HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 6318 RESOLUTION NO 6 318
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY DENYING THE APPEAL AND
APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 25643 FOR PROPERTIES
AT 9066 FIRESTONE BOULEVARD, ZONED
LAKEWOOD/FIRESTONE SPECIFIC PLAN 91 -2
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Downey does hereby find, determine
and declare that:
A. An application was filed by Downey Hospitality Development, LLC
(hereinafter the Applicant) for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25643 to
consolidate two of the three lots that comprise the Project Site, and thus,
create a 2-acre lot and a .05 -acre lot in order to accommodate a 94 -room
hotel and a 6,800 square foot restaurant at 9066 Firestone Boulevard
(hereinafter "Subject Property"), zoned Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan
91 -2.
B. The Planning Commission held a duly - noticed public hearing on
December 1, 1999, and, after fully considering all oral and written
testimony and facts and opinions offered at the aforesaid public hearing,
adopted Resolution No. 2013 approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 25643.
C. An appeal of the decision of the Downey Planning Commission was filed
on December 3, 1999 by Frank A. Weiser on behalf of Mr. Arvin Pakekh,
who is both the owner and operator of the Days Inn Stonewood motel,
located at 11102 Lakewood Boulevard, Downey, California.
D. The City Council held a duly - noticed public hearing on January 11, 2000,
and, after fully considering all oral and written testimony and facts and
opinions offered at the aforesaid public hearing adopted Resolution No.
0113denying the appeal and approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 25643.
SECTION 2. Having considered all of the oral and written evidence presented
to it as said public hearing, the City Council further finds, determines and
declares that:
A. Tentative Parcel Map No. 25643 is consistent with the General Plan and
furthers its objectives and policies. Approval of the proposed map
involves assembling a lot that is more in conformance with the provisions
of the Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan No. 91 -2 and the specific plan is
consistent the Project Site's General Commercial General Plan category,
per Sections 65454 and 65455 of the California Government Code.
B. The design and improvements of the tentative map are consistent with
General Plan and furthers its objectives and policies. The consolidated
property is designated General Commercial, according to the General
Plan's Land Use Chapter and the site's intended shape will implement the
Chapter's land use parameters, since its area will be more than adequate
Resolution No. 6 318
Tentative Parcel Map 25643
Page 2
in size to accommodate the proposed improvements that are planned for
the site. 1
C. The Project Site is physically suitable for the proposed subdivision and
planned development since no geologic hazards are known to exist
onsite. Further, infrastructure, fire protection and water supply
improvements are readily available and will be provided to prepare the
site for the planned development.
D. The Project Site is physically suitable for the planned development, since
the project petitioner proposes to assemble a lot of sufficient size with
appropriate infrastructure improvements to support the types of uses that
the Lakewood/Firestone specific plan normally permits.
E. The design of the proposed subdivision and its proposed improvements
will not cause public health problems since the proposed map will bring
the site doser into conformance to the minimum area requirement of the
Lakewood /Firestone Specific Plan and furthers its objectives and policies.
F. The proposed subdivision's design and improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems, since the consolidated lot is of
sufficient size and the planned improvements are not of the type to create
public health problems. Further, a mitigated negative declaration has
been prepared, which indicates that by implementing the environmental
document's recommended mitigation measures, which the project
applicant has agreed to do, project implementation will not create any
significant adverse effects.
G. The design of the proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements
acquired by the public at large for access through or use the property
within the proposed subdivision, since such easements have been noted
on the tentative map or made a condition of approval.
H. In taking this action, the City Council has considered the effects of the
decision on housing needs of the region in which the City is located and
balanced those needs against the pubic service needs of city residents
and available fiscal and environmental resources.
The design of the lot and configuration of this subdivision provides for
passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities, since the proposed lot
is large enough to permit orientation of buildings to take advantage of
such opportunities.
J. The conditions imposed on the Subject Property by this action as
described in Exhibit A, are necessary to preserve the health, safety and
general welfare of the community and enable the City Council to make
the findings set forth in this section. The conditions are fair and
reasonable for the accomplishment of these purposes.
Resolution No. 6 318
Tentative Parcel Map 25643
Page 3
SECTION 3, An Initial Study of Environmental Impacts and Mitigated
Negative Declaration were prepared for Tentative Map No. 26543, in accordance with
the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the state CEQA
Guidelines and the City of Downey's Procedures for Implementing CEQA.
A. That the City of Downey had the Initial Study of Environmental
Impacts and Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared, and although
an environmental consulting firm prepared the environmental
documents, they reflect the independent judgement of the City of
Downey. Both the Initial Study and draft Mitigated Negative
Declaration were made available for public review and comment
beginning on November 10, 1999 to and including November 29,
1999.
B. A public hearing was held by the Planning Commission of the City of
Downey on December 1,1999, at which time evidence was heard on
the Initial Study and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration. At the
hearing, the Planning Commission fully reviewed and carefully
considered the environmental documents together with any comments
received during the public review period.
C. Based upon the Initial Study, draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and
any comments received during the public review process, approval of
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25643 and implementation of the
accompanying project will not have a significant adverse effect on the
environment.
D. In view of the foregoing, the City Council hereby certifies the
Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for Tentative Parcel Map No
25643 was prepared in accordance with CEQA. Therefore, the City
Council approves the Mitigated Negative Declaration along with its
findings, conclusions and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program that is setforth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated
by reference.
SECTION 4. Based upon the findings set forth in Sections 1, 2 and 3 of this
Resolution, the City Council of the City of Downey does hereby approve Tentative Parcel
Map No. 25643, subject to attached Exhibit B.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of January , 2000
/ , /i or 4
KEITH MC CARTHY, iayor
ATTEST:
11 ,..,....„, ; ,Asidt,,,,a
� ) ITH E . MC DONNELL, City Clerk
Resolution No. 6 318
Tentative Parcel Map 25643
Page 4
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City
7
Council of the City of Downey at a regular meeting held on the lit h day of January ,
2000, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: 5 Council Members: Winningham, Lawrence, McCaughan, Perkins, McCarthy
NOES: 0 Council Members: None
ABSENT: 0 Council Members: None
L,, 1 , //
,........_,
0 DITH E MC DONNELL , City Clerk
7
„.-►
Resolution No. 6318
Tentative Parcel Map 25643
Page 5
EXHIBIT A
HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOTEL AND RESTAURANT
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT SP -91.2A
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that when a public agency completes an
environmental document which includes measures to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects,
the public agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring program. This requirement ensures that
environmental impacts found to be significant will be mitigated. The reporting or monitoring program must
be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6).
In compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the attached MITIGATION MONITORING
AND REPORTING CHECKLIST, has been prepared for the Holiday Inn Express Hotel and Restaurant Project
at 9066 Firestone Boulevard, This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist is intended to provide
verification that all applicable Conditions of Approval relative to significant environmental impacts are
monitored and reported. Monitoring will include: 1) verification that each mitigation measure has been
implemented; 2) recordation of the actions taken to implement each mitigation; and 3) retention of records
in the Holiday Inn Express Hotel and Restaurant project file.
his Mitigation Monitoring Program delineates responsibilities for monitoring the project, but also allows
he City of Downey flexibility and discretion in determining how best to monitor implementation.
Monitoring procedures will vary according to the type of mitigation measure. Adequate monitoring consists
of demonstrating that monitoring procedures took place and that mitigation measures were implemented.
Reporting consists of establishing a record that a mitigation measure is being implemented, and generally
involves the following steps:
• The City of Downey distributes reporting forms to the appropriate agencies or City departments or
employs the City's existing reporting process for verification of compliance.
• Responsible entities verify compliance by signing the monitoring and reporting form and/or
documenting compliance using their own internal procedures when monitoring is triggered.
• Responsible parties provide the City of Downey with verification that monitoring has been conducted
and ensure, as applicable, that mitigation measures have been implemented.
Minor changes to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, if required, would be made in
accordance with CEQA and would be permitted after further review and approval by the City of Downey.
Such changes could include reassignment of monitoring and reporting responsibilities and/or program
redesign to snake any appropriate improvements. No change will be permitted unless the Mitigation
monitoring and Reporting Program continues to satisfy the requirements of Public Resources Code Section
1081',6
o
C V
a C c.!. '..:
... ell
4... .-. ..,
to :IfEq.:.
1A1 I -....-' .---:-, - ' ,..
IP .....F :: :i.-.-..
-.A:::. ---:...i,.......-.......-. I
> U ,,,,,...-.--:....-.....
- , .
:10 ow
-
p 7 ... .._
.ff----, Et r
_c ;:_:...„1,,t, E
&
„:„,.........„_:...___....,
1 ..„-.-- 2 t at
......- - 4 4 6 : 4 4 6 •., : t....., 4 . :.-:.; . : be
.... ....
e 1 ,..--:::gi.f•F LI 1.) c a 1 ' ' s 9 1 ii.. i3
,,-,......::.- ..-
..-,:77ti *...2 0 6 1 '2 ' 4 ; a 6 .1 Mk5
,-.÷171.7i.-"I i:-...3.1.....41
EF.....,-.151
.:,FiFti-.: CL AO -0 .o J if .. 41'1: s z 1 .c
0. 0 ....... X ..,
,....—....., '......".."... _,---r.j...*:
7 ,..!'
....:i'. 120 1..?-r
. :".--.1.10, Y....-1,7....":
....-...,..1, 1
i ,,. :P- '' .1r
0 - 715 ,. ..,..-1..: .
X - -- 4
n.
.-..* .
"C i . 7...--,:t...1 1
O .
7.: ';', ':-
• g .,,,,,, .._ t
,..
1:1 g 16 ...... . ..:;
. ..
. _
_ _ ... ,,-....,..:...:,..";
z 8 ‘.:: „.. • , tfl
;:-, *
. . L!, t in .1 i , ..L: . .... : " '. 5 1 5I t
‘ 'E 5 ;'--='...*'-" e I 5 • .........rel•
. -
. .• .
A .::; i'---: it — a- ce 75. et a. ---- c.7 E. -
OM ,,...,3„, ..:74.
..,..
...
g !
0 1.6 cri, bp 7.
,-.1-..,v.,,,.,:t...:=. ,__
f
...,......„,„,
ri z z s .-,., ,
.... ,....,,,,..•„ ., :,-,...,..-.
.00z. i W ." ' &ft3 ..
e
.
4
......
• iy.,....;
1 :1 11 ,Is um.
Am a
:., 4-. i
,,,,,, .4. u .
-1 1 , ..',:•••., ,,. ;f.. , 7 c
, ..„,,-E c '. c ..-.- .- .. . ..= u
E 1 1 ''-' tip
......
ry
ISJ ,r4 i... i t = ....'...7-
PI"' :14h°C ... ,
2 '.,--.-,- ea b 41..
K .0 , 7- ,....; - :::". .2 3
'al g ....z u
: sr
1.1.1 pi0 , O. ,t7., ; Z .?7. e A. ;?: k. :E ...7 z. - -. ...,..,
,,,,,,,,fn
t .,. C) 1 1-- L Cl 1.--• ' CO 0 E
I
..... eg
LA . _ .
,-:.C..4, -,-...=5:-.:---
-.:-...,;:...:..-:..:: _, _ i.'.:31iii:'•ii.
-.....,:h.,A
Z 0 Z -2.1.4 - 3: g k ri 00 . -0 t. bb
<
-5 1 b ,, I..- s .5 .,,T, .s r
„...:„..,:„....:....
..,....„.::::.,,,. t., ....... u .
„, . .. ... ... ..... „o = LI .. ,,,..:1.. :7 4 : : i.,...; ,... . ,. , ,,- ... e - to 4,,.
1' 2 z. 35. 1
< t.,..'. ■
CA Z
i I D g 0 4
E '3 , u
, nao .... 03 .... , • . .••
l i:Lz wi co • :,2 g i ...- - R
. 4.1'.....A . ,t :..
z sek- 1... . .1.-- S E
'u , 3 4) a..- •. , . 15
,..„. : 4 al tli
..c .... Z ;-,:, ' C 'I ...& b. ..?... 1 4
O. 0 l' '' ." :i'. 1 .''.; .r 0 • - ..0 0 .- - .,-.- : .- ,,o- •
0. x 0
L I -..... - CI & Z U ''...-.. 3 , - 8 I ,§ 'c I • c 2 --,...,-.---:•,.,....
a.1 -1, '''''r'i'-' ' = '-. 90 '"g C C '-`: ' """ -
td ..-j, I . .,:-. .2 $ .. 0 o 7 ...„-- ff 8 :„. u II ,,.. ,., _ . .:.- :,....
in * . " M'' ','''' a Q.E u 7.-'.
-- u f 7-: ' • • 0. c g
n/ tu ribTA 00 5 -, 5 g 1,- . iv b° R" 0 • I _ 4 4 -
— z c „ - , bo ,
3 - .s i
.,.
p4 1.111 )". Z , c ,a4 2 cc i s 0 -...; 1:)
. 47 ;;- : • ..., ' : = *tt ,..C S 'U ..5. • W E -
a : • : .: ,?„ _ u ". -:
.. - ._,.. _ To :::
- ... a . f...„ ,. � r 2 .. E0 0:.
2 ,.;„.
cl,
- I :: -_, ., .... ..10 T.-
X .? 1— as jth+ RI aj" =:-.'
....,1 ...r. :: .i...,. . , , .. .., c 3 .g g ..„,..-._--...-:, .2 Ts t •R i 1: ! . i
o a :.-..,.., . .2 ..5 c . i - .2 0 =6 ,c .- .,. 7--.. -: •-- : a,
X ..... 4'....• ao i v . P- aj '.•[:=..-.... ,- 6 , .• ,-
im'' . .: - ... ,. .. 1 .: -. . .- E - •_ .
' 5 - • .',, - & 1 .1 I fi t fl„„, ,:p r a ‘) ,..:,.
' (f ' CN1 C efi U cki ,... •
i 4) a - ,b c t• 12 a)
..,,,.. :':. • ' , .... c a
,,-. 4.. .... 0 4, r ,
...... .
dzi ... .
_ -E, ' ire ,c„ s ..... 4-- -5 . .. iti 1 t ato z
d u 0; 'a . i
re; = F . r; l
fei U 0
- ' -
. .... .
cp IW
I . ..
._ .
Cr) • 0 E R bb
vi •- .... - ,"
cm ccig ,
co
0 q
is. eil ..... . I e illi )
Q j ni > , ie 0 E
E I' :ii -- 0 a t in .. t
,,,
4, ft- Ts
pl.! t. t I:, a (fl
CA
6 P. z 1 I
z co 6 u ''
)...
c CL
a 4- .....,
0 gi 0) MI in Q- - S, a
in c OZO)
I i
o) (1) CD
(CI M U)
"
_'4 C'D Er o
„:„ _
CD 0
Ft. ar 5 0 o 3 "0
0 .—.,
to Z
,..6 . (V 'a mr k ( .... ....- a.)
3 a. . I teli- n °.-. * - 10 ).
0 -
r- 5 o c 1 :3 a
OP as cz F = 7t.. fit ....
g ,-;,. n m 6
C -*`b' - a _ ,-.-- g g
"la CO
1-.
(71
ns n cri
- T C2 , i
a' a E a :.:,..
< (13. ` ;4. m a-- :::::,..!:
co
Fi. ..,-. tilk. R CI a :,.:
.o ie 2
r.« m r e n —
• LI 5,11-4, 6...,-
.7. a ,. , P E. .:
4 , A , ,,, ,,.. < ...„ - u., =• m .17,. fl .*. `13 S' IN CL .4.,... A) q . u.,
q 0 ti., % 5. g: a'• . .
r- --
3" (a. 3 ni c ,a --`
r -
v' so 1 ::::::,,,,,,.. FT; - - T a - .9: g " 2 -c) n ,-- to a • N a ..
Pr .e ,T 3
7, 3 #
5. lb 1. ` P CU " - ." - -_ , :ti 5 eL at. 1 3,..Q..a@dirgq-.- •
.t...: $ 3
co 2 0- „, z. 1 a ...• . . 2. hg
. 01 , IA III vt a _
c -4. v
° Rol: rI gg0 6 1_ L., 5 a n o w -6 . . : .1 S' 2 ri.
...
(- > - - ffi 8 w 0 :., w, CD .
> c D.
n''' CL —c C m r . 0 C
a. g a. cw 4:.,,,,, ..- — ..< 0: 041:1 '" fl f"4 C - - = Z
t . ; m DJ ,'::-..f.1;.:1 11)
F in
=- a - .. c3 ri ,„ .5 -.,z 0 .4,, c R, •
.. - 4 -,-, 1 1-7 t,' 1 „ ,01, fl, lii: 'iii::::•1441 3 L -4 / P4 ' ill g gi. ai 3 9, a; gi
I t - No -LF 0 , L 0 .. Ct. .... KA : i: : :,,e& r• 5 ru 0 1 t .i j cr 2 2 a cL a c - ?.. te
1 iih. e .,......` M 0 Q f": 1 . N 0 Ai ''' ba T ..,7 g. z R o E .,- ;'• 51 , tf, E,
- =r; 3 :L.:. .., • CD ... 5 = - go ....... .....
1U
. 0
' 1
V c 5 3. . , , et , , r ot s • a 9-, 0. m•--c ,- 2 :II 2 co
,11 — .
0 ,.....„
2 -P1:=.; • : Fli. . 03* E g , ni '5' a,. o
,... ,
2 , - a 5. i a r,-,. ',.z.t, 2, .. a ., r ri 47 as = -.-. a et a,
4/1 n
a z "!.. •z
4.1.1 •••••
a -00
M DJ
ci.
417.-
VI "T
f " CA -121,-:+2'7:: & E 5
aii-:. 3 •" 132.
hi
--_- g
x ,...
7f: 14-77 fD •
ri si ..:• :::7f..41 ifi: e u -9
- 0 0
,
/
• =''R CM a � w TI ro a
..., z
Q ogo
Ct rob `" m
l 2- ; 9 a s
w. 2 =` i U
. g'. --' -- -e* 1 0,_,
gm 27 A CO
I r b 0 o w
rl - C O
su
g2 gji- a 4..... ,,,, ER, 3 $ 2, i g A :leo 1 z 0 n !•0
o
n — a
[ i 4 t11 na }I
2 8 . e,.. =,--w.la "2 Do i 0 5 =
�• ,� 3 - --rn in 2.m - = fq ? r e 3
,Iterafilliall Gi b � a' % i 2 § erf a a�
r. Z 5 U i' -- V.. 9 gal! c 'fIgn c l a
h J U
PI t talv, fwe 9.,l1
3 i c 5- 8 ' c 8- 0.-tsz
id a ` ""• _ :cL n' gig,—
f .9 p 0 n
Q • os•
i: c i
g t Lis.
S.
F 7
I a a.
A ,
IF if
1 42
3 2
1
I t
Resolution No. 631 8
Tentative Parcel Map 25643
Page 9
EXHIBIT B--- Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map No, 25643
Pta, Division
1. This approval will consolidate two (2) of the three (3) lots that
comprise the 2.56 -acre project site into Parcel A and Parcel B.
Parcel A will contain 24,720 square feet, or 0.5 acres, while Parcel
B will contain 87,480 square feet, or 2.0 acres. Parcels A and B
shall be consolidated as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map
Exhibit, dated July 23, 1999. Deviations or exceptions from said
parcel map shall not be permitted without the approval of the City
Planning Commission;
2. The Planning Commission shall retain jurisdiction to amend or add
conditions with a public notice and public hearing to assure
compatibility with the purpose and intent of Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance and to protect the public health, safety and General
Welfare.
3. This approval shall expire 24rnonths from the effective date of the
proposed amendments, SP- 914A, to the Lakewood/Firestone
Specific Plan 91-2.
4. If City approval is contingent on any changes to the plans as
submitted, the applicant shall submit thrive copies of revised plans,
incorporating all approved amendments, overlays, modifications,
etc. to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building
permits.
5. Final Parcel Map No. 25643 shall be accepted by the City Council
and recorded with the County Recorder's Office before building
permits are issued.
6. All conditions of Tentative Parcel Map No. 25643 and Conditional
Use Permit No. 99 -29 shall be complied with before this application
becomes valid.
7. The mitigation measures recommended in the initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Holiday Inn Express and
Restaurant ", dated November 1, 1999 shall be implemented before
the approval for Parcel Map No. 25643 becomes valid.
8. The applicant/developer shall either show on the final recorded
parcel map the access easement across Parcel A for Parcel B,
Resolution No, 6318
Tentative Parcel Map 25643
Page 10
including reciprocal parking; or execute and record an agreement in fl
a form approved by the City Attorney of the City of Downey to
insure access and parking for Parcel B across Parcel A.
9. The applicant/developer shall provide any legally necessary
agreement that will provide access over Parcel A and Parcel B for
the neighboring parcel at 9060 Firestone Boulevard (Assessor
Parcel No. 6284- 008 -014) and the adjoining parcel at 9070
Firestone Boulevard (Assessor Parcel No. 6284 -008 -018).
Enain eerrina Divis
10. Standard width sidewalk and parkway trees shall be installed along
Firestone Boulevard. Said improvements shall be permanently
maintained to the standards of the Department of Public Works and
the City Engineering Division. Any damaged curb, gutter, sidewalk,
or drive approaches shall be replaced to City standards.
11. An engineered grading and drainage plan for the site (prepared by
a registered civil engineer) shall be submitted by the developers for
approval by the Engineering Division and Building & Safety
Division, and the property shall drain to Firestone Boulevard. f
12. The standards of improvement, construction materials, and methods of
construction shall be in conformance with the Standard Plans and
specifications for Public Works Construction and as modified by the City
of Downey's Standard Plans and Specifications.
Kplannloginisell/tptr26643ceres
I