HomeMy WebLinkAbout06. Code Amendment Hospital Medical Arts
AGENDA MEMO
DATE:
February 9, 2010
TO:
MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
By: Brian Saeki, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: CODE AMENDMENT NO. 06-120, REVISION B, A REQUEST TO
AMEND THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS FOR NEW STRUCTURES IN
THE H-M (HOSPITAL MEDICAL ARTS) ZONE
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending that the City Council adopt the following titled ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY APPROVING
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 06-120, REVISION B, THEREBY AMENDING THE SIDE
YARD SETBACKS FOR NEW STRUCTURES IN THE H-M (HOSPITAL MEDICAL
ARTS) ZONE AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
DISCUSSION
At its January 26, 2010 meeting, the City Council held a duly noticed Public Hearing, and
after fully considering all oral and written testimony and facts and opinions offered,
introduced the attached Ordinance.
H:\PLANNING\BLUMENTHAL\Staff Reports\Staff Report_2010-2-9.doc
CITY OF DOWNEY, CALIFORNIA
Code Amendment No 06-120 Rev ‘B’
January 26, 2010- Page 2
ORDINANCE NO.
______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY ADOPTING A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 06-120, REV
‘B’, THEREBY AMENDING THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS FOR NEW STRUCTURES IN
THE H-M (HOSPITAL MEDICAL ARTS) ZONE.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
The City Council of the City of Downey does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
A. On December 2, 2009, the Planning Commission directed staff to initiate a code
amendment to analyze the interior side yard setback for the H-M (Hospital Medical Arts)
zone and bring forth a recommendation on a potential amendment to said setback; and,
B. On December 16, 2009, pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, a Notice of Intent to
adopt a Negative Declaration was filed with the Los Angeles County Recorders office;
and,
C. On January 6, 2010, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing
on Code Amendment No. 06-120, Rev ’B’ and after fully considering all oral and written
testimony and facts and opinions offered at the aforesaid public hearing adopted
Planning Commission Resolution No. 10-2623, recommending that the City Council
adopt a Negative Declaration and approve the proposed Code Amendment; and,
D. On January 15, 2010, notice of the Code Amendment No. 06-120, Rev ‘B” was
advertised as an eighth page ad in the Long Beach Press Telegram; and,
E. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on January 26, 2010, at which time
the City Council considered all oral and written testimony.
SECTION 2.
The City Council further finds, determines and declares that declares that
after preparing an Initial Study in compliance with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act, which found that there would be no significant environmental
impacts created by the proposed Code Amendment, a Negative Declaration was prepared.
Based on its own independent judgment that the facts stated in the initial study are true, the City
Council hereby finds that the approval of the Code Amendment will not have any potential
negative environmental impacts.
SECTION 3.
Having considered all of the oral and written evidence presented to it at
said public hearings, the City Council further finds, determines and declares that:
1. That the requested amendment is necessary and desirable for the development of the
community and is in the interests or furtherance of the public health, safety, and general
welfare. The proposed Code amendment will encourage development of new structures
within the H-M zone. By requiring a tiered setback, construction of taller buildings can
be permitted while preventing the canyon effect, thus preventing impacts to the public
health, safety, and general welfare. Accordingly, revising the setbacks will allow a
harmonious development of the community, while protecting the public health, safety,
and general welfare.
2. That the proposed amendment is in general conformance with the General Plan.
General Plan Policy 1.3.2 states, “Monitor and address changes in land use trends,”
which is implemented with General Plan Program 1.3.2.2, which states, “Adjust the
codes, policies, and regulations in response to changes in land use trends.” A survey of
30 other cities was conducted, of which results indicate that most of the cities only
require a zero or a five foot setback, whereas the City of Downey requires a 15’ setback
This amendment is consistent with the aforementioned General Plan policy and program
since it will adjust the development standards in the H-M zone to be consistent with land
use trends in surrounding comminutes of the region.
SECTION 4.
The City Council of the City of Downey herby amends Table 9.3.6 of
bolded and underlined
Article IX, Chapter 3, Section 9314.06(a), to read as follows (new text
and deleted text strikethrough):
Table 9.3.6
Commercial Zone Property Development Standards
Zone
Development Standard
C-PC-1C-2C-3C-MH-M
Lot area - minimum (square feet) 6,000 6,000 10,000 10,000 87,120 6,000
Lot width - minimum (feet) 60 60 100 100 290 60
Lot depth - minimum (feet) 100 100 100 100 300 100
Floor area ratio - maximum 2.00.251.43.0NA2.0
lots 87,120 square feet or greater NANANANA0.60NA
lots under 87,120 square feet NANANANA0.50NA
a
Lot coverage - maximum (percent) 50 50 50 50 NA 50
Building height - maximum (feet or stories, 75 feet or 20 feet or 45 feet or 105 feet 150 feet 75 feet or
b
whichever is less)5 stories 1 story 3 stories or 7 or 10 5 stories
stories stories
Yard setbacks - minimum (feet)
c
front102015NR2010
rear
abutting a residential zone464646464646
abutting nonresidential zone 151515151515
side
interior
abutting a residential zone 464646464646
abutting a nonresidential zone 55NRNRNR15see
c, d e
street (abutting major roads)102015NR20note
c
street (abutting all other streets)55551510
10
Building separation - minimum (feet) 20 20 20 20 20 20
Air conditioning, mechanical roof and utility Subject to Section 9504
equipment
Environmental protection standards Subject to Section 9516
Graffiti control Subject to Section 4960 of Chapter 10 of Article IV of this Code
Landscaping, lighting, and walls Subject to Section 9520
Nonconforming uses, lots, and structures Subject to Section 9410
Off-street parking and loading Subject to Chapter 7
Signs Subject to Chapter 6
Site plan review Subject to Section 9820
Trash enclosure Subject to Section 9528
Visibility Subject to Section 9520 and 9534
Wireless communication facilities Subject to Section 9426
Code Amendment No 06-120 Rev ‘B’
January 26, 2010- Page 4
Notes:
a
A mezzanine may be permitted in the C-1 Zone provided it does not exceed thirty (30) percent of the square footage of the
ground floor area.
b
When abutting the R-1 and R-2 Residential Zones, variable height limitations shall apply in accordance with Section 9534.24.
c
Parking not permitted in the front or street side setbacks.
d
Major streets are defined as major, primary, and/or second arterials, as identified in the General Plan.
e
Side setbacks shall be five (5’) feet for the first and second floors; ten (10’) for the third and fourth floors; and fifteen
(15’) for the fifth floor.
NA = Not Applicable
NR = No Requirement
SECTION 5.
Based upon the findings set forth in this ordinance the City Council adopts
the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and approves Code Amendment No. 06-120,
Rev ‘B’.
SECTION 6
. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the
same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.
th
APPROVED AND ADOPTED
this 9 day of February, 2010.
ANNE M. BAYER, Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN L. MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss:
CITY OF DOWNEY )
I HEREBY CERTIFY
that the foregoing Ordinance No. ___________, was introduced at
th
a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Downey held on the 26 day of January,
2010, and adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Downey held on this
th
9 day of February, 2010, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
I FURTHER CERTIFY
that a Summary of the foregoing Ordinance No. ________, was
published in the Press-Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Downey, on
___________ (after introduction), and on ________________ (after adoption, including the vote
thereon). It was also posted in the regular posting places in the City of Downey on the same
dates.
__________________________________
KATHLEEN L. MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk