Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 10-24-00 - Regular Meeting MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL 61361 .E OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY OCTOBER 24, 2000 The City Council of the City of Downey held a regular meeting at 7:41 p.m., October 24, 2000, in the Council Chamber of the Downey City Hall, Mayor Keith McCarthy presiding. PRESENT: Council Members: Keith McCarthy Mayor Robert C. Winningham Mayor Pro Tem Meredith H. Perkins Gary P. McCaughan, M.D. ABSENT: Barbara J. Riley (excused) ALSO PRESENT: Gerald M. Caton, City Manager Charles Vose, City Attorney Judith McDonnell, City Clerk - Treasurer Lee Powell, Assistant City Manager Desi Alvarez, Director of Public Works John Finch, Police Chief Darrell George, Director of Community/Economic Development James Jarrett, Director of Community Services Lowell Williams, Finance Director Ron Yoshiki, Asst. Director of Community Dev. /City Planner Bruce English, Paramedic Coordinator Christina Vogel, Special Projects Coordinator Jason Mikaelian, Assistant Planner Jeff Turner, Battalion Chief Steven Yee, Economic Development Coordinator June Yotsuya, Assistant to the City Manager Shirley Conte, Executive Secretary PRESENTATIONS: None HEARINGS Mayor McCarthy opened the public hearing to CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF UNION DE TAXISTAS INDEPENDIENTES TAXUU.T.I. TAXI FOR A PERMIT TO CONDUCT TAXICAB SERVICE IN THE CITY OF DOWNEY. Ms. McDonnell affirmed receipt of the Proof of Publication. It was moved by Council Member McCaughan, seconded by Council Member Perkins, and so ordered to receive and file. Council Minutes 10/24/00 -1- 15 2 Ms. Yotsuya referred to requirements in the Downey Municipal Code for taxi service and noted Mr. Cabrera provided all necessary documents. The Downey Police Department conducted a background investigation, which revealed nothing to prevent U.T.I. Taxi from safely operating a taxi service in the City of Downey. She pointed out Mr. Cabrera is currently licensed in the cities of Santa Monica and Vernon. There was no correspondence received regarding this matter. Mayor McCarthy asked if the representative of U.T.I. Taxi would like to address the Council. Hilda Rodriguez, representing U.T.I. Taxi, submitted documents for the Council's review and thanked the Council for the opportunity to present the request for a permit. She mentioned U.T.I.'s experience in the transportation business and felt they would help the community. There being no one else to speak, it was moved by Council Member McCaughan, seconded by Council Member Perkins and so ordered to close the hearing. Council Member Winningham asked if the information provided is followed up to make sure nothing has expired and was informed this is standard procedure by the Police Department. Council Member Perkins thanked Ms. Rodriguez for the report submitted and noted U.T.I. is presently doing business in two other cities with no problems and have applied to operate their service in three other cities, and it appears permits will be issued. Council Member McCaughan mentioned concern with where the taxis will stand, such as in front of schools, by bus stops, or in residential neighborhoods, which he noted are inappropriate. Mayor McCarthy inquired as to how many cabs were in the fleet and was advised there are ten. Mr. Rodriguez noted they will not concentrate in Downey but will be in and out of the City. It was moved by Council Member Winningham, seconded by Council Member McCaughan, and unanimously carried (4 -0) to approve an application for permit by Union De Taxistas Independientes/U.T.I. Taxi to conduct taxicab service in the City of Downey. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS The following citizens spoke regarding their concern with a shortage of space at Rio San Gabriel Park for Pop Warner Football/Downey Razorbacks. It was noted the football program shares use of this park with adult baseball teams and feel this is a safety issue for the children: Mr. Ingalls, 9518 Meadow, founder of Downey Pop Warner Football Jeff Wheeler, Coach Alicia Wheeler Kelly McGinty Desiree Rojas, Cheerleader for the Razorbacks Dawn Flores David Bowers, 10620 Dolan Avenue Council Minutes 10/24/00 -.2- 6156241 Mr. Caton referred to an agreement reached at a meeting today whereby adult softball will be relocated to another site for their first evening game, so as not to conflict with the football program. The possibility of the Razorbacks beginning their practice a half -hour earlier, to provide more time at the facility, was also considered. The Recreation and Community Services Commission will be requested to provide a permanent solution and he pointed out changes in State Law that do not allow Council action on matters not listed on the Agenda. Mayor McCarthy requested staff investigate the possibility of working with the Downey Unified School District for the recreational use of the field at Columbus High School that is currently not being used. HEARINGS (Cont.) Mayor McCarthy opened the public hearing on STREET VACATION NO. 174 — MARGARET STREET, BETWEEN BROOKSHIRE AVENUE AND PATTON ROAD, which was continued from the Council Meeting of September 26, 2000. Ms. McDonnell affirmed receipt of the Affidavit of Posting of Notice. It was moved by Council Member Winningham, seconded by Council Member Perkins, and so ordered to receive and file. Mr. Alvarez explained a Resolution declaring the intent to vacate Margaret Street was adopted on August 22, 2000. He reviewed the traffic study completed August 29th, which was approved at the Planning Commission Meeting of September 6th, and stated the vacation of Margaret Street between Brookshire Avenue and Patton Road is consistent with the General Plan. He advised the utility companies were notified of the intent to vacate and of the public hearing, as it will be necessary to retain easements for overhead Edison power lines, for Verizon telephone lines, for underground gas lines, and for a storm drain catch basin. There was no correspondence received regarding this matter. There being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, it was moved by Council Member Perkins, seconded by Council Member Winningham, and so ordered to close the hearing. RESOLUTION NO. 6404 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY ORDERING THE VACATION OF MARGARET STREET (ALLEY) BETWEEN BROOKSHIRE AVENUE AND PATTON ROAD The Resolution was read by title only. It was moved by Council Member McCaughan, seconded by Council Member Perkins, and unanimously carried (4 -0) to waive further reading and adopt. Council Member Winningham questioned who would bear the cost of undergrounding, if Downey Regional Medical Center decides to remove the overhead phone and transmission lines, and was advised the utility companies would seek reimbursement for that cost. Council Minutes 10/24/00 -3- nom, Mayor McCarthy inquired if this was in the plans and was informed it was not in immediate plans but may be at some point in the future. Mayor McCarthy opened the public hearing on ZONE CHANGE NO. 00 -56 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11914 AND 11920 DOWNEY AVENUE. Ms. McDonnell affirmed receipt of the Proof of Publication. It was moved by Council Member Winningham, seconded by Council Member Perkins, and so ordered to receive and file. Mr. Yoshiki narrated slides noting the General Plan delineates these properties as Medium Density Residential, the land use policy for multiple- family developments. The current zoning is C -1 (Neighborhood Commercial), which makes these two properties non - conforming in terms of zoning and existing use. There is currently a 20 -unit apartment development at 11914 Downey Avenue and the recommendation is to change the zoning on this property to R -3 (Multi - Family Residential), which is consistent with the medium density classification of the General Plan. The property at 11920 Downey Avenue is developed as a single family home, with the requested zoning of R -3 -0 (Multiple- Family Residential /Ownership). He pointed out the Planning Commission processed a plan for a four -lot condominium project, and the changes in zoning would bring both properties in conformance with the General Plan. He responded to comments from the Council. There was no correspondence received regarding this matter. There being no one present to speak in favor or in opposition of the zone Change, it was moved by Council Member Winningham, seconded by Council Member Perkins, and so ordered to close the hearing. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONE ON PROPERTIES FROM C -1 (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) TO R -3 (MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND R -3 -0 (MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - OWNERSHIP) FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 11914 AND 11920 DOWNEY AVENUE RESPECTIVELY, ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 6258- 009 -019 AND 6258- 009 -020 The Ordinance was read by title only. It was moved by Council Member Winningham, seconded by Council Member Perkins, and unanimously carried (4 -0) to waive further reading and introduce. Mayor McCarthy opened the public hearing on DOWNTOWN PLAN NO. 00 -77 — OVERLAY ZONE. Ms. McDonnell affirmed receipt of the Proof of Publication. It was moved by Council Member Perkins, seconded by Council Member Winningham, and so ordered to receive and file. Council Minutes 10/24/00 -4- 1 83 Mr. George noted this is an exciting time in the downtown area with regard to g revitalization efforts comin g i to fruition. He advised the proposed downtown overlay zone is a planning Tannin tool to work with current and future business operators to develop a more pedestrian friendly downtown and to impact the types and quality of businesses locating there. He reviewed the total downtown revitalization package, mentioning various programs initiated, and noted the Fransen Company was hired to seek tenants and work with current property owners to create opportunities for revitalization. Mr. Mikaelian explained the overlay zone reflects input from a variety of sources, such as the Blue Ribbon Committee, Downtown Merchants' Committee, Downey Chamber of Commerce, City Council Downtown Subcommittee, Planning Commission and the City Management Team. He reviewed boundaries, landmarks, and a variety of elements, such as g signing, development standards, outdoor dining and parking and referred to businesses complimentary to a pedestrian and downtown type environment, such as gift shops, music stores, restaurants and coffeehouses. He noted existing uses would be considered transitional and remain as lon g as they are in operation. He reviewed development standards, both present and proposed, and submitted a corrected sheet for Page 15, Section 3, Development Standards, (d) Building Setbacks, which incorporates the wording change "encourage" instead of "required" to make the standards more flexible while still meeting the need to make the property pedestrian friendly. He advised that parking requirements were relaxed in the downtown area for retail and restaurants, with office parking requirements remaining the same. There was no correspondence received regarding this matter. Mayor McCarthy asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak regarding the downtown plan. Guy Sterner, owner of property at 18145 Firestone Boulevard, complimented the Council for having the vision to return Downey Avenue to what it historically was, the center core of Downey, and recognized former Mayor and Council Member Joyce Lawrence, who initiated the direction to revise downtown Downey. He felt the overlay zone had many good points and offered flexibility, but noted two concerns. He referred to Page 15 of the Downtown Plan, which deals with development standards, mentioning the lot dimension requirement of 12,000 square feet and store frontage requirement of 25 feet, noting most lots and stores in this area do not meet these requirements. He questioned whether smaller properties become non - conforming or cannot be remodeled or rebuilt if struck by a major disaster, if the proposed Ordinance is adopted. George Montero, owner of property at 11016 Myrtle Street in the development area and resident at 7907 Eighth Street, submitted a letter to the Council and read its content. He expressed opposition to the development standard for a minimum lot size of 12,000 square feet, as he felt it put owners of smaller lots in a non - conforming status. He questioned whether he would be able to rebuild or remodel his building if struck by a catastrophe, since he does not meet the minimum standard and stated he has owned his business for 18 years and should have the right to maintain it. Richard B. Pridham, 10402 Bellman Avenue, referred to two street lights on the northeast corner of Second Street at La Reina Avenue that are approximately 18 inches apart, both operational, and suggested one be removed during the new development project. Council Minutes 10/24/00 - 5 - 6136 4 David Bowers, 10620 Dolan Avenue, reiterated the uestions of the first q two speakers and noted he felt the downtown plan was a step in the right direction to improve the ability p t e ability of businesses to set up shop within Downey. There being no one else to speak to the Downtown Plan, it was moved by Council Member McCaughan, seconded by Council Member Perkins, and unanimously carried (4-0) Y to close the hearing. Council Member Winningham mentioned Mr. Sterner's comment was up brought u at the -- brought Downtown Merchant's Meeting and was referred to staff. He referred to Page 4 of the staff report, Development & Parking Standards and read Paragraph 2, noting the minimum storefront width requirement was excluded from the overlay zone. He also has concern with the 12,000 square foot lot size, noting the Council Subcommittee initially looked at consolidation of parcels for possibly larger retail uses and realized this would not be the case and felt this issue should be revisited. He responded to Mr. Pridham, noting one streetlight will be removed. He mentioned he was pleased at the progress on Downey Avenue after just one week. Council Member Perkins suggested leaving the hearing open and coming back with additional information on the 12,000 feet lot size. He referred to the question of remodelin g or rebuilding non - conforming lots if a disaster hit. Mr. Yoshiki explained that staff would like to impose the 12,000 square foot lot size requirement on newly sub - divided properties only. For existing properties, which are legal lots of Y gp p � g record even though they are non - conforming in size, they are able to build a development consistent with both the underlying zone and the overlay zone, as long as they meet the basic requirements. He responded to comments from the Council. Council Member McCaughan stated if a property had a transitioned use and suffered a catastrophe, then the catastrophe clause comes into operation, but only on the use and not the property. If the existing business is not on the list of future uses when the overlay comes in, the use comes into play as a restrictive moratorium. He urged the upcoming Council to continue to pursue the downtown project. Suzie Villa, stated buildings being erected have steps to enter and people in wheelchairs cannot access them, sometimes having to enter through the back door. She inquired if new buildings and businesses will have access for the disabled and was informed they must comply with regulations on this issue. Council Member Perkins felt the questions presented by the speakers and Council have been answered and suggested introducing the Ordinance and closing the hearing. Mayor McCarthy inquired if a change in ownership of the same transitional business would allow that business to remain and was informed the transitional status would not change. He noted this project goes back to the early 1990's and looked forward to the project. There being no one else to speak, it was moved by Council Member McCaughan, seconded by Council Member Perkins, and so ordered to close the hearing. Council Minutes 10/24/00 -6- 475 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY ADOPTING DOWNTOWN PLAN NO. 00 -77 ESTABLISHING A DOWNTOWN OVERLAY ZONE The Ordinance was read by title only. It was moved by Council Member McCaughan, seconded b y Council Member Perkins, and unanimously carried (4 -0) to waive further reading and introduce. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Cont.) Zenaida Guerra, 7975 East Second Street, commented on ongoing problems with the gas station next door to her home and referred to a letter she submitted dated September 28, 1995, reporting a leak in the underground tanks at this gas station. She mentioned a report from the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works dated December 8, 1997, when these underground tanks were removed and changed, which states there was significant contamination at the site. She submitted copies of various letters sent to City staff. Mayor McCarthy mentioned having several conversations with Ms. Guerra and noted he requested the City Planner and Traffic Engineer to meet with representatives from ARCO to see what can be done about this property and would inform her of the results when available. David Bowers, 10620 Dolan Avenue, requested staff's review of light pole No. 929 at 8243 Duesler Lane that is extremely dim. He contacted Southern California Edison and was informed this is a City of Downey pole. Richard B. Pridham, 10402 Beliman Avenue, mentioned placing a lot of political signs in the ground during the last few weeks and visiting areas in the City he normally does not see. He indicated many things are going well in the City and cited in particular the downtown area. HEARINGS (Cont.) Mayor McCarthy opened the public hearing on PROPOSED DOWNEY MUNICIPAL CODE (DMC) AMENDMENT RELATING TO FRONT YARD AREAS AND MAINTENANCE FOR R -1 (SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND R -2 (TWO- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONES; AND PERMITTING CARPORTS AS AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN THE REAR YARDS IN THE R -1 (SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE. Ms. McDonnell affirmed receipt of the Proof of Publication. It was moved by Council Member Perkins, seconded by Council Member Winningham, and so ordered to receive and file. Mr. Yoshiki noted this Ordinance was considered earlier in the year and involves the front yard area and a Code amendment addressing carports in single- family zones. He narrated slides and reviewed restrictions surveyed in other cities regarding the front yard area. He noted the limitations in Downey are set on a 20 -foot setback and it was felt this provision needs to be revisited to assist Code Council Minutes 10/24/00 -7- i ri G .)4 Enforcement, as it was felt the Code was deficient in this area. He reviewed suggestions to alleviate this situation and noted the R -2 zone was included as it conforms to the same building setback and g landscaping requirements as the R -1. He referred to the typical front yard setback area (A) and subsequent front yard area (B) that would be considered with the same requirements. He read the definition of these areas, noting the Code change and added language, which gives Code Enforcement the ability to enforce requirements and insure that the aesthetic areas of these ro erties will be p p maintained. He referred to carports, which have historically been addressed as an alternate means of satisfying the covered parking requirements of the Code for single- family properties. The Code currently provides that when the carport is in front of the existing yard, it requires design review to integrate the design into the design of the home. The concern is that carports have taken on the shape of a shed roof. The Code amendment eliminates the carport as a replacement for the required garage and can only be permitted for accessory parking in the rear of the dwelling, subject to design review, and with a structure compatible with the existing appearance and design of the residence. There was no correspondence received regarding this matter. Mayor McCarthy asked if there was anyone present to speak regarding the proposed Code amendment. Diane Boggs, 10568 Chaney Avenue, stated she hoped the Ordinance addresses her concern with the installation of temporary carports, which consists of an aluminum cloth cover on poles. She noted seeing more and more of these throughout the City and suggested, if not already included, that this be addressed. David Bowers, 10620 Dolan Avenue, mentioned his concern with the City stating what residents can do with the front yard setback and the area beyond the setback to the front of the house. He referred to DMC Section 9150.00, Accessory Parking and Carports, stating there are many houses where there is no room to add these facilities in the back. His main concern is the front yard issue and that carports must go through the Design Review Board process. He inquired about the cost for this process, noting he heard it was $2,500, and felt homeowners would not want to pay. Richard B. Pridham, 10402 Beliman Avenue, mentioned seeing two of these structures stacked one behind the other in front of a house and boats and motor homes stored in front yards. He referred to the recent restriction on the size of commercial trucks allowed to park in residential neighborhoods, which he felt was not being enforced. He thought the front yard issue was a good idea but suggested considering enforcement of Code requirements already passed. There being no else to speak, it was moved by Council Member McCaughan, seconded by Council Member Perkins, and so ordered to close the hearing. Council Minutes 10/24/00 -8- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY AMENDING SECTIONS 9110 AND 9112 OF THE DOWNEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO FRONT YARD AREAS AND MAINTENANCE FOR R -1 (SINGLE FAMILY) AND R -2 (TWO-.FAMILY) RESIDENTIAL ZONES; AND TO SECTION 9150 OF THE DOWNEY MUNICIPAL CODE PERMITTING CARPORTS AS AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN THE REAR YARDS, IN THE R -1 AND R -2 ZONES The Ordinance was read by title only. It was moved by Council Member McCaughan, seconded by Council Member Perkins, and unanimously carried to waive further reading and introduce. Prior to the vote, Council Member McCaughan referred to Mr. Pridham's comments regarding enforcement of present Code requirements. He mentioned having pictures of what is taking place in the area beyond the 20 -foot setback, noting 85 percent of the homes in town only have the 20 -foot setback but properties with deeper lots and an area beyond the 20 foot setback are presently not enforceable. He referred to canopies in legally permitted driveways and asked if the driveway is included in this Ordinance. Mr. Yoshiki explained staff is of the opinion that the Ordinance provides Code Enforcement the means to enforce the requirements when the canopy is on the driveway. When it is outside the driveway area, the requirements for area (B) take over. Council Member McCaughan referred to Page 2, Section 9110.12 (c)(1), b), and assumed the reference to driveway meant permitted and the response was yes. He also referred to the reference in this section to inoperable motor vehicles and questioned why it states inoperative, feeling it should be made clear this means operative and inoperative. Mr. Yoshiki replied this was done in terms of enforcement and provides a clear ability to determine a violation. Mr. Vose referred to the end of this section regarding long -term storage of vehicles and noted the question is whether someone should be allowed to park their car there at all. When Council Member McCaughan commented that parking in front yards is not allowed and wondered why residents were given the window of whether it was short -term storage and operative or inoperative vehicle parking, he was told it could be removed from the Ordinance and would be a policy issue for the Council. Mr. Yoshiki indicated staff is looking at driveways outside the 20 -foot setback with the idea that vehicles can legitimately park there, whereas off the driveway area is not allowed. Council Minutes 10/24/00 - 1. C .incil Member McCaughan referred to the area for carports, and noted the Building Code does not allow a carport in place of a garage. The Planning Commission suggested allowing a porte cochere, which is different than a carport, and is a structure that comes out from the house separate from the garage. A carport in the backyard might still be allowed as long as it goes through the design review process. He favored the Ordinance and felt it is needed in the City. Council Member Winningham noted there is a need for defining the area beyond the setback, advising many people have cemented this area under the guise of decorative landscaping and turned it into a parking lot. This Ordinance is a tool to overcome this loophole and noted the porte cochere is defined in the Code separately and large lots can utilize this feature in the design of the home. Council Member Perkins mentioned concern with homes in his area built in 1953 with garages converted into dens, etc., and with beautiful carports, assuming these would be left as is. He expressed concern with 25 -foot lots in the Golden Park Area where many do not have garages and hoped Code Enforcement would be lenient in this area. Mayor McCarthy referred to the comment regarding the cost of a Design Review Hearing and was informed it would be around $500. He suggested staff consider lowering this fee. He also referred to lot sizes and felt a minimum lot size should be set to exempt lots such as the 25- foot lots previously mentioned. He inquired if washing a car on the lawn is illegal and was informed there is a certain amount of discretion used by the Police Officers but effort and time has been put into the issuance of citations for vehicles parked on the lawn. He then asked if car covers were addressed in the Ordinance wanting to make sure these were not prevented from being used and was informed the distinction was made only for car cover structures. He supported the effort to improve the appearance of homes but was concerned with homes where it is difficult to comply with this. He suggested staff review compliance in neighborhoods with 25- foot lots and also lowering the fee for design review. He hoped the press covers this as it affects every resident and homeowner in Downey, noting people have taken these issues for granted and need to be informed before hand. Council Member McCaughan clarified that the carport in the backyard does not replace the garage, it is simply for additional accessory parking. He referred to smaller lots and hoped discretion would be used and not be simply established that small lots can park in the front yard. Mr. Caton suggested differentiating between paving versus concrete used in landscaping. Mayor McCarthy felt a distinction should be made to allow property owners the choice to pave these areas as long as they are not utilized for parking. Mr. Vose stated there is a difference in utilizing this area for landscaping as opposed to part of the cement parking area and felt a clear -cut definition would be difficult. Council Member Winningham explained the plot plan process of Planning and felt the discretion could be made at this point to determine if the plans had the potential of being a parking area and landscaping could be required prior to approval. Council Minutes 10/24/00 -10- CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS FOR REMOVAL ti I -3: fip Council Member McCaughan stepped away from the dais at 9:53 p.m. Agenda Item VI -E -3, IMPLEMENTATION OF CAL -CARD PROGRAM, was removed at the request of Council Member Perkins. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Council Member Winningham, seconded by Council Member Perkins, and unanimously carried (3 -0), with Council Member McCaughan momentarily excused, to waive further reading of the Resolutions and approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar as recommended: COUNCIL MINUTES: ADJOURNED AND REGULAR MEETINGS, OCTOBER 10, 2000: Approve. CASH CONTRACT NO. S.S. 490, STEWART AND GRAY ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION — PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD TO LAKEWOOD BOULEVARD (ACCOUNT NO. 26- 16490): Adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 6405 (ADOPT) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. M004 TO CITY OF DOWNEY /STATE MASTER AGREEMENT NO. 07 -5334, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON STEWART AND GRAY ROAD PURSUANT TO INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT CASH CONTRACT NO. 620, DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE PROJECT, DOWNEY AVENUE — UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD TO FIFTH STREET, AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES (ACCOUNT NO. 26- 16600): Approve an amendment to the existing contract with Construction Management Inspection and Associates to perform construction inspection services for the Downtown Streetscape Project under Cash Contract No. 620 and authorize the City Manager to execute said amendment: Approve. CASH CONTRACT NO. S.S. 499, PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD AT SUVA STREET, TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS — ADD PROTECTED LEFT -TURN SIGNAL PHASES (ACCOUNT NO. 26- 16454): Accept the traffic signal modifications completed and the maintenance responsibility for the improvements constructed at the intersection of Paramount Boulevard and Suva Street; and approve extra work under Change Order No. 1, totaling $2,979.70: Approve. Council Minutes 10/24/00 -11- - k 1'2639 __ CASH CONTRACT NO. 620 — INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM ALONG WEST SIDE OF PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD BETWEEN IMPERIAL HIGHWAY AND GARDENDALE STREET AND WIDENING SOUTHERLY SIDE OF FIRESTONE BOULEVARD AT OLD RIVER SCHOOL ROAD: CHANGE ORDER WITH LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING COMPANY: Authorize the Director of Public Works to issue a Contract Change Order to Los Angeles Engineering Company under the Downtown Streetscape Project: Approve. WARRANTS ISSUED: NO. 160460 — 160892; WIRE TRANSFER NO. 149 AND NO. 30000016 — 23: $4,101,466.55: Approve. CONTRACT FOR UTILITY BILL AUDITING USING STATE MASTER AGREEMENT: Approve a contract with Richard Heath and Associates to audit utility bills using the State of California Master Agreement: Approve. CONSULTING AGREEMENT WITH KJSERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY OF DOWNEY 6TH CYCLE USED OIL RECYCLING BLOCK GRANT: Approve an agreement with KJServices and grant authority to the City Manager to execute the Agreement: Approve. AGREEMENT WITH ARTIST TERRY SCHOONHOVEN FOR "ART IN PUBLIC PLACES" ARTIST DESIGN SERVICES RELATED TO THE DOWNEY TRANSIT CENTER: Approve an agreement to design and produce a tile mural for the Downey Transit Center: Approve. RESOLUTION NO. 6406 (ADOPT) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY DESIGNATING BORSON STREET AS A THROUGH STREET AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH GLENSHIRE ROAD RESOLUTION NO. 6407 (ADOPT) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY SUPPORTING THE CENTRAL BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT'S RECYCLED WATER PROJECT GRANT APPLICATION RESOLUTION NO. 6408 (ADOPT) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY AMENDING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF DOWNEY AND THE DOWNEY CITY EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION/MAINTENANCE UNIT Council Minutes 10/24/00 -12- � t ti i .12, 03 1. RESOLUTION NO. 6409 (ADOPT) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A PETITION FOR INTERVENTION IN THE NUEVA AZALEA POWER PLANT PROJECT WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION ORDINANCE NO. 1089 (ADOPT) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY AMENDING SECTION 9118.04, H -M (HOSPITAL MEDICAL ARTS ZONE) AND 9120.04, C -P (PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ZONE) OF THE DOWNEY MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING WALL, ROOF AND PENTHOUSE MOUNTED WIRELESS CELLULAR ANTENNAS AS A PERMITTED USE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY'S DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ORDINANCES: None RESOLUTIONS: None ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATOR PROGRAM Bruce English, Emergency Medical Services Coordinator, provided a visual presentation, followed by a demonstration of the equipment. He thanked the Council for providing the funding to start the Automated External Defibrillator Program (AED's), noting AED's provide early defibrillation therapy to treat sudden cardiac arrest victims by analyzing heart rhythms. Fire Department personnel gave a demonstration of the equipment, which included citizen CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation), transitioning into Downey Fire Department cardiac arrest intervention. AED's are provided on one fire engine in each district and on the new ambulance, with two manual defibrillators on the paramedic squads. It is hoped an AED will be placed at City Hall in the future. The cost of the equipment was provided in last year's budget, training was provided by Downey Fire Department Staff, and an overview of the program was provided by Downey Fire Department's Medical Director, Doctor Guess. It was so ordered by the Mayor to receive and file. OTHER BUSINESS - Consent Calendar - Items removed by Council Approval IMPLEMENTATION OF CAL -CARD PROGRAM Council Member Perkins felt this was an excellent program and was an advance move by the City. He noted most companies are utilizing this program, as well as other cities. It is a cost saving program, with safeguards built in, such as card limitation of $500, with no personal products to be bought. He felt this was a move in the right direction. Council Minutes 10/24/00 - 3 It was moved by Council Member Perkins, seconded by Council Member Winningham, and unanimously carried (4 -0) to approve the implementation of a purchasing card program, referred to as CalCard, through the State of California, to assist employees with the purchasing of goods and materials and authorize the Finance Director to execute a Master Service Agreement with the State of California Department of General Services to participate in the program. OTHER BUSINESS - Council Members SKATEBOARD PARK DEVELOPMENT, CONSIDER APPROPRIATION OF DESIGN FUNDS AND RETENTION OF DESIGN ARCHITECT Mr. Jarrett explained the community requested the City consider developing a skateboard park, since a number of communities have these facilities. He noted one of the leading architects in Southern California and the Western United States is Steve Rose of Purkiss- Rose -RSI Architects, who has developed a number of skateboard parks throughout California and other states. Staff and Council Member Perkins visited skate parks during the summer to review the feasibility of developing a park in the City and Apollo Park and Independence Parks were considered as probable locations. The consensus was that Independence Park provides the greatest opportunity and least impact to surrounding neighborhoods. A design proposal was requested from Purkiss- Rose -RSI and submitted to the Council. Purkiss - Rose -RSI was requested to evaluate the existing sight for renovation of the present facilities, such as restrooms and the clubhouse facility utilized by the tennis program. He recommended retaining Purkiss- Rose -RSI Architects for preparation of preliminary design specifications and construction documents so the City will be prepared to move forward with the bidding process when Proposition 12 State Grants are received next year. Council Member Perkins mentioned visiting several locations and felt Independence Park offers the best opportunity. He noted the restroom facilities at Independence Park are poorly done and the intention is to incorporate the skate park with improvements to the present facilities. He felt this is a real win situation for the City and Parks and Recreation program. Council Member Winningham noted it was the dream of the Parks and Recreation Commission to bring a skateboard park to the community but the concern at the time was liability, which was overcome by legislation three years ago. He was in support of the facility and felt Independence Park was the best site and provided the opportunity to renovate the pro shop for the tennis center and the restrooms. He thanked Council Member Perkins and Mayor McCarthy for getting this project in motion. Council Member McCaughan supported the $50,000 initial appropriation for design specifications. He referred to the Girls Ponytail League, who utilizes this facility, and mentioned concern with the parking situation. He mentioned problems in other communities with skate parks and felt the City would not be free of liability. Mr. Vose said liability depends upon the level of supervision and the manner in which the park is run. Council Minutes 10/24/00 -14- 612033 Council Member Perkins noted the company selected has experience with these facilities and brings the community into the design. He hoped the Council would support the project, noting it is g Y projects one of four P 'ects he hopes to accomplish during his tenure on the Council and felt it would have a long -term affect on the youth in the community. Mr. Jarrett responded to the issue of parking, advising that whatever is developed will have to take into consideration parking requirements, the impact on tennis, softball, and entire use of the facility. The real benefit of using this firm is the fact they are first and foremost a park development company and added the development of skateboard parks about 8 to 10 years ago. Council Member Winningham referred to the skate park opened in Bell Gardens this past year, noting it had very little impact, as far as parking goes, because the youth generally skate in or utilize public transportation. He felt the skate park use would have the least amount of impact on the facility. Mayor McCarthy was in support of the project and hoped it would be referred to as a skate park and not a skate board park. Speaking to the issue of liability, he noted the best rated skate park in California is in Visalia - -it is non - supervised and non - fenced. He noted his concern about supervision. Mr. Jarrett indicated this would be discussed further, noting many of these facilities provide only moderate direct supervision. He explained there are legal ramifications of why not to provide direct supervision, which establishes a different level of responsibility. Mayor McCarthy noted the facility would improve the present tennis center facility, with the possibility of the Public Work's Yard being moved elsewhere and this area becoming an extension of Independence Park. He wanted staff to make sure they secure the funding source for the balance of the expense. Mr. Jarrett noted $1.3 million will come to the City from Proposition 12, which is a state park bond act recently passed. It was moved by Council Member Perkins, seconded by Council Member Winningham, and unanimously carried (4 -0) to appropriate Capital Project Funds in the amount of $50,000 and authorize an agreement with Purkiss- Rose -RSI Architects to prepare design specifications for the construction of a skateboard park. Prior to the vote, Council Member McCaughan suggested the City make sure the DowneyLlNK has a route that goes to this facility and allows kids in other Council Districts to have access. Roger Brassmer, 12744 Parrot Avenue, teacher at Downey High School, felt this will be a great move for the City. He commented on a new skate park in Santa Barbara that was built by the same developer proposed tonight, stating it is a great facility with no supervision. He mentioned a facility g in the State of Washington that has no street visibility, which is bad, noting if police cars can drive by and view the facility, this is all the supervision needed. Council Minutes 10/24/00 -15- 1 T. rt Guy Sterner, 10303 Downey Avenue, stated he recommended a skate ark a long time a p g ago. g He mentioned a park in Arcadia where his son lives and what made the facility successful was requiring the young people to raise a certain amount of money and to buy into the facility. The y outh held car washes and sales, etc. He felt the young people of Downey should be involved in the design of the facility and having the parents and youth involved is better than just giving it to them. Mayor McCarthy mentioned his neighbor received an absentee ballot for the wrong Council District and suggested everyone check their ballots to make sure they are accurate. Mayor McCarthy commented on items approved on the Consent Calendar, mentioning the approval of the City becoming an intervener on the Nueva Azalea Power Plant project and suggested gg e the Downey Unified School District and Downey Regional Medical Center join in this effort. Mayor McCarthy mentioned the progress on the project at the former Tahitian Village site. Mayor McCarthy indicated the YMCA/Rotary breakfast will be held on Saturday at Downey High School. Mayor McCarthy commended the Fire Department for their response to the explosion at the Coca -Cola Plant. Mayor McCarthy suggested consideration of putting in access to Independence Park through the new storage park being developed on Imperial Highway. Mayor McCarthy also suggested consideration in the future of a pedestrian mall on Third Street between City Hall and the Rives Mansion on Paramount Boulevard. Council Member Winningham referred to the map submitted by Mr. Ingalls of Pop Warner Football and asked if 300 foot outfields is typical of what has been allowed in the past and the response was yes. He noted this is a concern and will be addressed by staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission. _._... Council Member Winningham felt Mr. Sterner's suggestion that the youth "buy in" to the skateboard park was good, noting they would respect the facility more if they worked hard for it. Council Member Winningham announced the Pumpkin Patch to be held on Halloween at Furman Park, co- sponsored by the City and Downey Optimist and Soroptimist Clubs. Council Member Perkins wished everyone remaining in the audience a Happy Halloween. Council Member Perkins mentioned attending the City Employees' 5, 10 and 15 year service awards and complimented those employees. Council Member McCaughan requested staff come back at the next meeting with data on instituting an annual neighborhood assessment program and whether this can be done in -house or outside. Council Minutes 10/24/00 -16- G ,) OTHER BUSINESS - Staff Members Mr. Caton complimented the Fire, Police, and Public Works Departments for their response to the explosion at Coca -Cola, noting situations like this make people realize what a great City Downey is. Mr. Caton commented on tonight's Fire Department demonstration of the Automated External Defibrillator, and advised the average response time is just under five minutes from initiation of a 911 call, which is tremendous. ADJOURNMENT: 10:40 p.m. The meeting was adjourned to 6:30 p.m., November 14, 2000, in the Council Chamber of Downey City Hall. Q .! rte •� cJ rc dith E. McDonnell, City Clerk Keith McCarthy, Mayor H. \CCLERK\ SCONTE \MINUTE S \ccmn 1024 Council Minutes 10/24/00 -17- r