Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSupplemental #1 Item 9 powerpoint Traffic Calming Program Presentation to the City Council February 22, 2011 Background Initially adopted by Council in May ’08;  Provides a mechanism whereby residential  neighborhoods can, through a consensus, report speeding and cut-through traffic complaints to the City to request an investigation and appropriate solution; 80 requests received to date.  Tasks Completed Staff met with Council, as directed, in the intervening  months following the initial adoption of the Program; All 46 eligible requests have been evaluated by staff;  Completed and submitted all necessary paperwork to  obligate the federal funding for the purchase and installation of 20 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs (two per location) to be placed at the 10 locations identified by the Council; Tasks Completed (cont.) Speed awareness trailers were deployed at the eight  (8) highest of the 46 evaluated locations in terms of 85% speed. Before vs. After studies were conducted at the eight locations and showed a seven percent (7%) reduction in speed and the number of locations with 85% speeds of 35 MPH or higher was reduced from six(6) down to two(2); Staff is continuing with the application of Stage 1  measures at the 46 locations and any eligible requests to be received in the future. If all possible Stage 1 measures prove ineffective, Stage 2 measures will be considered at that time. Tasks Completed (cont.) Stage 1 traffic calming measures have been implemented recently in conjunction with the completion of two pavement rehabilitation projects: Yellow centerline on Rives Ave. between Quill Dr. and  Pivot St.; and Two-way left-turn lane and right edge-lines on Brookshire  Ave. between Florence Ave. and Gallatin Rd. Program Revisions The Traffic Calming Program has been revised through the addition of the following provisions: Arterial and collector streets are now eligible for traffic  calming, provided they are located within a residential area; A cut-through traffic volume threshold of 40% has been  included in the minimum traffic volume threshold; A priority scheme has been added to ensure the most  effective deployment of resources; Program Revisions (cont.) The use of Neighborhood Watch groups as a  forum to heighten the awareness of neighborhood traffic calming issues; Residents can submit a letter to the City Traffic  Engineer to report offending motorists. The City Traffic Engineer will verify the address of the registered owner of the offending vehicle and send a letter to the individual of the need to drive in a safe, prudent manner; Program Revisions (cont.) The “diverter”has been added as an additional  Stage 2 traffic calming measure; A flow chart has been added to illustrate the  various steps of the Traffic Calming Program. Traffic Diverters Traffic diverters are raised islands or channelization devices that prevent drivers from making particular turns or through moves, usually on residential streets plagued with "cut-through" traffic. For example, a traffic diverter may be installed which forces all traffic at a particular intersection to turn left or turn right. Breaks in the middle of the diverter are commonly provided to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to pass through the diverter. Next Steps Implement the revised Traffic Calming  Program, upon City Council approval; Continue the implementation of Stage 1  traffic calming measures at the 46 eligible locations and other locations to be received in the future. If all possible Stage 1 measures prove ineffective, evaluate for potential Stage 2 measures; Next Steps (cont.) Procure and install the 20 vehicle speed feedback  signs at the 10 predetermined locations and, once operational, evaluate their effectiveness; Budget for cost of conducting future traffic calming  investigations and the construction, maintenance and operation of future traffic calming measures; Continue to pursue grant opportunities to fund the  purchase, construction and implementation of potential future traffic calming measures.