Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes-01-17-77-Adjourned Regular Meeting55631 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 77. 1977 The City Council of the City of Downey held an adjourned regular meeting at 5:00 p.m.. January 17. 1977. in the Council Chamber of the Downey City Hall. Mayor Hazel N. Scotto presiding. PRESENT: Council Members: William L. Greene Richard M. Jennings, Mayor Pro Tem Kenneth J. Miller Hazel N. Scotto, Mayor ABSENT: Theodore H. Jackman (arrived at 5:05 p.m.) ALSO PRESENT: Charles W. Thompson, City Manager Ervin Spindel, Director of Community Development William L. Goggin, City Planner Robert L. Shand, City Clerk -Treasurer Mayor Scotto announced the purpose of the meeting is to study the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the section regarding signs. Mayor Scotto asked for and received verbal consent from the City Council to consider a Resolution on Tract No. 32849. RESOLUTION NO. 3370 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY APPROVING THE FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP OF TRACT NO. 32849 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE SUBDIVIDERS AND ACCEPTANCE OF A LETTER OF CREDIT IN LIEU OF SURETY BONDS (CALADRE AVENUE) The Resolution was read by title only. It was moved by Councilman Jennings, seconded by Councilman Greene, and so ordered to waive further reading. A discussion was held regarding the $1.543.53 oark fee. It was moved by Councilman Jennings, seconded by Councilman Miller, and passed by unanimous vote to adoot Resolution No. 3370 and anorove the park fee as recommended in Mr. Soindel's memorandum of January 10, 1977. Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Councilman Jennings said he is ready to vote on the sign section of the ordinance except for one small change on Page V following Page 268, regarding amortization of signs. He would like to remove paragraph 2 on Page V (replacement value of signs) and completely remove Schedule 3: billboards are to be included in Schedule 2. Discussion followed. The requested change would give all billboards six years amortization. All billboards are over $6,000. It was moved by Councilman Jennings to adopt, with changes, Section 9146.02 through 9146. Discussion was held regarding sending recommendations back to the Planning Commission. Councilman Greene said he is not ready to vote on the question. Councilman Jackman indicated he would like more time. Mayor Scotto set the next study session for 5:00 p.m., January 31, 1977. The study continued beginning with Page 268B. Mr. Goggin referred to the sign list oreoared for the Council by the Chamber of Commerce, who has some objections. The Chamber favors a large sign and wants a clarification of what constitutes a shopping center. Mr. Goggin said newer shooning centers have very un-to-date small signs. Council_ Minutes 1/17/77 (adjourned) -1- r C2 Discussion centered on marquees. Page 268. Mr. Goggin reviewed marquee sign limitations. The study continued on Page 268a. Councilman Jennings raised a question concerning cumulative action signs wherein lights are used for displaying temperature and hours of day as compared to scintillating signs. Speaking to the Chamber of Commerce's 0000sition to maintenance of signs and questions regarding additional personnel, Mr. Goggin said the City should have the right to force establishments to upgrade defective signs. Also, he stated, a restriction in the ordinance will enable the City to do something about sign colors. Councilman Jennings questioned signs painted or hanging in windows. Mr. Goggin continued with Page 268d,and commenting on the question raised by the Chamber regarding minor deviations (minor alignments), he said somebody has to supervise moving of signs; that after a permit is issued, it is reviewed by the 'Planning Division for checking out sign location. Discussion followed regarding facade signs. Mr. Goggin said he would come back with specific percentage recommendations for sign areas in answer to the Chamber's questions. Mr. Goggin explained Section 22 as defining sign standards according to zones. Also included in section are non -permit signs such as "for rent" signs. Real estate "for sale" signs do not require permits. "For rent" signs permanently displayed on apartment buildings are not allowed within the sign ordinance. Discussion ensued regarding enforcement of the sign ordinance. Apartment building name signs are considered as being permit signs. Outdoor advertising signs are limited to M-1 and M-2 zones. Mr. Goggin said he would compile some alternatives on outdoor signs for Council consideration. Councilman Jennings referred to Page V (as in Volvo) to discuss removal of Schedule 3. Discussion was held regarding continued use of billboard signs. Billboard signs would have same treatment as any other signs in the City. Six year amortization on signs was discussed in an effort to determine the length of time a billboard sign should remain in service after adoption of the ordinance. Councilman Miller favors Schedule 2 which should be changed to read "Signs and Billboards". Councilman Jennings questioned the size of real estate signs. Councilman Miller indicated he feels a real estate "for sale" sign should not be removed immediately upon entering into escrow because of pending contingencies. He suggested a minimum of 30 days. Discussion followed regarding size of "for sale" sign that is affixed to real estate sign. Mr. Lee Bucholz, Committee for Government Affairs, Downey Board of Realtors, spoke regarding escrow proceedings in relation to removal of real estate signs. He said the Board of Realtors recommends the sign removal should be at the time of recording the transaction, and the realtor whose sign is posted should have responsibility for removing the sign within three days following the recording date of sale. Mr. Bucholz explained why realtor signs emphasize name of realtor and telephone number as the principal attraction rather than the words "for sale", and realtors rely on advertising their name and telephone number as the contact for prospects. Councilman Miller said he favors the 30 days from entering into escrow as being ample time for leaving signs on display. Mr.. Goggin said on January 30th he will bring back proposals containing the "30 day" clause for timing the removal of real estate signs. He favors Larger lettering for the "for sate" nortion of real estate signs. A two-year abatement period will be suggested. Information will. be forthcoming to the Council on January 31st for discussion at a meeting on February 7th. Council Minutes 1/17/77 (adjourned) -2- a56 33 It was moved by Councilman Greene and seconded by Councilman Miller to start the next study session meeting at 5:30 p.m, and eat at 5:00 p.m. Mayor Scotto so ordered that the February 7, 1977 meeting will start at 5:30 p.m. The Council then discussed changing the amateur radio study session to 5:30 p.m. The Council proposed to meet also on January 31st to discuss Child Care Center and Amateur Radio sections. Discussion resumed on signs, Page 253, line 5. A question was raised regarding requirement for posting of cash bond for displaying political signs. Councilman Miller suggested requiring a cash bond if a candidate intends to post political signs. If signs are posted by "unbonded" candidates, the signs would be removed by the City. Councilman Jackman questioned this procedure due to the 30-day notice requirement by the City. Mr. Thompson questioned such procedure and suggested checking with the City Attorney. During discussion, he also reminded the Council that the State Elections Code cannot be preempted. Councilman Miller inquired as to the quantity of political signs allowable on a parcel of property. Councilman Jackman said he believes the limit is one sign per candidate, reference Page 252, line 19. Mr. Coggin will return to the January 31st meeting with data on child care centers and amateur radio antennas. On February 7th the Council will discuss all other points regarding signs. Another remaining issue is garage sales, R-1 zone, Page 49, line 18. Proposed as one garage sale per calendar year, not to exceed two consecutive weekends. Mer- chandise to consist of resident's personal goods. Space to be limited to square footage of driveway ol.us square footage of garage. or 400 square feet of front yard if no garage or driveway exists. Discussion followed regarding an emergency ordinance to control garage sales. However, this would involve separate action by the Planning Commission and would require a hearing. Mayor Scotto commented on a letter of February, 1976, from Mr. Jack Robinson asking the Council to move ahead on the garage sale issue. Discussion was held regarding "Open House" real estate directional signs on public right-of-way and on private property. This is not a oart of the Comore- hensive Zoning Ordinance. Mayor Scotto asked for comments on levying a $5.00 fee to defray costs for policing of permit enforcement situation. A question exists on whether or not a garage sale permit requirement could be enforced. Councilman Jackman advocated a no -fee permit for garage sale. Mr. Coggin will bring back a report on the no -fee permit procedure February 8th, as well as data on the emergency ordinance. Councilman Jennings said there are only two pages for Property Development Standards. It was moved by Councilman Jackman, seconded by Councilman Greene, and passed by the following vote to adjourn the meeting. AYES: 4 Council Members- Greene, Miller, Jackman, Scotto NOES: 1 Council Members: Jennings The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 o.m. Robert L. Shand, City Clerk -Treasurer Hazel . Scotto. Mayor Council Minutes 1/17/77 (adjourned) -3-