / 33
38 I would do something similar to Long Beach or Los Angeles that has streets that they have allocated a lane specifically for
bicycle traffic. More bicycle lock areas to encourage use. More signs that encourage motorists to share the road. Educating
bicyclist to not ride on sidewalks.
7/10/2014 7:27 AM
39 I would add bike lanes or paths to major streets such as Firestone, Lakewood, Florence, Brookshire, Woodruff, and Pangborn 7/9/2014 11:56 PM
40 I Don't want to be a bike Czar. Just make bike lines and watch unsafe drivers.7/9/2014 9:54 PM
41 Bicycle lanes along Lakewood Blvd. Preferably in the style of Downtown Long Beach (example: http://goo.gl/maps/YBVmO).
Somewhat related, I would also improve Lakewood Blvd north of Florence Ave. This is a rapidly expanding/gentrifying area (new
luxury townhomes just got built at Gallatin road) and the street looks really beat up. No new street lights, no landscaping, nothing
that Lakewood Blvd south of Florence got.
7/9/2014 5:35 PM
42 Lanes. Signs. Street way finder.7/9/2014 4:21 PM
43 I would do what Whittier(lambert rd) did by putting a bike lane alongside the train tracks 7/9/2014 10:33 AM
44 None 7/9/2014 10:16 AM
45 Bike lanes on... - Lakewood Blvd. - Bellflower - Woodruff - maaaybeee Stewart & Gray - lesser chance on Imperial (too fast and
narrow) - For sure on Columbia Way (repave it first) - Rives definitely - Brookshire definitely - Downey Ave definitely (at least before
and after the downtown area, too narrow) - Old River is a MUST, it's so wide I'd also make a clear bike path end to end on Cecilia.
It's the one neighborhood St that goes end to end, and can connect the bike trails on the riverbeds. I would put more bike-friendly
banners and signs, educate drivers through billboards and signs (Downey is your bike lane), send out letters to all homes about
bicycle laws, offer educational classes for all cyclists, led by riders in the city that know their stuff (like me!), biking infrastructure
(parking), get the Downey Bike Coalition recognized more, have them offer more community rides, geared for kids and adults.
7/9/2014 10:12 AM
46 Beautify and make safe the dry/empty and trashy land along the rivers to make that path more appealing and safe for bike riders.
Use the land along the rivers in the Downey boundaries to create parks and install facilities for bikers and families to stop and rest
along the way.
7/9/2014 9:23 AM
47 Why cant Downey have a nice bike/walk path like most city's 7/9/2014 9:06 AM
48 Definitely install bike lanes on the busier streets.7/9/2014 8:44 AM
49 create dedicated bike lanes 7/9/2014 8:36 AM
50 Bike lanes 7/8/2014 9:10 PM
51 Create wide bike lanes on our major streets (Firestone, Florence, paramount, Lakewood).7/8/2014 9:02 PM
52 Make a raised bike line to keep cyclists away from cars would be awesome. Just my imagination though...7/8/2014 9:01 PM
53 I would add bike lanes on major streets. I would start with bike lanes in downtown Downey, Firestone and Downey Ave. to show the
community that our city wants to be bike friendly it will also promote / encourage our residents to ride their bike around town.
7/8/2014 6:55 PM
54 have volunteers on high traffic areas where motorist don't stop for ppl or bicyclist. and give them tix for it.7/8/2014 6:48 PM
55 Resurface streets, add bicycle lanes 7/8/2014 6:16 PM
56 Have everyone participate in an all-bike day to encourage as many people to ride their bikes that day and to "stay local" if
possible by working from home.
7/8/2014 5:17 PM
57 If I were a Bicycling Czar, I would do what L.A. does every few times a year. Have a Ciclovia. Close parts of major streets
designate it for people and bikes only, have everyone enjoy Downey's beauty. I would also paint bike lanes on Imperial, Firestone
and Florence and continue to have weekly bike rides that are less than 40 miles so more families can participate.
7/8/2014 3:50 PM
58 We need bike lanes 7/8/2014 2:42 PM
59 Bike lanes on all major streets.7/8/2014 1:58 PM
60 Bike lanes or bike-designated paths on major streets like Firestone, Imperial, Florence, Paramount 7/8/2014 12:37 PM
61 bike lines. And a biking awareness campaign 7/8/2014 12:37 PM
62 Install greener parks with bike/walking paths and a destination like huge lake to stop and rest and resume biking 7/8/2014 12:31 PM
63 Implement bike lanes on major streets.7/8/2014 12:21 PM
64 I would have dedicated bike paths that connected Treasure Island, Dennis the Menace, Furman, Wilderness and Apollo parks. I
would have bike lanes on Paramount Blvd., Florence Av., Firestone Blvd and Downey Av.
7/8/2014 11:42 AM
65 Adding bike lanes and putting up Bike awareness Sings!!7/8/2014 11:29 AM
66 Add more lights and have a bike route safe to Downtown Downey and/or local parks for children to bike.7/8/2014 11:15 AM
67 Dedicated bike paths and overpasses. Safety is also as important 7/8/2014 11:15 AM
68 I would actually love to see bike stops where one can use public tools such as wrenches, air pumps, etc.7/8/2014 11:11 AM
69 Adding addition bike lanes through all our cities major sites. Town town Downey, landing, near parks, and towards the transit.7/8/2014 10:43 AM
70 I think thy should make bike lanes 7/8/2014 10:41 AM
71 Make bike lanes along with having more bike family fun days.7/8/2014 10:20 AM
72 Bike lane and share the road signs.7/8/2014 10:12 AM
73 Crime is the biggest deterrent. I would have riding groups that could bike safely together. I would also allow bicyclists on sidewalks
given they respect pedestrians as well.
7/8/2014 10:11 AM
74 Enforce the rules of the road for motorist and bicyclist.7/8/2014 10:07 AM
75 I would add biking trails at all parks for kids to ride on.7/8/2014 10:01 AM
76 Off the path bike lanes 7/8/2014 9:47 AM
77 Add Bike lanes 7/8/2014 9:44 AM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
17 / 33
78 Ensure that cyclists have biking lights (front and rear) to make themselves more visible to motorists, as well as helmets (they're a
MUST). Designated bike lanes/routes that would not inhibit flow of traffic on major streets.
7/8/2014 9:29 AM
79 I would probably fix the problem I have in #6 by making the sidewalks much wider so as to accommodate both cyclists and
pedestrians. Making a bike lane would mean construction and that's incredibly annoying being a driver myself as well. I would
also put sidewalks on streets that don't have sidewalks and I would put ramps on all curb corners (because that's also a nuance
when cycling).
7/7/2014 10:54 PM
80 Lower speed limits by 10 mph on larger streets and by 5 mph on residential streets 7/7/2014 10:43 PM
81 Desiganted bike lanes, reduce the speed limit on main streets, Better the streetlights throughout the city.7/7/2014 10:26 PM
82 Dedicated bike lanes toward all public parks 7/7/2014 10:20 PM
83 Creat a green painted bike path that safely runs east west from san gabriel rive all the way to the LA river, connecting the two in a
safe way though downey.
7/6/2014 8:51 PM
84 The more bike lanes and bike racks are available the more we will see people use them.7/6/2014 11:34 AM
85 I don't know 7/6/2014 10:59 AM
86 I would add some fun routes within the city and post them in various points throughout.7/6/2014 10:17 AM
87 I would get bike lanes all Firestone and Florence. And make more events and rides for the community.7/6/2014 10:02 AM
88 A grid system of designated bikeways with 3 to 4 east/west and the same north/south including dedicated routes between the Rio
Hondo and San Gabriel river paths. We also obviously need racks throughout town to lock bikes to preferably with nearby benches
to rest.
7/6/2014 8:37 AM
89 I would love Firestone to be more bike friendly. You have great destinations there. Also, other streets I would love bike friendly
policies is Stewart and Grey & Imperial. To make this happen I would have better lightning and bike lanes on these streets.
7/3/2014 10:02 PM
90 "Shares" bike lane - similar to what the city of Long Beach implemented on 2nd Street and other locations in that city.7/3/2014 11:49 AM
91 I will give thee bike lanes so one can get around better & a nice bike path for your pure enjoyment without the worries of traffic
which can be shared with runners, roller bladders, & skaters alike just like most beach cities & many inland cities that embrace a
healthy & outdoor community.
7/2/2014 8:08 PM
92 Make sure all crosswalk buttons, signals and detection are set to include bicyclists 7/2/2014 6:38 PM
93 bike lanes as much as possible.7/2/2014 5:04 PM
94 more bike paths 7/2/2014 4:11 PM
95 Would educate both drivers and bicyclists on traffic laws. People on bicycles are not exempt from stopping at stop signs.7/2/2014 3:24 PM
96 I would make at least 2 major streets in both directions (Firestone & Florence or Imperial, and Lakewood and Paramount) have a
bicycle lane that is painted green (as in helping our environment) so that cyclists of all types can get to and from the main
attractions like the mall, downtown, parks, etc. I would also put up a few poster boards or signs that say watch for cyclists. Share
the road. Pass with care. 3 ft is the law. Etc.
7/2/2014 3:09 PM
97 Definitely bike lanes will make it safer. Also, making routes for those that like to use their bicycles.7/2/2014 2:34 PM
98 Have motorist slow down and a seperate lane.7/2/2014 12:28 PM
99 I would create a bicycle lane. Not just intended for exercise but for transportation purposes. I would want to get to and from local
stores and restaurants everyday. I would also create a parking location for bikes watched by security or attendant. (you asked haha)
7/2/2014 11:50 AM
100 Teach drivers about bikers rights/biking laws.7/2/2014 11:19 AM
101 In order to make biking safer and easier in Downey, I would definitely add bike lanes and possibly even paths that are designated
for only bikers. Also include sharrows and signage to inform drivers about bikers.
6/29/2014 3:25 PM
102 Put more bike racks at buisness and cameras on them for safty. I've had 2 bikes stolen we need to make it harder to steel them.6/28/2014 2:21 PM
103 Bike lane/path that connects riverbeds (Cecilia, all the way through). Lakewood Blvd., Gallatin, Brookshire, Stewart & Grey, Old
River, would all have a bike path or lane. Firestone and Florence are too fast too slow down and it might not be worth it. But the
other streets seem doable in my opinion.
6/26/2014 4:11 PM
104 Bike lanes on all major streeets, Dedicated bike paths to the Train stations. More bike lockers or monitored bike racks at the metro
transit stations.
6/25/2014 11:03 AM
105 I would like to have more days to ride bikes 6/23/2014 1:32 PM
106 Cyclists and walkers to wear one ear piece, for music must keep available to hear warnings from others 6/23/2014 1:24 PM
107 i'm not sure, but Long Beach has great bike lanes.6/23/2014 1:19 PM
108 sharrows on all major streets 6/23/2014 1:10 PM
109 Saturday 6/23/2014 1:07 PM
110 Mimic Long Beach bike system.6/23/2014 11:58 AM
111 Put in bike lanes and make bike freeways 6/23/2014 11:54 AM
112 Have bike trails at all parks with safe routes through nearest neighborhoods. Also safe designated bike lanes or paths to both river
beds.
6/22/2014 11:03 AM
113 Place a green bike lane separated from traffic, not shared along Florence (there a lot of cyclist travelling already but traffic is fast
moving and dangerous) and on Firestone.) connecting nearby cities. I would connect all the parks with green bike lanes that are
not shared. I would also create a green bike path with nature where families can explore being outdoors more often. Also, Downey
is extremely plane, it would be nice to make hills in parks or nature areas.
6/21/2014 9:44 AM
114 long term - devlop master plan to have bike lanes on all major streets. Short term provide signs about shaaring the road and
having a map that support biking through Downey.
6/20/2014 11:05 PM
115 Fix potholes - Can't stress enough! Share the road signs as reminders. Police on bikes. Cycling team at high schools.6/19/2014 9:55 PM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
18 / 33
116 I would add bike lanes on Telegraph. There are few East/West cycling options.6/19/2014 6:02 PM
117 I would designate 5th street and maybe even Stewart & Gray as the official main bike lanes going East to West and West to East
because there is less traffic on these streets and they are located between Firestone, Florence and Imperial Hwy. I would then add
bike lanes running North and South on all major intersections (Old River School Road, Paramount, Brookshire, Lakewood,
Woodruff) covering the city of Downey.
6/19/2014 3:34 PM
118 I am new to the area but everywhere I could I would put protected lanes. With curbs and parking spaces to separate the bikes and
peds. Where we can't have those then just regular bike lanes. Some sort of separation.
6/18/2014 6:41 PM
119 Pubic awareness of inattentive drivers and the impact it can/does have on cyclists and pedestrians. Examining most common
cycling routes and then reducing speeds, insuring bike lanes are wide, possible sharrows, signage advising of the 3 feet law and
strict enforcement and stiff penalties for violators.
6/18/2014 4:04 PM
120 More free biking events, implementation of bike lanes, and more road maintenance to avoid bicycle flats 6/18/2014 11:23 AM
121 The best way would be to put some designated bike lanes on major streets that are frequented by people to get to either
Stonewood Mall, or the Downey Landing shopping centers.
6/18/2014 12:13 AM
122 I would raise awareness to drivers, transients and residents by using all types of media available (online: facebook, city website,
instagram, newspapers: local and nearby cities and hang banners all over the main avenues and boulevards).
6/17/2014 10:44 PM
123 Downey bike day in the style of Ciclavia to promote bicycling as a lifestyle.6/17/2014 10:01 PM
124 repave firestone and create bike lanes on florence, firestone, and imperial. Also on paramount and lakewood. Add share the road
signs on major streets.
6/17/2014 8:55 PM
125 The bridge on firestone blvd over the San Gabriel trail, heading south, is really narrow, cars are going very fast and the south side
of the bridge is in very bad shape, PLEASE FIX IT! Also, there seem to be more and more homeless ppl under the bridges, this is
discouraging for families and females
6/17/2014 8:46 PM
126 I would make the land next to railroad tracks a bike route, seen this in most cities and very successful. Keep it lit properly for bikes
and pedestrians. But have a designated bike lane there too. Major roads in Downey, instead of island style medians use the space
for bike lanes instead.
6/17/2014 8:21 PM
127 Have police set up bicycle check points, like salubrity check points, and stop cyclist breaking the law and cite and or educate
them on correct way to ride on the streets.
6/17/2014 8:02 PM
128 Bike lanes!!!6/17/2014 5:56 PM
129 Bike lanes even south l.a has them what's happening Downey 6/17/2014 3:42 PM
130 support, fund and fulfill the DBC's bike plan create more designated bike lanes 6/17/2014 3:32 PM
131 I think Downey Ave in the downtown area (1 lane of traffic each way) would benefit greatly from a treatment similar to what is seen
on 2nd street in Long Beach. Lots of bike parking, and a green lane/sharrow through a slow traffic area, to get people out of their
cars and on their bikes to explore the growing retail/eateries found there. Given that most homes are within 1.5 miles of the City
Center, there should be no reason for people to drive that distance. It would be great to see some innovative planning, and for
Downey to take the lead as an early adopter of Cycletracks in LA County. I could see them be great additions to major corridors
such as Lakewood, much like the City of Rosemead has done. Also, it would be great to see the City adopt a Safe Routes to
School Plan or policy given the amount of traffic that surrounds the small streets along most of the towns elementary and middle
schools. Most of these campuses are outfitted with large bicycle cages, that used to be full, as the average student is within a half
mile from their campus. it would be a great way to improve health, and decrease congestion in our neighborhoods.
6/17/2014 2:27 PM
132 dedicated class 1 bike lanes on lakewood, imperial, firestone, paramount, and florence; Class 2 bikeways on tier 2 streets (s&g,
downey, brookshire, etc); coordinate bikeway improvements with stormwater/LID improvements; DON'T IGNORE SOUTH DOWNEY
when planning improvements; bike hub/amenities at Metro green line station
6/17/2014 2:22 PM
133 Make two streets running north & south & two streets running east & west with designated bike lanes.6/16/2014 5:04 PM
134 Bike lane on Firestone set path through city highlighting Commerce 6/14/2014 3:42 PM
135 Class I Bike path 6/14/2014 3:38 PM
136 Have police checkpoints to look for aggressive drivers 6/14/2014 3:24 PM
137 North Downey 6/14/2014 3:15 PM
138 Bike lanes!!6/14/2014 3:09 PM
139 Put bike lanes on all major streets 6/14/2014 3:09 PM
140 I do not yet know.6/14/2014 2:59 PM
141 Make room for bikes on Firestone and Florence 6/14/2014 2:58 PM
142 exclusive bike lanes 6/14/2014 2:52 PM
143 City parks have bike routes 6/14/2014 2:46 PM
144 Downey landing,have safer bike lanes, more bike n running contests 6/14/2014 2:44 PM
145 Bike path would be nice 6/14/2014 2:41 PM
146 Ad bike track or remove bums 6/14/2014 2:36 PM
147 Established bike paths 6/14/2014 2:29 PM
148 Add bike track 6/14/2014 2:21 PM
149 Stripe bike lanes the full length of Firestone, Imperial, Florence, and Gallatin.6/14/2014 1:52 PM
150 Slow down traffis 6/14/2014 12:40 PM
151 Slow vehicles 6/14/2014 12:36 PM
152 Educate people about bicycling 6/14/2014 12:23 PM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
19 / 33
153 Add bike lanes, bike routes and have a printed and downloadable map of such routes.6/14/2014 12:16 PM
154 Sidewalks everywhere like near coca cola with room for bikes 6/14/2014 12:04 PM
155 Close streets for riding events 6/14/2014 11:49 AM
156 Establish a Primary North-South and East-West cycle track that cuts thru the city. Secondary corridors Class II 6/14/2014 11:48 AM
157 Cycle track on major roads like paramount, Lakewood, and Firestone blvd 6/14/2014 11:28 AM
158 Encourage safety by giving free helmets are something promoting the benefits of cycling 6/14/2014 11:14 AM
159 Safe, dedicated lanes 6/14/2014 11:02 AM
160 More promotion of cycling 6/14/2014 10:53 AM
161 Bike parking, bike lanes protected by parked cars 6/14/2014 10:35 AM
162 More bike lanes 6/14/2014 7:17 AM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
20 / 33
Q8 What’s the nearest major intersection to
your residence?
Answered: 188 Skipped: 43
#Responses Date
1 Florence and Paramount 7/26/2014 10:12 PM
2 Flornce and Paramount Bl.7/25/2014 9:24 PM
3 Florence & Woodruff 7/22/2014 10:56 AM
4 Imperial paramount 7/21/2014 9:28 PM
5 Paramount and Imperial 7/20/2014 1:59 PM
6 Firestone and Old River 7/18/2014 10:21 PM
7 Lakewood and Florance 7/18/2014 9:16 PM
8 Florence Ave and Paramount Blvd.7/18/2014 8:24 PM
9 Suva/ Paramount 7/18/2014 4:17 PM
10 lakewood & gallatin 7/18/2014 12:31 PM
11 Paramount and Imperial 7/15/2014 3:44 PM
12 Florence and Telegraph 7/15/2014 11:03 AM
13 Paramount and 5th St.7/15/2014 10:59 AM
14 Paramount and 5th St.7/15/2014 10:53 AM
15 Paramount & 70th in Long Beach 7/15/2014 10:44 AM
16 Firestone and Woodruff 7/15/2014 10:38 AM
17 Firestone and Woodruff 7/15/2014 10:32 AM
18 Downey Avenue 7/15/2014 10:27 AM
19 Alamada/Lakewood 7/15/2014 10:25 AM
20 Florence and Paramount 7/15/2014 10:08 AM
21 Florence 7/15/2014 9:46 AM
22 Lakewood 7/15/2014 9:43 AM
23 Imperial Highway 7/15/2014 9:39 AM
24 Florence and Paramount 7/14/2014 5:11 PM
25 Stewart and Gray 7/14/2014 5:06 PM
26 Rives and Stewart and Gray 7/14/2014 5:02 PM
27 Stewart and Gray at Rives 7/14/2014 4:57 PM
28 Firestone 7/14/2014 4:51 PM
29 Florence downey 7/13/2014 8:58 PM
30 Old river school & Stewart & gray 7/12/2014 8:21 PM
31 Paramount and Florence 7/12/2014 11:23 AM
32 5th st 7/12/2014 10:52 AM
33 Paramount and Florence 7/12/2014 10:45 AM
34 Paramount and Florence 7/12/2014 10:43 AM
35 Firestone/reina 7/12/2014 10:33 AM
36 Downey landing to Lakewood 7/12/2014 10:12 AM
37 Firestone blvd.7/12/2014 9:23 AM
38 Old river and Florence 7/11/2014 11:40 PM
39 Florence/Woodruff 7/11/2014 4:08 PM
40 Gallatin and paramount 7/11/2014 2:39 PM
41 Paramount/Washington 7/11/2014 2:31 PM
42 Firestone and Woodruff 7/11/2014 9:56 AM
43 Gallatin and Lakewood 7/11/2014 12:24 AM
44 Stewart and Gray/Old River School 7/10/2014 11:28 AM
45 Downey/5th St 7/10/2014 7:28 AM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
21 / 33
46 Firestone/Pangborne 7/9/2014 11:57 PM
47 paramount/florence 7/9/2014 11:43 PM
48 Old river & Stewart and gray 7/9/2014 10:37 PM
49 Lakewood blvd 7/9/2014 9:55 PM
50 Florence & Lakewood 7/9/2014 5:36 PM
51 Paramount and imperial 7/9/2014 4:22 PM
52 Imperial, Paramount 7/9/2014 11:32 AM
53 Firestone 7/9/2014 10:16 AM
54 Paramount Blvd. & Florence Ave.7/9/2014 10:13 AM
55 Paramount Blvd 7/9/2014 9:07 AM
56 Paramount and Florence 7/9/2014 8:45 AM
57 Paramount Blvd/Galatin 7/9/2014 8:37 AM
58 brookshire & gallatin 7/8/2014 10:30 PM
59 Lakewood and firestone 7/8/2014 9:11 PM
60 Florence & Paramount 7/8/2014 9:04 PM
61 Lakewood/Imperial 7/8/2014 9:02 PM
62 Imperial / paramount 7/8/2014 6:56 PM
63 paramount and imperial or imperial and firestone 7/8/2014 6:49 PM
64 florance and lakewood 7/8/2014 6:17 PM
65 3rd Street and Downey Avenue 7/8/2014 5:18 PM
66 Imperial Hwy.7/8/2014 3:50 PM
67 Paramount and stewart & gray 7/8/2014 3:15 PM
68 Paramount and Florence 7/8/2014 2:47 PM
69 Florence/Paramount 7/8/2014 2:43 PM
70 Old River School Road and Florence Ave 7/8/2014 2:03 PM
71 Old River School Rd. and Firestone Blvd.7/8/2014 12:38 PM
72 Old river school and firestone 7/8/2014 12:38 PM
73 Firestone and woodruff 7/8/2014 12:33 PM
74 Florence & Lakewood 7/8/2014 12:22 PM
75 Imperial and old river 7/8/2014 12:18 PM
76 Firestone and Paramount 7/8/2014 12:14 PM
77 Paramount Blvd and Florence Av.7/8/2014 11:44 AM
78 Gallatain and paramount 7/8/2014 11:31 AM
79 Firestone and Lakewood 7/8/2014 11:30 AM
80 Imperial Hwy and Bellflower Blvd 7/8/2014 11:16 AM
81 Lakewood and gallatin 7/8/2014 11:16 AM
82 Firestone and Paramount Blvd 7/8/2014 11:12 AM
83 Downey ave and Alameda 7/8/2014 10:44 AM
84 Imperial and brookshire 7/8/2014 10:42 AM
85 Lake wood and Imperial 7/8/2014 10:29 AM
86 Firestone and Stewart and grey/ old river school rd.7/8/2014 10:21 AM
87 paramount and imperial 7/8/2014 10:14 AM
88 Paramount and Florence 7/8/2014 10:12 AM
89 Firestone and brookshire 7/8/2014 10:08 AM
90 Florence and Paramount 7/8/2014 10:02 AM
91 Downey Ave, Gateway 7/8/2014 9:47 AM
92 Firestone 7/8/2014 9:45 AM
93 Stewart and Gray Rd & Old River School Rd.7/8/2014 9:31 AM
94 Paramount blvd & suva st 7/8/2014 1:03 AM
95 Stewart and Grey and Old River School Rd 7/7/2014 10:55 PM
96 Old River School Road and Firestone.7/7/2014 10:45 PM
97 Stewart and Grey / old school river road 7/7/2014 10:27 PM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
22 / 33
98 Paramount 7/7/2014 10:21 PM
99 Paramount/Florence 7/7/2014 10:15 PM
100 i live in long beach, work at Kaiser downey, imperial and bellflower 7/6/2014 8:52 PM
101 Stewart and gray and old river school road 7/6/2014 11:35 AM
102 Don't remember the name 7/6/2014 10:59 AM
103 Downey Ave.7/6/2014 10:20 AM
104 Florence 7/6/2014 10:04 AM
105 Firestone Blvd X Old River School Rd.7/6/2014 8:38 AM
106 Firestone 7/3/2014 10:03 PM
107 Bellflower Blvd and Imperial Highway 7/3/2014 11:49 AM
108 Firestone 7/3/2014 9:26 AM
109 Gallatin and Brookshire 7/2/2014 9:08 PM
110 Stewart & Gray Rd. + Downey ave.7/2/2014 8:10 PM
111 Paramount and Firestone 7/2/2014 6:54 PM
112 Paramount 7/2/2014 6:39 PM
113 I live out of the city and commute in daily from los Alamitos I grew up in downey and rode all over the place not sure I would let
me kid do that now too much traffic
7/2/2014 5:05 PM
114 Bellflower and Imperial Hwy 7/2/2014 4:12 PM
115 Brookshire and Firestone 7/2/2014 3:32 PM
116 Florence and Lakewood 7/2/2014 3:25 PM
117 Firestone and Old River School Rd.7/2/2014 3:10 PM
118 Lakewood 7/2/2014 2:35 PM
119 I live outside Downey 7/2/2014 12:29 PM
120 Florence & Paramount 6/30/2014 12:41 PM
121 Lakewood and Florence 6/29/2014 3:26 PM
122 Paramount & Stewart and Gray / Downey ave. & Firestone / Stewart and Gray & Lakewood 6/28/2014 2:22 PM
123 Imperial and Woodruff 6/25/2014 11:04 AM
124 Stewart and Gray and Paramount 6/23/2014 1:33 PM
125 Norwalk Blvd 6/23/2014 1:30 PM
126 Slauson/Atlantic 6/23/2014 1:24 PM
127 Paramount and Florence 6/23/2014 1:19 PM
128 7th/La Reina 6/23/2014 1:11 PM
129 Downey Ave 6/23/2014 1:07 PM
130 Washington/Paramount 6/23/2014 11:59 AM
131 School 6/23/2014 11:54 AM
132 old river school Rd. and Firestone 6/22/2014 11:04 AM
133 Lakewood & Florence, Firestone and Woodruff Woodruff and Florence 6/21/2014 9:45 AM
134 florence and mattock ave.6/20/2014 11:06 PM
135 Paramount and Washington 6/20/2014 4:14 PM
136 Firestone and rives ave 6/19/2014 9:56 PM
137 Telegraph and Orr & Day 6/19/2014 6:03 PM
138 Paramount/Firestone 6/19/2014 3:35 PM
139 Lakewood and Gallatin 6/19/2014 12:33 AM
140 paramount 6/18/2014 8:08 PM
141 Bellflower and Imperal 6/18/2014 6:44 PM
142 Downey/Paramount 6/18/2014 11:24 AM
143 Paramount & Telegraph 6/18/2014 12:14 AM
144 Paramount / Gallatin / Suva 6/17/2014 10:46 PM
145 Old River/Stewart & Gray 6/17/2014 10:02 PM
146 firestone and rives 6/17/2014 8:57 PM
147 Firestone blvd and woodroof ave 6/17/2014 8:47 PM
148 Bellflower and streward and gray 6/17/2014 8:22 PM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
23 / 33
149 Wahington and Pioneer Blvd.6/17/2014 8:04 PM
150 Imperial - paramount 6/17/2014 5:57 PM
151 Paramount imperial 6/17/2014 3:43 PM
152 Firestone / Garfield 6/17/2014 3:36 PM
153 paramount/birchcrest 6/17/2014 3:33 PM
154 Gallatin and Paramount 6/17/2014 2:28 PM
155 Rosecrans/Lakewood 6/17/2014 2:23 PM
156 Gallatin and paramount 6/16/2014 5:05 PM
157 Firestone/Paramount 6/14/2014 3:43 PM
158 Studebaker/Alondra 6/14/2014 3:38 PM
159 Florence/Old River School 6/14/2014 3:29 PM
160 Florence 6/14/2014 3:26 PM
161 Imperial/Paramount 6/14/2014 3:10 PM
162 Lakewood and Firestone 6/14/2014 3:10 PM
163 I do not live in Downey.6/14/2014 3:00 PM
164 Firestone/Paramount 6/14/2014 2:59 PM
165 Paramount, Vista Del Rosa 6/14/2014 2:53 PM
166 Firestone/Downey Ave/Paramount 6/14/2014 2:47 PM
167 Florence n paramount 6/14/2014 2:46 PM
168 Lakewood and Foster Rd.6/14/2014 2:42 PM
169 Gallatin/Lakewood 6/14/2014 2:38 PM
170 Woodcrest/Firestone 6/14/2014 2:30 PM
171 Lakewood/imperail 6/14/2014 2:27 PM
172 Gallatin and Lakewood 6/14/2014 2:22 PM
173 Firestone paramount 6/14/2014 2:11 PM
174 Paramount & Florence 6/14/2014 2:10 PM
175 Firestone and Paramount.6/14/2014 1:53 PM
176 Old river school road 6/14/2014 12:41 PM
177 Tweedy and suva 6/14/2014 12:37 PM
178 Florence and Rives Ave.6/14/2014 12:18 PM
179 Downey and alameda 6/14/2014 12:06 PM
180 Paramount and Florence 6/14/2014 11:58 AM
181 Florence downey 6/14/2014 11:55 AM
182 Imperial 6/14/2014 11:50 AM
183 Paramount 6/14/2014 11:50 AM
184 Imperial hwy 6/14/2014 11:29 AM
185 Florence and Firestone 6/14/2014 11:15 AM
186 Paramount and gallatin 6/14/2014 10:36 AM
187 Firestone and Wiley burke 6/14/2014 10:29 AM
188 Garden dale and lakewood 6/14/2014 7:17 AM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
24 / 33
0.93%2
1.40%3
21.50%46
24.30%52
21.03%45
15.89%34
9.81%21
4.21%9
0.93%2
Q9 How old are you?
Answered: 214 Skipped: 17
Total 214
Under
12
years
old
12-18
years
old
19-25
years
old
26-35
years
old
36-45
years
old
46-55
years
old
56-65
years
old
66-75
years
old
Over
75
years
old
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Answer Choices Responses
Under 12 years old
12-18 years old
19-25 years old
26-35 years old
36-45 years old
46-55 years old
56-65 years old
66-75 years old
Over 75 years old
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
25 / 33
41.71%88
54.03%114
4.27%9
Q10 What is your gender?
Answered: 211 Skipped: 20
Total 211
Female
Male
Prefer not to
answer
Answer Choices Responses
Female
Male
Prefer not to answer
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
26 / 33
1.91%4
11.48%24
86.60%181
Q11 Are you a student in Downey?
Answered: 209 Skipped: 22
Total 209
Yes, K-12
Yes, College
No, I'm not a
student
Answer Choices Responses
Yes, K-12
Yes, College
No, I'm not a student
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey
27 / 33
28.50%59
71.50%148
Q12 Are you the parent or guardian of a
student in Downey?
Answered: 207 Skipped: 24
Total 207
Yes
No
Answer Choices Responses
Yes
No
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey - Español
1 / 15
66.67%2
33.33%1
0.00%0
0.00%0
0.00%0
Q1 ¿Cuál de las siguientes opciones
describe mejor cómo se siente acerca de
andar en bicicleta en las calles en
Downey?
Answered: 3 Skipped: 1
Total 3
Me interesa,
pero tengo...
Me paseo con
regularidad,...
No me interesa
de ninguna...
Estoy cómodo
andando en...
No sé cómo
andar en...
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Answer Choices Responses
Me interesa, pero tengo preocupaciones, por lo tanto nunca o rara vez ando en mi bicicleta en las calles.
Me paseo con regularidad, pero prefiero instalaciones dedicadas tales como carriles y caminos para bicicleta.
No me interesa de ninguna manera y no monto mi bicicleta en las calles.
Estoy cómodo andando en cualquier calle y prefiero la ruta más directa.
No sé cómo andar en bicicleta, pero estaría interesado en aprender.
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey - Español
2 / 15
Q2 ¿Con qué frecuencia usted anda en
bicicleta…
Answered: 3 Skipped: 1
33.33%
1
0.00%
0
66.67%
2
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
3
33.33%
1
0.00%
0
66.67%
2
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
3
0.00%
0
33.33%
1
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
66.67%
2
3
0.00%
0
33.33%
1
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
66.67%
2
3
Todos los días Unas cuantas veces a la semana Unas cuantas veces al mes
Unas cuantas veces al año Nunca
…en Downey
como su...
…en Downey
por
diversión o...
…fuera de
Downey?
…para tomar
transporte?...
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Todos los
días
Unas cuantas veces a la
semana
Unas cuantas veces
al mes
Unas cuantas veces
al año
NuncaTotal
…en Downey como su transporte? (a la escuela, el trabajo o
hacer encargos)
…en Downey por diversión o ejercicio? (en el parque, etc.)
…fuera de Downey?
…para tomar transporte? (por ejemplo, Downey Link o
autobús de Metro o tren)
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey - Español
3 / 15
100.00%3
66.67%2
66.67%2
33.33%1
33.33%1
0.00%0
0.00%0
0.00%0
0.00%0
0.00%0
0.00%0
0.00%0
0.00%0
Q3 A continuación están algunos posibles
obstáculos para el ciclismo. En su opinión,
¿estos obstáculos desaniman a la gente
para andar en bicicleta en Downey?
(Puede seleccionar más de uno.)
Answered: 3 Skipped: 1
Total Respondents: 3
No hay
carriles par...
Los carros
estacionados...
No hay
estacionamie...
El exceso de
velocidad o...
Las calles son
demasiado...
Servicio de
transporte...
Las distancias
entre los...
Pocas o
ningunas...
Colinas
empinadas
Preocupaciones
acerca de la...
Simplemente no
me gusta and...
Prefiero
manejar
Prefiero
caminar
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Answer Choices Responses
No hay carriles para bicicleta
Los carros estacionados presentan un peligro para mí
No hay estacionamiento para bicicletas
El exceso de velocidad o conducir agresivamente
Las calles son demasiado anchas o muy ocupadas
Servicio de transporte inadecuado (o de lo contrario podría andar en bicicleta para usar transporte)
Las distancias entre los destinos son demasiado largos
Pocas o ningunas comodidades (como fuentes de agua, botes de basura, etc.)
Colinas empinadas
Preocupaciones acerca de la delincuencia
Simplemente no me gusta andar en bicicleta
Prefiero manejar
Prefiero caminar
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey - Español
4 / 15
Total Respondents: 3
#Otro (especifique)Date
There are no responses.
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey - Español
5 / 15
Q4 A continuación están algunas maneras
de mejorar las condiciones para los
ciclistas. En general, ¿qué importancia
cree usted que estas son para Downey?
Answered: 3 Skipped: 1
100.00%
3
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
3
33.33%
1
33.33%
1
33.33%
1
3
66.67%
2
33.33%
1
0.00%
0
3
66.67%
2
0.00%
0
33.33%
1
3
0.00%
0
100.00%
2
0.00%
0
2
50.00%
1
50.00%
1
0.00%
0
2
Muy importante Algo importante No es importante
Carriles para
bicicletas e...
Caminos para
bicicletas...
Caminos para
bicicletas...
Calles de
vecindario
q...
Tráfico de
vehículos
má...
Más destinos
(lugares par...
Estacionamiento
para bicicle...
Mayor
aplicación
d...
Más servicio
de transport...
Calles muy
bien...
Más tiempo
en
semáforos
pa...
Clases donde
pueda
aprend...
Educación
para
los...
Un mapa de
la
ciudad...
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Muy
importante
Algo
importante
No es
importante
Total
Carriles para bicicletas en calles muy transitadas
Caminos para bicicletas completamente separados del tráfico y de la calle
Caminos para bicicletas sobre la calle, pero separado del tráfico por coches estacionados o un bordillo
Calles de vecindario que dan prioridad a las bicicletas y a los peatones por medio de la reducción del tráfico y
velocidades de vehículos
Tráfico de vehículos más lento el en las calles principales
Más destinos (lugares para salir)en mi vecindario
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey - Español
6 / 15
100.00%
3
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
3
100.00%
3
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
3
33.33%
1
33.33%
1
33.33%
1
3
33.33%
1
0.00%
0
66.67%
2
3
33.33%
1
33.33%
1
33.33%
1
3
66.67%
2
33.33%
1
0.00%
0
3
66.67%
2
33.33%
1
0.00%
0
3
100.00%
3
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
3
66.67%
2
0.00%
0
33.33%
1
3
#Otro (especifique)Date
There are no responses.
Estacionamiento para bicicletas o casilleros para bicicletas
Mayor aplicación de las leyes de tráficos (por ejemplo, exceso de velocidad, no detenerse, rebasar con seguridad)
Más servicio de transporte ( yo andaría en bicicleta hasta/de transporte)
Calles muy bien ajardinadas
Más tiempo en semáforos para cruzar las calles
Más o mejores luces de la calle
Clases donde pueda aprender habilidades para andar en bicicleta y mantenimiento de bicicletas
Educación para los automovilistas explicando los derechos de los ciclistas
Un mapa de la ciudad mostrando las rutas recomendadas y destinos/lugares populares
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey - Español
7 / 15
Q5 ¿Cuáles son sus lugares o rutas
favoritas para andar en bicicleta en
Downey? ¿Por qué?
Answered: 0 Skipped: 4
#Responses Date
There are no responses.
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey - Español
8 / 15
Q6 ¿Cuáles son algunas de las calles o
intersecciones más difíciles para andar en
bicicleta? ¿Por qué?
Answered: 1 Skipped: 3
#Responses Date
1 Florence and paramount 7/8/2014 11:35 AM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey - Español
9 / 15
Q7 Si usted fuera "Gobernador de
Ciclismo" por un día, ¿qué haría para hacer
el ciclismo en Downey más seguro y más
fácil? (Usted puede nombrar a un lugar o
un proyecto específico, mejoras en toda la
ciudad, una actividad o una política.)
Answered: 2 Skipped: 2
#Responses Date
1 Pondria mas senalamientos 7/8/2014 11:35 AM
2 Que Los ciclistas respete las leyes de trafico.6/14/2014 12:58 PM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey - Español
10 / 15
Q8 ¿Cuáles son las calles principal más
cercana a su casa?
Answered: 3 Skipped: 1
#Responses Date
1 clark and foster 7/8/2014 11:36 AM
2 Firestone, Stewart & gray 7/6/2014 4:49 PM
3 Imperial y Downey 6/14/2014 12:59 PM
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey - Español
11 / 15
0.00%0
0.00%0
0.00%0
0.00%0
66.67%2
33.33%1
0.00%0
0.00%0
0.00%0
Q9 ¿Cuántos años tiene?
Answered: 3 Skipped: 1
Total 3
Menos
de 12
años
12-18
años
19-25
años
26-35
años
36-45
años
46-55
años
56-65
años
66-75
años
Más
de
75
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Answer Choices Responses
Menos de 12 años
12-18 años
19-25 años
26-35 años
36-45 años
46-55 años
56-65 años
66-75 años
Más de 75 años
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey - Español
12 / 15
66.67%2
0.00%0
33.33%1
Q10 ¿Cuál es su género?
Answered: 3 Skipped: 1
Total 3
Femenino
Prefiero no
contestar
Answer Choices Responses
Femenino
Masculino
Prefiero no contestar
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey - Español
13 / 15
0.00%0
0.00%0
100.00%2
Q11 ¿Es usted un estudiante en Downey?
Answered: 2 Skipped: 2
Total 2
No, yo no soy un
estudiante
Answer Choices Responses
Sí, K-12
Sí, Universidad
No, yo no soy un estudiante
Downey Bicycling Needs Assessment Survey - Español
14 / 15
100.00%3
0.00%0
Q12 ¿Es usted el padre o tutor de un
estudiante en Downey?
Answered: 3 Skipped: 1
Total 3
Sí
Answer Choices Responses
Sí
No
APPENDIX B
PROJECT SHEETS FOR
REPRESENTATIVE
PROJECTS
1
Road Diet & Class II Bike Lanes
Background
Key Connections
Regional Transportation Facilities
Challenges
!(
!!
!!!!
!!
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
Rive
s
A
v
e
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
ve
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Suv
a
S
t
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
d
Gar
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
5th
S
t
Imperi
a
l
H
w
y
T
e
l
e
g
r
a
p
h
R
d
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Be
l
l
f
l
o
w
e
r
B
l
v
d
Foster Rd
D
o
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Par
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
Pat
t
o
n
R
d
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
W
a
y
Ala
m
e
d
a
S
t
Twe
e
d
y
L
n
Firestone
B
l
v
d
Woo
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Din
w
i
d
d
i
e
S
t
4th
S
t
Guate
m
a
l
a
A
v
e
Quil
l
D
r
Washburn Rd
Hal
e
d
o
n
A
v
e
Lem
o
r
a
n
A
v
e
Pas
s
o
n
s
B
l
v
d
Ha
n
w
e
l
l
A
v
e
Adoree St
Blod
g
e
t
t
A
v
e
Do
n
o
v
a
n
S
t
Downey
Norwalk
Pico Rivera
Montebello
South
Gate
Bell
Commerce
Bellflower
Lynwood
Santa Fe
Springs
Paramount
Bell Gardens
Huntington Park
Cudahy
LA County Unincorporated
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
§¨¦5
WarrenHigh School
DowneyCivic Center
§¨¦605
§¨¦105
DowneyHigh School
!
!
!
M
Metro Green LineLakewood Blvd
Existing and Proposed Bikeways
Figure 4-1
N
Gateway Cities Bike Project Idea Corridor
n School
Park
Bike Path (Class I)
Bike Lane (Class II)
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Buffered Bike Lane (Class II)
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Planned Bicycle Facilities
!!Under/Overpass
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Gateway Cities Bike Project Idea Location
'Existing Bicycle Path Access Points
Phase II Bicycle Improvements
Bike Route (Class III)
Potential Eco-Rapid Line Station
Gardendale Street
!M
Note: This graphic is conceptual in nature, and is dependent on availability of funding and further study of alignments.
Project Extent
Benefits
Old River School Road - Road Diet
The project extends 2.4 miles from Florence Ave to Imperial
Highway.
Old River School Road is a north-south street
in the western area of the City of Downey. This
proposed project would modify the current
configuration of two travel lanes in each direction
to a new configuration of one travel lane in each
direction, bike lanes in each direction, and a center
turning lane. No changes would occur to parking
along the corridor; parking will remain where it
currently exists. The reconfigured roadway will
improve safety and facilitate access to residential
driveways and neighborhood streets. The bike
lanes would provide north-south connectivity
across the west side of the city, serving schools,
recreational facilities, residential communities,
and commercial areas. Segments that already
provide a median turn-lane will include a buffered
bike lane. Additionally, the facility is located close
to the Rio Hondo Bike Path, a key regional facility.
• Rio Hondo Bike Path
• Re-configuration will require removal of travel
lanes; however, traffic counts indicate volumes
are low enough to serve traffic with minimal
impacts to travel time or travel speed
• Addition of bike lanes will require intersection
upgrades such as bicycle detection and
markings
• Provides a high-quality bicycle facility along
the western side of the City of Downey
• Enhances access to schools, recreational
facilities, and commercial areas
• Improves safety through “road makeover” re-
configuration of street
• Furman Park
• Apollo Park
Parks
• Old River Elementary School
• Stauffer Middle School
• Williams Elementary School
• Rio Hondo Elementary School
Schools
• Los Amigos Golf Course
• Rio Hondo Golf Club
Recreational Facilities
N
• Commercial destinations along Firestone Blvd
• Commercial destinations along Florence Ave
Commercial Areas
2
Proposed Improvements
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Bicycle wayfinding
Bike Lane Feasibility
The proposed road diet along Old River School Road
would remove one travel lane in each direction,
converting what is presently a four-lane road into a
two-lane road with a center turn lane and bicycle lanes
in either direction. Road diet reconfigurations are
appropriate for roads with less than 20,000 Average
Daily Traffic (ADT). Old River School Road has a 24-
hour traffic volume count of just under 17,000.1
The installation of a center turn lane preserves the
operational capacity of the road, while improving
Old River School Road
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
Old River School Rd - North of Stewart and Gray Rd
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
EXISTING (60’)
6’
BikeLane
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
6’
BikeLane
10’
Turn Lane
PROPOSED (60’)
Old River School Rd
3
Planning Level Cost Estimate - $580,000
This planning level cost estimate includes signing,
striping and signal modifications for installing bicycle
lanes as described in the Bike Lane Feasibility section.
safety by reducing pedestrian, rear-end, and side-
swipe crashes. In addition, it would improve speed
limit compliance and decrease crash severity.2
The width of Old River School Road is 60’. Removing
one travel lane in each direction allows for a 10’ center
turn lane and two 6’ bike lanes, one in each direction.
No adjustments to the existing parking configuration
would be needed.
In addition to re-striping, the road diet would include
the installation of bicycle wayfinding signage along
the corridor, high-visibility paint at conflict points, and
bicycle detection at intersections.
-----------------------------------------------------------
1 National Data & Surveying Services, Fehr & Peers, 2014. Counts
taken on a typical weekday (Thursday, 6/12/14).
2Federal Highways Administration, 2014. http://safety.fhwa.dot.
gov/provencountermeasures/fhwa_sa_12_013.cfm.
Before After (Photo simulation)
5
Class II & Class III Bike Facilities
!(
!!
!!!!
!!
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
Rive
s
A
v
e
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Suv
a
S
t
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
Blv
d
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
d
Gar
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
5th
S
t
Imp
e
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
T
e
l
e
g
r
a
p
h
R
d
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Be
l
l
f
l
o
w
e
r
B
l
v
d
Foster Rd
D
o
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Par
a
m
o
unt
B
l
v
d
Pat
t
o
n
R
d
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
W
a
y
Ala
me
d
a
S
t
Twe
e
d
y
L
n
Firestone
B
lvd
Woo
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Din
w
i
d
die
S
t
4th
S
t
Guate
m
a
l
a
A
v
e
Quil
l
D
r
Washburn Rd
Hal
e
d
o
n
A
v
e
Lem
o
r
a
n
A
v
e
Pas
s
o
n
s
B
l
vd
Ha
n
w
e
l
l
A
v
e
Adoree St
Blod
g
e
t
t
A
v
e
Do
n
o
v
a
n
S
t
Downey
Norwalk
Pico Rivera
Montebello
South
Gate
Bell
Commerce
Bellflower
Lynwood
Santa Fe
Springs
Paramount
Bell Gardens
Huntington Park
Cudahy
LA County Unincorporated
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
§¨¦5
WarrenHigh School
DowneyCivic Center
§¨¦605
§¨¦105
DowneyHigh School
!
!
!
M
Metro Green LineLakewood Blvd
Existing and Proposed Bikeways
Figure 4-1
N
Gateway Cities Bike Project Idea Corridor
n School
Park
Bike Path (Class I)
Bike Lane (Class II)
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Buffered Bike Lane (Class II)
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Planned Bicycle Facilities
!!Under/Overpass
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Gateway Cities Bike Project Idea Location
'Existing Bicycle Path Access Points
Phase II Bicycle Improvements
Bike Route (Class III)
Potential Eco-Rapid Line Station
Gardendale Street
!M
Note: This graphic is conceptual in nature, and is dependent on availability of funding and further study of alignments.
Background Project Extent
Challenges
Benefits
The project includes three key facilities: Class II bike lanes on
Downey Avenue and Brookshire Avenue, and a Class III bike route
on 5th Street.
The Downtown Downey Bike Access project
incorporates three key facilities to improve bicycle
connections to Downtown Downey. First, a bike
route with signs and sharrows along 5th Street
provides an east-west connection across the city
on a low-volume street.
Second, a “road make-over” on Brookshire Avenue
would modify the current configuration from two
travel lanes in each direction to one travel lane
in each direction, one bike lane in each direction,
and a center turning lane. No changes to parking
would occur; where it currently exists, parking
would remain intact. The Brookshire Avenue bike
lanes would provide a north-south connection
across the city, connecting residential areas to key
destinations in Downtown Downey.
Finally, a “road make-over” on Downey Avenue
would expand access to Downtown Downey,
increase the number of additional destinations
served by bicycle facilities, and provide an
alternative north-south route across the city.
The “road make-over” would modify the current
configuration of two travel lanes in each direction
to one travel lane in each direction, one bike lane
in each direction, and a center turning lane. No
changes to parking along the corridor would occur.
Additionally, the bike lanes would transition to a
bike route with signs and sharrows in Downtown
Downey between 5th Street and Firestone Blvd,
because this portion of the corridor has already
undergone significant traffic calming and
reconfiguration with diagonal parking, pedestrian
bulb-outs, and travel lane removal. The speeds
and volumes along this segment of Downey
Avenue are low enough to support a bike route
instead of bike lanes.
• Provides high-quality bicycle facilities through
downtown Downey, the heart of the city,
including commercial, civic, community, and
residential uses
• Improves east-west access across the city, and
north-south access across the city
• Enhances access to additional destinations
such as schools, parks, and recreational
facilities
• Improves safety through the “road make-over”
of Brookshire Ave and Downey Ave
• Re-configuration will require removal of travel
lanes; however, traffic counts indicate volumes
are low enough to serve traffic with minimal
impacts to travel time or travel speed
• Addition of bike lanes will require intersection
upgrades such as bicycle detection and
markings
Downtown Downey Bicycle Access
6
Key Connections
• Rio San Gabriel Park
• Furman Park
• Brookshire Children’s Park
Parks
• Rio San Gabriel Elementary School
• Downey High School
• Rio Hondo Elementary School
• Gallatin Elementary School
• Alameda Elementary School
• Sussman Middle School
• Warren High School
• Imperial Elementary School
Schools
• City Hall
• Downey Library
• Downey Police Depar tment
• PIH Health
• Downey YMCA
• Churches
Key Destinations
• Downey Community Aquatic Center
• Rio Hondo Golf Club
Recreational Facilities
• Downtown Downey
• Stonewood Mall
• The Promenade (Downey Ave and Firestone Blvd)
Commercial Areas
Proposed Improvements
Brookshire Ave - North of 5th St
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
EXISTING (56’)
5’
BikeLane
5’
BikeLane
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
10’
Turn Lane
Downtown Downey
5th St
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
PROPOSED (56’)
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
EXISTING (38’)
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
PROPOSED (38’)
Downey Ave - Between
5th St and Firestone Blvd
Angled Parking/Bulb-Out
EXISTING (22’)
Angled Parking/Bulb-Out
PROPOSED (22’)
Downey Ave between 5th St & Firestone Blvd
Brookshire Ave - North of 5th St
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
EXISTING (56’)
5’
BikeLane
5’
BikeLane
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
10’
Turn Lane
Downtown Downey
5th St
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
PROPOSED (56’)
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
EXISTING (38’)
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
PROPOSED (38’)
Downey Ave - Between
5th St and Firestone Blvd
Angled Parking/Bulb-Out
EXISTING (22’)
Angled Parking/Bulb-Out
PROPOSED (22’)
Downey Ave north of 5th St/south of Firestone BlvdBrookshire Ave - North of 5th St
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
EXISTING (56’)
5’
BikeLane
5’
BikeLane
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
10’
Turn Lane
Downtown Downey
5th St
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
PROPOSED (56’)
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
EXISTING (38’)
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
PROPOSED (38’)
Downey Ave - Between
5th St and Firestone Blvd
Angled Parking/Bulb-Out
EXISTING (22’)
Angled Parking/Bulb-Out
PROPOSED (22’)
Brookshire Ave
Brookshire Ave - North of 5th St
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
EXISTING (56’)
5’
BikeLane
5’
BikeLane
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
10’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Auto
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
11’
Shared
10’
Turn Lane
Downtown Downey
5th St
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
PROPOSED (56’)
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
EXISTING (38’)
8’
Parking
8’
Parking
PROPOSED (38’)
Downey Ave - Between
5th St and Firestone Blvd
Angled Parking/Bulb-Out
EXISTING (22’)
Angled Parking/Bulb-Out
PROPOSED (22’)
5th St
7
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
5th
S
t
Bicycle wayfinding
STOP
STOP
STO
P
STOP
STOP
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
New
S
t
La Villa
S
t
5th
S
t
BikeCorral
Bike Route
Bike Route
Bike Parking
Bike Lanes
Bicycle wayfinding
8
The proposed bicycle lane facilities would require
a road diet along Brookshire Ave and on Downey
Ave north of 5th Street and south of Firestone Blvd.
The road diet would remove one travel lane in each
direction, converting what is presently a four-lane road
into a two-lane road with a center turn lane. Road diet
reconfigurations are appropriate for roads with less
than 20,000 vehicles over a 24-hour period. Brookshire
Ave has a 24-hour count of just under just over 15,000,
and Downey Ave has a 24-hour count of just over
16,000.1
The installation of a center turn lane preserves the
operational capacity of the road, while improving
safety by reducing pedestrian, rear-end, and side-
swipe crashes. In addition, it would improve speed
limit compliance and decrease crash severity.2
The width of Downey Ave and Brookshire Ave is 56’.
Removing one travel lane in each direction allows for
a 10’ center turn lane and two 5’ bike lanes, one in
each direction. No adjustments to the existing parking
configuration would be needed.
In addition to re-striping, the road diet would include
the installation of bicycle wayfinding signage along
the corridor, high-visibility paint at conflict points, and
signal modifications to allow a bicyclists to call for a
signal cycle at the intersection.
Planning Level Cost Estimate - $980,000
This planning level cost estimate includes signing,
striping and signal modifications for installing bicycle
lanes on Downey Ave and Brookshire Ave, as well
as bicycle routes on 5th Street and on Downey Ave
between 5th Street and Firestone Blvd, as described in
the Bike Lane Feasibility section. This cost represents
the installation of the facilities along the full lengths
of each corridor, beyond the extent of what is
described herein as Downtown Downey bicycle access
improvements.
Bike Lane Feasibility
The proposed bicycle route facilities on 5th Street and
Downey Ave between 5th Street and Firestone Blvd
would not require the removal of any travel lanes,
because these roads currently only have one land in
each direction. The current width of 5th Street is 38’,
and the current width of Downey Ave between 5th
Street and Firestone Blvd is 22’. A bike route would
include the installation of sharrows and signage along
the shared roadway.
----------------------------------------------------------
1 National Data & Surveying Services, Fehr & Peers, 2014. Counts
taken on a typical weekday (Thursday, 6/12/14).
2Federal Highways Administration, 2014. http://safety.fhwa.dot.
gov/provencountermeasures/fhwa_sa_12_013.cfm.
Before After (Photo simulation)
• Installation of protected bicycle lanes will likely
require removal of travel lanes
• Addition of bike lanes will require intersection
upgrades such as bicycle detection and
markings
9
Class II Protected Bike Lanes
Benefits Challenges
Background Project Extent
Lakewood Blvd Bike Lane Feasibility
9
!(
!!
!!!!
!!
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
Rive
s
A
v
e
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Suv
a
S
t
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
d
Gar
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
5th
S
t
Imperi
a
l
H
w
y
T
e
l
e
g
r
a
p
h
R
d
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
Bl
v
d
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Be
l
l
f
l
o
w
e
r
B
l
v
d
Foster Rd
D
o
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Par
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
Pat
t
o
n
R
d
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
W
a
y
Ala
m
e
d
a
S
t
Twee
d
y
L
n
Firestone
B
lvd
Woo
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
Din
w
i
d
die
S
t
4th
S
t
Guate
m
a
l
a
A
v
e
Quil
l
D
r
Washburn Rd
Hal
e
d
o
n
A
v
e
Lem
o
r
a
n
A
v
e
Pas
s
o
n
s
B
l
v
d
Ha
n
w
e
l
l
A
v
e
Adoree St
Blod
g
e
t
t
A
v
e
Do
n
o
v
a
n
S
t
Downey
Norwalk
Pico Rivera
Montebello
South
Gate
Bell
Commerce
Bellflower
Lynwood
Santa Fe
Springs
Paramount
Bell Gardens
Huntington Park
Cudahy
LA County Unincorporated
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
§¨¦5
WarrenHigh School
DowneyCivic Center
§¨¦605
§¨¦105
DowneyHigh School
!
!
!
M
Metro Green LineLakewood Blvd
Existing and Proposed Bikeways
Figure 4-1
N
Gateway Cities Bike Project Idea Corridor
n School
Park
Bike Path (Class I)
Bike Lane (Class II)
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Buffered Bike Lane (Class II)
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Planned Bicycle Facilities
!!Under/Overpass
Bike Lane with Road Diet (Class II)
Gateway Cities Bike Project Idea Location
'Existing Bicycle Path Access Points
Phase II Bicycle Improvements
Bike Route (Class III)
Potential Eco-Rapid Line Station
Gardendale Street
!M
Note: This graphic is conceptual in nature, and is dependent on availability of funding and further study of alignments.
Background Project Extent
Lakewood Blvd is a major north-south arterial that
runs through the center of the City of Downey.
The current configuration along the corridor
is primarily three travel lanes in each direction
with a center raised median. There is no on-
street parking along the Lakewood Blvd corridor.
Lakewood Blvd is a major regional connector, with
junctions at the I-5 and I-105 freeways, continuing
north into the City of Pico Rivera and south into
the Cities of Bellflower and Paramount. Lakewood
Blvd also provides access to the Metro Green Line
Lakewood Station.
One of the most cost-effective approaches to
accommodate a bicycle facility along Lakewood
Blvd is to remove one travel lane in each direction.
Lakewood Blvd could become a very high quality
regional bicycle facility, with protected bike lanes
in both directions through the City of Downey. The
protected bike lanes would provide connections
to regional transit, major commercial areas like
Downtown Downey, Downey Landing, and the
Stonewood Mall, and numerous schools and
parks.
• Provides regional bike access to adjacent cities
and across the Gateway Cities region
• Provides high quality north-south connection
across the City of Downey
• Provides bicycle connection to the Metro
Green Line Lakewood Station
• Enhances access to additional destinations
such as schools, parks, and commercial areas
N
The project would extend 4.5 miles across the City of Downey.
10
Key Connections
• Golden Park
• Dennis the Menace Park
Parks
• Ward Elementary School
• Sussman Middle School
• Alameda Elementary School
• Downey High School
• Gallatin Elementary School
Schools
• Columbia Memorial Space Center
• City of Pico Rivera
• City of Paramount
• City of Bellflower
• Kaiser Permanente Medical Center
Key Destinations
• Downtown Downey
• Stonewood Mall
• Downey Landing
• Planned Tierra Luna development
Commercial Areas
• Metro Green Line Lakewood Station
Regional Transportation Facilities
Proposed Improvements
Bike Lane Feasibility
Based on this approach, the proposed bicycle facility
along Lakewood Blvd would require the removal of
one travel lane in each direction, converting what is
presently a six-lane road with a raised landscaped
median into a four-lane road with protected bicycle
lanes, also known as cycle tracks, on either side.
The width of Lakewood Blvd is 84’. Removing one
travel lane in each direction allows for two 11’ travel
lanes in either direction, one 8’ bicycle lane in either
direction, and a 3’ buffer between the vehicle travel
lanes and the bicycle lanes. Parking is presently not
permitted on Lakewood Blvd and this would remain
consistent under this scenario.
In addition to re-striping, the cycle track could include
the installation of physical barriers such as planters
or bollards in the 3’ buffer between the vehicle travel
lanes and the bicycle lanes, as well as the installation
of bicycle wayfinding signage along the corridor,
high-visibility paint at conflict points, and signal
modifications to allow a bicyclists to call for a signal
cycle at the intersection.
Planning Level Cost Estimate -
$6,000,000
This planning level cost estimate includes signing,
striping and signal modifications along the
corridor, as well as physical barriers in the buffer
zone, as described in the Bike Lane Feasibility
section. This cost does not assume narrowing of
the existing planted medians.
11
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
Combined Bike Lane/Turn Lane
Protected Bike Lane
Bicycle wayfinding
Lakewood Blvd
EXISTING (82’)
11’
Auto
13’
Auto
11’
Auto
12’
RaisedMedian
11’
Auto
13’
Auto
11’
Auto
Lakewood Blvd
PROPOSED (82’)
12’
Auto
12’
Auto
12’
RaisedMedian
12’
Auto
12’
Auto
8’
BikeLane
8’
BikeLane
3’3’
Bu
f
f
e
r
Bu
f
f
e
r
APPENDIX C
WAYFINDING
PROTOCOL
A report prepared for the
City of Downey by Fehr &
Peers
December, 2014
Best Practices in
Developing and
Implementing Bicycle
Wayfinding Signage
for local bicycle networks
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction............................................1
Section 1.
Wayfinding System Design......................2
What Is Wayfinding?....................................2
Signage Network Principles.......................3
Sign Types...................................................5
Destinations................................................6
Integrating Regional and
Local Signage...........................................14
Section 2.
Wayfinding Signage Design...................15
Conceptual Principles..............................15
Technical Principles.................................16
Sign Design...............................................18
Sign Mounting...........................................22
Sign-Specific Principles...........................23
Signage Implementation
Workflow............................................26
Appendix A. References........................27
TOP FIVE
RECOMMENDATIONS
Ensure that sign content can be
easily interpreted from a sign’s
intended viewing distance
Avoid extraneous information
and other visual clutter
Establish a set of agreed
upon destinations and adhere
to this set
Select destinations that are
meaningful to users and have
a strong navigational value
Use hierarchies to structure
destinations and information
on signs
1
2
3
4
5
1
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the state of the art in
bicycle wayfinding. It focuses on the two
hemispheres of wayfinding practice: (1)
the logic governing where signs are placed
and (2) the design of the signs themselves
and their messaging. The report draws
from successfully implemented bicycle,
pedestrian, transit, and airport wayfinding
programs as well as from the literature on
wayfinding and information design. It syn-
thesizes these findings and tailors them to
the specific needs and objectives of bicycle
wayfinding.
This report includes two primary divisions,
Section 1: Wayfinding System Design, and
Section 2: Wayfinding Signage Design.
Section 1 focuses on wayfinding at the
network level. It opens with a brief expla-
nation of wayfinding—what it is, why it’s
beneficial, and the basics of how it works.
Next, we apply the principles of wayfinding
to bicycle infrastructure. We explain the
Great! You’ve decided you’re going to start riding your bike more often.
You’ve filled the tires, adjusted the seat, even planned a route, and now
you’re ready to roll. There’s only one problem. You get a few blocks
into your ride and suddenly the directions become a little fuzzy. Was it a left on
Firestone Blvd or Florence Ave, and what was that great little neighborhood street
without a lot of traffic? Lucky for you, up ahead lies a prominent sign—emblazoned
with a bicycle icon and a list of destinations. You follow the arrows on the sign, and
the next sign, and the sign after that, and within minutes you’ve arrived at your
destination. Could you imagine making your journey without those helpful signs?
purpose of a bicycle wayfinding system,
its intended use, and the four basic bicy-
cle wayfinding sign types. The following
discussion addresses what locations are in-
cluded—and not included—in the universe
of destinations shown on the wayfinding
signs. Finally, we consider future concerns
with integrating regional and local signage.
Section 2 focuses on sign design principles.
It centers on how to clearly convey mes-
sages to people riding bikes while incorpo-
rating a unique brand identity. We present
general recommendations for information
design, clarity, and aesthetics. Since signs
will be placed in a variety of contexts, we
next discuss mounting considerations. The
final section provides formatting specific
to each sign type. We close the report with
a recommended workflow for planning,
designing, and implementing bicycle way-
finding signage.
2
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
SECTION 1. WAYFINDING
SYSTEM DESIGN
WHAT IS WAYFINDING?
Wayfinding in the purest form is a cognitive process. We use it to orient ourselves to our
surroundings and to navigate physical space. Wayfinding in this sense involves four stages:
Wayfinding is also a branch of environmental psychology. People constantly look to their
surroundings for clues to assist their navigation. Wayfinding as a science facilitates this
clue-collection by shaping the built environment. It uses consistent, clear visual cues
and signage to direct users to their destinations. Effective wayfinding systems create
well-structured pathways—with start, middle, and end points—that help travelers to:
1. Identify their location
2. Reinforce that they are traveling in the right direction
3. Navigate junctions and other decision-making points
4. Identify their destination upon arrival
Wayfinding communicates the trajectory of the individual path and its relationship to
the transportation network of which it is a part. Wayfinding also includes key referential
information, such as a traveler’s intermediate position in the path, how far the traveler has
Location
Orientation
Route
Decision
Route
Monitoring
Destination
Recognition
How we
ascertain our
location as
it relates to
nearby objects
and our desired
destination
The process we
use to select a
trajectory toward
our destination
How we
inspect our
surroundings to
confirm that our
intended path
indeed leads to
our destination
Our recognition
that we have
reached
the desired
destination
Wayfinding is a consistent use and organization of definite sensory cues
from the external environment” – Kevin Lynch, Image of the City
3
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
progressed, and the remaining distance
to the destination. Combining these two
types of information—the shape of the
network and the traveler’s location within
it—empowers travelers with the informa-
tion they need to make decisions and guide
themselves to their destination.
By making it easier for persons to navigate
to their destinations, effective wayfinding
reduces confusion, cognitive load, and
stress; ultimately, it produces a more enjoy-
able travel experience. Indeed, the measure
of successful wayfinding is often in how
little people notice that they are actively
relying on signage to navigate.
SIGNAGE NETWORK
PRINCIPLES
Bicycle wayfinding systems have a rela-
tively simple purpose: highlighting bicycle
routes to enhance navigation. In doing so,
wayfinding can also improve the experi-
ence for people riding and may encourage
people to ride more frequently or begin
riding. Effective wayfinding highlights bike
routes in four ways:
1. Identifying the user’s location in
relation to their intended destination
2. Signposting the turns individual bike
routes make
3. Clarifying the interactions between
intersecting routes in the bikeway
network
4. Positioning the network in the context
of the surrounding city and region
The following discussion explains how
bicycle wayfinding accomplishes these four
objectives.
DESTINATION-DRIVEN NAVIGATION
Bicycle wayfinding primarily guides users
through the destinations it displays. As
people riding bikes approach a given sign,
the sign presents a set of destinations that
they can access via designated bikeways.
These destinations serve intrinsic and in-
strumental functions.
In the intrinsic sense, a user may be at-
tempting to reach an actual destination
shown on a wayfinding sign. In this case,
the sign will guide the person directly to
their destination. However, destinations
also serve a broader, instrumental role.
They paint a general picture of the direc-
tion the bikeway travels, the key areas it
serves, and its eventual terminus. People
may not necessarily be traveling to a desti-
nation shown on a sign for the sign to still
provide useful orientation. For example, if
people know their destination is relatively
close to, or in the same direction, as a des-
tination shown on a wayfinding sign, they
can use the posted directions to approxi-
mate the path to their own destination.
A bicycle wayfinding system
consists of comprehensive
signing to guide bicyclists
to their destinations along preferred
bicycle routes” - National Association
of City Transportation Officials
(NACTO), Urban Bikeway Design
Guide
4
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
NAMING BIKEWAYS
Naming bikeways simplifies navigation. It provides a shorthand for an entire bikeway
corridor even if the corridor traverses multiple streets. For bikeways that follow only one
street, the simplest practice is to name the bikeway after the street. Corridors with many
turns often require a broader name. Sometimes these corridors evolve their own colloqui-
al names, such as The Wiggle, a San Francisco bike route that takes multiple jogs to avoid
hills. The City later adopted this name as the bikeway’s official designation. Whenever
practical, preexisting vernacular should be adopted in this manner. Another approach is
to name bikeways based on key attributes like destination (“downtown route”), orientation
(“crosstown route”), or geographic features (“coastal route”). Vancouver, BC provides the
following guidance for creating memorable bikeway names. In general, names should be:
ALTERNATE NAMING APPROACHES
A more complex numbering system could be developed to identify individual bike-
ways in the network. For example, the structure might mimic Interstate highways where
odd-numbered routes run north-south, even-numbered routes run east-west, and route
numbers increase from west to east and south to north, respectively. In this case, wayfin-
ding signage would display route numbers when referencing bikeways (see Figure 1 on
the next page). A drawback of this approach is that users must familiarize themselves with
the numbering system before they can fully utilize the signs. Since the system may not be
SHORTRELEVANTDURABLEDISTINCTIVE
Single words,
using simple,
familiar terms
are more easily
remembered and
communicated.
Long names
often tend to
be abbreviated
which can lead to
misunderstanding
Names that are
connected with the
character of the
facility or the area
it passes through
will be linked
to memory and
experience
Names that are
dedicated to
special events
can be durable
especially if
supported by other
references
Names that have
an impact or
cultural or social
association can be
memorable
If a bikeway has been assigned a name, such as the Rio Hondo Bike Path
or the LA River Bike Path, common practice is to refer to that bikeway by
its name in addition to the destinations it serves.
5
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
immediately intuitive, this approach at a
minimum creates an extra step to using the
signs and at worst presents a barrier to use.
Further, numbering is almost superfluous
when, in essence, the destinations them-
selves name the bikeways, convey general
direction, and articulate how individual
links in the bikeway network function to-
gether. Accordingly, best practice is to use
destinations or bikeway names to identify
bikeways on signage.
SIGN TYPES
There are four basic bicycle wayfinding
sign types: confirmation, decision, turn,
and off-bike route. Each type has a unique
purpose, location, and message (see Table
1 on pages 7-8); however, all four work
interdependently. The first three sign types
move bike riders along the designated
bikeway network (see Figure 2 on page 9).
The fourth sign type, shown in Figure 3
(page 10), directs people onto the bikeway
network from adjacent streets. Note that
signs shown in figures are based on stan-
dard designs from the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The
figures are intended to convey sign con-
tent and messaging. The City of Downey
has been provided four design options for
wayfinding signs through the Bike Master
Plan effort. See Sign Design in Section 2
for additional sign content and formatting
considerations.
Some cities, like Los Angeles and Vancou-
ver, BC, use special street signs to denote
bicycle routes (see Figure 4). This idea
can be adapted for Downey, but should
align with street signage characteristics
for special areas like Downtown Downey
which may have different graphic identi-
ty standards for street signs. Alternately,
Downey could forgo the development of
FIGURE 4. Bikeway Street Signs
Cu
l
l
e
n
M
c
C
o
r
m
i
c
k
FIGURE 1. Numbered Bike Route
Cu
l
l
e
n
M
c
C
o
r
m
i
c
k
6
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
specific street signs for bikeways, because
standalone bicycle wayfinding signs pres-
ent essentially the same message.
Wayfinding signs are placed in both direc-
tions of a street unless the street itself is
one-way or the bikeway only travels in one
direction. Typically, one mile of bikeway
will include four to five wayfinding signs in
each direction. Figure 5 (page 11) illus-
trates conceptual sign placement locations
and how the different sign types interact.
DESTINATIONS
Destinations orient people to their sur-
roundings, and they also convey the geo-
graphic coverage of the bikeway network.
Accordingly, the destinations shown, and
not shown, on wayfinding signs are of cen-
tral importance. This subsection focuses
on the methodology of determining which
locations to include.
DETERMINING DESTINATIONS
Destinations should be immediately fa-
miliar to the majority of users. This maxi-
mizes their potential of being meaningful
landmarks with intrinsic and instrumental
navigational value (see the previous Des-
tination-Driven Navigation subsection for
further discussion). Indeed, not all desti-
nations carry equal weight. Under most
circumstances, showing directions to the
Lakewood Metro Green Line Station, for
example, will be more useful than showing
directions to a single bus stop. In a similar
vein, certain categories of destinations,
such as commercial districts, major transit
stations, or civic facilities, are more appro-
priate for signs than individual retail stores
or places of worship.
The first step in determining which des-
tinations to include is to establish a set of
destination categories. Only destinations
that fall into these categories will be shown
on signs. Each category should next be as-
signed to a hierarchical level based on local
significance. Major destinations like adja-
cent cities or regional transit connections
are positioned at the highest level in the
hierarchy. Destinations that are more local
in nature, such as schools and parks, are
concentrated at lower hierarchical levels.
In the context of bicycle wayfinding,
destination hierarchies often include three
strata: primary, secondary, and tertiary.
Table 2 (page 12) displays the three hierar-
chical levels and destinations that typically
fall within each.
PUBLIC VS.
PRIVATE
DESTINATIONS
Signing for private
destinations and places
of worship can become a
delicate, if not contentious,
process of determining which
to include and which not
to include. We recommend
avoiding these types of
destinations and instead
referencing the neighborhood
in which they are located.
7
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
Sign Type ConfirmationDecisionTurn Off-Bike Route
Purpose • Informs people that they are traveling on a designated bikeway• Provides distance or time to key destinations• Notifies motorists that they are traveling on a bike route
• Shows connections• Marks the junction of two or more bikeways and provides turning guidance through the junction• Informs people of the preferred bike route to key destinations• Provides distance or time to key destinations
• Indicates where a bikeway turns, either from one street onto another street or through a difficult or confusing area
• Informs people traveling on streets not designated as bikeways that a parallel bikeway exists
Location • At start of bicycle facility• Shortly (50’ – 150’) after junction with other bikeway or major arterial• Shortly (50’ – 150’) after bikeway turns from one street onto another• Off-street bikeways: Every quarter- to half-mile, unless another type of sign is needed (see columns to right)• On-street bikeways: Every two to three blocks, unless another type of sign is needed
• Near side of decision-making point (50’ – 150’ in advance), either an intersection with another bikeway or the point of divergence to a key destination
• Near-side of intersection or other turn where bike route changes direction (50’ – 150’ in advance)
• On high traffic, high stress roadways, typically without bicycle facilities, where a lesser known parallel bike route exists
TABLE 1. Four Basic Wayfinding Sign Types
8
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
Sign Type ConfirmationDecisionTurn Off-Bike Route
PrimaryMessage • Up to three destinations that lie ahead on the given bikeway, including mileage or time to each
• Direction (arrow) to up to three desti-nations, including:• Destinations ahead along the current bikeway• Lateral desti-nations, either to the left or right, accessed via intersecting bikeways• Mileage or time to each destination
• Direction (arrow) that bike route turns
• Direction (arrow) to nearby parallel bike route including
Optional Message • Bikeway name • Bikeway name • Bikeway name • Bikeway name• Distance (measured in blocks) or time to parallel bike route
Notes • Pavement markings also provide visual cues that a person is traveling on a designated bikeway
• N/A • Differs from decision sign in that decision sign is used to show intersections with other bike routes, whereas turn sign is used to show where one bikeway turns• Special pavement markings, including sharrows with angled chevrons or turn arrows within bike lanes, can be used to provide additional guidance, especially through difficult or confusing turns
• Intended for limited use in locations with greatest potential benefit to people riding bikes
TABLE 1 (continued). Four Basic Wayfinding Sign Types
BIKEWAY NAME
Intermediate Dest 2mi
Final Destination 5mi
BIKEWAY NAME
Left Dest
Right Dest
Final Dest 5mi
3mi
4mi
BIKEWAY NAME
BIKEWAY NAME
Intermediate Dest 2mi
Final Destination 5mi
BIKEWAY NAME
Left Dest
Right Dest
Final Dest 5mi
3mi
4mi
BIKEWAY NAME
DECISION TURN
TURN
Used when bikeway
changes direction
CONFIRMATION
Used after junction
and periodically
along route
DECISION
Used at junctions
with other bikeways
CONFIRMATION
FIGURE 2. On-Bike Route Wayfinding Signs9
Bikeway Name1block
Bikeway Name1block
OFF-BIKE ROUTE
OFF-BIKE ROUTE
Used on roads
parallel to bikeways
10FIGURE 3. Off-Bike Route Wayfinding Sign
11
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
D
T T
C
C
C
C
C
DD
T T
C
O
O
1
M
I
L
E
Confirmation signC
Decision signD
Off-bike route signO
Turn signT
Bike route
FIGURE 5. Conceptual Sign Placement Locations
12
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
Another way of thinking about hierarchi-
cal levels is in terms of granularity. Prima-
ry destinations are broad, large places, like
ajdacent cities, the Metro Green Line Sta-
tion, or Downtown Downey, that indicate
a bikeway’s general direction or terminus.
Typically these long-range destinations
are signed over a significant portion of the
bikeway, if not its entirety. Secondary and
tertiary destinations are more fine-grained
in nature, such the Downey Public Library
or Downey Landing. These shorter-range
destinations are area-specific and are
only signed within a half-mile (tertiary),
mile (secondary) of their location. In the
densest settings, destinations may only be
signed for a matter of blocks. As the user
traverses the bikeway, he or she will en-
counter relatively few primary destinations
and a greater assortment of secondary and
tertiary destinations.
As Table 2 shows, a destination’s hierar-
chical level also determines how far away
signs are placed for the destination. High-
er-ranking destinations are signed from
greater distances; lower ranking desti-
nations are signed only in their vicinity.
As people travel along a bikeway, each
sign progressively discloses new destina-
tion information based on their location.
Passed destinations are removed, new
nearby destinations are added, and one or
two long-range destinations are included
for orientation (see Figure 6 on page 13).
Typically, no more than three destinations
are shown. If more than three destinations
can be signed at a potential location, one
destination from each hierarchical level
should be included to provide a balance
of destinations. Presenting information in
manageable quantities helps to avoid over-
loading the user.
Hierarchical Level PrimarySecondaryTertiary
Distance from which Destination Is Shown on Signs
• Up to two miles• Up to one mile • Up to one-half mile
Destination Categories • Neighborhoods or districts• Transit centers• Airports
• Bike paths or other major named bikeways*• High schools• Hospitals• Landmarks• Major parks
• Community centers• Elementary and middle schools• Local parks• Public facilities• Other, as defined by municipalities
* Since bikeways in this case function as destinations, only include bikeways that will be familiar even to infrequent bicycle riders, such as the San Gabriel River Bike Path, the Rio Hondo Bike Path, or the LA River Path.
Notes: Adopt standard naming, punctuation, and abbreviation conventions when developing the destination list and always adhere to these standards. In areas with few natural landmarks, roads or paths may act as surrogate destinations.
TABLE 2. Destination Categories and Hierarchy
Alameda ES
Metro Station
D. Landing 0.5mi
0.9mi
1.8mi
Golden Park
Paramount
Metro Station 0.5mi
1.5mi
3mi
City Hall
Metro Station
Downey HS 1mi
1mi
3mi
TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3Destination Level
Downtown Downey 2mi
Lakewood Metro 3mi
Downey Landing 1.5mi
Downey Library 0.5mi
Apollo Park 0.3mi
Downey HS 0.2mi
Examples
Shown
Below
Few
destinations
Signed for long
lengths of a
corridor
Relatively few
destinations
Signed for
intermediate
distances
Many
destinations
Signed for
short
distances
Characteristics
Repetition
13 FIGURE 6. Progression of Destinations
14
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
INTEGRATING REGIONAL
AND LOCAL SIGNAGE
Generally speaking, it is preferable to use
only one graphic identity across all way-
finding signs of a certain purpose. For
example, all highway signs or all airport
passenger signs tend to possess the same
visual character. This uniformity bene-
fits the user; repetition of familiar motifs
reduces the amount of time a user spends
searching for signs and interpreting their
information.
However, there are many instances when
universally standardizing appearance is
simply not possible. This is likely to be the
case as more cities in the Gateway Cities
region develop bicycle wayfinding systems.
As this occurs, the proliferation of existing
signage will necessitate a regional-local
coordination effort.
The best practice for integrating regional
and local bicycle wayfinding is to consid-
er signage along three dimensions: new
Downey-implemented bikeways signs,
existing Downey signage, and regional
Gateway Cities signage. Each classification
requires a unique implementation strategy
as described below.
All new signage that Downey deploys
should adhere to the graphic identity
developed through this Bicycle Wayfin-
ding Signage Project. Depending on the
approach taken to future regional-local
signage integration, Downey may be able
to influence the development and adoption
of regional design standards.
REFINING DESTINATIONS
The process of determining which des-
tinations to include is typically iterative.
Whereas identifying primary and second-
ary destinations may be fairly straightfor-
ward, selecting lower-tier destinations is
certain to require additional refinement.
Once categories and hierarchies of desti-
nations have been determined, the next
step is to establish a universe of all possible
destinations that fall into these categories.
GIS data, aerial imagery, and regional fa-
miliarity all help to populate this list. If the
generated list of destinations is too large
to practically use, there are a handful of
approaches to narrow the field of included
destinations:
• Constraining geographic scope for
lower-tier destinations
• Approach 1: linear. Only desti-
nations that fall within a certain
distance of a bikeway are included.
The distance is based on hierarchi-
cal levels from Table 2
• Approach 2: nodal. Only destina-
tions in and around predetermined
focus areas or neighborhoods are
included
• Narrowing eligibility criteria in cer-
tain categories, such as including only
parks over a certain size or only major
hospitals
• Removing individual destination cate-
gories of lower importance
15
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
Flow orders the hierarchy to follow the
path our eyes and brain take as they scan
through and interpret information. The eye
tends to scan information from top to bot-
tom and left to right. Therefore, the most
important pieces of information are locat-
ed toward the top of the sign and the sign’s
left side. Information of lesser importance
is located toward the right and bottom
portions of the sign. A sound hierarchy
and flow insure that the sign’s message is
optimized for rapid, coherent internaliza-
tion by the user.
THE FOUR DS
In the context of a bicycle wayfinding sign,
the fundamental pieces of information are
designation, destination, direction, and
duration. Each of these pieces is assigned
to one of four hierarchical levels based on
the order in which the user needs to inter-
nalize the information (see Figure 10). This
assignment determines where the piece of
information is placed on the sign.
The sign should first designate itself as a
piece of bicycle wayfinding information,
typically with a large bicycle-related icon
or text. This is the target a user will seek
when searching for wayfinding informa-
tion. This information is displayed promi-
nently at the top and center of the sign. As
a subset of level 1, the sign should show
the bikeway name or logo if it possesses
these features. This information should
SECTION 2. WAYFINDING
SIGNAGE DESIGN
CONCEPTUAL PRINCIPLES
This subsection provides a high-level dis-
cussion of information design in the con-
text of bicycle wayfinding. The following
principles form the basis for how informa-
tion is positioned on each sign.
INFORMATION HIERARCHY AND FLOW
Every sign should be constructed around
a deliberate hierarchy and flow of informa-
tion. Hierarchy provides structure to the
information. In general terms, the most
important pieces are at the top of the hier-
archy. They are presented first and they are
displayed in the largest size. Information
of lesser importance comes later and in
smaller sizes.
BIKEWAY NAME
Left Dest
Right Dest
Final Dest 5mi
3mi
4mi
LEVEL 1
Designation
LEVEL 1A
Designation
LEVEL 4
Duration
LEVEL 3
Direction
LEVEL 2
Destination
FIGURE 10. Information Hierarchy
16
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
signs are placed immediately after a junc-
tion and then at regular intervals along the
bike route.
TECHNICAL PRINCIPLES
This discussion addresses finer-grain
aspects of information design unique to
bicycle wayfinding signage.
DESIGNING FOR BICYCLE SCALE
Signs need to be designed for immediate
legibility from the perspective of a person
riding a bike. Factors like a bike rider’s in-
tended lane position or height can inform
sign design; however, the cardinal design
consideration is speed. Based on guidance
from Portland, OR, people riding bikes
should be able to see an upcoming sign
from about 100 feet away. Assuming peo-
ple on bikes travel at an “urban average”
speed of ten miles per hour, they should
have about seven seconds to interpret the
sign. People riding bikes should not have
to stop to read signs. Therefore, signs must
clearly convey their message inside the
seven second envelope. The following prin-
ciples help to achieve this goal:
TEXT
• Use the following rule-of-thumb for
text size on road signs: one inch of
capital letter height for every 40 feet
of desired legibility. Signs should be
visible from roughly 100 feet away, so
capital letters should be 2 to 2.5 inches
tall
• Employ mixed-case rather than all-
capitals for smaller text. The greater
be centered below the bicycle icon such
that the eye can flow directly from the first
piece of information to the next.
Directional information is then presented
below. This hierarchical level is where left/
right alignment is introduced. A person
using a sign will first need to identify the
destination that is most relevant to them
before they require direction or distance
information. Accordingly, destination
information is presented along the left side
of the sign.
Direction and distance information exist at
subordinate hierarchical levels, yet they are
also tied to a destination. Therefore, they
are shown on the same line as the destina-
tion. Directional arrows should be promi-
nent as they are essential to navigation.
PREDICTABILITY AND REDUNDANCY
Users become familiar with how signs are
presented—their position, shape, color,
and even font. Consistently repeating these
features helps users to anticipate where
signs will be placed and the messages the
signs will convey. This reduces the amount
of time needed to understand each sign.
The Designing for Bicycle Scale subsection
below presents best practices for improv-
ing the predictability of signs for people
riding bikes.
Redundancy is beneficial in the event a
user misses a sign, or if contextual factors
obscure a sign temporarily. The four basic
bicycle wayfinding sign types work togeth-
er to create a healthy, but not excessive
redundancy. For example, confirmation
17
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
• Eliminate extraneous information,
graphics, shapes, and logos to reduce
cognitive load and distraction
• Employ diagrams to illustrate complex
intersections
• Limit the use of nonstandard
abbreviations, as they may take
additional time to discern
• Consider rounding travel times to the
nearest five-minute interval. Times like
23 minutes may create a false sense of
precision. Non-rounded numbers may
also be harder to process as a person in
motion quickly passes by
• Avoid the use of divergent sign
shapes. Signs of different shapes,
such as arrow-shaped signs used with
rectangular signs, or signs of different
orientations, such as horizontal and
vertical rectangles, create a disjointed
appearance (see Figure 11 on page
23). Signs of wildly different shapes
and sizes can obscure each piece of
information. Ideally all signs will
conform to a uniform width. This is
especially important for modular signs
(i.e. assemblies made up of a bike route
sign and then one or more wayfinding
panels)
MEASUREMENTS OF DISTANCE
Confirmation, decision, and off-bike route
signs should ideally all convey distances.
Distances are measured spatially (miles
or blocks), temporally (minutes), or using
both. Each of these approaches has advan-
tages and disadvantages as Table 4 (page
23) highlights.
variability in character height inherent
to mixed-case text enhances legibility
• Avoid tight character spacing and
scaling
CONTRAST AND PROXIMITY
• Use high contrast between text and
background colors
• Group related pieces of information
and assign them similar sizes and
shapes
• Space unrelated pieces of information
apart from one another and maximize
contrast between them (except with
sign shapes as discussed below);
dissimilar items with minimal
contrast can create a distracting visual
dissonance
• Create a clear segregation between
wayfinding elements and branding
elements like agency names and logos
CONSISTENCY AND REPETITION
• Maintain a consistent color, font, and
iconography scheme
• Strive to position signs at consistent
heights and on standard mounting
devices. See the Sign Mounting
subsection below for further discussion
• Adopt standard naming, punctuation,
and abbreviation conventions when
defining destinations and always
adhere to them (see the Destinations
subsection above)
SIMPLICITY AND LEGIBILITY
• Use the shortest, most concise phrasing
whenever possible
• Consider using icons to supplement
text for people who are not fluent in
English
18
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
SIGN DESIGN
Signs are first and foremost information
tools. As such, they need to convey their
messages as clearly as possible. However,
signs need not be bland to accomplish this
goal. Distinct, eye-catching design may
enhance signs by:
• Heightening the visual prominence of
both the signs and bicycling as a whole
• Shortening the time it takes for a
person riding a bike to locate a sign
• Establishing a unique identity for
bicycling in Downey
• Creating a “passive marketing” tool
that draws attention to the bicycle
network
The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD) establishes stan-
dards for all traffic signs and related
MeasurementAdvantages Disadvantages
Miles • Standard concept that travelers are readily familiar with• No subjectivity of units or variability based on travel speed
• Perception of how long a mile is varies by mode and by person; even short distances may seem daunting to some individuals, which can discourage cycling• Units may not be comprehensible to foreign users
Minutes • Gives people a sense of how long a trip will take, which may help them better plan their journey• May encourage cycling by emphasizing the length of the trip, which for bicycles is often relatively short, rather than the distance, which perceptually can appear longer than it actually is
• Based on an assumed average cycling speed; however, travel speeds vary greatly among differing individuals and traffic conditions, so the metric may not be applicable to all people and traffic conditions
Both Units • Allows people to use the units that are most comfortable to them • Increases the amount of information on signs, which may necessitate smaller font sizes that make content harder to read
TABLE 4. Trade-Offs of Duration Measurement Units
FIGURE 11. Signs of Many
Shapes and Sizes May Create
Confusion
Fl
i
c
k
r
u
s
e
r
j
o
s
h
u
a
p
u
t
n
a
m
19
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
Downey has an established color palate
outlined in the Discover Downey Brand
Identity Report & Graphic Standards, up-
dated April 2014. The bicycle wayfinding
system should adhere to these standards or
the standard MUTCD color palate.
TYPEFACE
The font used on signs is perhaps the single
most important determinant of the sign’s
overall legibility—and visual character.
Font should be carefully chosen for opti-
mal legibility. Maximizing legibility leads
to quicker recognition of letterforms and
thereby words. This translates to a faster
internalization of the sign’s message. Font
choices also need to consider visibility
under poor weather and nighttime condi-
tions, sight-impaired individuals, and even
fast-traveling bike riders. Table 6 (page
26) presents a sample of industry standard
transportation wayfinding fonts.
Generally speaking, it is best to use only
one typeface for information design. This
practice reduces unnecessary complexity.
A secondary font may be used sparingly
for branding purposes. If two font families
are used, they need to possess a strong
contrast so as not to blend together. Deco-
rative fonts should generally be avoided.
ICONOGRAPHY
Using a set of pictograms for common
destinations like parks, transit stations,
schools, and neighborhoods offers a simple
way to improve information accessibility.
Pictograms display destinations as sim-
ple graphics, typically without the use of
words. Graphics allow people who are not
traffic control devices. Designs in the
MUTCD are rigorously tested. Moreover,
MUTCD-compliant signs have a look that
is familiar to nearly all road users. For
these reasons, the MUTCD should gov-
ern technical aspects of sign design and
placement, such as dimensions, font size,
and ground clearance. Although we pres-
ent recommendations for color and font
choices below, the final design of Downey’s
regional bicycle wayfinding signs will oc-
cur at a later phase of this project.
Bicycle wayfinding signs may borrow some
aesthetic cues from pedestrian wayfinding
signage, which tends to place a stronger
emphasis on graphic design. However, it
is important to remember that pedestrian
signs are intended for viewing at a slow-
er travel speed than bicycling. Therefore,
certain concepts common to pedestrian
wayfinding, such as intricate graphics,
smaller fonts, and long place names, may
not be suitable for bicycle signage.
COLOR
Signage should generally employ a limited
color palate. Unnecessary use of colors for
aesthetic purposes often leads to “color
pollution,” the tendency for coloration
to compete for attention with a sign’s
message. Additionally, many colors have
associated connotations. It is important to
consider these meanings when choosing
colors. Table 5 (page 25), excerpted from
National Passenger Facilitation Committee
(2011) and modified to include MUTCD
color definitions, presents colors and their
associated meanings.
20
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
Color Associated Meanings Attention Grabbing Value Contrasts Well with
Red • Stop• Warning• Danger• Hot• Unsafe • Regulatory (MUTCD)
• Good • White
Yellow • Caution Slow• Delay• Hazard• School zone (MUTCD)• Warning (MUTCD)
• Good • Black, dark blue
Green • Go• OK• Safe• Good• Clean• Start• Operational• Guidance (MUTCD)
• Poor • White
Light Blue • Advice• Advisory warnings• Cold• Neutral• Information
• Poor • Black
Dark Blue • Advice• Advisory warnings• Information• Services (MUTCD)
• Poor • White
Orange • Be prepared• Slow• Warning• Construction (MUTCD)
• Good • Black, dark blue
Brown • Security• Recreation (MUTCD)• Poor • White, light blue
Grey • Neutral • Poor • White or black (depending on brightness)
White • Advisory • Poor • Green, black, red, dark blue, gray
Black • Difficult• Background • Poor • White, light blue, yellow
TABLE 5. Color Associations and Characteristics
21
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
ing, it is best to not include agency logos
on signs. Logos present the user with in-
formation that is not necessary for naviga-
tion. When initially scanning a sign, users
have to parse the logo, determine that it
will not help them get to their destination,
and then continue scanning the sign for
actual navigation information—all within
about seven seconds. In essence, logos add
extraneous visual complexity that com-
petes with and detracts from core naviga-
tion information.
Logos that enhance wayfinding, such as the
San Gabriel River Bike Trail logo, should
be included. Logos that are not associated
with wayfinding should not be included to
reduce sign clutter.
fluent in English to use the signs. Often-
times, pictograms can be added next to
destination names without cluttering signs.
Two important considerations need to be
followed when using pictograms. Picto-
grams need to be instantly and universally
recognizable as symbols of the destinations
they portray. Their messages should be
apparent to people on bicycles approaching
at speed. As with place names, pictograms
need to be consistently applied with regard
to size, scaling, and whether or not the
graphic is included for a destination.
LOGOS
Logos in wayfinding materials present a
unique set of challenges. Generally speak-
Font Sample Text
Clearview
DIN
Frutiger
Helvetica
Highway Gothic (FHWA Series 2000)
Wayfinding Sans
TABLE 6. Effective Wayfinding Fonts
22
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
Signage needs to be placed in consistent,
predictable locations in order to be most
effective. Bicycle wayfinding should not be
mounted to traffic signals or lighting, util-
ity, and transit stop poles. These locations,
while opportunistic, are highly unpredict-
able. Signs in these locations are at great-
est risk of blending in with or becoming
obscured by their surroundings. Further,
people riding bikes may not think, to look
for signs in these places. Nonstandard
mountings may even increase the com-
plexity of installation and maintenance.
Finally, signs should be positioned so that
the directions they give clearly point to the
corresponding path of travel. No signs—
especially decision and turn signs—should
be placed near any streets, paths, or diver-
gences that might be mistaken for anything
other than the bicycle rider’s intended
path.
SIGN MOUNTING
Even the best designed sign will be use-
less if people cannot locate it. Effective
sign mounting is critical. Signs should be
mounted in consistent, conspicuous loca-
tions. Clear sightlines, free of plants and
other obstructions, should extend between
the bicycle path of travel and the signs.
Bicycle signage tends to be smaller than
primary directional signs for motorists,
but about the same size as ancillary mo-
torist signs, like small destination markers
or parking restriction signs. It is easy for
bicycle wayfinding to get lost in a clutter
of similarly proportioned signs (see Figure
12). Signs that are harder to locate make
for a slower wayfinding process. Or worse,
people riding bikes may miss them alto-
gether. A unique brand identity for bicycle
wayfinding signs may alleviate this prob-
lem somewhat. To further reduce the oc-
currence, bicycle wayfinding signs should
be mounted with a clear space of at least a
foot to the nearest sign of any other type.
The MUTCD provides helpful guidance for
sign mounting, height, and ground clear-
ance. It should be followed when crews in-
stall signs. Best practice is to mount bicycle
wayfinding signs on their own poles. Free-
standing signs will be easier for people to
locate and less susceptible to clutter from
other signs. A lesser but still acceptable
practice is to mount bike wayfinding signs
on poles shared with other regulatory sig-
nage. People riding bikes may be expected
to already be scanning these locations for
information relevant to their travel.
FIGURE 12. Unrelated Signs
Lose Effectiveness When Grouped
Closely Together
Fl
i
c
k
r
u
s
e
r
J
o
h
n
L
u
t
o
n
23
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
TABLE 7. Sign-Specific Principles
Sign Type ConfirmationDecisionTurn Off-Bike Route
Number of Destinations • Up to three destinations per sign, listed vertically
• Up to three destinations per sign, listed vertically
• No destination shown • Typically one destination, the nearest adjacent bikeway
Organization of Destinations • List destinations from shortest to farthest distance, such that destinations “fall off” the sign once they have been passed• List only destinations downstream from the current sign, preferably destinations accessible from the given bikeway• If one destination is accessible using multiple routes, include “via” routing information (e.g. “via Downtown”)• Always include the next primary destination or terminus of the bikeway as the final destination on the list• Intermediate destinations will correspond to the hierarchy of destinations (see Destinations subsection) and local context
• List destinations from top to bottom as follows:• Top destination: through• Upward-facing arrow• Sign for the through bikeway’s next major destination or terminal• Middle destination: left, onto perpendicular bikeway• Left-facing arrow• Sign for the closest intermediate destination on the perpendicular bikeway• Bottom destination: right, onto perpendicular bikeway• Right-facing arrow• Sign for the closest intermediate destination on the perpendicular bikeway
• No destination shown • N/A in most cases• If multiple adjacent bikeways are shown, follow guidance for decision signs
SIGN-SPECIFIC PRINCIPLES
Table 7 (below and on the following pages)
presents specific formatting considerations
for the four basic sign types in bicycle way-
finding. For a broader discussion of sign
purposes, see the Sign Types discussion
above in Section 1.
24
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
Sign Type ConfirmationDecisionTurn Off-Bike Route
Division Between Destinations
• Insert a horizontal line between each destination
• Insert a horizontal line between destinations in different directions• Do not insert a horizontal line between groups of destinations located in the same direction
• N/A • N/A in most cases• If multiple adjacent bikeways are shown, insert a horizontal line between each
Text Justification and Arrow Placement: MUTCD Style
• Left-justify all text and place arrows to the left of the text
• Through destination and destinations to the left use left-justified text with directional arrow to the left of the destination text• Destinations to the right use right-justified text with directional arrow to the right of the destination text• Groups of destinations located in the same direction can be shown with one arrow (each destination receives its own distance information, if included)
• Arrow only; no text • Same as decision signs
Text Justification and Arrow Placement: Pedestrian Wayfinding Style
• Position all arrows on one side of the sign and align all text in one justification, either left or right
• Position all arrows on one side of the sign, regardless of direction, and align all text in one justification, either left or right
• Arrow only; no text • Same as decision signs
Distance Information (Either Spatial or Temporal)
• Include distance to destinations • Include distance to destinations • N/A • Distance information optional but recommended
Display Bikeway Name (if Named)
• Recommended• Recommended• Recommended• N/A
TABLE 7 (continued). Sign-Specific Principles
25
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
Sign Type ConfirmationDecisionTurn Off-Bike Route
Sign Construction Options
• One-piece sign• Two-piece sign with bike route flag and separate destinations panel• Multi-piece sign with bike route flag and blades for individual destinations• Bikeway name, if included, is displayed on a separate panel for all except the one-piece sign options
• One-piece sign• Two-piece sign with bike route flag and separate destinations panel• Multi-piece sign with bike route flag and blades for individual destinations• Bikeway name, if included, is displayed on a separate panel for all except the one-piece sign options
• Two-piece sign with bike route flag and separate turn arrow• Bikeway name, if included, is displayed on a separate panel
• Typically one-piece sign• If multiple adjacent bikeways are shown, follow guidance for decision signs
TABLE 7 (continued). Sign-Specific Principles
26
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
SIGNAGE
IMPLEMENTATION
WORKFLOW
This final section proposes a workflow for
planning, designing, and implementing
bicycle wayfinding signage. The workflow
guides the entire rollout of the wayfinding
signage.
Step zero is provided in Appendix B:
Wayfinding Locations. Steps one and two
fall within this Bicycle Wayfinding Sig-
nage document. Steps three through eight
would be completed on a network-wide or
project-by-project basis by Downey staff or
outside consultants.
WORKFLOW
Define the bikeway network to
be signed, including trunk and
connecting routes, as well as
bikeway names (if desired)
Establish a master list of
destinations and assign each
destination to a hierarchical level
Develop signage design
and guidelines
Display the destinations and
bikeway network together on
the same map
Divide the bike routes into
segments bookended by major
destinations; these destinations
will be used as control locations
(termini) when creating signs
Identify junctions, turns, and
other decision points where
turn or decision signs will be
necessary
Prepare signage plan, including
placement and content of
individual signs; create a GIS
database to manage content and
location details for each sign
Prioritize implementation
Implement signs
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
27
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
APPENDIX A.
REFERENCES
California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans). (2012). California MUTCD
2012 Edition, Part 9: Traffic Control for Bi-
cycle Facilities. Retrieved from: http://www.
dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/engineering/mutcd/
ca_mutcd2012.htm
City of Berkeley, CA. (2014). Bicycle
Boulevard Signage System. Retrieved
from: http://www.cityofberkeley.info/Pub-
lic_Works/Transportation/Bicycle_Boule-
vard_Signage_System.aspx
City of Berkeley, CA, and Wilbur Smith
Associates. (2000). Bicycle Boulevard
Design Tools and Guidelines. Retrieved
from: http://www.cityofberkeley.info/Pub-
lic_Works/Transportation/Bicycle_Boule-
vard_Guidelines.aspx
City of Fort Collins, CO. (2014). Draft
2014 Bicycle Master Plan, Appendix D.
Wayfinding Guidance. Retrieved from:
http://www.fcgov.com/bicycling/pdf/ap-
pendix_d_wayfinding_guidance.pdf
City of Oakland, CA Bicycle & Pedestrian
Facilities Program. (2011, revised). City
of Oakland Design Guidelines for Bicycle
Wayfinding Signage. Retrieved from: http://
nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/
City-of-Oakland-2009.pdf
City of Palo Alto, CA, and Alta Planning
+ Design. (2011). Bicycle + Pedestrian
Transportation Plan, Appendix A. De-
sign Guidelines & Standards. Retrieved
from: http://www.altaprojects.net/
files/7313/1247/9077/Palo_Alto_BPTP_
Draft_Appendices_rev_8-3.pdf
City of San Mateo, CA, and Alta Planning
+ Design. (2013). City of San Mateo Bike-
way Wayfinding Signage Design. Retrieved
from: http://www.cityofsanmateo.org/Doc-
umentCenter/View/36958
City of Seattle, WA. (2013). Seattle Bicycle
Master Plan, Appendix G. Bicycle Route
Signage and Wayfinding Protocol. Retrieved
from: http://www.seattle.gov/transporta-
tion/docs/bmp/final/AppendixG.pdf
Howard County, MD. (2014). Howard
County Bicycle Master Plan, Appendix H.
Wayfinding and Signage Systems. Retrieved
from: http://www.howardcountymd.gov/
uploadedFiles/Home/Department_Hid-
den_Content_(PDF_and_HTML)/Plan-
ning_and_Zoning/Bike%20Howard%20
Appendix%20H.pdf
Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition,
South Bay Bicycle Coalition, and Alta
Planning + Design. (2011). South Bay
Bicycle Master Plan. Retrieved from: http://
www.southbaybicyclecoalition.org/pass-
the-plan-action-plan/south-bay-bicycle-
master-plan-review-copy
28
DO
W
N
E
Y
BE
S
T
P
R
A
C
T
I
C
E
S
I
N
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
I
N
G
A
N
D
I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
W
A
Y
F
I
N
D
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
National Passenger Facilitation Committee
(2011). Wayfinding Good Practice Guide
for Australian International Airports. Re-
trieved from: http://www.customs.gov.au/
webdata/resources/files/WayfindingGuide.
pdf
Town Of Carrboro, NC. (2009) Com-
prehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan,
Chapter 7: Design Guidelines. Retrieved
from: http://bikecarrboro.com/library/pdf/
bike_plan/Chapter7.pdf
TransLink. (2013). Get There By Bike!
Wayfinding Guidelines for Utility Cycling in
Metro Vancouver. Retrieved from: http://
www.translink.ca/en/Getting-Around/Cy-
cling/Bicycle-Wayfinding-Guidelines.aspx
Transportation Research Board Airport
Cooperative Research Program. (2011).
ACRP Report 52: Wayfinding and Signing
Guidelines for Airport Terminals and Land-
side. Retrieved from: http://onlinepubs.trb.
org/onlinepubs/acrp/acrp_rpt_052.pdf
Louisville, KY, Metro Government. (2011).
Request for Permission to Experiment: Bicy-
cle Wayfinding signed Network. Retrieved
from: http://louisvilleky.gov/government/
bike-louisville
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
(MTC). (2012). Regional Transit Wayfin-
ding Guidelines & Standards. Retrieved
from: http://www.mtc.ca.gov/services/sig-
nage/MTC_Regional_Hub_Signage_Stan-
dards_2012.pdf
National Association of City Transporta-
tion Officials (NACTO). (2014). Bike Route
Wayfinding Signage and Markings System.
Retrieved from: http://nacto.org/cit-
ies-for-cycling/design-guide/bikeway-sign-
ing-marking/bike-route-wayfinding-sig-
nage-and-markings-system
National Association of City Transpor-
tation Officials (NACTO). (2014). Urban
Bikeway Design Guide, Second Edition.
Washington, DC: IslandPress
APPENDIX D
BICYCLE AND VEHICLE
COUNTS
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 000 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
000
10 0
000 000
100
100
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 000 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
100 100
200 100
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
0
0
1
0
South Leg
030
East Leg
North Leg
0
2
1
0
South Leg
East Leg
0
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
1
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
0
0
0
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Street-010
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Lakewood Blvd and Florence Ave , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
0
0
0
CONTROL
100
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
10
700 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Florence Ave
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 000 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
000
00 0
000 000
100
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 010 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
000 000
100 100
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
0
0
0
0
South Leg
010
East Leg
North Leg
0
1
1
0
South Leg
East Leg
1
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
0
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
1
0
1
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Street-009
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Woodruff Ave and Imperial Hwy , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
1
0
0
CONTROL
000
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
10
900 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Imperial Hwy
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 120 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
100
30 0
100 000
000
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 110 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
500 400
100 000
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
3
0
2
0
South Leg
060
East Leg
North Leg
0
4
4
0
South Leg
East Leg
2
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
2
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
6
0
3
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Street-008
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Lakewood Blvd and Firestone Blvd , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
3
0
0
CONTROL
500
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
00
715 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Firestone Blvd
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 000 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
000
00 0
000 000
000
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 030 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
000 000
000 000
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
0
0
0
0
South Leg
000
East Leg
North Leg
0
0
3
0
South Leg
East Leg
3
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
0
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
3
0
3
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Street-007
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Brookshire Ave and Firestone Blvd , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
3
0
0
CONTROL
000
Br
o
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
00
830 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Firestone Blvd
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 030 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
000
10 0
000 000
100
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 110 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
200 100
100 100
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
3
0
3
0
South Leg
030
East Leg
North Leg
0
2
5
0
South Leg
East Leg
2
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
3
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
4
0
1
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Street-006
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Lakewood Blvd and Imperial Hwy , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
1
0
0
CONTROL
200
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
10
715 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Imperial Hwy
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 011 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
000
00 0
000 000
000
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 010 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
000 000
000 100
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
2
0
1
0
South Leg
000
East Leg
North Leg
0
1
2
0
South Leg
East Leg
1
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
1
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
3
0
1
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Street-005
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Paramount Blvd and Firestone Blvd , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
1
0
0
CONTROL
000
Pa
r
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
10
700 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Firestone Blvd
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 000 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
000
10 0
100 000
000
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 050 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
100 100
100 000
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
0
0
0
0
South Leg
020
East Leg
North Leg
0
1
5
0
South Leg
East Leg
5
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
0
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
6
0
6
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Street-004
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Paramount Blvd and Stewart and Gray Rd , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
6
0
0
CONTROL
100
Pa
r
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
00
700 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Stewart and Gray Rd
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 000 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
300
10 0
000 000
000
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 041 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
100 400
000 100
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
0
0
0
0
South Leg
010
East Leg
North Leg
0
5
5
0
South Leg
East Leg
5
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
0
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
7
0
7
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Street-003
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Paramount Blvd and Imperial Hwy , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
7
0
0
CONTROL
100
Pa
r
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
10
700 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Imperial Hwy
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 100 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
000
20 0
000 000
100
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 001 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
300 200
100 200
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
1
0
0
0
South Leg
040
East Leg
North Leg
0
4
1
0
South Leg
East Leg
1
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
0
0
0
Northbound Approach
11:00 AM
1
0
0
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Street-002
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
8:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Bike Path and Firestone Blvd , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
0
0
0
CONTROL
300
Bi
k
e
P
a
t
h
AM Peak Hour
Saturday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
20
830 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/7/2014
Firestone Blvd
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 000 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
000
50 0
000 000
700
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 000 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
500 500
700 700
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
0
0
0
0
South Leg
0120
East Leg
North Leg
0
12
0
0
South Leg
East Leg
0
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
0
0
0
Northbound Approach
11:00 AM
0
0
0
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Street-001
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
8:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Bike Path and Florence Ave , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
0
0
0
CONTROL
500
Bi
k
e
P
a
t
h
AM Peak Hour
Saturday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
70
945 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/7/2014
Florence Ave
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 230 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
100
40 0
000 100
200
200
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 012 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
600 600
400 400
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
5
0
6
0
South Leg
0100
East Leg
North Leg
0
10
9
0
South Leg
East Leg
3
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
6
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
7
0
2
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Sidewalk-010
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Lakewood Blvd and Florence Ave , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
2
0
0
CONTROL
600
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
40
830 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Florence Ave
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 010 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
100
00 0
400 000
200
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 030 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
000 100
600 200
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
1
0
1
0
South Leg
060
East Leg
North Leg
0
3
4
0
South Leg
East Leg
3
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
1
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
9
0
8
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Sidewalk-009
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Woodruff Ave and Imperial Hwy , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
8
0
0
CONTROL
000
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
20
730 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Imperial Hwy
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 120 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
100
60 0
000 100
200
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 341 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
1000 800
200 300
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
3
0
3
0
South Leg
0120
East Leg
North Leg
0
11
11
0
South Leg
East Leg
8
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
3
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
8
0
5
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Sidewalk-008
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Lakewood Blvd and Firestone Blvd , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
5
0
0
CONTROL
1000
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
30
715 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Firestone Blvd
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 000 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
100
20 0
000 000
400
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 002 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
200 300
400 600
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
0
0
0
0
South Leg
060
East Leg
North Leg
0
9
2
0
South Leg
East Leg
2
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
0
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
1
0
1
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Sidewalk-007
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Brookshire Ave and Firestone Blvd , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
1
0
0
CONTROL
200
Br
o
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
60
730 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Firestone Blvd
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 100 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
100
10 0
000 100
400
100
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 041 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
200 300
500 500
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
1
0
2
0
South Leg
070
East Leg
North Leg
0
8
7
0
South Leg
East Leg
5
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
2
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
6
0
5
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Sidewalk-006
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Lakewood Blvd and Imperial Hwy , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
5
0
0
CONTROL
200
La
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
50
700 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Imperial Hwy
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 020 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
100
50 0
200 000
100
100
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 010 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
500 600
400 100
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
2
0
3
0
South Leg
090
East Leg
North Leg
0
7
4
0
South Leg
East Leg
1
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
3
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
6
0
4
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Sidewalk-005
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Paramount Blvd and Firestone Blvd , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
4
0
0
CONTROL
500
Pa
r
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
10
730 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Firestone Blvd
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 001 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
100
00 0
400 000
100
100
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 071 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
000 100
600 300
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
1
0
1
0
South Leg
060
East Leg
North Leg
0
4
9
0
South Leg
East Leg
8
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
1
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
13
0
12
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Sidewalk-004
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Paramount Blvd and Stewart and Gray Rd , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
12
0
0
CONTROL
000
Pa
r
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
30
700 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Stewart and Gray Rd
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 010 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
200
20 0
000 000
500
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 040 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
200 400
500 500
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
1
0
1
0
South Leg
070
East Leg
North Leg
0
9
5
0
South Leg
East Leg
4
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
1
0
0
Northbound Approach
10:00 AM
7
0
6
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Sidewalk-003
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
7:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Paramount Blvd and Imperial Hwy , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
6
0
0
CONTROL
200
Pa
r
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
AM Peak Hour
Thursday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
50
700 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/12/2014
Imperial Hwy
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 100 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
200
20 0
000 100
100
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 001 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
300 500
100 200
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM 00
1
0
1
0
South Leg
040
East Leg
North Leg
0
7
2
0
South Leg
East Leg
1
00
00
West Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
1
0
0
Northbound Approach
11:00 AM
3
0
2
0
Total Volume Per Leg
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Sidewalk-002
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
8:00 AM
Day:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Bike Path and Firestone Blvd , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
2
0
0
CONTROL
300
Bi
k
e
P
a
t
h
AM Peak Hour
Saturday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Downey
Date:
20
845 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/7/2014
Firestone Blvd
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
Lanes City:
AM 100 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
AM NOONPM AMNOONPM Lanes
000
10 0
000 000
800
000
Lanes AM NOONPM AMNOONPM
AM 000 AM
NOON 000 NOON
PM 0 00 PM
Lanes
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
200 100
800 800
AMNOONPM AMNOONPM
AM AM
NOON NOON
PM PM
Date:
80
1000 AM
Peak Hour Summary
Southbound Approach Project #:6/7/2014
Florence Ave
200
Bi
k
e
P
a
t
h
AM Peak Hour
Saturday
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
DowneyDay:
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
Bike Path and Florence Ave , Downey
PM Peak Hour
0
0
0
0
CONTROL
Count Periods
AM
Start
14-5396 Sidewalk-001
NOON Peak Hour
NOON
PM
8:00 AM11:00 AM
1
0
0
0
Total Volume Per Leg
0
West Leg
0
End
Total Ins & Outs
North Leg
0
0
0
Northbound Approach
South Leg
East Leg
0
00
00
West Leg
South Leg
0100
East Leg
North Leg
0
9
0
0
00
1
0
0
0
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_001e
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
3
1
4
16
1
6
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
56
01
:
0
0
1
6
8
8
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
02
:
0
0
0
5
7
7
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
03
:
0
0
2
8
8
8
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
04
:
0
0
7
1
0
1
2
1
3
7
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
52
05
:
0
0
18
3
2
4
2
3
9
1
6
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
153
06
:
0
0
33
6
5
8
0
7
3
2
4
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
288
07
:
0
0
91
1
1
2
1
4
7
1
1
9
5
1
1
6
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
544
08
:
0
0
73
1
0
8
1
2
4
1
0
9
4
9
1
4
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
483
09
:
0
0
50
7
9
1
0
6
8
5
3
4
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
369
10
:
0
0
47
7
1
9
0
9
0
3
6
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
348
11
:
0
0
56
1
0
0
1
1
8
1
0
0
3
9
1
1
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
431
12
:
0
0
P
M
81
1
0
4
1
2
5
9
9
4
4
1
2
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
472
13
:
0
0
56
1
0
4
1
2
8
1
0
0
4
6
1
3
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
453
14
:
0
0
85
1
1
8
1
2
8
1
1
8
4
1
1
7
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
513
15
:
0
0
10
4
1
2
6
1
4
2
1
1
2
4
5
1
7
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
550
16
:
0
0
13
3
1
5
5
1
7
0
1
3
3
5
0
3
1
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
681
17
:
0
0
18
2
1
8
1
1
8
9
1
3
7
5
3
2
6
5
4
0
0
0
0
0
777
18
:
0
0
14
2
1
6
3
1
7
5
1
3
6
5
1
2
4
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
700
19
:
0
0
93
1
1
4
1
1
8
1
0
0
3
9
1
4
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
482
20
:
0
0
55
83
90
87
30
11
3
0
0
0
0
00359
21
:
0
0
28
7
9
7
7
5
7
2
0
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
271
22
:
0
0
21
5
4
5
5
4
9
1
5
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
200
23
:
0
0
12
32
31
31
8
5
1
0
0
0
0
00120
13
7
3
1
9
2
3
2
1
8
6
1
8
2
6
7
1
1
2
6
9
7
7
1
6
8381
16
%
2
3
%
2
6
%
2
2
%
8
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
100%
38
1
6
1
0
7
5
8
6
6
7
2
6
9
8
6
2
8
4
0
0
0
002803
5%
7
%
9
%
8
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
33%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
07:00
91
1
1
2
1
4
7
1
1
9
5
1
1
6
7
2
544
99
2
1
3
1
3
1
4
2
8
1
1
5
9
4
4
2
1
8
3
4
9
1
2
0
0
0
005578
12
%
1
6
%
1
7
%
1
4
%
5
%
2
%
1
%
0
%
67%
17
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
17:00
18
2
1
8
1
1
8
9
1
3
7
5
3
3
1
8
4
777
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
10
2
7
12
%
9
2
5
11
%
1
4
5
8
17
%
4
9
7
1
59%
Ea
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
We
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
%
P
M
%
A
M
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Ga
r
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
w
/
o
L
a
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
SP
E
E
D
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Ea
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Vo
l
u
m
e
Vo
l
u
m
e
15
t
h
14 24
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
To
t
a
l
s
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
95
t
h
35 45
50t
h
22 33
Av
e
r
a
g
e
22 33
ADT 8381 7602
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Ga
r
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
Ga
r
de
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
85
t
h
29 41
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_001w
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
4
5
14
1
8
2
0
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
76
01
:
0
0
0
2
6
7
1
5
1
2
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
49
02
:
0
0
0
0
3
8
1
0
9
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
38
03
:
0
0
0
0
2
4
6
6
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
21
04
:
0
0
0
1
3
1
0
1
5
8
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
43
05
:
0
0
2
5
9
1
7
2
9
2
7
2
0
5
2
0
0
0
0
116
06
:
0
0
3
1
5
2
0
4
1
5
7
6
5
4
2
1
7
5
1
0
0
0
266
07
:
0
0
20
3
9
7
1
1
1
9
1
4
9
1
2
2
7
4
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
617
08
:
0
0
12
3
2
4
9
8
4
1
0
9
9
9
5
6
1
1
3
0
0
0
0
455
09
:
0
0
5
9
2
6
5
5
6
3
6
1
3
2
1
3
3
0
0
0
0
267
10
:
0
0
3
1
0
2
4
3
8
6
2
6
3
3
4
2
1
4
1
0
0
0
260
11
:
0
0
5
9
2
8
6
2
7
5
5
9
4
7
1
6
5
0
0
0
0
306
12
:
0
0
P
M
5
1
2
3
7
6
5
8
7
8
1
5
4
1
6
5
0
0
0
0
362
13
:
0
0
7
2
2
5
2
7
9
1
0
7
1
0
1
5
4
1
7
2
0
0
0
0
441
14
:
0
0
7
2
1
4
4
7
8
1
0
6
9
5
5
8
1
1
5
1
0
0
0
426
15
:
0
0
9
2
2
5
4
9
7
1
4
0
1
1
2
8
1
2
1
9
0
0
0
0
545
16
:
0
0
7
2
5
5
6
9
2
1
5
0
1
2
7
7
9
1
8
3
1
0
0
0
558
17
:
0
0
12
4
2
7
0
1
0
6
1
7
4
1
6
6
1
0
4
3
1
7
1
0
0
0
713
18
:
0
0
10
2
6
6
2
1
0
3
1
3
3
1
2
0
6
5
1
9
5
0
0
0
0
543
19
:
0
0
6
2
3
4
2
7
9
8
5
8
0
5
3
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
382
20
:
0
0
4
15
40
75
10
1
10
3
54
14
4
0
0
00410
21
:
0
0
3
1
3
3
2
6
9
9
8
7
7
5
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
355
22
:
0
0
1
1
1
2
2
3
7
6
5
6
0
3
3
1
1
4
1
0
0
0
245
23
:
0
0
0
4
8
14
34
23
19
5
1
0
0
00108
12
1
3
6
2
7
6
5
1
3
5
3
1
8
8
8
1
6
9
6
1
0
4
0
2
9
7
7
4
6
7602
2%
5
%
1
0
%
1
8
%
2
5
%
2
2
%
1
4
%
4
%
1
%
0
%
100%
50
1
2
6
2
4
6
4
5
9
6
0
8
5
5
1
3
3
6
1
1
1
2
5
2
0
002514
1%
2
%
3
%
6
%
8
%
7
%
4
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
33%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
1
0
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
07:00
20
3
9
7
1
1
1
9
1
4
9
1
2
2
7
4
2
1
5
1
617
71
2
3
6
5
1
9
8
9
4
1
2
8
0
1
1
4
5
7
0
4
1
8
6
4
9
4
0
005088
1%
3
%
7
%
1
2
%
1
7
%
1
5
%
9
%
2
%
1
%
0
%
67%
17
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
17:00
12
4
2
7
0
1
0
6
1
7
4
1
6
6
1
0
4
3
1
9
1
713
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
10
7
2
14
%
8
0
3
11
%
1
2
7
1
17
%
4
4
5
6
59%
Ea
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
We
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
15
t
h
24
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
14
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Ga
r
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
w
/
o
L
a
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
We
st
B
o
u
n
d
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
95
t
h
35 45
50
t
h
22 33
Av
e
r
a
g
e
22 33
ADT 8381 7602
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Ga
r
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
Ga
r
de
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
85
t
h
29 41
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_001
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
3
1
8
21
3
0
2
3
2
2
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
132
01
:
0
0
1
8
1
4
1
5
1
8
1
3
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
76
02
:
0
0
0
5
1
0
1
5
1
3
1
0
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
61
03
:
0
0
2
8
1
0
1
2
8
7
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
50
04
:
0
0
7
1
1
1
5
2
3
2
2
1
0
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
95
05
:
0
0
20
3
7
5
1
5
6
4
5
3
1
2
2
5
2
0
0
0
0
269
06
:
0
0
36
8
0
1
0
0
1
1
4
8
1
7
6
4
4
1
7
5
1
0
0
0
554
07
:
0
0
11
1
1
5
1
2
1
8
2
3
8
2
0
0
1
3
8
8
1
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
1161
08
:
0
0
85
1
4
0
1
7
3
1
9
3
1
5
8
1
1
3
6
1
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
938
09
:
0
0
55
8
8
1
3
2
1
4
0
9
7
7
4
3
4
1
3
3
0
0
0
0
636
10
:
0
0
50
8
1
1
1
4
1
2
8
9
8
7
3
3
8
2
1
4
1
0
0
0
608
11
:
0
0
61
1
0
9
1
4
6
1
6
2
1
1
4
7
0
5
2
1
8
5
0
0
0
0
737
12
:
0
0
P
M
86
1
1
6
1
6
2
1
6
4
1
3
1
9
3
6
0
1
7
5
0
0
0
0
834
13
:
0
0
63
1
2
6
1
8
0
1
7
9
1
5
3
1
1
4
5
9
1
8
2
0
0
0
0
894
14
:
0
0
92
1
3
9
1
7
2
1
9
6
1
4
7
1
1
2
6
1
1
4
5
1
0
0
0
939
15
:
0
0
11
3
1
4
8
1
9
6
2
0
9
1
8
5
1
2
9
8
5
2
1
9
0
0
0
0
1095
16
:
0
0
14
0
1
8
0
2
2
6
2
2
5
2
0
0
1
5
8
8
7
1
9
3
1
0
0
0
1239
17
:
0
0
19
4
2
2
3
2
5
9
2
4
3
2
2
7
1
9
2
1
0
9
3
5
7
1
0
0
0
1490
18
:
0
0
15
2
1
8
9
2
3
7
2
3
9
1
8
4
1
4
4
7
3
2
0
5
0
0
0
0
1243
19
:
0
0
99
1
3
7
1
6
0
1
7
9
1
2
4
9
4
5
6
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
864
20
:
0
0
59
98
13
0
16
2
13
1
11
4
57
14
4
0
0
00769
21
:
0
0
31
9
2
1
0
9
1
2
6
1
1
8
8
5
5
2
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
626
22
:
0
0
22
6
5
7
7
8
6
8
0
6
5
3
4
1
1
4
1
0
0
0
445
23
:
0
0
12
36
39
45
42
28
20
5
1
0
0
00228
14
9
4
2
2
8
5
2
9
5
1
3
1
7
9
2
5
9
9
1
9
6
5
1
1
1
7
3
1
3
7
4
6
15983
9%
1
4
%
1
8
%
2
0
%
1
6
%
1
2
%
7
%
2
%
0
%
0
%
100%
43
1
7
3
6
1
0
0
4
1
1
2
6
8
7
7
6
3
7
3
6
4
1
1
5
2
5
2
0
005317
3%
5
%
6
%
7
%
5
%
4
%
2
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
33%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
07:00
11
1
1
5
1
2
1
8
2
3
8
2
0
0
1
3
8
8
1
2
1
5
1
1161
10
6
3
1
5
4
9
1
9
4
7
2
0
5
3
1
7
2
2
1
3
2
8
7
5
3
1
9
8
4
9
4
0
0010666
7%
1
0
%
1
2
%
1
3
%
1
1
%
8
%
5
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
67%
17
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
17:00
19
4
2
2
3
2
5
9
2
4
3
2
2
7
1
9
2
1
0
9
3
5
9
1
1490
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
20
9
9
13
%
1
7
2
8
11
%
2
7
2
9
17
%
9
4
2
7
59%
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Ga
r
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
w
/
o
L
a
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Su
mm
a
r
y
27
Av
e
r
a
g
e
27
15
t
h
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
17
ADT 15983
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Ga
r
d
e
n
d
a
l
e
S
t
85
t
h
38
95
t
h
43
50
t
h
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_002e
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
1
0
2
7
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
01
:
0
0
0
1
2
4
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
02
:
0
0
0
2
2
4
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
03
:
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
04
:
0
0
0
2
0
4
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
05
:
0
0
0
0
3
4
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
06
:
0
0
0
4
6
1
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
07
:
0
0
3
1
2
2
3
6
5
5
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
165
08
:
0
0
4
7
1
6
3
0
2
7
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
88
09
:
0
0
2
3
1
1
3
4
2
5
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
79
10
:
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
2
2
2
4
6
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
74
11
:
0
0
1
4
2
2
4
7
3
3
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
116
12
:
0
0
P
M
1
9
1
5
4
0
3
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
110
13
:
0
0
3
1
4
1
7
5
6
5
0
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
148
14
:
0
0
4
1
6
2
7
5
3
3
3
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
139
15
:
0
0
1
4
2
7
7
5
3
6
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
151
16
:
0
0
0
7
2
5
7
2
5
9
1
5
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
180
17
:
0
0
2
1
6
2
4
7
3
5
2
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
182
18
:
0
0
3
1
2
1
9
6
4
4
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
152
19
:
0
0
1
7
1
9
4
8
4
7
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
134
20
:
0
0
1
10
17
41
23
3
0
0
0
0
0
0095
21
:
0
0
3
3
2
4
4
2
3
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
107
22
:
0
0
3
3
1
6
1
7
9
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
23
:
0
0
2
5
7
8
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0028
35
1
5
2
3
3
6
8
2
2
5
9
9
1
3
8
8
3
1
2094
2%
7
%
1
6
%
3
9
%
2
9
%
7
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
100%
11
4
6
9
9
2
3
3
1
8
1
4
4
1
2
1
0
0
00618
1%
2
%
5
%
1
1
%
9
%
2
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
30%
08
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
2
:
0
0
0
2
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
07:00
4
1
2
2
3
6
5
5
1
1
0
1
1
1
165
24
1
0
6
2
3
7
5
8
9
4
1
8
9
4
7
1
0
0
0
001476
1%
5
%
1
1
%
2
8
%
2
0
%
4
%
0
%
0
%
70%
14
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
17:00
4
1
6
2
7
7
5
5
9
1
5
3
1
182
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
25
3
12
%
2
5
8
12
%
3
6
2
17
%
1
2
2
1
58%
Ea
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
We
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
ADT 2094 2187
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Al
a
m
e
d
a
S
t
Al
a
me
d
a
S
t
85
t
h
34 34
95
t
h
37 38
50
t
h
28 29
Av
e
r
a
g
e
28 28
15
t
h
22 22
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
To
t
a
l
s
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
SP
E
E
D
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Ea
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Vo
l
u
m
e
Vo
l
u
m
e
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
%
P
M
%
A
M
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Al
a
m
e
d
a
S
t
e
/
o
P
a
r
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_002w
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
1
1
2
6
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
01
:
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
02
:
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
03
:
0
0
1
0
3
2
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
04
:
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
05
:
0
0
2
2
2
6
1
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
06
:
0
0
3
6
9
1
9
1
7
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
59
07
:
0
0
3
6
1
3
7
1
7
0
2
3
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
191
08
:
0
0
0
6
1
0
4
3
5
3
9
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
122
09
:
0
0
1
6
1
2
4
4
3
1
1
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
110
10
:
0
0
0
3
1
1
3
4
2
3
6
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
82
11
:
0
0
3
8
1
6
4
7
4
2
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
130
12
:
0
0
P
M
5
5
1
2
4
5
3
5
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
108
13
:
0
0
6
1
2
1
7
5
7
3
6
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
137
14
:
0
0
5
1
3
3
9
5
5
4
3
6
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
163
15
:
0
0
7
8
2
8
6
8
5
1
1
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
179
16
:
0
0
4
8
1
8
5
4
4
9
1
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
150
17
:
0
0
5
7
2
7
7
1
4
3
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
161
18
:
0
0
3
9
1
8
5
5
5
5
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
151
19
:
0
0
2
3
1
8
5
6
3
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
118
20
:
0
0
0
6
24
37
25
4
1
0
0
0
0
0097
21
:
0
0
1
6
1
9
4
3
1
9
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
91
22
:
0
0
2
9
7
1
3
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
44
23
:
0
0
2
3
6
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0021
56
1
2
7
3
1
2
8
3
6
6
6
8
1
5
6
2
8
3
1
2187
3%
6
%
1
4
%
3
8
%
3
1
%
7
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
100%
14
3
8
7
9
2
7
7
2
6
6
7
3
1
9
1
0
0
0
00767
1%
2
%
4
%
1
3
%
1
2
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
35%
06
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
9
:
0
0
07:00
3
8
1
6
7
1
7
0
2
3
5
1
191
42
8
9
2
3
3
5
5
9
4
0
2
8
3
9
2
1
0
0
001420
2%
4
%
1
1
%
2
6
%
1
8
%
4
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
65%
15
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
15:00
7
1
3
3
9
7
1
5
5
1
4
3
1
1
179
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
31
3
14
%
2
4
5
11
%
3
1
1
14
%
1
3
1
8
60%
Ea
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
We
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
ADT 2094 2187
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Al
a
m
e
d
a
S
t
Al
a
me
d
a
S
t
85
t
h
34 34
95
t
h
37 38
50
t
h
28 29
Av
e
r
a
g
e
28 28
15
t
h
22
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
22
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Al
a
m
e
d
a
S
t
e
/
o
P
a
r
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
We
st
B
o
u
n
d
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_002
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
2
1
4
13
8
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
01
:
0
0
0
1
3
6
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
02
:
0
0
0
2
2
5
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
14
03
:
0
0
1
1
4
4
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
04
:
0
0
0
2
0
6
6
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
05
:
0
0
2
2
5
1
0
1
5
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
39
06
:
0
0
3
1
0
1
5
2
9
2
7
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
92
07
:
0
0
6
1
8
3
6
1
3
6
1
2
1
3
3
5
0
1
0
0
0
0
356
08
:
0
0
4
1
3
2
6
7
3
8
0
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
210
09
:
0
0
3
9
2
3
7
8
5
6
1
7
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
189
10
:
0
0
0
1
3
2
2
5
6
4
7
1
2
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
156
11
:
0
0
4
1
2
3
8
9
4
7
5
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
246
12
:
0
0
P
M
6
1
4
2
7
8
5
6
7
1
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
218
13
:
0
0
9
2
6
3
4
1
1
3
8
6
1
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
285
14
:
0
0
9
2
9
6
6
1
0
8
7
6
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
302
15
:
0
0
8
1
2
5
5
1
4
3
8
7
2
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
330
16
:
0
0
4
1
5
4
3
1
2
6
1
0
8
2
8
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
330
17
:
0
0
7
2
3
5
1
1
4
4
9
5
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
343
18
:
0
0
6
2
1
3
7
1
1
9
9
5
2
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
303
19
:
0
0
3
1
0
3
7
1
0
4
7
7
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
252
20
:
0
0
1
16
41
78
48
7
1
0
0
0
0
00192
21
:
0
0
4
9
4
3
8
5
5
0
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
198
22
:
0
0
5
1
2
2
3
3
0
2
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
23
:
0
0
4
8
13
13
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0049
91
2
7
9
6
4
8
1
6
5
8
1
2
6
7
2
9
4
3
6
6
2
4281
2%
7
%
1
5
%
3
9
%
3
0
%
7
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
100%
25
8
4
1
7
8
5
1
0
4
4
7
1
1
7
2
0
3
1
0
0
001385
1%
2
%
4
%
1
2
%
1
0
%
3
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
32%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
2
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
07:00
6
1
8
3
8
1
3
6
1
2
1
3
3
5
1
1
356
66
1
9
5
4
7
0
1
1
4
8
8
2
0
1
7
7
1
6
3
1
0
0
002896
2%
5
%
1
1
%
2
7
%
1
9
%
4
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
68%
13
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
17:00
9
2
9
6
6
1
4
4
1
0
8
2
8
4
2
1
343
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
56
6
13
%
5
0
3
12
%
6
7
3
16
%
2
5
3
9
59%
Su
m
m
a
r
y
ADT 4281
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Al
a
m
e
d
a
S
t
85
t
h
34
95
t
h
37
50
t
h
28
Av
e
r
a
g
e
28
15
t
h
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
22
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Al
a
m
e
d
a
S
t
e
/
o
P
a
r
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Su
mm
a
r
y
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_003e
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
8
1
4
2
8
1
2
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
67
01
:
0
0
0
5
8
1
9
9
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
45
02
:
0
0
0
5
8
1
2
7
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
34
03
:
0
0
1
7
1
1
1
6
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
46
04
:
0
0
3
7
1
6
2
9
1
5
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
74
05
:
0
0
4
2
0
4
0
6
5
4
4
9
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
183
06
:
0
0
5
2
7
6
3
1
1
0
8
0
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
300
07
:
0
0
12
7
7
1
4
3
2
3
7
1
5
0
2
7
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
649
08
:
0
0
18
7
7
1
3
9
2
0
6
1
1
9
2
4
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
588
09
:
0
0
14
7
9
1
5
0
1
8
5
1
0
5
1
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
551
10
:
0
0
21
8
7
1
3
6
1
7
3
9
8
1
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
533
11
:
0
0
33
1
3
2
2
0
5
2
4
9
1
5
6
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
798
12
:
0
0
P
M
26
1
0
0
2
1
3
2
3
2
9
7
1
9
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
688
13
:
0
0
17
9
3
1
8
6
2
3
1
1
1
9
1
8
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
668
14
:
0
0
25
1
1
0
2
0
0
2
8
5
1
6
1
2
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
807
15
:
0
0
22
9
6
2
2
1
3
1
8
1
7
9
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
867
16
:
0
0
21
9
1
1
9
3
3
3
4
1
7
9
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
842
17
:
0
0
43
1
2
5
2
1
1
2
8
2
1
5
0
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
843
18
:
0
0
17
1
0
4
1
9
4
2
9
1
1
8
7
2
8
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
825
19
:
0
0
24
7
6
1
6
7
2
3
7
1
3
5
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
661
20
:
0
0
15
68
11
4
17
4
88
16
1
0
0
0
0
00476
21
:
0
0
3
4
4
1
0
3
1
1
2
5
4
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
329
22
:
0
0
2
1
7
4
6
8
4
5
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
212
23
:
0
0
1
10
34
41
24
3
0
0
0
0
0
00113
32
7
1
4
6
5
2
8
1
5
3
9
5
0
2
2
3
1
3
7
3
3
8
11199
3%
1
3
%
2
5
%
3
5
%
2
0
%
3
%
0
%
100%
11
1
5
3
1
9
3
3
1
3
2
9
8
0
5
1
4
0
1
9
0
0
0
0
003868
1%
5
%
8
%
1
2
%
7
%
1
%
0
%
35%
11
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
11:00
33
1
3
2
2
0
5
2
4
9
1
5
6
2
7
5
798
21
6
9
3
4
1
8
8
2
2
6
2
1
1
4
2
6
2
3
3
1
9
0
0
0
0
007331
2%
8
%
1
7
%
2
3
%
1
3
%
2
%
0
%
65%
17
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
15:00
43
1
2
5
2
2
1
3
3
4
1
8
7
3
0
4
867
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
12
3
7
11
%
1
3
5
6
12
%
1
6
8
5
15
%
6
9
2
1
62%
Ea
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
We
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
ADT 11199 11082
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
St
e
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
St
e
wa
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
85
t
h
32 40
95
t
h
35 44
50
t
h
26 34
Av
e
r
a
g
e
26 34
15
t
h
20 27
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
To
t
a
l
s
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
SP
E
E
D
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Ea
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Vo
l
u
m
e
Vo
l
u
m
e
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
%
P
M
%
A
M
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
St
e
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
e
/
o
P
a
r
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_003w
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
0
1
4
9
3
7
2
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
81
01
:
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
5
1
0
6
2
1
0
0
0
47
02
:
0
0
0
0
1
4
1
0
1
5
3
6
4
1
0
0
0
44
03
:
0
0
0
0
2
4
1
0
9
7
3
2
0
0
0
0
37
04
:
0
0
0
1
2
9
2
1
2
9
1
4
8
2
0
0
0
0
86
05
:
0
0
1
2
7
2
4
5
7
7
2
2
6
1
2
9
0
0
0
0
210
06
:
0
0
1
3
1
3
3
8
9
0
1
0
1
4
6
1
9
4
2
0
0
0
317
07
:
0
0
5
1
2
4
4
1
3
4
2
6
4
2
2
5
8
2
2
0
6
2
0
0
0
794
08
:
0
0
2
6
2
2
6
7
1
8
4
1
7
9
6
8
2
3
3
2
0
0
0
556
09
:
0
0
1
7
1
8
6
0
1
5
0
1
6
1
6
7
2
0
3
1
0
0
0
488
10
:
0
0
2
4
1
6
6
1
1
7
1
1
6
5
6
3
1
5
4
0
0
0
0
501
11
:
0
0
1
7
2
1
9
8
1
9
6
1
7
4
8
4
1
9
1
2
0
0
0
603
12
:
0
0
P
M
1
6
3
1
9
4
2
0
5
1
9
8
8
2
1
2
3
1
0
0
0
633
13
:
0
0
2
9
1
8
1
1
0
2
5
6
2
1
3
7
4
1
4
2
0
0
0
0
698
14
:
0
0
5
1
4
6
0
1
3
0
2
6
1
2
1
7
5
4
1
4
1
0
0
0
0
756
15
:
0
0
14
1
9
4
1
1
7
3
2
7
1
1
8
4
5
1
9
1
0
0
0
0
763
16
:
0
0
7
3
1
7
1
1
8
1
2
8
7
1
8
4
4
9
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
825
17
:
0
0
3
1
5
4
9
1
4
4
2
5
0
2
1
7
6
7
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
757
18
:
0
0
3
1
1
4
9
1
2
1
2
6
1
1
7
8
4
4
6
1
2
0
0
0
676
19
:
0
0
3
5
3
9
1
6
1
2
4
5
1
6
4
4
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
665
20
:
0
0
1
10
59
16
9
28
2
14
8
26
3
0
0
0
00698
21
:
0
0
0
4
2
7
8
6
1
7
5
1
0
2
4
1
7
0
0
0
0
0
442
22
:
0
0
2
1
5
1
6
7
7
9
8
5
3
9
3
1
0
0
0
265
23
:
0
0
0
0
4
7
46
46
28
8
0
1
0
00140
54
1
6
7
6
0
0
1
8
9
7
3
7
8
9
3
1
3
1
1
0
9
9
2
7
0
5
9
1
6
11082
0%
2
%
5
%
1
7
%
3
4
%
2
8
%
1
0
%
2
%
1
%
0
%
100%
13
4
2
1
4
7
5
0
5
1
1
7
3
1
1
8
2
4
9
0
1
5
6
4
5
1
1
0
003764
0%
0
%
1
%
5
%
1
1
%
1
1
%
4
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
34%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
0
5
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
07:00
5
1
2
4
4
1
3
4
2
6
4
2
2
5
8
4
2
3
9
2
794
41
1
2
5
4
5
3
1
3
9
2
2
6
1
6
1
9
4
9
6
0
9
1
1
4
1
4
5
0
007318
0%
1
%
4
%
1
3
%
2
4
%
1
8
%
5
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
66%
15
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
16:00
14
3
1
7
1
1
8
1
2
8
7
2
1
7
8
2
1
4
3
2
825
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
13
5
0
12
%
1
3
3
1
12
%
1
5
8
2
14
%
6
8
1
9
62%
Ea
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
We
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
ADT 11199 11082
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
St
e
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
St
e
wa
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
85
t
h
32 40
95
t
h
35 44
50
t
h
26 34
Av
e
r
a
g
e
26 34
15
t
h
27
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
20
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
St
e
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
e
/
o
P
a
r
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
We
st
B
o
u
n
d
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_003
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
8
1
5
3
2
2
1
4
1
2
1
5
5
0
0
0
0
148
01
:
0
0
0
5
8
2
1
2
0
1
8
1
1
6
2
1
0
0
0
92
02
:
0
0
0
5
9
1
6
1
7
1
7
3
6
4
1
0
0
0
78
03
:
0
0
1
7
1
3
2
0
2
0
1
0
7
3
2
0
0
0
0
83
04
:
0
0
3
8
1
8
3
8
3
6
3
2
1
5
8
2
0
0
0
0
160
05
:
0
0
5
2
2
4
7
8
9
1
0
1
8
1
2
7
1
2
9
0
0
0
0
393
06
:
0
0
6
3
0
7
6
1
4
8
1
7
0
1
1
4
4
8
1
9
4
2
0
0
0
617
07
:
0
0
17
8
9
1
8
7
3
7
1
4
1
4
2
5
2
8
5
2
0
6
2
0
0
0
1443
08
:
0
0
20
8
3
1
6
1
2
7
3
3
0
3
2
0
3
7
3
2
3
3
2
0
0
0
1144
09
:
0
0
15
8
6
1
6
8
2
4
5
2
5
5
1
7
7
6
9
2
0
3
1
0
0
0
1039
10
:
0
0
23
9
1
1
5
2
2
3
4
2
6
9
1
8
2
6
4
1
5
4
0
0
0
0
1034
11
:
0
0
34
1
3
9
2
2
6
3
4
7
3
5
2
1
9
5
8
6
1
9
1
2
0
0
0
1401
12
:
0
0
P
M
27
1
0
6
2
4
4
3
2
6
3
0
2
2
1
7
8
3
1
2
3
1
0
0
0
1321
13
:
0
0
19
1
0
2
2
0
4
3
4
1
3
7
5
2
3
1
7
8
1
4
2
0
0
0
0
1366
14
:
0
0
30
1
2
4
2
6
0
4
1
5
4
2
2
2
4
3
5
4
1
4
1
0
0
0
0
1563
15
:
0
0
36
1
1
5
2
6
2
4
9
1
4
5
0
2
1
4
5
2
9
1
0
0
0
0
1630
16
:
0
0
28
1
2
2
2
6
4
5
1
5
4
6
6
2
0
5
5
2
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
1667
17
:
0
0
46
1
4
0
2
6
0
4
2
6
4
0
0
2
4
7
6
9
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1600
18
:
0
0
20
1
1
5
2
4
3
4
1
2
4
4
8
2
0
6
4
8
6
1
2
0
0
0
1501
19
:
0
0
27
8
1
2
0
6
3
9
8
3
8
0
1
8
4
4
2
8
0
0
0
0
0
1326
20
:
0
0
16
78
17
3
34
3
37
0
16
4
27
3
0
0
0
001174
21
:
0
0
3
4
8
1
3
0
1
9
8
2
2
9
1
1
4
4
2
7
0
0
0
0
0
771
22
:
0
0
4
1
8
5
1
1
0
0
1
3
0
1
0
8
5
3
9
3
1
0
0
0
477
23
:
0
0
1
10
38
48
70
49
28
8
0
1
0
00253
38
1
1
6
3
2
3
4
1
5
5
8
4
7
6
0
2
0
3
5
0
4
1
1
3
7
2
7
0
5
9
1
6
22281
2%
7
%
1
5
%
2
6
%
2
7
%
1
6
%
5
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
100%
12
4
5
7
3
1
0
8
0
1
8
3
4
1
9
7
8
1
3
2
2
5
0
9
1
5
6
4
5
1
1
0
007632
1%
3
%
5
%
8
%
9
%
6
%
2
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
34%
11
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
0
5
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
07:00
34
1
3
9
2
2
6
3
7
1
4
1
4
2
5
2
8
6
2
3
9
2
1443
25
7
1
0
5
9
2
3
3
5
4
0
1
3
4
0
4
2
2
1
8
2
6
2
8
1
1
4
1
4
5
0
0014649
1%
5
%
1
0
%
1
8
%
1
8
%
1
0
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
66%
17
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
16:00
46
1
4
0
2
6
4
5
1
5
4
6
6
2
4
7
8
3
1
4
3
2
1667
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
25
8
7
12
%
2
6
8
7
12
%
3
2
6
7
15
%
1
3
7
4
0
62%
Su
m
m
a
r
y
ADT 22281
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
St
e
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
85
t
h
37
95
t
h
42
50
t
h
30
Av
e
r
a
g
e
30
15
t
h
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
22
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
St
e
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
e
/
o
P
a
r
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Su
mm
a
r
y
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_004n
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
2
0
2
7
2
3
2
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
67
01
:
0
0
0
0
5
6
1
2
1
4
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
49
02
:
0
0
0
0
4
4
1
0
1
0
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
33
03
:
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
2
1
2
1
4
5
6
0
0
0
0
53
04
:
0
0
1
0
3
7
2
6
5
1
2
5
9
0
0
0
0
0
122
05
:
0
0
0
1
8
2
0
3
8
6
3
4
5
1
2
4
1
0
0
0
192
06
:
0
0
1
4
2
1
5
8
1
0
7
1
2
5
3
2
1
1
1
2
0
0
0
362
07
:
0
0
13
3
2
6
8
1
5
0
2
1
4
1
2
1
3
1
5
1
0
0
0
0
635
08
:
0
0
4
1
2
6
2
1
1
8
1
7
4
1
0
8
2
2
8
0
0
0
0
0
508
09
:
0
0
2
7
2
4
9
5
1
5
7
9
1
3
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
414
10
:
0
0
6
7
2
6
8
0
1
3
9
1
0
9
3
8
6
3
1
0
0
0
415
11
:
0
0
4
9
5
0
1
2
0
1
6
8
9
1
2
1
5
0
1
0
0
0
469
12
:
0
0
P
M
0
5
2
9
1
0
6
1
5
6
9
2
4
1
8
0
0
0
0
0
437
13
:
0
0
11
2
9
6
0
1
1
7
1
6
6
7
9
1
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
478
14
:
0
0
12
2
7
7
4
1
3
8
1
8
3
1
1
5
3
1
4
2
0
0
0
0
586
15
:
0
0
9
3
1
9
4
1
7
8
1
9
7
1
0
1
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
634
16
:
0
0
11
2
3
8
8
1
8
0
2
1
7
8
9
2
6
1
1
0
0
0
0
636
17
:
0
0
14
3
7
1
0
7
2
0
0
1
9
4
7
1
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
646
18
:
0
0
10
2
6
6
4
1
7
0
1
6
5
7
7
1
9
2
1
0
0
0
0
534
19
:
0
0
6
1
7
6
6
1
5
9
1
4
4
6
5
1
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
474
20
:
0
0
15
23
75
15
4
10
8
50
8
2
0
0
0
00435
21
:
0
0
8
2
0
5
9
9
5
1
0
9
5
6
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
358
22
:
0
0
0
5
2
0
5
1
6
7
4
8
1
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
207
23
:
0
0
2
3
5
20
45
40
10
5
1
0
0
00131
13
1
3
1
8
1
0
1
8
2
2
3
3
2
8
3
1
1
6
9
8
5
1
3
1
0
6
2
2
5
8875
1%
4
%
1
1
%
2
5
%
3
2
%
1
9
%
6
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
100%
33
7
2
2
7
7
6
6
5
1
0
8
0
8
1
5
2
8
6
7
1
1
5
5
0
003319
0%
1
%
3
%
7
%
1
2
%
9
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
37%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
0
5
:
0
0
0
5
:
0
0
0
3
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
07:00
13
3
2
6
8
1
5
0
2
1
4
1
2
5
4
5
1
2
6
2
635
98
2
4
6
7
4
1
1
5
6
8
1
7
5
1
8
8
3
2
2
7
3
5
7
0
0
005556
1%
3
%
8
%
1
8
%
2
0
%
1
0
%
3
%
0
%
0
%
63%
20
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
17:00
15
3
7
1
0
7
2
0
0
2
1
7
1
1
5
4
1
8
2
646
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
11
4
3
13
%
9
1
5
10
%
1
2
8
2
14
%
5
5
3
5
62%
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
So
u
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
ADT 8875 7885
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Ol
d
R
i
v
e
r
R
d
Ol
d
R
i
v
e
r
R
d
85
t
h
38 26
95
t
h
42 32
50
t
h
31 17
Av
e
r
a
g
e
31 18
15
t
h
24 9
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
To
t
a
l
s
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
SP
E
E
D
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Vo
l
u
m
e
Vo
l
u
m
e
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
%
P
M
%
A
M
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Ol
d
R
i
v
e
r
R
d
n
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_004s
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
10
1
7
2
2
1
6
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
72
01
:
0
0
7
1
0
1
4
1
1
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
48
02
:
0
0
4
1
1
6
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
03
:
0
0
5
1
0
1
3
1
1
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
51
04
:
0
0
12
2
1
2
6
1
9
2
4
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
109
05
:
0
0
29
4
2
5
4
4
2
2
5
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
197
06
:
0
0
10
8
1
0
5
7
2
4
4
2
8
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
364
07
:
0
0
22
8
1
6
2
8
6
5
1
2
7
1
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
571
08
:
0
0
18
8
1
4
7
9
5
4
4
2
2
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
503
09
:
0
0
15
0
8
5
6
2
3
1
1
3
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
350
10
:
0
0
17
1
8
1
5
0
3
2
2
4
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
366
11
:
0
0
18
9
1
2
6
6
3
3
6
1
9
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
438
12
:
0
0
P
M
20
6
1
2
7
6
8
3
7
1
5
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
460
13
:
0
0
16
6
1
1
3
5
9
3
9
2
0
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
404
14
:
0
0
20
1
1
2
0
7
2
4
4
2
3
9
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
471
15
:
0
0
19
9
1
2
5
7
4
4
6
2
6
9
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
481
16
:
0
0
20
3
1
3
0
7
9
5
5
2
4
5
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
500
17
:
0
0
24
1
1
4
2
1
0
6
3
9
2
8
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
563
18
:
0
0
22
9
1
3
4
7
4
3
5
2
0
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
499
19
:
0
0
16
2
1
0
1
5
7
3
8
1
7
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
380
20
:
0
0
11
3
12
6
49
37
17
6
1
0
0
0
0
00349
21
:
0
0
10
3
1
1
6
4
8
3
8
2
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
330
22
:
0
0
48
6
4
4
1
4
0
1
1
6
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
213
23
:
0
0
32
43
29
17
8
4
2
0
0
0
0
00135
30
0
4
2
1
5
8
1
3
1
9
8
0
6
4
3
4
1
2
5
3
6
3
7885
38
%
2
7
%
1
7
%
1
0
%
6
%
2
%
0
%
0
%
100%
11
0
1
8
1
7
5
6
3
3
4
1
2
0
5
5
7
1
4
2
0
0
0
003100
14
%
1
0
%
7
%
4
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
39%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
4
:
0
0
0
5
:
0
0
07:00
22
8
1
6
2
9
5
5
1
2
8
1
3
3
1
571
19
0
3
1
3
4
1
7
5
6
4
6
5
2
2
9
6
8
2
2
1
0
0
0
004785
24
%
1
7
%
1
0
%
6
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
61%
17
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
17:00
24
1
1
4
2
1
0
6
5
5
2
8
9
4
1
563
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
10
7
4
14
%
8
6
4
11
%
1
0
6
3
13
%
4
8
8
4
62%
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
So
u
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
ADT 8875 7885
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Ol
d
R
i
v
e
r
R
d
Ol
d
R
i
v
e
r
R
d
85
t
h
38 26
95
t
h
42 32
50
t
h
31 17
Av
e
r
a
g
e
31 18
15
t
h
9
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
24
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Ol
d
R
i
v
e
r
R
d
n
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
So
ut
h
B
o
u
n
d
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_004
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
12
1
7
2
4
2
3
2
9
2
1
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
139
01
:
0
0
7
1
0
1
9
1
7
1
6
1
6
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
97
02
:
0
0
4
1
1
1
0
8
1
3
1
2
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
64
03
:
0
0
5
1
0
1
7
1
1
2
2
1
4
1
4
5
6
0
0
0
0
104
04
:
0
0
13
2
1
2
9
2
6
5
0
5
5
2
8
9
0
0
0
0
0
231
05
:
0
0
29
4
3
6
2
6
2
6
3
6
6
4
6
1
3
4
1
0
0
0
389
06
:
0
0
10
9
1
0
9
9
3
1
0
2
1
3
5
1
3
0
3
4
1
1
1
2
0
0
0
726
07
:
0
0
24
1
1
9
4
1
5
4
2
0
1
2
4
1
1
3
4
3
4
6
1
0
0
0
0
1206
08
:
0
0
19
2
1
5
9
1
5
7
1
6
2
1
9
6
1
1
4
2
3
8
0
0
0
0
0
1011
09
:
0
0
15
2
9
2
8
6
1
2
6
1
7
0
9
9
3
5
4
0
0
0
0
0
764
10
:
0
0
17
7
8
8
7
6
1
1
2
1
6
3
1
1
5
4
0
6
3
1
0
0
0
781
11
:
0
0
19
3
1
3
5
1
1
3
1
5
6
1
8
7
9
6
2
1
5
0
1
0
0
0
907
12
:
0
0
P
M
20
6
1
3
2
9
7
1
4
3
1
7
1
9
8
4
2
8
0
0
0
0
0
897
13
:
0
0
17
7
1
4
2
1
1
9
1
5
6
1
8
6
8
5
1
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
882
14
:
0
0
21
3
1
4
7
1
4
6
1
8
2
2
0
6
1
2
4
3
3
4
2
0
0
0
0
1057
15
:
0
0
20
8
1
5
6
1
6
8
2
2
4
2
2
3
1
1
0
2
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
1115
16
:
0
0
21
4
1
5
3
1
6
7
2
3
5
2
4
1
9
4
3
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1136
17
:
0
0
25
5
1
7
9
2
1
3
2
3
9
2
2
2
7
6
2
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
1209
18
:
0
0
23
9
1
6
0
1
3
8
2
0
5
1
8
5
8
2
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
1033
19
:
0
0
16
8
1
1
8
1
2
3
1
9
7
1
6
1
6
9
1
4
3
1
0
0
0
0
854
20
:
0
0
12
8
14
9
12
4
19
1
12
5
56
9
2
0
0
0
00784
21
:
0
0
11
1
1
3
6
1
0
7
1
3
3
1
2
9
5
9
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
688
22
:
0
0
48
6
9
6
1
9
1
7
8
5
4
1
5
3
1
0
0
0
0
420
23
:
0
0
34
46
34
37
53
44
12
5
1
0
0
00266
31
3
5
2
4
7
6
2
3
3
7
3
0
3
9
3
2
6
5
1
8
2
3
5
4
9
1
0
9
2
2
5
16760
19
%
1
5
%
1
4
%
1
8
%
1
9
%
1
1
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
100%
11
3
4
8
8
9
8
4
0
1
0
0
6
1
2
8
5
8
7
2
3
0
0
7
3
1
5
5
0
006419
7%
5
%
5
%
6
%
8
%
5
%
2
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
38%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
5
:
0
0
0
5
:
0
0
0
3
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
07:00
24
1
1
9
4
1
5
7
2
0
1
2
4
1
1
3
4
4
6
1
3
6
2
1206
20
0
1
1
5
8
7
1
4
9
7
2
0
3
3
1
9
8
0
9
5
1
2
4
9
3
6
7
0
0
0010341
12
%
9
%
9
%
1
2
%
1
2
%
6
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
62%
17
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
17:00
25
5
1
7
9
2
1
3
2
3
9
2
4
1
1
2
4
4
2
8
2
1209
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
22
1
7
13
%
1
7
7
9
11
%
2
3
4
5
14
%
1
0
4
1
9
62%
Su
m
m
a
r
y
ADT 16760
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Ol
d
R
i
v
e
r
R
d
85
t
h
35
95
t
h
40
50
t
h
26
Av
e
r
a
g
e
25
15
t
h
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
13
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Ol
d
R
i
v
e
r
R
d
n
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Su
mm
a
r
y
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_005n
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
1
1
1
6
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
01
:
0
0
0
1
1
1
9
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
02
:
0
0
0
1
2
0
4
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
03
:
0
0
0
0
1
3
3
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
04
:
0
0
0
0
3
2
5
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
05
:
0
0
1
1
5
1
0
2
0
1
7
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
58
06
:
0
0
0
1
7
3
9
5
8
2
7
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
135
07
:
0
0
9
1
2
4
6
1
2
6
1
6
8
4
2
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
412
08
:
0
0
0
5
2
4
9
7
1
3
0
3
4
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
299
09
:
0
0
1
5
1
0
7
3
1
1
1
3
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
233
10
:
0
0
5
8
2
6
8
5
8
0
2
4
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
235
11
:
0
0
3
7
1
1
8
3
1
4
2
3
5
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
288
12
:
0
0
P
M
1
4
1
8
8
0
1
1
9
4
1
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
270
13
:
0
0
6
8
2
0
9
0
1
1
4
3
8
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
279
14
:
0
0
21
2
3
4
1
1
0
3
8
8
2
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
306
15
:
0
0
25
1
0
2
4
1
0
4
1
1
6
2
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
305
16
:
0
0
3
2
1
3
1
0
1
1
5
7
3
8
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
322
17
:
0
0
3
1
3
2
5
9
3
1
6
1
4
2
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
343
18
:
0
0
2
3
2
5
1
1
4
1
2
1
3
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
301
19
:
0
0
1
8
1
3
1
0
1
1
0
4
2
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
253
20
:
0
0
1
6
20
83
49
10
2
1
0
0
0
00172
21
:
0
0
0
3
1
2
6
1
5
0
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
140
22
:
0
0
0
3
7
2
3
3
5
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
81
23
:
0
0
1
5
2
6
16
7
1
0
0
0
0
0038
84
1
3
0
3
5
7
1
4
8
4
1
8
6
8
5
2
8
8
7
5
4543
2%
3
%
8
%
3
3
%
4
1
%
1
2
%
2
%
0
%
100%
20
4
2
1
3
7
5
2
5
7
3
8
2
2
6
4
4
1
0
0
0
001733
0%
1
%
3
%
1
2
%
1
6
%
5
%
1
%
0
%
38%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
1
0
:
0
0
07:00
9
1
2
4
6
1
2
6
1
6
8
4
2
9
1
412
64
8
8
2
2
0
9
5
9
1
1
3
0
3
0
2
4
3
4
0
0
0
002810
1%
2
%
5
%
2
1
%
2
5
%
7
%
1
%
0
%
62%
15
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
17:00
25
2
3
4
1
1
1
4
1
6
1
4
2
7
1
343
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
71
1
16
%
5
4
9
12
%
6
6
5
15
%
2
6
1
8
58%
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
So
u
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
%
P
M
%
A
M
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Ri
v
e
s
A
v
e
s
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
SP
E
E
D
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Vo
l
u
m
e
Vo
l
u
m
e
15
t
h
25 25
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
To
t
a
l
s
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
95
t
h
39 35
50t
h
31 28
Av
e
r
a
g
e
30 29
ADT 4543 4655
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Ri
v
e
s
A
v
e
Ri
v
es
A
v
e
85
t
h
35 33
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_005s
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
0
6
15
1
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
35
01
:
0
0
0
0
3
5
4
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
02
:
0
0
0
0
2
5
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
03
:
0
0
1
0
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
04
:
0
0
0
0
0
4
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
05
:
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
6
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
06
:
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
4
2
3
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
65
07
:
0
0
2
5
3
6
1
4
0
8
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
276
08
:
0
0
2
0
3
0
1
2
2
5
7
6
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
220
09
:
0
0
2
2
2
5
9
3
6
0
6
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
191
10
:
0
0
3
1
1
2
7
9
2
7
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
214
11
:
0
0
1
3
3
0
1
4
0
9
3
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
281
12
:
0
0
P
M
0
4
4
4
1
7
4
9
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
325
13
:
0
0
3
1
5
3
1
7
3
1
0
2
7
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
341
14
:
0
0
1
1
4
0
1
9
4
9
9
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
346
15
:
0
0
1
7
4
1
1
7
9
1
0
7
7
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
343
16
:
0
0
0
4
4
5
1
5
8
1
2
3
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
351
17
:
0
0
0
1
5
0
1
9
5
1
2
9
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
389
18
:
0
0
2
3
4
1
1
7
3
9
7
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
330
19
:
0
0
1
3
3
6
1
3
7
8
5
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
274
20
:
0
0
0
4
53
13
7
59
4
1
0
0
0
0
00258
21
:
0
0
0
3
3
4
9
7
5
3
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
195
22
:
0
0
0
0
1
6
5
4
2
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
23
:
0
0
2
0
13
23
14
4
0
0
0
0
0
0056
21
5
3
6
4
0
2
3
4
6
1
3
9
5
1
7
9
2
0
1
4655
0%
1
%
1
4
%
5
0
%
3
0
%
4
%
0
%
0
%
100%
11
2
2
1
7
4
6
5
2
4
1
2
6
3
1
3
0
0
0
0
001347
0%
0
%
4
%
1
4
%
9
%
1
%
0
%
29%
10
:
0
0
1
0
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
11:00
3
1
1
3
6
1
4
0
9
3
1
4
3
281
10
3
1
4
6
6
1
6
9
4
9
8
3
1
1
6
7
1
0
0
0
003308
0%
1
%
1
0
%
3
6
%
2
1
%
2
%
0
%
0
%
71%
13
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
17:00
3
7
5
3
1
9
5
1
2
9
2
0
2
1
389
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
49
6
11
%
6
6
6
14
%
7
4
0
16
%
2
7
5
3
59%
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
So
u
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
ur
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
15
t
h
25
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
25
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Ri
v
e
s
A
v
e
s
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
So
ut
h
B
o
u
n
d
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
95
t
h
39 35
50
t
h
31 28
Av
e
r
a
g
e
30 29
ADT 4543 4655
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Ri
v
e
s
A
v
e
Ri
v
es
A
v
e
85
t
h
35 33
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_005
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
1
1
7
21
1
9
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
54
01
:
0
0
0
1
4
6
1
3
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
02
:
0
0
0
1
4
5
6
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
03
:
0
0
1
0
3
4
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
04
:
0
0
0
0
3
6
7
7
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
05
:
0
0
1
1
8
2
1
2
6
1
9
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
81
06
:
0
0
0
2
1
7
6
3
8
1
3
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
200
07
:
0
0
11
1
7
8
2
2
6
6
2
4
9
5
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
688
08
:
0
0
2
5
5
4
2
1
9
1
8
7
4
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
519
09
:
0
0
3
7
3
5
1
6
6
1
7
1
3
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
424
10
:
0
0
8
1
9
5
3
1
7
7
1
5
0
3
5
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
449
11
:
0
0
4
1
0
4
1
2
2
3
2
3
5
4
9
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
569
12
:
0
0
P
M
1
8
6
2
2
5
4
2
0
9
5
3
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
595
13
:
0
0
9
9
7
3
2
6
3
2
1
6
4
5
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
620
14
:
0
0
22
2
4
8
1
2
9
7
1
8
7
3
8
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
652
15
:
0
0
26
1
7
6
5
2
8
3
2
2
3
3
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
648
16
:
0
0
3
6
5
8
2
5
9
2
8
0
5
8
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
673
17
:
0
0
3
1
4
7
5
2
8
8
2
9
0
5
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
732
18
:
0
0
4
6
6
6
2
8
7
2
1
8
4
3
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
631
19
:
0
0
2
1
1
4
9
2
3
8
1
8
9
3
3
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
527
20
:
0
0
1
10
73
22
0
10
8
14
3
1
0
0
0
00430
21
:
0
0
0
6
4
6
1
5
8
1
0
3
1
9
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
335
22
:
0
0
0
3
2
3
7
7
6
0
1
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
181
23
:
0
0
3
5
15
29
30
11
1
0
0
0
0
0094
10
5
1
8
3
9
9
7
3
8
3
0
3
2
6
3
7
0
7
1
0
7
6
9198
1%
2
%
1
1
%
4
2
%
3
5
%
8
%
1
%
0
%
100%
31
6
4
3
1
1
1
1
7
7
1
1
5
0
2
8
9
5
7
1
0
0
0
003080
0%
1
%
3
%
1
3
%
1
3
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
33%
07
:
0
0
1
0
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
1
0
:
0
0
07:00
11
1
9
8
2
2
6
6
2
4
9
5
3
1
2
1
688
74
1
1
9
6
8
6
2
6
5
3
2
1
1
3
4
1
8
5
0
5
0
0
0
006118
1%
1
%
7
%
2
9
%
2
3
%
5
%
1
%
0
%
67%
15
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
17:00
26
2
4
8
1
2
9
7
2
9
0
5
8
8
1
732
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
12
0
7
13
%
1
2
1
5
13
%
1
4
0
5
15
%
5
3
7
1
58%
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Ri
v
e
s
A
v
e
s
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Su
mm
a
r
y
29
Av
e
r
a
g
e
29
15
t
h
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
25
ADT 9198
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Ri
v
e
s
A
v
e
85
t
h
34
95
t
h
38
50
t
h
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_006n
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
0
2
9
1
4
2
0
5
0
2
0
0
0
0
52
01
:
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
8
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
15
02
:
0
0
0
0
0
2
5
3
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
15
03
:
0
0
0
0
0
1
9
4
4
0
0
2
0
0
0
20
04
:
0
0
1
0
3
7
1
0
1
5
1
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
50
05
:
0
0
1
0
0
4
2
5
3
8
2
1
4
1
0
0
0
0
94
06
:
0
0
1
5
7
2
7
7
0
8
8
4
8
5
2
1
0
0
0
254
07
:
0
0
15
2
7
6
7
1
3
4
2
2
7
1
8
3
5
6
5
1
0
0
0
0
715
08
:
0
0
6
5
1
9
6
7
1
7
3
1
4
8
5
3
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
483
09
:
0
0
3
8
2
8
7
0
1
6
5
1
1
2
4
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
432
10
:
0
0
8
1
2
3
2
8
2
1
7
3
1
2
8
2
9
4
0
0
0
0
0
468
11
:
0
0
1
5
3
1
1
0
3
2
2
5
1
6
6
3
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
567
12
:
0
0
P
M
3
1
3
4
5
1
2
8
2
3
0
1
1
8
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
569
13
:
0
0
5
4
3
9
8
5
1
9
5
1
2
2
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
482
14
:
0
0
40
2
9
7
6
1
3
4
1
9
7
1
3
4
2
6
3
0
0
0
0
0
639
15
:
0
0
46
3
9
8
0
1
2
5
1
8
9
1
1
8
2
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
623
16
:
0
0
14
2
2
8
1
1
6
0
2
0
0
1
0
8
1
7
2
1
1
0
0
0
606
17
:
0
0
9
4
6
6
1
1
4
1
1
6
6
1
2
4
2
7
6
1
0
0
0
0
581
18
:
0
0
2
7
2
0
9
2
2
2
0
1
4
6
4
4
8
0
0
0
0
0
539
19
:
0
0
0
1
1
9
6
1
1
8
0
1
3
6
2
7
2
1
0
0
0
0
427
20
:
0
0
1
3
15
56
14
4
10
9
20
3
0
0
0
00351
21
:
0
0
0
0
6
4
0
8
7
7
6
2
1
2
2
1
0
0
0
235
22
:
0
0
0
0
1
3
7
6
9
3
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
144
23
:
0
0
0
0
0
5
20
21
9
3
4
1
0
0063
15
6
2
2
6
6
3
2
1
5
7
2
2
9
9
7
2
1
5
9
5
8
5
7
2
1
9
6
8424
2%
3
%
8
%
1
9
%
3
6
%
2
6
%
7
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
100%
36
6
2
1
8
9
5
0
8
1
1
0
0
9
1
3
3
0
6
3
8
1
0
3
0
003165
0%
1
%
2
%
6
%
1
3
%
1
1
%
4
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
38%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
0
4
:
0
0
0
3
:
0
0
07:00
15
2
7
6
7
1
3
4
2
2
7
1
8
3
5
6
1
2
3
2
715
12
0
1
6
4
4
4
3
1
0
6
4
1
8
9
7
1
2
4
6
2
7
9
3
4
9
3
0
005259
1%
2
%
5
%
1
3
%
2
3
%
1
5
%
3
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
62%
15
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
2
3
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
14:00
46
4
6
8
1
1
6
0
2
3
0
1
4
6
4
4
8
4
1
639
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
11
9
8
14
%
1
0
5
1
12
%
1
1
8
7
14
%
4
9
8
8
59%
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
So
u
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
%
P
M
%
A
M
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Do
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
s
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
SP
E
E
D
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Vo
l
u
m
e
Vo
l
u
m
e
15
t
h
26 27
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
To
t
a
l
s
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
95
t
h
42 42
50t
h
33 33
Av
e
r
a
g
e
32 33
ADT 8424 7954
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Do
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Do
w
ne
y
A
v
e
85
t
h
39 39
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_006s
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
1
3
8
2
7
1
5
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
62
01
:
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
5
1
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
34
02
:
0
0
0
2
0
2
1
0
8
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
24
03
:
0
0
0
0
1
1
5
3
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
13
04
:
0
0
0
2
3
4
1
0
1
3
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
38
05
:
0
0
0
1
6
6
1
7
1
3
5
4
0
0
0
0
0
52
06
:
0
0
0
4
1
4
1
4
4
7
7
4
1
9
2
0
0
0
0
0
174
07
:
0
0
4
2
2
9
1
1
1
2
8
9
2
2
5
5
6
2
1
0
0
0
0
719
08
:
0
0
3
8
2
4
3
0
1
2
7
1
1
6
3
4
4
2
0
0
0
0
348
09
:
0
0
5
5
2
1
6
9
1
2
5
1
1
8
3
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
378
10
:
0
0
5
5
2
6
5
8
1
4
8
9
4
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
358
11
:
0
0
2
7
2
6
6
7
1
4
8
1
2
9
2
8
4
0
0
0
0
0
411
12
:
0
0
P
M
2
1
1
2
8
8
2
1
7
9
1
5
2
3
2
6
1
0
0
0
0
493
13
:
0
0
1
7
2
7
6
9
2
3
2
1
5
5
4
5
6
0
0
0
0
0
542
14
:
0
0
1
3
4
0
1
3
6
2
7
0
1
7
1
4
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
665
15
:
0
0
2
7
3
2
9
1
2
8
1
1
9
2
4
9
4
0
0
0
0
0
658
16
:
0
0
3
2
2
3
9
8
2
2
1
1
9
0
3
5
4
0
0
0
0
0
576
17
:
0
0
1
7
1
5
6
5
2
1
0
1
7
8
3
7
6
1
1
0
0
0
521
18
:
0
0
2
9
3
2
8
8
2
0
8
1
3
3
2
5
7
0
0
0
0
0
504
19
:
0
0
2
7
3
7
9
0
1
3
4
1
2
1
2
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
415
20
:
0
0
2
17
58
12
3
15
1
78
16
1
0
0
0
00446
21
:
0
0
1
0
2
3
7
1
1
2
9
0
2
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
268
22
:
0
0
0
1
3
2
3
6
6
4
6
1
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
155
23
:
0
0
0
0
3
15
41
29
9
1
2
0
0
00100
36
1
0
8
4
5
4
1
2
8
9
3
0
7
3
2
3
5
5
5
5
5
7
5
7
2
7954
0%
1
%
6
%
1
6
%
3
9
%
3
0
%
7
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
100%
19
3
7
1
5
4
3
7
2
9
6
8
8
2
0
2
1
0
2
7
3
1
0
002611
0%
0
%
2
%
5
%
1
2
%
1
0
%
3
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
33%
09
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
5
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
0
3
:
0
0
07:00
5
8
2
9
1
1
1
2
8
9
2
2
5
5
6
4
2
1
719
17
7
1
3
0
0
9
1
7
2
1
0
5
1
5
3
5
3
4
5
4
8
4
1
0
005343
0%
1
%
4
%
1
2
%
2
6
%
1
9
%
4
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
67%
16
:
0
0
2
0
:
0
0
2
0
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
2
3
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
14:00
3
1
7
5
8
1
3
6
2
8
1
1
9
2
4
9
7
2
1
665
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
10
6
7
13
%
1
0
3
5
13
%
1
0
9
7
14
%
4
7
5
5
60%
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
So
u
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
ur
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
15
t
h
27
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
26
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Do
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
s
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
So
ut
h
B
o
u
n
d
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
95
t
h
42 42
50
t
h
33 33
Av
e
r
a
g
e
32 33
ADT 8424 7954
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Do
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
Do
w
ne
y
A
v
e
85
t
h
39 39
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_006
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
1
5
17
4
1
3
5
1
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
114
01
:
0
0
0
0
1
4
1
9
2
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
49
02
:
0
0
0
2
0
4
1
5
1
1
5
1
1
0
0
0
0
39
03
:
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
4
7
5
1
0
3
0
0
0
33
04
:
0
0
1
2
6
1
1
2
0
2
8
1
4
3
3
0
0
0
0
88
05
:
0
0
1
1
6
1
0
4
2
5
1
2
6
8
1
0
0
0
0
146
06
:
0
0
1
9
2
1
4
1
1
1
7
1
6
2
6
7
7
2
1
0
0
0
428
07
:
0
0
19
2
9
9
6
2
4
5
5
1
6
4
0
8
1
1
2
7
2
0
0
0
0
1434
08
:
0
0
9
1
3
4
3
9
7
3
0
0
2
6
4
8
7
1
6
2
0
0
0
0
831
09
:
0
0
8
1
3
4
9
1
3
9
2
9
0
2
3
0
7
5
6
0
0
0
0
0
810
10
:
0
0
13
1
7
5
8
1
4
0
3
2
1
2
2
2
4
9
6
0
0
0
0
0
826
11
:
0
0
3
1
2
5
7
1
7
0
3
7
3
2
9
5
6
1
7
0
0
0
0
0
978
12
:
0
0
P
M
5
2
4
7
3
2
1
0
4
0
9
2
7
0
6
2
8
1
0
0
0
0
1062
13
:
0
0
6
1
1
6
6
1
5
4
4
2
7
2
7
7
7
7
6
0
0
0
0
0
1024
14
:
0
0
41
3
2
1
1
6
2
7
0
4
6
7
3
0
5
6
8
5
0
0
0
0
0
1304
15
:
0
0
48
4
6
1
1
2
2
1
6
4
7
0
3
1
0
7
2
7
0
0
0
0
0
1281
16
:
0
0
17
2
4
1
0
4
2
5
8
4
2
1
2
9
8
5
2
6
1
1
0
0
0
1182
17
:
0
0
10
5
3
7
6
2
0
6
3
7
6
3
0
2
6
4
1
2
2
1
0
0
0
1102
18
:
0
0
4
1
6
5
2
1
8
0
4
2
8
2
7
9
6
9
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
1043
19
:
0
0
2
8
5
6
1
5
1
3
1
4
2
5
7
4
7
6
1
0
0
0
0
842
20
:
0
0
3
20
73
17
9
29
5
18
7
36
4
0
0
0
00797
21
:
0
0
1
0
8
7
7
1
9
9
1
6
6
4
4
5
2
1
0
0
0
503
22
:
0
0
0
1
4
6
0
1
3
5
8
0
1
5
4
0
0
0
0
0
299
23
:
0
0
0
0
3
20
61
50
18
4
6
1
0
00163
19
2
3
3
4
1
0
8
6
2
8
6
1
6
0
7
0
4
5
1
4
1
1
4
0
1
4
7
2
6
8
16378
1%
2
%
7
%
1
7
%
3
7
%
2
8
%
7
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
100%
55
9
9
3
4
3
8
8
0
2
0
6
8
1
7
3
3
5
1
6
6
5
1
3
4
0
005776
0%
1
%
2
%
5
%
1
3
%
1
1
%
3
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
35%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
0
4
:
0
0
0
3
:
0
0
07:00
19
2
9
9
6
2
4
5
5
1
6
4
0
8
1
1
2
1
6
3
3
1434
13
7
2
3
5
7
4
3
1
9
8
1
4
0
0
2
2
7
8
1
6
2
4
8
2
1
3
4
0
0010602
1%
1
%
5
%
1
2
%
2
4
%
1
7
%
4
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
65%
15
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
2
3
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
14:00
48
5
3
1
1
6
2
7
0
4
7
0
3
1
0
7
7
1
5
6
1
1304
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
22
6
5
14
%
2
0
8
6
13
%
2
2
8
4
14
%
9
7
4
3
59%
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Do
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
s
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Su
mm
a
r
y
33
Av
e
r
a
g
e
33
15
t
h
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
26
ADT 16378
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Do
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
85
t
h
39
95
t
h
42
50
t
h
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_007n
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
1
5
6
8
5
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
29
01
:
0
0
0
0
1
2
4
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
02
:
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
9
03
:
0
0
0
1
3
3
4
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
04
:
0
0
0
1
4
7
6
9
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
34
05
:
0
0
1
3
9
1
2
1
5
1
6
1
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
73
06
:
0
0
5
8
2
7
3
5
4
2
6
0
2
8
8
3
1
0
0
0
217
07
:
0
0
44
4
5
1
0
9
1
6
6
1
8
2
1
7
6
7
6
1
9
6
0
0
0
0
823
08
:
0
0
9
1
7
5
6
1
0
1
1
2
6
1
1
3
5
5
1
5
6
0
0
0
0
498
09
:
0
0
8
2
1
5
9
1
0
1
1
0
8
9
2
3
9
8
1
0
0
0
0
437
10
:
0
0
7
1
8
4
5
9
1
8
8
8
0
3
5
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
377
11
:
0
0
13
2
9
6
9
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
0
5
5
1
5
2
0
0
0
0
526
12
:
0
0
P
M
10
2
4
7
4
1
0
5
1
0
2
9
8
5
0
9
3
1
0
0
0
476
13
:
0
0
13
2
9
7
1
1
0
9
1
1
9
1
0
1
4
9
1
5
2
0
0
0
0
508
14
:
0
0
38
5
5
1
0
6
1
4
5
1
6
4
1
4
7
6
7
1
4
3
0
0
0
0
739
15
:
0
0
37
4
3
9
6
1
3
5
1
2
3
1
3
3
5
7
1
4
2
1
0
0
0
641
16
:
0
0
16
3
5
9
2
1
2
1
1
3
8
1
3
6
6
4
2
1
5
0
0
0
0
628
17
:
0
0
15
2
8
7
9
1
1
9
1
2
4
1
4
4
6
4
1
8
4
1
0
0
0
596
18
:
0
0
9
2
2
6
6
1
1
2
1
0
4
1
3
1
6
1
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
520
19
:
0
0
6
1
2
4
4
6
1
6
9
1
0
0
4
9
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
354
20
:
0
0
1
8
35
47
68
69
31
4
1
0
0
00264
21
:
0
0
0
4
1
9
3
0
5
3
4
7
1
9
8
2
0
0
0
0
182
22
:
0
0
0
3
1
3
2
1
2
6
2
7
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
104
23
:
0
0
0
1
6
8
11
11
5
1
0
0
0
0043
23
2
4
0
8
1
0
8
9
1
6
5
0
1
7
9
8
1
8
2
3
8
4
3
2
1
1
4
7
4
8105
3%
5
%
1
3
%
2
0
%
2
2
%
2
2
%
1
0
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
100%
87
1
4
4
3
8
8
6
3
7
6
9
7
6
7
9
3
1
5
8
1
2
1
1
0
003050
1%
2
%
5
%
8
%
9
%
8
%
4
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
38%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
07:00
44
4
5
1
0
9
1
6
6
1
8
2
1
7
6
7
6
1
9
6
1
823
14
5
2
6
4
7
0
1
1
0
1
3
1
1
0
1
1
1
4
4
5
2
8
1
3
0
2
6
3
0
005055
2%
3
%
9
%
1
2
%
1
4
%
1
4
%
7
%
2
%
0
%
0
%
62%
14
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
14:00
38
5
5
1
0
6
1
4
5
1
6
4
1
4
7
6
7
2
1
5
1
739
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
13
2
1
16
%
9
8
4
12
%
1
2
2
4
15
%
4
5
7
6
56%
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
So
u
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
ADT 8105 7223
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Br
o
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
Br
o
ok
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
85
t
h
40 40
95
t
h
44 45
50
t
h
32 33
Av
e
r
a
g
e
31 33
15
t
h
23 26
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
To
t
a
l
s
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
SP
E
E
D
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Vo
l
u
m
e
Vo
l
u
m
e
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
%
P
M
%
A
M
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Br
o
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
s
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_007s
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
0
3
7
7
1
1
7
2
0
1
0
0
0
38
01
:
0
0
0
0
1
4
4
6
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
19
02
:
0
0
0
0
1
3
5
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
03
:
0
0
0
1
1
3
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
04
:
0
0
0
0
2
3
8
5
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
22
05
:
0
0
1
0
4
1
1
1
4
1
3
9
3
2
0
0
0
0
57
06
:
0
0
0
2
1
3
3
4
3
6
3
6
1
5
6
1
0
0
0
0
143
07
:
0
0
1
6
6
1
1
3
1
1
5
3
1
2
1
7
2
2
6
2
1
0
0
0
574
08
:
0
0
2
7
3
7
7
3
9
0
7
4
3
7
1
5
4
0
0
0
0
339
09
:
0
0
3
8
4
3
8
0
8
9
7
4
3
9
8
2
0
0
0
0
346
10
:
0
0
1
9
6
3
8
9
1
0
1
7
1
3
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
378
11
:
0
0
1
9
6
4
9
8
1
1
9
1
1
1
5
0
1
4
2
0
0
0
0
468
12
:
0
0
P
M
3
1
0
5
4
1
1
3
1
2
2
8
8
4
9
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
454
13
:
0
0
1
7
5
3
9
0
1
3
3
1
0
7
5
5
1
7
2
0
0
0
0
465
14
:
0
0
1
1
0
6
2
1
2
4
1
8
1
1
2
2
6
3
1
6
2
0
0
0
0
581
15
:
0
0
2
6
5
5
1
4
8
1
8
0
1
2
9
6
1
1
6
2
0
0
0
0
599
16
:
0
0
1
6
4
9
1
2
1
1
7
0
1
2
3
6
6
1
5
3
0
0
0
0
554
17
:
0
0
2
4
4
6
1
1
5
1
6
1
1
3
0
6
2
1
7
2
0
0
0
0
539
18
:
0
0
2
4
3
5
8
9
1
2
2
1
1
7
5
7
2
2
3
0
0
0
0
451
19
:
0
0
2
5
2
6
6
2
1
0
1
1
1
3
4
9
1
7
1
1
0
0
0
377
20
:
0
0
1
3
22
62
97
10
9
42
11
3
1
0
00351
21
:
0
0
1
2
1
7
4
3
6
0
7
0
4
2
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
249
22
:
0
0
0
2
9
2
1
3
6
3
1
2
2
5
3
0
0
0
0
129
23
:
0
0
0
1
5
11
16
14
11
4
0
0
0
0062
25
1
0
2
7
2
6
1
5
3
5
2
0
0
8
1
6
8
1
8
4
9
2
5
2
4
0
5
7223
0%
1
%
1
0
%
2
1
%
2
8
%
2
3
%
1
2
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
100%
9
4
2
2
9
3
5
3
6
6
2
9
5
2
8
2
7
0
8
7
1
5
3
0
002412
0%
1
%
4
%
7
%
9
%
7
%
4
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
33%
09
:
0
0
1
0
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
07:00
3
9
6
4
1
3
1
1
5
3
1
2
1
7
2
2
6
4
1
574
16
6
0
4
3
3
9
9
9
1
3
7
9
1
1
5
3
5
7
9
1
6
5
2
5
2
0
004811
0%
1
%
6
%
1
4
%
1
9
%
1
6
%
8
%
2
%
0
%
0
%
67%
12
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
9
:
0
0
15:00
3
1
0
6
2
1
4
8
1
8
1
1
3
0
6
6
2
2
3
1
599
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
91
3
13
%
9
1
9
13
%
1
0
9
3
15
%
4
2
9
8
60%
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
So
u
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
ADT 8105 7223
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Br
o
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
Br
o
ok
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
85
t
h
40 40
95
t
h
44 45
50
t
h
32 33
Av
e
r
a
g
e
31 33
15
t
h
26
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
23
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Br
o
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
s
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
So
ut
h
B
o
u
n
d
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_007
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
1
8
13
1
5
1
6
1
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
67
01
:
0
0
0
0
2
6
8
9
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
30
02
:
0
0
0
0
2
5
7
6
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
26
03
:
0
0
0
2
4
6
7
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
04
:
0
0
0
1
6
1
0
1
4
1
4
9
2
0
0
0
0
0
56
05
:
0
0
2
3
1
3
2
3
2
9
2
9
2
3
5
3
0
0
0
0
130
06
:
0
0
5
1
0
4
0
6
9
7
8
9
6
4
3
1
4
4
1
0
0
0
360
07
:
0
0
45
5
1
1
7
0
2
9
7
3
3
5
2
9
7
1
4
8
4
5
8
1
0
0
0
1397
08
:
0
0
11
2
4
9
3
1
7
4
2
1
6
1
8
7
9
2
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
837
09
:
0
0
11
2
9
1
0
2
1
8
1
1
9
7
1
6
6
7
8
1
6
3
0
0
0
0
783
10
:
0
0
8
2
7
1
0
8
1
8
0
1
8
9
1
5
1
6
5
2
3
3
1
0
0
0
755
11
:
0
0
14
3
8
1
3
3
2
0
9
2
3
1
2
3
1
1
0
5
2
9
4
0
0
0
0
994
12
:
0
0
P
M
13
3
4
1
2
8
2
1
8
2
2
4
1
8
6
9
9
2
2
5
1
0
0
0
930
13
:
0
0
14
3
6
1
2
4
1
9
9
2
5
2
2
0
8
1
0
4
3
2
4
0
0
0
0
973
14
:
0
0
39
6
5
1
6
8
2
6
9
3
4
5
2
6
9
1
3
0
3
0
5
0
0
0
0
1320
15
:
0
0
39
4
9
1
5
1
2
8
3
3
0
3
2
6
2
1
1
8
3
0
4
1
0
0
0
1240
16
:
0
0
17
4
1
1
4
1
2
4
2
3
0
8
2
5
9
1
3
0
3
6
8
0
0
0
0
1182
17
:
0
0
17
3
2
1
2
5
2
3
4
2
8
5
2
7
4
1
2
6
3
5
6
1
0
0
0
1135
18
:
0
0
11
2
6
1
0
1
2
0
1
2
2
6
2
4
8
1
1
8
3
5
5
0
0
0
0
971
19
:
0
0
8
1
7
7
0
1
2
3
1
7
0
2
1
3
9
8
2
8
3
1
0
0
0
731
20
:
0
0
2
11
57
10
9
16
5
17
8
73
15
4
1
0
00615
21
:
0
0
1
6
3
6
7
3
1
1
3
1
1
7
6
1
2
0
4
0
0
0
0
431
22
:
0
0
0
5
2
2
4
2
6
2
5
8
3
4
7
3
0
0
0
0
233
23
:
0
0
0
2
11
19
27
25
16
5
0
0
0
00105
25
7
5
1
0
1
8
1
5
3
1
8
5
3
8
0
6
3
5
0
4
1
6
9
2
4
6
3
8
7
9
15328
2%
3
%
1
2
%
2
1
%
2
5
%
2
3
%
1
1
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
100%
96
1
8
6
6
8
1
1
1
7
3
1
3
2
6
1
2
0
7
5
8
5
1
6
8
3
6
4
0
005462
1%
1
%
4
%
8
%
9
%
8
%
4
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
36%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
07:00
45
5
1
1
7
0
2
9
7
3
3
5
2
9
7
1
4
8
4
5
1
0
1
1397
16
1
3
2
4
1
1
3
4
2
0
1
2
2
4
8
0
2
2
9
7
1
1
0
7
2
9
5
5
1
5
0
009866
1%
2
%
7
%
1
3
%
1
6
%
1
5
%
7
%
2
%
0
%
0
%
64%
14
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
14:00
39
6
5
1
6
8
2
8
3
3
4
5
2
7
4
1
3
0
3
6
8
1
1320
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
22
3
4
15
%
1
9
0
3
12
%
2
3
1
7
15
%
8
8
7
4
58%
Su
m
m
a
r
y
ADT 15328
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Do
w
n
e
y
A
v
e
85
t
h
40
95
t
h
44
50
t
h
32
Av
e
r
a
g
e
32
15
t
h
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
24
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Br
o
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
s
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Su
mm
a
r
y
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_008n
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
5
4
8
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
01
:
0
0
0
2
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
02
:
0
0
0
5
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
03
:
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
04
:
0
0
3
6
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
05
:
0
0
6
9
1
0
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
38
06
:
0
0
3
1
2
1
0
7
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
37
07
:
0
0
26
6
5
4
8
1
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
155
08
:
0
0
9
3
2
3
4
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
89
09
:
0
0
15
3
0
3
3
6
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
88
10
:
0
0
13
5
1
3
5
1
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
117
11
:
0
0
10
4
5
6
6
1
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
138
12
:
0
0
P
M
13
4
8
5
2
2
2
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
143
13
:
0
0
33
5
2
4
5
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
138
14
:
0
0
16
5
2
4
8
1
5
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
133
15
:
0
0
21
5
0
5
5
2
9
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
157
16
:
0
0
27
6
2
7
1
2
9
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
196
17
:
0
0
26
6
6
7
8
2
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
198
18
:
0
0
31
4
7
4
9
2
2
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
154
19
:
0
0
23
4
3
3
1
1
9
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
118
20
:
0
0
18
42
37
10
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
00109
21
:
0
0
8
2
9
2
4
1
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
79
22
:
0
0
8
3
0
1
2
7
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
59
23
:
0
0
4
14
22
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0049
31
8
7
9
6
7
7
9
2
9
9
4
8
1
3
2253
14
%
3
5
%
3
5
%
1
3
%
2
%
1
%
100%
90
2
6
1
2
5
5
8
9
1
8
7
0
0
0
0
0
00720
4%
1
2
%
1
1
%
4
%
1
%
0
%
32%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
1
0
:
0
0
0
9
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
07:00
26
6
5
6
6
1
7
4
3
155
22
8
5
3
5
5
2
4
2
1
0
3
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
001533
10
%
2
4
%
2
3
%
9
%
1
%
0
%
68%
13
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
17:00
33
6
6
7
8
2
9
7
3
198
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
24
4
11
%
2
8
1
12
%
3
9
4
17
%
1
3
3
4
59%
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
So
u
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
%
P
M
%
A
M
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Pa
t
t
o
n
R
d
s
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
SP
E
E
D
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Vo
l
u
m
e
Vo
l
u
m
e
15
t
h
15 14
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
To
t
a
l
s
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
95
t
h
29 30
50t
h
20 21
Av
e
r
a
g
e
20 21
ADT 2253 2359
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Pa
t
t
o
n
R
d
Pa
t
to
n
R
d
85
t
h
25 27
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_008s
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
3
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
01
:
0
0
0
2
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
02
:
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
03
:
0
0
0
1
3
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
04
:
0
0
2
4
1
5
9
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
05
:
0
0
1
6
1
5
1
8
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
44
06
:
0
0
7
2
9
4
3
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
122
07
:
0
0
22
1
7
5
8
4
2
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
145
08
:
0
0
12
3
2
4
4
2
4
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
119
09
:
0
0
15
1
2
4
3
2
1
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
97
10
:
0
0
28
1
6
4
1
2
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
112
11
:
0
0
21
2
2
3
1
2
9
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
107
12
:
0
0
P
M
21
3
6
4
9
3
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
139
13
:
0
0
36
4
5
5
1
3
2
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
168
14
:
0
0
29
4
5
6
3
2
5
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
169
15
:
0
0
24
2
4
4
3
3
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
124
16
:
0
0
21
3
1
4
7
2
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
128
17
:
0
0
27
4
0
5
9
2
9
7
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
164
18
:
0
0
36
4
5
6
6
2
6
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
180
19
:
0
0
32
3
5
3
9
1
6
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
125
20
:
0
0
30
42
50
18
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
00143
21
:
0
0
20
3
2
3
8
1
6
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
111
22
:
0
0
12
2
1
1
2
1
8
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
68
23
:
0
0
6
8
7
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0030
40
5
5
4
8
8
2
4
4
8
8
8
4
6
4
2359
17
%
2
3
%
3
5
%
2
1
%
4
%
0
%
0
%
100%
11
1
1
4
4
3
0
0
2
1
0
4
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
00810
5%
6
%
1
3
%
9
%
2
%
0
%
0
%
34%
10
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
0
2
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
07:00
28
3
2
5
8
4
2
1
0
1
1
145
29
4
4
0
4
5
2
4
2
7
8
4
2
4
3
0
0
0
0
001549
12
%
1
7
%
2
2
%
1
2
%
2
%
0
%
0
%
66%
13
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
18:00
36
4
5
6
6
3
2
7
2
1
180
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
26
4
11
%
3
0
7
13
%
2
9
2
12
%
1
4
9
6
63%
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
So
u
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
ur
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
15
t
h
14
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
15
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Pa
t
t
o
n
R
d
s
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
So
ut
h
B
o
u
n
d
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
95
t
h
29 30
50
t
h
20 21
Av
e
r
a
g
e
20 21
ADT 2253 2359
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Pa
t
t
o
n
R
d
Pa
t
to
n
R
d
85
t
h
25 27
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_008
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
8
6
1
2
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
32
01
:
0
0
0
4
4
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
02
:
0
0
0
6
3
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
03
:
0
0
0
1
5
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
04
:
0
0
5
1
0
2
0
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
05
:
0
0
7
1
5
2
5
2
8
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
82
06
:
0
0
10
4
1
5
3
4
0
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
159
07
:
0
0
48
8
2
1
0
6
5
3
9
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300
08
:
0
0
21
6
4
7
8
3
7
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
208
09
:
0
0
30
4
2
7
6
2
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
185
10
:
0
0
41
6
7
7
6
4
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
229
11
:
0
0
31
6
7
9
7
4
5
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
245
12
:
0
0
P
M
34
8
4
1
0
1
5
3
7
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
282
13
:
0
0
69
9
7
9
6
4
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
306
14
:
0
0
45
9
7
1
1
1
4
0
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
302
15
:
0
0
45
7
4
9
8
6
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
281
16
:
0
0
48
9
3
1
1
8
5
7
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
324
17
:
0
0
53
1
0
6
1
3
7
5
5
9
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
362
18
:
0
0
67
9
2
1
1
5
4
8
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
334
19
:
0
0
55
7
8
7
0
3
5
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
243
20
:
0
0
48
84
87
28
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
00252
21
:
0
0
28
6
1
6
2
3
1
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
190
22
:
0
0
20
5
1
2
4
2
5
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
127
23
:
0
0
10
22
29
16
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0079
72
3
1
3
4
4
1
6
0
3
7
8
7
1
3
2
1
9
4
4612
16
%
2
9
%
3
5
%
1
7
%
3
%
0
%
0
%
100%
20
1
4
0
5
5
5
5
2
9
9
6
0
9
1
0
0
0
0
001530
4%
9
%
1
2
%
6
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
33%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
07:00
48
8
2
1
0
6
5
3
1
2
3
1
300
52
2
9
3
9
1
0
4
8
4
8
8
7
2
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
003082
11
%
2
0
%
2
3
%
1
1
%
2
%
0
%
0
%
67%
13
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
17:00
69
1
0
6
1
3
7
6
0
1
2
3
1
362
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
50
8
11
%
5
8
8
13
%
6
8
6
15
%
2
8
3
0
61%
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Pa
t
t
o
n
R
d
s
/
o
F
i
r
e
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Su
mm
a
r
y
21
Av
e
r
a
g
e
20
15
t
h
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
15
ADT 4612
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Pa
t
t
o
n
R
d
85
t
h
27
95
t
h
30
50
t
h
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_009e
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
0
0
7
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
01
:
0
0
0
0
2
6
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
02
:
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
03
:
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
04
:
0
0
0
0
2
2
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
05
:
0
0
0
1
5
1
2
9
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
06
:
0
0
1
3
1
3
3
6
1
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
69
07
:
0
0
7
1
7
7
6
2
1
9
9
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
416
08
:
0
0
3
8
3
6
1
0
4
4
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
197
09
:
0
0
3
9
3
7
1
0
8
4
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
205
10
:
0
0
4
9
4
2
1
2
3
5
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
232
11
:
0
0
5
1
3
6
4
1
7
9
7
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
341
12
:
0
0
P
M
4
3
6
5
1
9
1
6
5
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
335
13
:
0
0
0
1
2
6
5
2
0
5
7
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
356
14
:
0
0
28
5
1
1
1
6
1
9
3
6
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
454
15
:
0
0
13
1
8
1
0
0
2
4
2
9
6
1
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
485
16
:
0
0
1
7
4
6
2
2
7
1
1
7
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
402
17
:
0
0
1
5
6
7
2
2
6
1
0
9
9
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
418
18
:
0
0
5
1
9
5
6
2
0
1
6
8
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
355
19
:
0
0
4
5
4
2
1
2
4
5
9
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
236
20
:
0
0
0
7
30
12
3
39
4
0
0
0
0
0
00203
21
:
0
0
4
6
2
4
6
7
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
135
22
:
0
0
0
4
1
3
3
3
1
7
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
70
23
:
0
0
0
0
9
15
12
1
0
0
0
0
0
0037
83
1
9
8
9
1
2
2
6
4
7
1
0
8
7
8
6
4
5017
2%
4
%
1
8
%
5
3
%
2
2
%
2
%
0
%
100%
23
6
1
2
7
9
8
0
0
3
4
0
2
7
1
0
0
0
0
001531
0%
1
%
6
%
1
6
%
7
%
1
%
0
%
31%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
1
:
0
0
07:00
7
1
7
7
6
2
1
9
9
0
7
1
416
60
1
3
7
6
3
3
1
8
4
7
7
4
7
5
9
3
0
0
0
0
003486
1%
3
%
1
3
%
3
7
%
1
5
%
1
%
0
%
69%
14
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
15:00
28
5
1
1
1
6
2
4
2
1
1
7
1
5
1
485
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
61
3
12
%
6
9
1
14
%
8
2
0
16
%
2
8
9
3
58%
Ea
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
We
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
%
P
M
%
A
M
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
5t
h
S
t
w
/
o
L
a
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
SP
E
E
D
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Ea
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Vo
l
u
m
e
Vo
l
u
m
e
15
t
h
23 21
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
To
t
a
l
s
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
95
t
h
34 34
50t
h
27 26
Av
e
r
a
g
e
27 26
ADT 5017 4232
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
5t
h
S
t
5t
h
S
t
85
t
h
32 30
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_009w
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
1
7
10
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
01
:
0
0
0
0
2
6
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
02
:
0
0
0
1
3
3
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
03
:
0
0
0
0
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
04
:
0
0
0
0
2
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
05
:
0
0
0
1
2
4
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
06
:
0
0
1
3
9
3
4
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
62
07
:
0
0
11
4
6
1
4
8
1
2
5
1
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
346
08
:
0
0
3
4
3
4
1
0
5
4
5
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
198
09
:
0
0
0
3
3
9
8
2
4
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
170
10
:
0
0
2
4
6
1
7
7
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
178
11
:
0
0
0
9
5
6
1
0
9
3
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
212
12
:
0
0
P
M
0
7
7
0
1
2
7
3
8
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
245
13
:
0
0
2
1
1
9
7
1
2
2
4
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
280
14
:
0
0
7
4
8
1
5
7
1
6
5
3
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
414
15
:
0
0
3
1
7
1
2
2
1
9
5
4
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
384
16
:
0
0
2
1
0
7
2
1
5
5
3
9
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
285
17
:
0
0
4
1
1
8
1
1
6
5
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
294
18
:
0
0
4
2
6
9
4
1
1
6
4
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
286
19
:
0
0
4
2
2
7
7
1
1
9
2
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
250
20
:
0
0
1
14
90
11
9
20
0
0
1
0
0
0
00245
21
:
0
0
8
1
3
8
6
5
7
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
178
22
:
0
0
2
4
2
9
3
7
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
85
23
:
0
0
0
0
11
20
11
2
1
0
0
0
0
0045
54
2
5
5
1
3
5
3
1
9
5
6
5
6
5
4
4
4
1
4232
1%
6
%
3
2
%
4
6
%
1
3
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
100%
17
7
2
3
6
7
5
5
9
2
0
2
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
001241
0%
2
%
9
%
1
3
%
5
%
1
%
0
%
29%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
0
2
:
0
0
07:00
11
4
6
1
4
8
1
2
5
4
5
7
1
346
37
1
8
3
9
8
6
1
3
9
7
3
6
3
2
1
3
1
0
0
0
002991
1%
4
%
2
3
%
3
3
%
9
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
71%
21
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
2
0
:
0
0
14:00
8
4
8
1
5
7
1
9
5
4
6
5
2
1
414
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
54
4
13
%
5
2
5
12
%
5
7
9
14
%
2
5
8
4
61%
Ea
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
We
s
t
B
o
u
n
d
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
15
t
h
21
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
23
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
5t
h
S
t
w
/
o
L
a
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
We
st
B
o
u
n
d
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
95
t
h
34 34
50
t
h
27 26
Av
e
r
a
g
e
27 26
ADT 5017 4232
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
5t
h
S
t
5t
h
S
t
85
t
h
32 30
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_009
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
1
7
17
7
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35
01
:
0
0
0
0
4
1
2
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
02
:
0
0
0
2
4
5
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
03
:
0
0
0
0
5
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
04
:
0
0
0
0
4
5
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
05
:
0
0
0
2
7
1
6
1
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
42
06
:
0
0
2
6
2
2
7
0
2
8
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
131
07
:
0
0
18
6
3
2
2
4
3
4
4
1
0
6
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
762
08
:
0
0
6
1
2
7
0
2
0
9
8
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
395
09
:
0
0
3
1
2
7
6
1
9
0
8
6
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
375
10
:
0
0
6
1
3
1
0
3
2
0
0
8
3
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
410
11
:
0
0
5
2
2
1
2
0
2
8
8
1
0
9
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
553
12
:
0
0
P
M
4
1
0
1
3
5
3
1
8
1
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
580
13
:
0
0
2
2
3
1
6
2
3
2
7
1
1
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
636
14
:
0
0
35
9
9
2
7
3
3
5
8
9
7
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
868
15
:
0
0
16
3
5
2
2
2
4
3
7
1
4
0
1
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
869
16
:
0
0
3
1
7
1
1
8
3
8
2
1
5
6
9
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
687
17
:
0
0
5
1
6
1
4
8
3
9
1
1
4
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
712
18
:
0
0
9
4
5
1
5
0
3
1
7
1
1
4
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
641
19
:
0
0
8
2
7
1
1
9
2
4
3
8
6
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
486
20
:
0
0
1
21
12
0
24
2
59
4
0
1
0
0
0
00448
21
:
0
0
12
1
9
1
1
0
1
2
4
4
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
313
22
:
0
0
2
8
4
2
7
0
3
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
155
23
:
0
0
0
0
20
35
23
3
1
0
0
0
0
0082
13
7
4
5
3
2
2
6
5
4
6
0
3
1
6
5
2
1
3
0
8
1
9249
1%
5
%
2
4
%
5
0
%
1
8
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
100%
40
1
3
3
6
4
6
1
3
5
9
5
4
2
5
0
2
0
0
0
0
002772
0%
1
%
7
%
1
5
%
6
%
1
%
0
%
30%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
0
1
:
0
0
07:00
18
6
3
2
2
4
3
4
4
1
0
9
1
0
1
762
97
3
2
0
1
6
1
9
3
2
4
4
1
1
1
0
8
0
6
1
0
0
0
006477
1%
3
%
1
8
%
3
5
%
1
2
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
70%
14
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
2
0
:
0
0
15:00
35
9
9
2
7
3
4
3
7
1
5
6
1
8
2
1
869
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
11
5
7
13
%
1
2
1
6
13
%
1
3
9
9
15
%
5
4
7
7
59%
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
5t
h
S
t
w
/
o
L
a
k
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Su
mm
a
r
y
27
Av
e
r
a
g
e
27
15
t
h
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
22
ADT 9249
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
5t
h
S
t
85
t
h
31
95
t
h
34
50
t
h
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_010n
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
0
0
8
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
01
:
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
02
:
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
03
:
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
04
:
0
0
1
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
05
:
0
0
0
3
3
3
4
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
19
06
:
0
0
0
4
5
1
0
1
3
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
41
07
:
0
0
63
3
7
2
3
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
134
08
:
0
0
34
3
8
2
7
6
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
109
09
:
0
0
8
2
1
2
1
7
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
65
10
:
0
0
11
1
3
3
6
2
8
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
99
11
:
0
0
18
3
1
3
3
2
4
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
113
12
:
0
0
P
M
3
1
7
3
2
4
3
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
119
13
:
0
0
9
1
0
4
2
3
2
1
7
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
116
14
:
0
0
59
1
9
2
1
7
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
108
15
:
0
0
1
1
9
4
1
6
2
3
0
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
162
16
:
0
0
0
1
1
2
7
6
3
3
9
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
146
17
:
0
0
9
2
7
4
8
3
4
3
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
153
18
:
0
0
1
1
1
3
1
5
5
2
6
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
131
19
:
0
0
1
5
1
4
5
4
2
7
9
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
112
20
:
0
0
0
0
12
39
26
6
0
0
0
0
0
0083
21
:
0
0
0
2
1
6
3
1
1
9
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
74
22
:
0
0
0
1
5
2
4
1
1
3
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
46
23
:
0
0
0
1
4
10
9
6
1
0
0
0
0
0031
21
9
2
7
1
4
4
7
5
5
4
3
1
0
7
9
1
4
2
2
1898
12
%
1
4
%
2
4
%
2
9
%
1
6
%
4
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
100%
13
6
1
4
8
1
5
4
1
0
0
5
2
2
0
5
1
1
0
0
00617
7%
8
%
8
%
5
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
33%
07
:
0
0
0
8
:
0
0
1
0
:
0
0
1
0
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
0
5
:
0
0
0
5
:
0
0
07:00
63
3
8
3
6
2
8
1
3
8
1
1
1
134
83
1
2
3
2
9
3
4
5
4
2
5
8
5
9
9
1
1
0
0
001281
4%
6
%
1
5
%
2
4
%
1
4
%
3
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
67%
14
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
9
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
2
2
:
0
0
15:00
59
2
7
4
8
6
3
3
9
9
2
1
1
162
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
24
3
13
%
2
3
5
12
%
2
9
9
16
%
1
1
2
1
59%
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
So
u
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
ADT 1898 1674
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Tw
e
e
d
y
L
n
Tw
e
ed
y
L
n
85
t
h
32 31
95
t
h
35 35
50
t
h
25 24
Av
e
r
a
g
e
24 23
15
t
h
16 15
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
To
t
a
l
s
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
SP
E
E
D
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Vo
l
u
m
e
Vo
l
u
m
e
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
%
P
M
%
A
M
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Tw
e
e
d
y
L
n
s
/
o
S
u
v
a
S
t
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_010s
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
0
1
3
5
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
01
:
0
0
0
1
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
02
:
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
03
:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
04
:
0
0
0
1
4
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
05
:
0
0
0
0
2
4
5
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
06
:
0
0
6
1
1
2
1
3
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
45
07
:
0
0
57
4
4
3
8
1
7
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
158
08
:
0
0
32
2
2
1
7
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
79
09
:
0
0
17
3
2
3
3
1
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
98
10
:
0
0
11
3
5
3
5
2
5
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
112
11
:
0
0
20
2
3
3
5
2
9
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
115
12
:
0
0
P
M
5
5
3
0
3
4
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
87
13
:
0
0
15
2
1
2
5
2
3
9
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
14
:
0
0
51
2
9
1
3
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
15
:
0
0
7
1
0
3
6
4
2
1
5
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
115
16
:
0
0
4
4
1
8
6
1
3
6
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
133
17
:
0
0
17
3
6
4
4
4
0
1
6
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
158
18
:
0
0
5
6
3
0
3
1
2
7
7
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
108
19
:
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
5
2
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
73
20
:
0
0
1
1
16
20
13
7
0
0
0
0
0
0058
21
:
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
0
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
47
22
:
0
0
2
0
7
1
1
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
34
23
:
0
0
0
0
4
6
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0016
25
0
2
7
3
4
2
2
4
3
8
2
2
5
5
3
1
0
2
1
1674
15
%
1
6
%
2
5
%
2
6
%
1
3
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
100%
14
3
1
6
0
1
7
7
1
1
0
4
8
6
4
2
1
0
0
00651
9%
1
0
%
1
1
%
7
%
3
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
39%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
0
5
:
0
0
0
3
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
07:00
57
4
4
3
8
2
9
1
0
3
2
1
1
158
10
7
1
1
3
2
4
5
3
2
8
1
7
7
4
7
6
0
0
0
0
001023
6%
7
%
1
5
%
2
0
%
1
1
%
3
%
0
%
61%
14
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
17:00
51
3
6
4
4
6
1
3
6
8
2
158
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
23
7
14
%
1
8
1
11
%
2
9
1
17
%
9
6
5
58%
No
r
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
So
u
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
ADT 1898 1674
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Tw
e
e
d
y
L
n
Tw
e
ed
y
L
n
85
t
h
32 31
95
t
h
35 35
50
t
h
25 24
Av
e
r
a
g
e
24 23
15
t
h
15
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
16
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Tw
e
e
d
y
L
n
s
/
o
S
u
v
a
S
t
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
So
ut
h
B
o
u
n
d
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
Da
y
:
City:Downey
Da
t
e
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
CA14_5397_010
Ti
m
e
<
1
5
1
5
-
1
9
2
0
-
2
4
2
5
-
2
9
3
0
-
3
4
3
5
-
3
9
4
0
-
4
4
4
5
- 4
9
5
0
-
5
4
5
5
-
5
9
6
0
-
6
4
6
5
-
6
9
7
0
+
T
o
t
a
l
00
:
0
0
A
M
0
0
1
11
8
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
01
:
0
0
0
1
2
4
5
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
02
:
0
0
0
1
2
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
03
:
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
04
:
0
0
1
1
6
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
05
:
0
0
0
3
5
7
9
6
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
34
06
:
0
0
6
5
1
7
2
3
2
3
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
86
07
:
0
0
12
0
8
1
6
1
2
7
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
292
08
:
0
0
66
6
0
4
4
1
0
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
188
09
:
0
0
25
5
3
5
4
1
7
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
163
10
:
0
0
22
4
8
7
1
5
3
1
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
211
11
:
0
0
38
5
4
6
8
5
3
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
228
12
:
0
0
P
M
8
2
2
6
2
7
7
3
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
206
13
:
0
0
24
3
1
6
7
5
5
2
6
5
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
210
14
:
0
0
11
0
4
8
3
4
1
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
208
15
:
0
0
8
2
9
7
7
1
0
4
4
5
1
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
277
16
:
0
0
4
1
5
4
5
1
2
4
7
5
1
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
279
17
:
0
0
26
6
3
9
2
7
4
4
7
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
311
18
:
0
0
6
1
7
6
1
8
6
5
3
1
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
239
19
:
0
0
1
6
2
4
8
9
5
0
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
185
20
:
0
0
1
1
28
59
39
13
0
0
0
0
0
00141
21
:
0
0
0
2
2
8
5
1
3
1
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
121
22
:
0
0
2
1
1
2
3
5
2
1
7
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
80
23
:
0
0
0
1
8
16
11
10
1
0
0
0
0
0047
46
9
5
4
4
8
6
9
9
9
2
5
3
5
1
3
2
2
4
4
3
3572
13
%
1
5
%
2
4
%
2
8
%
1
5
%
4
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
100%
27
9
3
0
8
3
3
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
2
6
9
3
2
0
0
001268
8%
9
%
9
%
6
%
3
%
1
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
35%
07
:
0
0
0
7
:
0
0
1
0
:
0
0
1
0
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
0
6
:
0
0
0
3
:
0
0
0
5
:
0
0
07:00
12
0
8
1
7
1
5
3
2
3
1
0
3
1
1
292
19
0
2
3
6
5
3
8
7
8
2
4
3
5
1
0
6
1
5
1
1
0
0
002304
5%
7
%
1
5
%
2
2
%
1
2
%
3
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
65%
14
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
2
2
:
0
0
17:00
11
0
6
3
9
2
1
2
4
7
5
1
4
4
1
1
311
A
M
7
-
9
NO
O
N
1
2
-
2
PM
4
-
6
Off Peak Volumes
Vo
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
V
o
l
u
m
e
%
48
0
13
%
4
1
6
12
%
5
9
0
17
%
2
0
8
6
58%
Su
m
m
a
r
y
ADT 3572
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
St
r
ee
t
N
a
m
e
Tw
e
e
d
y
L
n
85
t
h
32
95
t
h
35
50
t
h
24
Av
e
r
a
g
e
24
15
t
h
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
16
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
t
a
&
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
SP
E
E
D
Tw
e
e
d
y
L
n
s
/
o
S
u
v
a
S
t
6/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
Su
mm
a
r
y
To
t
a
l
s
%
o
f
T
o
t
a
l
s
AM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
AM
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Al
l
S
p
e
e
d
s
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
Vo
l
u
m
e
PM
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
%
P
M
PM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
s
600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 261-3050
www.fehrandpeers.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
105
5
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
.
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
.
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
.
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
.
Imp
e
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
.
Par
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
.
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
.
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
.
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
.
Stewart and Gray Rd.
Imperial Hwy.
Not to Scale
N
INTERSECTIONS EVALUATED (AM AND PM PEAK HOURS)
FIGURE 1
1
2
3
4
5
105
5
Flor
e
n
c
e
A
v
e
.
Old
R
i
v
e
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
d
.
Fire
s
t
o
n
e
B
l
v
d
.
Ste
w
a
r
t
a
n
d
G
r
a
y
R
d
.
Imp
e
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
.
Par
a
m
o
u
n
t
B
l
v
d
.
Dow
n
e
y
A
v
e
.
Bro
o
k
s
h
i
r
e
A
v
e
.
Lak
e
w
o
o
d
B
l
v
d
Wo
o
d
r
u
f
f
A
v
e
.
Stewart and Gray Rd.
Imperial Hwy.
Not to Scale
N
INTERSECTIONS EVALUATED (SCHOOL DISMISSAL PEAK HOUR)
FIGURE 2