HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 54446/4/91
RESOLUTION NO. 5444
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DOWNEY CERTIFYING THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR DOWNEY
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AMENDMENT AREA 5C
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Downey
hereby finds, determines and declares that:
A. The Downey Community Development Commission
proposes to approve Amendment No. 5C to the Downey
Redevelopment Project Area which encompasses 15.4
acres generally located northwest, southwest and
southeast of the intersection of Lakewood Boulevard
and Gallatin Road ( "Project ").
B. An Environmental Impact Report ( "EIR ") has
been prepared to address the environmental effects,
mitigation measures, and project alternatives
associated with the proposed project.
C. The EIR was prepared to the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
and the State and City CEQA Guidelines
( "Guidelines ") and was circulated for public review
in accordance with CEQA and State and City CEQA
Guidelines.
D. Written and oral comments on the EIR were
received from the public and responsible agencies
during and after the review period.
E. The Planning Commission conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the project and the EIR
on April 17, 1991 and the City Council and the
Community Development Commission conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on June 11, 1991 at which
times all public testimony with respect to the
project and EIR was received.
F. Such documents and testimony were responded to
through a Response to Comments document and various
staff reports submitted to the Council and
pmt /RES478194
6/4/91
Community Development Commission AS required by
CEQA.
G. The Community Development Commission and City
Council have reviewed all environmental
documentation comprising the EIR and has found that
the EIR considered all environmental effects of the
proposed project and is complete and adequate and
fully complies with all requirements of CEQA and
the Guidelines.
H. Section 21081 of CEQA and Section 15091 of the
CEQA Guidelines require that the Community
Development Commission and City Council make one or
more of the following findings prior to approval of
a project for which an EIR has been completed,
identifying one or more significant effects of the
project, along with a statement of facts supporting
each finding:
FINDING 1 - Changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into the project which
mitigate or avoid the significant environmental
effects thereof as identified in the EIR.
FINDING 2 - Such changes or alterations are within
the responsibility and jurisdiction of another
public agency and not the agency making the
finding. Such findings have been adopted by other
such agency or can and should be adopted by such
other agency.
FINDING 3 - Specific economic, social, or other
considerations make infeasible the mitigation
measures or other project alternatives identified
in the EIR.
I. Section 15093(a) of the Guidelines requires
the Community Development Commission and City
Council to balance the benefits of a proposed
project against its unavoidable environmental risks
in determining whether to approve the project.
J. Section 15093(b) requires, where the decision
of the Community Development Commission and City
Council allows the occurrence of significant
effects which are identified in the EIR but are not
mitigated, the Community Development Commission and
City Council must state in writing the reasons to
-2-
pmt /RES478194
6/4/91
support its action, based on the EIR or other
information in the record.
K. The Community Development Commission and City
Council have reviewed and considered all of the
environmental documentation prepared to evaluate
the proposed project, including all elements of the
EIR.
L. The Community Development Commission and City
Council contemplate and direct continuing
compliance with CEQA and the Guidelines as
necessary in the implementation of the phases and
elements of the project.
M. The Community Development Commission and City
Council by this Resolution adopt the Statement of
Facts and Statement of Overriding Considerations as
required by Section 15092 and 15093 of the
Guidelines.
SECTION a. The City Council makes the findings
contained in the Statement of Facts with respect to
significant effects identified in the Final EIR and finds
that each fact in support of the findings is true and is
based upon substantial evidence in the record including the
Final EIR. The Statement of Facts is attached hereto as
Attachment A and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 2. The City Council finds that the facts
set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations are
true and are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including the Final EIR. The Statement of
Overriding Consideration is attached hereto as Attachment B
-- and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION g. The City Council finds that the Final
EIR has identified all significant environmental effects of
the project and that there are no known potential
environmental effects not addressed in the Final EIR.
SECTION A. The City Council finds that all
significant effects of the project are set forth in the
Statement of Facts and the Final EIR.
SECTION A. The City Council finds that although
the Final EIR identifies certain significant environmental
effects that will result if the project is approved, all
significant effects that can be feasibly mitigated or
avoided have been reduced to an acceptable level by the
-3-
imposition of mitigation measures on the approved project.
All mitigation measures shall be incorporated into
conditions of approval.
SECTION 7. The City Council finds that potential
mitigation measures or project alternatives not incorporated
in the project (including the "No Project" alternative) were
rejected as infeasible, based upon specific economic,
social, or other considerations as set forth in the
Statement of Facts and the Final EIR. A summary of
mitigation measures is attached hereto as Attachment C and
incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION $. The City Council finds that the
unavoidable significant impacts of the project, as
identified in the Statement of Facts, that have not been
reduced to a level of insignificance have been substantially
reduced in their impacts by the imposition of mitigation
measures which shall be incorporated into conditions of
approval. The City Council finds that the remaining
unavoidable significant impacts are clearly outweighed by
the economic, social, or other benefits of the project, as
set forth in the Statement of Overriding Consideration.
SECTION 2. The City Council finds that the Final
EIR has described all reasonable alternatives the project
that could feasibly obtain the basic objectives of the
project (including the "No Project" alternative), even when
these alternatives might impede the attainment of project
objectives and might be more costly. Further, the City
Council finds that a good faith effort was made to
incorporate alternatives in the preparation of the Draft EIR
and all reasonable alternatives were considered in the
review process of the Final EIR and ultimate decisions on
the project.
SECTION LQ. In accordance with the requirements of
Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, a Mitigation
Monitoring Plan has been developed for the project in
accordance with said section which is attached hereto as
Attachment C and incorporated herein by this reference as
though set forth in full. Said Mitigation Monitoring Plan
is hereby approved and adopted and imposed upon the Project
as condition.
SECTION 11. Based upon the foregoing findings and
determinations the City Council hereby certifies that the
Final EIR is complete and adequate in that it addresses all
environmental effects of the proposed project and fully
complies with all requirements of the California
pmt /RES478194
6/4/91
-4-
Environmental Quality Act and the State and City CEQA
Guidelines and was presented to the Council which reviewed
and considered the information contained therein prior to
consideration and approval of the Project.
SECTION 12. The City Manager is hereby authorized
and directed to execute and file a Notice of Determination
as required pursuant to CEQA.
SECTION 12. The City Clerk shall certify the
adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of
June , 19 91
ATTEST:
i JUDITH E. McDONNELL
CITY CLERK
pmt /RES478194
6/4/91
-5-
ROY L. PAUL
MAYOR
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy
of a Resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of
Downey at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 11th day of
June , 19 91, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Boggs, Hayden, Cormack, Paul
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAINED: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Brazelton
pmt /RES478194
6/4/91
-6-
(14teita imax_eze,
/ JUDITH E. McDONNELL
C"LTY CLERK
CEOA STATEMENT OF FINDINGS AND FACTS
DOWNEy COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CrMM75SION
AMENDMENT NO. 5C TO THE DOWNEY R ' DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF THE
PROPOSED PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED, FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO SAID
EFFECTS, AND STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, ALL WITH
RESPECT TO THE CERTIFICATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
THE ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT NO. 5C TO THE DOWNEY REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA, DOWNEY, CALIFORNIA.
BACKGROUND
ATTACHMENT A
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA
Guidelines (Guidelines) promulgated thereto provide:
"No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which
an EIR has been completed which identifies one or more significant
environmental effects of the project unless the public agency-makes
one or more written findings for each of those significant effects
accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each
finding.
The possible findings are:
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant effect as identified
by the EIR.
2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility
and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the
agency making the finding. Such changes have been
adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted
by such other agency.
3. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make
infeasible the mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the Final EIR (Section 15091
of the Guidelines."
The Downey Community Development Commission is considering approval
of Amendment No. 5 to the existing Downey Redevelopment Project
Area. Because the proposed action constitutes a project under the
CEQA Guidelines, the Downey Community Development Commission has
prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The EIR has
identified certain significant effects which may occur as a result
of the project, or on a cumulative basis in conjunction with other
past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future projects. Further,
the Community Development Commission desires to approve this
project and, after determining that the EIR is complete and has
been prepared in accordance with CEQA and the Guidelines, the
findings set forth herein are made:
FINDINGS OF FACT IN SUPPORT OP FINDINGS FOR
SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT
EFFECTS DETERMINED TO BE IN$I NIFICANT
INITIAL STUDY
The City of Downey Community Development Department prepared an
Initial Study to identify effects of the proposed project which are
not potentially significant. Those topics which were determined
not to be significant are stated below:
Earth
A. There is no indication of unstable earth conditions in the
project vicinity. The project will not result in changes to
geologic substructures.
B. No significant disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil will occur with project
implementation.
C. The site is relatively flat and implementation of the project
will not result in any significant change in topography.
D. The project will not result in the destruction or modification
of any unique geologic or physical feature.
F. The project will not result in any changes in deposition or
erosion of beach sand or the modification of any river or
stream channel.
Air
B. Implementation of the project will not result in the creation
of objectional odors.
C. The project will not cause any alteration of air movement,
either locally or regionally.
Water
A. No changes in currents or the course or direction of water
movements will be caused by the project.
B. No significant changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff will occur.
C. Project implementation will not result in the alteration to
the course or flow of flood waters.
6
D. The project will not cause a change in the amount of water in
any surface water body.
Implementation of the project will not cause the discharge of
any pollutants which will affect the surface water quality of
any water body.
The project will have no effect on the rate or direction of
flow of any ground water sources.
G. The project will not result in the addition or removal of
water from any ground water source. Therefore, it will not
cause any impact to the quantity or quality of any ground
water.
E .
F.
H. Implementation of the project will not result in the
substantial reduction in the amount of water available for
public water supplies.
Plant Ling
A. The project will not result in the change in diversity of
species, or the number of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants).
8. The project will not result in the reduction in the numbers
of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants.
C. The project will not result in the introduction of new species
of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species.
D. The project will not result in the reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop.
Animal Life
A. The project will not result in the change in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land
animals, including reptiles, fish, and shellfish, benthic
organisms, or insects).
B. The project will not result in the reduction in the numbers
of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals.
C. The project will not result in the introduction of new species
of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals.
D. The project will not result in the deterioration to existing
fish or wildlife habitat.
Natural Resources
A. The project will not result in the increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources.
Risk of Upset
A. Project implementation will not result in the risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances in the event
of an accident or upset conditions.
B. The project will not result in the possible interference with —
an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan.
Population
A. The proposal will not alter the locations, distribution,
density, or growth rate of the human population of the area.
Housing
A. Project implementation will not affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing.
Transportation /Circulation
D. Project implementation will not significantly alter the
present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or
goods.
E. Project implementation will not alter waterborne, rail or air
traffic.
Public Services
C. Schools will not be impacted by the implementation of the
proposed redevelopment project.
D. Parka and recreational facilities will not be impacted by the
implementation of the proposed redevelopment project.
F. No other governmental services or facilities will be adversely
impacted by the implementation of the proposed redevelopment
project.
Enerav
A. The project will not result in any significant increase in the
amount of fuel or energy used in the project environs.
than Health
A. Implementation of the project will not result in the creation
of any public health hazard in the vicinity.
8
B. Project implementation will not result in the exposure of
people to potential health hazards.
Aesthetics
A. The project will replace existing urban uses with an urban
institutional use. No significant impact to the aesthetics
of the area will result.
Cultural Resources
A. There is no documentation available which would suggest that
project implementation will result in the alteration of or the
destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site.
B. Previous development of the site has resulted in the
destruction of any previously existing resource. No project -
related physical or aesthetic impacts are anticipated with
project implementation.
C. Project implementation will not result in the physical change
to any unique ethnic cultural value(s).
D. No known religious or sacred uses exist within the subject
property and project environs. No project - related impacts are
anticipated.
EFFECTS DETERMINED TO BE MITIGABLE TO A LEVEL OF INSIGNIFICANCE
SOILS AND GEOLOGY
$ianificant Effect
Structures will be subject to potential groundahaking from seismic
activity on existing regional faults /fault systems. These impacts
will be similar to those which occur throughout the seismically
active southern California region. No severe geologic or soil -
related hazards or constraints exist which are considered to be
potentially significant.
Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support of Findings
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
1. Conformance to the intent of the City of Downey General Plan
including but not limited to the Environmental Resource
Management Element and the Seismic Safety Element.
2. Conformance of building design within the Redevelopment Area
to the latest Uniform Building Code, the Downey Building Code
and recommendations of the Structural Engineers Association
of California.
3. Demonstration of compliance with specific requirements
established by local ordinance to ensure public safety and to
prevent undesirable practices will be met prior to issuance
of grading permits for projects within the Redevelopment Area.
4. Any on -site alluvial and infill soils not approved or placed
under engineering control should be removed and replaced with
compacted fill in areas planned to support structures.
CLIMATE AND AIR QUALITY
Sianificant gffect
Minor short -term impacts associated with construction activities
will occur. In 1995, mobile source, project related daily
emissions are estimated to be 2,404 pounds of CO; 178 pounds of
ROG; and 250 pounds of NOx. Finally microscale impacts will occur
but they are not anticipated to be significant when compared to the
20 ppm standard.
Findinas
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR.
Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and
jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the
finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or
can and should be adopted by such other agency.
Facts in Support of Pindinas
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
1. Because almost all of the project - related air quality impacts
derive from vehicular sources beyond the control of project
sponsors or local regulatory agencies, there is little
potential for substantial impact mitigation. Certain
mandatory measures such as dust control during construction
to prevent a dust nuisance and compliance with energy
conservation standards in Title 24 of the California
10
Administrative Code will be implemented, but they do not
address the basic transportation - related air quality impacts.
2. Any significant emissions reduction must come from reducing
trips. The AQMP contains a number of transportation control
measures (TCMs) which should, therefore, be considered for
inclusion where possible in project planning. These measures,
not all of which can be fully implemented in a commercial
traffic environment include:
o Improved public transit
o Area -wide carpool program
o On- street parking controls
o park and ride lots
o Incentives for carpools, transit, bicycles and walking
o Bicycle lanes and safe storage
o Staggered work hours
o Traffic flow improvements
3. In order for these measures to be effective, they need to be
organized on an area -wide basis. Individual employers with
more than 100 employees will be required to submit a trip
reduction plan under the requirements of Regulation BV.
However, many of the uses within the Amended Project Area may
have fewer than 100 employees. With some centralized
management, perhaps a number of smaller employee groups could
be integrated into a larger pool where implementation of the
above TCMa might be more effective. It is, therefore, strongly
recommended that adoption of the redevelopment plan for the
Amended Project Area include a concrete commitment to trip
reduction as a means of partially mitigating the impact of
project- related transportation air emissions.
DRAINAGE AND HYDROLOGY
Sianificant Effect
Redevelopment of the Amended Project Area will not significantly
impact ground water supplies or groundwater recharge capabilities.
Present flood control and surface drainage systems are considered
inadequate to serve the future redevelopment of the Amended Project
Area.
Findinas
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR.
Facts jn Support of Findinas
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
11
1.
Conformance to the intent of the City of Downey General Plan
including but not limited to the Environmental Resource
Management Element.
2. Conformance of building design within the project site to the
latest Uniform Building Code, the Downey Building Code and
recommendations of the Structural Engineers Association of
California.
3. A written assessment shall be prepared by a qualified
hydrologist or engineer for all new development or
redevelopment in areas subject to 100 -year flood plains. The
assessment shall be required to determine whether the
evelopment will significantly increase flood hazards and to
how that all new structures will be adequately protected.
Design specifications will be coordinated with the City of
Downey, Department of Community Development, Division of
Building and Safety and Engineering Division.
4. All new development and redevelopment approvals shall require
conformance where possible with the prohibitions of the Los
Angeles Water Quality Control Board and through the City's
resource management procedures to assure that water quality
and its supporting processes are taken into account in any
future project approvals.
5. Storm drain requirements within the redevelopment project area
shall be consistent with the City master plans of storm
drainage and requirements for storm drain facilities within
new developments. The design specifications shall be
coordinated with the City Department of Public Works and any
upgrading of existing facilities reviewed and undertaken
within these guidelines. Any required upgrading of storm
drain facilities should be undertaken within public right -of-
way as feasible.
6. Review of storm drain adequacy and project specific
requirements shall be required as part of individual project
approvals within the redevelopment area.
7. To alleviate erosion impacts, all projects approved within the
Redevelopment Area shall comply with applicable
recommendations from the Uniform Building Code and 1989 Air
Quality Management Plan (AQMP) pertaining to erosion control
and shall be required to employ the City's mandated erosion
control methods.
8. To mitigate wind erosion during
all exposed graded areas should
dust.
9. Scheduling of grading phases to
possible in order to provide
possible.
12
construction and development,
be kept sprinkled to minimize
begin as close to April 15 as
the longest dry season as
10. The grading plan shall include sufficient provisions for
erosion control during the raining season, considered to be
October 15 to April 15 of each year. This shall prevent
sedimentation of the existing flood control channel and public
streets.
All grading operations conducted on a "staged" basis to expose
only those areas necessary at each phase and only in areas
where construction is to be undertaken.
12. Immediate planting of sufficient vegetation to cover any
grading, cut and fill, or scars on which structures or
improvements are not to be constructed.
13. vegetation incorporated to maintain the stabilization of soils
shall be coordinated with drought resistant plants.
1 1.
NOISE /LIGHT AND GLARE
Significant Effect
Temporary noise impacts associated with demolition, grading and
construction will occur. Noise levels may reach 90 dB(A) or
greater. The zone of commercial incompatibility along roadways in
the vicinity of the Amended Project Area would increase by only six
feet as a result of the proposed project. Typical redevelopment
traffic noise will increase by 0.4 to 0.6 dB. The maximum project -
related noise increase is estimated to be 0.7 dB.
Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Sunnort of Fj,ndinas
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
1. Construction permits approved for projects within the Amended
Project Area should limit construction activities to those
hours stipulated in the Downey Noise Ordinance (Municipal Code
Section 4606). Those same permits should also specify
construction access routing to minimize construction truck
traffic past any existing residential or other noise sensitive
uses in the vicinity of the Amended Project Area.
2. Acoustical analyses shall be required for all future
development /redevelopment proposed within the Amended Project
Area.
13
LAND USE /RELEVANT PLANNING
5ianificant
The proposed redevelopment project is consistent with the existing
land uses in the vicinity of the Amended Project Area. Further,
land uses contemplated by the City are consistent with existing
General Plan designations and zoning classifications for the
Amended Project Area anticipated. Redevelopment activities which
may occur within the Amended Project Area could result in the
intensification of existing land uses and the displacement of
businesses and /or property owners through property acquisition.
Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR.
Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and
jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the
finding. Such changes have . been adopted by such other agency or
can and should be adopted by such other agency.
Facts in SuDoort of Findings
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
1. The City shall process all future development plans within the
proposed project area in the manner provided by applicable
City regulations, as well as the limits, restrictions and
controls established by the Community Development Commission
of the City of Downey in accordance with the adopted
redevelopment plan.
2. To protect residential areas which surround the proposed
project area, the use of the P -8 Parking Buffer zone shall be
retained to ensure the continued separation between commercial
and residential uses.
3. Developers within the proposed project area shall be required
to prevent parking spillover into adjoining residential
neighborhoods bys (1) providing adequate parking to serve the
proposed development, (2) providing alternatives which reduce
transportation demand (ridesharing or transit) to serve the
projected commuting flow associated with the project, or both.
Future developers within the proposed project area shall be
required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air
Quality Management District (AQMD) Regulation XV with regard
to reducing vehicle trips and, consequently, parking demand
in the project area. Compliance with these measures shall be
monitored during the project review and approval process.
14
4. Adequate relocation assistance shall be provided to all
businesses affected by the implementation of the proposed
Redevelopment Plan for Amended Project Area 5C. This
assistance shall be stipulated in the Relocation Plan and
program adopted by the City of Downey.
TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION
Significant Effect
Future redevelopment will result in the generation of 13,360
average daily vehicle trips, an increase in volumes on the existing
roadway system from less than one percent to over 15 percent. Four
intersections will be negatively impacted by ultimate development
of the proposed project, including: Lakewood Boulevard /Gallatin
Road; Lakewood Boulevard /Florence Avenue; Lakewood Boulevard /I -5
SB Ramp; and Gallatin Road /Brookshire Avenue.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR.
Findings in Sunoort f the Fact
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
1. Prepare and implement a Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
program, where feasible, in conjunction with the project
development to reduce the level of project- generated traffic
during the peak periods. This program could include the
following elements: (a) staggered work schedules, (b) ride
sharing program, (c) priority parking for carpools /vanpools,
(d) transit service enhancements, and (e) the provision of
bicycle storage facilities and lockers.
2. Provide an additional westbound to southbound left -turn lane
at the Lakewood Boulevard /Telegraph Road intersection. This
will result in the improvement of intersection operations from
LOS E to C in the morning and LOS F to E in the afternoon peak
periods. The Development Commission and /or project applicant
will be required to pay for roadway improvements.
3. Widen the Gallatin Road approaches at its intersection with
Lakewood Boulevard to provide a left -turn lane and two through
lanes in both the eastbound and westbound directions. Widen
the Lakewood Boulevard approaches at that intersection to
provide a left -turn lane and three through lanes in both the
northbound and southbound directions. This will result in the
improvement of intersection operations from LOS D to C in the
15
morning and LOS F to C in the afternoon peak periods. The
Community Development Commission and /or project applicant will
be required to pay for roadway improvements.
4. Widen the Lakewood Boulevard approaches at its intersection
with Florence Avenue to provide an exclusive right -turn lane,
three through lanes, and a left -turn lane in the northbound
and southbound directions. This will result in the
improvement of intersection operations from LOS E to D in the
afternoon per period. The LOS will remain at D during the
morning; however, the ICU will improve. The Community
Development Commission and /or project applicant will be
required to pay for roadway improvements.
5. Signal warrant analyses for the intersection of Gallatin
Road /Brookshire Avenue on a project -by- project basis. A
signal shall be constructed at such time as signal warrants
determine it necessary. The Community Development Commission
and /or project applicant will be required to pay for
signalization of this intersection, if determined necessary.
6. Landscape plantings and signs shall be designed to assure good
visibility for motorists at all site access driveways and
internal roadway intersections.
7. Provide adequate parking on -site in conformance with City of
Downey zoning Code to accommodate the proposed land uses.
8. Construct sidewalks along all streets and pedestrian walkways
between all buildings and parking areas to accommodate
pedestrian movements.
9. Provide bus stop shelters at each bus stop of Lakewood
Boulevard along the project frontage as part of its bus
shelter program.
PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY
Significant Effect
Future redevelopment could be affected by undetected hazards
associated with prior activities and hazards related to improper
handling and storing of hazardous materials. It is unlikely that
groundwater would be adversely affected by implementation of the
proposed project. It is not anticipated that emergency responses
or emergency evacuation plans will be significantly affected by the
proposed project.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR.
16
Findings in Su000rt of the Fact
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
1.
The removal of any underground storage tanks identified on the
proposed project site within the Redevelopment Area as
required by California State law. Although there is no
analytical evidence to suggest leaking tanks are present on
any of the proposed sites, state requirements would require
further testing at the time of removal of any tanks identified
on a site.
2. Monitoring of groundwater during mitigation of any
contaminated soils for contamination resulting from mitigation
activities or existing, localized unidentified groundwater
contamination.
3. If site assessment indicates that remediation will be
required, a remediation plan for the site shall be developed
based on applicable soils investigations and available
technologies. The plan shall identify the location and method
of remediation of sites with any soils identified as being
contaminated. The removal and disposition and /or other
remediation of these materials will be verified by a
registered geologist.
4. Remediation of the contaminated soils on the site shall be
coordinated with the California Department of Health Services
which must approve the remediation technology utilized and
establish appropriate clean -up levels. Remediation operations
shall be coordinated, as necessary, with other regulatory
agencies such as Air Quality Management District, Regional
Water Quality Control Board, etc. depending upon the
remediation technologies selected.
5. The Downey Fire Department will be provided with verification
that all contaminated materials, subsequently identified as
being hazardous, will be disposed of in an approved landfill
or remediated in an approved manner.
6. Any contaminated materials encountered during grading
operations shall also undergo remedial operations in
compliance with standards and guidelines established by an
approved remediation plan.
7. Compliance with the policies and related City Codes which
establish a system to monitor and regulate the handling,
transport, and disposal of contaminated soils and hazardous
materials.
8. All recommendations proposed in the air quality section of
this document relative to watering the site during the removal
of soils from the site and other grading operations shall be
17
adhered to maximize the potential reduction of creating
fugitive dust off -site.
9. As feasible site design remediation programs shall include
site arrangements which allow through movement of prevailing
winds and circulation of air at the site and abundant
landscaping, which tends to shield and filter the air at the
site. Setbacks and buffer areas shall be included in site
design to separate activity areas from industrial activities,
roadways and parking areas to allow the dispersion of
relatively concentrated contaminants near the source of
emission.
10. The Downey Fire Department shall be designated as the lead
agency for monitoring construction hazards associated with
hazardous materials. The developer for individual projects
will coordinate efforts with the Department to ensure that no
hazards are associated with proposed construction activity.
11. Design guideline for projects approved within the
Redevelopment Area shall include provisions that any hazardous
materials or wastes that may contaminate ground and surface
waters shall be stored in areas that have an impervious floor
and impervious sidewalls with sufficient capacity to contain
a maximum spill. If they are stored out -of -doors the
containment shall include capacity for the wastes and
rainwater.
12. Underground fuel storage tanks and piping at service stations
shall comply with California underground storage tank
regulations.
13. If specialized uses which may discharge large volumes of
potentially contaminated water into the local sewer system,
i.e., a carwash, review by the local sewer agency shall be
required and an assessment required for pretreatment of the
wash water to remove sediment, oil and grease before discharge
into the sanitary sewer.
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Fire Protection
$ ignificant Effect
Increased development may result in an increase in the demand for
fire protection services. However, the level of service would not
be degraded by implementation of the redevelopment plan.
pindinq
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR.
18
Findinas in Su000rt of the Fact
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
The Downey Community Development Commission will consult with
the Fire Department to review plans for projects within the
redevelopment area, determine the need for mitigation and
ensure that adequate on site and off site facilities are
available to support for individual development projects.
2. Design standards shall be consistent with accepted fire safety
considerations. Existing fire safety regulations (access,
hydrants, sprinklers, etc.) shall be enforced through
established City of Downey project review and permitting
procedures.
3. Specific fire safety design criteria shall be applied
consistently within the Amended Project Area to ensure that
adequate circulation and emergency access is provided; for
example, by providing adequate ingress and egress to proposed
development and requiring street widths and fire access in
accordance with City standards.
4. Provisions for the use and storage of any potentially
hazardous materials within the proposed plan area shall be
approved by the Fire Department and strict controls shall be
placed upon their use and storage to ensure safety. All laws
regarding storage and use shall be strictly enforced. An
emergency response plan and /or emergency evacuation plan shall
also be prepared and approved by the Fire Department.
5. A hazard and toxic materials plan which determines the method
of storing and disposing of such materials shall be submitted
to the Fire Department for their review and approval prior to
issuing tenant improvement permits.
1.
Police Protection
Significant Effect
Increased development within the Amended Project Area could result
in increased crime; however, redevelopment which addresses
deterioration and decay may result in a net improvement in the
crime rate of the area. Project implementation is not expected to
pose significant problems in providing law enforcement services.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR.
19
Findings in Supnort of the Fact
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
1.
The Community Development Commission will coordinate with the
Police Department on design guidelines for projects proposed
within the Redevelopment area. In order to ensure the
continuing provision of adequate law enforcement services as
the proposed Redevelopment Plan is implemented, the Police
Department will review plans for individual projects proposed
within the redevelopment area.
Water Facilities and Service
Significant Effect
Project implementation would result in the demand for up to 94,000
gallons per day over that consumed by the existing uses. No
adverse impacts to domestic water facilities are anticipated.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR.
Findings in Support of the Fact
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
1. Required on -site (i.e., within the fended Project Area)
domestic water connections shall be constructed to meet the
standards of the City Engineer and /or City of Downey Water
System, as appropriate, with easements granted to the City of
Downey as required to maintain on -site water facilities.
Adequate plans for on -site water facilities to serve future
development projects within the proposed redevelopment area
shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer and
shall be subject to the approval of the City of Downey. It
shall be the responsibility of the developer to extend and /or
construct new facilities required to serve future development
in the project area.
2. Required improvements to local water mains and other domestic
water facilities may also be constructed as needed by the
Community Development Commission of the City of Downey.
Implementation of the proposed project will provide a
potential source of funding to provide needed infrastructure
improvements in the proposed project area. Additional funding
20
Findina
arrangements, including issuance of bonds or other financial
instruments, developer reimbursements and assessment and
Community Facilities Districts may also be used.
3. Installation of water - saving devices shall be included in the
design and construction of future development projects within
the project area. These shall include, at a minimum:
o Low flush toilets
o Low flow showers and faucets
Insulation of hot water lines in water recirculating
systems.
4. Automatic systems shall be installed which restrict landscape
watering to early morning and evening hours, in order to
reduce evaporation.
5. Drought resistant vegetation shall be used for landscaping to
reduce water consumption from irrigation.
Sewer Facilities and Service
Sianificant Effect
Project implementation would result in the generation of
approximately up to 285,000 gallons per day of sewage over the
existing uses. However, no significant impacts are anticipated at
the regional treatment facilities. Local sewers serving the
Amended Project Area may be impacted, depending upon the
characteristics of future development projects.
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR.
Findinas in Support of the Fact
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
1. Required on -site and off -site sewers shall be constructed to
meet the standards of the City Engineer, in accordance with
the requirements of City of Downey Municipal Code Section
7224. Sewer easements may also be required. Adequate plans
for both on -site and off -site sewer improvements to serve the
project shall be prepared by a registered professional
engineer and shall be subject to the approval of the City of
Downey. Required connection fees shall be paid to the City
and to the County Sanitation Districts before a permit to
connect to the sewer system can be issued.
21
2. The County Sanitation Districts are empowered by the
California Health and Safety Code to charge a fee for the
privilege of connecting to the Sanitation Districts' Sewerage
System or for increasing the existing strength and /or quantity
of wastewater attributable to a particular parcel or operation
already connected. Required fees shall be the responsibility
of the future developers of the property located within the
redevelopment area.
3. Required improvements to local sewer lines may also be
constructed as needed by the Community Development Commission
of the City of Downey. Implementation of the proposed project
will provide a potential source of funding to provide needed
infrastructure improvements in the proposed project area.
Additional funding arrangements, including issuance of bonds
or other financial instruments, developer reimbursements and
assessment and Community Facilities Districts may also be
used.
4. Installation of water - saving devices, which also serve to
reduce wastewater generation, shall be included in future
project design and construction. These shall include, at a
minimums
Solid Waste
Significant Effgat
Project implementation will result in the generation of
approximately 15 tons /day more solid waste than is currently
generated within the Amended Project Area.
Findina
o Low flush toilets
o Low flow showers and faucets
o Insulation of hot water lines in water recirculating
systems.
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR.
Findinas in Support of the Fact
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
1. The Community Development Commission of the City of Downey
shall encourage future developers within the proposed project
area to examine the feasibility of implementing recycling
programs for office white paper, computer paper, glass, cans,
P.E.T plastic bottles, cardboard and other recyclable
22
materials. Refuse collection contracts for development
projects within the project area shall, to the extent
feasible, include provisions for the collection of
recyclables. Design of development projects within the
project area shall allow for siting of recycling facilities
within trash receptacle enclosures, in the event that such
programs are eventually implemented, and shall reserve space
to provide access for recycling vehicles.
2. Development projects within the proposed project area shall
comply with requirements established by the County in any
final Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan which may be
adopted by the County.
3. Landscaping of future development projects within the proposed
project area shall incorporate drought resistant plant
materials which have minimal maintenance requirements and
generate less yard waste for disposal at County landfills.
Storm Drain Facilities
Sianificant Effect
Project implementation will result in some impacts to the existing
inadequate storm drain system in the City. However, it would not
pose significant impacts to the County storm drainage facilities.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR.
gindinas in Succort of the Fact
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
1. Participation in the master plan of drainage. Participation
shall be determined by the City Engineer and may include the
construction of master plan facilities, dedication of right -
of-way and /or payment of drainage fees.
2. Construction of storm drainage facilities in conformance with
applicable City of Downey codes and standards. An engineering
hydrology study will be required to determine the quantity of
storm water runoff from development sites located in the
proposed redevelopment area. A drainage plan will be
developed for proposed development sites which will identify
the on -site and other localized storm drain improvements
required to direct storm flows to local storm drains and
regional flood control systems. The necessary improvements
23
shall be cc 3tructed prior to issuance of certificates of use
and occupar.,:y.
3. Required improvements to local storm drains may also be
constructed as needed by the Community Development Commission
of the City of Downey. Implementation of the proposed project
will provide a potential source of funding to provide needed
infrastructure improvements in the proposed project area.
Additional funding arrangements, including issuance of bonds
or other financial instruments, developer reimbursements and
assessment and Community Facilities Districts may also be
used.
4. Developers within the proposed redevelopment area shall comply
with all measures determined to be necessary by the City of
Downey and other governing agencies at the time of site plan
review.
5. Necessary easements required to maintain the storm drain in
Gallatin Road (when constructed) shall be retained by the City
of Downey Department of Public Works.
UTILITIES
Telephone
§ianificant Effect
No significant impacts will occur to communications facilities as
a result of project implementation.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or. substantially lessen the significant
environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR.
Findinas in Sumort of the Fact
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
1. To reduce visual impacts, undergroundinq of cables and other
utility lines should be required in design specifications for
development projects within the redevelopment area. No
additional mitigation measures would be required due to lack
of significant impacts.
24
Natural Gas
Significant Effect
No significant impacts will occur to natural gas service and /or
facilities as a result of project implementation.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR.
Findinas in Support of the Fact
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
1. Energy conservation measures shall be required in accordance
with Title 24 of the California Administrative Code.
2. SCG, which has developed several programs, in addition to
those which are required, should be included within the future
planning process as the redevelopment plan is implemented and
specific projects are approved. These programs will aid in
selecting the most energy efficient applications or systems
for the specific proposed projects.
3. Coordination of the installation of utilities so that on -site
natural gas systems are installed concurrent with other
utilities will minimize disruption and costs. Examples of
project specific measures which may be utilized include the
following:
o Installation of thermal insulation in walls and ceilings
which meet or exceeds the standards established by the
State of California or the Department of Building and
Safety.
o Designs which utilize windowless walls for western
exposures, site orientation of buildings to use solar
heating systems and efficient heating - cooling systems.
o Landscaping and berming designed to moderate building
heat gain may be encouraged.
4. The California Administrative Code and local Building and
Safety Codes incorporate provisions and guidelines for
construction of more energy efficient structures. Compliance
with these provisions and other available mitigation measures
will further conserve available natural gas resources.
25
Electricity
Significant Effect,
No significant impacts will occur to electric service and /or
facilities as a result of project implementation.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,
the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant
environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR.
Findings in Support of the Fact
The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the
extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project.
1. Project design and operations will be required to incorporate
and implement those energy conservation measures as
appropriate to conform to Title 24 requirements.
2. The California Administrative Code and local Building and
Safety Codes incorporate provisions and guidelines for
construction of more energy efficient structures. To reduce
visual impacts, undergrounding of utility lines should be
required in design specifications for development projects
within the redevelopment area. Compliance with these
provisions and other available mitigation measures will reduce
the impacts from electrical energy demand to less than
significant levels.
SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDg,D IF THE
PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED
PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES
Solid Waste
Environmental Effect
Approximately 15 tons of solid waste would be generated upon
buildout and occupancy of the proposed Amended Redevelopment
Project Area. Los Angeles County is facing a major crisis today
in solid waste disposal capacity. Cumulative impacts to solid
waste facilities are, therefore, considered to be significant.
Bindings
Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible
the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the
Final EIR (Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines).
26
E.4 t p2OTt of Findings
The alternatives were rejected for the reasons set forth as
follows:
1.
No Project Alternative
a. Without encouragement and assistance from the
Community Development Commission, expansion of the
City's economic base to provide needed local
employment opportunities and tax revenues may not
occur.
b. The provision of new or expanded public improvements
to serve the Amended Project may not be possible
without redevelopment incentives.
c. Significant effects of the preferred project are
acceptable when balanced against facts set forth in
the Statement of Overriding Considerations and
stated above, and are more acceptable than those
anticipated from the No Project Alternative.
2. Development at Higher Intensity
a. Potential impacts associated with redevelopment at
densities and intensities higher than those
prescribed by the City's General Plan could
overburden some existing infrastructure.
b. This alternative would require the General Plan and
zoning of the City of Downey to be amended to allow
greater development intensity, resulting in a change
in long -term goals and policies previously adopted
by the City.
c. Significant effects of the preferred project are
acceptable when balanced against facts set forth in
the Statement of Overriding Considerations and
stated above, and are more acceptable than those
anticipated from the Development at Higher Intensity
Alternative.
3. Alternative Site /Project Area
a. The impacts of the project at any of the alternative
locations would be equal to or greater than those
at the proposed site.
b. Significant effects of the preferred project are
acceptable when balanced against facts set forth in
the Statement of Overriding Considerations and
stated above, and are more acceptable than those
anticipated from the Alternative Site /Project Area.
27
c. Implementation of the Alternative Site /Project Area
would eliminate the opportunity to eliminate blight
in the proposed Project Area.
ATTACHMENT B
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
AMENDMENT NO. Sr TO DOWNEY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
DOWNEY. CA
The California Environmental Quality Act requires a public agency
to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its
unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve
the project. The Downey Community Development Commission has
determined that the unavoidable risks of this project are
acceptable when balanced against the benefits of this project,
giving greater weight to the unavoidable environmental risks. In
making this determination, the following factors and public
benefits were considered or decisions made:
1. The project will encourage and assist in the development
of new office /professional uses on vacant, underutilized
and physically blighted parcels in a manner which will
strengthen, rather than detract from, the economic
vitality of the community.
2. The project will expand the City's economic base to
provide needed local employment opportunities.
3. The project will result in the rehabilitation of
existing, conforming land uses to extend the life and
quality of such structures.
4. The project will selectively assemble inappropriately
sized and /or underutilized parcels to facilitate
redevelopment of affected uses.
5. The project will provide new or expanded public
improvements to serve the Amended Project Area (as
proposed to be amended) and thereby ensure an improved
environmental quality for the businesses and employees
of Downey, as well as for surrounding residents.s
6. The proposed will achieve land use conformity with the
Downey General Plan.
29
J P M ► Y N r ■
F M
11; ; 4. O ;;;!!! �ailni O ' 0 O ~^ s u r rr.r. III! r ^ e
I-
- M w h O 6 • • C C■ r r
S n n • M A^ O • n O s
if 000 ! 4 • • 0 0 � : 0 at @s e g g $ _ €€
I2 .011 i 3 �� S A S i r V g
ig 'Ili r ° 11 l 1 1 I TT w54
g •" O 'Al Ill V s r 0 E
�j� • p p � i • • O •»^ r illgi
r
F � j e i ! if v. • = . ■ A O ! R
p. r S • � � , `i § S • B N O R S M
1 0 7 O r ti 1 5 O ^•! O: 11 y
• 7 i ^ • •
S n
- 1 51 f a z
▪ 00 Q 5 y
R 6i* ^ jAi n r •■ 1
• " • n
q
8
O M
N
o y n ■
g, K sr K . " ..
ij
C [ lo-
r
p ` O
r
0- :Y
8 : 1g _^
�: 0�
v
O
I
r. ▪ 0
n ^
8' KZ
M M �N+
h O „
7
$ o rag W
BR A
M
og
= o
w r . . _ .. n n
V. 6..
0
.n u ..n • K
:
_ ▪ =° • 3
N�
h ■ •
n v O
r r w r 1+ i0 e !
• • W N M O F •
ear 0.4 i :5r a s1aae�e` s ag" gt sons se co. 0 a "'g
e
» ~ 0 N N • Mon • S N nl N N » e » n he 1► • • a O II Ili ~ •C : hilirii l C a i 6 e� g w O ry i O :1 1
t• r O r• M» • w 8 » M
L e a » n Til- S F r .~. r we .Oi r-
4 °' •S° •..al • roll •~ara °• li
_° oo
$i 4.1!! $~• �S .01��iw. RE 0; 1 1ZE m
rg ■ p • g ! ■ M 10 0 • » • il
• !Ting V
pS A M �r rn °I<° O
•r O1 a•^
24 "2 11 2.p
Iii
• o i glii F1 ImprIfil A Tiro l'..-
O.
ag 0.0 Dr M. ■• 4 :mg
7• • iE E l i -aii
slot
gl tw ir11:1"Li. 0: iliftlEga ...noir MOW DI
▪ Ilirs 10 loom,'
n» 1 p 1 a• . O » M O a 1 O •» O. O O
i 1
n
T
a
9.2. e i I I+° o
•
N " P
N
Ai
i •
N N
W N
N N . r !
r O :7 O J o N F
IT 12'1$31 ea isi �r irii " 1
A b. • r 4. . t. S
•
n .11"84 gn e � S n •S
•
p Iliac'
nAUN 2 4
p 6
�p • .�y r £. 1ii S Di .1 r
F v O O . y r • s i • M a �g 3 8 1g r r • $$ ; /8
a� 'hail! i- a€ •v ! e s .� 1 e
0 14121i/ 01 0 10 • as ~1
R II . . w l eS a ~ ws ii e t ii r �i
_ 2..8•; w v r 8 0 ^ r •
,. • R• a .
mr .s" M li R r C �0 Q t -
1 0 •i i n 1 o .°� �R ...• :u
a . s a�$
• •
M • w w
r r M M
M M M
ti r s s n •0 ; 0'
• 10 A
a 8
•
0
31
• •
w
• 0
•
w.. a
0 O r N N C r
0 I N R! N
G • p z N
• A c I
M
.4
■
1
0 0 0
I 4 w
n
I.
1
•
O . P u . » F
5111 ^ p y� ry �p » pp M
• n S a V S M • S 4 r V N A h • S a M 7 O� h r• $ b. N•� �'1 �f
1 6 ►r. l 4 Ill �• .tee• iO• ili O 111 S S
s !• pg" I 5::011: .°.'^ . s 0 1[ 1
r » ° O a • S � �° i • 2•� X °5 • M 'O° ■°b t° O.1
a o r 0. • M • n XG ■ r ^ MS s S: . M f. ■
sg pies ..P ais'ig E ...tg t. $_a: .. ; :f. • .41'101'6.4 ^ 01'p G° • g•••1; ■ 1 R R „K p..�pN 1
M � g 110101;Iiii S n • Y l S i 1 0 1 F;! : M M . N 4 A 9 O K r h • r X ■■ R' O V ry
- ..Ro. . . wg .- .,n : :� i : : w�°.:. ire *l ie f :
•■• O N M V G X M» . M M
.:ii .. i ;a$ 0. R � : � 1 4 1 $0
h S i M R ■ » K$ ls; q R M II!! {► / ii M 1 V H■ Y
O 00 • f. e� e1 . O . M G V R M 1+ p
i
1 :g• i ii #i5 9. . -..- . agog i' -1$ SS e
�"O.l e i =° ry 9
.. a e g ROW � ? 11; 8 a 6 L
$SS $ Ce ~ 4 ^ w
•r. e3n ° ed � 5 :..s 1 1P r s = a .S.,
-. n.G. i B s o.°.g Fi Ei e i C gip:• '1 o h
� � °�� oa S p . ^5F $� E »Sgtgg
'• ° cr 0 7 , 1 • ? S, fCr
i
N
La
O• w W N 1 ,0
re■ o• ■• see + re r • r■ e.ts
?.a " z sc i ii E i g a ^ a gib llilil ve
n i B ti M ▪ P E . it 0 a :Z1 R ij " ~ S rs l a v g n i
#1 4g1 4 I $ 1 Il s g � g r 1a i
8 � 8 • 4 • g my 3�. . w' .1
r. r ,. i Q ▪ i t p M
e ll: .. 9 e
s.. :M g r r r IV!
r• O f M a °
ag ;£a�eg i a r "it::
g 1; It 3111
Eli 11 6
� O �
E a •• • e. o r� � M i O g g M M •
C
w4u. mil
• r W n ,.
°• r o .- • , . n ". a e r a
P1_0 l$o; � ae o . gg
' ▪ , • ! o I em
q
•
M M M
Y Y 0
W W V
u N r O 0 •
Ic.
ii :1 .r ^lest' P l; a REFi igriiEll £9e ~.•r
7 G »» ■ » ■ r h+ ■ qq » r » e n �1 '
i i S r■ = 0 • e r r r M o ■ ,� M r • R • r r • • O
"...In T 46 8 r 1 .28.F. aF=t•Ea1. •.& S• :
no•8• MSi r�, � • ■ V iz • r.E1 I- ,p » , a .S r
�' r, ° • '» ' ! •
g r r O q g n O � n � i ►� r S S V ...II..
�i S n C.24 4 i Q 0
0l 1, 1 e• ■g Mg= S ■ t ■ eg•g•i;■a 1956"
^se;4g4 ars' la : sl 6iaf E i m na l'a! a r
E Bad _aa :o: q:ef Rife! ' -' 1 » 1* i g
i g i e e~ W. p � g r 0 •• a 4 et a 0 $ a s 1 w 'i r e r
» . r ` 6 r g O •J . r & . » O M» M
8;112 L.
o•
"OD :° SSE U 00 p . €
p
• 1 y a M , 1 • : M » ■ • " g ° ` a P E = . . »
OMr. 8Sr• I . FR I i . £ . .a;�•
tail£r9 8l°° cva . � . " .c° • s roc »$ £ j ge v E: i
E ° $g�i nag a 48 s $ arc:
ga ,�'a
AMr 0 r S � •r ' M» I 0� 0 [r ,°.+O pi el .....•.00 • � s { Q Q $
• -. •00 _ 01 0: S aa act i a� r y e • na B gs
K :'6 2r `.. aa aan hr a5 ~ g » =sh
g • 0000. � �^a . : g • � .. g ' °Og a
- w w w M , w w
w • • 1 r
. O
`41::.
;43 p
.. O ■
D r
»
0• n
R
n •
•
4
N
if
°
A
O • Q 1 p : V • p $ w• Y � • • i s y � C i
IM V 3i!F I !W w Mu �pwrI I+gii 1
csge4 n£ C
^ r €o 5 ; : = o1 fr o1 s �p ;1 1
e Op~ s - M " 44; r sj » " ■ 1 .1 • ~ V 1 ' �'1 : ^ M t ■ M • ;Fe,. , 1
4 II i ll? gr 0 s . ;• r l S $ - €
= ... i i .t.; Sr r S
r r
I g �s g� E w� aa: s•�
g E 3 ' g 7 EE : ire -sue • E r c� caI.111:11. sir
:• . Iry 101; . • ..r "a f.11 r
r "
§'g ems= rr "s "" £i ;E� Lei
_, = E pSlS ■8p 8 litli i pp C� » gi!
w •v » 7 4r ~r H • -■ O xi . • _ » r • Y
1c r� sj- tarsi "mil Is 1114 g. if
1 ~ 1 .i I" xi:" SS f"'" K�pp • E O 4 a. S M! 1=+ V
0 C. .••• N • r ■ i• O O OC C H ■ O Z!!..;!
• • g -4 I Es x1 F r' 1C• S
1 . 1 »
W
€ 1 "151" al
if
8
1
W N M O . . J
r
El ^ k! •• i f ~ K 4 C• ^ r ; . H p V •.; O N e f a N i
» f .
•
°» M M .. • t o r r
F • ».M :1 . . fO e s sO w£a 4. Er
.. r » i ■ �i. ww G O r p S ri �r~ `�fQ O n i r e r
1 4 o t � Sr �a C £ _ :I II LI
s f il;g1
a r eg rt 11
15 I; E 101 0114 1 e a .. » g 0 * M i M r Ill al 51-ig 0. sail i ll
ti! S r i• ill h f !i a•. I l l r v i t f R M • e . A
g
If 1 r e gk a - $ - e gi :: E Nv-! g o . Ill
1 2. A .1 ° � ill C A S $ ° "
O 0. n C c E Ir 6 � C 1 11;;041:i1 G . C
i A i
• O ii "1- i1.3111-111 4 .
• i_
S0 s a g . E�� cg" »�c »r y °
a° .A r .° •
11 M :•rgi flS�. ev f r -o
T ,, e
'e Y
K r• A 0 n h;
s
o e
c
•
n •
T o
O
F
0 0 0 • r M t . ! r0 M O O Ill i Pi S w r f S p° pppp 1 �t 1 i 1 ; g 11I� i i S • H ~ C y n ~ ~•■ M n w• N N M I ^ M ie£'£ f:;; s i O : i� j rE - � " ££
$
s,£ ih Egg£. i WI; xaa
WIN! !Algal g S s Ii£ !!!W I I
�r .- orr r o
i :! Cis£:4 gR ; i£ !IR1 1411801! 00'
g iii 1' a 8 fiitli Ig£fr n_
11" ;WW1 0411; r. 1 s aI = i i g g - n z gl i l.
$ 8 1 E• 1 0 q ! • E rvill g • ^g
T S li �
P
Y ♦ C
y 11!!
M ^ O
rS� • i �i
i n g
1 r�
K ~
•
a
1 • o.
•
so 1
•C
h 11
A
C 1
O
A
H
o M
g W M M O
tl
° • Y O ss tt f" 6 r M M
" E C M M O r r V " O ° : N g M M w
" M a N ( N O E sM qqag • p C M M . r K 1 � g C g V fps !1 V o ^ !�j
p. : O• g
i i i • " / ".; • C F S O s g " i OO i^ if i O w P 4 K
n "�. C ° Cam' o. ;Pi s 1 • " C � • B R o z! � Ili 1 ; 6 [ 111111 a 1 g1 111 1: ao set£ € a 1 � 11411;g151 a �r£
" r ti EE ! w l 7 9 r•. r C r r r
•.1 0 "I ct -: q till ri if 1 W .11
Ili . g r 1.1111W M
E°411 � r
~ o g $ "ws° C4 QQ wf ,•
.°+ r i Ill! " i 1 l e a � "' r ' M 4a 5 N, " r r •
0. oe[ g•r •S 611 r E l e q � r w . aa»
e i f$ S E . !• .. i i" .. 6� r r• 0 C �° O v
'af g'°£ "Mi.E 11 s E! £a£ g ..• $li£g. s. "1
S�j p 6e M C �� 77 • • !�
b 05 O n• 4" "$ " r 5 O" ° • Y p° O ' O r a
• S£°MO •
4 !C f
Fi 2 " . 8 2 4 °�R p p ° ! £v a = ..
w • C E i G 6 1 ^ r fj i r M = V M: »
• a •S r
.1 ▪ f
4. M M r
a
1;1
i O q "
- N 0
•
Z s s r 4 > > e
n n 4 y
r
t
w
W
a''-
•
fr
1,1
1 N N H
0
p
h .
4 4 4
0
i
M N
.r
Il H H H
44 J3
1 a
O ; s • 1
•••I R V • 8
1 W N • 114• 1• 11 1 1
• 4 yY S 4,4 .� : • r11 •
Pt
r4 az 11011 li
I
•
• a 1 I .• • 183 M 2
8 •• g9 1041 •
' 8 S' l4 0 i 1 1 1.2 .
• N N 14 • • • : IN il
•
•• a • • .+ r ° •
. 14 I !1 N A M
O • r 2
ill 3%2 lig• 0 g 4 a
• • l ir ' 4 MI i * : rr"t
°'i • Q� :A la .
3 • • • • c ! f t / . 1 S 1 74 V
° ° € a • 44 1+ a �i 5 gi • d
J r• r. p. •
A.•r
•