HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 4668 RESOLUTION NO. 4668
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DOWNEY ENTERING INTO AGREEMENT WITH
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD
HARMLESS THE CITY OF DOWNEY IN REGARDS TO THE
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 85 -1 AND SPECIFIC PLAN 85 -1
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings.
1. That applications for a General Plan Amendment (GP 85 -1), from
Public to Light Industrial, and a Specific Plan (SP 85 -1) were submitted to
the City of Downey by the County of Los Angeles to allow development of
Parcel A of Rancho Los Amigos with office, business, and light industrial
uses. Attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference, is
an area map depicting the location of Parcel A.
2. That the City of Downey conducted an Initial Study of
Environmental Impact and has determined that a Negative Declaration can be
approved in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act for
General Plan Amendment 85 -1 and Specific Plan 85 -1.
3. As a condition to approval of the above mentioned Negative
Declaration, General Plan Amendment, and Specific Plan, the City requires and
the County agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, together with its
officers and employees from any cost, loss, damage or expense from any
litigation based on any alleged failure of the City to comply with the
California Environmental Quality Act as described in the attached Agreement
which is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit B.
Section 2. Based on the findings stated above, the City Council
authorizes the Mayor to sign said Agreement with the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 26th day of November , 1985.
Mayor
ATTEST:
/1
C ty C er - --
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Downey
City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of
November , 1985, by the following vote:
AYES: 5 Council Members: Santangelo, Boggs, Cormack, Barb, Davila
NOES: 0 Council Members:
ABSENT 0 Council Members
City Cler
•
.
Exhibit A
•
•
•
0 •
. . i .
47
• 1.2J q 2 x a bll 1 ' U2 3 r.
R
t O
o
el I
I
r * _ �
t
• • • ` � �• y
• t 4 v . ���►
.. T ST • .7 , .
4t. 4 , •. •
•
�, .7
• ' „� 1
G • 4 , , c y •
k.c ` .1
Q' 0,
9 S J
( o
v
• OQ .
s.
. r
•
•
.
Nov 22,8 12 : U 1 BURKE, r LIAMS & SORENSEN{ LA, CA (`.:' Ext 52?}
NOV. 22 'es 11:16 MCDONOUGH SACRAMEt4TO CA P•a
exhibit B
112285
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of
November, 1985, by and between the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
( "County "), a public body corporate and politic organized
pursuant to Title 3 of the California Government Code
(Sections 23000 et Eta.), and the City of Downey ( "City"),
a municipal corporation, with respect to the following
facts and circumstances:
A. In connection with Specific Plan Application
No. SS -1, the City anticipates the approval of an ordinance
(the 'Ordinance) adopting a specific plan for certain real
property owned by the County in the City of Downey, known
as Rancho Los Amigos Parcel A.
B. In connection with the adoption of said
Ordinance, the City also contemplates adoption of a
resolution approving an amendment to the General Plan of
the City of Downey (General Plan Amendment No. 85.1).
C. Pursuant to the applicable provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA'), the City
contemplates approval, by resolution, of a negative
declaration finding and determining that the approval of
the aforementioned Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment
will not have a significant effect on the environment.
D. As a condition to adoption of the two resolutions
and the Ordinance mentioned above, the City requires that
the County agree to indemnify and hold harmless the City,
together with its officers and employees, from any coat,
lose, damage or expense from any litigation based on any •
alleged failure of the City to comply with CEQA in
connection with the adoption of said Ordinance and said
resolutions.
•
Nov 2 2 , 85 12:U2 BURKE 1ILLIAMS & SORENSEN{ LA,CA c _ . . 2 ) F;23 -1'9UU Ext 5:29 } F. U4
NOV,22 'e5 11;17 MCDONOUGH SACRAMENTO CA P.03
NOW THEREFORE, the City and the County hereby agree as
follows:
1. The County shall indemnify and hold harmless the
city, together with its officers and employees, of and from
any costs, lose, expenses or damages arising from any
action or proceeding ('Action') to attack, review, set
aside, void or annul the ordinance, or either or both of
the resolutions referred to above, on the basis that the
City has improperly determined that the aforementioned acts
will not have a significant effect on the environment, or
that the City has otherwise failed to comply with the
provisions of CEQA in Connection with the approval of the
Ordinance and said resolutions.
2. The City hereby irrevocably appoints the County
• its attorney -in -fact for the defense of any such Action and
authorizes the County, subject to the prior consultation
and review of the City Attorney, to take any actions it
deems necessary on behalf of the City to prosecute, defend,
settle or otherwise dispose of such Action, with or without
the further consent of the City, including but not limited
to the following:
1. Answer any complaint, including the
admission or denial of any facts contained
therein/
2. Assert or waive any defense;
3. Make or respond to any motion;
4. Conduct or respond to any discovery/ •
5. Negotiate and approve the terms and
conditions of any settlement; or
6. Actively defend or abandon the defense of
such Action.
In this connection, the City agrees to cause the
appropriate officers of the City to duly and timely execute
any documents, including without limitation, any pleading*,
briefs, notices, motions, verifications, or other papers or
i Ek L 7i'D ; II _
Nov 22, 8c+ 1'2:02 BURKE, iLLIAt1S SOREi35 t1 L�,CA ( "..'12 ) 6'.'2- 1'?UU E:.t 53 #
NOV.22 X95 11:19 MCDONOUGH SACRAMENTO CA Pe&
I.i
documents which the County may request in the conduct of
such Action. The obligation of the County to consult with
and provide documents for the review of the City Attorney
does not imply any right of the City or the City Attorney
4
to" approve any document or other action taken with respect
to ouch Action.
3. If the City unreasonably fails or refuses to duly
and timely execute any document as aforesaid or
unreasonably interferes in any way with the conduct of such
Action, this Agreement may be terminated by the County and .
thereafter, this Agreement shall be of no further force or
effect between the parties. The County shall give the City
not less than three (3) days prior written notice of its
intent to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
paragraph 3, specifying the manner in which the City has
unreasonably failed or refused to execute any document or
otherwise unreasonably interfered with the conduct of such
Action. During said three (3) day period, the City may
cure such failure or refusal or other action, and if cured
within said three (3) day period, this Agreement shall not
be so terminated. If, during said three (3) day period,
the City shall notify the County in writing that it
disputes the basis of such termination as set forth in the
county's notice to the City, then such dispute shall be
submitted to a retired Los Angeles County Superior Court
Judge (to be agreed upon by the parties) for determination
within ten (10) days or as soon as practicable.
Both the City and the County agree to pursue in
good faith the earliest possible resolution of any such
dispute. The costs of such dispute resolution pcoceedi,nge,
plus any costs of defense of the Action incurred after the
effective date of any termination shall be borne by'the
.
losing party.
•
I 1H
j +
i �� •
._ ; • P
_3_
J.
1 i
•thf
• r
a
WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed by their respective agents � �osA
duly authorized. t�. p � r ,,M,T,•(4,�
thereunto ,� ,1�p \c
+ qt ' ',��
APPROVED: ,`.'•;
DeSIITT W. CLINTON, 4 ;- ''J j t i
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ': •' '` ' ' :;
County Counsel M ;- > ,_ ....';
• C FORN� .,..e„..--- ,....- . c.. r .: . . — 4-7,4.014.
By: / By: _
1 Deputy
APPROVED: CITY OF DOWNEY
£14 B y : By: 4/
C ty • ttorney . OF L'Os
�� r' �
ATTEST: LARRY J. MONTEILH + C ti ` t� ', .
, t
CLERK T!- BOA OF SU�' VISORS ,• "': _�.11,t
r ' eputy C "iLIFORM"
I hereby certify that pursuant to ADOPTED
Section 2.5103 of the Government Code,
delivery of this document has been made. BOARD OF SUP; ;;VISORS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
-- LARRY J. MO *�ITI��YI.•SI .
Executive Officer g '7 NOV 2 G 1985
Clerk o the Board of S A • ervisors
'.' l % t f
By' LA'S_ --- _ _
DEPUTY LARRY J. MONTEILH
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
s
CA kN . ,.*.1 . 1 . 0...
cst e
. ,
i kow s„i
(t4QLO
-4- *
N �oS Project), .
1 ,
r •
l
c •;;
. .
' j
'' `
i